Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 60 references

The five-dimensional N=4 supergravity with SO(2)×ISO(3) gauge group is shown to generate supersymmetric holographic RG flows, non-conformal Janus interfaces, AdS5 black strings and black holes, all uplifting to M-theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:46 UTC pith:2H755T4T

load-bearing objection A useful catalog of BPS solutions with a new non-conformal Janus class, but the load-bearing φ𝜃𝜃=φ𝜄=0 truncation is asserted, not proven. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.08258 v3 pith:2H755T4T submitted 2025-10-09 hep-th

Holographic solutions from 5D SO(2)times ISO(3) N=4 gauged supergravity

Parinya Karndumri This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 04.65.+e11.25.Tq
keywords gauged supergravityholographic RG flowsJanus solutionsAdS black stringsAdS black holesM-theorytopological twistconsistent truncation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that one five-dimensional N=4 gauged supergravity—the SO(2)×ISO(3) theory coupled to three vector multiplets, obtained from maximal seven-dimensional supergravity on a Riemann surface H²—is a productive source of holographic solutions. From its unique supersymmetric AdS5 vacuum, dual to the N=2 SCFT of M5-branes wrapped on H², it derives explicit BPS flows to non-conformal N=2 SYM phases, conformal-interface (Janus) solutions between such phases, supersymmetric black strings with AdS3×Σ near-horizon geometry, and supersymmetric black holes with AdS2×H³ near-horizon geometry. Each family is claimed to lift exactly to eleven-dimensional supergravity on H²×S⁴. If true, these are new holographic dual pairs with computable observables—two-dimensional central charges and a black-hole entropy that a twisted-index calculation could confirm.

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that the SO(2)×ISO(3) N=4 gauged supergravity, coupled to three vector multiplets and reduced from seven dimensions on a Riemann surface H², supports an extensive set of supersymmetric holographic solutions. Working in the SO(2)_diag singlet sector with φ2=φ4=0, the author derives first-order BPS equations from a superpotential and solves them explicitly or numerically: two analytic RG flows whose IR singularities fail standard physicality tests, one numerical N=1 flow to N=2 SYM with a physical singularity, numerical Janus interfaces between N=2 SYM phases (the first non-conformal Janus solutions in five-dimensional gauged supergravity), black strings with AdS3×H²

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is the BPS-equation system of the gauged supergravity. The author truncates to the SO(2)_diag singlet sector of the scalar coset SO(5,3)/SO(5)×SO(3), sets φ2=φ4=0 to eliminate the Yang-Mills currents, and derives first-order flow equations from the supersymmetry transformations of the gravitini, dilatini and gaugini; the superpotential W serves as the generating function for the scalar potential. For the black-string and black-hole sections, topological twisting is the additional mechanism: magnetic gauge fields (an SO(2) pair or an SO(3) triplet) are turned on so that their charges cancel the spin connection of the compact Riemann surface or 3-manifold, permitting Ki

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that setting the two scalar fields φ2 and φ4 to zero is a genuine consistent truncation that removes all vector fields; the paper states this in Section 3 but gives no proof, so if that truncation fails the BPS equations do not describe solutions of the full theory.

What would settle it

Evaluate the full vector-field equations on the truncated ansatz with φ2=φ4=0 and all gauge fields set to zero; if the Yang-Mills currents sourced by the discarded scalars do not vanish identically, the truncation is inconsistent and the derived BPS solutions are not solutions of the complete gauged supergravity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The N=2 SCFT of M5-branes wrapped on a higher-genus surface has holographic RG flows to four-dimensional N=2 SYM; one family (with SO(2)_diag symmetry) preserves four supercharges and ends in a physical IR singularity.
  • The numerical Janus solutions are claimed to be the first non-conformal Janus solutions in five-dimensional gauged supergravities, providing gravity duals for conformal interfaces inside N=2 SYM.
  • Topologically twisted compactifications of the N=2 SCFT on H² or S² yield two-dimensional N=(2,2) and N=(0,2) SCFTs, with central charges computed from the AdS3×Σ fixed points.
  • A twisted compactification on H³ leads to superconformal quantum mechanics in the IR, with a black-hole entropy S_BH ∝ N²|g̃−1|vol(H³)/g³ that can be compared with a supersymmetric index.
  • Because every solution uplifts to M-theory via the consistent H²×S⁴ truncation, the backgrounds are genuine eleven-dimensional supergravity solutions rather than artifacts of the five-dimensional model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the truncation is consistent, the numerical N=1 flow is a concrete gravity dual for an N=2 SYM phase; identifying the exact operator deformations along this flow would sharpen the field-theory interpretation.
  • Editorial inference: the apparent absence of regular Janus interfaces between two AdS5 vacua within this truncation hints at a possible no-go theorem; extending the scalar sector or the twist choices would test how general that obstruction is.
  • Editorial inference: the black-hole entropy formula is a direct target for a twisted-index computation of the N=2 SCFT on H³; a match would provide a microscopic count of the black-hole microstates.
  • Editorial inference: flows that pass through an intermediate AdS5 geometry before reaching lower-dimensional fixed points suggest a general sequential RG-cascade mechanism that may appear in other gauged supergravities with multiple fixed points.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs supersymmetric holographic solutions in five-dimensional N=4 SO(2)×ISO(3) gauged supergravity coupled to three vector multiplets, a theory previously shown to arise from a consistent truncation of eleven-dimensional supergravity on H^2×S^4. It studies RG flows from the supersymmetric AdS5 vacuum (dual to an N=2 SCFT) to non-conformal phases, numerical Janus interfaces between non-conformal phases, and black string/black hole solutions with AdS3×Σ and AdS2×H3 near-horizon geometries. The paper also computes central charges and a black-hole entropy proportional to N^2 and claims that all solutions uplift to M-theory via the established consistent truncation.

Significance. If the solutions are genuine solutions of the full 5D theory, the paper provides a broad new class of holographic duals, including what is claimed to be the first non-conformal Janus solutions in five-dimensional gauged supergravities, and a concrete black-hole entropy formula that could in principle be matched to a twisted index. The use of an established 11D consistent truncation [4,7] and the standard BPS formalism are strengths, and many of the analytic solutions and singularity diagnoses are self-contained and checkable. The main caveat is that the internal scalar/vector truncation underlying all of the solutions is asserted rather than proved; this must be resolved before the results can be regarded as solutions of the full theory.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, after Eq. (33); cf. §5.1 and §5.2] The load-bearing truncation to φ2=φ4=0 with all vector fields zero is stated without proof: "It turns out that in order to consistently truncate out all the vector fields, we need to set φ2=φ4=0. The latter lead to non-vanishing Yang-Mills currents." This is not an automatic consistency statement; if the discarded scalars source the retained fields, then the BPS systems (40), (44), (54)-(57), and the numerical solutions in §4-§6 do not solve the full N=4 theory and cannot be uplifted. Please provide an explicit consistency check from the bosonic equations of motion or a symmetry projection, and similarly justify the later assertions "compatibility ... requires φ4=0" and that the two-form fields can be consistently set to zero.
  2. [§5.2, Eqs. (149)-(150)] Two equations are both labeled h′ but they are not equal as written; this makes the BPS system appear overdetermined. From the structure of Eqs. (124)-(125) and (131)-(132), one of them should almost certainly be f′. The fixed-point solution (152) and the numerical flows in Figs. 5-8 depend on the correct assignment. Please correct the labels and re-verify the subsequent analysis.
  3. [§6, Eqs. (168)-(169)] The BPS equations contain cosh φ3, but the scalar sector in this section has only the single SO(3) singlet φ, with coset representative (161). This appears to be a typo for cosh φ. Since the AdS2×H3 fixed point is obtained by setting φ=0, the precise form of these equations is important; please fix and re-derive the fixed point and the flow equations.
  4. [§5.1, Eqs. (135)-(143); §6, Eq. (173)] The central charge and entropy formulas depend on the normalization of G_N^{(5)}, which is assembled in Eqs. (137)-(140) using several dimensional-reduction relations. The intermediate steps are only sketched. Since Eqs. (143), (155), and (173) are advertised as quantitative predictions that could be matched to field theory, please present the derivation of G_N^{(5)} (or provide a direct reference with the same normalization) so that the numerical factors can be audited.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] "Rimann surface" is a typo for "Riemann surface."
  2. [Throughout] There are multiple typos, e.g., "constrast" in Section 1, "perserve" in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, and "Combing" before Eq. (59).
  3. [Eq. (37)] The combination "sinhϕ2ϕ3" appears in the expression for β; this is likely a typo for "sinh 2ϕ3." Please check and correct.
  4. [References] Reference [2] is missing the article title, and reference [42] has a formatting break in the author list.
  5. [Figures] The numerical solutions in Figs. 1-10 are not accompanied by the initial/boundary conditions, numerical method, or tolerance criteria. Please provide these details to make the solutions reproducible.
  6. [Eq. (155)] The central-charge formula contains an overall factor of κ; for κ=+1 it would be negative unless the other terms conspire. Please state the sign convention and confirm that the physical values (κ=-1 for H^2, κ=+1 for S^2 with the chosen a3) give positive c.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the central BPS constructions are derived from the gauged-supergravity action and solved directly; the flagged truncation gap is an omitted proof, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained against the cited gauged-supergravity framework: the 5D SO(2)×ISO(3) theory and its H^2×S^4 11D origin are taken from [4],[7] (no author overlap with the present author), the AdS5 vacuum and the absence of other supersymmetric vacua are cited to [4], and the RG-flow, Janus, black-string and black-hole BPS equations are obtained from the supersymmetry variations (15)-(17) and then solved, analytically or numerically, in §§3-6. The central charges and black-hole entropy in (142), (143), (155) and (173) are computed from the resulting AdS3×H2/AdS2×H3 fixed-point data via standard holographic formulas; no quantity is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The Janus section does cite [27] (same author) for the structural fact that real A1 eigenvalues do not support curved domain walls, but the subsequent BPS equations and constraints are derived in the present paper, and [27] does not assert the non-conformal Janus result; this is methodological self-citation, not load-bearing circularity. I do flag one genuine gap: the internal truncation to φ2=φ4=0 — "It turns out that in order to consistently truncate out all the vector fields, we need to set φ2=φ4=0. The latter lead to non-vanishing Yang-Mills currents" (Section 3, after Eq. (33)) — and the analogous φ4=0/two-form vanishings in §§5-6 are asserted without proof. This is a load-bearing completeness and correctness risk, but it is not a circular step: no claimed prediction here reduces by construction to an equivalent input or fitted parameter. The remaining self-citations [19,41-43,50,52] are contextual or methodological and do not carry the derivations. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the consistency of the truncation and the BPS-to-field-equations implication; the remaining inputs are standard supergravity formalism. No new fields or entities are postulated.

free parameters (8)
  • gauge coupling ratio g1 = -g/√2 = g1 = -g/√2 (g>0)
    Chosen in Sec 2.2 to normalize Σ=1 at the supersymmetric AdS5 vacuum; all BPS equations and solutions in the paper use this relation.
  • integration constant C0 = C0 = -g1/(√2 g)
    Sec 3.1, Eq (47). Chosen so the SO(2)×SO(3)-symmetric RG flow approaches the N=4 AdS5 vacuum.
  • integration constant C = C = π/2
    Sec 3.2, Eq (63). Chosen so the SO(2)×SO(2)-symmetric flow reaches the AdS5 vacuum at φ2=0.
  • integration constant Σ0 = Σ0 = 0
    Sec 3.2, Eq (65). Chosen to match the AdS5 vacuum value Σ^{-3} = -√2 g1/g at φ2=0.
  • twist parameters a0, a3 (black strings) = e.g., g=2, κ=-1, a3=2; twist conditions g1 a0=1, g a3=1, or g1 a0 + g a3=1
    Sec 5. Constants in the SO(2)×SO(2) gauge-field twist that cancel the spin connection on Σ; they appear in the fixed-point data and central charges.
  • twist parameter a (black holes) = a = a3 = -a4 = a5, with a3 g=1, a4 g=-1, a5 g=1
    Sec 6, Eq (165). Constants for the SO(3) gauge-field twist on M3; the BPS equations and entropy depend on them.
  • Janus turning-point value φ5(r0) = φ5(0)=0.1, 1.0 (examples)
    Sec 4. Initial data at the turning point r0=0 for numerical Janus solutions; different values give regular/singular interfaces.
  • Unspecified numerical boundary conditions = not given
    Several claimed solutions (Figs 1–10) are obtained numerically by tuning boundary conditions near fixed points; exact values are not stated, hampering reproduction.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The SO(2)×ISO(3) gauged N=4 supergravity is a consistent truncation of 11D supergravity on H^2 × S^4.
    Invoked throughout (Sec 2.2 and conclusion), citing [4,5,6,7]. If invalid, the uplifted M-theory interpretation of all solutions fails.
  • domain assumption The truncation to the SO(2)_diag singlet sector with φ2=φ4=0 consistently removes all vector fields.
    Stated in Sec 3 with only a brief justification; all RG-flow and Janus BPS systems rely on it.
  • standard math The BPS equations derived from fermion shifts exhaust the full second-order field equations.
    The paper repeatedly asserts 'it can be verified' that BPS equations imply field equations (e.g., Sec 4 after Eq (98), Sec 5). This is standard in these constructions but not proven here.
  • domain assumption Gubser [47] and Maldacena-Nunez [29] criteria correctly diagnose physical versus unphysical singularities in the uplifted solutions.
    Used in Secs 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 to classify IR singularities; the paper only computes the 00-metric component, not a full singularity analysis.
  • domain assumption There are no other supersymmetric AdS5 vacua in this gauged supergravity.
    Taken from [4] (Sec 2.2); used to argue all supersymmetric RG flows lead to non-conformal phases.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29820 in / 17263 out tokens · 127462 ms · 2026-08-04T10:46:48.128046+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study various types of holographic solutions from five-dimensional $N=4$ gauged supergravity coupled to three vector multiplets with $SO(2)\times ISO(3)$ gauge group. This gauged supergravity can be obtained from the maximal gauged supergravity in seven dimensions on a Riemann surface. For a negatively curved Riemann surface $H^2$, the resulting five-dimensional gauged supergravity admits a supersymmetric $N=4$ $AdS_5$ critical point. This $AdS_5$ vacuum is dual to an $N=2$ superconformal field theory (SCFT) arising from M5-branes wrapped on $H^2$. We study holographic RG flows between this SCFT and $N=2$ non-conformal phases by deformations involving relevant, marginal and irrelevant operators. Solutions describing conformal interfaces between these non-conformal phases and singular boundaries are also given. We finally study a number of supersymmetric $AdS_5$ black string and black hole solutions holographically dual to RG flows across dimensions from the $N=2$ SCFT to two-dimensional SCFTs and superconformal quantum mechanics in the IR. A number of solutions describing black strings and black holes in asymptotically domain wall space-time are also found. All of the solutions can be uplifted to M-theory by a consistent truncation on $H^2\times S^4$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.08258 by Parinya Karndumri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An N = 1 supersymmetric RG flow from the N = 2 SCFT dual to the N = 4 AdS5 vacuum to N = 2 SYM in the IR for g = 2. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An example of Janus solutions interpolating between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An example of Janus solutions interpolating between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of Janus solutions interpolating between singularities on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of supersymmetric AdS5 black string solutions. The or￾ange line represents the solution interpolating between N = 4 AdS5 vacuum and AdS3 ×H2 geometry preserving 8 supercharges. The red (green) line corresponds to a solution interpolating between AdS5 vacuum and AdS3 × H2 (AdS3 × S 2 ) preserving 4 supercharges. with ˜g and ˆg denoting the genera of H˜ 2 and Σ, respectively. For the AdS3 × H2 fixed… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of RG flows from N = 2 SYM to N = (2, 2) SCFT in two dimensions (green) and from N = 2 SYM to four-dimensional N = 2 SCFT and N = (2, 2) SCFT in two dimensions (blue) with g = 2. Using the γrˆ-projector given in (115), we find the following BPS equations ϕ ′ 3 = gΣ −1 e −2ϕ3 sinh ϕ5, (146) ϕ ′ 5 = − 1 2 Σ −1 e −ϕ5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of RG flows from N = 2 SYM to N = (0, 2) SCFT in two dimensions dual to AdS3 × H2 geometry (red) and from N = 2 SYM to four￾dimensional N = 2 SCFT and N = (0, 2) SCFT in two dimensions (purple) with g = 2. purple and cyan lines describe RG flows from N = 2 SYM to two-dimensional N = (0, 2) SCFTs via N = 2 SCFT in four dimensions. As in the previous case, these solutions correspond to black strings… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples of RG flows from N = 2 SYM to N = (0, 2) SCFT in two dimensions dual to AdS3 × S 2 geometry (pink) and from N = 2 SYM to four￾dimensional N = 2 SCFT and N = (0, 2) SCFT in two dimensions (cyan) with g = 2. or S 3 . The metric ansatz is given by ds2 = −e 2f(r) dt2 + dr2 + e 2h(r) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Supersymmetric AdS5 black hole solutions with AdS2×H3 near horizon geometry for g = 2 (red), g = 4 (green) and g = 6 (blue). setting φ = 0, we find examples of numerical solutions interpolating between the AdS5 vacuum and this AdS2×H3 geometry as shown in figure 9 with three differ￾ent values of g = 2, 4, 6. These solutions describe supersymmetric black holes in asymptotically AdS5 space with AdS2 × H3 nea… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Examples of RG flows from N = 2 SYM to superconformal quantum mechanics dual to AdS2 × H3 geometry (green) and from N = 2 SYM to four￾dimensional N = 2 SCFT and superconformal quantum mechanics (orange) with g = 2. SCFT to non-conformal phases with SO(2)×SO(3) and SO(2)×SO(2) symme￾tries. However, the five-dimensional solutions and the uplifted eleven-dimensional solutions contain singularities that are o… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 52 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231-252, arXiv: hep- th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “”, Phys. Lett.B428 (1998) 105-114, arXiv: hep-th/9802.109

    1998

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space and holography

    E. Witten, “Anti De Sitter Space and holography”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2(1998) 253-291, arXiv: 9802150

    1998

  4. [4]

    Consistent KK truncations for M5-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces

    K. C. M. Cheung, J. P. Gauntlett, C. Rosen, “Consistent KK truncations for M5-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces”, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 22, 225003 , arXiv: 1906.08900. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Consistent nonlinear KK reduction of 11-d supergravity onAdS 7 ×S 4 and selfduality in odd dimensions

    H. Nastase, D. Vaman, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Consistent nonlinear KK reduction of 11-d supergravity onAdS 7 ×S 4 and selfduality in odd dimensions”, Phys. Lett.B469(1999) 96–102, arXiv: hep-th/9905075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Consistency of the AdS7 ×S 4 reduction and the origin of selfduality in odd dimensions

    H. Nastase, D. Vaman, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Consistency of the AdS7 ×S 4 reduction and the origin of selfduality in odd dimensions”, Nucl. Phys.B581(2000) 179–239, arXiv: hep-th/9911238

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Consistent truncations around half-maximal AdS5 vacua of 11-dimensional supergravity

    E. Malek and V. V. Camell, “Consistent truncations around half-maximal AdS5 vacua of 11-dimensional supergravity”, Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 7, 075026, arXiv: 2012.15601

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati, and A. Zaffaroni, “Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations ofN= 4 super Yang Mills from AdS dynamics, JHEP 12 (1998)022, arXiv: hep-th/9810126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem

    D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch, and N. P. Warner, “Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 363–417, arXiv: hep-th/9904017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    A Class ofN= 1 Supersymmetric RG Flows from Five-dimensionalN= 8 Supergravity

    A. Khavaev and N. P. Warner, “A Class ofN= 1 Supersymmetric RG Flows from Five-dimensionalN= 8 Supergravity”, Phys. Lett.B495(2000) 215- 222, arXiv: hep-th/0009159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    N= 2 Supersymmetric RG Flows and the IIB Dilaton

    K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, “N= 2 Supersymmetric RG Flows and the IIB Dilaton”, Nucl. Phys.B594(2001) 209-228, arXiv: hep-th/0004063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  12. [12]

    AdS RG-Flow and the Super-Yang-Mills Cas- cade

    N. Evans and M. Petrini, “AdS RG-Flow and the Super-Yang-Mills Cas- cade”, Nucl. Phys.B592(2001) 129-142, arXiv: hep-th/0006048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [13]

    Domain walls ofD= 5 supergravity and fixed points of N= 1 Super Yang Mills

    K. Behrndt, “Domain walls ofD= 5 supergravity and fixed points of N= 1 Super Yang Mills”, Nucl. Phys.B573(2000) 127-148, arXiv: hep- th/9907070

    arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Holographic RG Flows for Four- dimensionalN= 2 SCFTs

    N. Bobev, D. Cassani and H. Triendl, “Holographic RG Flows for Four- dimensionalN= 2 SCFTs”, JHEP 06(2018)086, arXiv: 1804.03276

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [16]

    BPS domain walls inN= 4 supergravity and dual flows

    D. Cassani, G. Dall’Agata and A. F. Faedo, “BPS domain walls inN= 4 supergravity and dual flows”, JHEP 03 (2013)007, arXiv: 1210.8125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [17]

    Hypermulti- plets, domain walls and supersymmetric attractors

    A. Ceresole, G. Dall’Agata, R. Kollosh and A. Van Proeyen, “Hypermulti- plets, domain walls and supersymmetric attractors” Phys. Rev.D64(2001) 104006, arXiv: hep-th/0104056. 38

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [18]

    Consistent truncations of supergravity and 1 2 -BPS RG flows in 4dSCFTs

    A. F. Faedo, C. Nunez and C. Rosen, “Consistent truncations of supergravity and 1 2 -BPS RG flows in 4dSCFTs”, JHEP 03 (2020)080, arXiv: 1912.13516

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [19]

    AdS 5 vacua and holographic RG flows from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity

    P. Karndumri, “AdS 5 vacua and holographic RG flows from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J.C83(2023) 164, arXiv: 2209.05270

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [20]

    A Dilatonic Deformation ofAdS 5 and its Field Theory Dual

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano, “A Dilatonic Deformation ofAdS 5 and its Field Theory Dual”, JHEP 05 (2003)072, arXiv: hep-th/0304129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [21]

    Super Janus

    A. Clark and A. Karch, “Super Janus”, JHEP 10 (2005)094, arXiv: hep- th/0506265

    arXiv 2005

  21. [22]

    Dual of the Janus solution: An interface conformal field theory

    A. B. Clark, D. Z. Freedman, A. Karch and M. Schnabl, “Dual of the Janus solution: An interface conformal field theory”, Phys. Rev.D71(2005) 066003, arXiv: hep-th/0407073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [23]

    Interface Yang-Mills, supersymme- try, and Janus

    E. D’ Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, “Interface Yang-Mills, supersymme- try, and Janus”, Nucl. Phys.B753(2006) 16, arXiv: hep-th/0603013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [24]

    Supersymmetric Janus solutions in five and ten dimensions

    M. W. Suh, “Supersymmetric Janus solutions in five and ten dimensions”, JHEP 09 (2011)064, arXiv: 1107.2796

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [25]

    Janus and J-fold Solutions from Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds

    N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh, J. van Muiden, “Janus and J-fold Solutions from Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds”, Phys. Rev.D100(2019) 081901, arXiv: 1907.11132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [26]

    Holographic Interfaces inN= 4 SYM: Janus and J-folds

    N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh, J. van Muiden, “Holographic Interfaces inN= 4 SYM: Janus and J-folds”, JHEP 05 (2020)134, arXiv: 2003.09154

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [27]

    Janus and RG-flow interfaces from 5D N= 4 gauged super- gravity

    P. Karndumri, “Janus and RG-flow interfaces from 5D N= 4 gauged super- gravity”, Phys. Rev.D111(2025) 12, 126020, arXiv: 2503.06704

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Topological Quantum Field Theory

    E. Witten, “Topological Quantum Field Theory”, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988)353

    1988

  28. [29]

    Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, “Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem”, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A16(2001) 822-855, arXiv: hep-th/0007018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  29. [30]

    Supersymmetry of black strings ind= 5 gauged supergravities

    D. Klemm and W. A. Sabra, “Supersymmetry of black strings ind= 5 gauged supergravities”, Phys. Rev.D62(2000) 024003, arXiv: hep- th/0001131

    arXiv 2000

  30. [31]

    Supersymmetric domain walls and strings ind= 5 gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets

    S. L. Cacciatori, D. Klemm and W. A. Sabra, “Supersymmetric domain walls and strings ind= 5 gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets”, JHEP 03 (2003)023, arXiv: hep-th/0302218. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [32]

    Black strings inAdS 5

    A. Bernamonti, M. M. Caldarelli, D. Klemm, R. Olea, C. Sieg and E. Zorzan, “Black strings inAdS 5”, JHEP 01 (2008)061, arXiv: 0708.2402

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [33]

    Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization

    F. Benini and N. Bobev, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization”, JHEP 06 (2013)005, arXiv: 1302.4451

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [34]

    3D Supergravity from wrapped D3- branes

    P. Karndumri and E. O Colgain, “3D Supergravity from wrapped D3- branes”, JHEP 10 (2013)094, arXiv: 1307.2086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [35]

    (0,2) SCFTs from the Leigh-Strassler fixed point

    N. Bobev, K. Pilch, and O. Vasilakis, “(0,2) SCFTs from the Leigh-Strassler fixed point”, JHEP 06 (2014)094, arXiv:1403.7131

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [36]

    Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes

    F. Benini, N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes”, JHEP 07 (2016)020, arXiv: 1511.09462

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [37]

    Black string first order flow in N= 2,d= 5 abelian gauged supergravity

    D. Klemm, N. Petri and M. Rabbiosi, “Black string first order flow in N= 2,d= 5 abelian gauged supergravity”, JHEP 01 (2017)106, arXiv: 1610.07367

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [38]

    Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography

    N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno, “Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography”, JHEP 12 (2017) 065, arXiv: 1708.05052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [39]

    AdS 5 black strings in the stu model of FI-gaugedN= 2 supergravity

    M. Azzola, D. Klemm and M. Rabbiosi, “AdS 5 black strings in the stu model of FI-gaugedN= 2 supergravity”, JHEP 10 (2018)080, arXiv: 1803.03570

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [40]

    Betti multiplets, flows across dimensions and c-extremization

    A. Amariti and C. Toldo, “Betti multiplets, flows across dimensions and c-extremization”, JHEP 07 (2017)040, arXiv: 1610.08858

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [41]

    Holographic RG flows andAdS 5 black strings from 5D half-maximal gauged supergravity

    H. L. Dao and P. Karndumri, “Holographic RG flows andAdS 5 black strings from 5D half-maximal gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J.C79(2019) 137, arXiv: 1811.01608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [42]

    Supersymmetric black holes and strings from 5D gauged supergravity

    H. L. Dao and P. Karndumri, “Supersymmetric black holes and strings from 5D gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J.C79(2019) 247, arXiv: 1812.10122. C. Couzens, N. T. Macpherson and A. Passias,N= (2,2)AdS 3 from D3-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces, JHEP 02 (2022)189, arXiv: 2107.13562

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [43]

    New supersymmetricAdS 5 black strings from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity

    P. Karndumri, “New supersymmetricAdS 5 black strings from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J.C83(2023) 432, arXiv: 2211.07456

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [44]

    GaugedN= 4 supergravities

    J. Schon and M. Weidner, “GaugedN= 4 supergravities”, JHEP 05 (2006) 034, arXiv: hep-th/0602024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [45]

    General matter coupled N= 4 gauged supergravity in five-dimensions

    G. Dall’Agata, C. Herrmann, and M. Zagermann, “General matter coupled N= 4 gauged supergravity in five-dimensions”, Nucl. Phys.B612(2001) 123–150, arXiv: hep-th/0103106. 40

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [46]

    N= 4 supersymmetricAdS 5 vacua and their moduli spaces

    J. Louis, H. Triendl and M. Zagermann, “N= 4 supersymmetricAdS 5 vacua and their moduli spaces”, JHEP 10 (2015)083, arXiv:1507.01623

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [47]

    Curvature singularities: the good, the bad and the naked,

    Steven S. Gubser, “Curvature singularities: the good, the bad and the naked,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000), 679-745, arXiv: hep-th/0002160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  47. [48]

    Janus solutions in six-dimensional gauged supergravity

    M. Gutperle, J. Kaidi and H. Raj, “Janus solutions in six-dimensional gauged supergravity”, JHEP 12 (2017)018, arXiv: 1709.09204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [49]

    Supersymmetric Janus solutions of dyonicISO(7)-gaugedN= 8 supergravity

    M. Suh, “Supersymmetric Janus solutions of dyonicISO(7)-gaugedN= 8 supergravity”, JHEP 04 (2018)109, arXiv: 1803.00041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [50]

    Janus solutions from dyonicISO(7) max- imal gauged supergravity

    P. Karndumri and C. Maneerat, “Janus solutions from dyonicISO(7) max- imal gauged supergravity”, JHEP 10 (2021)117, arXiv: 2108.13398

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Holographic RG-flows and Boundary CFTs

    M/ Gutperle and J. Samani, “Holographic RG-flows and Boundary CFTs”, Phys. Rev.D86(2012) 106007, arXiv: 1207.7325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [52]

    Supersymmetric deformations of 3D SCFTs from tri- sasakian truncation

    P. Karndumri, “Supersymmetric deformations of 3D SCFTs from tri- sasakian truncation”, Eur. Phys. J. C (2017)77, 130, arXiv: 1610.07983

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [53]

    GaugedN= 4 supergravities in five dimensions and their magnetovac backgrounds

    L. J. Romans, “GaugedN= 4 supergravities in five dimensions and their magnetovac backgrounds”, Nucl. Phys.B267(1986) 433,

    1986

  53. [54]

    D= 5SU(2)×U(1) gauged supergravity fromD= 11 supergravity

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela, “D= 5SU(2)×U(1) gauged supergravity fromD= 11 supergravity”, JHEP 02 (2008)083, arXiv: 0712.3560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [55]

    Supergravity and D-branes Wrapping Supersymmetric 3-Cycles

    H. Nieder and Y. Oz, “Supergravity and D-branes Wrapping Supersymmetric 3-Cycles”, JHEP 03 (2001)008, arXiv: hep-th/0011288

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [56]

    Defects in 4d SCFTs from supergravity and holographic renormalization

    F. Faedo, N. Petri and A. Segati, “Defects in 4d SCFTs from supergravity and holographic renormalization”, JHEP 05 (2025)070, arXiv: 2501.17923

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle

    P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. Perez Ipina, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle”, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 111601, arXiv: 2011.10579

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [58]

    D3-branes and M5-branes wrapped on a topological disc

    M. Suh, “D3-branes and M5-branes wrapped on a topological disc”, JHEP 03 (2022)043, arXiv: 2108.01105

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [59]

    A topologically twisted index for three- dimensional supersymmetric theories

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, “A topologically twisted index for three- dimensional supersymmetric theories”, JHEP 07 (2015)127, arXiv: 1504.03698

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [60]

    Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization

    F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, “Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization”, JHEP 05 (2016)054, arXiv: 1511.04085. 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [61]

    Exact microstate counting for dyonic black holes in AdS4

    F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, “Exact microstate counting for dyonic black holes in AdS4”, Phys. Lett.B771(2017) 462–466, arXiv: 1608.07294. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017