Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Identifying geometric third-order nonlinear transport in disordered materials

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a scaling law: third-order nonlinear Hall conductivity is a polynomial in longitudinal conductivity whose weight ratios fingerprint each of twenty transport mechanisms.

desk verdict Useful and usable framework for third-order nonlinear transport fingerprinting; load-bearing disorder-scaling assumption is imported rather than derived, so treat the fingerprints as tools pending derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.24239 v2 pith:OT6BHLYN submitted 2025-10-28 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhen-Hao Gong , Zhi-Hao Wei , Hai-Zhou Lu , X. C. Xie This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords third-ordernonlineartransportHalleffectquantummetricquadrupoleBerrycurvaturedisorderscatteringsidejumpskewscalinglaw
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Third-order nonlinear transport—a voltage at three times the drive frequency that grows with the cube of the current—is a promising window into the quantum geometry of Bloch bands, but in real materials impurity scattering generates competing signals of its own. This paper tries to settle which mechanism is actually responsible in a given sample. It does so by enumerating all twenty mechanisms at third order on equal footing, then deriving a scaling law that expresses the third-order nonlinear Hall conductivity as a polynomial of degree six in the linear longitudinal conductivity, χ_{y;xxx} = Σ_{n=0}^6 C_n σ_xx^n. Each mechanism leaves a characteristic set of weight ratios among C_0...C_6, and twelve of the twenty mechanisms can be unambiguously identified when they dominate. The authors apply this to published data, identifying the quantum metric quadrupole in MoTe2, Drude-plus-quantum-metric quadrupole in WTe2 and FeSn, and a scattering-independent third-order intrinsic mechanism below 100 K in Fe5GeTe2.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scaling law Eq. (2), which turns the entire mechanism taxonomy into seven fitted numbers C_0...C_6. It works because both sides are functions of the same disorder: σ_xx ∝ τ in the semiclassical regime, so a mechanism whose conductivity scales as τ^a (and possibly with powers of disorder correlation functions) maps onto a polynomial in σ_xx. The disorder-correlation input ⟨V V⟩ ∼ ρ_xx − ρ_xx0 converts the scattering-matrix-element dependence into additional σ_xx factors. Table I is the resulting fingerprint dictionary: each row is a seven-term weight ratio, and 12 of the 20 rows are unique.

What would settle it

Measure χ_{y;xxx}(σ_xx) in a single material across a temperature range wide enough that σ_xx deviates from σ_xx0 by more than a factor of two, and check whether the fitted polynomial still matches a Table I row with the same weight ratios at all points. A complementary numerical check would compute the 20 mechanism conductivities in a controlled disorder model and compare the extracted weight ratios to the table.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the scaling law of Eq. (2), χ_{y;xxx} = Σ_{n=0}^6 C_n σ_xx^n, together with the assignment of weight ratios to each of twenty mechanisms. The derivation starts from the Boltzmann equation, expands both the velocity and the non-equilibrium distribution in powers of the electric field, and identifies all combinations that survive at cubic order. The weights follow from counting powers of scattering time τ and from the disorder-correlation scaling ⟨V_ab V_ba⟩ ∼ ρ_xx − ρ_xx0. The paper claims this makes the mechanisms identifiable in experiment: twelve have unique fingerprints, while eight fall into two-fold degenerate pairs. The protocol also uses magnetic point group s

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that for every mechanism the disorder correlation functions can be written as powers of ρ_xx − ρ_xx0, and that σ_xx stays close to σ_xx0; if either fails, the polynomial weight ratios in Table I no longer correspond to the mechanisms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A simple polynomial fit of χ_{y;xxx} versus σ_xx can identify the dominant mechanism in a given material, as demonstrated for MoTe2, WTe2, FeSn, and Fe5GeTe2.
  • Because the weights distinguish T-even from T-odd mechanisms, the method can track magnetic order through the onset of a scattering-independent contribution, as in Fe5GeTe2 below 100 K.
  • The construction generalizes to arbitrary orders of nonlinear transport, so analogous scaling polynomials could fingerprint mechanisms in higher-harmonic measurements.
  • Any experiment that already measures third-harmonic transverse voltage and linear longitudinal conductivity as functions of temperature can run the protocol without additional inputs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The simplified weight ratios in Table I assume σ_xx ≈ σ_xx0; in datasets where σ_xx changes substantially with temperature, fits should be compared against the full expanded polynomials of Eq. (B6) rather than the simplified ratios.
  • Degenerate pairs (for example, second-order side-jump versus mixed Berry-curvature-plus-skew-scattering) cannot be separated by σ-dependence alone; frequency-dependent, gate-tuned, or sample-dependent measurements would be natural ways to break the degeneracy.
  • If the disorder-correlation scaling is sample-universal, the same material with different impurity concentrations should yield the same C_n ratios, giving a cross-sample test of the method.
  • The same scaling-law strategy could be applied to longitudinal third-order responses or to three-dimensional materials, and combined with ab initio estimates of quantum geometric tensors to predict the ratios quantitatively.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Boltzmann-equation framework for third-order nonlinear transport in disordered materials. It enumerates 20 mechanisms arising from combinations of the velocity (group, Berry-curvature, quantum-metric, side-jump, and third-order-intrinsic terms) with electric-field corrections to the distribution function. The central proposal is a scaling law, Eq. (2): χ_{y;xxx} = Σ_{n=0}^6 C_n σ_xx^n, with mechanism-characteristic weight ratios summarized in Table I. The authors apply this scaling law to published data and assign dominant mechanisms: MoTe2 to QMQ+BSJ, WTe2 and FeSn to Drude+QMQ, and Fe5GeTe2 to TOI below 100 K with 2SJ/BSK above 100 K.

Significance. If the central fingerprint construction is valid, the paper would provide a broadly useful protocol for extracting geometric and disorder mechanisms from third-order nonlinear Hall measurements, and the explicit enumeration of 20 mechanisms is a useful contribution. Strengths include the explicit formulas in Appendix A, the concrete data-analysis procedure, and the breadth of experimental applications. However, the load-bearing step—the conversion of τ-power counting into σ_xx-polynomial weights—rests on an empirical disorder-correlation scaling imported from the anomalous Hall literature and on an approximation that is not quantitatively controlled. The significance is therefore conditional on that step being justified or verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B4)] The central identification of Table I uses ⟨V_{ll'}V_{l'l}⟩ ∼ n_i V_0^2 ∼ σ_xx^{-1} − σ_xx0^{-1} and analogous three-event correlation relations. This scaling is imported from anomalous Hall multivariable scaling (Ref. [57]) and applied uniformly to all 20 mechanisms, including mixed geometric-disorder terms. The manuscript itself describes the relation as approximate/related, but the claimed 12 unambiguous identifications and the experimental assignments in Fig. 3 depend on this functional form. If the correct scaling differs—e.g., for static impurities, for side-jump versus skew-scattering correlations, or for different disorder models—every weight ratio in Table I changes and the fingerprinting protocol loses its basis. Please provide a derivation or a concrete model test of Eq. (B4) for the mechanism classes considered, or explicitly restrict the fingerprints to regimes where the sca
  2. [§3, after Eq. (B6)] The constant integer weights in Table I are obtained under the approximation σ_xx/σ_xx0 ≈ 1. However, the fits in Fig. 3 use data over ranges where σ_xx/σ_xx0 is not close to unity (e.g., Fe5GeTe2 with σ up to about 1.6 σ_xx0), and the fitting formulas actually employed, such as C_BSJ(σ_xx^2/σ_xx0^2 − σ_xx/σ_xx0), explicitly retain σ_xx0. Thus the weight ratios are not constant over the measured range. The paper should quantify the error introduced by using the asymptotic weights for mechanism identification, or present the fingerprint table in terms of σ_xx/σ_xx0-dependent expressions rather than fixed integer ratios.
  3. [Experimental applications, Fig. 3] The validation loop is partly circular: the scaling law is derived from a specific τ-counting-plus-correlation model, and the same model is then used to fit experimental χ_{y;xxx}(σ_xx) curves and to identify the dominant mechanism. Agreement between fit and data is therefore a consistency check of the model against its own templates, not an independent test. The reported confidence intervals and coefficients of determination do not address whether a different correlation scaling or a different mechanism set could produce equally good fits. Please either reframe the experimental conclusions as consistency checks, or add a discriminating test—e.g., a predicted temperature dependence, a sign constraint, or an out-of-sample prediction—that could falsify the assigned mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1)] The symbol G_E appears in the velocity expression but is not defined in the main text. Please define it (presumably related to the Berry connection polarizability tensor) or use a more transparent notation.
  2. [Fig. 2] The symbols for the mechanisms are difficult to decode from the figure alone, and the mapping between symbols and row labels in Table I is not explicit. Adding a legend or matching labels would improve usability.
  3. [Table I] Several rows in the table appear to have missing or overlapping mechanism labels in the displayed text; please ensure each row is clearly paired with its mechanism symbol in the final typeset version.
  4. [§4] The main text cites confidence intervals and coefficients of determination but does not report numerical values. Please include the quantitative fit-quality measures (or a summary table) in the main text or clearly point to the corresponding Supplemental section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling-law fingerprints are model predictions derived from a Boltzmann mechanism count plus an imported empirical correlation scaling, and the experimental applications are fits to those pre-defined templates, not constructions from the fitted data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is as follows: Appendix A obtains 20 mechanisms from the Boltzmann equation; Appendix B converts each mechanism's known dependence on τ and on impurity-correlations into a polynomial in σ_xx using two inputs: (B1) σ_xx ∝ τ and (B4) ⟨V V⟩ ∼ n_i V_0^2 ∼ σ_xx^{-1}−σ_xx0^{-1}, the latter taken from Ref. [57] (Hou et al., an external group). Table I is then obtained by algebraically substituting (B4) into the τ/correlation power counts of (B5) and expanding, e.g. the skew-scattering row is the expansion of σ_xx^6(σ_xx^{-1}−σ_xx0^{-1})^6. This is template generation from theory plus an external empirical input; it does not use the experimental χ_y;xxx(σ_xx) data that are later fitted. The applications in Fig. 3 compare published data against these fixed functional forms; the fitted parameters are the amplitudes C_n, not the weight ratios themselves. Thus the mechanism identification is a conventional hypothesis test rather than a case of 'fitted input called prediction': the predicted shapes precede the fits. The geometric rows (TOI, QMQ, BCQ) do reduce to the known χ ∝ τ^0, τ, τ^2 scalings restated via σ ∝ τ as σ^0, σ^1, σ^2, but this is a legitimate translation rather than a circular reduction because the linear σ−τ relation is an independent semiclassical input and the paper's claimed novelty includes the disorder and mixed-mechanism rows, which are not contained in the known geometric results. The main fragility — the dependence of every disorder-row weight on the imported empirical relation (B4) and the approximation σ_xx/σ_xx0 ≈ 1 stated after Eq. (B6) — is an acknowledged validity caveat, not a self-referential step: the paper explicitly says 'approximately' and 'under this approximation'. No load-bearing self-citation or author-imported uniqueness theorem is used. Therefore no listed circularity pattern is exhibited, and the honest finding is score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The paper's contribution rests on two fitted objects — the C_n coefficients and the σ_xx0 reference — plus a chain of modeling assumptions: Boltzmann kinetics, σ∝τ, and the imported ⟨VV⟩∝ρ−ρ_0 scaling. The most fragile item is the last, since all fingerprints in Table I inherit it.

free parameters (2)
  • Polynomial coefficients C_n (n=0..6) = MoTe2: C_BSJ ≈ 2.15×10^4, C_QMQ ≈ 1.75×10^4; WTe2: C_Drude ≈ 9.60×10^4, C_QMQ ≈ −1.37×10^5; FeSn: C_Drude ≈ 1.26×10^6, C
    The seven coefficients of Eq. (2) are fitted to each experimental χ_{y;xxx}(σ_xx) dataset; the mechanism identification is a reading of these fitted values.
  • Reference conductivity σ_xx0 = lowest-temperature conductivity per dataset (e.g., σ_xx0 referenced in expansions in Fig. 3 fits)
    The expansion (σ^{-1}−σ_0^{-1}) and the Table I weight ratios are defined relative to this per-dataset scale; results depend on its choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Boltzmann equation with relaxation-time, side-jump, and skew-scattering collision integrals (Appendix A, Eq. A4)
    Standard kinetic description, assumed valid at low frequency and weak disorder; the entire 20-mechanism enumeration lives inside this framework.
  • domain assumption Linear longitudinal conductivity σ_xx ∝ τ with temperature-independent carrier density (Appendix B, Eq. B1)
    Converts every τ-power into a σ-power. Real datasets vary σ over the measured temperature range; deviations from single-τ scaling would change the fingerprints.
  • domain assumption Scattering-matrix correlations scale as ⟨VV⟩ ~ n_i V_0^2 ~ σ^{-1}−σ_0^{-1} for all disorder mechanisms (Appendix B, Eq. B4)
    The load-bearing empirical input, imported from anomalous-Hall scaling (Ref. [57]); its uniform application to side-jump, skew-scattering, and mixed mechanisms is not derived in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper σ_xx/σ_xx0 ≈ 1 when stating Table I weights (text after Eq. B6)
    The weights are evaluated at σ≈σ_0, yet the experimental fits use σ ranging from σ_0 to ≈1.6 σ_0; the approximation and the fit range are in tension.
  • domain assumption The list of 20 mechanisms is complete (Fig. 2 and Appendix A)
    Completeness depends on which forms of the third-order intrinsic velocity and disorder collision terms are included; the paper itself notes v_TOI has several differing forms in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Identifying geometric third-order nonlinear transport in disordered materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OT6BHLYN

@misc{pith2026251024239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Identifying geometric third-order nonlinear transport in disordered materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OT6BHLYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.24239}
}
read the original abstract

In nonlinear transport, the quantum-geometric effects can generate higher-harmonic voltages in response to a driving current, which has defined a fast-moving field of intense interest. However, in realistic materials where disorder scattering also contributes to nonlinear transport, identifying the geometric mechanisms remains a challenge. In particular, a theoretical framework for data analysis is still lacking for nonlinear transport at any order. Here, we develop a mechanism-resolved and symmetry-guided framework for identifying mechanisms of third-order nonlinear transport in disordered materials. We find a total of 20 mechanisms of third-order nonlinear transport, by treating quantum-geometric and disorder-mediated mechanisms on an equal footing. More importantly, we propose a protocol of data analysis that combines symmetry diagnosis of magnetic point groups and scaling law of relation between the third-order nonlinear Hall conductivity and linear longitudinal conductivity. We identify characteristic fingerprints in the scaling-law weights, which allow the mechanisms to be quantitatively distinguished in experiments. We have applied the protocol to identify the geometric mechanisms in materials with and without time-reversal symmetry, including 2D materials, topological materials, and altermagnets. The theory can be generalized to arbitrary orders of nonlinear transport, further promoting nonlinear transport as a probe of geometric effects and phase transitions in quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.24239 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Third-order nonlinear Hall effect is measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. We use symbols to visualize the mechanisms of third [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The results of fitting the experimentally measured third-order nonlinear Hall conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [57]

    Multivariable scaling for the anomalous Hall effect

    D. Hou, G. Su, Y. Tian, X. Jin, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, “Multivariable scaling for the anomalous Hall effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 217203 (2015)

    2015

  2. [1]

    Field induced posi- tional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implica- tions

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, “Field induced posi- tional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implica- tions”, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

    2014

  3. [2]

    Intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal CuMnAs

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, “Intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal CuMnAs”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

    2021

  4. [3]

    Intrinsic second-order anoma- lous Hall effect and its application in compensated anti- ferromagnets

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, “Intrinsic second-order anoma- lous Hall effect and its application in compensated anti- ferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277202 (2021)

    2021

  5. [4]

    Equivalence of semiclassical and response theories for second-order non- linear ac Hall effects

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, “Equivalence of semiclassical and response theories for second-order non- linear ac Hall effects”, Phys. Rev. B110, 245406 (2024)

    2024

  6. [5]

    Definition and frequency dependence of intrinsic nonlinear current

    C. Xiao, J. Cao, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, “Definition and frequency dependence of intrinsic nonlinear current”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11180 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schny- der, “Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17386 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  8. [7]

    A clarification on quantum-metric-induced nonlinear trans- port

    X.-B. Qiang, T. Liu, Z.-X. Gao, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, “A clarification on quantum-metric-induced nonlinear trans- port”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02088 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Dissipation and geome- try in nonlinear quantum transports of multiband elec- tronic systems

    Y. Michishita and N. Nagaosa, “Dissipation and geome- try in nonlinear quantum transports of multiband elec- tronic systems”, Phys. Rev. B106, 125114 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric

    K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, “Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric”, Phys. Rev. B108, L201405 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Unification of non- linear anomalous Hall effect and nonreciprocal magne- toresistance in metals by the quantum geometry

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, “Unification of non- linear anomalous Hall effect and nonreciprocal magne- toresistance in metals by the quantum geometry”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026301 (2024)

    2024

  4. [11]

    Intrin- sic nonlinear Ohmic current

    Y. D. Wang, Z. F. Zhang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, “Intrin- sic nonlinear Ohmic current”, Phys. Rev. B109, 085419 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, “Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials”, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    Topological currents in black phosphorus with broken inversion symmetry

    T. Low, Y. Jiang, and F. Guinea, “Topological currents in black phosphorus with broken inversion symmetry”, Phys. Rev. B92, 235447 (2015)

    2015

  7. [14]

    Band signatures for strong nonlinear Hall effect in bi- layer WTe2

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Band signatures for strong nonlinear Hall effect in bi- layer WTe2”, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 266601 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang,et al., “Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions”, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  9. [16]

    Non- linear anomalous Hall effect in few-layer WTe 2

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, “Non- linear anomalous Hall effect in few-layer WTe 2”, Nat. Mater.18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Nonlinear Hall effects

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Nonlinear Hall effects”, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi,et al., “Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure”, Sci- ence381, 181 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang,et al., “Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet”, Nature621, 487 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Riemannian structure on man- ifolds of quantum states

    J. Provost and G. Vallee, “Riemannian structure on man- ifolds of quantum states”, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  14. [21]

    The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory

    R. Resta, “The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory”, Eur. Phys. J. B79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    Quan- tum geometry in condensed matter

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Quan- tum geometry in condensed matter”, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwae334 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    Quantum geometry in quantum mate- rials

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, “Quantum geometry in quantum mate- rials”, arXiv:2501.00098

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    Fluctuations, uncertainty re- lations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds

    B. Het´ enyi and P. L´ evay, “Fluctuations, uncertainty re- lations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds”, Phys. Rev. A108, 032218 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    Quan- tum geometry beyond projective single bands

    A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R.-J. Slager, “Quan- tum geometry beyond projective single bands”, arXiv:2303.02180 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Phonon- mediated nonlinear optical responses and quantum ge- ometry

    J. Hu, W. Li, H. Wang, and K. Chang, “Phonon- mediated nonlinear optical responses and quantum ge- ometry”, arXiv:2410.09677 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Frac- tional Chern insulators and theW ∞ algebra

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, “Frac- tional Chern insulators and theW ∞ algebra”, Phys Rev B85, 241308 (2012)

    2012

  21. [28]

    Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors

    R. Roy, “Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors”, Phys Rev B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    Geometric stabil- ity of topological lattice phases

    T. S. Jackson, G. M¨ oller, and R. Roy, “Geometric stabil- ity of topological lattice phases”, Nat Commun6, 8629 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, “Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands”, Nat Commun6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  24. [31]

    Supercon- ductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, “Supercon- ductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems”, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, “Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?”, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Higher-order nonlinear anomalous Hall effects in- duced by Berry curvature multipoles

    C.-P. Zhang, X.-J. Gao, Y.-M. Xie, H. C. Po, and K. T. Law, “Higher-order nonlinear anomalous Hall effects in- duced by Berry curvature multipoles”, Phys. Rev. B107, 115142 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Berry connection 6 polarizability tensor and third-order Hall effect

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, X. Feng, C. Xiao, W. Wu, S. Lai, W.-b. Gao, and S. A. Yang, “Berry connection 6 polarizability tensor and third-order Hall effect”, Phys. Rev. B105, 045118 (2022)

    2022

  28. [35]

    Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, “Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106701 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclas- sical theory

    L. Xiang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, “Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclas- sical theory”, Phys. Rev. B107, 075411 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polarizability tensor

    S. Lai, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Feng, N. Wang, et al., “Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polarizability tensor”, Nat. Nanotech- nol.16, 869 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in a quantum Hall system

    P. He, H. Isobe, G. K. W. Koon, J. Y. Tan, J. Hu, J. Li, N. Nagaosa, and J. Shen, “Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in a quantum Hall system”, Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 1460 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Room-temperature third-order nonlinear Hall ef- fect in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4

    C. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, S. Lai, C. Zhu, et al., “Room-temperature third-order nonlinear Hall ef- fect in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4”, Natl. Sci. Rev.9, nwac020 (2022)

    2022

  33. [40]

    Quantum metric third-order nonlinear Hall ef- fect in a non-centrosymmetric ferromagnet

    H. Yu, X. Li, Y.-Q. Bie, L. Yan, L. Zhou, P. Yu, and G. Yang, “Quantum metric third-order nonlinear Hall ef- fect in a non-centrosymmetric ferromagnet”, Nat. Com- mun.16, 7698 (2025)

    2025

  34. [41]

    Charge density wave modulated third-order nonlinear Hall effect in 1T- VSe2 nanosheets

    Z.-H. Chen, X. Liao, J.-W. Dong, X.-Y. Liu, T.-Y. Zhao, D. Li, A.-Q. Wang, and Z.-M. Liao, “Charge density wave modulated third-order nonlinear Hall effect in 1T- VSe2 nanosheets”, Phys. Rev. B110, 235135 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Magnetic field tunable third-order nonlinear transport in a heterodimensional superlattice

    H. Shi, X. Feng, L. Wang, H. Chen, B. Jiang, H. Wang, et al., “Magnetic field tunable third-order nonlinear transport in a heterodimensional superlattice”, Phys. Rev. B111, 235434 (2025)

    2025

  36. [43]

    Orbital polarization and third-order anomalous Hall effect in WTe 2

    X.-G. Ye, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, Z. Zang, Y. Ye, and Z.- M. Liao, “Orbital polarization and third-order anomalous Hall effect in WTe 2”, Phys. Rev. B106, 045414 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    Giant third-order nonlinear Hall effect in misfit layer compound (SnS) 1.17(NbS2)3

    S. Li, X. Wang, Z. Yang, L. Zhang, S. L. Teo, M. Lin, et al., “Giant third-order nonlinear Hall effect in misfit layer compound (SnS) 1.17(NbS2)3”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces16, 11043 (2024)

    2024

  38. [45]

    Quantum geometry quadrupole-induced third-order nonlinear transport in antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4

    H. Li, C. Zhang, C. Zhou, C. Ma, X. Lei, Z. Jin, H. He, B. Li, K. T. Law, and J. Wang, “Quantum geometry quadrupole-induced third-order nonlinear transport in antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4”, Nat. Commun.15, 7779 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    Electric field control of third-order nonlinear Hall effect

    J. Yang, L. Wei, Y. Li, L. Chen, W. Niu, J. Chen, J. Du, and Y. Pu, “Electric field control of third-order nonlinear Hall effect”, arXiv preprint (2025), 2506.10657

    2025 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Quan- tum third-order nonlinear Hall effect of a four-terminal device with time-reversal symmetry

    M. Wei, L. Xiang, L. Wang, F. Xu, and J. Wang, “Quan- tum third-order nonlinear Hall effect of a four-terminal device with time-reversal symmetry”, Phys. Rev. B106, 035307 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    Third-order Hall effect in the surface states of a topological insulator

    T. Nag, S. K. Das, C. Zeng, and S. Nandy, “Third-order Hall effect in the surface states of a topological insulator”, Phys. Rev. B107, 245141 (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    Quan- tum geometry induced third-order nonlinear transport responses

    D. Mandal, S. Sarkar, K. Das, and A. Agarwal, “Quan- tum geometry induced third-order nonlinear transport responses”, Phys. Rev. B110, 195131 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Polarization and third-order Hall effect in III–V semiconductor heterojunctions

    O. Pal and T. K. Ghosh, “Polarization and third-order Hall effect in III–V semiconductor heterojunctions”, Phys. Rev. B109, 035202 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Role of disorder in the third-order anoma- lous Hall effect in time-reversal symmetric systems

    C. K. Barman, A. Chattopadhyay, S. Sarkar, J.-X. Zhu, and S. Nandy, “Role of disorder in the third-order anoma- lous Hall effect in time-reversal symmetric systems”, Phys. Rev. B111, 235113 (2025)

    2025

  45. [52]

    Anomalous Hall effect

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, “Anomalous Hall effect”, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  46. [53]

    Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, “Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties”, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  47. [54]

    Discrete differential geometry: An applied in- troduction

    K. Crane, “Discrete differential geometry: An applied in- troduction”, Notices of the AMS, Communication1153 (2018)

    2018

  48. [55]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics(Plenum Press, 1990)

    1990

  49. [56]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Cengage Learning, 1976)

    1976

  50. [58]

    Gate-tunable Berry curvature dipole polarizability in Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2

    T.-Y. Zhao, A.-Q. Wang, X.-G. Ye, X.-Y. Liu, X. Liao, and Z.-M. Liao, “Gate-tunable Berry curvature dipole polarizability in Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2”, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 186302 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Experimental evidence for a Berry curvature quadrupole in an antiferromagnet

    S. Sankar, R. Liu, C.-P. Zhang, Q.-F. Li, C. Chen, X.-J. Gao,et al., “Experimental evidence for a Berry curvature quadrupole in an antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. X14, 021046 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in altermagnet RuO2

    R. Y. Chu, L. Han, Z. H. Gong, X. Z. Fu, H. Bai, and et al., “Third-order nonlinear Hall effect in altermagnet RuO2”, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    See Supplemental Materials for the detailed calculations

  54. [62]

    Disorder-induced nonlinear Hall effect with time- reversal symmetry

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, S. Li, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Disorder-induced nonlinear Hall effect with time- reversal symmetry”, Nat. Commun.10, 3047 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Semiclassical theories of the anomalous Hall effect

    N. A. Sinitsyn, “Semiclassical theories of the anomalous Hall effect”, J. Phys. Condens. Matter20, 023201 (2008). 7 End Matter Appendix A: Calculation of third-order nonlinear con- ductivity.The nonlinear conductivityχ abc can be calcu- lated from the electric current densityJ...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.