pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.20804 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el· cond-mat.supr-con

Anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords anomalous Hall effectrhombohedral grapheneimpurity scatteringKubo-Streda formulaskew scatteringwarping effectsquarter metal
0
0 comments X

The pith

The anomalous Hall conductivity in rhombohedral graphene arises from intrinsic, side-jump, and multiple skew-scattering processes computed via diagrammatic expansion for different impurity regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the anomalous Hall conductivity for rhombohedral stacked multilayer graphene in a spontaneous spin-valley polarized quarter metal state. It uses the Kubo-Streda diagrammatic approach to treat two impurity types: weak dense impurities via Gaussian disorder and strong sparse impurities. Non-crossing diagrams capture intrinsic, side-jump, and Gaussian skew-scattering contributions, while additional crossing diagrams X and Ψ account for diffractive skew-scattering, and the Mercedes star diagram handles non-Gaussian skew-scattering. Analytical solutions are derived for an isotropic model, with warping effects included only perturbatively because they shape the low-energy bands.

Core claim

The anomalous Hall conductivity σ_xy is obtained by summing all non-crossing diagrams for intrinsic, side-jump and Gaussian skew-scattering contributions together with diagrams X and Ψ that represent diffractive skew-scattering processes in the Gaussian disorder model, plus the Mercedes star diagram for non-Gaussian skew scattering when impurities are strong and sparse, after first solving the isotropic case analytically and then adding warping perturbatively.

What carries the argument

Kubo-Streda diagrammatic expansion that systematically includes non-crossing impurity diagrams plus selected crossing diagrams for skew-scattering contributions to the Hall conductivity.

If this is right

  • Different impurity regimes produce qualitatively different balances among intrinsic, side-jump, and skew-scattering contributions to the Hall conductivity.
  • Warping, although treated perturbatively, modifies the low-energy Hall response in a measurable way.
  • The diagrammatic results supply a microscopic basis for the anomalous Hall effect reported in recent experiments on rhombohedral multilayer graphene.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same diagrammatic bookkeeping could be applied to other spontaneously valley-polarized 2D systems to predict how impurity engineering alters the Hall response.
  • Varying the ratio of weak to strong impurities might allow experimental control over the relative weight of diffractive versus non-Gaussian skew scattering.
  • The calculated conductivity expressions could be inserted into transport simulations to test consistency with finite-temperature or finite-size data.

Load-bearing premise

The main analytical solutions assume an isotropic dispersion relation and treat band warping only as a small perturbation.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the anomalous Hall conductivity versus impurity density or scattering strength that cannot be reproduced by any combination of the calculated intrinsic, side-jump, Gaussian skew, diffractive skew, and non-Gaussian skew terms would falsify the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.20804 by Daniele Guerci, Daniel Kaplan, Elio J. K\"onig, Vera Mikheeva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic band structure of rhombohedral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Exemplary diagrams for the anomalous Hall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Example diagram of the side-jump contribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Intrinsic Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Full anomalous Hall conductivity (one val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent experiments on rhombohedral stacked multilayer graphene and the observation of the anomalous Hall effect in a spontaneous spin-valley polarized quarter metal state, we calculate the anomalous Hall conductivity for this system in the presence of two types of impurities: weak and dense as well as sparse and strong. Our calculation of $\sigma_{xy}$ is based on the Kubo-Streda diagrammatic approach. In a model with Gaussian disorder applicable to weak dense impurities, this involves all non-crossing diagrams (intrinsic, side-jump and Gaussian skew-scattering contributions) and additionally diagrams with two intersecting impurities, X and $\Psi$, representing diffractive skew-scattering processes. A "Mercedes star" diagram (non-Gaussian skew scattering) is furthermore included to treat in the case of strong, sparse impurities. We supplement our asymptotically exact analytical solutions for an isotropic model without warping effects by semi-numerical calculations accounting perturbatively for warping, which plays a crucial role in the low-energy band structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the anomalous Hall conductivity σ_xy in rhombohedral stacked multilayer graphene in the spontaneous spin-valley polarized quarter-metal state. It uses the Kubo-Středa diagrammatic approach, incorporating intrinsic, side-jump, Gaussian skew-scattering, diffractive skew-scattering (X and Ψ diagrams with intersecting impurities), and non-Gaussian skew-scattering (Mercedes-star diagram) contributions for weak-dense and strong-sparse impurity regimes. Asymptotically exact analytical solutions are derived for an isotropic model without warping, supplemented by semi-numerical calculations that include warping perturbatively.

Significance. If the central results hold, this provides a systematic microscopic theory for the anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene quarter metals, addressing recent experimental observations through a comprehensive treatment of disorder scattering channels. The inclusion of higher-order diagrams beyond standard non-crossing approximations and the attempt at asymptotically exact analytics for the isotropic case are strengths. The work could help interpret the role of impurities in stabilizing the observed AHE.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The abstract states that warping 'plays a crucial role in the low-energy band structure,' yet the asymptotically exact analytical solutions for σ_xy are derived exclusively for an isotropic model without warping effects, with warping added only perturbatively in later semi-numerical calculations. If warping is essential, this raises a load-bearing concern that the leading analytical expressions may miss non-analytic or higher-order contributions dominant in the quarter-metal regime, and the validity of the perturbative correction is not demonstrated.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract describes the diagrammatic program in detail but does not include explicit final expressions for the conductivity contributions or direct numerical outputs; providing these in the main text or supplementary material would aid verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and propose revisions to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: The abstract states that warping 'plays a crucial role in the low-energy band structure,' yet the asymptotically exact analytical solutions for σ_xy are derived exclusively for an isotropic model without warping effects, with warping added only perturbatively in later semi-numerical calculations. If warping is essential, this raises a load-bearing concern that the leading analytical expressions may miss non-analytic or higher-order contributions dominant in the quarter-metal regime, and the validity of the perturbative correction is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this potential inconsistency. The abstract emphasizes warping's role in the low-energy band structure of rhombohedral graphene to motivate the overall study and the semi-numerical results. The asymptotically exact analytical expressions are obtained for the isotropic model (without warping) because this limit permits a complete summation of all diagrams (intrinsic, side-jump, Gaussian skew-scattering, X/Ψ diffractive, and Mercedes-star non-Gaussian) within the Kubo-Středa formalism for both weak-dense and strong-sparse impurity regimes. Warping is then added perturbatively in the semi-numerical calculations, as it represents a small correction relative to the dominant energy scales in the quarter-metal regime. We maintain that non-analytic or higher-order contributions arising from warping enter only at sub-leading orders in the perturbative parameter and do not alter the leading analytical results. To resolve the concern, we will revise the abstract to explicitly distinguish the isotropic analytical results from the perturbative warping treatment and add a short paragraph in the main text justifying the perturbative validity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conductivity derived from microscopic model via standard diagrams

full rationale

The paper derives the anomalous Hall conductivity σ_xy from the Kubo-Streda diagrammatic expansion applied directly to a microscopic Hamiltonian with Gaussian or non-Gaussian disorder. All listed contributions (intrinsic, side-jump, Gaussian skew, diffractive X/Ψ, Mercedes-star) are computed from the model parameters and impurity scattering without any parameter being fitted to the target conductivity or renamed as a prediction. The isotropic analytical solutions without warping are supplemented by perturbative corrections; this is an explicit approximation choice rather than a self-definitional or self-citation reduction. No load-bearing step collapses to a prior self-citation or to the result itself by construction, so the derivation chain remains independent of its outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard transport theory for disordered electrons together with the assumption that selected diagram classes capture the leading impurity effects in each regime.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Kubo-Streda formula correctly gives the Hall conductivity when all relevant impurity diagrams are summed.
    Invoked as the basis for the entire calculation.
  • domain assumption Warping can be added perturbatively after solving the isotropic model.
    Stated explicitly when moving from analytical to semi-numerical results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5718 in / 1419 out tokens · 52204 ms · 2026-05-18T04:15:25.501344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene, nature438, 197 (2005)

  2. [2]

    A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene, Nature materials6, 183 (2007)

  3. [3]

    Y. Shi, S. Xu, Y. Yang, S. Slizovskiy, S. V. Morozov, S.- K. Son, S. Ozdemir, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, J. Yin,et al., Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhombohedral graphite, Nature584, 210 (2020)

  4. [4]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, J. Sung, J. Wang, T. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Park, and L. Ju, Cor- related insulator and chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 181 (2024)

  5. [5]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus,et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature643, 654 (2025)

  6. [6]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, J. R. Ehrets, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, M. Serbyn,et al., Half-and quarter-metals in rhombohe- dral trilayer graphene, Nature598, 429 (2021)

  7. [7]

    X. Han, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Niu, Z. Qu, Z. Wang, Z. Li, C. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Engineering the band topology in a rhombohedral trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nano Letters24, 6286 (2024)

  8. [8]

    F. R. Geisenhof, F. Winterer, A. M. Seiler, J. Lenz, T. Xu, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, Quantum anoma- lous hall octet driven by orbital magnetism in bilayer graphene, Nature598, 53 (2021)

  9. [9]

    P. A. Pantale´ on, A. Jimeno-Pozo, H. Sainz-Cruz, V. T. Phong, T. Cea, and F. Guinea, Superconductivity and correlated phases in non-twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene, Nature Reviews Physics5, 304 (2023)

  10. [10]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Extended quan- tum anomalous hall states in graphene/hbn moir´ e super- lattices, Nature637, 1090 (2025)

  11. [11]

    H. Zhou, G. Chang, G. Wang, X. Gui, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, Z. Guguchia, S. S. Zhang, T.-R. Chang, H. Lin,et al., Enhanced anomalous hall effect in the magnetic topolog- ical semimetal co 3 sn 2- x in x s 2, Physical Review B 101, 125121 (2020)

  12. [12]

    Zhou, R.-W

    X. Zhou, R.-W. Zhang, X. Yang, X.-P. Li, W. Feng, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Disorder-and topology- enhanced fully spin-polarized currents in nodal chain spin-gapless semimetals, Physical Review Letters129, 097201 (2022)

  13. [13]

    A. M. Seiler, N. Jacobsen, M. Statz, N. Fernandez, F. Falorsi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Dong, L. S. Levitov, and R. T. Weitz, Probing the tunable multi- cone band structure in bernal bilayer graphene, Nature Communications15, 3133 (2024)

  14. [14]

    Y. Choi, Y. Choi, M. Valentini, C. L. Patterson, L. F. Holleis, O. I. Sheekey, H. Stoyanov, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Superconductivity and quantized anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral graphene, Nature , 1 (2025)

  15. [15]

    J. Yang, X. Shi, S. Ye, C. Yoon, Z. Lu, V. Kakani, T. Han, J. Seo, L. Shi, K. Watanabe,et al., Impact of spin–orbit coupling on superconductivity in rhombohe- dral graphene, Nature Materials , 1 (2025)

  16. [16]

    Mu and J

    X. Mu and J. Zhou, Valley-dependent giant orbital mo- ments and transport features in rhombohedral graphene multilayers, Physical Review B111, 165102 (2025)

  17. [17]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

  18. [18]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature598, 434 (2021)

  19. [19]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

  20. [20]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

  21. [21]

    X. Liu, Z. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, O. Vafek, and J. Li, Tuning electron correlation in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene using coulomb screening, Sci- ence371, 1261 (2021)

  22. [22]

    Parra-Mart´ ınez, A

    G. Parra-Mart´ ınez, A. Jimeno-Pozo, V. o. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. Pantale´ on, J. A. Silva-Guill´ en, and F. Guinea, Band renormalization, quarter metals, and chiral superconduc- tivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 136503 (2025)

  23. [23]

    Zhang, Y.-Y

    Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Zhou, S. Zhang, H. Cai, L.-H. Tong, W.-Y. Liao, R.-J. Zou, S.-M. Xue, Y. Tian, T. Chen, et al., Layer-dependent evolution of electronic structures and correlations in rhombohedral multilayer graphene, Nature Nanotechnology20, 222 (2025)

  24. [24]

    Kumar, D

    M. Kumar, D. Waleffe, A. Okounkova, R. Tejani, V. T. Phong, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Lewandowski, J. Folk, and M. Yankowitz, Superconductivity from dual-surface carriers in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18598 (2025)

  25. [25]

    Ghazaryan, T

    A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, E. Berg, and M. Serbyn, Mul- tilayer graphenes as a platform for interaction-driven physics and topological superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104502 (2023)

  26. [26]

    Cao, Rhombohedral graphene goes correlated at four or five layers, nature nanotechnology19, 139 (2024)

    Y. Cao, Rhombohedral graphene goes correlated at four or five layers, nature nanotechnology19, 139 (2024). 9

  27. [27]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Reviews of modern physics82, 1539 (2010)

  28. [28]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. Luttinger, Hall effect in ferromagnet- ics, Physical Review95, 1154 (1954)

  29. [29]

    Jungwirth, Q

    T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. MacDonald, Anomalous hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors, Physical re- view letters88, 207208 (2002)

  30. [30]

    Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

    N. Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

  31. [31]

    Streda, Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15, L717 (1982)

    P. Streda, Theory of quantised hall conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15, L717 (1982)

  32. [32]

    T. S. Nunner, N. Sinitsyn, M. F. Borunda, V. Dugaev, A. Kovalev, A. Abanov, C. Timm, T. Jungwirth, J.- i. Inoue, A. MacDonald,et al., Anomalous hall ef- fect in a two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics76, 235312 (2007)

  33. [33]

    Berger, Influence of spin-orbit interaction on the trans- port processes in ferromagnetic nickel alloys, in the pres- ence of a degeneracy of the 3d band, Physica30, 1141 (1964)

    L. Berger, Influence of spin-orbit interaction on the trans- port processes in ferromagnetic nickel alloys, in the pres- ence of a degeneracy of the 3d band, Physica30, 1141 (1964)

  34. [34]

    Belinicher, E

    V. Belinicher, E. Ivchenko, and B. Sturman, Kinetic theory of the displacement photovoltaic effect in piezo- electrics, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz83, 649 (1982)

  35. [35]

    Sinitsyn, Q

    N. Sinitsyn, Q. Niu, and A. MacDonald, Coordinate shift in the semiclassical boltzmann equation and the anoma- lous hall effect, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 075318 (2006)

  36. [36]

    Smit, The spontaneous hall effect in ferromagnetics i, Physica21, 877 (1955)

    J. Smit, The spontaneous hall effect in ferromagnetics i, Physica21, 877 (1955)

  37. [37]

    Sinitsyn, A

    N. Sinitsyn, A. MacDonald, T. Jungwirth, V. Dugaev, and J. Sinova, Anomalous hall effect in a two-dimensional dirac band: The link between the kubo-streda for- mula and the semiclassical boltzmann equation approach, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 045315 (2007)

  38. [38]

    I. Ado, I. Dmitriev, P. Ostrovsky, and M. Titov, Anoma- lous hall effect with massive dirac fermions, Europhysics Letters111, 37004 (2015)

  39. [39]

    I. Ado, I. Dmitriev, P. Ostrovsky, and M. Titov, Anoma- lous hall effect in a 2d rashba ferromagnet, Physical Re- view Letters117, 046601 (2016)

  40. [40]

    K¨ onig, P

    E. K¨ onig, P. Ostrovsky, M. Dzero, and A. Levchenko, Anomalous hall effect on the surface of topological kondo insulators, Physical Review B94, 041403 (2016)

  41. [41]

    R. M. Lutchyn, P. Nagornykh, and V. M. Yakovenko, Fre- quency and temperature dependence of the anomalous ac hall conductivity in a chiral px+ ipy superconductor with impurities, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80, 104508 (2009)

  42. [42]

    Goryo, Impurity-induced polar kerr effect in a chiral p-wave superconductor, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics78, 060501 (2008)

    J. Goryo, Impurity-induced polar kerr effect in a chiral p-wave superconductor, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics78, 060501 (2008)

  43. [43]

    T. Ando, T. Nakanishi, and R. Saito, Berry’s phase and absence of back scattering in carbon nanotubes, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan67, 2857 (1998)

  44. [44]

    Koshino and E

    M. Koshino and E. McCann, Trigonal warping and berry’s phase nπin abc-stacked multilayer graphene, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80, 165409 (2009)

  45. [45]

    Koshino, Interlayer screening effect in graphene mul- tilayers with aba and abc stacking, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 125304 (2010)

    M. Koshino, Interlayer screening effect in graphene mul- tilayers with aba and abc stacking, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 125304 (2010)

  46. [46]

    Guinea, A

    F. Guinea, A. Castro Neto, and N. Peres, Electronic states and landau levels in graphene stacks, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 245426 (2006)

  47. [47]

    Lu, H.-C

    C.-L. Lu, H.-C. Lin, C.-C. Hwang, J. Wang, M.-F. Lin, and C.-P. Chang, Absorption spectra of trilayer rhombo- hedral graphite, Applied physics letters89(2006)

  48. [48]

    Sinitsyn, J

    N. Sinitsyn, J. Hill, H. Min, J. Sinova, and A. Mac- Donald, Charge and spin hall conductivity in metallic graphene, Physical review letters97, 106804 (2006)

  49. [49]

    Mitra, R

    P. Mitra, R. Misra, A. Hebard, K. Muttalib, and P. W¨ olfle, Weak-localization correction to the anomalous hall effect in polycrystalline fe films, Physical review let- ters99, 046804 (2007)

  50. [50]

    K¨ onig, P

    E. K¨ onig, P. Ostrovsky, I. Protopopov, I. Gornyi, I. Bur- mistrov, and A. Mirlin, Half-integer quantum hall effect of disordered dirac fermions at a topological insulator surface, Physical Review B90, 165435 (2014)

  51. [51]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number 1/2, Physical Review D13, 3398 (1976)

  52. [52]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, S. Li, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Disorder- induced nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try, Nature Communications10, 3047 (2019)

  53. [53]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unifying semiclassics and quantum perturbation theory at nonlinear order, Sci- Post Phys.14, 082 (2023)

  54. [54]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, General nonlinear hall current in magnetic insulators beyond the quantum anomalous hall effect, Nature communications14, 3053 (2023)

  55. [55]

    Kaplan, K

    D. Kaplan, K. P. Lucht, P. A. Volkov, and J. H. Pix- ley, Quantum geometric photocurrents of quasiparti- cles in superconductors (2025), arXiv:2502.12265 [cond- mat.supr-con]

  56. [56]

    I. Ado, I. Dmitriev, P. Ostrovsky, and M. Titov, On- line supplemental material, anomalous hall effect in 2d rashba ferromagnet, Physical Review Letters117, 046601 (2016). 10 Appendix A: The low-energy Hamiltonian In this appendix we provide details in the derivation of Eq. (1) of the main text, i.e. an effective two-component Hamiltonian that describes h...

  57. [57]

    First, the experimental article [18] quotes a mean free pathl∼1µm (it was deduced from a Drude expression forR xx) at densityn e ≈2⋅1012 cm−2and the sample size L∼2.5µm

    Importance of impurities In this section, we discuss when impurities are impor- tant in experimental samples. First, the experimental article [18] quotes a mean free pathl∼1µm (it was deduced from a Drude expression forR xx) at densityn e ≈2⋅1012 cm−2and the sample size L∼2.5µm. Alternatively, as quantum oscillations [6] become visible for a magnetic fiel...

  58. [58]

    Real space clean Green’s function In this appendix we present details in the derivation of Eq. (10). We adopt the conventionϵ≡ϵ F >0 throughout the appendices to streamline the derivations. We start from the definition of Green’s function: GR/A 0 (ϵ,p)=[ϵ±i0−H 0]−1,(B1) GR/A 0 (ϵ,r)=[ϵ+ ⃗d(−i∇)]In(r), where In(r)= 2πnρn(ϵ) ϵ ∫ d¯pxd¯py (2π) 2 ei¯pxp0r 1±i...

  59. [59]

    Self-consistent Born approximation In this appendix we provide details in the derivation of Eq. (6). The self-consistent Born approximation leads to a self-energy: Σ= ϵ nρn(ϵ) α⋅ ∫ d2p (2π) 2 ϵ+mσ z+υσ xpn cos(nθ)+υσ ypn sin(nθ) υ2p2n 0 −υ2p2n±iΓ(ϵ+m) = −πiα(ϵ+mσz) 2n =−i(Γ+Γ zσz)(B4) Here we only kept the imaginary part of the self-energy, the real part ...

  60. [60]

    Intrinsic contribution for isotropic model In this appendix, we show details for the intrinsic con- tribution, Eq. (5), which in the Kubo-Streda approach is given by σint xy = e2 h ∫ dp2 (2π) 2 Tr⎛ ⎝jx(p)G R p jy(p)G A p ⎞ ⎠.(B5) After taking the trace we can get σint xy = e2 h ∫ ∞ 0 pdp 2π ∫ 2π 0 dθ 2π υ2n2(4ϵmi(i0)p 2n−2+iυ 2p4n−2(e−2iθ−e2iθ)) (υ2p2n 0 ...

  61. [61]

    (7) of the main text

    Vertex correction In this appendix, we calculate a single-impurity vertex correction, which is given by Eq. (7) of the main text. Let us consider the first order correction: δjx/y=α ϵ nρn(ϵ) ∫ d2p (2π) 2 GA p jx/yGR p ∝ ∫ d2p (2π) 2(a(∣⃗p∣2)+b(∣⃗p∣2)P n+c(∣⃗p∣2) ¯P n)P n−1+h.c.=0. (B7) The matrix-valued isotropic functions a(∣⃗p∣2), b(∣⃗p∣2), c(∣⃗p∣2)may ...

  62. [62]

    (13a), (13b) of the main text

    Diffractive skew-scattering In this appendix we provide calculations about diffrac- tive skew-scattering contribution from X and Ψ diagram Eq. (13a), (13b) of the main text. σX xy = e2 h ⎛ ⎝ ϵ nρn(ϵ) α⎞ ⎠ 2 ∫{pi} Tr[GA p1 jx(p1)GR p1 GR p3 GR p2 jy(p2)GA p2 GA p4](2π)2δ(p 1+p 2−p3−p4).(B10) We rewrite the average Green’s function as GR p =N(p)G R p , N(p)...

  63. [63]

    Calculation of integral over Bessel functions In this section, we present calculations of the Bessel- function integrals appearing in (13a)–(13b) and obtain asymptotic expressions in the limitn→∞. We need the following integrals: In10n = ∫ ∞ 0 dxJnJ1J0 ˜Yn,(B11a) Inn10 = ∫ ∞ 0 dxJ2 nJ1 ˜Y0,(B11b) Inn01 = ∫ ∞ 0 dxJ2 nJ0 ˜Y1,(B11c) In±00= ∫ ∞ 0 dxJn(Jn−1−Jn...

  64. [64]

    (2b), of the disorder potential Eq

    Case of sparse and strong impurities In this appendix we deduce the contribution of the higher-order moment, Eq. (2b), of the disorder potential Eq. (16). The contribution from ”Mercedes star” diagram: σMC xy =σ Y xy+σ Y xy = e2 h (βυ 3p3n−4 0 )⋅ ∫{pi} ⎛ ⎝Tr[GA p1 jx(p1)GR p1 GR p3 GR p2 jy(p2)GA p2]+ Tr[GA p1 jx(p1)GR p1 GR p2 jy(p2)GA p2 GA p3]⎞ ⎠. This...

  65. [65]

    Firstly, let us define the Fermi momentum

    Necessary designations In this section, we introduce all the necessary defini- tions which we use in this paper for the warped model, see Eqs.(17)-(23). Firstly, let us define the Fermi momentum. Using the notationϵ 2−m2 =v 2p2n 0 we find ξ2 =m 2+v 2p2n+2vwp 2n−3cos(3ϕ)+w 2p2n−6.(C1) Solvingξ=ϵusing ¯p=p/p 0,˜w=w/vp 3 0 leads to the con- dition 1=¯p2n+˜w¯...

  66. [66]

    (20a), (25), (27), (29) from the main text

    Trilayer graphene in warped model In this section, we provide calculations for trilayer graphene, i.e.n=3 in warped case, for Eqs. (20a), (25), (27), (29) from the main text. We start from the effective HamiltonianH (w) 3 : H (w) 3 = ⃗d(p)⋅⃗σ=( m d − d+ −m),(C5) withd −=d x−iy(p)=vP 3+w;d z =m. a. Intrinsic contribution Firstly, we consider intrinsic cont...

  67. [67]

    Tetralayer graphene in warped model In this section we provide calculations for tetralayer graphene, i.e.n=4 in the warped case, i.e. Eqs. (20b), (25), (28), (29) from the main text. We do the similar steps as for the trilayer case. We start from the effective HamiltonianH (w) 4 : H (w) 4 = ⃗d(p)⋅⃗σ=( m d − d+ −m),(C20) withd −=d † + =d x−iy(p)=vP 4+wP;d ...