Several kinds of Gaussian quantum channels related to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering

Ruifen Ma; Xiaofei Qi; Yanjing Sun

arxiv: 2511.05003 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Several kinds of Gaussian quantum channels related to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering

Ruifen Ma , Yanjing Sun , Xiaofei Qi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

keywords Gaussian channelsquantum steeringEPR steeringsteering-annihilating channelssteering-breaking channelsunsteerable channelssuperchannelscontinuous-variable systems

0 comments

The pith

Gaussian channels fall into four classes based on how they affect EPR steering, with necessary and sufficient conditions derived for each.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines Gaussian steering-annihilating channels, Gaussian steering-breaking channels, Gaussian unsteerable channels, and maximal Gaussian unsteerable channels. It supplies the necessary and sufficient conditions that place a given Gaussian channel into one of these classes and maps out the relationships that hold among the classes. The analysis also characterizes the structure of Gaussian unsteerable superchannels and their maximal versions, which supply the free operations needed to quantify steering resources in continuous-variable systems.

Core claim

We give the concepts of these channels, derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for a Gaussian channel to belong to each class, and explore the intrinsic relationships among them. Additionally, we also provide a detailed characterization of Gaussian unsteerable superchannels and maximal Gaussian unsteerable superchannels.

What carries the argument

Necessary and sufficient conditions on the Gaussian channel parameters that determine whether the channel annihilates, breaks, or preserves steering.

If this is right

A channel that meets the condition for steering-annihilating must map every steerable Gaussian state to an unsteerable one.
Steering-breaking channels form a larger class that includes all steering-annihilating channels.
Unsteerable channels leave the unsteerability of any input state unchanged.
The maximal unsteerable channels are the extremal members of the unsteerable class and bound the set of free operations for steering quantification.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same conditions may supply practical criteria for choosing which channel to use when a protocol must either protect or eliminate steering.
Extending the classification beyond the Gaussian regime would test whether the same inclusion relations survive when non-Gaussian states are allowed.
The superchannel characterization could be used to define a resource monotone that quantifies the steering capability of any Gaussian channel.

Load-bearing premise

Steering and channel properties can be fully captured by Gaussian states and operations in continuous-variable systems.

What would settle it

A concrete Gaussian channel whose covariance-matrix transformation violates one of the stated necessary and sufficient conditions while still mapping some steerable input state to an unsteerable output state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.05003 by Ruifen Ma, Xiaofei Qi, Yanjing Sun.

read the original abstract

Quantum steering is a crucial quantum resource that lies intermediate between entanglement and Bell nonlocality. Gaussian channels, meanwhile, play a foundational role in diverse quantum protocols, secure communication, and related fields. In this paper, we focus on several classes of Gaussian channels associated with quantum steering: Gaussian steering-annihilating channels, Gaussian steering-breaking channels, Gaussian unsteerable channels, and maximal Gaussian unsteerable channels. We give the concepts of these channels, derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for a Gaussian channel to belong to each class, and explore the intrinsic relationships among them. Additionally, since quantifying the steering capability of Gaussian channels in continuous-variable systems requires an understanding of the structure of free superchannels, we also provide a detailed characterization of Gaussian unsteerable superchannels and maximal Gaussian unsteerable superchannels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper classifies Gaussian channels by steering effects with derived conditions that hold up inside the standard covariance formalism.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper defines four classes of Gaussian channels—steering-annihilating, steering-breaking, unsteerable, and maximal unsteerable—and supplies necessary and sufficient conditions for each based on covariance matrix properties. It also works out the inclusion relations and extends the analysis to unsteerable superchannels. The contribution is the concrete characterizations inside the Gaussian framework. The authors use the usual symplectic matrix and positive-semidefinite covariance setup to pin down when a channel destroys or preserves steering, which fits neatly with prior work on Gaussian states. This kind of classification can be handy for sorting channels in continuous-variable protocols. The math looks consistent with no evident gaps or circular steps. The only real boundary is the Gaussian restriction itself, which means the results do not cover non-Gaussian operations or states. That keeps the scope manageable rather than indicating a problem. This work is for people already working in continuous-variable quantum information and steering resource theory. A reader who needs precise conditions for channel design or superchannel analysis will find it relevant. It is solid enough to go to a serious referee for feedback on the derivations and possible extensions. I would recommend sending it for peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces and defines four classes of Gaussian quantum channels related to EPR steering—Gaussian steering-annihilating channels, Gaussian steering-breaking channels, Gaussian unsteerable channels, and maximal Gaussian unsteerable channels—along with Gaussian unsteerable superchannels and maximal Gaussian unsteerable superchannels. It derives necessary and sufficient conditions for membership in each class using covariance-matrix representations of Gaussian states and channels, explores inclusion relations among the classes, and provides characterizations of the corresponding superchannels.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work contributes to resource theories of steering in continuous-variable systems by supplying explicit, checkable conditions that classify channels according to their steering-preserving or steering-destroying properties. The characterization of unsteerable superchannels is a useful addition for identifying free operations when quantifying steering. The reliance on standard symplectic and positive-semidefinite covariance-matrix formalism is a strength, as it yields concrete, verifiable criteria rather than abstract existence statements.

major comments (2)

[§3.1] §3.1, covariance-matrix condition for steering-annihilating channels: the necessity direction assumes that every steerable Gaussian state can be reduced to a canonical form with fixed symplectic invariants; an explicit counter-example or additional constraint is needed to confirm this covers all two-mode cases without loss of generality.
[§4.2] §4.2, hierarchy of inclusion relations: the claim that every maximal unsteerable channel is steering-breaking is load-bearing for the overall classification; the proof sketch relies on the positivity of the partial transpose after the channel action, but the boundary case where the smallest eigenvalue is exactly zero is not explicitly treated.

minor comments (3)

[§2] Notation for the covariance matrix V and the channel matrix X, Y should be introduced once in §2 and used consistently; occasional redefinition of symbols in later sections reduces readability.
[Figure 1] Figure 1 (schematic of channel classes) would benefit from explicit labels on the arrows indicating the inclusion relations derived in §4.
[§5.3] The characterization of maximal unsteerable superchannels in §5.3 lists three equivalent conditions; adding a short remark on computational complexity of checking them would help readers interested in applications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.1] §3.1, covariance-matrix condition for steering-annihilating channels: the necessity direction assumes that every steerable Gaussian state can be reduced to a canonical form with fixed symplectic invariants; an explicit counter-example or additional constraint is needed to confirm this covers all two-mode cases without loss of generality.

Authors: In §3.1 the necessity direction for the covariance-matrix condition on steering-annihilating channels employs the standard reduction of two-mode Gaussian states to canonical form via local symplectic transformations. These transformations preserve the relevant symplectic invariants and the steerability properties encoded in the covariance matrix, so the reduction holds without loss of generality for all two-mode cases. To make this justification fully explicit, we will insert a short clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript that recalls the normal-form result from the Gaussian-state literature and confirms that no additional constraint is required. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2, hierarchy of inclusion relations: the claim that every maximal unsteerable channel is steering-breaking is load-bearing for the overall classification; the proof sketch relies on the positivity of the partial transpose after the channel action, but the boundary case where the smallest eigenvalue is exactly zero is not explicitly treated.

Authors: The inclusion proof in §4.2 shows that the output covariance matrix satisfies the PPT criterion, which for Gaussian states is equivalent to unsteerability. When the smallest eigenvalue of the partially transposed matrix is exactly zero, the state lies on the boundary and remains unsteerable (steering requires a strict violation). The classification therefore continues to hold. We will nevertheless add an explicit sentence treating this boundary case in the revised version to remove any ambiguity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rely on standard Gaussian covariance constraints

full rationale

The paper defines Gaussian steering-annihilating, steering-breaking, unsteerable, and maximal unsteerable channels, then derives necessary and sufficient conditions on their covariance-matrix parameters using symplectic transformations and positive-semidefinite constraints. These conditions follow directly from the definitions of steering and Gaussian maps without reducing any claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted input or self-citation chain. Characterization of the corresponding superchannels proceeds identically from the same formalism. All steps remain inside externally verifiable quantum-information mathematics with no load-bearing self-referential step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 4 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions about Gaussian quantum states and channels in continuous-variable systems; no free parameters or invented physical entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Gaussian states and channels form a closed set under the operations considered for steering analysis in continuous-variable quantum systems.
The paper restricts focus to Gaussian quantum channels and steering, invoking this as the regime for all derivations.

invented entities (4)

Gaussian steering-annihilating channels no independent evidence
purpose: Classify channels that completely destroy steering capability
Newly defined class in the paper with no independent evidence provided beyond the definition.
Gaussian steering-breaking channels no independent evidence
purpose: Classify channels that break steering under specific conditions
Newly defined class in the paper with no independent evidence provided beyond the definition.
Gaussian unsteerable channels no independent evidence
purpose: Classify channels that result in unsteerable states
Newly defined class in the paper with no independent evidence provided beyond the definition.
maximal Gaussian unsteerable channels no independent evidence
purpose: Classify the strongest form of unsteerable channels
Newly defined class in the paper with no independent evidence provided beyond the definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1453 out tokens · 98375 ms · 2026-05-18T00:30:08.008584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We give the concepts of these channels, derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for a Gaussian channel to belong to each class... via covariance-matrix representations
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Gaussian unsteerable channels... M + (0_{2m} ⊕ iΩ_n) − K(0_{2m} ⊕ iΩ_n)Kᵀ ≥ 0

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Einstein, B

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum- mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

work page 1935
[2]

Schr¨odinger, Discussion of probability relations be- tween separated systems, Proc

E. Schr¨odinger, Discussion of probability relations be- tween separated systems, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 31, 555-563 (1935)

work page 1935
[3]

Branciard, E

C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman, One-sided device-independent 9 quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering, Phys. Rev. A 85, 010301(R) (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

M. D. Reid, Signifying quantum benchmarks for qubit teleportation and secure quantum communication us- ing Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062338 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Q. He, L. Rosales-Zarate, G. Adesso, M. D. Reid, Secure continuous variable teleportation and Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen steering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180502 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

S. L. Braunstein, P. Van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

work page 2005
[7]

Weedbrook, S

C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N.J. Cerf, T.C. Ralph, J.H. Shapiro, S. Lloyd, Gaussian quan- tum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 621–669,

work page 2012
[8]

Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017

A. Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017

work page 2017
[9]

S.-W. Ji, J. Lee, J. Y. Park, Steering criteria via covariance matrices of local observables in arbitrary- dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 062130 (2015)

work page 2015
[10]

Kogias, P

I. Kogias, P. Skrzypczyk, and G. Adesso, Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 210401 (2015)

work page 2015
[11]

Kogias, A

I. Kogias, A. R. Lee, S. Ragy, and G. Adesso, Quantifi- cation of Gaussian Quantum Steering Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060403 (2015)

work page 2015
[12]

Zhou, G.Q

B.Y. Zhou, G.Q. Yang, and G. X. Li, Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen steering and entanglement based on two-photon correlation for bipartite Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. A. 99, 062101 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

R. Y. Teh, M. Gessner, M. D. Reid, and M. Fadel, Full multipartite steering inseparability, genuine multipartite steering, and monogamy for continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012202 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Mihaescu, H

T. Mihaescu, H. Kampermann, A. Isar and D.Bruß, Steering witnesses for unknown Gaussian quantum states, New J. Phys. 25 113023 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

Barasi´nski, J

A. Barasi´nski, J. P. Jr., A. ˘Cernoch, Quantification of Quantum Correlations in Two-Beam Gaussian States Us- ing Photon-Number Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043603 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

T. T. Yan, J. Guo, J. C. Hou, X. F. Qi, Gaussian unsteer- able channels and computable quantifications of Gaus- sian steering, Phys. Rev. A, 110, 052427 (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

C. H. Bennett, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin and A. V. Thap- liyal, Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum chan- nel and the reverse Shannon theorem, IEEE Trans. In- form. Theory 48, 2637 (2002)

work page 2002
[18]

M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, G. Giedke, Quantum Ca- pacities of Bosonic Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 130501 (2007)

work page 2007
[19]

Caruso, J

F. Caruso, J. Eisert, V. Giovannetti, A.S. Holevo, Multi- mode bosonic Gaussian channels, New Journal of Physics 10, 083030 (2008)

work page 2008
[20]

C. M. Caves, P. D. Drummond, Quantum limits on bosonic communication rates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 481(1994)

work page 1994
[21]

Navasu´ es, F

M. Navasu´ es, F. Grosshans and A. Ac´ ın, Optimality of Gaussian Attacks in Continuous-Variable Quantum Cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97,190502 (2006)

work page 2006
[22]

Labidi, C

W. Labidi, C. Deppe, Secure Identification for Multi- antenna Gaussian Channels, Information Theory and Re- lated Fields, 397-423(2025)

work page 2025
[23]

G. D. Palma, A. Mari, V. Giovannetti, A. S. Holevo. Nor- mal form decomposition for Gaussian-to-Gaussian super- operators. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56, 052202 (2015)

work page 2015
[24]

S.B¨auml, S. Das, X. Wang, and M. M. Wilde, Resource theory of entanglement for bipartite quantum channels, arXiv:1907.04181

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
[25]

Mani , V

A. Mani , V. Karimipour, Cohering and decohering power of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 032331 (2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Xu, Coherence of quantum channels, Phys

J. Xu, Coherence of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052311 (2019)

work page 2019
[27]

C Liu, X

Y. C Liu, X. Yuan, Operational resource theory of quan- tum channels, Phys. Rev. A, 2, 012035(R) (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

J. W. Xu, Coherence of quantum Gaussian channels, Phys. Lett. A 387, 127028(2021)

work page 2021
[29]

H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty, Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen Paradox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007)

work page 2007
[30]

Zhang, The Schur Complement and its Applications (Springer), 2005

F. Zhang, The Schur Complement and its Applications (Springer), 2005

work page 2005
[31]

Giedke, J

G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, Characterization of Gaussian op- erations and distillation of Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 032316 (2002)

work page 2002

[1] [1]

Einstein, B

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum- mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

work page 1935

[2] [2]

Schr¨odinger, Discussion of probability relations be- tween separated systems, Proc

E. Schr¨odinger, Discussion of probability relations be- tween separated systems, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 31, 555-563 (1935)

work page 1935

[3] [3]

Branciard, E

C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman, One-sided device-independent 9 quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering, Phys. Rev. A 85, 010301(R) (2012)

work page 2012

[4] [4]

M. D. Reid, Signifying quantum benchmarks for qubit teleportation and secure quantum communication us- ing Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062338 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [5]

Q. He, L. Rosales-Zarate, G. Adesso, M. D. Reid, Secure continuous variable teleportation and Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen steering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180502 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

S. L. Braunstein, P. Van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

work page 2005

[7] [7]

Weedbrook, S

C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N.J. Cerf, T.C. Ralph, J.H. Shapiro, S. Lloyd, Gaussian quan- tum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 621–669,

work page 2012

[8] [8]

Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017

A. Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017

work page 2017

[9] [9]

S.-W. Ji, J. Lee, J. Y. Park, Steering criteria via covariance matrices of local observables in arbitrary- dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 062130 (2015)

work page 2015

[10] [10]

Kogias, P

I. Kogias, P. Skrzypczyk, and G. Adesso, Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 210401 (2015)

work page 2015

[11] [11]

Kogias, A

I. Kogias, A. R. Lee, S. Ragy, and G. Adesso, Quantifi- cation of Gaussian Quantum Steering Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060403 (2015)

work page 2015

[12] [12]

Zhou, G.Q

B.Y. Zhou, G.Q. Yang, and G. X. Li, Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen steering and entanglement based on two-photon correlation for bipartite Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. A. 99, 062101 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

R. Y. Teh, M. Gessner, M. D. Reid, and M. Fadel, Full multipartite steering inseparability, genuine multipartite steering, and monogamy for continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012202 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Mihaescu, H

T. Mihaescu, H. Kampermann, A. Isar and D.Bruß, Steering witnesses for unknown Gaussian quantum states, New J. Phys. 25 113023 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

Barasi´nski, J

A. Barasi´nski, J. P. Jr., A. ˘Cernoch, Quantification of Quantum Correlations in Two-Beam Gaussian States Us- ing Photon-Number Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043603 (2023)

work page 2023

[16] [16]

T. T. Yan, J. Guo, J. C. Hou, X. F. Qi, Gaussian unsteer- able channels and computable quantifications of Gaus- sian steering, Phys. Rev. A, 110, 052427 (2024)

work page 2024

[17] [17]

C. H. Bennett, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin and A. V. Thap- liyal, Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum chan- nel and the reverse Shannon theorem, IEEE Trans. In- form. Theory 48, 2637 (2002)

work page 2002

[18] [18]

M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, G. Giedke, Quantum Ca- pacities of Bosonic Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 130501 (2007)

work page 2007

[19] [19]

Caruso, J

F. Caruso, J. Eisert, V. Giovannetti, A.S. Holevo, Multi- mode bosonic Gaussian channels, New Journal of Physics 10, 083030 (2008)

work page 2008

[20] [20]

C. M. Caves, P. D. Drummond, Quantum limits on bosonic communication rates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 481(1994)

work page 1994

[21] [21]

Navasu´ es, F

M. Navasu´ es, F. Grosshans and A. Ac´ ın, Optimality of Gaussian Attacks in Continuous-Variable Quantum Cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97,190502 (2006)

work page 2006

[22] [22]

Labidi, C

W. Labidi, C. Deppe, Secure Identification for Multi- antenna Gaussian Channels, Information Theory and Re- lated Fields, 397-423(2025)

work page 2025

[23] [23]

G. D. Palma, A. Mari, V. Giovannetti, A. S. Holevo. Nor- mal form decomposition for Gaussian-to-Gaussian super- operators. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56, 052202 (2015)

work page 2015

[24] [24]

S.B¨auml, S. Das, X. Wang, and M. M. Wilde, Resource theory of entanglement for bipartite quantum channels, arXiv:1907.04181

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

[25] [25]

Mani , V

A. Mani , V. Karimipour, Cohering and decohering power of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 032331 (2015)

work page 2015

[26] [26]

Xu, Coherence of quantum channels, Phys

J. Xu, Coherence of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052311 (2019)

work page 2019

[27] [27]

C Liu, X

Y. C Liu, X. Yuan, Operational resource theory of quan- tum channels, Phys. Rev. A, 2, 012035(R) (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

J. W. Xu, Coherence of quantum Gaussian channels, Phys. Lett. A 387, 127028(2021)

work page 2021

[29] [29]

H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty, Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen Paradox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007)

work page 2007

[30] [30]

Zhang, The Schur Complement and its Applications (Springer), 2005

F. Zhang, The Schur Complement and its Applications (Springer), 2005

work page 2005

[31] [31]

Giedke, J

G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, Characterization of Gaussian op- erations and distillation of Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 032316 (2002)

work page 2002