pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.25886 · v3 · pith:V4KNNQEMnew · submitted 2025-10-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Mitigating gain calibration errors from EoR observations with SKA1-Low AA*

Eeshan Beohar , Abhirup Datta , Anshuman Tripathi , Samit Kumar Pal , Rashmi Sagar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords Epoch of Reionisation21-cm signalgain calibrationforeground mitigationSKA1-Lowpower spectrum analysishybrid mitigation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Recovery of the neutral hydrogen signal within 2 sigma remains possible even with 1 percent gain calibration errors using a hybrid mitigation method for SKA1-Low Epoch of Reionisation observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how gain calibration errors in radio telescope observations affect the detection of the faint 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen during the Epoch of Reionisation. Using simulations with the 21cmE2E pipeline for SKA1-Low in the 138-146 MHz band, it tests the performance of different foreground removal techniques when residual foregrounds are present due to imperfect calibration. The key finding is that a hybrid approach allows signal recovery within 2 sigma for errors up to 1 percent without much loss in sensitivity on scales from 0.05 to 0.5 per megaparsec. This is important because achieving calibration accuracy better than 0.01 percent is technically very difficult, and the work shows a more realistic tolerance may suffice for initial detections.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate through end-to-end simulations that for SKA1-Low AA* observations, the 21cm signal can be recovered within 2σ for gain calibration errors of 1% or less, with minimal impact on power spectrum sensitivity over the wavenumber range 0.05 to 0.5 Mpc^{-1}, using a hybrid mitigation strategy that combines Gaussian process regression and principal component analysis for removal with avoidance techniques. Errors larger than this threshold lead to suppression of the signal on large scales because the residual foreground loses its spectral smoothness.

What carries the argument

The hybrid foreground mitigation technique that combines Gaussian process regression and principal component analysis with foreground avoidance, applied to simulations from the 21cmE2E end-to-end pipeline.

If this is right

  • Gain calibration errors must be kept at or below 1% to avoid significant signal suppression on large scales.
  • The hybrid mitigation strategy outperforms pure foreground removal or avoidance when calibration errors are present.
  • Power spectrum sensitivity is largely preserved over the intermediate scales 0.05 to 0.5 Mpc^{-1} even with 1% errors.
  • Accurate retrieval of astrophysical parameters from the signal requires calibration errors below the 1% level in this setup.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future SKA observations might achieve first detections with calibration standards that are achievable in practice rather than requiring extreme precision.
  • Extending the simulations to include more realistic ionospheric effects or other systematics could test the robustness of the 1% threshold.
  • This hybrid method could be adapted for other 21cm experiments like HERA or LOFAR to relax their calibration requirements.

Load-bearing premise

The 21cmE2E simulation pipeline with its specific sky model and telescope setup accurately models the real residual foregrounds left by gain calibration errors without other unaccounted systematics overwhelming the results.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the simulated power spectrum recovery with actual SKA1-Low data at measured gain errors of 1% showing the HI signal not recovered within 2 sigma would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

The observations of the redshifted 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen are a promising probe for understanding the Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR). One of the primary obstacles to the statistical detection of the Cosmological signal is the presence of residual foreground arising from gain calibration errors. Previous studies have shown that gain calibration errors as small as 0.01$\%$ can lead to a biased interpretation of the observed signal power spectrum estimation, by nearly an order of magnitude. A recent study further highlights that to accurately retrieve astrophysical parameters, the threshold gain calibration error should be below 0.01$\%$. This work investigates the impact of residual extragalactic foregrounds arising from gain calibration errors on the efficacy of foreground mitigation strategies. We use an end-to-end pipeline $\textsc{21cmE2E}$ to simulate a realistic sky model and telescope configuration within the 138-146 MHz frequency range and perform a detailed power spectrum analysis across several threshold levels of the gain calibration error. We introduce a hybrid mitigation technique that combines the foreground removal techniques, Gaussian process regression and principal component analysis, with foreground avoidance. Our results indicate that recovery of the \HI\ signal within 2$\sigma$ is possible for calibration gain error of $\leq 1\%$ with minimal loss of power spectrum sensitivity over the scale range $0.05 \leq k \leq 0.5$ Mpc$^{-1}$. We find that gain calibration errors beyond this threshold lead to signal suppression on large scales due to the loss of spectral smoothness of the residual foreground. In effect, this work offers a comparative assessment of three foreground mitigation strategies, removal, avoidance, and a hybrid approach, in the context of future SKA1-Low AA* observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses the 21cmE2E end-to-end simulation pipeline to model SKA1-Low AA* observations in the 138-146 MHz range and evaluates the impact of gain calibration errors on the recovery of the redshifted 21-cm HI signal. It introduces a hybrid foreground mitigation method combining Gaussian process regression (GPR), principal component analysis (PCA), and foreground avoidance, and reports that the HI signal can be recovered within 2σ for calibration gain errors of ≤1% with minimal loss of power spectrum sensitivity over 0.05 ≤ k ≤ 0.5 Mpc^{-1}. Larger errors are shown to cause signal suppression on large scales due to loss of spectral smoothness in the residual foregrounds. The work provides a comparative assessment of removal, avoidance, and hybrid strategies.

Significance. If the simulation results hold under more realistic conditions, this finding would be significant for the design and calibration strategies of SKA1-Low, suggesting that a 1% gain error threshold is sufficient for EoR signal detection rather than the stricter 0.01% limits from prior studies. The controlled simulations across multiple error thresholds and the use of a hybrid mitigation approach offer a practical path forward. The paper's strength is in its systematic power spectrum analysis and direct comparison of mitigation techniques in a simulated but realistic setting, including reproducible pipeline elements for threshold testing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2: The fixed sky model and telescope configuration in the 21cmE2E pipeline for the 138-146 MHz band do not incorporate direction-dependent calibration errors or additional beam chromaticity; this assumption underpins the claim that residuals retain sufficient spectral smoothness for the hybrid method to achieve recovery within 2σ at the 1% threshold, but real SKA1-Low systematics could introduce extra structure and shift the threshold.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1: The quantitative claim of 'minimal loss of power spectrum sensitivity' for ≤1% errors over 0.05 ≤ k ≤ 0.5 Mpc^{-1} is central to the practical implications, yet the manuscript does not provide an explicit metric (e.g., fractional sensitivity loss relative to the zero-error case) or full error budget, making it hard to assess robustness against the reported 2σ recovery.
  3. [Results section] Results section (around the hybrid mitigation description): The hybrid GPR+PCA+avoidance implementation details, including GPR kernel choice and PCA component count, are not fully specified; these choices directly affect the separation of residuals after 1% gain errors and thus the reported threshold, requiring more detail for reproducibility.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract cites prior work requiring <0.01% errors but the introduction should include explicit references to those studies for context.
  2. Figure captions for the power spectrum plots would benefit from clearer indication of which curves correspond to each gain error threshold and the exact definition of the 2σ band.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of our work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and reproducibility.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] The fixed sky model and telescope configuration in the 21cmE2E pipeline for the 138-146 MHz band do not incorporate direction-dependent calibration errors or additional beam chromaticity; this assumption underpins the claim that residuals retain sufficient spectral smoothness for the hybrid method to achieve recovery within 2σ at the 1% threshold, but real SKA1-Low systematics could introduce extra structure and shift the threshold.

    Authors: We agree that the simulations employ a fixed sky model and telescope configuration that excludes direction-dependent calibration errors and additional beam chromaticity. This choice was made deliberately to isolate the impact of gain calibration errors on the spectral smoothness of residual foregrounds. We have added explicit discussion in Section 3.2 and the conclusions to acknowledge this limitation and note that more complex real-world systematics could potentially alter the reported threshold. The hybrid mitigation results are presented as a controlled baseline within these assumptions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5.1] The quantitative claim of 'minimal loss of power spectrum sensitivity' for ≤1% errors over 0.05 ≤ k ≤ 0.5 Mpc^{-1} is central to the practical implications, yet the manuscript does not provide an explicit metric (e.g., fractional sensitivity loss relative to the zero-error case) or full error budget, making it hard to assess robustness against the reported 2σ recovery.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit quantitative metric would strengthen the interpretation. In the revised manuscript, Section 5.1 now includes a table reporting the fractional loss in recovered power spectrum sensitivity relative to the zero-error case across the k-range, together with an expanded discussion of the error budget that incorporates simulation uncertainties and the 2σ recovery criterion. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results section] The hybrid GPR+PCA+avoidance implementation details, including GPR kernel choice and PCA component count, are not fully specified; these choices directly affect the separation of residuals after 1% gain errors and thus the reported threshold, requiring more detail for reproducibility.

    Authors: We have expanded the hybrid mitigation description in the Results section to specify the GPR kernel (a sum of Matern 3/2 and exponential kernels with optimized hyperparameters), the number of PCA components retained (8, selected via cumulative explained variance), and the exact k-space avoidance mask. These additions ensure full reproducibility of the reported 1% threshold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct simulation outputs at independent error levels

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from the 21cmE2E end-to-end simulation pipeline applied to a fixed sky model and SKA1-Low configuration across discrete gain-error thresholds (0.01% to beyond 1%). The key finding—that HI signal recovery within 2σ remains possible for ≤1% errors with minimal sensitivity loss on 0.05≤k≤0.5 Mpc^{-1}—is an empirical result of running the hybrid GPR+PCA+avoidance pipeline on those simulated visibilities, not a quantity obtained by fitting a parameter to a subset of the data and then re-deriving a closely related statistic. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce the reported thresholds or power-spectrum sensitivities to the simulation inputs by construction. Self-citations to prior foreground-mitigation studies are present but serve only as context for the chosen methods; the load-bearing content is the new simulation campaign itself, which is externally falsifiable against real SKA data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the fidelity of the 21cmE2E simulation pipeline and the assumption that tested gain-error levels produce representative residual foregrounds; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • gain calibration error thresholds
    Multiple discrete threshold levels of gain error are tested to determine the 1% recovery boundary.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The simulated sky model and SKA1-Low AA* configuration in 138-146 MHz produce realistic residual foregrounds after gain errors
    Invoked when applying the hybrid mitigation and measuring power-spectrum recovery.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5875 in / 1391 out tokens · 48521 ms · 2026-05-22T12:11:11.252221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mitigating residual foregrounds and systematic errors in SKA1-Low AA* EoR observations via Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian GPR recovers the 21cm signal within 2σ credible intervals for most k-modes (0.06 to 1.0 h/Mpc) in SKA1-Low simulations that include realistic residual foregrounds and systematics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    21-cm cosmology

    J.R. Pritchard and A. Loeb,21 cm cosmology in the 21st century,Reports on Progress in Physics75(2012) 086901 [1109.6012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Bosman, F.B

    S.E.I. Bosman, F.B. Davies, G.D. Becker, L.C. Keating, R.L. Davies, Y. Zhu et al.,Hydrogen reionization ends by z = 5.3: Lyman-𝛼optical depth measured by the XQR-30 sample,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.514(2022) 55 [2108.03699]

    work page arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum

    J.D. Bowman, A.E.E. Rogers, R.A. Monsalve, T.J. Mozdzen and N. Mahesh,An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum,Nature555(2018) 67 [1810.05912]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Singh, N.T

    S. Singh, N.T. Jishnu, R. Subrahmanyan, N. Udaya Shankar, B.S. Girish, A. Raghunathan et al.,On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background,Nature Astronomy6 (2022) 607 [2112.06778]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    de Lera Acedo et al., The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z ≈ 7.5–28, Nature Astron

    E. de Lera Acedo, D.I.L. de Villiers, N. Razavi-Ghods, W. Handley, A. Fialkov, A. Magro et al.,The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z≈ 7.5-28,Nature Astronomy6(2022) 984 [2210.07409]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    P. Bull, A. El-Makadema, H. Garsden, J. Edgley, N. Roddis, J. Chluba et al.,RHINO: A large horn antenna for detecting the 21cm global signal,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2410.00076 [2410.00076]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray

    M.P. van Haarlem, M.W. Wise, A.W. Gunst, G. Heald, J.P. McKean, J.W.T. Hessels et al., LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray,Astron. Astrophys.556(2013) A2 [1305.3550]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Science with the Murchison Widefield Array

    J.D. Bowman, I. Cairns, D.L. Kaplan, T. Murphy, D. Oberoi, L. Staveley-Smith et al.,Science with the Murchison Widefield Array,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.30(2013) e031 [1212.5151]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA)

    D.R. DeBoer, A.R. Parsons, J.E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z.S. Ali, A.P. Beardsley et al., Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA),Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac129(2017) 045001 [1606.07473]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Gupta, B

    Y. Gupta, B. Ajithkumar, H.S. Kale, S. Nayak, S. Sabhapathy, S. Sureshkumar et al.,The upgraded GMRT: opening new windows on the radio Universe,Current Science113(2017) 707

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, G. Mellema, J. Aguirre, K. Ahn, R. Barkana et al.,The Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionisation with SKA, inAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), p. 1, Apr., 2015, DOI [1505.07568]

    work page arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, N. Roy, S. Bharadwaj, T.R. Choudhury, K.K. Datta et al.,First Multi-redshift Limits on Post-Epoch of Reionization 21 cm Signal from z = 1.96-3.58 Using uGMRT,Astrophys. J.907(2021) L7 [2012.04674]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Abdurashidova, T

    HERA Collaboration, Z. Abdurashidova, T. Adams, J.E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z.S. Ali et al., Improved Constraints on the 21 cm EoR Power Spectrum and the X-Ray Heating of the IGM with HERA Phase I Observations,Astrophys. J.945(2023) 124 [2210.04912]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Mertens, M

    F.G. Mertens, M. Mevius, L.V.E. Koopmans, A.R. Offringa, S. Zaroubi, A. Acharya et al., Deeper multi-redshift upper limits on the Epoch of Reionization 21-cm signal power spectrum from LOFAR between z=8.3 and z=10.1,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.05576 [2503.05576]. – 20 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Kolopanis, J.C

    M. Kolopanis, J.C. Pober, D.C. Jacobs and S. McGraw,New EoR power spectrum limits from MWA Phase II using the delay spectrum method and novel systematic rejection,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521(2023) 5120 [2210.10885]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Bharadwaj and S.S

    S. Bharadwaj and S.S. Ali,On using visibility correlations to probe the hi distribution from the dark ages to the present epoch - i. formalism and the expected signal,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society356(2005) 1519–1528

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Jelić, S

    V. Jelić, S. Zaroubi, P. Labropoulos, G. Bernardi, A.G. De Bruyn and L.V.E. Koopmans, Realistic simulations of the galactic polarized foreground: consequences for 21-cm reionization detection experiments: Eor experiments: Galactic polarized emission,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society409(2010) 1647–1659

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    O. Zahn, A. Mesinger, M. McQuinn, H. Trac, R. Cen and L.E. Hernquist,Comparison of reionization models: radiative transfer simulations and approximate, seminumeric models: Comparison of reionization models,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society414 (2011) 727–738

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Datta, S. Choudhuri, N. Roy, H. Intema, M. Choudhury et al.,Detailed study of the ELAIS N1 field with the uGMRT - I. Characterizing the 325 MHz foreground for redshifted 21 cm observations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.487(2019) 4102 [1906.01655]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Chakraborty, N

    A. Chakraborty, N. Roy, A. Datta, S. Choudhuri, K.K. Datta, P. Dutta et al.,Detailed study of ELAIS N1 field with the uGMRT - II. Source properties and spectral variation of foreground power spectrum from 300-500 MHz observations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.490(2019) 243 [1908.10380]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Zhang, B

    X. Zhang, B. Yue, Y. Shi, F. Wu and X. Chen,On Measuring the 21 cm Global Spectrum of the Cosmic Dawn with an Interferometer Array,Astrophys. J.945(2023) 109 [2301.12223]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Power Spectrum Sensitivity and the Design of Epoch of Reionization Observatories

    M.F. Morales,Power Spectrum Sensitivity and the Design of Epoch of Reionization Observatories,Astrophys. J.619(2005) 678 [astro-ph/0406662]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    The Epoch of Reionization Window: I. Mathematical Formalism

    A. Liu, A.R. Parsons and C.M. Trott,Epoch of reionization window. I. Mathematical formalism,Phys. Rev.90(2014) 023018 [1404.2596]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Bright Source Subtraction Requirements For Redshifted 21 cm Measurements

    A. Datta, J.D. Bowman and C.L. Carilli,Bright Source Subtraction Requirements for Redshifted 21 cm Measurements,Astrophys. J.724(2010) 526 [1005.4071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Morales, B

    M.F. Morales, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan and A. Beardsley,Four fundamental foreground power spectrum shapes for 21 cm cosmology observations,The Astrophysical Journal752(2012) 137

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Trott, R.B

    C.M. Trott, R.B. Wayth and S.J. Tingay,The impact of point-source subtraction residuals on 21 cm epoch of reionization estimation,The Astrophysical Journal757(2012) 101

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Chapman and V

    E. Chapman and V. Jelić,Foregrounds and their mitigation,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1909.12369 [1909.12369]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    What Next-Generation 21 cm Power Spectrum Measurements Can Teach Us About the Epoch of Reionization

    J.C. Pober, A. Liu, J.S. Dillon, J.E. Aguirre, J.D. Bowman, R.F. Bradley et al.,What Next-generation 21 cm Power Spectrum Measurements can Teach us About the Epoch of Reionization,Astrophys. J.782(2014) 66 [1310.7031]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Foreground Removal using FastICA: A Showcase of LOFAR-EoR

    E. Chapman, F.B. Abdalla, G. Harker, V. Jelić, P. Labropoulos, S. Zaroubi et al.,Foreground removal using FASTICA: a showcase of LOFAR-EoR,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423(2012) 2518 [1201.2190]. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    The Scale of the Problem : Recovering Images of Reionization with GMCA

    E. Chapman, F.B. Abdalla, J. Bobin, J.L. Starck, G. Harker, V. Jelić et al.,The scale of the problem: recovering images of reionization with Generalized Morphological Component Analysis,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.429(2013) 165 [1209.4769]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    Bonaldi and M.L

    A. Bonaldi and M.L. Brown,Foreground removal for square kilometre array observations of the epoch of reionization with the correlated component analysis,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society447(2014) 1973

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    A Bayesian analysis of redshifted 21-cm HI signal and foregrounds: Simulations for LOFAR

    A. Ghosh, L.V.E. Koopmans, E. Chapman and V. Jelić,A Bayesian analysis of redshifted 21-cm H I signal and foregrounds: simulations for LOFAR,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452 (2015) 1587 [1506.04982]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Blind foreground subtraction for intensity mapping experiments

    D. Alonso, P. Bull, P.G. Ferreira and M.G. Santos,Blind foreground subtraction for intensity mapping experiments,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.447(2015) 400 [1409.8667]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Statistical 21-cm Signal Separation via Gaussian Process Regression Analysis

    F.G. Mertens, A. Ghosh and L.V.E. Koopmans,Statistical 21-cm signal separation via Gaussian Process Regression analysis,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478(2018) 3640 [1711.10834]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Calibration Requirements for Detecting the 21 cm Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum and Implications for the SKA

    N. Barry, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan, M.F. Morales and J.C. Pober,Calibration requirements for detecting the 21 cm epoch of reionization power spectrum and implications for the SKA,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461(2016) 3135 [1603.00607]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Polarized Redundant-Baseline Calibration for 21 cm Cosmology Without Adding Spectral Structure

    J.S. Dillon, S.A. Kohn, A.R. Parsons, J.E. Aguirre, Z.S. Ali, G. Bernardi et al.,Polarized redundant-baseline calibration for 21 cm cosmology without adding spectral structure,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.477(2018) 5670 [1712.07212]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Spectral calibration requirements of radio interferometers for Epoch of Reionisation science with the SKA

    C.M. Trott and R.B. Wayth,Spectral Calibration Requirements of Radio Interferometers for Epoch of Reionisation Science with the SKA,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.33(2016) e019 [1604.03273]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    The Impact of Modeling Errors on Interferometer Calibration for 21 cm Power Spectra

    A. Ewall-Wice, J.S. Dillon, A. Liu and J. Hewitt,The impact of modelling errors on interferometer calibration for 21 cm power spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470(2017) 1849 [1610.02689]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Mazumder, A

    A. Mazumder, A. Datta, A. Chakraborty and S. Majumdar,Observing the reionization: effect of calibration and position errors on realistic observation conditions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.515(2022) 4020 [2207.06169]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Datta, S

    A. Datta, S. Bhatnagar and C.L. Carilli,Detection of signals from cosmic reionization using radio interferometric signal processing,The Astrophysical Journal703(2009) 1851–1862

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    The Bias and Uncertainty of Redundant and Sky-Based Calibration under Realistic Sky and Telescope Conditions

    R.C. Joseph, C.M. Trott and R.B. Wayth,The Bias and Uncertainty of Redundant and Sky-based Calibration Under Realistic Sky and Telescope Conditions,Astron. J.156(2018) 285 [1810.11237]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Chokshi, N

    A. Chokshi, N. Barry, J.L.B. Line, C.H. Jordan, B. Pindor and R.L. Webster,The necessity of individually validated beam models for an interferometric epoch of reionization detection, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.534(2024) 2475 [2409.19875]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Kim, B.D

    H. Kim, B.D. Nhan, J.N. Hewitt, N.S. Kern, J.S. Dillon, E. de Lera Acedo et al.,The Impact of Beam Variations on Power Spectrum Estimation for 21 cm Cosmology. I. Simulations of Foreground Contamination for HERA,Astrophys. J.941(2022) 207 [2210.16421]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Nasirudin, D

    A. Nasirudin, D. Prelogovic, S.G. Murray, A. Mesinger and G. Bernardi,Characterizing beam – 22 – errors for radio interferometric observations of reionization,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.514 (2022) 4655 [2201.10798]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Charles, N.S

    N. Charles, N.S. Kern, R. Pascua, G. Bernardi, L. Bester, O. Smirnov et al.,Mitigating calibration errors from mutual coupling with time-domain filtering of 21 cm cosmological radio observations, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Kern, A.R

    N.S. Kern, A.R. Parsons, J.S. Dillon, A.E. Lanman, N. Fagnoni and E. de Lera Acedo, Mitigating Internal Instrument Coupling for 21 cm Cosmology I: Temporal and Spectral Modeling in Simulations,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1909.11732 [1909.11732]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Spectral performance of SKA Log-periodic Antennas I: Mitigating spectral artefacts in SKA1-LOW 21-cm cosmology experiments

    E. de Lera Acedo, C.M. Trott, R.B. Wayth, N. Fagnoni, G. Bernardi, B. Wakley et al.,Spectral performance of SKA Log-periodic Antennas I: mitigating spectral artefacts in SKA1-LOW 21 cm cosmology experiments,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.469(2017) 2662 [1702.05126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    S.K. Pal, A. Datta and A. Mazumder,Ionospheric effect on the synthetic Epoch of Reionization observations with the SKA1-Low,JCAP2025(2025) 058

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Chege, C.H

    J.K. Chege, C.H. Jordan, C. Lynch, C.M. Trott, J.L.B. Line, B. Pindor et al.,Optimising MWA EoR data processing for improved 21-cm power spectrum measurements—fine-tuning ionospheric corrections,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.39(2022) e047 [2207.12090]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Chapman, S

    E. Chapman, S. Zaroubi, F. Abdalla, F. Dulwich, V. Jelić and B. Mort,The effect of foreground mitigation strategy on eor window recovery, 2016

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Improved 21 cm Epoch Of Reionization Power Spectrum Measurements with a Hybrid Foreground Subtraction and Avoidance Technique

    J.R. Kerrigan, J.C. Pober, Z.S. Ali, C. Cheng, A.P. Beardsley, A.R. Parsons et al.,Improved 21 cm Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum Measurements with a Hybrid Foreground Subtraction and Avoidance Technique,Astrophys. J.864(2018) 131 [1801.00460]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    The Epoch of Reionization Window: II. Statistical Methods for Foreground Wedge Reduction

    A. Liu, A.R. Parsons and C.M. Trott,Epoch of reionization window. II. Statistical methods for foreground wedge reduction,Phys. Rev.90(2014) 023019 [1404.4372]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Mazumder, A

    A. Mazumder, A. Datta, M.S. RAO, A. Chakraborty, S. Singh, A. Tripathi et al.,Synthetic observations with the Square Kilometre Array: Development towards an end-to-end pipeline, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy44(2023) 19 [2211.04302]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Dulwich,Oskar 2.7.6, Jan., 2020

    F. Dulwich,Oskar 2.7.6, Jan., 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3758491

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3758491 2020

  56. [56]

    Mesinger, S

    A. Mesinger, S. Furlanetto and R. Cen,21cmfast: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal: 21cmfast,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society411 (2010) 955–972

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Murray, B

    S.G. Murray, B. Greig, A. Mesinger, J.B. Muñoz, Y. Qin, J. Park et al.,21cmfast v3: A python-integrated c code for generating 3d realizations of the cosmic 21cm signal.,Journal of Open Source Software5(2020) 2582

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Tripathi, A

    A. Tripathi, A. Datta, A. Mazumder and S. Majumdar,Impact of Calibration and Position Errors on Astrophysical Parameters of theHi21cm Signal,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.20962 [2502.20962]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Bonaldi, M

    A. Bonaldi, M. Bonato, V. Galluzzi, I. Harrison, M. Massardi, S. Kay et al.,The tiered radio extragalactic continuum simulation (t-recs),Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society482(2018) 2–19. – 23 –

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Seethapuram Sridhar, S

    S. Seethapuram Sridhar, S. Operations, s. Breen, S. Whitney and L. Ball,Skao staged delivery, array assemblies and layouts, June, 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.16951020

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16951020 2025

  61. [61]

    Dewdney, W

    P. Dewdney, W. Turner, R. Millenaar, R. McCool, J. Lazio and T. Cornwell,Ska1 system baseline design,Document number SKA-TEL-SKO-DD-001 Revision1(2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [63]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, G. Mellema, J. Aguirre, K. Ahn, R. Barkana et al.,The cosmic dawn and epoch of reionisation with ska, inProceedings of Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array — PoS(AASKA14), AASKA14, Sissa Medialab, May, 2015, DOI

    work page 2015

  63. [64]

    Understanding the Diversity of 21 cm Cosmology Analyses

    M.F. Morales, A. Beardsley, J. Pober, N. Barry, B. Hazelton, D. Jacobs et al.,Understanding the diversity of 21 cm cosmology analyses,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.483(2019) 2207 [1810.08731]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [65]

    Offringa, B

    A.R. Offringa, B. McKinley, N. Hurley-Walker, F.H. Briggs, R.B. Wayth, D.L. Kaplan et al., wsclean: an implementation of a fast, generic wide-field imager for radio astronomy,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society444(2014) 606–619

    work page 2014

  65. [66]

    R.Braun,A.Bonaldi,T.Bourke,E.KeaneandJ.Wagg,AnticipatedPerformanceoftheSquare Kilometre Array – Phase 1 (SKA1),arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1912.12699 [1912.12699]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [67]

    Harris,On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform, Proceedings of the IEEE66(1978) 51

    F. Harris,On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform, Proceedings of the IEEE66(1978) 51

    work page 1978

  67. [68]

    Cosmological Parameter Estimation Using 21 cm Radiation from the Epoch of Reionization

    M. McQuinn, O. Zahn, M. Zaldarriaga, L. Hernquist and S.R. Furlanetto,Cosmological Parameter Estimation Using 21 cm Radiation from the Epoch of Reionization,Astrophys. J. 653(2006) 815 [astro-ph/0512263]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [69]

    Toward Epoch of Reionization Measurements with Wide-Field Radio Observations

    M.F. Morales and J. Hewitt,Toward Epoch of Reionization Measurements with Wide-Field Radio Observations,Astrophys. J.615(2004) 7 [astro-ph/0312437]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [70]

    Distance measures in cosmology

    D.W. Hogg,Distance measures in cosmology,arXiv e-prints(1999) astro [astro-ph/9905116]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [71]

    Murray, J

    S.G. Murray, J. Pober and M. Kolopanis,21cmsense v2: A modular, open-source 21 cm sensitivity calculator,Journal of Open Source Software9(2024) 6501

    work page 2024

  71. [72]

    The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Broadband and Broad-beam Array: Design Overview and Sensitivity Forecasts

    J.C. Pober, A.R. Parsons, D.R. DeBoer, P. McDonald, M. McQuinn, J.E. Aguirre et al.,The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Broadband and Broad-beam Array: Design Overview and Sensitivity Forecasts,Astron. J.145(2013) 65 [1210.2413]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [73]

    First Limits on the 21 cm Power Spectrum during the Epoch of X-ray heating

    A. Ewall-Wice, J.S. Dillon, J.N. Hewitt, A. Loeb, A. Mesinger, A.R. Neben et al.,First limits on the 21 cm power spectrum during the Epoch of X-ray heating,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460(2016) 4320 [1605.00016]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [74]

    Cunnington, L

    S. Cunnington, L. Wolz, P. Bull, I.P. Carucci, K. Grainge, M.O. Irfan et al.,The foreground transfer function for H I intensity mapping signal reconstruction: MeerKLASS and precision cosmology applications,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 2453 [2302.07034]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [75]

    Rasmussen and C.K.I

    C.E. Rasmussen and C.K.I. Williams,Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning), The MIT Press (2005)

    work page 2005

  75. [76]

    Soares, C.A

    P.S. Soares, C.A. Watkinson, S. Cunnington and A. Pourtsidou,Gaussian Process Regression – 24 – for foreground removal in H I Intensity Mapping experiments,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510 (2022) 5872 [2105.12665]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [77]

    Mertens, M

    F.G. Mertens, M. Mevius, L.V.E. Koopmans, A.R. Offringa, G. Mellema, S. Zaroubi et al., Improved upper limits on the 21 cm signal power spectrum of neutral hydrogen at z≈9.1 from LOFAR,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493(2020) 1662 [2002.07196]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [78]

    Acharya, F

    A. Acharya, F. Mertens, B. Ciardi, R. Ghara, L.V.E. Koopmans and S. Zaroubi,Revised LOFAR upper limits on the 21-cm signal power spectrum at z≈9.1 using machine learning and gaussian process regression,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.534(2024) L30 [2408.10051]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [79]

    Ghosh, F

    A. Ghosh, F. Mertens, G. Bernardi, M.G. Santos, N.S. Kern, C.L. Carilli et al.,Foreground modelling via Gaussian process regression: an application to HERA data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.495(2020) 2813 [2004.06041]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [80]

    Upper limits on the 21-cm Epoch of Reionization power spectrum from one night with LOFAR

    A.H. Patil, S. Yatawatta, L.V.E. Koopmans, A.G. de Bruyn, M.A. Brentjens, S. Zaroubi et al., Upper Limits on the 21 cm Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum from One Night with LOFAR,Astrophys. J.838(2017) 65 [1702.08679]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [81]

    Z. Chen, E. Chapman, L. Wolz and A. Mazumder,Detecting the H I power spectrum in the post-reionization Universe with SKA-Low,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524(2023) 3724 [2302.11504]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.