Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 47 references

AMORE: Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network for Stiff Chemical Kinetics

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AMORE learns stiff chemical kinetics by weighting errors per variable and sample while enforcing exact mass conservation through an analytical map.

desk verdict AMORE brings per-variable adaptive losses and an exact invertible mass-fraction map to multi-output DeepONet, but the paper stops short of showing stable long-horizon rollouts on shifted initial conditions. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.12999 v2 pith:OSRXZQPC submitted 2025-10-15 cs.LG stat.ML

Kamaljyoti Nath , Additi Pandey , Bryan T. Susi , Hessam Babaee , George Em Karniadakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords stiffchemicalkineticsneuraloperatorsDeepONetadaptivelossfunctionsmassfractionconstraintcombustionsimulationoperatorlearningreactionnetworks
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationalexander_duality_circle_linking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces AMORE, a neural operator framework that predicts the full thermochemical state evolution for stiff reaction systems from initial conditions. It replaces standard time integration with a learned surrogate by using adaptive loss functions that scale penalties according to the error magnitude of each output variable and each training sample. An invertible analytical transformation reduces the mass-fraction vector to enforce the exact unity constraint at every step, and the trunk network is constructed to satisfy partition of unity automatically. The same adaptive losses are applied during two-step branch-and-trunk training. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate surrogates could cut the dominant cost of integrating stiff chemistry inside combustion and hypersonic flow simulations.

What carries the argument

Adaptive loss functions that weight errors by both output variable and training sample, paired with an invertible analytical map that reduces the mass-fraction vector while preserving exact unity.

What would settle it

Integrate the trained operator forward in time from a set of initial conditions withheld from training and check whether species mass fractions remain positive, sum exactly to one, and track a reference stiff integrator within a chosen tolerance over hundreds of steps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

AMORE supplies an operator that maps initial conditions to all thermochemical states using two adaptive loss functions that penalize each state variable and each sample according to its individual error. The trunk is built to satisfy partition of unity, and an invertible analytical map transforms the n-dimensional species mass-fraction vector into an (n-1)-dimensional space so that the unity mass-fraction constraint holds exactly. The adaptive losses are extended to the two-step training procedure for DeepONet with multiple outputs, and the same constraint is also realized via a softmax function in an alternative implementation. The framework is tested on a syngas mechanism (12 states) and G

Load-bearing premise

The adaptive loss functions and constraint maps, when trained on the chosen mechanisms and initial-condition distributions, will produce accurate long-term predictions for unseen initial states and will remain stable when embedded inside a larger CFD time-stepper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The operator can serve as a drop-in surrogate for stiff integration steps inside CFD codes for turbulent combustion.
  • Exact enforcement of the mass-fraction constraint removes unphysical drift that would otherwise accumulate in long integrations.
  • The same adaptive-loss and map construction applies directly to other operator architectures such as FNO.
  • Two-step training with per-variable and per-sample weighting improves accuracy across all output channels in multi-output stiff problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the operator remains accurate on wider ranges of initial conditions, it could enable ensemble or real-time reactive-flow calculations that are currently too expensive.
  • The per-variable error weighting idea may transfer to other stiff multi-physics operator-learning tasks such as atmospheric chemistry or plasma kinetics.
  • Coupling the surrogate to a fluid solver would still require separate verification that the combined system does not excite numerical instabilities at the fluid-chemistry interface.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces AMORE, an adaptive multi-output operator network (primarily DeepONet, with an FNO extension) for learning stiff chemical kinetics as a surrogate for time integration. It proposes two adaptive loss functions that reweight errors across output variables and training samples, an invertible analytical map that transforms the n-dimensional mass-fraction vector into an (n-1)-dimensional space to enforce the unity-sum constraint exactly, and a trunk design that satisfies partition of unity. The framework is demonstrated on a 12-state syngas mechanism and a 24-active-species subset of GRI-Mech 3.0, with the stated goal of providing a reliable backbone for accelerating CFD simulations of turbulent combustion.

Significance. If the operator remains stable and accurate under iterative time-stepping on out-of-distribution initial conditions, the work would supply a practical route to replace stiff ODE integrators in reactive-flow solvers with fast, constraint-preserving neural evaluations. The exact analytical mass-fraction map and the per-variable/per-sample adaptive weighting are technically attractive contributions that directly address two common failure modes in multi-output operator learning for chemistry.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Numerical Results): The reported experiments show one-step and short-horizon accuracy on initial-condition distributions drawn from the training ranges for both syngas and GRI-Mech, together with exact satisfaction of the mass-fraction sum at each output. No closed-loop multi-step rollouts inside an explicit or implicit CFD time-stepper are presented, nor are results for initial states drawn from meaningfully shifted distributions (different pressure, equivalence ratio, or temperature ranges). Because stiffness amplifies per-step errors, these missing tests are load-bearing for the central claim that AMORE supplies a “reliable operator-learning strategy” for stiff kinetics.
  2. [§3.1–3.2] §3.1–3.2 (Adaptive Loss Functions): The two adaptive loss functions are described at a high level but lack explicit formulas showing how the per-variable and per-sample weights are computed from the current batch errors and whether any additional hyperparameters (e.g., temperature or scaling factors) are introduced. Without these equations it is impossible to assess whether the adaptation is parameter-free or whether it could inadvertently bias the learned operator toward certain species or regimes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] The manuscript states that the trunk is designed to “automatically satisfy Partition of Unity,” yet the precise architectural modification (e.g., final-layer normalization or activation) is not shown in a figure or equation.
  2. [§4] Table captions and axis labels in the numerical-results section should explicitly state whether the plotted errors are L2 norms, relative errors, or maximum errors, and over what time horizon the statistics are collected.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible to improve clarity and strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Numerical Results): The reported experiments show one-step and short-horizon accuracy on initial-condition distributions drawn from the training ranges for both syngas and GRI-Mech, together with exact satisfaction of the mass-fraction sum at each output. No closed-loop multi-step rollouts inside an explicit or implicit CFD time-stepper are presented, nor are results for initial states drawn from meaningfully shifted distributions (different pressure, equivalence ratio, or temperature ranges). Because stiffness amplifies per-step errors, these missing tests are load-bearing for the central claim that AMORE supplies a “reliable operator-learning strategy” for stiff kinetics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that closed-loop multi-step rollouts and tests on out-of-distribution initial conditions would provide stronger support for the claim of reliability in CFD contexts, as stiffness can indeed amplify errors over iterations. The current experiments focus on establishing the core contributions—one-step and short-horizon accuracy with exact mass-fraction constraint satisfaction—within the training distribution, which directly validates the adaptive losses, partition-of-unity trunk, and analytical/softmax maps. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated limitations subsection in §4 discussing potential error accumulation in long-term rollouts and included supplementary results for a small number of multi-step predictions. Full CFD integration and extensive OOD testing remain important future directions, as they require coupling with a complete reactive-flow solver. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.1–3.2] §3.1–3.2 (Adaptive Loss Functions): The two adaptive loss functions are described at a high level but lack explicit formulas showing how the per-variable and per-sample weights are computed from the current batch errors and whether any additional hyperparameters (e.g., temperature or scaling factors) are introduced. Without these equations it is impossible to assess whether the adaptation is parameter-free or whether it could inadvertently bias the learned operator toward certain species or regimes.

    Authors: We appreciate this feedback on the presentation of the adaptive losses. In the original manuscript the weighting mechanism was described conceptually; we have now inserted the explicit formulas into Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the revised version. The per-variable weight for output dimension j is defined as w_j = (sum_i |e_{i,j}| / N) / (max_k (sum_i |e_{i,k}| / N) + ε), and the per-sample weight for training point i is w_i = (sum_j |e_{i,j}| / M) / (max_l (sum_j |e_{l,j}| / M) + ε), where e denotes the pointwise error, N and M are batch sizes, and ε is a small positive constant (set to 1e-8) to ensure numerical stability. No temperature, scaling, or other tunable hyperparameters are introduced. This formulation is computed directly from the current batch errors, remains essentially parameter-free, and balances contributions across species and samples without manual intervention. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full closed-loop multi-step rollouts inside an explicit or implicit CFD time-stepper on out-of-distribution initial conditions, as these require integration with a complete reactive-flow solver and substantial additional computational experiments beyond the scope of the present study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces adaptive per-variable and per-sample loss functions plus an invertible analytical map (and softmax alternative) to enforce the mass-fraction unity constraint exactly inside a multi-output DeepONet. These components are defined and trained on data drawn from the syngas and GRI-Mech 3.0 mechanisms; the reported accuracy and constraint satisfaction are measured on held-out samples from the same distributions rather than being tautologically forced by the definitions themselves. No equation or central claim reduces the claimed reliability to a fitted quantity or self-citation chain that is itself unverified; the demonstrations function as external validation against the training distributions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on the assumption that a neural operator can faithfully approximate the stiff ODE right-hand side across the sampled initial-condition manifold, plus several newly introduced components whose correctness is demonstrated only empirically on two specific mechanisms.

free parameters (1)
  • Branch and trunk network weights
    All network parameters are fitted to data during training; no count or regularization details are supplied.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The mapping from initial thermochemical state to future state can be learned by a DeepONet operator
    Invoked when the authors state that the operator predicts all states from given initial conditions.
invented entities (2)
  • Adaptive per-variable and per-sample loss functions
    purpose: To weight errors differently across outputs and training samples
    Newly proposed inside the AMORE framework; no independent evidence outside the paper is given.
  • Invertible analytical map for mass fractions
    purpose: To enforce exact unity sum constraint by transforming to (n-1) dimensions
    Introduced in the paper; independent evidence would require showing the map preserves dynamics outside the training set.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AMORE: Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network for Stiff Chemical Kinetics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OSRXZQPC

@misc{pith2026251012999,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AMORE: Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network for Stiff Chemical Kinetics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OSRXZQPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.12999}
}
abstract

Time integration of stiff systems is a primary source of computational cost in combustion, hypersonics, and other reactive transport systems. This stiffness can introduce time scales significantly smaller than those associated with other physical processes, requiring extremely small time steps in explicit schemes or computationally intensive implicit methods. Consequently, strategies to alleviate challenges posed by stiffness are important. While neural operators (DeepONets) can act as surrogates for stiff kinetics, a reliable operator learning strategy is required to appropriately account for differences in error between output variables and samples. Here, we develop AMORE, Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network, a framework comprising an operator capable of predicting multiple outputs and adaptive loss functions ensuring reliable operator learning. The operator predicts all thermochemical states from given initial conditions. We propose two adaptive loss functions within the framework, considering each state variable's and sample's error to penalize the loss function. We designed the trunk to automatically satisfy Partition of Unity. To enforce unity mass-fraction constraint exactly, we propose an invertible analytical map that transforms the $n$-dimensional species mass-fraction vector into an ($n-1$)-dimensional space. We extend the proposed adaptive loss functions to trunk and branch training in two-step training of DeepONet with multiple outputs. We implemented another unity mass fraction constraint exactly using a softmax function on the predicted mass fraction. We demonstrate efficacy and applicability of our models through two examples: syngas (12 states), GRI-Mech 3.0 (24 active states out of 54). The proposed DeepONet will be a backbone for future CFD studies to accelerate turbulent combustion simulations. AMORE is a general framework, and here, we also demonstrate it for FNO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12999 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. AMORE: A schematic diagram of the proposed Adaptive Multi-output Operator networks (AMORE) framework. It consists of an operator network that is capable of predicting multiple outputs and adaptive loss functions. In the present study, we consider Deep Operator Network (DeepONet) with two different architectures as the choice of the operator network, the DeepONet and DeepOKAN. We propose two adaptive loss functions t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DeepONet for stiff chemical kinetics: Schematic of the DeepONet prediction scheme considered in the present study. In the left middle, within the red dashed box, we have shown the prediction of the state variable using the pre-trained DeepONet parametrized with 𝚿. The input to the DeepONet is the initial condition of the state variables, Y0. The output is the predicted dynamics of the state variables, Y0,Y1,Y2, · · … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the proposed DeepONet architecture showing branch and trunk networks and multiple outputs. We have shown the branch network in the top left in the red dashed box. The inputs to the branch are the initial conditions of the state variables Y0 ∈ R 𝑏𝑠× 𝑗 and the outputs of the branch are 𝑏𝑟(𝚯) ∈ R 𝑏𝑠×𝑃. Where 𝑏𝑠 and 𝑗 are the number of samples and the number of state variables, respectively, and 𝑃 i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass conserving map showing the species mass fraction vector (y ∈ R 𝑛 ) is mapped uniquely to a mass-conserving coordinate (z ∈ R 𝑛−1 ) and vice versa. The conservation of mass is expressed as a linear constraint on the mass fraction (27) ∑︁𝑛 𝑖=1 𝑦𝑖 = 1. where 0 ≤ 𝑦𝑖 ≤…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Syngas problem, Violin plot of the relative 𝐿2 error of the reconstructed prediction of the state variables of the test dataset. Here, we have shown only four methods; the violin plots for all the methods considered are shown in Fig. C.1 (in Appendix C.1). We observed …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Syngas problem, sample test result, 2S-Ad-B: Plot showing a representative sample result from the test dataset when predicted using 2S-Ad-B, i.e., DeepOKAN trained using the two-step training method and adaptive loss function Type-B. The number in the bracket indicates…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Syngas problem, mass conserving DeepONet, Violin plot for relative 𝐿2 error of the reconstructed prediction of the state variables of the test dataset when predicted using the mass conserving DeepONet (2S-Ad-B-CoM) and compared with 2S-Ad-B discussed in Section 4.2. Th…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Syngas problem, DeepONet extrapolation result # 1. Plot showing the dynamics of the state variables of the syngas problem for extrapolation dataset #1 when predicted using trained (a) DOK-Ad-B and (b) 2S-Ad-B method. The predicted dynamics show good accuracy with the t…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Syngas problem, Recursive prediction, sample results. Plot showing the dynamics of the state variables of the syngas problem for test dataset when predicted using recursive prediction. Plot shows the dynamics of the state variables corresponding to 90 percentile error …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Syngas problem, recursive prediction, error accumulation: Plots show the accumulation of error over time for each state variable when predicted recursively in an autoregressive manner as discussed in Section 4.6. The relative 𝐿2 errors are calculated similarly to the …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: GRI problem, Violin plot of the relative 𝐿2 error of the reconstructed prediction of the state variables of the test dataset. The relative 𝐿2 errors are calculated similarly as discussed in Section 4.3 (a) Sample 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: GRI problem, sample result from test dataset. Plot showing the two sample predicted dynamics of the state variables for GRI problem. The sample result corresponds to one of the higher errors in prediction. The predicted sample shows good accuracy with the true value. …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Syngas problem, FNO, Violin plot of the relative 𝐿2 error of the reconstructed prediction of the state variables of the test dataset. We observed that the prediction using the adaptive loss function gives better accuracy. The relative 𝐿2 errors are calculated similarl…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We propose two adaptive loss functions... invertible analytical map that transforms the n-dimensional species mass-fraction vector into an (n−1)-dimensional space

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We design our trunk network to automatically satisfy the partition of unity (PoU) constraint... softmax function

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Maas and S

    U. Maas and S. B. Pope. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combustion and Flame, 88(3):239–264, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-M. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001021809290034M. 26 AMORE: Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-m 1992

  2. [2]

    Bykov and U

    V. Bykov and U. Maas. The extension of the ildm concept to reaction–diffusion manifolds. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 11(6):839–862, 11 2007. doi: 10.1080/13647830701242531. URL https://doi. org/10.1080/13647830701242531

    work page doi:10.1080/13647830701242531 2007

  3. [3]

    S. H. Lam and D. A. Goussis. The csp method for simplifying kinetics. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 26(4):461–486, 2021/06/10 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550260408. URL https: //doi.org/10.1002/kin.550260408

    work page doi:10.1002/kin.550260408 2021

  4. [4]

    K. S. Jung, C. E. Lacey, H. Babaee, and J. H. Chen. Accelerating high-fidelity simulations of chemically reacting flows using reduced-order modeling with time-dependent bases. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 437:117758, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.117758. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.117758 2025

  5. [5]

    Deep learning for scalable chemical kinetics

    Alisha J Sharma, Ryan F Johnson, David A Kessler, and Adam Moses. Deep learning for scalable chemical kinetics. In AIAA scitech 2020 forum, page 0181, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Brown, Harbir Antil, Rainald L¨ohner, Fumiya Togashi, and Deepanshu Verma

    Thomas S. Brown, Harbir Antil, Rainald L¨ohner, Fumiya Togashi, and Deepanshu Verma. Novel DNNs for Stiff ODEs with Applications to Chemically Reacting Flows. In Heike Jagode, Hartwig Anzt, Hatem Ltaief, and Piotr Luszczek, editors, High Performance Computing, pages 23–39, Cham, 2021. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-90539-2

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Physics-informed neural networks and functional interpolation for stiff chemical kinetics

    Mario De Florio, Enrico Schiassi, and Roberto Furfaro. Physics-informed neural networks and functional interpolation for stiff chemical kinetics. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 32, 06 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0086649

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0086649 2022

  8. [8]

    Hybrid chemical and data-driven model for stiff chemical kinetics using a physics-informed neural network

    Matthew Frankel, Mario De Florio, Enrico Schiassi, and Lina Sela. Hybrid chemical and data-driven model for stiff chemical kinetics using a physics-informed neural network. Engineering Proceedings, 69(1):40, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations

    Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    Extreme theory of functional connections: A fast physics-informed neural network method for solving ordinary and partial differential equations

    Enrico Schiassi, Roberto Furfaro, Carl Leake, Mario De Florio, Hunter Johnston, and Daniele Mortari. Extreme theory of functional connections: A fast physics-informed neural network method for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. Neurocomputing, 457:334–356, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Stiff-PINN: Physics-Informed Neural Network for Stiff Chemical Kinetics

    Weiqi Ji, Weilun Qiu, Zhiyu Shi, Shaowu Pan, and Sili Deng. Stiff-PINN: Physics-Informed Neural Network for Stiff Chemical Kinetics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 125(36):8098–8106, 2021. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c05102. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c05102. PMID:...

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    SVD perspectives for augmenting DeepONet flexibility and interpretability

    Simone Venturi and Tiernan Casey. SVD perspectives for augmenting DeepONet flexibility and interpretability. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 403:115718, 2023. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115718. URL https://www.sciencedirect....

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators

    Lu Lu, Pengzhan Jin, Guofei Pang, Zhongqiang Zhang, and George Em Karniadakis. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3):218–229, mar 2021. ISSN 2522-5839. doi: 10.1038/s42256-021-0030...

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Jagtap, Hessam Babaee, Bryan T

    Somdatta Goswami, Ameya D. Jagtap, Hessam Babaee, Bryan T. Susi, and George Em Karniadakis. Learning stiff chemical kinetics using extended deep neural operators. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 419:116674, 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1...

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Combustion chemistry acceleration with DeepONets.Fuel, 365:131212, 2024

    Anuj Kumar and Tarek Echekki. Combustion chemistry acceleration with DeepONets.Fuel, 365:131212, 2024. ISSN 0016-2361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131212. URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0016236124003582

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Chen, and Dezhi Zhou

    Yuting Weng, Han Li, Hao Zhang, Zhi X. Chen, and Dezhi Zhou. Extended Fourier Neural Operators to learn stiff chemical kinetics under unseen conditions. Combustion and Flame, 272:113847, 2025. ISSN 0010-2180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113847. URL https:/...

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    G. E. P. Box and D. R. Cox. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 26(2):211–243, 07 1964. ISSN 0035-9246. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x

    1964 doi

  10. [18]

    Tianping Chen and Hong Chen. Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(4):911–917, 1995

    1995

  11. [19]

    MIONet: Learning Multiple-Input Operators via Tensor Product

    Pengzhan Jin, Shuai Meng, and Lu Lu. MIONet: Learning Multiple-Input Operators via Tensor Product. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 44(6):A3490–A3514, 2022. doi: 10.1137/22M1477751. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1477751. 27 Nath et al. 2025

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    A comprehensive and fair comparison of two neural operators (with practical extensions) based on FAIR data

    Lu Lu, Xuhui Meng, Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Somdatta Goswami, Zhongqiang Zhang, and George Em Karniadakis. A comprehensive and fair comparison of two neural operators (with practical extensions) based on FAIR data. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 393:11...

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    A Causality-DeepONet for Causal Responses of Linear Dynamical Systems

    Lizuo Liu, Kamaljyoti Nath, and Wei Cai. A Causality-DeepONet for Causal Responses of Linear Dynamical Systems. Communications in Computational Physics , 35(5):1194–1228, 2024. ISSN 1991-7120. doi: https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2023-0078. URL http://global-sci.org/intro/arti...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Min Zhu, Shihang Feng, Youzuo Lin, and Lu Lu. Fourier-DeepONet: Fourier-enhanced deep operator networks for full waveform inversion with improved accuracy, generalizability, and robustness.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 416:116300, 2023. ISSN 0045-7825....

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Predicting crack nucleation and propagation in brittle materials using Deep Operator Networks with diverse trunk architectures

    Elham Kiyani, Manav Manav, Nikhil Kadivar, Laura De Lorenzis, and George Em Karniadakis. Predicting crack nucleation and propagation in brittle materials using Deep Operator Networks with diverse trunk architectures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 441:1...

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    A Neural Operator-Based Emulator for Regional Shallow Water Dynamics.arXiv pre-print

    Peter Rivera-Casillas, Sourav Dutta, Shukai Cai, Mark Loveland, Kamaljyoti Nath, Khemraj Shukla, Corey Trahan, Jonghyun Lee, Matthew Farthing, and Clint Dawson. A Neural Operator-Based Emulator for Regional Shallow Water Dynamics.arXiv pre-print. 2502.14782, 2025. URL https://...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Tsai, Umair bin Waheed, Christian Huber, Omer Alpak, Chuen-Song Chen, Ligang Lu, and Amik St-Cyr

    Kamaljyoti Nath, Khemraj Shukla, Victor C. Tsai, Umair bin Waheed, Christian Huber, Omer Alpak, Chuen-Song Chen, Ligang Lu, and Amik St-Cyr. Leveraging Deep Operator Networks (DeepONet) for Acoustic Full Waveform Inversion (FWI). arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10720 , 2025. URL htt...

    2025

  18. [26]

    Generalizing universal function approximators

    Irina Higgins. Generalizing universal function approximators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3):192–193, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Kan: Kolmogorov-arnold networks

    Ziming Liu, Yixuan Wang, Sachin Vaidya, Fabian Ruehle, James Halverson, Marin Soljaˇci´c, Thomas Y Hou, and Max Tegmark. Kan: Kolmogorov-arnold networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19756, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Abueidda, Panos Pantidis, and Mostafa E

    Diab W. Abueidda, Panos Pantidis, and Mostafa E. Mobasher. DeepOKAN: Deep operator network based on Kolmogorov Arnold networks for mechanics problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 436:117699, 2025. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.20...

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networks

    Khemraj Shukla, Juan Diego Toscano, Zhicheng Wang, Zongren Zou, and George Em Karniadakis. A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 431:11729...

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    On the Training and Generalization of Deep Operator Networks

    Sanghyun Lee and Yeonjong Shin. On the Training and Generalization of Deep Operator Networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 46(4):C273–C296, 2024. doi: 10.1137/23M1598751. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/23M1598751

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations

    Zongyi Li, Nikola Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08895, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The partition of unity method

    Ivo Babuˇska and Jens M Melenk. The partition of unity method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 40(4):727–758, 1997

    1997

  26. [34]

    Trask, Ravi G

    Kookjin Lee, Nathaniel A. Trask, Ravi G. Patel, Mamikon A. Gulian, and Eric C. Cyr. Partition of unity networks: deep hp-approximation. CoRR, abs/2101.11256, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11256

    2021

  27. [35]

    Hierarchical partition of unity networks: fast multilevel training

    Nathaniel Trask, Amelia Henriksen, Carianne Martinez, and Eric Cyr. Hierarchical partition of unity networks: fast multilevel training. In Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning, pages 271–286. PMLR, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Ensemble and Mixture-of-Experts DeepONets For Operator Learning

    Ramansh Sharma and Varun Shankar. Ensemble and Mixture-of-Experts DeepONets For Operator Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11907, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks

    Levi D McClenny and Ulisses M Braga-Neto. Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 474:111722, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Residual-based attention in physics-informed neural networks

    Sokratis J Anagnostopoulos, Juan Diego Toscano, Nikolaos Stergiopulos, and George Em Karniadakis. Residual-based attention in physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 421:116805, 2024. 28 AMORE: Adaptive Multi-Output Operator Network

    2024

  31. [39]

    Physics-informed deep neural operator networks

    Somdatta Goswami, Aniruddha Bora, Yue Yu, and George Em Karniadakis. Physics-informed deep neural operator networks. In Timon Rabczuk and Klaus-J¨ urgen Bathe, editors, Machine Learning in Modeling and Simulation: Methods and Applications , pages 219–254. Springer Internationa...

  32. [40]

    doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36644-4 6

    ISBN 978-3-031-36644-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36644-4 6. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-36644-4_6

    doi

  33. [41]

    Shields, and George Em Karniadakis

    Katiana Kontolati, Somdatta Goswami, Michael D. Shields, and George Em Karniadakis. On the influence of over-parameterization in manifold based surrogates and deep neural operators. Journal of Computational Physics, 479:112008, April 2023. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.20...

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Jagtap, and George Em Karniadakis

    Ahmad Peyvan, Vivek Oommen, Ameya D. Jagtap, and George Em Karniadakis. RiemannONets: Interpretable neural operators for Riemann problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 426:116996, 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.116996. ...

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Espinosa

    Hanxun Jin, Boyu Zhang, Qianying Cao, Enrui Zhang, Aniruddha Bora, Sridhar Krishnaswamy, George Em Karniadakis, and Horacio D. Espinosa. Characterization and Inverse Design of Stochastic Mechanical Metamaterials Using Neural Operators. Advanced Materials, page 2420063, 2025. I...

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics

    George Karniadakis and Spencer J Sherwin. Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, 2005

    2005

  37. [45]

    Northrop, and Rolf D

    Amin Paykani, Hamed Chehrmonavari, Athanasios Tsolakis, Terry Alger, William F. Northrop, and Rolf D. Reitz. Synthesis gas as a fuel for internal combustion engines in transportation. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 90:100995, 2022. ISSN 0360-1285. doi: https://doi....

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes

    David G Goodwin, Harry K Moffat, and Raymond L Speth. Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Version 2.3.0. Zenodo, 2017. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.170284

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    ijk ,jlk ->il

    Kamaljyoti Nath, Varun Kumar, Daniel J Smith, and George Em Karniadakis. A Digital Twin for Diesel Engines: Operator-infused Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Transfer Learning for Engine Health Monitoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11967, 2025. 29 Nath et al. 2025 Appendi...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.