pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.15148 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Radial Fast Entangling Gates Under Micromotion in Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers

Phoebe Grosser , Monica Gutierrez Galan , Isabelle Savill-Brown , Alexander K. Ratcliffe , Haonan Liu , Varun D. Vaidya , Simon A. Haine , C. Ricardo Viteri
show 2 more authors
Joseph J. Hope Zain Mehdi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords trapped ionsentangling gatesmicromotionradial modesfast quantum gatesquantum controlion traphigh-fidelity gates
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Micromotion can be used to design high-fidelity entangling gates on radial modes in hundreds of nanoseconds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that micromotion in radio-frequency ion traps, usually minimized because it disrupts quantum gates, can instead be incorporated into control designs to enable fast entangling operations. For a two-ion crystal, the authors identify sequences that exploit the radial modes and reach high fidelity with gate times from hundreds of nanoseconds to a few microseconds, especially in the sub-trap-period regime. They trace the physical reason the effect helps and check how noise sources affect the final error. A reader would care because shorter gate durations directly reduce the window for decoherence, allowing more complex computations before errors dominate.

Core claim

By incorporating the deterministic micromotion into quantum control frameworks, high-fidelity entangling gates can be realized on the radial modes of a two-ion crystal, with operation times ranging from hundreds of nanoseconds to microseconds and particularly effective in the sub-trap-period regime.

What carries the argument

Control sequences designed to include and exploit micromotion in the radial modes of a two-ion crystal.

If this is right

  • High-fidelity entangling gates become feasible at timescales of hundreds of nanoseconds using radial modes.
  • The physical origin of the micromotion benefit is identified through analysis of the control solutions.
  • Gate error remains manageable when laser intensity fluctuations, trap-voltage noise, and positioning errors are included at laboratory levels.
  • Radial modes, previously avoided due to micromotion, can now support fast operations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same incorporation of micromotion could be tested on chains with more than two ions to check scalability.
  • Trap designs that deliberately engineer rather than suppress micromotion might become advantageous.
  • Direct experimental comparison of these radial gates with conventional axial-mode gates would quantify the speed advantage.

Load-bearing premise

Micromotion can be modeled accurately enough that the resulting control sequences stay robust when real laboratory imperfections such as laser fluctuations and trap voltage noise are added.

What would settle it

An experiment that applies one of the identified sequences to radial modes and measures whether the achieved gate fidelity matches the predicted high value or falls well below it under typical lab noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.15148 by Alexander K. Ratcliffe, C. Ricardo Viteri, Haonan Liu, Isabelle Savill-Brown, Joseph J. Hope, Monica Gutierrez Galan, Phoebe Grosser, Simon A. Haine, Varun D. Vaidya, Zain Mehdi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Impulsive fast two-qubit gates using the transverse (radial) modes of a two-ion crystal. (a) i. Ions are subjected to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Micromotion enhancement of radial fast gates in a RF trap with relative mode splitting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Analysis of gate solutions from Fig. 2ii. illustrating micromotion enhancement in gates with sub-trap-period duration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Infidelities of fast gates evaluated with a finite repetition rate for relative RF frequencies of Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The effect of SDK pulse area errors on the fast gate mechanism. (a) Pulse area errors lead to imperfect population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Error analysis for select gate solutions with duration of approximately one radial trapping period, i.e. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Micromotion in radio-frequency ion traps is generally considered detrimental for quantum logic gates, and is typically minimized in state-of-the-art experiments. However, as a deterministic effect, it can be incorporated into quantum control frameworks aimed at designing high-fidelity quantum logic controls. In this work, we demonstrate that micromotion can be beneficial to the design of fast gates utilizing the radial modes of a two-ion crystal, particularly in the sub-trap-period regime where high-fidelity control sequences are identified with operation times ranging from hundreds of nanoseconds to microseconds. Through analysis of select fast gate solutions, we uncover the physical origin of micromotion enhancement and further study the induced gate error under experimental noises and control imperfections. This analysis establishes the feasibility of realising high-fidelity entangling gates in hundreds of nanoseconds using the micromotion-sensitive radial modes of trapped-ion crystals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a quantum control framework that incorporates the deterministic micromotion effect in radio-frequency ion traps to design high-fidelity fast entangling gates utilizing the radial modes of a two-ion crystal. High-fidelity control sequences are identified for operation times ranging from hundreds of nanoseconds to microseconds in the sub-trap-period regime. The authors analyze the physical origin of the micromotion-induced enhancement and evaluate the resulting gate errors under experimental noises and control imperfections, thereby establishing the feasibility of realizing such gates on short timescales.

Significance. If the results hold, this work is significant for trapped-ion quantum computing because it demonstrates how a typically minimized effect can be turned into an advantage for achieving entangling gates substantially faster than the trap period. Faster gates reduce exposure to decoherence and support deeper circuits in scaled systems. The error analysis under realistic noises adds practical value, and the identification of specific sequences with physical insight strengthens the contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] §5, noise robustness analysis: While gate errors are studied for individual experimental imperfections (laser intensity fluctuations, trap-voltage noise, positioning errors), the manuscript does not quantify the fidelity when these imperfections act simultaneously at realistic laboratory amplitudes over the short gate duration. This combined robustness is load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (12)] §4.2, Eq. (12): The effective radial-mode coupling under micromotion is derived from the time-dependent Hamiltonian, but the step showing how the deterministic micromotion term produces the reported enhancement (without additional free parameters) is not fully expanded; a explicit expansion of the interaction-picture terms would confirm the origin of the benefit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: The noise amplitudes and simulation parameters used for the error plots should be stated explicitly to allow direct comparison with experimental conditions.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: Adding a brief reference to recent experimental demonstrations of radial-mode gates would better situate the novelty of the micromotion-assisted approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary and for highlighting the potential significance of our results on micromotion-enhanced fast radial gates. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §5, noise robustness analysis: While gate errors are studied for individual experimental imperfections (laser intensity fluctuations, trap-voltage noise, positioning errors), the manuscript does not quantify the fidelity when these imperfections act simultaneously at realistic laboratory amplitudes over the short gate duration. This combined robustness is load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.

    Authors: We agree that simultaneous noise sources represent an important practical consideration for the feasibility of sub-trap-period gates. In the revised manuscript we will add a combined-error analysis in §5, using Monte Carlo sampling over realistic laboratory amplitudes of laser intensity fluctuations, trap-voltage noise, and positioning errors to report the resulting fidelity distribution for the identified fast-gate solutions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4.2, Eq. (12): The effective radial-mode coupling under micromotion is derived from the time-dependent Hamiltonian, but the step showing how the deterministic micromotion term produces the reported enhancement (without additional free parameters) is not fully expanded; a explicit expansion of the interaction-picture terms would confirm the origin of the benefit.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion to make the derivation more transparent. In the revised version of §4.2 we will insert an explicit, step-by-step expansion of the interaction-picture Hamiltonian, isolating the contributions from the deterministic micromotion term and showing how they generate the effective coupling reported in Eq. (12) without additional free parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard Hamiltonians plus deterministic micromotion term

full rationale

The paper augments the usual trapped-ion Hamiltonian with a known deterministic micromotion term, then numerically identifies fast control sequences on the radial modes and analyzes their fidelity under added noise. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fit performed on the same data, a self-citation chain, or a redefinition of the target quantity. The reported gate times and fidelities are outputs of the model rather than inputs, and the noise study is performed on the forward-simulated dynamics. This is the normal, non-circular case for a quantum-control design paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard quantum-optics model of a two-ion crystal in a Paul trap that includes the known time-dependent micromotion term; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The micromotion in an RF Paul trap is a deterministic, known function of the trap parameters and can be included exactly in the time-dependent Hamiltonian.
    Invoked when the authors state that micromotion is incorporated into the quantum control framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5487 in / 1364 out tokens · 39469 ms · 2026-05-17T21:18:46.732400+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    As a result, the exact sequence of SDK timings and magnitudes that constitute a fast gate scheme must be found via numerical minimisation of Eq

    and motional restoration (∆X α = ∆Yα = 0 for each mode). As a result, the exact sequence of SDK timings and magnitudes that constitute a fast gate scheme must be found via numerical minimisation of Eq. (23). Optimisation over the unconstrained 2N-dimensional parameter space is numerically intractable, and thus constraints must be placed on the SDK sequenc...

    work page

  2. [2]

    2(a) where micromotion-enhanced fidelities are observed, and the latter case is an example of where high-fidelity solutions can be found for all micromotion amplitudes

    The former case corresponds to a region in Fig. 2(a) where micromotion-enhanced fidelities are observed, and the latter case is an example of where high-fidelity solutions can be found for all micromotion amplitudes. Fig. 4(a) shows that, for gate speeds comparable or faster than a trapping period, accessing the regime of micromotion-enhanced gate fidelit...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Physical Review Letters74, 4091 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021314 (2019), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5088164/19742554/021314\ 1\ online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5088164/19742554/021314 2019

  5. [5]

    Drmota, D

    P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, D. Main, B. C. Nichol, E. M. Ainley, D. Leichtle, A. Mantri, E. Kashefi, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 150604 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    L. J. Stephenson, D. P. Nadlinger, B. C. Nichol, S. An, P. Drmota, T. G. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, J. F. Goodwin, D. M. Lucas, and C. J. Ballance, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Drmota, D

    P. Drmota, D. Main, D. P. Nadlinger, B. C. Nichol, M. A. Weber, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 090803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    O’Reilly, G

    J. O’Reilly, G. Toh, I. Goetting, S. Saha, M. Shalaev, A. L. Carter, A. Risinger, A. Kalakuntla, T. Li, A. Verma, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 090802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    M. C. Marshall, D. A. R. Castillo, W. J. Arthur-Dworschack, A. Aeppli, K. Kim, D. Lee, W. Warfield, J. Hinrichs, N. V. Nardelli, T. M. Fortier, J. Ye, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. B. Hume, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 033201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, Nature 609, 689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    W. B. Cairncross, D. N. Gresh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, T. S. Roussy, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 153001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Carney, H

    D. Carney, H. H¨ affner, D. C. Moore, and J. M. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 061804 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Langer, R

    C. Langer, R. Ozeri, J. D. Jost, J. Chiaverini, B. DeMarco, A. Ben-Kish, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, D. B. Hume, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, T. Rosenband, T. Schaetz, P. O. Schmidt, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 060502 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    T. P. Harty, D. T. C. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, L. Guidoni, H. A. Janacek, N. M. Linke, D. N. Stacey, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 220501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Wang, C.-Y

    P. Wang, C.-Y. Luan, M. Qiao, M. Um, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Yuan, M. Gu, J. Zhang, and K. Kim, Nature Communi- cations12, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 060504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Srinivas, S

    R. Srinivas, S. C. Burd, H. M. Knaack, R. T. Sutherland, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Glancy, E. Knill, D. J. Wineland, D. Leibfried, A. C. Wilson, D. T. C. Allcock, and D. H. Slichter, Nature597, 209 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    High-fidelity and Fault-tolerant Teleportation of a Logical Qubit using Transversal Gates and Lattice Surgery on a Trapped-ion Quantum Computer,

    C. Ryan-Anderson, N. C. Brown, C. H. Baldwin, J. M. Dreiling, C. Foltz, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, N. Hewitt, C. Holliman, C. V. Horst, J. Johansen, D. Lucchetti, T. Mengle, M. Matheny, Y. Matsuoka, K. Mayer, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, J. Pino, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, J. Walker, and D. Hayes, “High-fidelity and Fault-tolerant Teleportati...

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    S. A. Moses, C. H. Baldwin, M. S. Allman, R. Ancona, L. Ascarrunz, C. Barnes, J. Bartolotta, B. Bjork, P. Blanchard, M. Bohn, J. G. Bohnet, N. C. Brown, N. Q. Burdick, W. C. Burton, S. L. Campbell, J. P. Campora, C. Carron, J. Chambers, J. W. Chan, Y. H. Chen, A. Chernoguzov, E. Chertkov, J. Colina, J. P. Curtis, R. Daniel, M. DeCross, D. Deen, C. Delaney...

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    A. D. Leu, M. F. Gely, M. A. Weber, M. C. Smith, D. P. Nadlinger, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 120601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Z. Cai, C. Y. Luan, L. Ou, H. Tu, Z. Yin, J. N. Zhang, and K. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc.82, 882 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    M. A. Weber, M. F. Gely, R. K. Hanley, T. P. Harty, A. D. Leu, C. M. L¨ oschnauer, D. P. Nadlinger, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. A110, L010601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Wright, K

    K. Wright, K. M. Beck, S. Debnath, J. M. Amini, Y. Nam, N. Grzesiak, J.-S. Chen, N. C. Pisenti, M. Chmielewski, C. Collins, K. M. Hudek, J. Mizrahi, J. D. Wong-Campos, S. Allen, J. Apisdorf, P. Solomon, M. Williams, A. M. Ducore, A. Blinov, S. M. Kreikemeier, V. Chaplin, M. Keesan, C. Monroe, and J. Kim, Nat Commun10, 5464 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Debnath, N

    S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Nature536, 63 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Figgatt, A

    C. Figgatt, A. Ostrander, N. M. Linke, K. A. Landsman, D. Zhu, D. Maslov, and C. Monroe, Nature572, 368 (2019). 19

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Hou, Y.-J

    Y.-H. Hou, Y.-J. Yi, Y.-K. Wu, Y.-Y. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y.-L. Xu, C. Zhang, Q.-X. Mei, H.-X. Yang, J.-Y. Ma, S.-A. Guo, J. Ye, B.-X. Qi, Z.-C. Zhou, P.-Y. Hou, and L.-M. Duan, Nat Commun15, 9710 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Grzesiak, R

    N. Grzesiak, R. Bl¨ umel, K. Wright, K. M. Beck, N. C. Pisenti, M. Li, V. Chaplin, J. M. Amini, S. Debnath, J.-S. Chen, and Y. Nam, Nat Commun11, 2963 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    J.-S. Chen, E. Nielsen, M. Ebert, V. Inlek, K. Wright, V. Chaplin, A. Maksymov, E. P´ aez, A. Poudel, P. Maunz, and J. Gamble, Quantum8, 1516 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Kielpinski, C

    D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Nature417, 709 (2002)

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Y. Wan, D. Kienzler, S. D. Erickson, K. H. Mayer, T. R. Tan, J. J. Wu, H. M. Vasconcelos, S. Glancy, E. Knill, D. J. Wineland, A. C. Wilson, and D. Leibfried, Science364, 875 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Kaushal, B

    V. Kaushal, B. Lekitsch, A. Stahl, J. Hilder, D. Pijn, C. Schmiegelow, A. Bermudez, M. M¨ uller, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. Poschinger, AVS Quantum Science2, 014101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. Ryan-Anderson, and B. Neyenhuis, Nature592, 209 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Mordini, A

    C. Mordini, A. Ricci Vasquez, Y. Motohashi, M. M¨ uller, M. Malinowski, C. Zhang, K. K. Mehta, D. Kienzler, and J. P. Home, Phys. Rev. X15, 011040 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Akhtar, F

    M. Akhtar, F. Bonus, F. R. Lebrun-Gallagher, N. I. Johnson, M. Siegele-Brown, S. Hong, S. J. Hile, S. A. Kulmiya, S. Weidt, and W. K. Hensinger, Nature Communications14, 531 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Paul, Rev

    W. Paul, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 531 (1990)

    work page 1990

  36. [36]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Reviews of Modern Physics75, 281 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Shen and L.-M

    C. Shen and L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. A90, 022332 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    S.-T. Wang, C. Shen, and L.-M. Duan, Sci Rep5, 8555 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Bermudez, X

    A. Bermudez, X. Xu, R. Nigmatullin, J. O’Gorman, V. Negnevitsky, P. Schindler, T. Monz, U. G. Poschinger, C. Hempel, J. Home, F. Schmidt-Kaler, M. Biercuk, R. Blatt, S. Benjamin, and M. M¨ uller, Physical Review X7, 041061 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Wu, Z.-D

    Y.-K. Wu, Z.-D. Liu, W.-D. Zhao, and L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. A103, 022419 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    A. K. Ratcliffe, L. M. Oberg, and J. J. Hope, Physical Review A101, 052332 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    M. J. Madsen, D. L. Moehring, P. Maunz, R. N. Kohn, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 040505 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    W. C. Campbell, J. Mizrahi, Q. Quraishi, C. Senko, D. Hayes, D. Hucul, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 090502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Mizrahi, C

    J. Mizrahi, C. Senko, B. Neyenhuis, K. G. Johnson, W. C. Campbell, C. W. S. Conover, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Mizrahi, B

    J. Mizrahi, B. Neyenhuis, K. G. Johnson, W. C. Campbell, C. Senko, D. Hayes, and C. Monroe, Applied Physics B114, 45 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    V. M. Sch¨ afer, C. J. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, L. J. Stephenson, T. G. Ballance, A. M. Steane, and D. M. Lucas, Nature 555, 75 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    J. D. Wong-Campos, S. A. Moses, K. G. Johnson, and C. Monroe, Physical Review Letters119, 230501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, P. Zoller, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review Letters91, 157901 (2003)

    work page 2003

  49. [49]

    J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, P. Zoller, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review A71, 062309 (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    S.-L. Zhu, C. Monroe, and L.-M. Duan, Physical Review Letters97, 050505 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Fast gates for ion traps by splitting laser pulses

    CDB. Bentley, ARR. Carvalho, D. Kielpinski, and Hope, JJ, New Journal of Physics15, 043006 (2013), arXiv:1211.7156 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    R. L. Taylor, C. D. B. Bentley, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, A. R. R. Carvalho, and J. J. Hope, Scientific Reports7, 46197 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    E. P. G. Gale, Z. Mehdi, L. M. Oberg, A. K. Ratcliffe, S. A. Haine, and J. J. Hope, Physical Review A101, 052328 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Savill-Brown, J

    I. Savill-Brown, J. J. Hope, A. K. Ratcliffe, V. D. Vaidya, H. Liu, S. A. Haine, C. R. Viteri, and Z. Mehdi, “High-speed and high-connectivity two-qubit gates in long chains of trapped ions,” (2025), arXiv:2506.11385 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Mehdi, A

    Z. Mehdi, A. K. Ratcliffe, and J. J. Hope, Physical Review Research3, 013026 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Savill-Brown, Z

    I. Savill-Brown, Z. Mehdi, A. K. Ratcliffe, V. D. Vaidya, H. Liu, S. A. Haine, C. R. Viteri, and J. J. Hope, “Error-Resilient Fast Entangling Gates for Scalable Ion-Trap Quantum Processors,” (2025), arXiv:2508.07593 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Fast mixed-species quantum logic gates for trapped-ion quantum networks,

    Z. Mehdi, V. D. Vaidya, I. Savill-Brown, P. Grosser, A. K. Ratcliffe, H. Liu, S. A. Haine, J. J. Hope, and C. R. Viteri, “Fast mixed-species quantum logic gates for trapped-ion quantum networks,” (2025), arXiv:2412.07185 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    A. K. Ratcliffe, R. L. Taylor, J. J. Hope, and A. R. R. Carvalho, Physical Review Letters120, 220501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Mehdi, AK Ratcliffe, and JJ Hope, Phys

    Z. Mehdi, AK Ratcliffe, and JJ Hope, Phys. Rev. A102, 012618 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Wu and L.-M

    Y.-K. Wu and L.-M. Duan, Chinese Phys. Lett.37, 070302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    J.-Y. Ji, J. K. Kim, and S. P. Kim, Phys. Rev. A51, 4268 (1995)

    work page 1995

  62. [62]

    This definition of the secular frequency is subtly different from the definition in terms of the Wronskian identityu∗ α(t) ˙uα(t)− uα(t) ˙u∗ α(t) = 2iωα [34]

    work page

  63. [63]

    Putnam, A

    R. Putnam, A. D. West, W. C. Campbell, and P. Hamilton, Phys. Rev. A109, 032614 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    C. D. B. Bentley, A. R. R. Carvalho, and J. J. Hope, New Journal of Physics17, 103025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    D. J. Berkeland, J. D. Miller, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Journal of Applied Physics83, 5025 (1998), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/83/10/5025/18699946/5025\ 1\ online.pdf

    work page 1998

  66. [66]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Physical Review A62(2000), 10.1103/physreva.62.022311

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.62.022311 2000

  67. [67]

    Duan, Phys

    L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 100502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  68. [68]

    C. D. B. Bentley, R. L. Taylor, A. R. R. Carvalho, and J. J. Hope, Physical Review A93, 042342 (2016). 20

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    M. I. Hussain, M. J. Petrasiunas, C. D. B. Bentley, R. L. Taylor, A. R. R. Carvalho, J. J. Hope, E. W. Streed, M. Lobino, and D. Kielpinski, Opt. Express24, 16638 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Heinrich, M

    D. Heinrich, M. Guggemos, M. Guevara-Bertsch, M. I. Hussain, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt, New Journal of Physics21, 073017 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Shimizu, J

    K. Shimizu, J. Scarabel, E. Bridge, S. Connell, M. Ghadimi, B. Haylock, M. I. Hussain, E. Streed, and M. Lobino, Applied Physics Letters119, 214003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    M. I. Hussain, M. Guevara-Bertsch, E. Torrontegui, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, arXiv [quant-ph] (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    K. G. Johnson, J. D. Wong-Campos, B. Neyenhuis, J. Mizrahi, and C. Monroe, Nature Communications8(2017), 10.1038/s41467-017-00682-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00682-6 2017

  74. [74]

    K. G. Johnson, B. Neyenhuis, J. Mizrahi, J. D. Wong-Campos, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 213001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    Guo, Y.-K

    W.-X. Guo, Y.-K. Wu, Y.-Y. Huang, L. Feng, C.-X. Huang, H.-X. Yang, J.-Y. Ma, L. Yao, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Physical Review A106(2022), 10.1103/physreva.106.022608

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.022608 2022

  76. [76]

    H.-N. Wu, C. Zhang, J. Song, Y. Xia, and Z.-C. Shi, Phys. Rev. A107, 023103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    N. V. Vitanov, A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  78. [78]

    M. R. Dietrich, A. Avril, R. Bowler, N. Kurz, J. S. Salacka, G. Shu, B. B. Blinov, J. R. Danielson, and T. S. Pedersen, inAIP Conference Proceedings(AIP, New York (New York), 2009) pp. 25–30

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    I. D. Moore, W. C. Campbell, E. R. Hudson, M. J. Boguslawski, D. J. Wineland, and D. T. C. Allcock, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032413 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement,

    A. S. Sotirova, J. D. Leppard, A. Vazquez-Brennan, S. M. Decoppet, F. Pokorny, M. Malinowski, and C. J. Ballance, “High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement,” (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.