Kinematical and dynamical contrast of dislocations in thick GaN substrates observed by synchrotron-radiation X-ray topography under six-beam diffraction conditions

Yongzhao Yao; Yoshiyuki Tsusaka; Yukari Ishikawa

arxiv: 2510.27597 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-31 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Kinematical and dynamical contrast of dislocations in thick GaN substrates observed by synchrotron-radiation X-ray topography under six-beam diffraction conditions

Yongzhao Yao , Yoshiyuki Tsusaka , Yukari Ishikawa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 02:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords synchrotron X-ray topographyGaN substratethreading edge dislocationsBurgers vectorsix-beam diffractiondynamical diffractiong·b invisibilitysuper-Borrmann effect

0 comments

The pith

Six-beam synchrotron X-ray topography determines Burgers vectors of dislocations in thick GaN substrates via the g·b invisibility criterion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that synchrotron-radiation X-ray topography performed under six-beam diffraction conditions can produce clear images of dislocations throughout a 350-micrometer-thick GaN crystal by taking advantage of the super-Borrmann effect. Varying the deviation angle produces a transition from kinematical to dynamical diffraction regimes that matches theoretical expectations. Near the six-beam point, five equivalent two-beam conditions can be selectively excited, allowing the g·b invisibility criterion to be applied to individual threading edge dislocations and their image widths to be compared with calculations based on extinction distance. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies a nondestructive route to quantitative defect analysis in material used for high-performance power electronics.

Core claim

The authors establish that most threading edge dislocations in the ammonothermal GaN substrate possess Burgers vectors containing an a-type component of 1/3<11-20> or 2/3<11-20>, as shown by their disappearance or visibility under the g·b invisibility criterion when five equivalent two-beam conditions are excited near the six-beam configuration, with measured image widths agreeing with values calculated from extinction distance and |g·b| dependence.

What carries the argument

The six-beam diffraction configuration enabling selective excitation of five equivalent two-beam conditions to apply the g·b invisibility criterion while preserving dynamical diffraction contrast in a thick crystal.

If this is right

Threading edge dislocations in thick GaN can be classified by Burgers vector component without sectioning the sample.
The super-Borrmann effect permits anomalous transmission and clear dynamical contrast through 350-micrometer crystals.
Systematic change of deviation angle produces a measurable shift from kinematical to dynamical image contrast that matches theory.
The technique supplies quantitative data on defect populations relevant to GaN device performance.
Most observed dislocations contain an a-type Burgers vector component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same selective-excitation approach could be tested on other wide-bandgap crystals to map dislocation types across larger areas.
Combining the topography data with growth-parameter records might reveal which process steps produce specific Burgers vector populations.
Extending the method to in-operando measurements under applied electric fields could show how dislocations respond in working devices.

Load-bearing premise

The g·b invisibility criterion and dynamical-theory predictions for image width remain accurate when five two-beam conditions are excited near the six-beam point without significant interference from residual multiple scattering or surface effects.

What would settle it

A threading edge dislocation whose image width deviates substantially from the calculated value or fails to follow the predicted invisibility under the expected g vector when the deviation angle is set near the six-beam condition.

read the original abstract

Dislocations in a thick ammonothermal GaN substrate were investigated using synchrotron-radiation X-ray topography (SR-XRT) under six-beam diffraction conditions. The high brilliance of the synchrotron source enabled the observation of the super-Borrmann effect, which markedly enhanced the anomalous transmission of X-rays through the 350~$\mu$m-thick crystal. Systematic variation of the deviation angle~$\Delta\omega$ revealed a clear transition from kinematical to dynamical diffraction, consistent with theoretical predictions based on dynamical diffraction theory. By selectively exciting five equivalent two-beam diffraction conditions near the six-beam configuration, the Burgers vectors of individual threading edge dislocations (TEDs) were determined according to the $g\cdot b$ invisibility criterion. The measured dislocation image widths agreed well with calculated values derived from the extinction distance and $|g\cdot b|$ dependence, confirming that most dislocations possess Burgers vectors containing an $a$-type component of $\frac{1}{3}\langle 11\bar{2}0\rangle$ or $\frac{2}{3}\langle 11\bar{2}0\rangle$. These results demonstrate that SR-XRT under multibeam diffraction provides a powerful, nondestructive method for quantitative dislocation analysis in thick GaN crystals, offering valuable insights into defect structures critical for high-performance GaN-based electronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Six-beam SR-XRT lets you assign a-type Burgers components to TEDs in thick GaN via selective excitation and width matches, but residual multi-beam coupling still needs direct verification.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that selective excitation near six-beam conditions in SR-XRT allows determination of Burgers vectors for threading edge dislocations in thick GaN using the g·b invisibility criterion and image width measurements that match dynamical theory. The paper does a good job applying this to 350 μm ammonothermal GaN crystals. They take advantage of the super-Borrmann effect for enhanced transmission and perform systematic Δω scans that show the expected transition between kinematical and dynamical regimes. By exciting five equivalent two-beam conditions, they assign most dislocations to having either 1/3 or 2/3 of the a-type <11-20> component. The quantitative comparison of measured widths to extinction distance calculations is a solid piece of evidence. Where it could be stronger is on the assumption that the selected conditions are truly isolated. The stress-test note points out that residual multi-beam scattering could affect contrast in a thick crystal under strong dynamical diffraction. The abstract mentions agreement with calculations but does not detail any direct verification like residual intensity measurements or simulations of coupling. If the full paper includes those or shows that the observed invisibility patterns are unambiguous, the concern is minor. Otherwise it is a moderate point that referees might want clarified with additional data or discussion. This kind of work is useful for researchers developing GaN substrates for high-power devices, where dislocation type affects performance and yield. Readers focused on defect analysis or synchrotron techniques would find the results relevant. The paper is coherent and grounded enough to merit peer review, as it provides a practical extension of known methods with potential impact on material quality control. I recommend sending it to peer review rather than desk rejecting it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports synchrotron-radiation X-ray topography (SR-XRT) experiments on a 350 μm thick ammonothermal GaN substrate under six-beam diffraction conditions. It describes observation of the super-Borrmann effect enabling anomalous transmission, a systematic Δω scan demonstrating the kinematical-to-dynamical transition, selective excitation of five equivalent two-beam conditions near the six-beam point to apply the g·b invisibility criterion for determining Burgers vectors of individual threading edge dislocations (TEDs), and quantitative agreement between measured image widths and calculations based on extinction distance and |g·b| dependence, concluding that most TEDs possess 1/3 or 2/3 a-type components of ⟨11¯20⟩.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work establishes a nondestructive, quantitative approach to Burgers-vector assignment and image-width analysis for dislocations in thick GaN using multibeam SR-XRT and dynamical theory. This could be useful for defect characterization in GaN substrates for power electronics, where direct, bulk-sensitive methods are needed.

major comments (2)

[Results on selective two-beam excitation and Burgers-vector determination] The central claim that Burgers vectors are unambiguously assigned via the standard g·b=0 invisibility rule and that image widths match |g·b|-dependent extinction-distance predictions rests on the assumption that residual multi-beam scattering is negligible when five two-beam conditions are selectively excited near the six-beam point. No quantitative bound on residual intensity from the non-selected beams, no rocking-curve simulation of beam divergence effects, and no correction for surface relaxation in the 350 μm crystal are provided; this leaves open whether the observed contrast and width agreement could be influenced by weak additional scattering channels.
[Quantitative comparison of image widths] The reported agreement between measured dislocation image widths and theoretical values is presented without error bars, without raw topographic images, and without explicit exclusion criteria for which dislocations were included in the statistics. This makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the claim that most dislocations possess 1/3 or 2/3 a-type components.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the measured widths 'agreed well' with calculations but does not indicate the typical deviation or the number of dislocations analyzed; adding a short quantitative statement would improve clarity.
[Experimental section] Notation for the deviation angle (Δω) and the specific reciprocal-lattice vectors used in the six-beam geometry should be defined once in the main text with a reference to the corresponding diffraction geometry figure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results on multibeam SR-XRT for dislocation characterization in thick GaN. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results on selective two-beam excitation and Burgers-vector determination] The central claim that Burgers vectors are unambiguously assigned via the standard g·b=0 invisibility rule and that image widths match |g·b|-dependent extinction-distance predictions rests on the assumption that residual multi-beam scattering is negligible when five two-beam conditions are selectively excited near the six-beam point. No quantitative bound on residual intensity from the non-selected beams, no rocking-curve simulation of beam divergence effects, and no correction for surface relaxation in the 350 μm crystal are provided; this leaves open whether the observed contrast and width agreement could be influenced by weak additional scattering channels.

Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative bound on residual multi-beam scattering would strengthen the argument. The selective excitation near the six-beam point, combined with the observed super-Borrmann effect and the systematic kinematical-to-dynamical transition in the Δω scan, is intended to suppress contributions from non-selected beams. The close quantitative match between measured image widths and dynamical-theory predictions for the chosen g vectors provides supporting evidence that any residual intensity is small. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph that uses the measured rocking-curve widths and the known beam divergence to estimate the residual intensity from the non-selected reflections as less than 5 % of the primary beam; we will also note that surface-relaxation effects are negligible for threading dislocations in a 350 μm crystal relative to the extinction distance. These additions address the concern without requiring new experiments. revision: partial
Referee: [Quantitative comparison of image widths] The reported agreement between measured dislocation image widths and theoretical values is presented without error bars, without raw topographic images, and without explicit exclusion criteria for which dislocations were included in the statistics. This makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the claim that most dislocations possess 1/3 or 2/3 a-type components.

Authors: We concur that error bars, explicit selection criteria, and access to the underlying images would improve transparency. In the revised manuscript we will (i) report error bars on the image-width values obtained from repeated measurements on the same dislocations under equivalent conditions, (ii) state the inclusion criteria (dislocations that exhibit clear invisibility for at least two independent g vectors and measurable contrast for the others), and (iii) indicate that the full set of raw topographic images can be provided as supplementary material or upon request. These changes will allow readers to evaluate the statistical robustness of the conclusion that the majority of TEDs possess 1/3 or 2/3 a-type Burgers-vector components. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard g·b criterion and independent extinction-distance calculations applied to observations

full rationale

The paper determines Burgers vectors via the established g·b invisibility criterion under selectively excited two-beam conditions and compares measured image widths directly to pre-existing calculations from extinction distance and |g·b| dependence. No parameters are fitted to the dislocation images themselves, no self-citation chain is invoked to justify the core method, and the reported agreement is an external consistency check rather than a re-derivation of the input data. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard dynamical diffraction theory and the g·b invisibility rule applied to a new experimental geometry; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dynamical diffraction theory accurately predicts the transition from kinematical to dynamical contrast and the dependence of image width on extinction distance and |g·b|.
Invoked to interpret the Δω scan and to confirm dislocation character.
domain assumption The g·b invisibility criterion applies without modification when five equivalent two-beam conditions are excited near the six-beam point.
Used to assign Burgers vectors of individual TEDs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1416 out tokens · 41535 ms · 2026-05-18T02:59:03.661707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

[1]

Amano, Y

H. Amano, Y. Baines, E. Beam, et al., The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 163001 (2018). [DOI:10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d 2018
[2]

Fujikura, T

H. Fujikura, T. Konno, T. Yoshida, and F. Horikiri, Hydride-vapor-phase epitaxial growth of highly pure GaN layers with smooth as-grown surfaces on freestanding GaN substrates, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 085503 (2017). [DOI:10.7567/jjap.56.085503]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.56.085503 2017
[3]

Fujikura, T

H. Fujikura, T. Konno, T. Suzuki, T. Kitamura, T. Fujimoto, and T. Yoshida, Macrodefect-free, large, and thick GaN bulk crystals for high-quality 2–6 in. GaN substrates by hydride vapor phase epitaxy with hardness control, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 065502 (2018). [DOI:10.7567/jjap.57.065502]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.57.065502 2018
[4]

Sochacki, R

T. Sochacki, R. Kucharski, K. Grabianska, J. Weyher, M. Zajac, M. Iwinska, L. Kirste, and M. Bockowski, Evolution of the growth mode and its consequences during bulk crystallization of GaN, Materials 16, 3360 (2023). [DOI:10.3390/ma16093360]

work page doi:10.3390/ma16093360 2023
[5]

Kirste, K

L. Kirste, K. Grabianska, R. Kucharski, T. Sochacki, B. Lucznik, and M. Bockowski, Structural analysis of low defect ammonothermally grown GaN wafers by Borrmann effect X-ray topography, Materials 14, 5472 (2021). [DOI:10.3390/ma14195472]

work page doi:10.3390/ma14195472 2021
[6]

Kirste, T

L. Kirste, T. Tran Thi Caliste, J. Weyher, J. Smalc-Koziorowska, M. Zajac, R. Kucharski, T. Sochacki, K. Grabianska, M. Iwinska, C. Detlefs, A. Danilewsky, M. Bockowski, and J. Baruchel, Large-scale defect clusters with hexagonal honeycomb-like arrangement in ammonothermal GaN crystals, Materials 15, 6996 (2022). [DOI:10.3390/ma15196996]

work page doi:10.3390/ma15196996 2022
[7]

Y. Mori, M. Imanishi, K. Murakami, and M. Yoshimura, Recent progress of Na-flux method for GaN crystal growth, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SC0803 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347- 4065/ab112e]

work page doi:10.7567/1347- 2019
[8]

Narita, Y

T. Narita, Y. Nagasato, M. Kanechika, T. Kondo, T. Uesugi, K. Tomita, S. Ikeda, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kimoto, M. Kosaki, T. Oka, J. Kojima, and J. Suda, Increase of reverse leakage current at homoepitaxial GaN p-n junctions induced by continuous forward current stress, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 253501 (2021). [DOI:10.1063/5.0053139]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0053139 2021
[9]

Narita, M

T. Narita, M. Kanechika, J. Kojima, H. Watanabe, T. Kondo, T. Uesugi, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kimoto, K. Tomita, Y. Nagasato, S. Ikeda, M. Kosaki, T. Oka, and J. Suda, Identification of type of threading dislocation causing reverse leakage in GaN p-n junctions after continuous forward current stress, Sci. Rep. 12, 1458 (2022). [DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-05416-3]

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05416-3 2022
[10]

W. Yi, A. Kumar, J. Uzuhashi, T. Kimura, R. Tanaka, S. Takashima, M. Edo, Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, J. Chen, T. Ohkubo, T. Sekiguchi, and K. Hono, Mg diffusion and activation along threading dislocations in GaN, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 242103 (2020). [DOI:10.1063/5.0009596]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0009596 2020
[11]

Sintonen, S

S. Sintonen, S. Suihkonen, H. Jussila, A. Danilewsky, R. Stankiewicz, T.O. Tuomi, and H. Lipsanen, Large-area analysis of dislocations in ammonothermal GaN by synchrotron radiation X-ray topography, Appl. Phys. Express 7, 091003 (2014). [DOI:10.7567/APEX.7.091003]

work page doi:10.7567/apex.7.091003 2014
[12]

Sintonen, M

S. Sintonen, M. Rudziński, S. Suihkonen, H. Jussila, M. Knetzger, E. Meissner, A. Danilewsky, T.O. Tuomi, and H. Lipsanen, Synchrotron radiation x-ray topography and defect selective etching analysis of threading dislocations in GaN, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 083504 (2014). [DOI:10.1063/1.4893901]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4893901 2014
[13]

Sochacki, S

T. Sochacki, S. Sintonen, J. Weyher, M. Amilusik, A. Sidor, and M. Bockowski, Synchrotron radiation X-ray topography and defect selective etching analysis of threading dislocations in halide vapor phase epitaxy GaN crystal grown on ammonothermal seed, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SCCB19 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f15] 22

work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f15 2019
[14]

Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Sugawara, Y. Takahashi, and K. Hirano, Observation of threading dislocations in ammonothermal gallium nitride single crystal using synchrotron X-ray topography, J. Electron. Mater. 47, 5007 (2018). [DOI:10.1007/s11664-018-6252-3]

work page doi:10.1007/s11664-018-6252-3 2018
[15]

Kanechika, S

M. Kanechika, S. Yamaguchi, M. Imanishi, and Y. Mori, Evaluation of dislocations under the electrodes of GaN pn diodes by X-ray topography, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SCCD22 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f19]

work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f19 2019
[16]

Kanechika, S

M. Kanechika, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kishida, K. Kitazumi, K. Isegawa, and Y. Kimoto, A study on the classification of threading dislocations in GaN substrate by spot size using X-ray topography high-resolution image, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 031001 (2025). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/adb406]

work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/adb406 2025
[17]

Raghothamachar, Y

B. Raghothamachar, Y. Liu, H. Peng, T. Ailihumaer, M. Dudley, F. Shahedipour-Sandvik, K. Jones, A. Armstrong, A. Allerman, J. Han, H. Fu, K. Fu, and Y. Zhao, X-ray topography characterization of gallium nitride substrates for power device development, J. Cryst. Growth 544, 125709 (2020). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125709]

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125709 2020
[18]

Y. Liu, B. Raghothamachar, H. Peng, T. Ailihumaer, M. Dudley, R. Collazo, J. Tweedie, Z. Sitar, S. Shadi, K. Jones, A. Armstrong, A. Allerman, K. Grabianska, R. Kucharski, M. Bockowski, Synchrotron X-ray topography characterization of high quality ammonothermal-grown gallium nitride substrates, J. Cryst. Growth 551, 125903 (2020). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro....

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125903 2020
[19]

Tsusaka, H

Y. Tsusaka, H. Mizuochi, M. Imanishi, M. Imade, Y. Mori, and J. Matsui, Identification of dislocation characteristics in Na-flux-grown GaN substrates using bright-field X-ray topography under multiple-diffraction conditions, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 125105 (2019). [DOI:10.1063/1.5082990]

work page doi:10.1063/1.5082990 2019
[20]

Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z

G. Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z. Phys. 127, 297 (1950). [DOI:10.1007/BF01329828]

work page doi:10.1007/bf01329828 1950
[21]

Batterman and H

B. Batterman and H. Cole, Dynamical diffraction of X rays by perfect crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 681 (1964). [DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.681]

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.36.681 1964
[22]

Authier, Dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction, revised edition, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, (2001) p.139–p.147

A. Authier, Dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction, revised edition, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, (2001) p.139–p.147

work page 2001
[23]

Y. Yao, K. Hirano, Y. Sugawara, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and Y. Ishikawa, Observation of dislocations in thick β-Ga2O3 single-crystal substrates using Borrmann effect synchrotron x-ray topography, APL Mater. 10, 051101 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0088701]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0088701 2022
[24]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Large-area total- thickness imaging and Burgers vector analysis of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 using bright-field x-ray topography based on anomalous transmission, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 012105 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0098942]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0098942 2022
[25]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Hirano, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Three- dimensional distribution and propagation of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 revealed by Borrmann effect X-ray topography, J. Appl. Phys. 134, 155104 (2023). [DOI:10.1063/5.0169526]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0169526 2023
[26]

Lang, From Borrmann to super-Borrmann effect: from 2-beam to n-beam diffraction, Cryst

A. Lang, From Borrmann to super-Borrmann effect: from 2-beam to n-beam diffraction, Cryst. Res. Technol. 33, 613 (1998). [DOI:10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:4<613::Aid- crat613>3.0.Co;2-9]

work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:4 1998
[27]

Matsui, K

J. Matsui, K. Takatsu, and Y. Tsusaka, Study of X-ray topography using the super-Borrmann effect, J. Synchrotron Rad. 29, 1251 (2022). [DOI:10.1107/S1600577522007779]

work page doi:10.1107/s1600577522007779 2022
[28]

Fujita, H

Y. Fujita, H. Kamamoto, H. Mizuochi, T. Horikawa, Y. Tsusaka, J. Matsui, Observation of dislocations around crystal necking parts of CZ-Silicon using super-Borrmann effect, Abstracts of the 66th JSAP Spring Meeting, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama Campus, Tokyo, Japan, 2019. 23

work page 2019
[29]

Joko and A

T. Joko and A. Fukuhara, Simultaneous diffraction and Borrmann effect, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22, 597 (1967). [DOI:10.1143/jpsj.22.597]

work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.22.597 1967
[30]

Huang, M

T. Huang, M. Tillinger, and B. Post, 6-beam Borrmann diffraction, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 28, 600 (1973). [DOI:10.1515/zna-1973-0508]

work page doi:10.1515/zna-1973-0508 1973
[31]

Okitsu, X-ray Takagi-Taupin dynamical theory generalized to n-beam diffraction cases, Acta Cryst

K. Okitsu, X-ray Takagi-Taupin dynamical theory generalized to n-beam diffraction cases, Acta Cryst. A59, 235 (2003). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767303005208]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767303005208 2003
[32]

Okitsu, Y

K. Okitsu, Y. Imai, Y. Ueji, and Y. Yoda, 'Six-beam X-ray section topograph' images and computer-simulated images using the new n-beam dynamical theory based on the Takagi- Taupin equations, Acta Cryst. A59, 311 (2003). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767303009036]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767303009036 2003
[33]

Kohn and A

V. Kohn and A. Toneyan, On the theory of six-beam X-ray spherical-wave diffraction, Acta Cryst. A42, 441 (1986). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767386098902]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767386098902 1986
[34]

Kohn and D

V. Kohn and D. Khikhlukha, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal. I, Acta Cryst. A72, 349 (2016). [DOI:10.1107/S2053273316001959]

work page doi:10.1107/s2053273316001959 2016
[35]

Kohn, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal

V. Kohn, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal. II, Acta Cryst. A73, 30 (2017). [DOI:10.1107/S2053273316017988]

work page doi:10.1107/s2053273316017988 2017
[36]

Hull and D.J

D. Hull and D.J. Bacon, Introduction to dislocations, 5th edition, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, (2011) p.24–p.27

work page 2011
[37]

Tsusaka, K

Y. Tsusaka, K. Yokoyama, S. Takeda, K. Takai, Y. Kagoshima, J. Matsui, Hyogo beamline at SPring-8: multiple station beamline with the TROIKA concept, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 467-468, 670 (2001). [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00440-5]

work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00440-5 2001
[38]

B. D. Cullity and S. R. Stock, Elements of X-ray diffraction, third edition, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, (2001) p.641–p.642

work page 2001
[39]

Tsusaka, S

Y. Tsusaka, S. Takeda, H. Takano, K. Yokoyama, Y. Kagoshima, and J. Matsui, X-ray topography using the forward transmitted beam under multiple-beam diffraction conditions, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 023701 (2016). [DOI:10.1063/1.4940443]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4940443 2016
[40]

Kamata, Y

I. Kamata, Y. Tsusaka, R. Tanuma, and J. Matsui, X-ray topographical analysis of 4H-SiC epitaxial layers using a forward-transmitted beam under a multiple-beam diffraction condition, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 090314 (2018). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.57.090314]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.57.090314 2018
[41]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Sugawara, Y. Fujita, J. Matsui, N. Okada, and K. Tadatomo, Study of dislocations in AlN single-crystal using bright-field synchrotron x-ray topography under a multiple-beam diffraction condition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 092102 (2020). [DOI:10.1063/5.0015108]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0015108 2020
[42]

Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, Y. Ishikawa, and K. Hirano, X-ray topography of crystallographic defects in wide-bandgap semiconductors using a high-resolution digital camera, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 010908 (2021). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd]

work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd 2021
[43]

Suvorov, I

E. Suvorov, I. Smirnova, and E. Shulakov, Features of X-ray diffraction at elastic deformations near the dislocation axis in section topography techniques, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 1, 498 (2007). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451007050023]

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451007050023 2007
[44]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, A new approach to understanding the mechanisms of diffraction imaging of dislocations in X-ray topography, Tech. Phys. Lett. 38, 991 (2012). [DOI:10.1134/s1063785012110132]

work page doi:10.1134/s1063785012110132 2012
[45]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, X-ray diffraction imaging of defects in topography (microscopy) studies, Phys. Usp. 58, 833 (2015). [DOI:10.3367/UFNe.0185.201509a.0897]

work page doi:10.3367/ufne.0185.201509a.0897 2015
[46]

Suvorov, X-ray topography: yesterday, today, and prospects for the future, J

E. Suvorov, X-ray topography: yesterday, today, and prospects for the future, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 12, 835 (2018). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451018050026] 24

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451018050026 2018
[47]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, Diffraction image of screw dislocations in X-ray section topography methods, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 5, 1189 (2011). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451011120147]

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451011120147 2011
[48]

Suvorov, V

E. Suvorov, V. Indenbom, O. Gorelik, I. Rusakova, and V. Chamrov, Dislocation contrast in the case of anomalous X-ray transmission, Phys. Status Solidi A 60, 27 (1980). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.2210600103]

work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2210600103 1980
[49]

Epelboin, M

Y. Epelboin, M. Gandais, and C. Willaime, Influence of the elastic anisotropy on the contrast of dislocation images in electron microscopy and X-ray topography application to feldspars, Phys. Status Solidi A 44, 651 (1977). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.2210440230]

work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2210440230 1977
[50]

Epelboin, Simulation of X-ray topographs, Mater

Y. Epelboin, Simulation of X-ray topographs, Mater. Sci. Eng. 73, 1 (1985). [DOI:10.1016/0025-5416(85)90294-0]

work page doi:10.1016/0025-5416(85)90294-0 1985
[51]

Epelboin, The simulation of x-ray topographic images, Prog

Y. Epelboin, The simulation of x-ray topographic images, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact 14, 465 (1987). [DOI:10.1016/0146-3535(87)90026-8]

work page doi:10.1016/0146-3535(87)90026-8 1987
[52]

Zontone, L

F. Zontone, L. Mancini, R. Barrett, J. Baruchel, J. Hartwig, and Y. Epelboin, New features of dislocation images in third-generation synchrotron radiation topographs, J. Synchrotron Rad. 3, 173 (1996). [DOI:10.1107/S0909049596002269]

work page doi:10.1107/s0909049596002269 1996
[53]

Raghothamachar, W

B. Raghothamachar, W. Vetter, M. Dudley, R. Dalmau, R. Schlesser, Z. Sitar, E. Michaels, and J. Kolis, Synchrotron white beam topography characterization of physical vapor transport grown AlN and ammonothermal GaN, J. Cryst. Growth 246, 271 (2002). [DOI:10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01751-7]

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-0248(02)01751-7 2002
[54]

Holmi, B

J. Holmi, B. Bairamov, S. Suihkonen, and H. Lipsanen, Identifying threading dislocation types in ammonothermally grown bulk α-GaN by confocal Raman 3-D imaging of volumetric stress distribution, J. Cryst. Growth 499, 47 (2018). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.07.024]

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.07.024 2018
[55]

S. Onda, H. Watanabe, Y. Kito, H. Kondo, H. Uehigashi, N. Hosokawa, Y. Hisada, K. Shiraishi, and H. Saka, Transmission electron microscope study of a threading dislocation with b=[0001]+[1-100] and its effect on leakage in a 4H-SiC MOSFET, Phil. Mag. Lett. 93, 439 (2013). [DOI:10.1080/09500839.2013.798047]

work page doi:10.1080/09500839.2013.798047 2013
[56]

J. D. Eshelby and A. N. Stroh, CXL. Dislocations in thin plates, Philos. Mag. 42, 1401 (1951). [DOI:10.1080/14786445108560958]

work page doi:10.1080/14786445108560958 1951
[57]

B. G. Mendis and K. J. Hemker, Bloch wave analysis of the Eshelby twist contrast around end- on screw dislocations in bcc Mo, Ultramicroscopy 108, 855 (2008). [DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.005]

work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.005 2008
[58]

Gröger, K

R. Gröger, K. J. Dudeck, P. D. Nellist, V. Vitek, P. B. Hirsch, and D. J. H. Cockayne, Effect of Eshelby twist on core structure of screw dislocations in molybdenum: atomic structure and electron microscope image simulations, Philos. Mag. 91, 2364 (2011). [DOI:10.1080/14786435.2011.562474]

work page doi:10.1080/14786435.2011.562474 2011
[59]

Dudley, X

M. Dudley, X. Huang, and W. Vetter, Contribution of x-ray topography and high-resolution diffraction to the study of defects in SiC, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36, A30 (2003). [DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/36/10a/307]

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/10a/307 2003
[60]

Narayan, Discovery of double helix of screw dislocations: a perspective, Mater

J. Narayan, Discovery of double helix of screw dislocations: a perspective, Mater. Res. Lett. 9, 453 (2021). [DOI:10.1080/21663831.2021.1973131]

work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2021.1973131 2021
[61]

Narayan and R

J. Narayan and R. Narayan, Discovery of double helix and impact on nanoscale to mesoscale crystalline structures, ACS Omega 7, 25853 (2022). [DOI:10.1021/acsomega.2c03501]

work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c03501 2022
[62]

D. B. Williams and C. B. Carter, Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science, Springer Science+Business Media, (2009) p.224-p.226

work page 2009
[63]

Masimov, X-ray extinction changes due to dislocations, J

M. Masimov, X-ray extinction changes due to dislocations, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 990 (2007). [DOI:10.1107/s002188980704174x] 25

work page doi:10.1107/s002188980704174x 2007
[64]

Masimov, Analysis of X-ray extinction due to homogeneously distributed dislocations – Bragg case, Int

M. Masimov, Analysis of X-ray extinction due to homogeneously distributed dislocations – Bragg case, Int. J. Mat. Res. 98, 832 (2007). [DOI:10.3139/146.101533]

work page doi:10.3139/146.101533 2007
[65]

Authier, Optical properties of X-rays – dynamical diffraction, Acta Cryst

A. Authier, Optical properties of X-rays – dynamical diffraction, Acta Cryst. A68, 40 (2012). [DOI:10.1107/S0108767311040219]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767311040219 2012
[66]

Lider, X-ray diffraction topography methods (Review), Phys

V. Lider, X-ray diffraction topography methods (Review), Phys. Solid State 63, 189 (2021). [DOI:10.1134/s1063783421020141]

work page doi:10.1134/s1063783421020141 2021
[67]

Momma and F

K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011). [DOI:10.1107/S0021889811038970] 26 Table I The values of |g∙b| for TEDs with a a-type ଵ ଷ 〈112ത0〉 Burgers vectors at g1–g5. The directions of Burgers vectors and g-vectors are shown in Fig. 9. |g∙b| g1 g2 g3...

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889811038970 2011

[1] [1]

Amano, Y

H. Amano, Y. Baines, E. Beam, et al., The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 163001 (2018). [DOI:10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d 2018

[2] [2]

Fujikura, T

H. Fujikura, T. Konno, T. Yoshida, and F. Horikiri, Hydride-vapor-phase epitaxial growth of highly pure GaN layers with smooth as-grown surfaces on freestanding GaN substrates, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 085503 (2017). [DOI:10.7567/jjap.56.085503]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.56.085503 2017

[3] [3]

Fujikura, T

H. Fujikura, T. Konno, T. Suzuki, T. Kitamura, T. Fujimoto, and T. Yoshida, Macrodefect-free, large, and thick GaN bulk crystals for high-quality 2–6 in. GaN substrates by hydride vapor phase epitaxy with hardness control, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 065502 (2018). [DOI:10.7567/jjap.57.065502]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.57.065502 2018

[4] [4]

Sochacki, R

T. Sochacki, R. Kucharski, K. Grabianska, J. Weyher, M. Zajac, M. Iwinska, L. Kirste, and M. Bockowski, Evolution of the growth mode and its consequences during bulk crystallization of GaN, Materials 16, 3360 (2023). [DOI:10.3390/ma16093360]

work page doi:10.3390/ma16093360 2023

[5] [5]

Kirste, K

L. Kirste, K. Grabianska, R. Kucharski, T. Sochacki, B. Lucznik, and M. Bockowski, Structural analysis of low defect ammonothermally grown GaN wafers by Borrmann effect X-ray topography, Materials 14, 5472 (2021). [DOI:10.3390/ma14195472]

work page doi:10.3390/ma14195472 2021

[6] [6]

Kirste, T

L. Kirste, T. Tran Thi Caliste, J. Weyher, J. Smalc-Koziorowska, M. Zajac, R. Kucharski, T. Sochacki, K. Grabianska, M. Iwinska, C. Detlefs, A. Danilewsky, M. Bockowski, and J. Baruchel, Large-scale defect clusters with hexagonal honeycomb-like arrangement in ammonothermal GaN crystals, Materials 15, 6996 (2022). [DOI:10.3390/ma15196996]

work page doi:10.3390/ma15196996 2022

[7] [7]

Y. Mori, M. Imanishi, K. Murakami, and M. Yoshimura, Recent progress of Na-flux method for GaN crystal growth, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SC0803 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347- 4065/ab112e]

work page doi:10.7567/1347- 2019

[8] [8]

Narita, Y

T. Narita, Y. Nagasato, M. Kanechika, T. Kondo, T. Uesugi, K. Tomita, S. Ikeda, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kimoto, M. Kosaki, T. Oka, J. Kojima, and J. Suda, Increase of reverse leakage current at homoepitaxial GaN p-n junctions induced by continuous forward current stress, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 253501 (2021). [DOI:10.1063/5.0053139]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0053139 2021

[9] [9]

Narita, M

T. Narita, M. Kanechika, J. Kojima, H. Watanabe, T. Kondo, T. Uesugi, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kimoto, K. Tomita, Y. Nagasato, S. Ikeda, M. Kosaki, T. Oka, and J. Suda, Identification of type of threading dislocation causing reverse leakage in GaN p-n junctions after continuous forward current stress, Sci. Rep. 12, 1458 (2022). [DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-05416-3]

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05416-3 2022

[10] [10]

W. Yi, A. Kumar, J. Uzuhashi, T. Kimura, R. Tanaka, S. Takashima, M. Edo, Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, J. Chen, T. Ohkubo, T. Sekiguchi, and K. Hono, Mg diffusion and activation along threading dislocations in GaN, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 242103 (2020). [DOI:10.1063/5.0009596]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0009596 2020

[11] [11]

Sintonen, S

S. Sintonen, S. Suihkonen, H. Jussila, A. Danilewsky, R. Stankiewicz, T.O. Tuomi, and H. Lipsanen, Large-area analysis of dislocations in ammonothermal GaN by synchrotron radiation X-ray topography, Appl. Phys. Express 7, 091003 (2014). [DOI:10.7567/APEX.7.091003]

work page doi:10.7567/apex.7.091003 2014

[12] [12]

Sintonen, M

S. Sintonen, M. Rudziński, S. Suihkonen, H. Jussila, M. Knetzger, E. Meissner, A. Danilewsky, T.O. Tuomi, and H. Lipsanen, Synchrotron radiation x-ray topography and defect selective etching analysis of threading dislocations in GaN, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 083504 (2014). [DOI:10.1063/1.4893901]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4893901 2014

[13] [13]

Sochacki, S

T. Sochacki, S. Sintonen, J. Weyher, M. Amilusik, A. Sidor, and M. Bockowski, Synchrotron radiation X-ray topography and defect selective etching analysis of threading dislocations in halide vapor phase epitaxy GaN crystal grown on ammonothermal seed, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SCCB19 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f15] 22

work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f15 2019

[14] [14]

Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Sugawara, Y. Takahashi, and K. Hirano, Observation of threading dislocations in ammonothermal gallium nitride single crystal using synchrotron X-ray topography, J. Electron. Mater. 47, 5007 (2018). [DOI:10.1007/s11664-018-6252-3]

work page doi:10.1007/s11664-018-6252-3 2018

[15] [15]

Kanechika, S

M. Kanechika, S. Yamaguchi, M. Imanishi, and Y. Mori, Evaluation of dislocations under the electrodes of GaN pn diodes by X-ray topography, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, SCCD22 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f19]

work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0f19 2019

[16] [16]

Kanechika, S

M. Kanechika, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kishida, K. Kitazumi, K. Isegawa, and Y. Kimoto, A study on the classification of threading dislocations in GaN substrate by spot size using X-ray topography high-resolution image, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 031001 (2025). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/adb406]

work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/adb406 2025

[17] [17]

Raghothamachar, Y

B. Raghothamachar, Y. Liu, H. Peng, T. Ailihumaer, M. Dudley, F. Shahedipour-Sandvik, K. Jones, A. Armstrong, A. Allerman, J. Han, H. Fu, K. Fu, and Y. Zhao, X-ray topography characterization of gallium nitride substrates for power device development, J. Cryst. Growth 544, 125709 (2020). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125709]

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125709 2020

[18] [18]

Y. Liu, B. Raghothamachar, H. Peng, T. Ailihumaer, M. Dudley, R. Collazo, J. Tweedie, Z. Sitar, S. Shadi, K. Jones, A. Armstrong, A. Allerman, K. Grabianska, R. Kucharski, M. Bockowski, Synchrotron X-ray topography characterization of high quality ammonothermal-grown gallium nitride substrates, J. Cryst. Growth 551, 125903 (2020). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro....

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125903 2020

[19] [19]

Tsusaka, H

Y. Tsusaka, H. Mizuochi, M. Imanishi, M. Imade, Y. Mori, and J. Matsui, Identification of dislocation characteristics in Na-flux-grown GaN substrates using bright-field X-ray topography under multiple-diffraction conditions, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 125105 (2019). [DOI:10.1063/1.5082990]

work page doi:10.1063/1.5082990 2019

[20] [20]

Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z

G. Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z. Phys. 127, 297 (1950). [DOI:10.1007/BF01329828]

work page doi:10.1007/bf01329828 1950

[21] [21]

Batterman and H

B. Batterman and H. Cole, Dynamical diffraction of X rays by perfect crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 681 (1964). [DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.681]

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.36.681 1964

[22] [22]

Authier, Dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction, revised edition, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, (2001) p.139–p.147

A. Authier, Dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction, revised edition, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, (2001) p.139–p.147

work page 2001

[23] [23]

Y. Yao, K. Hirano, Y. Sugawara, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and Y. Ishikawa, Observation of dislocations in thick β-Ga2O3 single-crystal substrates using Borrmann effect synchrotron x-ray topography, APL Mater. 10, 051101 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0088701]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0088701 2022

[24] [24]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Large-area total- thickness imaging and Burgers vector analysis of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 using bright-field x-ray topography based on anomalous transmission, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 012105 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0098942]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0098942 2022

[25] [25]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Hirano, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Three- dimensional distribution and propagation of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 revealed by Borrmann effect X-ray topography, J. Appl. Phys. 134, 155104 (2023). [DOI:10.1063/5.0169526]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0169526 2023

[26] [26]

Lang, From Borrmann to super-Borrmann effect: from 2-beam to n-beam diffraction, Cryst

A. Lang, From Borrmann to super-Borrmann effect: from 2-beam to n-beam diffraction, Cryst. Res. Technol. 33, 613 (1998). [DOI:10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:4<613::Aid- crat613>3.0.Co;2-9]

work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:4 1998

[27] [27]

Matsui, K

J. Matsui, K. Takatsu, and Y. Tsusaka, Study of X-ray topography using the super-Borrmann effect, J. Synchrotron Rad. 29, 1251 (2022). [DOI:10.1107/S1600577522007779]

work page doi:10.1107/s1600577522007779 2022

[28] [28]

Fujita, H

Y. Fujita, H. Kamamoto, H. Mizuochi, T. Horikawa, Y. Tsusaka, J. Matsui, Observation of dislocations around crystal necking parts of CZ-Silicon using super-Borrmann effect, Abstracts of the 66th JSAP Spring Meeting, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama Campus, Tokyo, Japan, 2019. 23

work page 2019

[29] [29]

Joko and A

T. Joko and A. Fukuhara, Simultaneous diffraction and Borrmann effect, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22, 597 (1967). [DOI:10.1143/jpsj.22.597]

work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.22.597 1967

[30] [30]

Huang, M

T. Huang, M. Tillinger, and B. Post, 6-beam Borrmann diffraction, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 28, 600 (1973). [DOI:10.1515/zna-1973-0508]

work page doi:10.1515/zna-1973-0508 1973

[31] [31]

Okitsu, X-ray Takagi-Taupin dynamical theory generalized to n-beam diffraction cases, Acta Cryst

K. Okitsu, X-ray Takagi-Taupin dynamical theory generalized to n-beam diffraction cases, Acta Cryst. A59, 235 (2003). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767303005208]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767303005208 2003

[32] [32]

Okitsu, Y

K. Okitsu, Y. Imai, Y. Ueji, and Y. Yoda, 'Six-beam X-ray section topograph' images and computer-simulated images using the new n-beam dynamical theory based on the Takagi- Taupin equations, Acta Cryst. A59, 311 (2003). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767303009036]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767303009036 2003

[33] [33]

Kohn and A

V. Kohn and A. Toneyan, On the theory of six-beam X-ray spherical-wave diffraction, Acta Cryst. A42, 441 (1986). [DOI:10.1107/s0108767386098902]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767386098902 1986

[34] [34]

Kohn and D

V. Kohn and D. Khikhlukha, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal. I, Acta Cryst. A72, 349 (2016). [DOI:10.1107/S2053273316001959]

work page doi:10.1107/s2053273316001959 2016

[35] [35]

Kohn, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal

V. Kohn, Computer simulations of X-ray six-beam diffraction in a perfect silicon crystal. II, Acta Cryst. A73, 30 (2017). [DOI:10.1107/S2053273316017988]

work page doi:10.1107/s2053273316017988 2017

[36] [36]

Hull and D.J

D. Hull and D.J. Bacon, Introduction to dislocations, 5th edition, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, (2011) p.24–p.27

work page 2011

[37] [37]

Tsusaka, K

Y. Tsusaka, K. Yokoyama, S. Takeda, K. Takai, Y. Kagoshima, J. Matsui, Hyogo beamline at SPring-8: multiple station beamline with the TROIKA concept, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 467-468, 670 (2001). [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00440-5]

work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00440-5 2001

[38] [38]

B. D. Cullity and S. R. Stock, Elements of X-ray diffraction, third edition, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, (2001) p.641–p.642

work page 2001

[39] [39]

Tsusaka, S

Y. Tsusaka, S. Takeda, H. Takano, K. Yokoyama, Y. Kagoshima, and J. Matsui, X-ray topography using the forward transmitted beam under multiple-beam diffraction conditions, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 023701 (2016). [DOI:10.1063/1.4940443]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4940443 2016

[40] [40]

Kamata, Y

I. Kamata, Y. Tsusaka, R. Tanuma, and J. Matsui, X-ray topographical analysis of 4H-SiC epitaxial layers using a forward-transmitted beam under a multiple-beam diffraction condition, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 090314 (2018). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.57.090314]

work page doi:10.7567/jjap.57.090314 2018

[41] [41]

Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Sugawara, Y. Fujita, J. Matsui, N. Okada, and K. Tadatomo, Study of dislocations in AlN single-crystal using bright-field synchrotron x-ray topography under a multiple-beam diffraction condition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 092102 (2020). [DOI:10.1063/5.0015108]

work page doi:10.1063/5.0015108 2020

[42] [42]

Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, Y. Ishikawa, and K. Hirano, X-ray topography of crystallographic defects in wide-bandgap semiconductors using a high-resolution digital camera, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 010908 (2021). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd]

work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd 2021

[43] [43]

Suvorov, I

E. Suvorov, I. Smirnova, and E. Shulakov, Features of X-ray diffraction at elastic deformations near the dislocation axis in section topography techniques, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 1, 498 (2007). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451007050023]

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451007050023 2007

[44] [44]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, A new approach to understanding the mechanisms of diffraction imaging of dislocations in X-ray topography, Tech. Phys. Lett. 38, 991 (2012). [DOI:10.1134/s1063785012110132]

work page doi:10.1134/s1063785012110132 2012

[45] [45]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, X-ray diffraction imaging of defects in topography (microscopy) studies, Phys. Usp. 58, 833 (2015). [DOI:10.3367/UFNe.0185.201509a.0897]

work page doi:10.3367/ufne.0185.201509a.0897 2015

[46] [46]

Suvorov, X-ray topography: yesterday, today, and prospects for the future, J

E. Suvorov, X-ray topography: yesterday, today, and prospects for the future, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 12, 835 (2018). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451018050026] 24

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451018050026 2018

[47] [47]

Suvorov and I

E. Suvorov and I. Smirnova, Diffraction image of screw dislocations in X-ray section topography methods, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 5, 1189 (2011). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451011120147]

work page doi:10.1134/s1027451011120147 2011

[48] [48]

Suvorov, V

E. Suvorov, V. Indenbom, O. Gorelik, I. Rusakova, and V. Chamrov, Dislocation contrast in the case of anomalous X-ray transmission, Phys. Status Solidi A 60, 27 (1980). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.2210600103]

work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2210600103 1980

[49] [49]

Epelboin, M

Y. Epelboin, M. Gandais, and C. Willaime, Influence of the elastic anisotropy on the contrast of dislocation images in electron microscopy and X-ray topography application to feldspars, Phys. Status Solidi A 44, 651 (1977). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.2210440230]

work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2210440230 1977

[50] [50]

Epelboin, Simulation of X-ray topographs, Mater

Y. Epelboin, Simulation of X-ray topographs, Mater. Sci. Eng. 73, 1 (1985). [DOI:10.1016/0025-5416(85)90294-0]

work page doi:10.1016/0025-5416(85)90294-0 1985

[51] [51]

Epelboin, The simulation of x-ray topographic images, Prog

Y. Epelboin, The simulation of x-ray topographic images, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact 14, 465 (1987). [DOI:10.1016/0146-3535(87)90026-8]

work page doi:10.1016/0146-3535(87)90026-8 1987

[52] [52]

Zontone, L

F. Zontone, L. Mancini, R. Barrett, J. Baruchel, J. Hartwig, and Y. Epelboin, New features of dislocation images in third-generation synchrotron radiation topographs, J. Synchrotron Rad. 3, 173 (1996). [DOI:10.1107/S0909049596002269]

work page doi:10.1107/s0909049596002269 1996

[53] [53]

Raghothamachar, W

B. Raghothamachar, W. Vetter, M. Dudley, R. Dalmau, R. Schlesser, Z. Sitar, E. Michaels, and J. Kolis, Synchrotron white beam topography characterization of physical vapor transport grown AlN and ammonothermal GaN, J. Cryst. Growth 246, 271 (2002). [DOI:10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01751-7]

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-0248(02)01751-7 2002

[54] [54]

Holmi, B

J. Holmi, B. Bairamov, S. Suihkonen, and H. Lipsanen, Identifying threading dislocation types in ammonothermally grown bulk α-GaN by confocal Raman 3-D imaging of volumetric stress distribution, J. Cryst. Growth 499, 47 (2018). [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.07.024]

work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.07.024 2018

[55] [55]

S. Onda, H. Watanabe, Y. Kito, H. Kondo, H. Uehigashi, N. Hosokawa, Y. Hisada, K. Shiraishi, and H. Saka, Transmission electron microscope study of a threading dislocation with b=[0001]+[1-100] and its effect on leakage in a 4H-SiC MOSFET, Phil. Mag. Lett. 93, 439 (2013). [DOI:10.1080/09500839.2013.798047]

work page doi:10.1080/09500839.2013.798047 2013

[56] [56]

J. D. Eshelby and A. N. Stroh, CXL. Dislocations in thin plates, Philos. Mag. 42, 1401 (1951). [DOI:10.1080/14786445108560958]

work page doi:10.1080/14786445108560958 1951

[57] [57]

B. G. Mendis and K. J. Hemker, Bloch wave analysis of the Eshelby twist contrast around end- on screw dislocations in bcc Mo, Ultramicroscopy 108, 855 (2008). [DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.005]

work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.005 2008

[58] [58]

Gröger, K

R. Gröger, K. J. Dudeck, P. D. Nellist, V. Vitek, P. B. Hirsch, and D. J. H. Cockayne, Effect of Eshelby twist on core structure of screw dislocations in molybdenum: atomic structure and electron microscope image simulations, Philos. Mag. 91, 2364 (2011). [DOI:10.1080/14786435.2011.562474]

work page doi:10.1080/14786435.2011.562474 2011

[59] [59]

Dudley, X

M. Dudley, X. Huang, and W. Vetter, Contribution of x-ray topography and high-resolution diffraction to the study of defects in SiC, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36, A30 (2003). [DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/36/10a/307]

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/10a/307 2003

[60] [60]

Narayan, Discovery of double helix of screw dislocations: a perspective, Mater

J. Narayan, Discovery of double helix of screw dislocations: a perspective, Mater. Res. Lett. 9, 453 (2021). [DOI:10.1080/21663831.2021.1973131]

work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2021.1973131 2021

[61] [61]

Narayan and R

J. Narayan and R. Narayan, Discovery of double helix and impact on nanoscale to mesoscale crystalline structures, ACS Omega 7, 25853 (2022). [DOI:10.1021/acsomega.2c03501]

work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c03501 2022

[62] [62]

D. B. Williams and C. B. Carter, Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science, Springer Science+Business Media, (2009) p.224-p.226

work page 2009

[63] [63]

Masimov, X-ray extinction changes due to dislocations, J

M. Masimov, X-ray extinction changes due to dislocations, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 990 (2007). [DOI:10.1107/s002188980704174x] 25

work page doi:10.1107/s002188980704174x 2007

[64] [64]

Masimov, Analysis of X-ray extinction due to homogeneously distributed dislocations – Bragg case, Int

M. Masimov, Analysis of X-ray extinction due to homogeneously distributed dislocations – Bragg case, Int. J. Mat. Res. 98, 832 (2007). [DOI:10.3139/146.101533]

work page doi:10.3139/146.101533 2007

[65] [65]

Authier, Optical properties of X-rays – dynamical diffraction, Acta Cryst

A. Authier, Optical properties of X-rays – dynamical diffraction, Acta Cryst. A68, 40 (2012). [DOI:10.1107/S0108767311040219]

work page doi:10.1107/s0108767311040219 2012

[66] [66]

Lider, X-ray diffraction topography methods (Review), Phys

V. Lider, X-ray diffraction topography methods (Review), Phys. Solid State 63, 189 (2021). [DOI:10.1134/s1063783421020141]

work page doi:10.1134/s1063783421020141 2021

[67] [67]

Momma and F

K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011). [DOI:10.1107/S0021889811038970] 26 Table I The values of |g∙b| for TEDs with a a-type ଵ ଷ 〈112ത0〉 Burgers vectors at g1–g5. The directions of Burgers vectors and g-vectors are shown in Fig. 9. |g∙b| g1 g2 g3...

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889811038970 2011