Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

LHC displaced-vertex searches can, without any prompt-lepton requirement, probe tau-coupled heavy neutral leptons over an order of magnitude deeper with existing data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 09:57 UTC pith:RRQT2GLO

load-bearing objection Plausible generator-level case for tau-flavor HNL DV searches at the LHC; the order-of-magnitude sensitivity gain hinges on an explicitly optimistic 100% reconstruction efficiency and a background-free assumption. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.12248 v2 pith:RRQT2GLO submitted 2025-10-14 hep-ph hep-ex

Constraining Heavy Neutral Leptons Coupled to the Tau-Neutrino Flavor at the Large Hadron Collider

Edis D. Tireli , Rikke S. Klausen , Oleg Ruchayskiy This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords heavy neutral leptonstau neutrino mixingdisplaced verticeslong-lived particlesLHC searcheshadronic tau decaysdilepton final statessterile neutrinos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that existing displaced-vertex searches at the LHC can be repurposed to probe heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) that mix mainly with the tau neutrino, a coupling the LHC has never directly constrained. The key move is to drop the usual requirement of a prompt lepton: the signal is W -> tau N, with the tau decaying hadronically and the HNL decaying to a dilepton pair plus a neutrino, producing a clean displaced vertex. Using an ATLAS-inspired detector model and optimized cuts in the dilepton-mass versus decay-radius plane, the authors find that the Run 2 dataset already collected could beat older lepton-collider and beam-dump bounds by more than an order of magnitude. At 3000 inverse femtobarns, the projected reach improves by up to three orders of magnitude around HNL masses of 10-15 GeV. This matters because tau-flavor HNL mixing is the least explored lepton flavor and is connected to neutrino mass generation and baryogenesis.

Core claim

The central claim is that HNL production via W -> tau N followed by N -> l+l- nu_tau gives a displaced-vertex signature whose probability scales as Theta_tau^4, so it isolates the tau-flavor mixing angle directly. Existing ATLAS-style displaced-vertex analyses require a prompt lepton, which presumes a leptonically decaying tau; allowing the tau to decay hadronically removes that bottleneck. Using generator-level Monte Carlo with a simplified cylindrical detector model, the paper finds that a flat invariant-mass cut discards much of the signal, while a piecewise cut in the (m_ll, r_DV) plane recovers it. Counting N>=3 background-free events, the electron and muon channels contribute overlappi

What carries the argument

The central object is the heavy neutral lepton (HNL), a hypothetical sterile neutrino that mixes with the tau flavor with strength Theta_tau. The mechanism carrying the argument is the process pp -> W -> tau N with a hadronically decaying tau and N -> l+l- nu_tau, selected via displaced-vertex criteria. The key optimization is a piecewise invariant-mass cut, an m_ll threshold that depends on the radial position r_DV of the decay, which admits low-mass dilepton pairs near the inner tracker that a flat 5 GeV cut would reject. A simplified cylindrical detector geometry, separate fiducial volumes for electrons and muons, and a modelled decay-volume efficiency complete the pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

The results hinge on assuming that every displaced vertex inside the modeled detector volume is reconstructed with 100% efficiency; if real vertex-finding efficiency is appreciably lower at the radii where signal decays cluster, the projected bounds weaken.

What would settle it

Apply the measured large-impact-parameter track-reconstruction efficiency as a function of radius to the authors' accepted-event sample; if fewer than three signal events survive at the previous bound with 139 fb^-1, the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • A reanalysis of Run 2 data already in hand could set the first direct LHC limits on HNLs coupling predominantly to the tau neutrino, beating older lepton-collider and beam-dump bounds by more than an order of magnitude.
  • At 3000 fb^-1, the projected reach extends up to three orders of magnitude deeper near HNL masses of 10-15 GeV, the range tied to leptogenesis scenarios.
  • The combined e+e- and mu+mu- channels each see the signal over most of the explored region, so requiring both provides a strong cross-check against background.
  • The piecewise mass-versus-radius cut recovers events that a flat dilepton-mass cut throws away; without it, the Run 2 sensitivity largely disappears.
  • A positive signal would link tau-flavor HNL mixing to neutrino mass generation and baryogenesis, while a null result would bound GeV-scale sterile-neutrino models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 100% vertex-reconstruction efficiency inside the modeled volume is an optimistic assumption; real tracking efficiency degrades with radius, so the true reach is likely softer, though the size of the effect is testable with public detector-performance data.
  • Because the selection closely mirrors an existing displaced-vertex analysis, the fastest test of the claim is to reinterpret that search's data with the prompt-lepton requirement removed.
  • The piecewise mass-radius veto idea could transfer to other long-lived-particle searches at the LHC, such as exotic decays producing displaced lepton pairs near the first tracker layers.
  • If detector upgrades extend large-radius tracking and displaced-electron reconstruction, the projected three-order-of-magnitude sensitivity becomes more realistic; the paper itself points toward this as a needed step.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a displaced-vertex (DV) search strategy for heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) that mix predominantly with the tau neutrino, using pp -> W -> tau N -> tau + l+l- nu_tau and explicitly dropping the prompt-lepton requirement of existing LHC searches. The analysis is generator-level: MadGraph5 for signal, Pythia for tau decays, a simplified cylindrical ATLAS geometry, and flat or piecewise cuts in the invariant-mass versus decay-radius plane. The authors report projected sensitivities for 139, 300, and 3000 fb^-1 in the e+e-, mu+mu-, and combined channels, claiming that Run 2 data could improve DELPHI/BEBC bounds by more than an order of magnitude and that the HL-LHC could reach three orders of magnitude near m_N 10-15 GeV. The central caveat is that DV reconstruction efficiency is assumed to be 100% inside the fiducial volume and backgrounds are argued to be negligible rather than simulated.

Significance. The physics motivation is solid: direct experimental constraints on tau-flavor HNL mixing are lacking, and the idea of using the W->tau N channel without a prompt lepton is a genuinely useful extension of existing DV searches. The paper makes a good-faith effort to document the MC setup, validate lifetimes against the HeavyN NLO model, and release the analysis toolkit (W2HNL) publicly, which aids reproducibility. If the idealized assumptions are taken at face value, the projections cover an interesting and previously unexplored region. However, the quantitative reach, especially the Run-2 claim, is sensitive to the unmodeled reconstruction efficiency and the zero-background assumption, so the numerical results should be treated as upper limits on sensitivity until those effects are folded in.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III (DV reconstruction efficiency)] The assumption of 100% DV reconstruction efficiency multiplies every expected signal yield. Figure 4b shows that at L=139 fb^{-1} with the flat cut, neither the e^+e^- nor the mu^+mu^- channel alone reaches N>=3; only their combination does. Since Ref. [44] and the paper's own Sec. V state that large-radius tracking efficiency is below unity and decreases with impact parameter (especially for electrons), a realistic efficiency of order 50% for muons and lower for electrons would reduce the combined yield below the N=3 threshold, invalidating the headline claim of more than one order-of-magnitude improvement over DELPHI/BEBC. The authors acknowledge the assumption but do not propagate its uncertainty. The sensitivity contours in Figs. 3-4 should either include efficiency benchmarks or be labeled as idealized upper limits.
  2. [Section IV (Background considerations)] The paper does not simulate or estimate the SM background yield. The statement in Section IV that the search is 'effectively background-free' is based on the ATLAS validation region of Ref. [20], but the studied topology deliberately has no prompt lepton, so the background composition may differ. No event count or limit is given for the final selection (no prompt lepton, m_DV and r_DV veto). Consequently, the N>=3 criterion of Section II cannot be justified as a 95% CL bound. Furthermore, the cross-channel background-rejection argument in the first bullet of Section IV contradicts Fig. 4b, where at 139 fb^{-1} with the flat cut neither individual channel has >=3 events. Please provide a quantitative background estimate or state that the projection is for zero background and interpret the contours accordingly.
  3. [Eqs. (2)-(3) and Section III B] The normalization chain leading to Eq. (3) is not transparent. The text says sigma(pp->tau_h N) in Eq. (2) is obtained by rescaling sigma(pp->W)Br(W->ell nu)=20.6 nb by Theta^2_tau, while Section III B states that Br(tau->X)=0.895/0.912 is used in Eq. (2). The numeric plug-in in Eq. (3) does not include this tau-decay acceptance (nor an explicit W->tau N phase-space factor for m_N up to 20 GeV). Depending on the intended definition, the expected yields in Figs. 3-4 may be overestimated by ~10%. Please define sigma(pp->tau_h N) unambiguously and show the full chain from the measured W cross-section to the event count.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V] The statement 'The adopted radial displacement requirement, r_dv >= 100 mm' is inconsistent with Table I, which lists r_min = 120 mm (flat) or 50 mm (piecewise). Please harmonize the text with the table.
  2. [Section III A 2] The functional form of the piecewise cut is not documented; Figure 8 shows it only visually. Provide an analytic expression or a table so the analysis is reproducible, especially because Ref. [38] is a PhD thesis that may not be easily accessible.
  3. [Abstract and text] The abstract says 'several such optimized strategies' but the paper presents only two selection strategies (flat and piecewise). Please adjust the wording or clarify the variations.
  4. [Various typos] Minor language issues: 'Pluging' should be 'Plugging'; 'over times' should be 'over time'; 'these particle' should be 'these particles'; Ref. [46] has 'Particle Data Groupcollaboration' missing a space.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the sensitivity chain is MC-generated from external inputs, and the 100% DV-efficiency assumption is a flagged robustness limitation rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) MadGraph MC for pp -> W -> tau N -> l+l- nu_tau; (ii) HNL lifetimes/branching ratios taken from [34] and validated against the independent HeavyN NLO model [41,42]; (iii) the W cross-section normalized to the measured sigma(pp->W)Br(W->lnu)=20.6 nb [33]; (iv) tau decay fractions from Pythia [45]; (v) generator-level acceptance from a simplified detector geometry; (vi) sensitivity boundaries obtained by solving Eq. (2), N_l+l- = L * Theta_tau^2 * sigma * Br * epsilon_acc, for N=3 and comparing with external DELPHI/BEBC limits. None of these inputs contains the projected limit as a fitted quantity, and Eq. (2)/(3) are scaling estimates, not retrofits. The piecewise invariant-mass cut is explicitly motivated by ATLAS background observations [20,38], not by fitting the projected exclusion curve. Section III states: 'The DV reconstruction efficiency is assumed to be 100%... While it is known that vertex reconstruction efficiency decreases with distance [44], properly incorporating this effect outside the ATLAS environment is challenging. Therefore, we have chosen not to include it in our analysis.' This is an acknowledged optimistic detector assumption; it can weaken the real-world reach if reconstruction efficiency is below unity, but it is an input assumption, not a circular construction. The paper does cite prior work by the same group for HNL phenomenology, but that work supplies lifetimes/branching ratios that are independently validated against HeavyN NLO, and it does not contain the present paper's sensitivity result. No step was found in which a prediction is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict, nor any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The central claim therefore has independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles or interactions are invented; the paper uses the standard HNL framework with a tau-flavor mixing angle. The central sensitivity claim rests on three assumptions: 100% DV reconstruction efficiency, standard MC signal generation with tau branching fractions from Pythia, and the reduction of backgrounds to negligible levels after the specified cuts.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Simplified ATLAS detector geometry: 100% acceptance and 100% track/DV reconstruction efficiency inside the fiducial cylinder (Table I; Section III A 1; Section III, 'The DV reconstruction efficiency is assumed to be 100%...')
    This is the dominant optimistic assumption. Real tracking/vertexing efficiency is known to decrease with impact parameter and distance [44]; the authors explicitly state they do not include this effect.
  • domain assumption The signal process pp -> W -> tau N with N -> l+l- nu_tau is generated at tree level with MadGraph; production scaled by sigma(pp->W)*Br(W->tau nu), with Br(tau -> hadrons) computed from Pythia (Eq. 2-4; Section III).
    The signal cross section and tau decay modeling are standard, but the letter's sensitivity numbers inherit any systematic errors from this MC/scaling chain (e.g., NLO corrections, PDF uncertainties are not evaluated).
  • domain assumption Background is negligible after cuts, based on the ATLAS validation region [20,38] and the imposed mdv > 5.5 GeV / rdv < 50 mm veto (Section IV).
    No background MC sample is generated or quantified. The 'background-free' claim is argued from ATLAS observations for a related topology, not from a full background estimate for this exact selection.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining Heavy Neutral Leptons Coupled to the Tau-Neutrino Flavor at the Large Hadron Collider." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRQT2GLO

@misc{pith2026251012248,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining Heavy Neutral Leptons Coupled to the Tau-Neutrino Flavor at the Large Hadron Collider},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRQT2GLO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.12248}
}
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Displaced vertex (DV) signatures at colliders offer a powerful probe of new long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model. Among the best-motivated candidates are heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) - heavier counterparts of Standard Model neutrinos - which can account for the origin of neutrino masses and potentially produce di-leptonic DV signatures. In this study, we demonstrate how existing DV searches at the LHC can be extended to probe HNLs that couple predominantly to the tau-neutrino flavor. While current search strategies rely on identifying a prompt lepton alongside a displaced vertex, we show that analyzing events without a prompt lepton enables sensitivity to the process $pp \to W \to \tau N$, where the tau decays hadronically and the HNL subsequently decays to a lepton pair and a neutrino. We perform detailed Monte Carlo simulations of this process with HNLs decaying to $\mu^+\mu^-$ or $e^+e^-$ final states, apply ATLAS-inspired selection criteria, and optimize signal sensitivity. In particular, we demonstrate that appropriate cuts in the plane of di-lepton invariant mass and DV radial position significantly enhance signal visibility. We propose several such optimized strategies and show that even with Run 2 data $139~\text{fb}^{-1}$ , existing bounds can be improved by more than an order of magnitude. Future high-luminosity runs may strengthen sensitivity by up to three orders of magnitude compared to current limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12248 by Edis D. Tireli, Oleg Ruchayskiy, Rikke S. Klausen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The branching ratios of an HNL decaying into a lep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The signal sensitivity for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The fraction of HNLs that decay within the fiducial volume defined by a minimal decay radius, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The survival efficiency of HNLs under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The survival efficiency of the HNLs from the combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Cumulative effect of the selection criteria ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The transverse momenta of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. QCD corrections to charged-current decays with Heavy Sterile Neutrinos in initial or final state and their impact on $\tau$ decays

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    New O(α_s^4) formulas for N→τ+hadrons and τ→N+hadrons give |sinθ| ≤ 0.2 at m_N ≈ 600 MeV and a marginal (9.1^{+3.7}_{−7.8})×10⁻² mixing hint from τ→πν and τ→Kν data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The minimal decay volume is defined by a spherical criterion, whereby any decay vertex with a radial position below the threshold rmin is excluded

    Decay volume The detector environment is modeled as a simplified cylindrical model of the ATLAS environment considering 100% detector acceptance and track reconstruction. The minimal decay volume is defined by a spherical criterion, whereby any decay vertex with a radial position below the threshold rmin is excluded. The outer boundary for the included de...

  2. [2]

    In the flat approach, a constant invariant mass cut is applied to all events regardless of the HNL decay position, rDV

    Invariant mass The invariant mass selection criteria have been studied using both the flat and piecewise approaches for the elec- tron and muon channels. In the flat approach, a constant invariant mass cut is applied to all events regardless of the HNL decay position, rDV . In contrast, the piecewise approach adjusts the mass selection criterion depending...

  3. [3]

    Davidson, E

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi and Y. Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rept. 466 (2008) 105 [ 0802.2962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Pilaftsis, The Little Review on Leptogenesis , J

    A. Pilaftsis, The Little Review on Leptogenesis , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 171 (2009) 012017 [ 0904.1182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Klari´ c, M

    J. Klari´ c, M. Shaposhnikov and I. Timiryasov, Reconciling resonant leptogenesis and baryogenesis via neutrino oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 055010 [2103.16545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Boyarsky, M

    A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens and O. Ruchayskiy, Sterile neutrino Dark Matter , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 1 [ 1807.07938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov, The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses , Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 151 [ hep-ph/0503065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Asaka and M

    T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, The νMSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe , Phys. Lett. B 620 (2005) 17 [ hep-ph/0505013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  9. [9]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Shaposhnikov, The Role of sterile neutrinos in cosmology and astrophysics , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 191 [ 0901.0011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Bondarenko, A

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, J. Klaric, O. Mikulenko, O. Ruchayskiy, V. Syvolap et al., An allowed window for heavy neutral leptons below the kaon mass , JHEP 07 (2021) 193 [ 2101.09255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Pilaftsis, Radiatively induced neutrino masses and large Higgs neutrino couplings in the standard model with Majorana fields , Z

    A. Pilaftsis, Radiatively induced neutrino masses and large Higgs neutrino couplings in the standard model with Majorana fields , Z. Phys. C 55 (1992) 275 [hep-ph/9901206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  12. [12]

    Shaposhnikov, A Possible symmetry of the nuMSM , Nucl

    M. Shaposhnikov, A Possible symmetry of the nuMSM , Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 49 [ hep-ph/0605047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Kersten and A

    J. Kersten and A. Y. Smirnov, Right-Handed Neutrinos at CERN LHC and the Mechanism of Neutrino Mass Generation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073005 [0705.3221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Tastet and I

    J.-L. Tastet and I. Timiryasov, Dirac vs. Majorana HNLs (and their oscillations) at SHiP , JHEP 04 (2020) 005 [1912.05520]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Fern´ andez-Mart ´ ınez, X

    E. Fern´ andez-Mart ´ ınez, X. Marcano and D. Naredo-Tuero, HNL mass degeneracy: implications for low-scale seesaws, LNV at colliders and leptogenesis , 2209.04461

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Tastet, O

    J.-L. Tastet, O. Ruchayskiy and I. Timiryasov, Reinterpreting the ATLAS bounds on heavy neutral leptons in a realistic neutrino oscillation model , JHEP 12 (2021) 182 [ 2107.12980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case , Rept

    S. Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case , Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 124201 [ 1504.04855]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Ahdida et al., Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to Heavy Neutral Leptons , JHEP 04 (2019) 077 [ 1811.00930]

    SHiP collaboration, C. Ahdida et al., Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to Heavy Neutral Leptons , JHEP 04 (2019) 077 [ 1811.00930]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 221801 [ 1802.02965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons produced in 13 TeV pp collisions using prompt and displaced signatures with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10 (2019) 265 [1905.09787]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Aaij et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in W + → µ+µ±jet decays, Eur

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in W + → µ+µ±jet decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 248 [ 2011.05263]

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Aad et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in s=13 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in s=13 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 061803 [2204.11988]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 tev, JHEP 07 (2022) 081 [ 2201.05578]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 tev, JHEP 07 (2022) 081 [ 2201.05578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s =13 TeV, 2403.00100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, 2402.18658

    CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, 2402.18658

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons using leptonic and semi-leptonic displaced vertices in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , 2503.16213

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    A. M. Abdullahi, P. Barham Alz´ as, B. Batell, J. Beacham, A. Boyarsky, S. Carbajal et al., The present and future status of heavy neutral leptons , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 50 (2023) 020501

    2023

  28. [28]

    K. A. Urqu ´ ıa-Calder´ on, I. Timiryasov and O. Ruchayskiy, Heavy neutral leptons — Advancing into the PeV domain , JHEP 08 (2023) 167 [ 2206.04540]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fern´ andez-Mart ´ ınez, J. Hern´ andez-Garc ´ ıa, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, X. Marcano and D. Naredo-Tuero, Bounds on lepton non-unitarity and heavy neutrino mixing , JHEP 08 (2023) 030 [2306.01040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Morancho Tarda, Search for prompt heavy neutral lepton decays into tau leptons with the atlas detector , May, 2022

    A. Morancho Tarda, Search for prompt heavy neutral lepton decays into tau leptons with the atlas detector , May, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    BaBar collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for heavy neutral leptons using tau lepton decays at BaBaR , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 052009 [ 2207.09575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Nayak et al., Search for a heavy neutral lepton that mixes predominantly with the tau neutrino , Phys

    Belle collaboration, M. Nayak et al., Search for a heavy neutral lepton that mixes predominantly with the tau neutrino , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) L111102 [2402.02580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Abbasi et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons with IceCube DeepCore , 2502.09454

    IceCube collaboration, R. Abbasi et al., Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons with IceCube DeepCore , 2502.09454

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Boiarska, A

    I. Boiarska, A. Boyarsky, O. Mikulenko and M. Ovchynnikov, Constraints from the CHARM experiment on heavy neutral leptons with tau mixing , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095019 [ 2107.14685]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Aad et al., Measurement of W ± and Z-boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of W ± and Z-boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 601 [ 1603.09222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Bondarenko, A

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, D. Gorbunov and O. Ruchayskiy, Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy Neutral Leptons, JHEP 11 (2018) 032 [ 1805.08567]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Abreu et al., Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays , Z

    DELPHI collaboration, P. Abreu et al., Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays , Z. Phys. C 74 (1997) 57

    1997

  38. [38]

    Bondarenko, A

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy and L. Shchutska, Probing new physics with displaced vertices: muon tracker at CMS , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075015 [ 1903.11918]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Drewes and J

    M. Drewes and J. Hajer, Heavy neutrinos in displaced vertex searches at the lhc and hl-lhc , Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Appelt, Extending the limits in the hunt for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN , Ph.D

    C. Appelt, Extending the limits in the hunt for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN , Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, 2024. 10.18452/28639

    work page doi:10.18452/28639 2024

  41. [41]

    Barouki, G

    R. Barouki, G. Marocco and S. Sarkar, Blast from the past II: Constraints on heavy neutral leptons from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment , SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 118 [ 2208.00416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    D. Alva, T. Han and R. Ruiz, Heavy majorana neutrinos from wγ fusion at hadron colliders , Journal of High Energy Physics 1502 (2015) 072 [ 1411.7305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Degrande, O

    C. Degrande, O. Matteleer, R. Ruiz and J. Turner, Fully-automated precision predictions for heavy neutrino production mechanisms at hadron colliders , Physical Review D 94 (2016) 053002 [ 1602.06957]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    E. D. Tireli, W2HNL:Displaced-vertex analysis toolkit for long-lived particles , Zenodo (2025) [github.com/edtireli/W2HNL]

    2025

  46. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the reconstruction of large impact parameter tracks in the inner detector of ATLAS , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1081 [2304.12867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159–177

    2015

  48. [48]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.