Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Higher-order discrete time crystals and enhanced sensing in a quantum kicked top

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A kicked quantum top hosts a period-4 time crystal

desk verdict Genuinely new 4-DTC candidate in the kicked top, but the phase claim is under-supported and the QFI/metrology result exists only in the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.26600 v2 pith:JCMUY6WQ submitted 2025-10-30 quant-ph

Subhashis Das , Vishal Khan , Atanu Rajak This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords discretetimecrystalquantumkickedtophigher-orderDTCall-to-allspinmodeldynamicalfreezingFisherinformationsemiclassicalphaseportraitspiralsaddlepoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the simplest kicked quantum top—an all-to-all coupled spin model with quadratic, p=2 interactions—supports a stable period-4 discrete time crystal (4-DTC). That contradicts an earlier rule suggesting p=2 models can only host a period-2 DTC. The 4-DTC appears only for initial states near a semiclassical spiral saddle, becomes more stable as the angular momentum grows, and cannot be explained by the system's Z2 symmetry. The paper also identifies robust period-2 DTC and dynamical-freezing phases at alternating multiples of π, and reports enhanced quantum Fisher information at phase boundaries, suggesting the transitions are useful for parameter sensing.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is a spiral saddle point in the classical phase portrait of the kicked top. Linearizing the classical map around (X,Y,Z)=(1,0,0) for p=π/2 gives a Jacobian whose eigenvalues are one real positive and a complex-conjugate pair with negative real parts—a spiral saddle. Nearby trajectories are funneled toward the θ=0 and θ=π streamlines and cycle through four phase-space islands, producing the period-4 subharmonic response of ⟨J_z⟩. This semiclassical structure, analyzed through spin coherent states, is what the authors use to explain a higher-order DTC that the discrete Z2 symmetry of the model cannot account for.

What would settle it

Compute the height of the frequency-1/4 Fourier peak of the stroboscopic magnetization ⟨J_z(t)⟩ for p=π/2, k=1.5 as a function of J (e.g., 50, 100, 200, 400), starting from a spin coherent state at θ≈π/2; if the peak decays with increasing J, the claimed thermodynamic phase collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a higher-order discrete time crystal can exist in an all-to-all p=2 Floquet model. In the quantum kicked top with Floquet operator U = exp(-i(k/2j)Jz^2) exp(-ipJy), exact period-4 oscillations of the average magnetization appear for p=π/2 and moderate kick strength k=1.5 when the spin size J is large (J>20). The mechanism is geometric: a spiral saddle point at θ=π/2, φ=0 in the semiclassical stroboscopic map directs nearby initial states toward two streamlines near θ=0 and θ=π, producing a four-island cycle. This period-4 phase is not a free-rotation artifact because it persists for nonzero k and disappears in the chaotic regime k>3. The paper supports its stabi

Load-bearing premise

The 4-DTC is a genuine thermodynamic phase, not a finite-size or initial-state-selected artifact, so the period-4 response persists in the limit J→∞.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 4-DTC is genuine, the previously proposed q≤p bound for higher-order DTCs in all-to-all p-spin models is broken: quadratic all-to-all interactions suffice for a period-4 subharmonic response.
  • The 2-DTC and dynamical-freezing phases at alternating multiples of π come with an emergent conservation law [Jz(t), Jz(0)] = 0, giving a clean, disorder-free mechanism for dynamical freezing.
  • The 4-DTC is state-selective: only initial spin coherent states near the classical spiral saddle show it, so experiments should prepare states close to θ≈π/2.
  • Enhanced quantum Fisher information at phase boundaries suggests the kicked top's dynamical transitions can serve as sensitive probes for estimating drive parameters such as p or k.
  • The observed decrease of linear entropy with increasing J in the 4-DTC indicates that larger spin systems should display sharper period-4 oscillations, making the phase more robust with system size.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spiral-saddle mechanism hints at a general route to higher-order DTCs in other kicked or Floquet systems: any fixed point whose linearized map has one real and one complex-conjugate eigenvalue pair may produce period-4 subharmonic dynamics, independent of discrete symmetries.
  • Because the 4-DTC is initial-state selected, its experimental detection will require careful state preparation; a systematic scan of initial SCSs would map the basin of attraction of the period-4 phase.
  • The disappearance of the 4-DTC at k>3 coincides with the onset of chaos, suggesting the phase is tied to regular islands; whether it survives as a prethermal phenomenon or is replaced by exponential decay at extremely long times remains open.
  • The enhanced quantum Fisher information at phase boundaries could enable Heisenberg-limited estimation of p or k if the scaling of the QFI with J is analyzed, though the paper does not explicitly compute that scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quantum kicked top (all-to-all p=2 spin model) under periodic kicks, characterizing dynamical phases via the stroboscopic magnetization, an order parameter O (Eq. 10), a standard-deviation measure Δ(k,p) (Eq. 11), linear entropy (Eq. 12), and infinite-temperature OTOCs (Eq. 14). The authors report robust 2-DTC and dynamical-freezing (DF) phases around odd and even multiples of p=π, respectively, and claim the existence of a robust 4-DTC phase near p=π/2 for J>20, which they interpret through a classical spiral saddle at θ=π/2, φ=0. The abstract also advertises enhanced metrological sensitivity at phase boundaries via the quantum Fisher information, but the full text contains no QFI analysis.

Significance. If the central 4-DTC claim were fully established, it would be a notable counterexample to the q≤p expectation for higher-order DTCs in all-to-all p-body models, and the semiclassical spiral-saddle mechanism is a fresh perspective. The exact 2-DTC/DF behavior at p=mπ for the polarized state is a clean, reproducible analytic result, and the OTOC observation of emergent dynamical conservation is interesting. However, the advertised QFI/metrology result is entirely absent from the manuscript, and the 4-DTC 'phase' claim rests on finite-J numerical traces and a two-size linear-entropy comparison, so the paper in its current form does not justify its headline claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B/III.C, Figs. 3, 4, 6] The central 'robust 4-DTC phase' claim is not established. The evidence consists of a J=100 stroboscopic trace (Fig. 4(b)), a J=100 phase diagram (Fig. 3(b)), and a linear-entropy comparison at only two sizes, j=10 and J=100 (Figs. 6(c,d)). No scaling of the period-4 Fourier amplitude, its width, or the oscillation lifetime with J is provided, and no J→∞ extrapolation is attempted. The text itself states that the 4-DTC appears only for J>20 and only for certain initial states, but no initial-state basin fraction or measure is quantified. Conditions (II) rigidity and (III) persistence as defined in Sec. III.B are therefore not demonstrated. Moreover, since k=0 already yields period-4 precession at p=π/2, the interaction-stabilized nature of the 4-DTC is not isolated; the k=1.5 result may be a continuation of the trivial free-precession limit.
  2. [Appendix A] The spiral-saddle explanation does not provide evidence for a stable period-4 cycle. The Jacobian eigenvalues listed in the table show an unstable real eigenvalue at every tabulated k (λ1≈1.35 at k=1, growing with k), so the fixed point at θ=π/2, φ=0 is not stable. The observed period-4 response could be a finite-time transient near a separatrix or a classical nonlinear resonance, which is generic in the kicked top and not necessarily a Floquet many-body phase. Please identify a stable 4-cycle in the classical map or provide a quantum spectral signature (e.g., four-fold quasienergy clustering) that persists in the thermodynamic limit.
  3. [Abstract vs. full text] The abstract states: 'By investigating the quantum Fisher information, we also demonstrate enhanced metrological sensitivity at the boundaries between different dynamical phases for the estimation of system parameters.' However, the full text contains no section, equation, or figure on quantum Fisher information; the conclusion only lists quantum metrology as a future direction. This advertised result is absent and must either be added with a concrete analysis or removed from the abstract and conclusions.
  4. [Eqs. (10)-(11), Fig. 3] The phase diagram is built from a finite-time window N=4000 and the single initial state |j,-j>. The order-parameter values are not tested for convergence with N or J. Since the 4-DTC region is identified from the same Δ(k,p) plot, a convergence check in N and J is necessary to rule out finite-time artifacts; the current phase diagram cannot distinguish a true phase from a long transient.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Secs. III.B and III.C] There is a notational inconsistency: Sec. III.B quotes ⟨Jz(0)⟩=-0.5 for |j,-j>, while Sec. III.C states ⟨Jz(t)⟩=-j; figures label the vertical axis as ⟨Jz(t)⟩ without consistently indicating whether the per-spin normalization of Eq. (9) is used.
  2. [Appendix A table] For k=4, the eigenvalues are listed as λ2=λ3=-0.9+2.2i; one of them should be the complex conjugate -0.9-2.2i. Also, the arrow notation in the matrix derivation is hard to follow.
  3. [Sec. III.C, Eq. (14)] The infinite-temperature OTOC normalization is not defined; the large values (∼10^5, ∼10^7) depend on the Hilbert-space dimension d=2j+1. Please specify the normalization and the operators used (e.g., J_x/J or J_x).
  4. [Sec. III.C] The claim [Jz(nτ), Jz(0)]=0 for p=π and p=2π is an operator statement, but the text justifies it through expectation values. A short derivation or a reference is needed, otherwise the 'dynamical conservation' claim is not supported.
  5. [References] Reference [42] has a typo in the author list ('K. J. . N. Pizzi, A.'). The caption of Fig. 6 uses 'entanglement entropy' while the text uses 'linear entropy'; please harmonize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: phases are read off direct time evolution; gaps in thermodynamic-limit scaling and the missing QFI section are support issues, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain from the Hamiltonian Eq. (1) to the Floquet operator Eq. (2) and the classical map Eq. (4) is self-contained and algebraic. The dynamical phases are classified using direct stroboscopic evolution of ⟨Jz(n)⟩ (Figs. 2–4), and the order parameters O and Δ in Eqs. (10)–(11) are diagnostic definitions rather than fitted parameters later relabeled as predictions. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted constant is renamed as a predicted quantity. The main weakness of the 4-DTC claim is evidentiary, not circular: the 4-DTC is identified at J=100 for selected initial states near a classical spiral saddle, and the thermodynamic-limit scaling of the subharmonic amplitude or lifetime is not provided. The paper's own linear-entropy comparison (Figs. 6(c,d)) is only two system sizes (j=10 and j=100). That is an absence of evidence for rigidity and persistence, which are part of the paper's own DTC definition, but it is not a circular reduction of the derivation. There are no load-bearing self-citations. References to prior higher-order DTC work, such as Refs. [19] and [42], are to other groups' results and are used for context rather than as the proof of the present phase. The p=π/2 free-precession period-4 at k=0 is explicitly noted in the text as a baseline; it is not a hidden fitted input. I also flag, per the reviewing rule, that the abstract's claim of enhanced metrological sensitivity via quantum Fisher information has no corresponding section in the full text. This is a missing-support issue, not a circularity issue, because the QFI claim is not used as an input to any derivation. Overall, the paper's phase identification is read off from direct numerical evolution, and the classical spiral-saddle explanation is post hoc but does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities and no fitted theoretical constants. However, the 4-DTC demonstration depends on chosen operating points (p=π/2, k=1.5, J=100) and selected initial states; these are not fitted but are post-hoc choices. The semiclassical-to-quantum transfer is an assumption, not derived.

free parameters (4)
  • Initial-state parameters for 4-DTC (θ, φ) = θ≈π (|j,-j⟩) and θ=0.2, φ=0.5
    The 4-DTC signal is only reported for these selected states; the paper does not show period-4 response for generic states.
  • Kick strength k = 1.5
    Representative operating point inside the 4-DTC region of the Δ(k,p) map; no analytic boundary or derivation.
  • Drive angle p = π/2
    The 4-DTC occurs at this resonance; at p=mπ/2 with m odd.
  • Angular momentum J (system size) = 100 (and 10 for comparison)
    The robustness claim relies on J=100 vs J=10; no asymptotic scaling.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Floquet evolution and SU(2) angular momentum algebra
    Used to write U in Eq. (2) and expectation values; standard.
  • domain assumption Kicked top maps to all-to-all spin-1/2 chain (p=2 infinite-range Ising)
    Invoked in Sec. II to justify many-body description and N=2J; follows standard mapping, but DTC thermodynamic-limit claims inherit this identification.
  • domain assumption Semiclassical limit j→∞ and spin-coherent-state correspondence
    Used to interpret 4-DTC via classical phase portraits (Sec. III.B, Fig. 5); assumes quantum dynamics at J=100 tracks classical islands.
  • domain assumption Infinite-temperature OTOC is an appropriate diagnostic of dynamical conservation
    Eq. (14); assumes C∞=0 for [Jz(n),Jz(0)] demonstrates emergent conservation.
  • ad hoc to paper The q≤p ordering from Ref. [19] is the correct benchmark for bounding DTC order in p-body models
    Used to frame the 4-DTC in a p=2 model as surprising; if Ref. [19]'s bound has different caveats, the novelty framing weakens.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-order discrete time crystals and enhanced sensing in a quantum kicked top." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCMUY6WQ

@misc{pith2026251026600,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-order discrete time crystals and enhanced sensing in a quantum kicked top},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCMUY6WQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.26600}
}
abstract

We characterize various dynamical phases of the simplest version of the quantum kicked top model, a paradigmatic system for studying quantum chaos, which exhibits both regular and chaotic behavior depending on the kick strength. In a previous study, the existence of higher-order discrete time crystals (DTCs) was observed in an infinite-range interacting $p$-spin model, where it was proposed that the order of the DTC satisfies the relation $q\le p$. Within this framework, the $p=2$ model is expected to host only a $2$-DTC phase. However, interestingly, we demonstrate here the existence of a robust $4$-DTC phase in the quantum kicked top, which effectively corresponds to a $p=2$ model with infinite-range interactions. We also show that the system hosts robust $2$-DTC and dynamical freezing (DF) phases around alternating rotationally symmetric points. We explain the emergence of higher-order DTC phases through the classical phase portraits of the system, connected with spin coherent states (SCSs), by identifying special islands that arise within a specific parametric regime. Unlike the $2$-DTC phase, the $4$-DTC phase appears only for certain initial states, as demonstrated through exact calculations. The robustness of the $4$-DTC phase is further investigated through the dynamics of the linear entropy as a function of the angular momentum. We also find an emergent conservation law for both the $2$-DTC and DF phases, while no dynamical conservation arises periodically for the $4$-DTC phase. By investigating the quantum Fisher information, we also demonstrate enhanced metrological sensitivity at the boundaries between different dynamical phases for the estimation of system parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.26600 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Variation of mean level spacing ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Variation of the average magnetization, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Density plots of (a) the order parameter ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Illustration of the emergence of a spiral saddle node by tuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of linear entropy (LE) with stroboscopic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Evolution of the OTOC corresponding to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Many-body dynamical localization in Fock space

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Many-body dynamical localization emerges in the Fock space of a driven interacting bosonic system, suppressing transport and producing a crossover to Poisson spectral statistics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    T. Nag, S. Roy, A. Dutta, and D. Sen, Dynamical lo- calization in a chain of hard core bosons under periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B89, 165425 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature reviews physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Harper, R

    F. Harper, R. Roy, M. S. Rudner, and S. Sondhi, Topol- ogy and broken symmetry in floquet systems, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics11, 345 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Physical review letters116, 250401 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Physical review letters118, 030401 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Physical review letters117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Sacha and J

    K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 016401 (2017)

    2017

  2. [11]

    N. Y. Yao and C. Nayak, Time crystals in periodically driven systems, Physics Today71, 40–47 (2018)

    2018

  3. [12]

    Khemani, R

    V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. Sondhi, A brief history of time crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10745 (2019)

    1910 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Sacha,Time crystals, Vol

    K. Sacha,Time crystals, Vol. 114 (Springer, 2020)

    2020

  5. [14]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Physical Review X4, 041048 (2014)

    2014

  6. [15]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Physical Review E90, 012110 (2014)

    2014

  7. [16]

    Choudhury and E

    S. Choudhury and E. J. Mueller, Stability of a floquet bose-einstein condensate in a one-dimensional optical lat- tice, Physical Review A90, 013621 (2014)

    2014

  8. [17]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath,et al., Observation of a discrete time crys- tal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

    2017

  9. [18]

    Russomanno, F

    A. Russomanno, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Floquet time crystal in the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214307, Phys. Rev. B95, 214307 (2017)

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    M. H. Mu˜ noz Arias, K. Chinni, and P. M. Poggi, Floquet time crystals in driven spin systems with all-to-allp-body interactions, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023018, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023018 (2022)

    2022 doi

  11. [20]

    Biswas and S

    H. Biswas and S. Choudhury, Discrete time crys- tals in the spin-s central spin model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13207 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Kyprianidis, F

    A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano,et al., Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science372, 1192 (2021)

    2021

  13. [22]

    S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V. Khemani,et al., Ob- servation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature543, 221 (2017)

    2017

  14. [23]

    Pizzi, J

    A. Pizzi, J. Knolle, and A. Nunnenkamp, Period-n discrete time crystals and quasicrystals with ultracold bosons, Physical review letters123, 150601 (2019)

    2019

  15. [24]

    R. W. Bomantara, Quantum repetition codes as build- ing blocks of large-period discrete time crystals, Physical Review B104, L180304 (2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    F. M. Surace, A. Russomanno, M. Dalmonte, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Floquet time crystals in clock models, Physical Review B99, 104303 (2019)

    2019

  17. [26]

    Das, Exotic freezing of response in a quantum many- body system, Phys

    A. Das, Exotic freezing of response in a quantum many- body system, Phys. Rev. B82, 172402 (2010)

    2010

  18. [27]

    Haldar, D

    A. Haldar, D. Sen, R. Moessner, and A. Das, Dynamical freezing and scar points in strongly driven floquet matter: Resonance vs emergent conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021008 (2021)

    2021

  19. [28]

    Haldar and A

    A. Haldar and A. Das, Statistical mechanics of floquet quantum matter: exact and emergent conservation laws, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 234001 (2022)

    2022

  20. [29]

    H(t) = p τ Jy + k 2j J 2 z ∞X n=−∞ δ(t−nτ),(1) where{J x, Jy, Jz}are three components of an angu- lar momentum having commutation relation [J i, Jj] = iϵijk Jk

    for studying quantum chaos. H(t) = p τ Jy + k 2j J 2 z ∞X n=−∞ δ(t−nτ),(1) where{J x, Jy, Jz}are three components of an angu- lar momentum having commutation relation [J i, Jj] = iϵijk Jk. The Hamiltonian describes an angular momen- tum vector precessing around the y-axis with...

    2023

  21. [30]

    Haake, M

    F. Haake, M. Ku´ s, and R. Scharf, Classi- cal and quantum chaos for a kicked top, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303727, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter65, 381 (1987)

    1987 doi

  22. [31]

    Chaudhury, A

    S. Chaudhury, A. Smith, B. Anderson, S. Ghose, and P. S. Jessen, Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked top, Nature461, 768 (2009). 10

    2009

  23. [32]

    Krithika, V

    V. Krithika, V. Anjusha, U. T. Bhosale, and T. Mahesh, Nmr studies of quantum chaos in a two-qubit kicked top, Physical Review E99, 032219 (2019)

    2019

  24. [33]

    Olsacher, L

    T. Olsacher, L. Pastori, C. Kokail, L. M. Sieberer, and P. Zoller, Digital quantum simulation, learning of the flo- quet hamiltonian, and quantum chaos of the kicked top, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 334003 (2022)

    2022

  25. [34]

    Lombardi and A

    M. Lombardi and A. Matzkin, Entan- glement and chaos in the kicked top, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016207, Phys- ical Review E83, 10.1103/physreve.83.016207 (2011)

    2011 doi

  26. [35]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    2018

  27. [36]

    Sreeram and M

    P. Sreeram and M. Santhanam, Periodicity of dynami- cal signatures of chaos in quantum kicked top, Physics Letters A , 130596 (2025)

    2025

  28. [37]

    Chaudhury, A

    S. Chaudhury, A. Smith, B. Anderson, S. Ghose, and P. Jessen, Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked top,https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08396, Nature461, 768 (2009)

    2009 doi

  29. [38]

    A. V. Purohit and U. T. Bhosale, The study of dou- ble kicked top: a classical and quantum perspec- tive, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.06103 Focus to learn more, Phys. Rev. A (2025), arXiv:2503.06103 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi

  30. [39]

    Liang, Y

    C. Liang, Y. Zhang, and S. Chen, Statistical and dynam- ical aspects of quantum chaos in a kicked bose-hubbard dimer, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.033316, Phys. Rev. A109, 033316 (2024)

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    V. R. Krithika, V. S. Anjusha, U. T. Bhos- ale, and T. S. Mahesh, Nmr studies of quantum chaos in a two-qubit kicked top, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032219, Phys. Rev. E99, 032219 (2019)

    2019 doi

  32. [41]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecu- tive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.084101, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 084101 (2013)

    2013 doi

  33. [42]

    Giraud, N

    O. Giraud, N. Mac´ e, E. Vernier, and F. Alet, Probing symmetries of quantum many-body systems through gap ratio statis- tics,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011006, Phys. Rev. X12, 011006 (2022)

    2022 doi

  34. [43]

    K. J. . N. Pizzi, A., Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in clean long-range interacting systems, Nat Commun 12, 2341 (2021) (2021)

    2021

  35. [44]

    Hashimoto, K

    K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, and R. Yoshii, Out- of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09435 , Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 10.1007/jhep10(2017)138 (2017)

    2017 doi arXiv

  36. [45]

    Garc ˜A ˆAa-Mata, R

    I. Garc ˜A ˆAa-Mata, R. Jalabert, and D. Wisniacki, Out-of-time-order correlations and quantum chaos, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.07965 , Scholarpe- dia18, 55237 (2023)

    2023 doi arXiv

  37. [46]

    M. A. Porter, An introduction to quantum chaos, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.nlin/0107039 (2001), arXiv:nlin/0107039 [nlin.CD]

    2001 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402, Physical Review Letters117, 10.1103/phys- revlett.117.090402 (2016)

    2016 doi

  39. [48]

    B¨ acker, M

    A. B¨ acker, M. Haque, and I. M. Khaymovich, Multifractal dimensions for random matrices, chaotic quantum maps, and many-body systems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032117, Physical Review E100, 10.1103/physreve.100.032117 (2019)

    2019 doi

  40. [49]

    Torrielli, Lectures on classical integrability, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.02946 (2016), arXiv:1606.02946 [hep-th]

    A. Torrielli, Lectures on classical integrability, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.02946 (2016), arXiv:1606.02946 [hep-th]

    2016 doi arXiv

  41. [50]

    P. Kos, M. Ljubotina, and T. c. v. Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos: Analytic connection to random matrix theory, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021062, Phys. Rev. X8, 021062 (2018)

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    Fleckenstein and M

    C. Fleckenstein and M. Bukov, Prethermalization and thermalization in periodically driven many- body systems away from the high-frequency limit, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L140302, Phys. Rev. B103, L140302 (2021)

    2021 doi

  43. [52]

    Fleckenstein and M

    C. Fleckenstein and M. Bukov, Thermalization and prethermalization in periodically kicked quantum spin chains, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.144307, Phys. Rev. B103, 144307 (2021)

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    Ponte, Z

    P. Ponte, Z. Papi´ c, F. m. c. Huveneers, and D. A. Abanin, Many-body localization in periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 140401 (2015)

    2015

  45. [54]

    Mallayya, M

    K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, and W. De Roeck, Prethermal- ization and thermalization in isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X9, 021027 (2019)

    2019

  46. [55]

    S. S. H., Nonlinear dynamics and chaos : With applica- tions to physics, biology, Chemistry and Engineering441 (1994)

    1994

  47. [56]

    St¨ ockmann,Quantum Chaos: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    H.-J. St¨ ockmann,Quantum Chaos: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    1999

  48. [57]

    Y. Li, C. Wang, Y. Tang, and Y.-C. Liu, Time crystal in a single-mode nonlinear cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 183803 (2024)

    2024

  49. [58]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic hall effect in graphene, Physical Review B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  50. [59]

    D’Alessio and A

    L. D’Alessio and A. Polkovnikov, Many-body energy lo- calization transition in periodically driven systems, An- nals of Physics333, 19 (2013). 11 Appendix A: Emergence of ”new region” atp=π/2 We takeθ=π/2, ϕ= 0 which implies coordinate (1,0,0). Now by stability analysis, we fi...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.