pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.13752 · v2 · pith:M3HOWJOHnew · submitted 2025-10-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Effects of primordial magnetic fields on 21 cm multifrequency angular power spectra

Kerstin E. Kunze This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords primordial magnetic fields21 cm signalangular power spectracosmological modelsmatter power spectrumradio astronomySKA telescope
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multifrequency angular power spectra of the 21 cm line can probe primordial magnetic fields before decoupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes multifrequency angular power spectra for the redshifted 21 cm signal in cosmological models that include both the standard adiabatic curvature perturbations and compensated modes induced by primordial magnetic fields. These fields increase the amplitude of the linear matter power spectrum at small scales. Simulated temperature maps based on the modified power spectra are used to calculate cross-spectra between different frequency bands corresponding to different redshifts. Examples are provided for magnetic field strengths of 4 nG with spectral indices of -2.9 and -2.5, evaluated at frequencies relevant to uGMRT, MeerKAT, and SKA1-MID, with resulting signal-to-noise ratios under the assumption of only system noise. A reader would care because this approach could offer constraints on the strength and evolution of early magnetic fields that are otherwise difficult to access.

Core claim

Multifrequency angular power spectra could provide a new possibility to probe primordial magnetic fields including its evolution present before decoupling. First multifrequency angular power spectra of the 21 cm line signal are obtained for cosmological models including the adiabatic, primordial curvature mode as well as the compensated magnetic mode for different values of the magnetic field parameters. Temperature maps are simulated with the modified linear matter power spectra for magnetic fields with magnetic field strength B0=4 nG and spectral indices nB=-2.9 and nB=-2.5. These spectra are calculated for frequency ranges set around central frequencies of uGMRT Band 3 data as well asMeer

What carries the argument

The compensated magnetic mode in the linear matter power spectrum, which dominates over the adiabatic mode on small scales and modifies the 21 cm temperature fluctuations used to build the multifrequency angular power spectra.

If this is right

  • The power spectra differ from the no-magnetic-field case due to the enhanced small-scale power.
  • Signal-to-noise ratios are calculated for specific telescope bands using only system noise.
  • The results suggest potential to constrain magnetic field parameters with SKA1-MID.
  • This holds within the simple model neglecting foregrounds and non-linear effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Non-linear evolution of the matter power spectrum could alter the predicted spectra at late times.
  • Cross-correlations with other cosmological probes like CMB might strengthen constraints on the magnetic field spectrum.
  • Extending the analysis to include realistic foreground removal techniques would test the robustness for actual observations.

Load-bearing premise

Foreground contamination can be neglected and the temperature maps arise solely from the modified linear matter power spectrum without contributions from non-linear evolution or astrophysical sources.

What would settle it

Observing no difference in the multifrequency angular power spectra between models with and without primordial magnetic fields of strength 4 nG at the scales probed by SKA1-MID would challenge the claim that these spectra can effectively constrain the fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13752 by Kerstin E. Kunze.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Absolute values of the multi frequency angular power spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Signal-over-noise ratios of the multi frequency angular po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cumulative signal-over-noise ratios of the multi frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The redshifted cosmic 21 cm line signal of neutral hydrogen provides the possibility to constrain the matter power spectrum. Cross correlating temperature maps at different frequencies (corresponding to different redshifts along the line of sight) allows to determine multifrequency angular power spectra. Primordial magnetic fields raise the amplitude of the linear matter power spectrum on small scales dominating over the contribution of the adiabatic primordial curvature mode. Multifrequency angular power spectra could provide a new possibility to probe primordial magnetic fields including its evolution present before decoupling. Here first multifrequency angular power spectra of the 21 cm line signal are obtained for cosmological models including the adiabatic, primordial curvature mode as well as the compensated magnetic mode for different values of the magnetic field parameters. For this temperature maps are simulated with the modified linear matter power spectra for magnetic fields with magnetic field strength $B_0=4$ nG and spectral indices $n_B=-2.9$ and $n_B=-2.5$, respectively, which have been chosen as examples. Moreover foregrounds have not been taken into account. As examples these multifrequency angular power spectra have been calculated for frequency ranges set around central frequencies of uGMRT Band 3 data as well as MeerKAT L band data. For these using only system noise signal-over-noise ratios are obtained as well as for SKA1-MID which is part of the currently under construction SKAO. Within this simple model results of this first study seem to be promising for constraining magnetic field parameters especially for SKA1-MID.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper computes multifrequency angular power spectra of the redshifted 21 cm signal for cosmological models that include both the adiabatic curvature mode and the compensated magnetic mode induced by primordial magnetic fields (PMF). Temperature maps are generated from the PMF-modified linear matter power spectrum for example parameters B_0 = 4 nG with n_B = -2.9 and n_B = -2.5; spectra are evaluated in frequency bands around uGMRT Band 3 and MeerKAT L-band, and signal-to-noise ratios (including for SKA1-MID) are reported using only instrumental noise. The authors conclude that, within this simplified model that neglects foregrounds, the approach appears promising for constraining PMF parameters.

Significance. If the central results survive the inclusion of realistic foregrounds and non-linear evolution, the work would demonstrate a new observable—multifrequency angular power spectra—that is sensitive to the small-scale enhancement of the matter power spectrum by compensated magnetic modes, thereby offering an independent route to probe PMF strength and spectral index with forthcoming 21 cm arrays such as SKA1-MID.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section on S/N ratios for SKA1-MID] The signal-to-noise ratios presented for SKA1-MID (and the associated claim that constraints on B_0 and n_B appear promising) rest exclusively on system noise; the manuscript explicitly states that foregrounds have not been included. Because foregrounds dominate 21 cm observations and their subtraction is non-trivial, the reported detectability cannot be taken as evidence that the compensated magnetic mode remains distinguishable after realistic foreground removal.
  2. [Methodology for map simulation and power-spectrum calculation] Temperature maps are constructed solely from the linear matter power spectrum modified by the PMF compensated mode. On the small scales where PMF effects are strongest, non-linear gravitational evolution and astrophysical contributions (e.g., from galaxies and reionization) are expected to dominate; the absence of any robustness test against these effects undermines the quantitative S/N values and the extrapolation to SKA1-MID sensitivity.
minor comments (3)
  1. The exact frequency ranges and bandwidths adopted for the uGMRT Band 3 and MeerKAT L-band calculations should be stated explicitly, together with the corresponding redshift intervals.
  2. A brief comparison of the PMF-modified spectra to the pure adiabatic case (without PMF) would help readers assess the magnitude of the reported enhancement.
  3. The manuscript would benefit from a short discussion of how the chosen example values B_0 = 4 nG and n_B = -2.9/-2.5 relate to existing upper limits from other probes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and valuable comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our work. We agree that the analysis is performed within a simplified model and will revise the manuscript to more explicitly discuss these limitations while preserving the value of this first calculation of multifrequency angular power spectra including the compensated magnetic mode.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on S/N ratios for SKA1-MID] The signal-to-noise ratios presented for SKA1-MID (and the associated claim that constraints on B_0 and n_B appear promising) rest exclusively on system noise; the manuscript explicitly states that foregrounds have not been included. Because foregrounds dominate 21 cm observations and their subtraction is non-trivial, the reported detectability cannot be taken as evidence that the compensated magnetic mode remains distinguishable after realistic foreground removal.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript already states that foregrounds have not been taken into account and that the S/N ratios are computed using only system noise. We agree that this prevents any strong claim about distinguishability after realistic foreground removal. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly frames the reported S/N values as optimistic estimates valid only in the absence of foregrounds. We will also revise the conclusions to state that further work incorporating foreground modeling is required before assessing the actual constraining power on PMF parameters with SKA1-MID. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methodology for map simulation and power-spectrum calculation] Temperature maps are constructed solely from the linear matter power spectrum modified by the PMF compensated mode. On the small scales where PMF effects are strongest, non-linear gravitational evolution and astrophysical contributions (e.g., from galaxies and reionization) are expected to dominate; the absence of any robustness test against these effects undermines the quantitative S/N values and the extrapolation to SKA1-MID sensitivity.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the temperature maps are generated from the linear matter power spectrum, as described in the methods. This linear approximation was chosen to provide a first, controlled exploration of the effect of the compensated magnetic mode. We agree that non-linear gravitational evolution and astrophysical contributions will become important on the relevant small scales. In the revision we will insert a new paragraph discussing the limitations of the linear treatment, referencing existing literature on non-linear 21 cm modeling, and will qualify the quantitative S/N estimates as preliminary results that may be modified by more complete simulations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: forward calculation from established linear power-spectrum modifications.

full rationale

The paper takes the PMF-modified linear matter power spectrum as an input from prior literature, generates temperature maps from it, and computes multifrequency angular power spectra as a direct forward calculation. No parameter is fitted to the target spectra and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-definition equates the output to the input, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The central claim that these spectra offer a route to constrain B0 and nB therefore rests on independent modeling steps rather than reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the standard cosmological framework plus two example magnetic-field parameter choices and the assumption that linear power-spectrum modifications are sufficient.

free parameters (2)
  • B0
    Magnetic field strength fixed at 4 nG as an example value.
  • nB
    Spectral indices fixed at -2.9 and -2.5 as example values.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The compensated magnetic mode is the appropriate mode to add to the adiabatic curvature mode for primordial magnetic fields.
    Invoked when constructing the modified linear matter power spectrum.
  • ad hoc to paper Foregrounds can be ignored for this initial estimate of signal-to-noise.
    Explicitly stated as not taken into account.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5804 in / 1378 out tokens · 53167 ms · 2026-05-21T20:34:53.667945+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    to obtain the 21 cm brightness temperature maps. After modifying accordingly fg rm to cross correlate 21 cm signal maps at different frequencies the corresponding angular power spectra of the auto- and cro ss correlations have been calculated. The cross correlation angular power spectrum is also known a s multifrequency angular power spec- trum (MAPS) [28]...

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    0 |CM AP S ℓ (∆ ν)|[mK2] × 10− 8 MeerKAT L-band (1) νc=986 MHz (z=0.44) ad, ℓ=607 ad+CMM(4,-2.9), ℓ=607 ad+CMM(4,-2.5), ℓ=607 ℓ=831 ℓ=1578 ℓ=2257 ℓ=3498 10− 2 10− 1 100 ∆ ν [MHz] 0 5 10MM AP S ℓ (∆ ν) 0 1 2 3 4|CM AP S ℓ (∆ ν)|[mK2] × 10− 7 MeerKAT L-band (2) νc=1077.5 MHz (z=0.32) ad, ℓ=607 ad+CMM(4,-2.9), ℓ=607 ad+CMM(4,-2.5), ℓ=607 ℓ=831 ℓ=1578 ℓ=2257 ...

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    L. M. Widrow, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 775 (2002), astro-ph/0207240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Primordial magnetogenesis

    A. Kandus, K. E. Kunze, and C. G. Tsagas, Phys.Rept. 505, 1 (2011), 1007.3891

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013), 1303.7121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields

    K. Subramanian, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 076901 (2016), 1504.02311

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A19 (2016), 1502.01594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    K. E. Kunze, Phys. Rev. D83, 023006 (2011), 1007.3163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    J. R. Shaw and A. Lewis, Phys.Rev. D81, 043517 (2010), 0911.2714

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    The full contribution of a stochastic background of magnetic fields to CMB anisotropies

    D. Paoletti, F. Finelli, and F. Paci, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 396, 523 (2009), 0811.0230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Effects of Cosmological Magnetic Helicity on the Cosmic Microwave Background

    T. Kahniashvili and B. Ratra, Phys. Rev. D71, 103006 (2005), astro-ph/0503709

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Magnetized initial conditions for CMB anisotropies

    M. Giovannini, Phys. Rev. D 70, 123507 (2004), astro-ph/0409594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    E.-J. Kim, A. V. Olinto, and R. Rosner, Astrophys. J. 468, 28 (1996), astro-ph/9412070

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  14. [14]

    S. K. Sethi and K. Subramanian, Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 356, 778 (2005), astro-ph/0405413

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    K. E. Kunze and E. Komatsu, JCAP 1506, 027 (2015), 1501.00142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Paoletti, J

    D. Paoletti, J. Chluba, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubi˜ no-Mart ´ ın, Mon . Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 3916 (2022), 2204.06302

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    K. E. Kunze, JCAP 2023, 017 (2023), 2306.06049

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    K. E. Kunze, JCAP 11, 044 (2021), 2106.00648

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Blind foreground subtraction for intensity mapping experiments

    D. Alonso, P. Bull, P. G. Ferreira, and M. G. Santos, Mon. Not. R oy. Astron. Soc. 447, 400 (2015), 1409.8667

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Ananthakrishnan, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronom y Supplement 16, 427 (1995)

    S. Ananthakrishnan, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronom y Supplement 16, 427 (1995)

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Cosmology with a SKA HI intensity mapping survey

    M. Santos, P. Bull, D. Alonso, S. Camera, P. Ferreira, G. Berna rdi, R. Maartens, M. Viel, F. Villaescusa- Navarro, F. B. Abdalla, et al., in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AA SKA14) (2015), p. 19, 1501.03989

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Square Kilometre Array Cosmology Science Working Group, D. J. Bacon, R. A. Battye, P. Bull, S. Cam- era, P. G. Ferreira, I. Harrison, D. Parkinson, A. Pourtsidou, M. G. Santos, et al., Pub. Astronom. Soc. Australia 37, e007 (2020), 1811.02743

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    MeerKLASS: MeerKAT Large Area Synoptic Survey

    M. Santos, P. Bull, S. Camera, S. Chen, J. Fonseca, I. Heywoo d, M. Hilton, M. Jarvis, G. I. G. Jozsa, K. Knowles, et al., in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA (2016), p. 32, 1709.06099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues (2011), 1104.2932

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, JCAP 1107, 034 (2011), 1104.2933

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) III: Comparision with CAMB for LambdaCDM

    J. Lesgourgues (2011), 1104.2934. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: Efficient implementation of non-cold relics

    J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, JCAP 1109, 032 (2011), 1104.2935

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Fast and accurate CMB computations in non-flat FLRW universes

    J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, JCAP 1409, 032 (2014), 1312.2697

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Fast simulations for intensity mapping experiments

    D. Alonso, P. G. Ferreira, and M. G. Santos, Mon. Not. Roy. As tron. Soc. 444, 3183 (2014), 1405.1751

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    K. K. Datta, T. R. Choudhury, and S. Bharadwaj, Mon. Not. R oy. Astron. Soc. 378, 119 (2007), astro-ph/0605546

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    Gupta, B

    Y. Gupta, B. Ajithkumar, H. S. Kale, S. Nayak, S. Sabhapathy , S. Sureshkumar, R. V. Swami, J. N. Chengalur, S. K. Ghosh, C. H. Ishwara-Chandra, et al., Current S cience 113, 707 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], 1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J. J. Hern´ and ez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co, A. Masoni, M. Mikhasenko, R. E. Mitchell, C. Patrignani, et al., Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Magnetohydrodynamics in the Early Universe and the Damping of Non-linear Alfven Waves

    K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D58, 083502 (1998), astro-ph/9712083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  35. [35]

    Damping of Cosmic Magnetic Fields

    K. Jedamzik, V. Katalinic, and A. V. Olinto, Phys. Rev. D57, 3264 (1998), astro-ph/9606080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    K. E. Kunze, Phys.Rev. D85, 083004 (2012), 1112.4797

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    I. P. Carucci, M. O. Irfan, and J. Bobin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astro n. Soc. 499, 304 (2020), 2006.05996

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    S. Pal, K. M. A. Elahi, S. Bharadwaj, S. S. Ali, S. Choudhuri, A. Gh osh, A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, N. Roy, M. Choudhury, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516, 2851 (2022), 2208.11063

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    A method to determine the evolution history of the mean neutral Hydrogen fraction

    R. Mondal, S. Bharadwaj, I. T. Iliev, K. K. Datta, S. Majumdar , A. K. Shaw, and A. K. Sarkar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483, L109 (2019), 1810.06273

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    K. M. A. Elahi, S. Bharadwaj, S. Pal, A. Ghosh, S. S. Ali, S. Choud huri, A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, N. Roy, M. Choudhury, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 529, 3372 (2024), 2403.06736

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    K. M. A. Elahi, S. Bharadwaj, A. Ghosh, S. Pal, S. S. Ali, S. Choud huri, A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, N. Roy, M. Choudhury, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520, 2094 (2023), 2301.06677

    work page arXiv 2094

  42. [42]

    S. Paul, M. G. Santos, Z. Chen, and L. Wolz, arXiv e-prints arXiv :2301.11943 (2023), 2301.11943

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Dewdney, SKA1 System baseline v2 description 2015-11-04, www.skao.int (2015)

    P. Dewdney, SKA1 System baseline v2 description 2015-11-04, www.skao.int (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Redd y, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al., Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    A. K. Shaw, R. Ghara, S. Zaroubi, R. Mondal, G. Mellema, F. Mert ens, L. V. E. Koopmans, and B. Semelin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522, 2188 (2023), 2302.01127

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    M. A. Alvarez, E. Komatsu, O. Dore, and P. R. Shapiro, Astrop hys. J. 647, 840 (2006), astro- ph/0512010

    work page arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Reionization and the large-scale 21 cm-cosmic microwave background cross correlation

    P. Adshead and S. Furlanetto, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384, 291 (2008), 0706.3220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    21 Centimeter Fluctuations from Cosmic Gas at High Redshifts

    M. Zaldarriaga, S. R. Furlanetto, and L. Hernquist, Astrophy s. J. 608, 622 (2004), astro-ph/0311514

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [49]

    Q. Ma, K. Helgason, E. Komatsu, B. Ciardi, and A. Ferrara, Mon . Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476, 4025 (2018), 1712.05305. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Beyond the Damping Tail: Cross-Correlating the Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect with Cosmic Shear

    O. Dor´ e, J. F. Hennawi, and D. N. Spergel, Astrophys.J. 606, 46 (2004), astro-ph/0309337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    Mondal, A

    R. Mondal, A. K. Shaw, I. T. Iliev, S. Bharadwaj, K. K. Datta, S . Majumdar, A. K. Sarkar, and K. L. Dixon, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 494, 4043 (2020), 1910.05196

    work page arXiv 2020