pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.23555 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Two topological phases in exchange alternating spin-1 nanographene chains

Jo\~ao C. G. Henriques , Yelko del Castillo , Ricardo Segundo , Jan Phillips , Joaqu\'in Fern\'andez-Rossier This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nanographenesspin-1 chainstopological phasesHaldane phasebiquadratic exchangeDMRGedge statesmolecular magnets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-1 nanographenes realize two distinct topological phases in bond-alternating chains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that spin-1 nanographenes provide a way to build bond-alternating chains that can be tuned into either the Haldane topological phase or a dimerized phase that leaves unpaired spin-1 at the edges. This is controlled by the biquadratic exchange, whose effect on the phase boundary is calculated with DMRG. Two concrete molecular examples are given that should fall into each phase, and a method to tell them apart experimentally is described.

Core claim

Spin-1 nanographenes can be used to explore bond-alternating chains both in the Haldane phase and beyond it, in a dimerized phase with emergent edge spin-1. The phase transition boundary is determined by biquadratic exchange, which is known to be large in these systems. Combining calculations, two realistic candidates are the recently synthesized extended Clar's goblet and a passivated [4]-triangulene, distinguishable by inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

The bond-alternating spin-1 Heisenberg chain model with bilinear and biquadratic exchange terms, studied through density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations to determine the phases and boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The biquadratic exchange is large enough in the chosen nanographene structures to correctly place them in the targeted phases according to the DMRG phase diagram.

What would settle it

If the inelastic electron tunneling spectrum of the extended Clar's goblet molecule does not match the predicted Haldane phase but instead shows dimerized features with edge spins, the claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23555 by Jan Phillips, Jo\~ao C. G. Henriques, Joaqu\'in Fern\'andez-Rossier, Ricardo Segundo, Yelko del Castillo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic nanographenes are emerging as versatile building blocks for artificial spin lattices, enabling the exploration of flagship one-dimensional quantum-magnetism models with unprecedented control. The spin-1 Heisenberg model, including bilinear and biquadratic exchange, was first realized using [3]-triangulenes, revealing the Haldane phase. More recently, Clar's goblets enabled the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model with exchange alternation, uncovering additional topological phases. Here we show that spin-1 nanographenes can be used to explore bond-alternating chains both in the Haldane phase and beyond it, in a dimerized phase with emergent edge spin-1. We use density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) to analyze how biquadratic exchange, which is known to be large in spin-1 nanographenes, determines the phase transition boundary. Combining multiconfigurational and first-principles calculations, we identify two realistic candidates to realize these two different phases: the recently synthesized extended Clar's goblet and a passivated [4]-triangulene. We demonstrate how to distinguish these phases experimentally using inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy, paving the way for their observation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that spin-1 nanographenes enable realization of bond-alternating chains in both the Haldane phase and a dimerized phase with emergent edge spin-1 states. DMRG is used to determine how biquadratic exchange controls the phase boundary in the bilinear-biquadratic model. Multiconfigurational and first-principles calculations identify the extended Clar's goblet and a passivated [4]-triangulene as realistic candidates for the two phases, which are proposed to be distinguishable via inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy.

Significance. If the phase assignments are robust, the work extends prior nanographene realizations of the Haldane phase and spin-1/2 alternating chains by providing concrete molecular candidates for two distinct topological regimes in the same spin-1 setting. The explicit mapping from ab initio parameters to the DMRG phase diagram and the proposed IETS signatures constitute a falsifiable prediction that could guide experiments in artificial spin lattices.

major comments (2)
  1. [candidate identification and parameter extraction] The central claim that the extended Clar's goblet and passivated [4]-triangulene lie on opposite sides of the phase boundary (abstract and candidate-selection section) rests on the extracted biquadratic exchange values. No sensitivity analysis or error propagation is reported for variations in active-space choice, basis-set incompleteness, or neglected longer-range interactions, even though the DMRG boundary is known to be sensitive to the J2/J1 ratio.
  2. [DMRG analysis] In the DMRG phase diagram (model Hamiltonian and numerical results section), the transition line separating the Haldane and dimerized phases is presented without accompanying uncertainty bands derived from the ab initio parameter uncertainties. A modest systematic shift in the computed biquadratic term could therefore reverse the phase assignment for one or both proposed molecules.
minor comments (2)
  1. [model section] The notation for the alternating exchange parameters (J1, J2) and the biquadratic term should be made fully consistent between the model Hamiltonian and the ab initio extraction tables.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the phase diagram and IETS spectra would benefit from explicit labels indicating which candidate molecule corresponds to each phase.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the robustness of the phase assignments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [candidate identification and parameter extraction] The central claim that the extended Clar's goblet and passivated [4]-triangulene lie on opposite sides of the phase boundary (abstract and candidate-selection section) rests on the extracted biquadratic exchange values. No sensitivity analysis or error propagation is reported for variations in active-space choice, basis-set incompleteness, or neglected longer-range interactions, even though the DMRG boundary is known to be sensitive to the J2/J1 ratio.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not include an explicit sensitivity analysis for the ab initio parameters. The active space and basis sets were selected following standard protocols for nanographene systems to capture the dominant pi-electron physics, and the resulting J2/J1 ratios locate both molecules well away from the DMRG phase boundary. To strengthen the presentation, we will add a dedicated sensitivity subsection in the revised manuscript that varies the active-space size, examines basis-set effects, and estimates the impact of neglected longer-range couplings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [DMRG analysis] In the DMRG phase diagram (model Hamiltonian and numerical results section), the transition line separating the Haldane and dimerized phases is presented without accompanying uncertainty bands derived from the ab initio parameter uncertainties. A modest systematic shift in the computed biquadratic term could therefore reverse the phase assignment for one or both proposed molecules.

    Authors: The DMRG calculations map the phase boundary as a function of the biquadratic-to-bilinear ratio using established methods for the bilinear-biquadratic chain. While uncertainty bands were not shown in the submitted version, the extracted parameters for the two candidate molecules lie sufficiently far from the critical ratio that moderate variations do not alter the phase assignments. In the revision we will overlay uncertainty bands on the phase diagram that reflect the range of ab initio parameters obtained from our multiconfigurational calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation combines independent DMRG phase mapping with new first-principles parameter extraction

full rationale

The paper maps the phase boundary of the spin-1 bilinear-biquadratic chain via DMRG as a function of the biquadratic strength (a tunable parameter in the model), then extracts effective exchange parameters for the two candidate molecules using separate multiconfigurational and first-principles calculations. These computations are not fitted to the target phase assignments, nor do they reduce by definition or self-citation to the final claims. Prior literature is cited only for context on the magnitude of biquadratic exchange in related systems and does not serve as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the present results. The overall chain remains self-contained and externally falsifiable through the ab initio values and DMRG numerics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard spin-1 Heisenberg Hamiltonian with bilinear and biquadratic terms, the assumption that DMRG accurately captures the phase diagram for the relevant parameter range, and the transferability of exchange parameters from earlier nanographene studies to the new molecular candidates.

free parameters (1)
  • biquadratic exchange strength J2
    Taken from prior literature on spin-1 nanographenes and used to locate the phase boundary; its precise value determines which candidate sits in which phase.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The spin-1 Heisenberg model with bilinear and biquadratic exchange accurately describes the low-energy physics of the nanographene building blocks.
    Invoked when mapping the molecular candidates onto the phase diagram.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1503 out tokens · 24504 ms · 2026-05-18T03:08:54.623882+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    (see Supplementary Fig. 1). These different decay rates lead to the formation of a hump in the excitation gap vsdplots in thed <0 region, which serves as the fingerprint of the phase transition, and yields the value ford c when extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit. An example of this is depicted forβ 1 = 0 andβ 2 = 0 in Supplementary Fig. 2. Even thoug...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Nonetheless, we can still clearly see, for both cases, the edge-nature of this excitation by tracking the conductance at zero bias along all sites, as we depict in Fig

    with chains with less than 8 units. Nonetheless, we can still clearly see, for both cases, the edge-nature of this excitation by tracking the conductance at zero bias along all sites, as we depict in Fig. 4g. In Fig. 4c and d we show the simulation for the chains made with passivated [4]-triangulenes (using the exchange values of the Type-I and -II dimers...

    work page 2045

  3. [3]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Physics-uspekhi44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Kitaev, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006)

    A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics115, 477 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Con- densed Matter Physics and Exactly Soluble Models: Se- lecta of Elliott H. Lieb , 249 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valent´ ı, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Hensgens, T

    T. Hensgens, T. Fujita, L. Janssen, X. Li, C. Van Diepen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, S. Das Sarma, and L. M. Vandersypen, Nature548, 70 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. T¨ ureci, and J. Koch, Nature Physics 8, 292 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    A. A. Khajetoorians, D. Wegner, A. F. Otte, and I. Swart, Nature Reviews Physics1, 703 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    H. C. Longuet-Higgins, Journal of Chemical Physics18, 265 (1950)

    work page 1950

  13. [13]

    A. A. Ovchinnikov, Theoretica chimica acta47, 297 (1978)

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    Rajca, Chemical reviews94, 871 (1994)

    A. Rajca, Chemical reviews94, 871 (1994)

    work page 1994

  15. [15]

    Fern´ andez-Rossier and J

    J. Fern´ andez-Rossier and J. J. Palacios, Physical Review Letters99, 177204 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    O. V. Yazyev, Reports on Progress in Physics73, 056501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    E. H. Lieb, Physical review letters62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Pavliˇ cek, A

    N. Pavliˇ cek, A. Mistry, Z. Majzik, N. Moll, G. Meyer, D. J. Fox, and L. Gross, Nature nanotechnology12, 308 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, J. Liu, R. Berger, O. Groning, C. A. Pignedoli, K. M¨ ullen, R. Fasel, X. Feng,et al., Journal of the American Chemical So- ciety141, 10621 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    J. Su, M. Telychko, S. Song, and J. Lu, Angewandte Chemie International Edition59, 7658 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    J. Li, S. Sanz, J. Castro-Esteban, M. Vilas-Varela, N. Friedrich, T. Frederiksen, D. Pe˜ na, and J. I. Pascual, Physical Review Letters124, 177201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Turco, A

    E. Turco, A. Bernhardt, N. Krane, L. Valenta, R. Fasel, M. Juri ’ c v ek, and P. Ruffieux, JACS Au3, 1358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    J. Su, M. Telychko, P. Hu, G. Macam, P. Mutombo, H. Zhang, Y. Bao, F. Cheng, Z.-Q. Huang, Z. Qiu, S. J. Tan, H. Lin, P. Jelinek, F.-C. Chuang, J. Wu, and J. Lu, Science advances5, eaav7717 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Mishra, K

    S. Mishra, K. Xu, K. Eimre, H. Komber, J. Ma, C. A. Pignedoli, R. Fasel, X. Feng, and P. Ruffieux, Nanoscale 13, 1624 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Mistry, B

    A. Mistry, B. Moreton, B. Schuler, F. Mohn, G. Meyer, L. Gross, A. Williams, P. Scott, G. Costantini, and D. J. Fox, Chemistry–A European Journal21, 2011 (2015)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Clar and C

    E. Clar and C. Mackay, Tetrahedron28, 6041 (1972)

    work page 1972

  27. [27]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, S. Kezilebieke, R. Berger, O. Gr¨ oning, C. A. Pignedoli, K. M¨ ullen, P. Liljeroth, P. Ruffieux, X. Feng, and R. Fasel, Nature nanotechnol- ogy15, 22 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    S. Song, A. Pinar Sol´ e, A. Matˇ ej, G. Li, O. Stetsovych, D. Soler, H. Yang, M. Telychko, J. Li, M. Kumar, Q. Chen, S. Edalatmanesh, J. Brabec, L. Veis, J. Wu, 10 P. Jelinek, and J. Lu, Nature Chemistry16, 938 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    D.-J. Choi, N. Lorente, J. Wiebe, K. Von Bergmann, A. F. Otte, and A. J. Heinrich, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 041001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Mishra, G

    S. Mishra, G. Catarina, F. Wu, R. Ortiz, D. Jacob, K. Eimre, J. Ma, C. A. Pignedoli, X. Feng, P. Ruffieux, et al., Nature598, 287 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    C. Zhao, G. Catarina, J.-J. Zhang, J. C. Henriques, L. Yang, J. Ma, X. Feng, O. Gr¨ oning, P. Ruffieux, J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, and R. Fasel, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Hida, Physical Review B45, 2207 (1992)

    K. Hida, Physical Review B45, 2207 (1992)

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    H. Wang, P. Fan, J. Chen, L. Jiang, H.-J. Gao, J. L. Lado, and K. Yang, Nature Nanotechnology , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Jacob and J

    D. Jacob and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review B 106, 205405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    C. Zhao, L. Yang, J. C. Henriques, M. Ferri-Cort´ es, G. Catarina, C. A. Pignedoli, J. Ma, X. Feng, P. Ruffieux, J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, and R. Fasel, Nature Materials , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Yuan, X.-Y

    Z. Yuan, X.-Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang, X. Qian, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Liu, X. Liu, D. Guan, Y. Li, H. Zheng, C. Liu, L. Jia, Jinfeng, M. Qin, Q. Liu, Pei-Nian, D.-Y. Li, and S. Wang, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    X. Su, Z. Ding, Y. Hong, N. Ke, K. Yan, C. Li, Y.-F. Jiang, and P. Yu, Nature Synthesis , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    K. Sun, N. Cao, O. J. Silveira, A. O. Fumega, F. Hanin- dita, S. Ito, J. L. Lado, P. Liljeroth, A. S. Foster, and S. Kawai, Science Advances11, eads1641 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Kato and A

    Y. Kato and A. Tanaka, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan63, 1277 (1994)

    work page 1994

  40. [40]

    Totsuka, Y

    K. Totsuka, Y. Nishiyama, N. Hatano, and M. Suzuki, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter7, 4895 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Kitazawa, K

    A. Kitazawa, K. Nomura, and K. Okamoto, Physical re- view letters76, 4038 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    J. C. Henriques and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Re- view B108, 155423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Mishra, M

    S. Mishra, M. Vilas-Varela, I. Ronˇ cevi´ c, F. Paschke, F. Albrecht, L. Gross, and D. Pe˜ na, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03289 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    E. Li, M. Kumar, X. Peng, T. Shen, D. Soler-Polo, Y. Wang, Y. Teng, H. Zhang, S. Song, J. Wu, P. Jelinek, and J. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05181 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Sci- Post Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022), publisher: SciPost

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Kennedy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2, 5737 (1990)

    T. Kennedy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2, 5737 (1990)

    work page 1990

  47. [47]

    J. Li, S. Sanz, M. Corso, D. J. Choi, D. Pe˜ na, T. Fred- eriksen, and J. I. Pascual, Nature communications10, 200 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    C. Zhao, Q. Huang, L. Valenta, K. Eimre, L. Yang, A. V. Yakutovich, W. Xu, J. Ma, X. Feng, M. Jur´ ıˇ cek, and M. Jur´ ıˇ cek, Physical review letters132, 046201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Ortiz, R

    R. Ortiz, R. A. Boto, N. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ınez, J. C. Sancho- Garc´ ıa, M. Melle-Franco, and J. Ferna ’ ndez-Rossier, Nano Letters19, 5991 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Catarina, J

    G. Catarina, J. C. Henriques, A. Molina-S´ anchez, A. T. Costa, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review Re- search5, 043226 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. K¨ u ...

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf ‘a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino, A. Fer- retti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 154105 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005082

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0005082 2020

  54. [54]

    D. R. Hamann, M. Schl¨ uter, and C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1494 (1979)

    work page 1979

  55. [55]

    Troullier and J

    N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B43, 1993 (1991)

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    van Setten, M

    M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Ver- straete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, Computer Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    K. F. Garrity, J. W. Bennett, K. M. Rabe, and D. Van- derbilt, Computational Materials Science81, 446 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Lejaeghere, G

    K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Bj¨ orkman, P. Blaha, S. Bl¨ ugel, V. Blum, D. Caliste, I. E. Castelli, S. J. Clark, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, T. Deutsch, J. K. Dewhurst, I. D. Marco, C. Draxl, M. Du lak, O. Eriksson, J. A. Flores-Livas, K. F. Gar- rity, L. Genovese, P. Giannozzi, M. Giantomassi, S. Goedecker, X. Gonze, O. Gr aan ”as, E. K. U. Gross, ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aad3000 2016

  60. [60]

    Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review Letters102, 256802 (2009)

    J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review Letters102, 256802 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Ternes, New Journal of Physics17, 063016 (2015)

    M. Ternes, New Journal of Physics17, 063016 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, SciPost Phys.2, 003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Hagiwara, Y

    M. Hagiwara, Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, M. Kohno, 11 H. Nakano, R. Sato, and M. Takahashi, Physical review letters80, 1312 (1998)

    work page 1998

  64. [64]

    Narumi, M

    Y. Narumi, M. Hagiwara, M. Kohno, and K. Kindo, Physical review letters86, 324 (2001)

    work page 2001

  65. [65]

    Narumi, K

    Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, M. Hagiwara, H. Nakano, A. Kawaguchi, K. Okunishi, and M. Kohno, Physical Re- view B69, 174405 (2004)

    work page 2004

  66. [66]

    Zheludev, T

    A. Zheludev, T. Masuda, B. Sales, D. Mandrus, T. Pa- penbrock, T. Barnes, and S. Park, Physical Review B69, 144417 (2004)

    work page 2004

  67. [67]

    Hagiwara, L

    M. Hagiwara, L. Regnault, A. Zheludev, A. Stunault, N. Metoki, T. Suzuki, S. Suga, K. Kakurai, Y. Koike, P. Vorderwisch, and J.-H. Chung, Physical review letters 94, 177202 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Hagiwara, H

    M. Hagiwara, H. Tsujii, C. Rotundu, B. Andraka, Y. Takano, N. Tateiwa, . f. T. Kobayashi, T. Suzuki, and S. Suga, Physical review letters96, 147203 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Madhumathy, K

    R. Madhumathy, K. Saranya, K. Moovendaran, K. Ramesh Babu, A. Rana, K.-Y. Choi, H.-S. Kim, W.-T. Chen, M. Ponmurugan, R. Sankar, and I. Pan- neer Muthuselvam, Physical Review B107, 214406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    J. L. Lado and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Physical Review Letters113, 027203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    V.-T. Tran, J. Saint-Martin, P. Dollfus, and S. Volz, AIP Advances7(2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Cusinato, S

    L. Cusinato, S. Evangelisti, T. Leininger, and A. Monari, Advances in Condensed Matter Physics2018, 9097045 (2018)

    work page 2018