pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.00386 · v2 · pith:O4AQ7RNUnew · submitted 2025-11-01 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el

Conformal Bootstrap with Duality-Inspired Fusion Rule

Yu Nakayama , Toshiki Onagi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords conformal bootstrapfusion rulesKramers-Wannier dualityIsing modelconformal dimensionsoperator product expansionZ2 symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Imposing a duality-inspired selection rule on operator products yields bounds on scalar dimensions from two to seven dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper divides operators in conformal field theories into three sectors according to their behavior under a duality transformation. It imposes a fusion rule that prevents operators from one sector from appearing in the product of two from another sector. This rule is applied specifically to the lowest-lying scalar operators to restrict their possible scaling dimensions across spacetime dimensions from two to seven. The resulting bounds match the known two-dimensional Ising model but exclude the three-dimensional Ising model. This demonstrates how the imposed condition can narrow down the space of possible theories.

Core claim

By classifying operators into a Z2-odd sigma sector and splitting Z2-even operators into an epsilon sector that changes sign under duality and a remaining one sector, and by forbidding the epsilon sector from appearing in the epsilon times epsilon operator product expansion, bounds are obtained on the dimensions of the lowest relevant scalars in dimensions two through seven that correctly allow the two-dimensional Ising model while excluding the three-dimensional Ising model.

What carries the argument

The selection rule forbidding the epsilon sector in the epsilon times epsilon operator product expansion, motivated by Kramers-Wannier duality.

If this is right

  • The bounds accommodate the two-dimensional Ising model.
  • The bounds exclude the three-dimensional Ising model.
  • In two dimensions the bounds show a distinct feature matching the M(8,7) minimal model.
  • In three dimensions the bounds impose a lower limit around 0.85 on the sigma dimension, which applies to candidate theories such as QED3.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sector classification and selection rule could be tested on other known minimal models or lattice models to see if they satisfy the duality constraint.
  • Extending the analysis beyond the lowest scalars to include higher operators might produce tighter bounds in the same dimensions.
  • Similar duality-inspired rules could be applied to constrain critical points in statistical mechanics models that are not pure Ising systems.

Load-bearing premise

The selection rule that forbids the epsilon sector from appearing in the epsilon times epsilon operator product expansion correctly captures the effect of Kramers-Wannier duality on the lowest scalars.

What would settle it

Checking whether the operator product expansion in the three-dimensional Ising model actually contains operators from the epsilon sector when two epsilon-sector operators are multiplied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00386 by Toshiki Onagi, Yu Nakayama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Bootstrap bounds on the (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Bootstrap bounds on the (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a systematic exploration of conformal field theories (CFTs) constrained by duality-inspired fusion rules using the conformal bootstrap. We classify the operator spectrum into three sectors: $[\sigma]$, $[\epsilon]$, and $[1]$. The $[\sigma]$ sector consists of all $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$-odd operators. The $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$-even operators are further divided into the $[\epsilon]$ sector, which contains only the operators that change sign under duality, and the $[1]$ sector, which encompasses all remaining operators. We impose a selection rule motivated by Kramers-Wannier duality, specifically forbidding the appearance of the $[\epsilon]$ sector in the $[\epsilon] \times [\epsilon]$ operator product expansion. By applying this constraint to the lowest-lying relevant scalars, we derive bounds on their conformal dimensions $(\Delta_\sigma, \Delta_\epsilon)$ in dimensions $d=2$ through $d=7$. Our bounds correctly allow the $d=2$ Ising model while excluding the $d=3$ Ising model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the imposed condition. Furthermore, we observe a distinct feature in $d=2$ corresponding to the $\mathcal{M}(8,7)$ minimal model and find non-trivial constraints in $d=3$ ($\Delta_\sigma \gtrsim 0.85$), relevant for theories like QED$_3$. This work opens a new avenue for non-perturbatively probing the landscape of CFTs constrained by fusion rules.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a conformal bootstrap framework that incorporates a duality-inspired selection rule for CFTs. Operators are partitioned into three sectors: [σ] for Z2-odd operators, [ε] for Z2-even operators that change sign under duality, and [1] for the remaining Z2-even operators. A selection rule forbidding the [ε] sector in the [ε] × [ε] OPE is imposed, motivated by Kramers-Wannier duality. This constraint is applied to the lowest-lying relevant scalars to obtain bounds on (Δ_σ, Δ_ε) in spacetime dimensions d=2 through d=7. The resulting bounds include the d=2 Ising model, exclude the d=3 Ising model, exhibit a feature corresponding to the M(8,7) minimal model in d=2, and yield non-trivial constraints in d=3 relevant to theories such as QED3.

Significance. If the numerical bounds prove robust, the work supplies a new avenue for constraining CFT spectra via externally motivated fusion rules rather than purely internal bootstrap assumptions. The reproduction of the known d=2 Ising point provides a non-trivial consistency check. The d=3 bounds (Δ_σ ≳ 0.85) and exclusion of the 3d Ising point could have implications for models like QED3, though their significance depends on confirming that the exclusion is not an artifact of the truncation to lowest-lying scalars.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on classification and selection rule: The central claim that the imposed condition excludes the d=3 Ising point (Δ_σ≈0.518, Δ_ε≈1.412) while allowing the d=2 Ising model rests on applying the [ε]-forbidding rule only to the lowest-lying relevant scalars. The manuscript must demonstrate that this exclusion persists when the next primary or descendant in the [ε] or [1] sector is restored to the OPEs; otherwise the result is truncation-dependent and does not yet establish the rule's constraining power.
  2. [Numerical results] Numerical results section: No truncation details, error analysis, or stability checks against additional operators are described. These are required to verify that the reported bounds in d=2–7 are free of numerical artifacts and that the d=3 exclusion is a genuine consequence of the duality-inspired selection rule.
minor comments (2)
  1. The sector notation [σ], [ε], [1] is introduced clearly but would benefit from an explicit table listing the operator content and quantum numbers assigned to each sector.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'non-trivial constraints in d=3 (Δ_σ ≳ 0.85)' relevant for QED3; a brief comparison to existing bootstrap bounds without the duality rule would help quantify the additional constraining power.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and commit to revisions that strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on classification and selection rule: The central claim that the imposed condition excludes the d=3 Ising point (Δ_σ≈0.518, Δ_ε≈1.412) while allowing the d=2 Ising model rests on applying the [ε]-forbidding rule only to the lowest-lying relevant scalars. The manuscript must demonstrate that this exclusion persists when the next primary or descendant in the [ε] or [1] sector is restored to the OPEs; otherwise the result is truncation-dependent and does not yet establish the rule's constraining power.

    Authors: We agree that the robustness of the d=3 exclusion against truncation must be explicitly verified to establish the constraining power of the duality-inspired selection rule. Our current analysis applies the rule to the lowest-lying relevant scalars as an initial demonstration. In the revised manuscript we will add results for d=3 that include the next scalar primary in the [ε] sector (and check the effect of the first descendant in the [1] sector), showing that the exclusion of the 3d Ising point persists. These checks will be presented in the numerical results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results] Numerical results section: No truncation details, error analysis, or stability checks against additional operators are described. These are required to verify that the reported bounds in d=2–7 are free of numerical artifacts and that the d=3 exclusion is a genuine consequence of the duality-inspired selection rule.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission of these technical details in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to the Numerical results section that specifies the truncation scheme (number of operators kept in each sector), provides an error analysis based on convergence with increasing cutoff, and reports stability tests under addition of further operators. These additions will confirm that the reported bounds, including the d=3 exclusion, are not numerical artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bounds follow from imposed external selection rule via standard bootstrap

full rationale

The paper explicitly defines the three sectors and imposes a selection rule forbidding the [ε] sector in [ε]×[ε] OPE, motivated by Kramers-Wannier duality rather than derived from the bootstrap equations themselves. It then applies this fixed constraint to the lowest scalars and solves the resulting truncated crossing equations numerically to obtain dimension bounds. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input or self-citation by construction; the d=2 allowance and d=3 exclusion are direct consequences of the externally motivated rule under the truncation, not tautological redefinitions. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the Kramers-Wannier duality can be faithfully encoded as a selection rule on the lowest scalars and that the numerical bootstrap implementation converges to the reported bounds.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Kramers-Wannier duality implies the selection rule that forbids the [ε] sector from appearing in the [ε] × [ε] OPE for the lowest-lying scalars.
    Stated in the abstract as the motivation for the imposed constraint.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5795 in / 1371 out tokens · 114734 ms · 2026-05-21T19:39:05.362344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and references therein for lattice studies). Assum- ing such a theory possesses aU(1) flavor symmetry (or a discreteZ n subgroup thereof,n≥6), we can iden- tify the lowest-dimension scalar operators transforming with chargesq= 1 andq= 2. In many candidate theo- ries, these correspond schematically to a fermion bilinear σ∼ψψ+ ¯ψ ¯ψ(charge 1) and a four-fer...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B59, 135 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criti- cality: An Explanation of 1/f noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 381 (1987)

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two- dimensional ferromagnet. Part 1., Phys. Rev.60, 252 (1941)

    work page 1941

  5. [5]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the Two- Dimensional Ferromagnet. Part II, Phys. Rev.60, 263 (1941)

    work page 1941

  6. [6]

    Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 070601 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0404051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model, J. Phys. A49, 354001 (2016), arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, JHEP03, 189, arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier- like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 111601 (2022), arXiv:2111.01141 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D86, 025022 (2012), arXiv:1203.6064 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrap- ping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model, JHEP11, 109, arXiv:1406.4858 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin, A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap, JHEP06, 174, arXiv:1502.02033 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Bootstrapping the Three-Dimensional Supersymmetric Ising Model

    N. Bobev, S. El-Showk, D. Mazac, and M. F. Pau- los, Bootstrapping the Three-Dimensional Supersymmet- ric Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 051601 (2015), arXiv:1502.04124 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision Islands in the Ising andO(N) Models, JHEP 08, 036, arXiv:1603.04436 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT

    D. Simmons-Duffin, The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, JHEP03, 086, arXiv:1612.08471 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap

    A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap, JHEP02, 164, arXiv:1708.05718 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Behan, Unitary subsector of generalized minimal mod- els, Phys

    C. Behan, Unitary subsector of generalized minimal mod- els, Phys. Rev. D97, 094020 (2018), arXiv:1712.06622 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, W. Landry, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, blocks 3d: soft- ware for general 3d conformal blocks, JHEP11, 006, arXiv:2011.01959 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Reehorst, S

    M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, B. Sirois, N. Su, and B. van Rees, Navigator Function for the Conformal Bootstrap, SciPost Phys.11, 072 (2021), arXiv:2104.09518 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant opera- tors in the 3d Ising model CFT, JHEP09, 177, arXiv:2111.12093 [hep-th]

    M. Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant opera- tors in the 3d Ising model CFT, JHEP09, 177, arXiv:2111.12093 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Su, The Hybrid Bootstrap (2022), arXiv:2202.07607 [hep-th]

    N. Su, The Hybrid Bootstrap (2022), arXiv:2202.07607 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Non-Abelian cur- rents bootstrap, JHEP03, 175, arXiv:2302.11585 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Chang, V

    C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor, JHEP03, 136, arXiv:2411.15300 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin, The Conformal Bootstrap, inTheo- retical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings(2017) pp. 1–74, arXiv:1602.07982 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The Confor- mal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015002 (2019), arXiv:1805.04405 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    S. M. Chester, Weizmann lectures on the numeri- cal conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rept.1045, 1 (2023), arXiv:1907.05147 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Bounds in 4D Conformal Field Theories with Global Symmetry

    R. Rattazzi, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, Bounds in 4D Conformal Field Theories with Global Symmetry, J. Phys. A44, 035402 (2011), arXiv:1009.5985 [hep-th]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Boot- strapping theO(N) vector models, JHEP06, 091, arXiv:1307.6856 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Bounds on $\mathcal{N}=1$ Superconformal Theories with Global Symmetries

    M. Berkooz, R. Yacoby, and A. Zait, Bounds on N= 1 superconformal theories with global symme- tries, JHEP08, 008, [Erratum: JHEP 01, 132 (2015)], arXiv:1402.6068 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Approaching conformal window of $O(n)\times O(m)$ symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models from conformal bootstrap

    Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Approaching the confor- mal window ofO(n)×O(m) symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models using the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D89, 126009 (2014), arXiv:1404.0489 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Five dimensional $O(N)$-symmetric CFTs from conformal bootstrap

    Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Five dimensionalO(N)- symmetric CFTs from conformal bootstrap, Phys. Lett. B734, 193 (2014), arXiv:1404.5201 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Bounds on OPE Coefficients in 4D Conformal Field Theories

    F. Caracciolo, A. Castedo Echeverri, B. von Harling, and M. Serone, Bounds on OPE Coefficients in 4D Conformal Field Theories, JHEP10, 020, arXiv:1406.7845 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Bootstrapping phase transitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems

    Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Bootstrapping phase tran- sitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems, Phys. Rev. D91, 021901 (2015), arXiv:1407.6195 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Conformal Bootstrap Approach to O(N) Fixed Points in Five Dimensions

    J.-B. Bae and S.-J. Rey, Conformal Bootstrap Approach to O(N) Fixed Points in Five Dimensions, (2014), arXiv:1412.6549 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and R. Yacoby, Bootstrapping O(N) vector models in 4< d <6, Phys. Rev. D91, 086014 (2015), arXiv:1412.7746 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago, JHEP11, 106, arXiv:1504.07997 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    S. M. Chester, L. V. Iliesiu, S. S. Pufu, and R. Yacoby, BootstrappingO(N) Vector Models with Four Super- charges in 3≤d≤4, JHEP05, 103, arXiv:1511.07552 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the Five Dimensional Critical O(N) Models

    Z. Li and N. Su, Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the Five Dimensional Critical O(N) Models, JHEP04, 098, arXiv:1607.07077 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Bootstrap experiments on higher dimensional CFTs

    Y. Nakayama, Bootstrap experiments on higher dimen- sional CFTs, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1850036 (2018), arXiv:1705.02744 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Bootstrapping 3D Fermions with Global Symmetries

    L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S. S. Pufu, and D. Simmons- Duffin, Bootstrapping 3D Fermions with Global Symme- tries, JHEP01, 036, arXiv:1705.03484 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Li and N

    Z. Li and N. Su, 3D CFT Archipelago from Single Cor- relator Bootstrap, Phys. Lett. B797, 134920 (2019), arXiv:1706.06960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Bootstrapping hypercubic and hypertetrahedral theories in three dimensions

    A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping hypercubic and hypertetra- hedral theories in three dimensions, JHEP05, 035, arXiv:1801.07127 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories, Sci- Post Phys.6, 035 (2019), arXiv:1810.10015 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Stergiou, Bootstrapping MN and Tetragonal CFTs in Three Dimensions, SciPost Phys.7, 010 (2019), arXiv:1904.00017 [hep-th]

    A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping MN and Tetragonal CFTs in Three Dimensions, SciPost Phys.7, 010 (2019), arXiv:1904.00017 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories II, Sci- Post Phys.8, 085 (2020), arXiv:1911.00522 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Reehorst, E

    M. Reehorst, E. Trevisani, and A. Vichi, Mixed Scalar- Current bootstrap in three dimensions, JHEP12, 156, arXiv:1911.05747 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1911

  47. [47]

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Carving out OPE space and preciseO(2) model critical exponents, JHEP06, 142, arXiv:1912.03324 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1912

  48. [48]

    Nakayama, Exclusion Inside or at the Border of Con- formal Bootstrap Continent, Int

    Y. Nakayama, Exclusion Inside or at the Border of Con- formal Bootstrap Continent, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050036 (2020), arXiv:1912.11748 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Henriksson, S

    J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and A. Stergiou, Analytic and Numerical Bootstrap of CFTs withO(m)×O(n) Global Symmetry in 3D, SciPost Phys.9, 035 (2020), arXiv:2004.14388 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Li and D

    Z. Li and D. Poland, Searching for gauge theo- ries with the conformal bootstrap, JHEP03, 172, arXiv:2005.01721 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2005

  51. [51]

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, Non-Wilson-Fisher kinks ofO(N) numerical bootstrap: from the deconfined phase transition to a putative new family of CFTs, SciPost Phys.10, 115 (2021), arXiv:2005.04250 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping Heisenberg magnets and their cubic instability, Phys. Rev. D104, 105013 (2021), arXiv:2011.14647 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Reehorst, M

    M. Reehorst, M. Refinetti, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping traceless symmetricO(N) scalars, SciPost Phys.14, 068 (2023), arXiv:2012.08533 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Manenti and A

    A. Manenti and A. Vichi, ExploringSU(N) adjoint cor- relators in 3d, (2021), arXiv:2101.07318 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Ghosh, A

    K. Ghosh, A. Kaviraj, and M. F. Paulos, Charging up the functional bootstrap, JHEP10, 116, arXiv:2107.00041 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Baume and C

    F. Baume and C. Lawrie, Bootstrapping (D, D) con- formal matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 046006 (2022), arXiv:2111.02453 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Sirois, Navigating through the O(N) archipelago, Sci- Post Phys.13, 081 (2022), arXiv:2203.11597 [hep-th]

    B. Sirois, Navigating through the O(N) archipelago, Sci- Post Phys.13, 081 (2022), arXiv:2203.11597 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Gross-Neveu- Yukawa archipelago, JHEP02, 036, arXiv:2210.02492 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    S. M. Chester and N. Su, Upper critical dimension of the 3-state Potts model, Phys. Rev. D111, L121701 (2025), arXiv:2210.09091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Nakayama, Who told you magnetization is a vector in 4−ϵdimensions?, Int

    Y. Nakayama, Who told you magnetization is a vector in 4−ϵdimensions?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40, 2550041 (2025), arXiv:2404.14669 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Reehorst, S

    M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, B. Sirois, and B. C. van Rees, Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiral O(N)×O(2) universality class, SciPost Phys.18, 060 (2025), arXiv:2405.19411 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Bartlett-Tisdall, C

    S. Bartlett-Tisdall, C. P. Herzog, and V. Schaub, An At- las for 3d conformal field theories with a U(1) global sym- metry, JHEP06, 237, arXiv:2412.01608 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, Redundancy Channels in the Conformal Bootstrap, (2025), arXiv:2507.05338 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    S. M. Chester, A. Piazza, M. Reehorst, and N. Su, Bootstrapping the Simplest Deconfined Quantum Crit- ical Point, (2025), arXiv:2507.06283 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Lin and S.-H

    Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, Bootstrapping noninvert- ible symmetries, Phys. Rev. D107, 125025 (2023), arXiv:2302.13900 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12, 031, arXiv:0807.0004 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Su, simpleboot: A Mathematica framework for bootstrap calculations,https://gitlab.com/ bootstrapcollaboration/simpleboot(2019)

    N. Su, simpleboot: A Mathematica framework for bootstrap calculations,https://gitlab.com/ bootstrapcollaboration/simpleboot(2019). 8

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Landry and D

    W. Landry and D. Simmons-Duffin, Scaling the semidef- inite program solver SDPB (2019), arXiv:1909.09745 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Ohtsuki, “CBoot: A sage module to create (con- volved) conformal block tables,https://github.com/ tohtsky/cboot(2016)

    T. Ohtsuki, “CBoot: A sage module to create (con- volved) conformal block tables,https://github.com/ tohtsky/cboot(2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Behan, PyCFTBoot: A flexible interface for the con- formal bootstrap, Commun

    C. Behan, PyCFTBoot: A flexible interface for the con- formal bootstrap, Commun. Comput. Phys.22, 1 (2017), arXiv:1602.02810 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Su, Tutorial 4a: Navigator and efm examples,https: //pirsa.org/23040146(2023)

    N. Su, Tutorial 4a: Navigator and efm examples,https: //pirsa.org/23040146(2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFT_d

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, The Boot- strap Program for Boundary CFT d, JHEP07, 113, arXiv:1210.4258 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Conformal Field Theories in Fractional Dimensions

    S. El-Showk, M. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Conformal Field The- ories in Fractional Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 141601 (2014), arXiv:1309.5089 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-Duality of Boundary Con- ditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13, 721 (2009), arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  75. [75]

    Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N = 4 gauge theories

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, and A. Zaffaroni, Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N= 4 gauge theories, JHEP01, 005, arXiv:1309.2657 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    On the stability of U(1) spin liquids in two dimensions

    M. Hermele, T. Senthil, M. P. A. Fisher, P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability of U (1) spin liq- uids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B70, 214437 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0404751 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  77. [77]

    E. Dyer, M. Mezei, and S. S. Pufu, Monopole taxon- omy in three-dimensional conformal field theories (2013), arXiv:1309.1160 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    Aartset al., Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo- Dynamics, Prog

    G. Aartset al., Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo- Dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.133, 104070 (2023), arXiv:2301.04382 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Kaidi, Y

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Y. Zhang, On a class of selection rules without group actions in field the- ory and string theory, SciPost Phys.17, 169 (2024), arXiv:2402.00105 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. Garc´ ıa-Sep´ ulveda, and N. Holfester, Particle-soliton degeneracies from spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetry, JHEP07, 154, arXiv:2403.08883 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.