pith. sign in

arxiv: 1409.8667 · v1 · pith:U2JUKWXJnew · submitted 2014-09-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Blind foreground subtraction for intensity mapping experiments

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords foregroundsubtractionblinddifferentanalysisapproachescomponentefficiency
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We make use of a large set of fast simulations of an intensity mapping experiment with characteristics similar to those expected of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) in order to study the viability and limits of blind foreground subtraction techniques. In particular, we consider different approaches: polynomial fitting, principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). We review the motivations and algorithms for the three methods, and show that they can all be described, using the same mathematical framework, as different approaches to the blind source separation problem. We study the efficiency of foreground subtraction both in the angular and radial (frequency) directions, as well as the dependence of this efficiency on different instrumental and modelling parameters. For well-behaved foregrounds and instrumental effects we find that foreground subtraction can be successful to a reasonable level on most scales of interest. We also quantify the effect that the cleaning has on the recovered signal and power spectra. Interestingly, we find that the three methods yield quantitatively similar results, with PCA and ICA being almost equivalent.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effects of primordial magnetic fields on 21 cm multifrequency angular power spectra

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper calculates multifrequency angular power spectra of the 21 cm line for models with primordial magnetic fields of strength 4 nG and spectral indices -2.9 and -2.5, then estimates signal-to-noise ratios for uGM...

  2. Mitigating gain calibration errors from EoR observations with SKA1-Low AA*

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations show hybrid foreground mitigation (GPR + PCA combined with avoidance) recovers the HI 21cm signal within 2σ for gain calibration errors ≤1% in SKA1-Low AA* observations over 0.05-0.5 Mpc^{-1} scales.