Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 70 references

Electron Localization in Non-Compact Covalent Bonds Captured by the r2SCAN+V Approach

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that r2SCAN's failures on graphene, Fe, Cr2, and VO2 share one cause—missing bond-centered electron localization—and a one-parameter inter-site +V correction fixes all four.

desk verdict A plausible unifying story for four r2SCAN failures, but the mechanistic evidence is circular—send it to referees, not to press. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.16348 v1 pith:S6FN5Y4L submitted 2025-10-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Yubo Zhang , Da Ke , Rohan Maniar , Timo Lebeda , Peihong Zhang , Jianwei Sun , John P. Perdew This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph
keywords densityfunctionaltheoryr2SCANnon-compactcovalentbondselectronlocalizationinter-site+Vcorrectionself-interactionerrortransition-metalmagnetismstronglycorrelatedmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to explain why the advanced density functional r2SCAN, which is usually more accurate than the older PBE functional, fails on four specific materials while PBE succeeds. It argues that these failures share a single cause: non-compact covalent bonds formed by s-s, p-p, or d-d hybridization, where electrons should sit between nuclei rather than on atoms. r2SCAN improves electron localization at atomic sites but not in these bond centers; PBE accidentally balances both local and bond-region errors. The proposed fix, r2SCAN+V, adds a small inter-site potential that pushes electrons back to bond centers, improving all four cases with one fitted parameter each. If true, this identifies a missing ingredient in meta-GGA functional design.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inter-site corrective potential V, the off-site counterpart of the on-site U correction. In DFT it acts as a one-parameter penalty that discourages electrons from occupying nearest-neighbor orbitals simultaneously, which effectively accumulates electron density at bond centers. The paper pairs this +V term with r2SCAN's already-improved on-site localization, so the functional errors are corrected in both regions. The electron redistribution Δn = n_r2SCAN+V − n_r2SCAN is used as evidence that V moves electrons from atomic sites to non-compact bond centers.

What would settle it

A calculation that runs r2SCAN+V on Cr2 with a single fixed Vsd applied at all bond lengths (no geometry-dependent switch) and checks whether the shelf structure and short-bond region are simultaneously reproduced; if they are not, the one-parameter inter-site potential mechanism fails. Alternatively, a first-principles estimate of the inter-site interaction strength from linear response that disagrees strongly with the fitted V values (0.5–4 eV) would undermine the causal claim that the correction corresponds to a physical inter-site Coulomb interaction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that graphene's spurious bandgap, iron's overestimated magnetic moment, the chromium dimer's potential energy curve, and vanadium dioxide's dimer bond length all trace back to one shared deficiency: r2SCAN localizes electrons around nuclei better than PBE, but it does not equally improve localization of electrons in non-compact covalent bonds—stretched or weak bonds where electron density accumulates between atoms. Adding a small positive inter-site potential V, which penalizes simultaneous occupation of neighboring orbitals and thereby drives electrons toward bond centers, restores agreement with experiment in all tested materials. PBE works in these cases only

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that r2SCAN's dominant error in these materials is a shortage of bond-centered electron localization, so pushing electrons to bond centers with a fitted inter-site potential is the appropriate corrective; if the error is actually dominated by on-site or other effects in any of the four cases, the specific +V fix would not transfer and the fitting would be partly circular.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, PBE's good results on these materials are a coincidence of two opposing errors, not a sign that PBE is reliable; improving only on-site localization can make predictions worse.
  • A single inter-site parameter can replace the more cumbersome two-parameter on-site+intersite correction for these cases, and the required V values are small (0.5–0.8 eV) except in iron (4 eV).
  • Future meta-GGA functionals, especially those including Laplacian-level ingredients, need to treat bond-centered electron localization explicitly to avoid these systematic failures.
  • The same +V correction reduces the overestimated magnetic moment of chromium and iron, suggesting a route to fixing over-magnetization in transition-metal magnets.
  • The paper's mechanism implies that self-interaction corrections localized on bond orbitals, not just atomic orbitals, should improve r2SCAN without material-dependent fitted parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The one-parameter claim is fragile: for Cr2, the paper applies Vsd only on the shelf structure beyond 2.4 Å, a geometry-dependent on/off switch that introduces a second parameter and an untested boundary; a fully faithful one-parameter model would apply the same V at all bond lengths.
  • The fitted V values span 0.5 eV to 4 eV across similar d-d systems, which suggests 'non-compact covalent bonding' may be a family of errors whose magnitude depends on screening; an ab initio calculation of inter-site interactions (linear response or constrained DFT) could test whether these values are physically meaningful.
  • Because the paper claims the energy improvement is largely due to functional nonlocality rather than the density change, a natural extension is to test r2SCAN+V against a fully nonlocal self-interaction correction localized on bond orbitals—if that also fixes the same four cases, the mechanism is confirmed and the fitted V becomes a proxy for a more fundamental correction.
  • The Fe result hints that r2SCAN+V could be applied to magnetic surfaces, alloys, or heterostructures where SCAN-family over-magnetization is known, but the V value would likely need re-fitting, so transferability remains an open question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a unified explanation for several known r2SCAN/SCAN failures—graphene's spurious bandgap, the overestimated magnetic moment of bcc Fe, the Cr2 potential energy curve, and the VO2 dimer bond length—attributing them to insufficient electron localization in 'non-compact covalent bonds' formed through s-s, p-p, or d-d hybridization. The authors introduce r2SCAN+V, an inter-site Hubbard-like correction, and show that adding a positive V to neighboring orbitals closes the graphene gap, reduces Fe/Cr moments, reproduces the Cr2 binding curve, and corrects the VO2 bond length. The proposed mechanism is supported by electron redistribution maps and pCOHP analysis. The authors are explicit in Section 5 that the optimal V values are chosen to reproduce specific experimental quantities, and the Cr2 treatment uses a piecewise rule for Vss starting at 2.4 Å.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a systematic missing ingredient in meta-GGA functionals and offers a practical correction for a class of correlated materials. Strengths include cross-code validation (VASP and Quantum Espresso), a non-self-consistent control, an honest acknowledgment that V values are fitted, and a pCOHP analysis that connects covalent bonding to the observed failures. However, the evidence for the 'under-localization in non-compact bonds' premise is largely circular: the electron redistribution maps display only the effect of the fitted +V potential, not an independent comparison of r2SCAN with PBE. The per-material fitted V, the geometry-dependent Cr2 rule, and the fixed-lattice VO2 calculation considerably weaken the strength of the conclusions. These issues are addressable but require additional analysis and more rigorous testing.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5; Figs. 1b, 2b, 3a, 5a] The paper states (Sec. 5) that 'the optimal V values in r2SCAN+V, which are chosen to best reproduce specific experimental quantities' show considerable variation (Vpp ≥ 2 eV for graphene, Vdd=0.8 eV for Cr2, Vdd=0.5 eV for VO2, Vdd=2 eV for Cr, Vdd=4 eV for Fe). Each successful result is therefore a fit, not a prediction. The abstract's claim that r2SCAN+V 'improves accuracy across all tested materials' is weakened by this fitting. A stronger test would use a single V, a parameter-free estimate (e.g., from linear response where it is reliable), or an out-of-sample validation (V determined from one observable predicting another). Without this, the common-mechanism claim is insufficiently supported.
  2. [Fig. 2b caption; Sec. 3] Cr2 uses Vdd at all bond lengths but Vss only for r ≥ 2.4 Å. This piecewise rule introduces a second parameter plus a threshold and is not derived from a physical argument. It directly contradicts the 'one-parameter +V correction' language in the abstract and significance statement. A smooth bond-length dependence of V, or an independent criterion for activating Vss, is needed before the Cr2 result can be considered a genuine one-parameter success.
  3. [Sec. 3; Fig. S4] The non-self-consistent control (r2SCAN@r2SCAN+V) yields nearly the same binding energy curve as self-consistent r2SCAN+V. This implies that the energetic effect of V is dominated by the explicit V energy term, not by the density reorganization that the paper identifies as the mechanism. The statement that 'it is not this density change itself but the nonlocality of the functional producing it that is most important' is an assertion; the provided test does not demonstrate it. A decomposition of the total energy change into the V expectation term and the density-driven contribution would clarify the actual mechanism.
  4. [Sec. 4; Fig. 3a] The VO2 calculations fix lattice constants to experimental values ('due to technical constraints', Fig. 3a caption), while it is unclear whether the same constraint is used for all comparison methods (PBE, r2SCAN, HSE, PBE+U, etc.). If only r2SCAN+V is compared with fixed lattice constants, the comparison is not apples-to-apples. Please specify exactly which methods used fixed versus relaxed lattices and discuss the sensitivity of the bond-length result to this constraint.
  5. [Secs. 2–4; Figs. 1b, 2f, 3f, 4c-d] The premise that r2SCAN under-localizes bond-centered electrons relative to PBE is not independently established. The ∆n maps show only the effect of +V (n(r2SCAN+V) − n(r2SCAN)), not a comparison of r2SCAN and PBE densities. A direct comparison (e.g., n(r2SCAN) − n(PBE) or an electron-localization indicator such as ELF) in graphene, Cr2, VO2, and Fe would test the causal mechanism and avoid the circularity of inferring the deficit from the very potential used to fix it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Significance] The abstract and significance statement call r2SCAN+V a 'one-parameter' correction, but the Cr2 treatment requires Vdd and Vss plus a bond-length threshold. Please revise the wording to reflect the actual parameter count.
  2. [Sec. 1, Eq. (1)] The equation for the corrective potential ∆P_i = U(1/2 − n_i) is rendered with garbled notation; please ensure it is typeset correctly.
  3. [Sec. 4; Fig. 4] The pCOHP analysis is performed with PBE, with r2SCAN results relegated to Fig. S8. A sentence in the main text stating whether r2SCAN gives the same trend would strengthen the connection between covalency and the r2SCAN failure.
  4. [Sec. 3; Fig. S3] The claim that 'V values ... tightly constrained around 0.8 eV' would benefit from a quantitative statement of the acceptable range shown in Fig. S3. Also, the term 'non-compact covalent bond' is used throughout but never quantitatively defined; consider adding a compactness metric.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

r2SCAN+V agreements are fitted, not predicted; the bond-localization evidence is definitional.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, text after Fig. 5a; also Sections 2-4 for graphene, Cr2, and VO2]
    "The optimal V values in r2SCAN+V, which are chosen to best reproduce specific experimental quantities, show considerable variation across the tested materials."

    Each headline agreement is obtained by tuning V to the target: graphene's gap closes near V=2 eV, Fe's moment matches experiment near V=4 eV, Cr2's curve is matched with Vdd=Vss=0.8 eV, and VO2's bond length is matched with V=0.5 eV. The quoted sentence concedes this tuning directly, so presenting the resulting agreement as a successful 'prediction' of those exact quantities is circular: the target is imposed by the fit. The comparison to experiment is therefore a consistency check of the fit, not an out-of-sample test.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Figure 2 caption, Section 3]
    "In subplot (b), while Vdd is applied at all bond lengths, Vss is only applied to the shelf structure starting at 2.4 Å."

    The geometry-dependent on/off rule for Vss is introduced specifically to reproduce the experimental shelf in Cr2, with no independent derivation of the threshold distance. This makes the Cr2 result a multi-parameter fit: Vdd, Vss, and the 2.4 Å switch are all chosen to match the curve. The paper's 'one-parameter +V' framing is therefore only achieved by this additional piecewise rule, and the good agreement with experiment is built into the rule rather than predicted from it.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Section 2, text after the extended-Hubbard Hamiltonian; Figure 1b insets]
    "Clearly, a positive V discourages electrons simultaneously sitting on nearby atomic sites, effectively encouraging electrons to accumulate elsewhere such as at a non-compact bond center. ... The insets depict the electron redistribution pattern: the V potential discourages electron occupation in the p_z orbitals, instead encouraging their accumulation near the bond center."

    The paper presents the +V-induced electron redistribution, Δn = n_r2SCAN+V − n_r2SCAN, as evidence that r2SCAN under-localizes non-compact bonds. But that redistribution is the direct, definitional effect of the inter-site V term: a positive V is constructed to push electrons off atomic sites and into bond centers. Observing that the constructed potential does what it was designed to do is not independent evidence of an r2SCAN-specific deficit, and no comparison to PBE's bond-center localization is provided.

full rationale

The central numerical claims of this paper are fitted, not derived. The authors explicitly state that V values are chosen to best reproduce specific experimental quantities, and then report the resulting agreement for graphene, Cr2, VO2, Cr, and Fe as support for r2SCAN+V. That is the classic fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the experimental target is used to set the parameter, and the same target is quoted as the successful outcome. The Cr2 case is especially clear because Vss is switched on only beyond 2.4 Å to reproduce the shelf, so the 'one-parameter' claim actually requires Vdd, Vss, and a distance threshold chosen by hand. The density-redistribution figures provide definitional rather than independent evidence, since V is defined as an inter-site repulsion that pushes electrons toward bond centers. The paper's own non-self-consistent check (Fig. S4) further states that the density change from V has little effect on the binding energy curve of Cr2, which undermines the mechanistic claim that improved bond-centered electron localization drives the energetics; the improvement appears to come largely from the constructed V energy term. I score this 6 rather than 8 because there is independent content: the pCOHP bonding analysis, the comparisons with r2SCAN-L and OFR2, and the observation that the needed V is small and consistent across several materials are genuine, but they do not make the fitted 'predictions' non-circular. The honest summary is that r2SCAN+V is an empirical two-parameter-plus-switch correction that can be tuned to match multiple failures of r2SCAN, while the common non-compact-bond mechanism remains a hypothesis that is not independently established outside the +V construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The ledger is dominated by fitted V parameters: five materials, five different V values, each tuned to reproduce the experimental quantity the paper then reports as improved. Auxiliary fits include U = 2.0 eV in the PBE+Ud+Vdd analyses and V = 2.2 eV for VO2. No new physical entities are introduced; the paper's conceptual invention is the 'non-compact covalent bond' categorization, which has no independent falsifiable handle beyond the fitted corrections themselves. Core axioms are standard DFT assumptions plus domain-specific choices (extended-Hubbard correction form, spin-symmetry breaking, fixed experimental lattice for VO2).

free parameters (6)
  • Vpp (graphene) = ≈ 2.0 eV
    Fitted to close the r2SCAN bandgap and eliminate the magnetic moment; target is the experimental semimetallic ground state (§2, Fig. 1b).
  • Vdd = Vss (Cr2) = 0.8 eV each
    Fitted to reproduce the experimental potential energy curve; Vss is applied only for the shelf r ≥ 2.4 Å (Fig. 2b caption, §3).
  • Vdd (VO2) = 0.5 eV
    Chosen so the V-V dimer length matches the experimental 2.62 Å (§4, Fig. 3a).
  • Vdd (Cr) = 2.0 eV
    Fitted so the magnetic moment matches the experimental 0.51 μB (§5, Fig. 5a).
  • Vdd (Fe) = 4.0 eV
    Fitted so the magnetic moment matches the experimental 2.22 μB (§5, Fig. 5a); the abstract explicitly quotes this value.
  • U and V for PBE+Ud+Vdd analysis = U = 2.0 eV; V = 2.2 eV (Cr2, VO2), V = 0.8 eV (PBE+Vdd)
    Fixed by hand and fine-tuned to support the argument that PBE's accuracy is accidental (§3, §4); not the central r2SCAN+V claim but load-bearing for the interpretation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Kohn-Sham DFT with semilocal functionals is the correct framework for these materials
    Background for the entire study; no non-DFT benchmark is performed.
  • domain assumption The extended-Hubbard DFT+V correction ΔP_i = V Σ_j (1/2 − n_j) with atom-centered projections captures intersite physics
    Adopted from Campo & Cococcioni (ref [31]); no independent verification that this form is adequate for non-compact bonds.
  • domain assumption Spin-symmetry breaking is physically valid for Cr2 and VO2 despite their singlet ground states
    Discussed in §3 and §4; the paper leans on refs [49,50,53], but this treatment is contested (ref [52]); correctness of the SSB route is load-bearing for the VO2 results.
  • domain assumption Experimental reference data used as fit targets are reliable
    PEC of Cr2 from negative-ion photoelectron spectroscopy [44]; moments from neutron/saturation measurements [60,61].
  • ad hoc to paper Fixing lattice constants to experimental values is acceptable for VO2
    Acknowledged in §4: "lattice constants are fixed to their experimental values due to technical constraints"; this removes a degree of freedom that could change the fitted V.
  • domain assumption Density-driven errors are small, so non-self-consistent r2SCAN@r2SCAN+V is a valid control
    §3 and Fig. S4; relies on refs [47,48].
invented entities (1)
  • "Non-compact covalent bond" (bond-centered electron localization channel)
    purpose: Classification unifying the r2SCAN failures and motivating the +V correction
    Introduced and argued via redistribution plots (Figs. 2c-f, 3d-f, 4c-d) that show +V moves density to bond centers — but that is the channel the V operator, by construction, acts on. This is a categorization inferred from the fit's success, not an independently measured entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron Localization in Non-Compact Covalent Bonds Captured by the r2SCAN+V Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S6FN5Y4L

@misc{pith2026251016348,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron Localization in Non-Compact Covalent Bonds Captured by the r2SCAN+V Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S6FN5Y4L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.16348}
}
read the original abstract

In density functional theory, the SCAN (Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed) and r2SCAN functionals significantly improve over generalized gradient approximation functionals such as PBE (Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof) in predicting electronic, magnetic, and structural properties across various materials, including transition-metal compounds. However, there remain puzzling cases where SCAN and r2SCAN underperform, such as in calculating the band structure of graphene, the magnetic moment of Fe, the potential energy curve of the Cr2 molecule, and the bond length of VO2. This research identifies a common characteristic among these challenging materials: non-compact covalent bonding through s-s, p-p, or d-d electron hybridization. While SCAN and r2SCAN excel at capturing electron localization at local atomic sites, they struggle to accurately describe electron localization in non-compact covalent bonds, resulting in a biased improvement. To address this issue, we propose the r2SCAN+V approach as a practical modification that improves accuracy across all the tested materials. The parameter V is 4 eV for metallic Fe, but substantially lower for the other cases. Our findings provide valuable insights for the future development of advanced functionals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.16348 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electronic properties of graphene. (a) Bands derived from the pz orbitals. The calculation uses r 2 SCAN, with and without spin-symmetry-breaking. (b) Bandgap and magnetic moment as functions of V values in r2 SCAN+V. The insets illustrate electron redistribution patterns induced by the V (2 eV) potential, represented as ∆𝑛𝑛 = 𝑛𝑛r2SCAN+𝑉𝑉 − 𝑛𝑛r2SCAN. The upper inset is a 3D plot, while the lower inset provides a 2D … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Electronic properties of the Cr2 molecule. (a,b) Potential energy curve predicted by various methods. The experimental results are cited from [44]. In subplot (b), while Vdd is applied at all bond lengths, Vss is only applied to the shelf structure starting at 2.4 Å. (c) Patterns of electron redistribution due to the additional corrections, represented as ∆𝑛𝑛 = 𝑛𝑛PBE+𝑈𝑈𝑑𝑑(2eV) − 𝑛𝑛PBE . (d) ∆𝑛𝑛 = 𝑛𝑛PBE+𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(0.8eV)… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Self -Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects . Physical Review. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  2. [2]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, Matthias Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, Matthias Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple . Physical Review Letters. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  3. [3]

    Bryenton, Adebayo A

    Kyle R. Bryenton, Adebayo A. Adeleke, Stephen G. Dale, Erin R. Johnson, Delocalization error: The greatest outstanding challenge in density‐functional theory. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 13, e1631 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Physical review B

    John P Perdew, Alex Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density -functional approximations for many -electron systems. Physical review B. 23, 5048 (1981)

    1981

  5. [5]

    Cohen, Paula Mori -Sánchez, Weitao Yang, Insights into Current Limitations of Density Functional Theory

    Aron J. Cohen, Paula Mori -Sánchez, Weitao Yang, Insights into Current Limitations of Density Functional Theory . Science. 321, 792 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Anisimov, Jan Zaanen, Ole K

    Vladimir I. Anisimov, Jan Zaanen, Ole K. Andersen, Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Physical Review B. 44, 943 (1991)

    1991

  7. [7]

    Anisimov Vladimir, F

    I. Anisimov Vladimir, F. Aryasetiawan, A. I. Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+U method. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 9, 767 (1997)

    1997

  8. [8]

    Physical Review B

    Matteo Cococcioni, Stefano de Gironcoli, Linear response approach to the calculati on of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA+U method. Physical Review B. 71, 035105 (2005)

    2005

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

    Eric Macke, Iurii Timrov, Nicola Marzari, Lucio Colombi Ciacchi, Orbital-Resolved DFT+U for Molecules and Solids. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 20, 4824 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics

    Da Ke, Jianwei Sun, Yubo Zhang, Accurate DFT Simulation of Complex Functional Materials: Synergistic Enhancements Achieved by SCAN meta-GGA. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 162, 014107 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Scuseria, Matthias Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential

    Jochen Heyd, Gustavo E. Scuseria, Matthias Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential . The Journal of Chemical Physics. 118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential

    Jochen Heyd, Gustavo E. Scuseria, Matthias Ernzerhof, Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)]. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 124, 219906 (2006)

    2003

  5. [13]

    Abtew, Tianyi Cai, Yi-Yang Sun, Shengbai Zhang, Peihong Zhang, On the applicability of hybrid functionals for predicting fundamental properties of metals

    Weiwei Gao, Tesfaye A. Abtew, Tianyi Cai, Yi-Yang Sun, Shengbai Zhang, Peihong Zhang, On the applicability of hybrid functionals for predicting fundamental properties of metals. Solid State Communications. 234-235, 10 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Furness, Ruiqi Zhang, Jinliang Ning, Bernardo Barbiellini, Robert S

    Kanun Pokharel, Christopher Lane, James W. Furness, Ruiqi Zhang, Jinliang Ning, Bernardo Barbiellini, Robert S. Markiewicz, Yubo Zhang, Arun Bansil, Jianwei Sun, Sensitivity of the electronic and magnetic structures of cuprate superconductors to density functional approximatio...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Physical Review Letters

    Jianwei Sun, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, John P Perdew, Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional. Physical Review Letters. 115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

    James W Furness, Aaron D Kaplan, Jinliang Ning, John P Perdew, Jianwei Sun, Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 11, 8208 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Furness, Jinliang Ning, Ruiqi Zhang, Jianwei Sun, Advances and Challenges of SCAN and r 2SCAN Density Functionals in Transition-Metal Compounds

    Yubo Zhang, Akilan Ramasamy, Kanun Pokharel, Manish Kothakonda, Bing Xiao, James W. Furness, Jinliang Ning, Ruiqi Zhang, Jianwei Sun, Advances and Challenges of SCAN and r 2SCAN Density Functionals in Transition-Metal Compounds. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 15, e70007 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Swathilakshmi, R

    S. Swathilakshmi, R. Devi, G. Sai Gautam, Performance of the r2SCAN Functional in Transition Metal Oxides. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 19, 4202 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    J. Sun, R. C. Remsing, Y . Zhang, Z. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, H. Peng, Z. Yang, A. Paul, U. Waghmare, X. Wu, M. L. Klein, J. P. Perdew, Accurate first-principles structures and energies of diversely bonded systems from an efficient density functional. Nature Chemistry. 8, 831 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Furness, Yubo Zhang, Christopher Lane, Ioana Gianina Buda, Bernardo Barbiellini, Robert S

    James W. Furness, Yubo Zhang, Christopher Lane, Ioana Gianina Buda, Bernardo Barbiellini, Robert S. Markiewicz, Page 12 of 14 Arun Bansil, Jianwei Sun, An accurate first -principles treatment of doping -dependent electronic structure of high- temperature cuprate superconductor...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    Yubo Zhang, Christopher Lane, James W Furness, Bernardo Barbiellini, John P Perdew, Robert S Markiewicz, Arun Bansil, Jianwei Sun, Competing stripe and magnetic phases in the cuprates from first principles . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 117, 68 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Furness, Bing Xiao, Jianwei Sun, Subtlety of TiO 2 phase stability: Reliability of the density functional theory predictions and persistence of the self -interaction error

    Yubo Zhang, James W. Furness, Bing Xiao, Jianwei Sun, Subtlety of TiO 2 phase stability: Reliability of the density functional theory predictions and persistence of the self -interaction error. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 150, 014105 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Physical Review B

    Yubo Zhang, James Furness, Ruiqi Zhang, Zhi Wang, Alex Zunger, Jianwei Sun, Symmetry -breaking polymorphous descriptions for correlated materials without interelectronic U. Physical Review B. 102, 045112 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Csonka, Gustavo E

    Jianwei Sun, Bing Xiao, Yuan Fang, Robin Haunschild, Pan Hao, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, Gábor I. Csonka, Gustavo E. Scuseria, John P. Perdew, Density Functionals that Recognize Covalent, Metallic, and Weak Bonds. Physical Review Letters. 111, 106401 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Shukla, J

    Rohan Maniar, Priyanka B. Shukla, J. Karl Johnson, Koblar A. Jackson, John P. Perdew, Atomic ionization: sd energy imbalance and Perdew–Zunger self-interaction correction energy penalty in 3d atoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122, e2418305122 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20635 (2025)

    Harshan Reddy Gopidi, Ruiqi Zhang, Yanyong Wang, Abhirup Patra, Jianwei Sun, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, John P Perdew, Pieremanuele Canepa, Reducing Self -Interaction Error in Transition- Metal Oxides with Different Exact- Exchange Fractions for Energy and Density. arXiv preprint arX...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Singh, Applicability of the Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Density Functional to Transition-Metal Magnetism

    Y uhao Fu, David J. Singh, Applicability of the Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Density Functional to Transition-Metal Magnetism. Physical Review Letters. 121, 207201 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Singh, Localization in the SCAN meta- generalized gradient approximation functional leading to broken symmetry ground states for graphene and benzene

    Y ubo Zhang, Wenqing Zhang, David J. Singh, Localization in the SCAN meta- generalized gradient approximation functional leading to broken symmetry ground states for graphene and benzene. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 22, 19585 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    J Chem Phys

    Yubo Zhang, Da Ke, Junxiong Wu, Chutong Zhang, Lin Hou, Baichen Lin, Zuhuang Chen, John P Perdew, Jianwei Sun, Challenges for density functional theory in simulating metal -metal singlet bonding: A case study of dimerized VO2. J Chem Phys. 160, 134101 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Perdew, Xifan Wu, Comparative first-principles studies of prototypical ferroelectric materials by LDA, GGA, and SCAN meta-GGA

    Yubo Zhang, Jianwei Sun, John P. Perdew, Xifan Wu, Comparative first-principles studies of prototypical ferroelectric materials by LDA, GGA, and SCAN meta-GGA. Physical Review B. 96, 035143 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

    Vivaldo Leiria Campo, Matteo Cococcioni, Extended DFT +U+V method with on- site and inter -site electronic interactions. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 22, 055602 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Kulik, Nicola Marzari, Transition -metal dioxides: A case for the intersite term in Hubbard- model functionals

    Heather J. Kulik, Nicola Marzari, Transition -metal dioxides: A case for the intersite term in Hubbard- model functionals. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 134, 094103 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Physical Review Materials

    Matteo Cococcioni, Nicola Marzari, Energetics and cathode voltages of LiMPO4 olivines (M = Fe, Mn) from extended Hubbard functionals. Physical Review Materials. 3, 033801 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    PRX Energy

    Iurii Timrov, Francesc o Aquilante, Matteo Cococcioni, Nicola Marzari, Accurate Electronic Properties and Intercalation V oltages of Olivine-Type Li-Ion Cathode Materials from Extended Hubbard Functionals . PRX Energy. 1, 033003 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Gebreyesus, Lorenzo Bastonero, Michele Kotiuga, Nicola Marzari, Iurii Timrov, Understanding the role of Hubbard corrections in the rhombohedral phase of BaTiO3

    G. Gebreyesus, Lorenzo Bastonero, Michele Kotiuga, Nicola Marzari, Iurii Timrov, Understanding the role of Hubbard corrections in the rhombohedral phase of BaTiO3. Physical Review B. 108, 235171 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Drut, Timo A

    Joaquín E. Drut, Timo A. Lähde, Is Graphene in Vacuum an Insulator? Physical Review Letters. 102, 026802 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Schüler, E

    M. Schüler, E. G. C. P. van Loon, M. I. Katsnelson, T. O. Wehling, First -order metal-insulator transitions in the extended Hubbard model due to self-consistent screening of the effective interaction. Physical Review B. 97, 165135 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Schüler, M

    M. Schüler, M. Rösner, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, Optimal Hubbard Models for Materials with Nonlocal Coulomb Interactions: Graphene, Silicene, and Benzene. Physical Review Letters. 111, 036601 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands - IV

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands - IV . The atomic representation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 285, 542 (1965)

    1965

  32. [40]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands V

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands V . A perturbation expansion about the atomic limit . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 296, 82 (1967)

    1967

  33. [41]

    M. V . Ulybyshev, P. V . Buividovich, M. I. Katsnelson, M. I. Polikarpov, Monte Carlo Study of the Semimetal-Insulator Phase Transition in Monolayer Graphene with a Realistic Interelectron Interaction Potential. Physical Review Letters. 111, 056801 (2013). Page 13 of 14

    2013

  34. [42]

    Larsson, Huanchen Zhai, C

    Henrik R. Larsson, Huanchen Zhai, C. J. Umrigar, Garnet Kin -Lic Chan, The Chromium D imer: Closing a Chapter of Quantum Chemistry. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 144, 15932 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Perdew, Karla Schmidt, Jacob’ s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange -correlation energy

    John P. Perdew, Karla Schmidt, Jacob’ s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange -correlation energy. AIP Conference Proceedings. 577, 1 (2001)

    2001

  36. [44]

    Casey, Doreen G

    Sean M. Casey, Doreen G. Leopold, Negative ion photoelectron spectroscopy of chromium dimer . The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 97, 816 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Daniel Mejía -Rodríguez, S. B. Trickey, Meta -GGA performance in solids at almost GGA cost. Physical Review B. 102, 121109 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Kaplan, John P

    Aaron D. Kaplan, John P. Perdew, Laplacian-level meta -generalized gradient approximation for solid and liquid metals. Physical Review Materials. 6, 083803 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Physical Review Letters

    Min-Cheol Kim, Eunji Sim, Kieron Burke, Understanding and reducing errors in density functional calculations . Physical Review Letters. 111, 073003 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Kaplan, Chandra Shahi, Raj K

    Aaron D. Kaplan, Chandra Shahi, Raj K. Sah, Pradeep Bhetwal, Bikash Kanungo, Vikram Gavini, John P. Perdew, How Does HF-DFT Achieve Chemical Accuracy for Water Clusters? Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 20, 5517 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    John P Perdew, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, Jianwei Sun, Niraj K Nepal, Aaron D Kaplan, Interpretations of ground-state symmetry breaking and strong correlation i n wavefunction and density functional theories . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 118, e2017850 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    John P. Perdew, SCAN meta -GGA, strong correlation, symmetry breaking, self -interaction correction, and semi - classical limit in density functional theory: Hidden connections and beneficial synergies? APL Computational Physics. 1, 010903 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Eyert, The metal-insulator transitions of VO2: A band theoretical approach

    V . Eyert, The metal-insulator transitions of VO2: A band theoretical approach. Annalen der Physik. 514, 650 (2002)

    2002

  44. [52]

    Spaldin, Claude Ederer, Incorporating static intersite correlation effects in vanadium dioxide through DFT+V

    Lea Haas, Peter Mlkvik, Nicola A. Spaldin, Claude Ederer, Incorporating static intersite correlation effects in vanadium dioxide through DFT+V. Physical Review Research. 6, 043177 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Rohan Maniar, Kushantha P. K. Withanage, Chandra Shahi, Aaron D. Kaplan, John P. Perdew, Mark R. Pederson, Symmetry breaking and self-interaction correction in the chromium atom and dimer. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 160, 144301 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    J. A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, P. Ring, L. M. Robledo, C. Yannouleas, Symmetry restoration in mean-field approaches. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. 48, 123001 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Isaacs, Chris Wolverton, Performance of the strongly constrained and appropriately normed density functional for solid-state materials

    Eric B. Isaacs, Chris Wolverton, Performance of the strongly constrained and appropriately normed density functional for solid-state materials. Physical Review Materials. 2, 063801 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Romero, Matthieu J

    Aldo H. Romero, Matthieu J. Verstraete, From one to three, exploring the rungs of Jacob’ s ladder in magnetic alloys. The European Physical Journal B. 91, 193 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Bloechl, Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density -functional calculations

    Richard Dronskowski, Peter E. Bloechl, Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density -functional calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 97, 8617 (1993)

    1993

  50. [58]

    Deringer, Andrei L

    V olker L. Deringer, Andrei L. Tchougréeff, Richard Dronskowski, Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population (COHP) Analysis As Projected from Plane-Wave Basis Sets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 115, 5461 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    O Kvashnin, R

    Y . O Kvashnin, R. Cardias, A. Szilva, I. Di Marco, M. I Katsnelson, A. I Lichtenstein, L. Nordström, A. B Klautau, O. Eriksson, Microscopic Origin of Heisenberg and Non-Heisenberg Exchange Interactions in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe. Physical Review Letters. 116, 217202 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Arrott, S

    A. Arrott, S. A. Werner, H. Kendrick, Neutron-Diffraction Study of Dilute Chromium Alloys with Iron. Physical Review. 153, 624 (1967)

    1967

  53. [61]

    Danan, A

    H. Danan, A. Herr, A. J. P . Meyer, New Determinations of the Saturation Magnetization of Nickel and Iron. Journal of Applied Physics. 39, 669 (1968)

    1968

  54. [62]

    H. P. Myers, Willie Sucksmith, The spontaneous magnetization of cobalt. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 207, 427 (1951)

    1951

  55. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08887, (2024)

    Akilan Ramasamy, Lin Hou, Jorge Vega Bazantes, Tom JP Irons, Andrew M Wibowo- Teale, Jianwei Sun, How Semilocal Are Semilocal Density Functional Approximations?- Tackling Self- Interaction Error in One -Electron Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08887, (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Pederson, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, John P

    Mark R. Pederson, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, John P. Perdew, Communication: Self -interaction correction with unitary invariance in density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 140, 121103 (2014). Page 14 of 14

    2014

  57. [65]

    Sah, Juan E

    Chandra Shahi, Rohan Maniar, Jinliang Ning, R aj K. Sah, Juan E. Peralta, Koblar A. Jackson, John P. Perdew, Local Spin Density Approximation Greatly Improved by a Better-Informed Local Scaling of Its Self-Interaction Correction. In preparation

  58. [66]

    Jackson, Juan E

    Chandra Shahi, Puskar Bhattarai, Kamal Wagle, Bisw ajit Santra, Sebastian Schwalbe, Torsten Hahn, Jens Kortus, Koblar A. Jackson, Juan E. Peralta, Kai Trepte, Susi Lehtola, Niraj K. Nepal, Hemanadhan Myneni, Bimal Neupane, Santosh Adhikari, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, Yoh Yamamoto, Tu...

    2019

  59. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20662, (2025)

    Lin Hou, Cody Woods, Yanyong Wang, Jorge Vega Bazantes, Ruiqi Zhang, Shimin Zhang, Erik Alfredo Perez Caro, Yuan Ping, Timo Lebeda, Jianwei Sun, Artificial Symmetry Breaking by Self- Interaction Error . arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20662, (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Physical Review Letters

    Timo Lebeda, Thilo Aschebrock, Stephan Kümmel, Balancing the Contributions to the Gradient Expansion: Accurate Binding and Band Gaps with a Nonempirical Meta-GGA. Physical Review Letters. 133, 136402 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Physical Review B

    Timo Lebeda, Stephan Kümmel, Meta -GGA that describes weak interactions in addition to bond energies and band gaps. Physical Review B. 111, 155133 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    Desmarais, Alessandro Erba, Giovanni Vignale, Stefano Pittalis, Meta -Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Magnetic

    Jacques K. Desmarais, Alessandro Erba, Giovanni Vignale, Stefano Pittalis, Meta -Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Magnetic. Physical Review Letters. 134, 106402 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.