pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.12837 · v3 · pith:376GH6OAnew · submitted 2025-10-13 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.AI· cs.CY· cs.NE

Semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution

Anil Yaman , Shen Tian , Bj\"orn Lindstr\"om This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.AIcs.CYcs.NE
keywords semantic knowledgeinnovationcultural evolutionsocial learningcumulative cultureagent-based modelbehavioral experiment
0
0 comments X

The pith

Semantic knowledge links concepts to their properties and functions to guide innovation and accelerate cumulative cultural evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that semantic knowledge, the web of associations between concepts and their properties and functions, is the cognitive mechanism that directs human innovation away from random variation and toward useful solutions. This directed process allows innovations to build on one another across generations, producing the open-ended complexity of human culture. The authors support the claim with an agent-based model showing how semantic knowledge shapes evolutionary dynamics and a large behavioral experiment in which participants with semantic access outperformed those without it, even when both groups could use social learning. Without semantic knowledge, performance dropped to chance levels and exploration remained shallow. The work positions semantic knowledge as the key enabler that makes social learning productive for cumulative culture.

Core claim

Semantic knowledge—the associations linking concepts to their properties and functions—guides human innovation and drives cumulative culture. In an agent-based model and a behavioral experiment with 1,243 participants, semantic knowledge directed exploration toward meaningful solutions, raised innovation success rates, supported generalization from earlier discoveries, and interacted synergistically with social learning to speed cultural change. Participants denied semantic access performed no better than chance and used shallow strategies regardless of whether social learning was available.

What carries the argument

Semantic knowledge, the set of associations that connect concepts to their properties and functions, which channels search away from random variation and toward solutions that build on prior successes.

If this is right

  • Innovation success rates rise when semantic associations are available to guide search.
  • Social learning produces faster cumulative change when combined with semantic knowledge than when acting alone.
  • Generalization across related problems improves once semantic links allow transfer from prior solutions.
  • Without semantic knowledge, cultural accumulation stalls at chance levels even with opportunities to observe others.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cultural evolution models that treat innovation as random variation will systematically understate the rate at which useful traits accumulate in humans.
  • Artificial systems that lack explicit semantic associations may require different mechanisms to achieve human-like cumulative progress.
  • The same semantic-guidance process could be examined in non-human species to test whether its presence predicts the extent of observed cultural complexity.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental conditions isolate semantic knowledge as the sole causal difference between groups rather than introducing hidden differences in task difficulty or participant abilities.

What would settle it

An experiment in which participants denied semantic access achieve innovation success rates statistically indistinguishable from those with full semantic access when all other factors are held constant.

read the original abstract

Cultural evolution allows ideas and technologies to accumulate across generations, reaching their most complex and open-ended form in humans. While social learning enables the transmission of such innovations, the cognitive processes that generate them remain poorly understood. Classical theories typically treat innovation as random variation, a simplification insufficient for explaining the complexity of human cultural evolution. We propose that semantic knowledge-the associations linking concepts to their properties and functions-guides human innovation and drives cumulative culture. To test this, we combined an agent-based model, which examines how semantic knowledge shapes cultural evolutionary dynamics, with a large-scale behavioral experiment (N = 1,243) testing its role in human innovation. Across both approaches, we found that semantic knowledge directed exploration toward meaningful solutions, enhanced innovation success, and enabled generalization from prior discoveries. Moreover, semantic knowledge interacted synergistically with social learning to amplify innovation and accelerate cumulative cultural change. In contrast, experimental participants lacking access to semantic knowledge performed no better than chance, even when social learning was possible, and relied on shallow exploration strategies for innovation. Together, these findings suggest that semantic knowledge is a key cognitive process underpinning human cumulative culture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that semantic knowledge—the associations linking concepts to their properties and functions—guides human innovation and drives cumulative culture. This is tested via an agent-based model of cultural evolutionary dynamics and a behavioral experiment (N=1,243) in which access to semantic knowledge improved innovation success, enabled generalization from prior discoveries, and interacted synergistically with social learning, while participants without semantic access performed at chance level even with social learning available.

Significance. If the results hold, the work would be significant for supplying a concrete cognitive mechanism that directs innovation beyond random variation, thereby helping explain the open-ended complexity of human cumulative culture. The combination of agent-based modeling with a large-scale experiment is a methodological strength that allows both mechanistic exploration and empirical test.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods, Experimental Conditions] Methods, Experimental Conditions: the no-semantic-knowledge manipulation must be specified in sufficient detail to demonstrate that it removes or randomizes concept-property links without also rendering the innovation goal ill-defined or the success metric unrecognizable to participants; otherwise the reported chance-level performance (even with social learning) cannot be cleanly attributed to absence of semantic guidance rather than task incomparability.
  2. [Agent-based Model section] Agent-based Model section: the semantic versus non-semantic regimes must be shown to differ only in the presence of structured concept-property associations and not in the underlying structure or dimensionality of the search space itself, so that performance differences can be ascribed to semantic guidance rather than altered problem difficulty.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results: report effect sizes, confidence intervals, and any data-exclusion rules so that the claimed consistent positive effects across model and experiment can be evaluated for robustness.
  2. [Figures and Tables] Figure legends and table captions should explicitly state sample sizes per condition and whether analyses are pre-registered.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which help clarify key aspects of our methods and modeling approach. We address each major comment point by point below and have made revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods, Experimental Conditions] Methods, Experimental Conditions: the no-semantic-knowledge manipulation must be specified in sufficient detail to demonstrate that it removes or randomizes concept-property links without also rendering the innovation goal ill-defined or the success metric unrecognizable to participants; otherwise the reported chance-level performance (even with social learning) cannot be cleanly attributed to absence of semantic guidance rather than task incomparability.

    Authors: We agree that greater detail is warranted to rule out task incomparability. In the revised manuscript we expand the Methods section with a dedicated subsection that fully specifies the no-semantic-knowledge manipulation: participants received either randomized concept-property pairings or no property information at all, while the innovation goal (achieving a functional outcome) and success metric were presented verbatim and identically across all conditions. We also report pilot data confirming that participants in this condition understood the task goal and success criteria at rates comparable to other groups. These additions allow the observed chance-level performance to be attributed specifically to the absence of semantic guidance rather than an ill-defined task. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Agent-based Model section] Agent-based Model section: the semantic versus non-semantic regimes must be shown to differ only in the presence of structured concept-property associations and not in the underlying structure or dimensionality of the search space itself, so that performance differences can be ascribed to semantic guidance rather than altered problem difficulty.

    Authors: We confirm that the two regimes were constructed to share an identical underlying search space. In the revised Agent-based Model section we explicitly state that both conditions operate on the same representation (same number of concepts, same dimensionality of the feature space, and the same update rules for exploration), with the sole difference being the presence of structured concept-property associations in the semantic regime versus randomized or null associations in the non-semantic regime. We add a supplementary figure that visualizes the shared space and the differing association matrices to make this equivalence transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper combines an agent-based model examining semantic knowledge effects on cultural dynamics with a separate large-scale behavioral experiment (N=1243) testing innovation performance under semantic access vs. control conditions. No equations, parameter-fitting procedures, or self-citations are presented that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction; the model and experiment are described as independent tests rather than tautological reproductions of assumptions. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review conducted from abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the provided text. The work appears to rest on standard assumptions from agent-based modeling and experimental psychology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5732 in / 1091 out tokens · 32920 ms · 2026-05-18T07:16:44.749796+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J. & Henrich, J. The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 , 10918–10925 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter

    Henrich, J. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter . (Princeton University Press, 2015). doi:10.1515/9781400873296

    work page doi:10.1515/9781400873296 2015

  3. [3]

    Legare, C. H. & Nielsen, M. Imitation and Innovation: The Dual Engines of Cultural Learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 , 688–699 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Reilly, J. et al. What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary. Psychon Bull Rev https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7 (2024) doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7

    work page doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7 2024

  5. [5]

    & Henrich, J

    Muthukrishna, M. & Henrich, J. Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371 , 20150192 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    Perry, S. et al. Not by transmission alone: the role of invention in cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376 , 20200049 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [8]

    Singh, M. et al. Beyond social learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376 , 20200050 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [9]

    & Boyd, R

    Derex, M. & Boyd, R. The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nat Commun 6 , 8398 (2015). 27

    work page 2015

  9. [10]

    O., Mesoudi, A

    Brand, C. O., Mesoudi, A. & Smaldino, P. E. Analogy as a Catalyst for Cumulative Cultural Evolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25 , 450–461 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [11]

    C., Holyoak, K

    Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 , 109–130 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [12]

    Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. Causal Cognition in Human and Nonhuman Animals: A Comparative, Critical Review. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58 , 97–118 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [13]

    The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language

    Pinker, S. The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 , 8993–8999 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [14]

    The cognitive bases of human tool use

    Vaesen, K. The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 , 203–218 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [15]

    & Federico, G

    Osiurak, F., Claidière, N. & Federico, G. Bringing cumulative technological culture beyond copying versus reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27 , 30–42 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [16]

    & Reynaud, E

    Osiurak, F. & Reynaud, E. The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 , e156 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [17]

    A., Boyd, R

    Harris, J. A., Boyd, R. & Wood, B. M. The role of causal knowledge in the evolution of traditional technology. Current Biology 31 , 1798-1803.e3 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [18]

    Osiurak, F. et al. Technical reasoning is important for cumulative technological culture. Nat Hum Behav 5 , 1643–1651 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [19]

    Rogers, T. T. & McClelland, J. L. Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach . (MIT Press, 2004). 28

    work page 2004

  19. [20]

    E., Shoben, E

    Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J. & Rips, L. J. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 81 , 214–241 (1974)

    work page 1974

  20. [21]

    Episodic and semantic memory

    Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. in Organization of memory xiii, 423–xiii, 423 (Academic Press, Oxford, England, 1972)

    work page 1972

  21. [24]

    & Evans, J

    Lewis, M., Cahill, A., Madnani, N. & Evans, J. Local similarity and global variability characterize the semantic space of human languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 , e2300986120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [25]

    Beaty, R. E. & Kenett, Y. N. Associative thinking at the core of creativity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27 , 671–683 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [26]

    E., Schacter, D

    Benedek, M., Beaty, R. E., Schacter, D. L. & Kenett, Y. N. The role of memory in creative ideation. Nat Rev Psychol 2 , 246–257 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [27]

    The associative basis of the creative process

    Mednick, S. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69 , 220–232 (1962)

    work page 1962

  25. [28]

    Thibault, S. et al. Tool use and language share syntactic processes and neural patterns in the basal ganglia. Science 374 , eabe0874 (2021). 29

    work page 2021

  26. [29]

    & Mesoudi, A

    Derex, M., Edmiston, P., Lupyan, G. & Mesoudi, A. Trade-offs, control conditions, and alternative designs in the experimental study of cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 , e2322886121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [30]

    & Eriksson, K

    Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S. & Eriksson, K. Modelling the evolution and diversity of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 , 412–423 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [32]

    Piantadosi, S. T. et al. Why concepts are (probably) vectors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 28 , 844–856 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [33]

    Dubey, R., Agrawal, P., Pathak, D., Griffiths, T. L. & Efros, A. A. Investigating Human Priors for Playing Video Games. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.10217 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.10217 2018

  30. [34]

    Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case

    Henrich, J. Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case. American Antiquity 69 , 197–214 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [36]

    A., Steyvers, M

    Kumar, A. A., Steyvers, M. & Balota, D. A. A Critical Review of Network-Based and Distributional Approaches to Semantic Memory Structure and Processes. Topics in Cognitive Science 14 , 54–77 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [37]

    & Vincent, P

    Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 35 , 1798–1828 (2013). 30

    work page 2013

  33. [38]

    M., Meder, B

    Wu, C. M., Meder, B. & Schulz, E. Unifying principles of generalization: past, present, and future. Annual Review of Psychology https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6uz9q (2024) doi:10.31234/osf.io/6uz9q

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/6uz9q 2024

  34. [39]

    1996.Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms

    Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Why Culture Is Common, but Cultural Evolution Is Rare. in The Origin and Evolution of Cultures 52–65 (Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2005). doi:10.1093/oso/9780195165241.003.0004

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780195165241.003.0004 2005

  35. [40]

    Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks

    Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.10084 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.10084 1908

  36. [41]

    J., McElreath, R

    Efferson, C., Lalive, R., Richerson, P. J., McElreath, R. & Lubell, M. Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 29 , 56–64 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [42]

    & Boyd, R

    Henrich, J. & Boyd, R. The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 19 , 215–241 (1998)

    work page 1998

  38. [43]

    Rogers, A. R. Does Biology Constrain Culture? American Anthropologist 90 , 819–831 (1988)

    work page 1988

  39. [44]

    N., Gaissmaier, W

    Witt, A., Toyokawa, W., Lala, K. N., Gaissmaier, W. & Wu, C. M. Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 , e2404928121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [45]

    M., Schulz, E., Speekenbrink, M., Nelson, J

    Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Speekenbrink, M., Nelson, J. D. & Meder, B. Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces. Nat Hum Behav 2 , 915–924 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [46]

    & Jones, B

    Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M. & Jones, B. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science 342 , 468–472 (2013). 31

    work page 2013

  42. [47]

    Weitzman, M. L. Recombinant Growth*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 , 331–360 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [48]

    & Bandettini, P

    Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M. & Bandettini, P. Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2 , 1–28 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [49]

    & Fischer, P

    Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N. & Fischer, P. Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem. Machine Learning 47 , 235–256 (2002)

    work page 2002

  45. [50]

    Gershman, S. J. Deconstructing the human algorithms for exploration. Cognition 173 , 34–42 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [51]

    & Griffiths, T

    Kuperwajs, I., Van Opheusden, B., Russek, E. & Griffiths, T. Learning from rewards and social information in naturalistic strategic behavior. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d8zje (2024)

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/d8zje 2024

  47. [52]

    & Lindström, B

    Schultner, D., Molleman, L. & Lindström, B. Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies. Nature Human Behaviour 1–16 (2025) doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02269-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02269-4 2025

  48. [53]

    & Goodman, N

    Prystawski, B., Arumugam, D. & Goodman, N. Cultural reinforcement learning: a framework for modeling cumulative culture on a limited channel. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q4tz8 (2023)

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/q4tz8 2023

  49. [54]

    Holding, T., Smaldino, P. E. & Brand, C. (Lotty). Analogies evolve by increasing transmission fidelity in the communication of complex information. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/aqc5f (2024)

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/aqc5f 2024

  50. [55]

    Cheng, X. et al. The conceptual structure of human relationships across modern and historical cultures. Nature Human Behaviour 9 , 1162–1175 (2025). 32

    work page 2025

  51. [56]

    Jackson, J. C. et al. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science 366 , 1517–1522 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [57]

    Youn, H., Strumsky, D., Bettencourt, L. M. A. & Lobo, J. Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12 , 20150272 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [58]

    M., Chater, N

    Raafat, R. M., Chater, N. & Frith, C. Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 , 420–428 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [59]

    & Laland, K

    Toyokawa, W., Whalen, A. & Laland, K. N. Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive crowds. Nat Hum Behav 3 , 183–193 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [60]

    & Zhou, W.-X

    Sornette, D., Woodard, R. & Zhou, W.-X. The 2006–2008 oil bubble: Evidence of speculation, and prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388 , 1571–1576 (2009)

    work page 2006

  56. [61]

    Arafat, S. M. Y. et al. Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19). Psychiatry Research 289 , 113061 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [62]

    & Parisi, D

    Acerbi, A. & Parisi, D. Cultural transmission between and within generations. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20175 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [63]

    T., Austerweil, J

    Abbott, J. T., Austerweil, J. L. & Griffiths, T. L. Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging. Psychological Review 122 , 558–569 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [64]

    Lopez-Persem, A. et al. How subjective idea valuation energizes and guides creative idea generation. Am Psychol 79 , 403–422 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [65]

    Doshi, A. R. & Hauser, O. P. Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances 10 , eadn5290 (2024). 33

    work page 2024

  61. [66]

    & Christakis, N

    Shirado, H. & Christakis, N. A. Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments. Nature 545, 370–374 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [67]

    Ueshima, A., Jones, M. I. & Christakis, N. A. Simple autonomous agents can enhance creative semantic discovery by human groups. Nat Commun 15, 5212 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [68]

    W., Shimojo, S

    Lee, S. W., Shimojo, S. & O’Doherty, J. P . Neural Computations Underlying Arbitration between Model-Based and Model-free Learning. Neuron 81, 687–699 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [69]

    & Galesic, M

    Barkoczi, D. & Galesic, M. Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance. Nat Commun 7, 13109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [70]

    E., Lukaszewski, A., von Rueden, C

    Smaldino, P . E., Lukaszewski, A., von Rueden, C. & Gurven, M. Niche diversity can explain cross-cultural differences in personality structure. Nat Hum Behav 3, 1276–1283 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [71]

    Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality

    Mikolov, T ., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. & Dean, J. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.4546 (2013)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 2013

  67. [72]

    Dudko, O. K. Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity. J Stat Phys 126, 429–430 (2007)

    work page 2007

  68. [73]

    Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal 9, 378–400 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [74]

    & Walker, S

    Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [75]

    Christensen, R. H. B. Ordinal—Regression Models for Ordinal Data. (2023). 34 Supplementary Information for Semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution Figure S1. Sensitivity analysis: Effect of innovation task structure variations on CCE. (a) Alternative task tree structures were generated by randomly altering innovation rules. Each...

    work page 2023

  71. [76]

    Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case

    Henrich, J. Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case. Am. antiq. 69 , 197–214 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [77]

    & Boyd, R

    Derex, M. & Boyd, R. The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nat Commun 6 , 8398 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [78]

    Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space

    Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. & Dean, J. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781 (2013)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 2013

  74. [79]

    Kumar, A. A. Semantic memory: A review of methods, models, and current challenges. Psychon Bull Rev 28 , 40–80 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [80]

    S., Vigliocco, G

    Rotaru, A. S., Vigliocco, G. & Frank, S. L. Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing. Cognitive Science 42 , 2890–2917 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [81]

    Brown, K. S. et al. Investigating the Extent to which Distributional Semantic Models Capture a Broad Range of Semantic Relations. Cognitive Science 47 , e13291 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [82]

    & Courville, A

    Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning . (MIT Press, 2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [83]

    Kendal, R. L. et al. Social Learning Strategies: Bridge-Building between Fields. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22 , 651–665 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [84]

    The OpenCV Library

    Bradski, G. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal: Software Tools for the Professional Programmer 25 , 120–123 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [85]

    van der et al

    Walt, S. van der et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2 , e453 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.