On the optimal local well-posedness of the wave kinetic equation in $L^r$

Ioakeim Ampatzoglou; Tristan L\'eger

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The three-dimensional wave kinetic equation is locally well-posed in every almost critical weighted L^r space for 2≤r≤∞: unique strong solutions exist for small times, depend continuously on the data, and preserve positivity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 21:22 UTC pith:J4MAVDKV

load-bearing objection Extends the local well-posedness result for the 3D wave kinetic equation to all r≥2 with a unified kinetic proof; the estimates look right, but the proof leans on two load-bearing change-of-variables lemmas imported without proof from the authors' own preprints. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.15587 v2 pith:J4MAVDKV submitted 2025-11-19 math.AP math-phmath.MP

On the optimal local well-posedness of the wave kinetic equation in L^r

Ioakeim Ampatzoglou , Tristan L\'eger This is my paper

classification math.AP math-phmath.MP MSC 35Q2035Q5582C40

keywords wave kinetic equationlocal well-posednessweighted L^r spacescollisional averaging estimatesresonant manifoldgain and loss operatorspositivity preservationkinetic theory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes local well-posedness for the three-dimensional wave kinetic equation — the canonical statistical model of weak wave turbulence — in almost critical weighted L^r spaces for every 2≤r≤∞. For any initial datum in ⟨k⟩^{-l}L^r with l=2−3/r+δ and δ>0 small (δ<1/r for finite r), there is a unique strong solution on a short time interval; the solution depends continuously on the data, and non-negative data remain non-negative. This completes the scale of weighted L^r well-posedness, extending the earlier L^2 and L^∞ results to the whole range of exponents. The proof is purely kinetic: it does not use Fourier analysis, relying instead on a hard-sphere parametrization of the resonant manifold and on angular averaging estimates that compensate the linear growth of the collision cross-section.

Core claim

The central claim is a set of four trilinear estimates (Propositions 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2): each of the four components of the collision operator — the two gain terms G0, G1 and the two loss terms L0, L1 — maps ⟨k⟩^l L^r × ⟨k⟩^l L^r × ⟨k⟩^l L^r boundedly into ⟨k⟩^l L^r, with no loss of the polynomial weight, provided l=2−3/r+δ. The genuine gain term G1 requires δ<1/r, while the other three operators only need δ<1. Because these bounds are weight-preserving, the initial value problem becomes a contraction mapping, giving existence, uniqueness, continuous dependence and, via a monotone iteration, positivity. The proof replaces Fourier methods with a geometric picture: the resonant manifold is pa

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the collision geometry. On the resonant manifold — the set of wavevectors obeying conservation of momentum and energy — the two outgoing wavevectors are written as K ± (|w|/2)σ, where K is the midpoint of the incoming wavevectors and σ runs over the unit sphere; this parametrization carries a cross-section |w|. Three tools work together: (i) a change of variables that makes the two 'pre-collisional' directions orthogonal, with an explicit inverse and Jacobian of size 4/(ν̂·σ)²; (ii) collisional averaging estimates controlling integrals of ⟨k*⟩^{-l} over σ, valid for singularities with α<1 or α>1/2; and (iii) a self-inverse change of variables (an involution) that s

Load-bearing premise

The entire proof rests on two geometric change-of-variables facts whose proofs are deferred to previous papers by the same authors — the explicit inverse and Jacobian for the sphere-parametrized map, and the involutive pre-post collisional change of variables; if either the Jacobian formula or the involution identity were wrong, the averaging estimates and hence the well-posedness theorem would collapse.

What would settle it

Directly compute the Jacobian of the inverse of y↦y/2+(|y|/2)σ on the half-space {ν: ν·σ>0} and compare to 4/(ν̂·σ)²; or numerically evaluate the angular integral of Lemma 2.4 with h a Gaussian and k=0 at the endpoint values α=1/2 and α=1. A contradiction in either check — a Jacobian that differs from the stated formula, or convergence outside the claimed ranges — would invalidate the chain of trilinear estimates and therefore Theorem 1.1.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

The local well-posedness theory for the wave kinetic equation now covers the full scale of almost critical weighted L^r spaces, 2≤r≤∞, with the previously known L^2 and L^∞ results as endpoint cases.
The time of existence depends only on the weighted L^r norm of the initial data, and the estimate (1.2) gives uniform Lipschitz continuous dependence on the data in the same space.
Non-negative initial data produce non-negative solutions over the interval of existence, so the theory applies to physically meaningful distributions.
A single set of collisional averaging estimates drives all cases 2≤r≤∞; no Fourier analysis is needed for any exponent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step is the critical case δ=0: the averaging estimates have borderline integrability at exactly the values that would be required, so the almost-critical restriction is likely a genuine threshold rather than an artifact of the technique.
The moment gain in the loss operators makes the collision term a subcritical perturbation, suggesting that global existence or scattering in these weighted spaces could be within reach.
Because the estimates are written entirely in physical space, the same machinery may adapt to other dispersion relations or to higher-order wave kinetic models whenever the resonant manifold admits a hard-sphere-type parametrization; a useful test would be a four-wave or anisotropic analogue.
One could test the sharpness of the δ conditions by feeding simple analytic functions (Gaussians or power laws) into the averaging estimates and looking for divergence exactly at the predicted thresholds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

Extends the local well-posedness result for the 3D wave kinetic equation to all r≥2 with a unified kinetic proof; the estimates look right, but the proof leans on two load-bearing change-of-variables lemmas imported without proof from the authors' own preprints.

read the letter

Here's the take: this is a genuine extension of the known L^2/L^∞ theory for the 3D wave kinetic equation to all r≥2, and the proof is methodologically distinct, using Bobylev variables and angular averaging instead of Radon/Fourier transforms. The four trilinear estimates in Sections 3–4 are the core and they look sound. The fixed-point argument and the positivity section are standard. The paper is clearly written and the estimates are detailed.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flagged: the proof leans on Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 2.5, which give the Bobylev change of variables and an involutionary identity. Both are stated without proof, deferred to the authors' preprints. They are used everywhere, so the manuscript is not self-contained at a load-bearing point. I don't think this is a fatal flaw — the lemmas are standard in the authors' earlier work and a spot-check suggests they are correct — but a referee should verify them before accepting, and the authors would do well to include the proofs or at least a detailed appendix. There are also a few typos and repeated phrases, but nothing that affects the math.

One more thing: the title says 'optimal', but the paper does not prove ill-posedness for the critical exponent δ=0 or below r=2. It recovers and improves [21], but 'optimal' is not justified by the results here. That's a minor presentational issue.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. If the imported lemmas check out, it's a publishable contribution to the local well-posedness theory of WKE. I would cite it and would put it on the reading group.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified local well-posedness theory for the 3D wave kinetic equation in almost critical weighted L^r spaces for 2 ≤ r ≤ ∞. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that for l = 2 − 3/r + δ (δ > 0, with δ < 1/r when r < ∞), every f0 ∈ ⟨k⟩^{-l}L^r admits a unique strong solution f ∈ C([0,T]; ⟨k⟩^{-l}L^r), with continuous dependence on the initial datum and with positivity preservation. The proof decomposes the collision operator into gain and loss trilinear operators G0, G1, L0, L1, proves explicit moment-preserving L^r estimates for each using Bobylev variables and angular averaging lemmas, and then applies a contraction-mapping argument. Positivity is treated by a Kaniel–Shinbrot iteration.

Significance. If fully correct, this is a substantial contribution: it extends the known almost-critical local well-posedness results in L^2 and L^∞ by Germain–Ionescu–Tran to the full range 2 ≤ r ≤ ∞, and it does so with a unified, purely kinetic proof that avoids Fourier methods. The multilinear estimates are explicit and parameter-free, and the contraction argument is standard and easy to verify. At the same time, the central well-posedness proof depends on two geometric change-of-variables results whose proofs are not included in the manuscript, and the positivity proof contains an algebraic sign error. The significance is therefore conditional until those points are resolved.

major comments (2)

[§2.1, Proposition 2.1 and §2.4, Lemma 2.5] Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 2.5 are load-bearing for the entire paper. Proposition 2.1 supplies the inverse map and Jacobian of the Bobylev variables and is used in every estimate of Lemma 2.4 (Eqs. (2.20)–(2.22)), hence throughout Sections 3–4. Lemma 2.5 supplies the involution identity (2.25) used in the proof of Proposition 3.2. The manuscript does not prove either result, instead referring to the authors' preprints [4,6] and to Lemma 2.6 of [6]. Since the L^r estimates and therefore Theorem 1.1 would collapse if the stated domains, inverse formula, or Jacobian were incorrect, the central claim is currently conditional on external material not verified in this paper. Please include complete proofs, or at least precisely stated and fully proved versions, in an appendix.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.15)] The positivity proof contains an algebraic sign error. With w = u − l, the paper claims uR[l] − lR[u] = wR[l] + l(R[u] − R[l]) ≥ 0. The correct identity is uR[l] − lR[u] = (l+w)R[l] − lR[u] = wR[l] + l(R[l] − R[u]) = wR[l] − l(R[u] − R[l]). Since R is monotone increasing for nonnegative functions considered here, R[u] ≥ R[l], so the second term is nonpositive, not nonnegative. Consequently the inequality w(t) ≤ ∫_0^t (Q+[u] − Q+[l]) ds does not follow, and the convergence argument for the Kaniel–Shinbrot iteration is invalid as written. This affects the positivity assertion of Theorem 1.1 and needs to be repaired or the claim removed.

minor comments (4)

[§2.3, proof of Lemma 2.3] In the spherical-coordinate integrations after Eq. (2.18), the measure is written as dσ where a one-dimensional dx is intended. This is a typo, but it makes the computation of the angular integral unclear.
[§3.1, Eq. (3.4)] The definitions l0 = (1−δ)/2 and l1 = (1+δ)/2 are typeset in a way that can be misread as l0 = 1 − δ/2. Please display the fractions unambiguously, since the property l0 + l1 = 1 is used repeatedly.
[§2.4, Lemma 2.5] The map T is not defined when w = 0 because η = −ŵ is undefined. Since this is a null set, the statement is harmless, but it should be stated explicitly.
[§4.1, §4.2] Minor typographical issues: 'r <∞=' appears in the opening of the case splits in Propositions 4.1 and 4.2, and there are several missing parentheses in displayed formulas, e.g. '(1− |“K·σ) 1/2' in the proof of Proposition 4.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from explicit trilinear estimates; the self-cited Bobylev and involutive change-of-variable lemmas are parameter-free identities, not fitted inputs or restatements of the target result.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is proved in Section 5 by a contraction-mapping argument using the explicit trilinear bounds of Propositions 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, and 4.2. These propositions are proved in the paper from the averaging estimates in Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4 and the change-of-variables formula (2.25); there are no fitted parameters, no data-dependent constants, and no prediction that is statistically forced by an input. The only self-citations are to the authors' earlier preprints for Proposition 2.1 ('The proof of this result is contained in our previous papers [4, 6]') and for Lemma 2.5 ('For a proof of this classical result, see e.g. Lemma 2.6 in [6]'). These are load-bearing in the sense that Lemma 2.4 and several estimates invoke Proposition 2.1, and Proposition 3.2 uses (2.25). However, they are parameter-free coordinate identities with stated hypotheses that do not include the target L^r estimates or Theorem 1.1; they are not equivalent to the conclusion, nor do they rename the conclusion in new coordinates. Deferring proofs to preprints is a completeness or verification concern, not circularity. The main derivation is self-contained conditional on those elementary lemmas, and no step reduces a purported prediction to its own definition or to a fitted assumption.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof is almost self-contained at the level of operator estimates, but two technical lemmas are imported from the authors' own preprints, and the co-area representation is used as a black box. There are no fitted constants in the sense of empirical science; the only adjustable number is the regularity parameter δ. The ledger is otherwise clean.

free parameters (1)

δ (almost-critical slack) = 0<δ<1/r for r<∞; δ>0 for r=∞
Controls how far the weight l=2−3/r+δ sits above the scaling-critical exponent. It is chosen by hand to make angular averages integrable and is not fitted to data.

axioms (4)

standard math Co-area/Fubini parametrization of the resonant manifold, yielding the hard-sphere-type representation (1.3) with cross-section |w|.
Used throughout to replace the delta-function collision integral by an integral over R^3×S^2; assumed without proof.
standard math Proposition 2.1: Bobylev maps R^ε_σ are diffeomorphisms with the stated inverse and Jacobian 4/(ν̂·σ)^2.
Proof deferred to the authors' preprints [4,6]. All averaging estimates in Lemma 2.4 and all operator bounds in Sections 3–4 rely on this change of variables.
standard math Lemma 2.5: the map (k,k1,σ) ↦ (k*,k*1,η) is an involution and satisfies the change-of-variables formula (2.25).
Proof deferred to Lemma 2.6 of [6]. Used for the L^r bound on G1 and in the positivity/convergence argument.
standard math Weighted interpolation estimate (3.4): weighted L^2 norms are controlled by weighted L^r norms when δ>0.
Used to close the G0 and L0 estimates; a standard Hölder/weighted embedding fact.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22157 in / 23220 out tokens · 228603 ms · 2026-08-03T21:22:04.575999+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

In this paper, we give a unified treatment of the local well-posedness for the wave kinetic equation in almost critical weighted $L^r$ spaces with $2 \leq r \leq \infty.$ The proof builds on ideas from our earlier works \cite{AmLe24, AmLemain25}. Our approach is based solely on kinetic tools, with no appeal to Fourier theory.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Entropy Structures and Long-Time Relaxation for 3-Wave Kinetic Equations
math.AP 2026-05 conditional novelty 8.0

For a broad class of 3-wave kinetic equations, a new one-sided entropy mechanism yields global L^1_loc weak solutions and forces local relaxation to zero as t tends to infinity.
Entropy Structures and Long-Time Relaxation for 3-Wave Kinetic Equations
math.AP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

New entropy structures from one-sided balance conditions on interaction weights yield global weak L1_loc solutions to 3-wave kinetic equations and prove their local relaxation to zero equilibrium.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. Carneiro,Estimates for the Boltzmann collision operator via radial symmetry and Fourier transform, Adv. Math. 223 (2010) 511–528

2010
[2]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. Carneiro, I.M. Gamba,Convolution Inequalities for the Boltzmann Collision Operator, Comm. Math. Phys. 298, 293–322 (2010)

2010
[3]

Ampatzoglou,Global well-posedness of the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation near vacuum, Kinet

I. Ampatzoglou,Global well-posedness of the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation near vacuum, Kinet. Relat. Models17(2024), no. 6, 838-854

2024
[4]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,Scattering theory for the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation, arXiv:2408.05818 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[5]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,On the ill-posedness of wave kinetic equations, Nonlinearity 38 115004 (2025)

2025
[6]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,Convolution estimates for the Boltzmann gain operator with hard spheres, arXiv:2505.09554 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[7]

Ampatzoglou, J.K

I. Ampatzoglou, J.K. Miller, N. Pavlovi´ c, M. Taskovi´ c,Inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation and its hierarchy in polynomially weightedL ∞ spaces, Comm. Partial Differential Equations50(2025), no. 6, 723-765

2025
[8]

Arsenio,On the global existence of mild solutions to the Boltzmann equation for small data inL D, Comm

D. Arsenio,On the global existence of mild solutions to the Boltzmann equation for small data inL D, Comm. Math. Phys.302(2011), 453-476

2011
[9]

Bobylev,Fourier transform method in the theory of the Boltzmann equation for Maxwellian molecules, Dokl

A.V. Bobylev,Fourier transform method in the theory of the Boltzmann equation for Maxwellian molecules, Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR225(1975), 1041– 1044

1975
[10]

Bobylev,The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules, Sov

A.V. Bobylev,The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules, Sov. Sci. Rev. C. Math. Phys.7(1988), 111–233

1988
[11]

Buckmaster, P

T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, J. Shatah,Onset of the wave turbulence description of the longtime behavior of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Invent. Math.225(2021), no. 3, 787–855

2021
[12]

Collot, P

C. Collot, P. Germain,On the derivation of the homogeneous wave kinetic equation, to appear in Comm. Pure Appl. Math., arXiv:1912.10368

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912
[13]

Collot, P

C. Collot, P. Germain,Derivation of the homogeneous wave kinetic equation: longer time scales, arXiv:2007.03508

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[14]

Collot, H

C. Collot, H. Dietert, P. Germain,Stability and cascades for the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum of wave turbulence, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024),no. 1, no. 7, 31 pp

2024
[15]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,On the derivation of the wave kinetic equation for NLS, Forum Math. Pi9(2021), Paper No. e6, 37 pp

2021
[16]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation, Invent. Math.233(2023), no. 2, 543–724

2023
[17]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,Long time justification of wave turbulence theory, preprint arXiv:2311.10082

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani, X. MaLong time derivation of Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics, Preprint arXiv:2408.07818 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[19]

Escobedo, A

M. Escobedo, A. Menegaki,Instability of singular equilibria of a wave kinetic equation, arXiv:2406.05280 ON THE OPTIMAL LOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS OF THE WKE INL r 27

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[20]

Escobedo, J.J.L

M. Escobedo, J.J.L. Vel´ azquez,On the theory of weak turbulence for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.238(2015), no. 1124, v+107 pp

2015
[21]

Germain, A

P. Germain, A. D. Ionescu, M.-B. Tran,Optimal local well-posedness theory for the wave kinetic equation, J. Funct. Anal.279(2020), no.4, 108570, 28 pp

2020
[22]

Gustafsson,L p-estimates for the nonlinear spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch

T. Gustafsson,L p-estimates for the nonlinear spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch. Ratio- nal Mech. Anal. 92, 1 (1986), 23–57

1986
[23]

Gustafsson,GlobalL p-properties for the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch

T. Gustafsson,GlobalL p-properties for the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 103 (1988), 1–38

1988
[24]

Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. I. General theory, J. Fluid Mech.12(1962), 481–500

1962
[25]

Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. II. Conservation theorems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility, J. Fluid Mech.15(1963), 273–281

1963
[26]

Illner, M

R. Illner, M. Shinbrot,The Boltzmann Equation: Global Existence for a Rare Gas in an Infinite Vacuum, Commun. Math. Phys.95, 217-226 (1984)

1984
[27]

Kaniel, M

S. Kaniel, M. Shinbrot,The Boltzmann Equation: Uniqueness and Local Existence, Comm. Math. Phys. 58, 65-84 (1978)

1978
[28]

Lanford,Time evolution of large classical systems, Lect

O.E. Lanford,Time evolution of large classical systems, Lect. Notes in Physics 38, J. Moser ed. (1975), 1–111, Springer Verlag

1975
[29]

Nazarenko,Wave turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics,825

S. Nazarenko,Wave turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics,825. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

2011
[30]

Pavlovi´ c, M

N. Pavlovi´ c, M. Taskovi´ c, L. Velasco,Inhomogeneous six-wave kinetic equation in exponentially weighted L∞ spaces, arXiv:2501.10565 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[31]

R. Peierls,Zur kinetischen theorie der W¨ armeleitung in kristallen, Annalen der Physik395(1929) 1055-1101 Baruch College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, Newman Vertical Campus, 55 Lexington A ve, New York, NY, 10010, USA Email address:ioakeim.ampatzoglou@baruch.cuny.edu ; iampatzoglou@gc.cuny.edu Yale University, Mathematics Departmen...

1929

[1] [1]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. Carneiro,Estimates for the Boltzmann collision operator via radial symmetry and Fourier transform, Adv. Math. 223 (2010) 511–528

2010

[2] [2]

Alonso, E

R. Alonso, E. Carneiro, I.M. Gamba,Convolution Inequalities for the Boltzmann Collision Operator, Comm. Math. Phys. 298, 293–322 (2010)

2010

[3] [3]

Ampatzoglou,Global well-posedness of the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation near vacuum, Kinet

I. Ampatzoglou,Global well-posedness of the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation near vacuum, Kinet. Relat. Models17(2024), no. 6, 838-854

2024

[4] [4]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,Scattering theory for the inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation, arXiv:2408.05818 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[5] [5]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,On the ill-posedness of wave kinetic equations, Nonlinearity 38 115004 (2025)

2025

[6] [6]

Ampatzoglou, T

I. Ampatzoglou, T. L´ eger,Convolution estimates for the Boltzmann gain operator with hard spheres, arXiv:2505.09554 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[7] [7]

Ampatzoglou, J.K

I. Ampatzoglou, J.K. Miller, N. Pavlovi´ c, M. Taskovi´ c,Inhomogeneous wave kinetic equation and its hierarchy in polynomially weightedL ∞ spaces, Comm. Partial Differential Equations50(2025), no. 6, 723-765

2025

[8] [8]

Arsenio,On the global existence of mild solutions to the Boltzmann equation for small data inL D, Comm

D. Arsenio,On the global existence of mild solutions to the Boltzmann equation for small data inL D, Comm. Math. Phys.302(2011), 453-476

2011

[9] [9]

Bobylev,Fourier transform method in the theory of the Boltzmann equation for Maxwellian molecules, Dokl

A.V. Bobylev,Fourier transform method in the theory of the Boltzmann equation for Maxwellian molecules, Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR225(1975), 1041– 1044

1975

[10] [10]

Bobylev,The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules, Sov

A.V. Bobylev,The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules, Sov. Sci. Rev. C. Math. Phys.7(1988), 111–233

1988

[11] [11]

Buckmaster, P

T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, J. Shatah,Onset of the wave turbulence description of the longtime behavior of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Invent. Math.225(2021), no. 3, 787–855

2021

[12] [12]

Collot, P

C. Collot, P. Germain,On the derivation of the homogeneous wave kinetic equation, to appear in Comm. Pure Appl. Math., arXiv:1912.10368

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

[13] [13]

Collot, P

C. Collot, P. Germain,Derivation of the homogeneous wave kinetic equation: longer time scales, arXiv:2007.03508

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[14] [14]

Collot, H

C. Collot, H. Dietert, P. Germain,Stability and cascades for the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum of wave turbulence, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024),no. 1, no. 7, 31 pp

2024

[15] [15]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,On the derivation of the wave kinetic equation for NLS, Forum Math. Pi9(2021), Paper No. e6, 37 pp

2021

[16] [16]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation, Invent. Math.233(2023), no. 2, 543–724

2023

[17] [17]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani,Long time justification of wave turbulence theory, preprint arXiv:2311.10082

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[18] [18]

Y. Deng, Z. Hani, X. MaLong time derivation of Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics, Preprint arXiv:2408.07818 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[19] [19]

Escobedo, A

M. Escobedo, A. Menegaki,Instability of singular equilibria of a wave kinetic equation, arXiv:2406.05280 ON THE OPTIMAL LOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS OF THE WKE INL r 27

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[20] [20]

Escobedo, J.J.L

M. Escobedo, J.J.L. Vel´ azquez,On the theory of weak turbulence for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.238(2015), no. 1124, v+107 pp

2015

[21] [21]

Germain, A

P. Germain, A. D. Ionescu, M.-B. Tran,Optimal local well-posedness theory for the wave kinetic equation, J. Funct. Anal.279(2020), no.4, 108570, 28 pp

2020

[22] [22]

Gustafsson,L p-estimates for the nonlinear spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch

T. Gustafsson,L p-estimates for the nonlinear spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch. Ratio- nal Mech. Anal. 92, 1 (1986), 23–57

1986

[23] [23]

Gustafsson,GlobalL p-properties for the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch

T. Gustafsson,GlobalL p-properties for the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation,Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 103 (1988), 1–38

1988

[24] [24]

Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. I. General theory, J. Fluid Mech.12(1962), 481–500

1962

[25] [25]

Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum

K. Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. II. Conservation theorems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility, J. Fluid Mech.15(1963), 273–281

1963

[26] [26]

Illner, M

R. Illner, M. Shinbrot,The Boltzmann Equation: Global Existence for a Rare Gas in an Infinite Vacuum, Commun. Math. Phys.95, 217-226 (1984)

1984

[27] [27]

Kaniel, M

S. Kaniel, M. Shinbrot,The Boltzmann Equation: Uniqueness and Local Existence, Comm. Math. Phys. 58, 65-84 (1978)

1978

[28] [28]

Lanford,Time evolution of large classical systems, Lect

O.E. Lanford,Time evolution of large classical systems, Lect. Notes in Physics 38, J. Moser ed. (1975), 1–111, Springer Verlag

1975

[29] [29]

Nazarenko,Wave turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics,825

S. Nazarenko,Wave turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics,825. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

2011

[30] [30]

Pavlovi´ c, M

N. Pavlovi´ c, M. Taskovi´ c, L. Velasco,Inhomogeneous six-wave kinetic equation in exponentially weighted L∞ spaces, arXiv:2501.10565 (2024)

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[31] [31]

R. Peierls,Zur kinetischen theorie der W¨ armeleitung in kristallen, Annalen der Physik395(1929) 1055-1101 Baruch College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, Newman Vertical Campus, 55 Lexington A ve, New York, NY, 10010, USA Email address:ioakeim.ampatzoglou@baruch.cuny.edu ; iampatzoglou@gc.cuny.edu Yale University, Mathematics Departmen...

1929