pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.18843 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-21 · 📊 stat.ME · math.ST· stat.ML· stat.TH

Recognition: unknown

Inference on Variable Importance for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: Shapley Values and Beyond

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.ME math.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords treatmentvariableimportancealgorithmseffectheterogeneityinferenceacross
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We provide an inferential framework to assess variable importance for heterogeneous treatment effects. This assessment is especially useful in high-risk domains such as medicine, where decision makers hesitate to rely on black-box treatment recommendation algorithms. The variable importance measures we consider are local in that they may differ across individuals, while the inference is global in that it tests whether a given variable is important for any individual. Our approach builds on recent developments in semiparametric theory for function-valued parameters, and is valid even when statistical machine learning algorithms are employed to quantify treatment effect heterogeneity. We demonstrate the applicability of our method to infectious disease prevention strategies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ConfoundingSHAP defines a custom Shapley game to attribute confounding strength to individual covariates and uses TabPFN to estimate it scalably without exhaustive refitting.