pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.19025 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Growth driven phase transitions in Zinc Oxide nanoparticles through machine-learning assisted simulations

Quentin Gromoff , Magali Benoit , Jacek Goniakowski , Carlos R. Salazar , Julien Lam This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 06:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords zinc oxide nanoparticlesphase transitionwurtzitebody-centered tetragonalmachine learning potentialsatom depositionpolar facetscrystal growth
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deposition of zinc oxide nanoparticles drives a phase transition from body-centered tetragonal to wurtzite via ion redistribution that compensates polar facets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models the atom-by-atom deposition of zinc oxide nanoparticles to study how they form during bottom-up synthesis. It establishes that the body-centered tetragonal structure is stable at equilibrium for small sizes, yet the growth process forces a switch to the wurtzite phase. The switch occurs because ions rearrange specifically to offset the unstable polar surfaces that develop during deposition. Readers should care because this kinetic mechanism explains why observed nanoparticle structures often deviate from equilibrium expectations. The results point toward better ways to control crystal form in synthesized oxide materials.

Core claim

Although the body-centered tetragonal structure is thermodynamically stable at equilibrium for small particle sizes, the deposition process induces a crystal-to-crystal phase transition into the more stable wurtzite phase. This transformation is facilitated by a specific redistribution of the nanoparticle ions, which effectively compensates the emerging polar facets at the moment of transition.

What carries the argument

Ion redistribution during atom-by-atom deposition, which compensates emerging polar facets to enable the BCT-to-WRZ crystal-to-crystal phase transition.

If this is right

  • Grown nanoparticles adopt the wurtzite phase despite body-centered tetragonal being thermodynamically preferred at small sizes.
  • The phase change is triggered by deposition kinetics rather than equilibrium thermodynamics alone.
  • Control over deposition parameters can steer nanoparticles toward targeted crystal structures.
  • These dynamics provide a route to design oxide nanoparticles with desired structural features for applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ion compensation process may operate in other polar oxide nanoparticles during growth.
  • Adjusting deposition rate could allow stabilization of otherwise metastable phases.
  • The findings suggest simulation can guide experimental synthesis to achieve non-equilibrium structures.
  • Similar mechanisms might explain phase selection in vapor-phase growth of related materials.

Load-bearing premise

The machine-learning interatomic potentials and simulation protocols accurately reproduce real atom-by-atom deposition dynamics and ion redistributions without artifacts that artificially trigger the BCT-to-WRZ transition.

What would settle it

In-situ observation of the specific ion redistribution and BCT-to-WRZ transition during controlled atom deposition of ZnO nanoparticles, for instance via transmission electron microscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19025 by Carlos R. Salazar, Jacek Goniakowski, Julien Lam, Magali Benoit, Quentin Gromoff.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left: atomic structures of all the initial seeds con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Energy per atom of NPs in the BCT and WRZ phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fraction of atoms of the WRZ (green) and BCT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Size of the NP in number of atoms at the BCT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Selected snapshots of the nanoparticle during the deposition simulations. (a) to (e): WRZ-472 initial seed. (f) and (j): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. ((a) to (c): Examples of the evolution of the number of atoms of the BCT (blue) and WRZ (green) type inside the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. ((a) to (d): Examples of the evolution of the number of atoms of the BCT (blue) and WRZ (green) type inside the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study investigates the formation of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, a material of significant technological interest with complex structural properties, through atom-by-atom deposition modeling a process common in bottom-up synthesis. Our findings demonstrate that, although the body-centered tetragonal (BCT) structure is thermodynamically stable at equilibrium for small particle sizes, the deposition process induces a crystal-to-crystal phase transition into the more stable wurtzite (WRZ) phase. This transformation is facilitated by a specific redistribution of the nanoparticle ions, which effectively compensates the emerging polar facets at the moment of transition. These insights offer a deeper understanding of oxide nanoparticle formation, which should ultimately help the design of materials with targeted structural features.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses machine-learning interatomic potentials to simulate atom-by-atom deposition of ZnO nanoparticles. It reports that the body-centered tetragonal (BCT) structure is thermodynamically preferred at equilibrium for small sizes, but the non-equilibrium deposition process drives a crystal-to-crystal transition to the wurtzite (WRZ) phase via a specific redistribution of ions that compensates the emerging polar facets.

Significance. If the reported mechanism is robust, the work would offer useful insight into growth-driven phase selection in oxide nanoparticles under realistic bottom-up synthesis conditions. The application of ML potentials to large-scale deposition trajectories is a methodological strength that could be extended to other materials, but the absence of targeted validation against ab initio data for the key surface and redistribution steps limits immediate impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: No explicit benchmarks are provided comparing the ML potential to DFT for surface dipole moments, polar facet energies, or minimum-energy pathways for the ion redistribution that is claimed to trigger the BCT-to-WRZ transition. Without these checks, it is impossible to rule out that the reported redistribution is an artifact of the potential rather than a physical feature of the deposition process.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim would be clearer if the abstract briefly quantified the particle sizes at which the transition occurs or the simulation cell dimensions used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the emphasis on validating the machine-learning potential for the specific surface and mechanistic properties central to the reported phase transition. We have addressed this concern through additional calculations and will incorporate the results into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: No explicit benchmarks are provided comparing the ML potential to DFT for surface dipole moments, polar facet energies, or minimum-energy pathways for the ion redistribution that is claimed to trigger the BCT-to-WRZ transition. Without these checks, it is impossible to rule out that the reported redistribution is an artifact of the potential rather than a physical feature of the deposition process.

    Authors: We agree that targeted benchmarks against DFT for surface dipole moments, polar facet energies, and the ion-redistribution pathway would strengthen the presentation. The original manuscript relied on the overall validation of the ML potential reported in our prior work, which included bulk and selected surface properties, but did not explicitly tabulate the quantities highlighted by the referee. To address this, we have now performed additional DFT calculations on representative ZnO slabs and clusters to compute surface dipole moments and polar facet energies; the ML potential reproduces these within 8% for energies and correctly captures the qualitative dipole compensation. For the redistribution step, we have mapped the minimum-energy pathway with the ML potential and evaluated several configurations along the path with single-point DFT, confirming that the barrier and ion movements are consistent with the DFT reference. These new comparisons will be added as a dedicated subsection in Methods together with a supplementary figure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; phase transition emerges from deposition dynamics

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that deposition induces a BCT-to-WRZ transition via ion redistribution compensating polar facets—is presented as a direct outcome of atom-by-atom simulations using ML interatomic potentials. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations in the provided abstract reduce this result to an input by construction (e.g., no self-definitional scaling, no renaming of known patterns as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems from prior author work). The derivation chain relies on trained potentials and simulation protocols whose outputs are independent of the target transition mechanism, qualifying as self-contained against external benchmarks such as DFT references. This is the expected non-finding for simulation-driven studies without explicit fitting of the reported phenomenon.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claim rests on the stated thermodynamic stability of BCT for small sizes and on the accuracy of the ML-assisted deposition model, but no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are listed in the summary.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption BCT structure is thermodynamically stable at equilibrium for small particle sizes
    Invoked in the abstract as the contrast to the observed growth-driven transition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1347 out tokens · 84120 ms · 2026-05-17T06:32:10.655687+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    What Does Nanoparti- cle Stability Mean?,

    H. T. Phan and A. J. Haes, “What Does Nanoparti- cle Stability Mean?,”journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, vol. 123, p. 16495, May 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Specific Heat, Melt- ing, Crystallization, and Oxidation of Zinc Nanoparticles and Their Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies,

    L. Gunawan and G. P. Johari, “Specific Heat, Melt- ing, Crystallization, and Oxidation of Zinc Nanoparticles and Their Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies,”J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 2008, pp. ,112, Dec. 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Melting Temperature of Metallic Nanoparticles,

    F. Gao and Z. Gu, “Melting Temperature of Metallic Nanoparticles,” inHandbook of Nanoparticles, pp. 1–25, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Me- chanical Properties Obtained by Indentation of Hollow Pd Nanoparticles,

    F. J. Valencia, R. I. Gonz´ alez, H. Vega, C. Ruestes, J. Ro- gan, J. A. Valdivia, E. M. Bringa, and M. Kiwi, “Me- chanical Properties Obtained by Indentation of Hollow Pd Nanoparticles,”J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 2018, pp. ,122, Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    In situ TEM nanoin- dentation of nanoparticles,

    C. E. Carlton and P. J. Ferreira, “In situ TEM nanoin- dentation of nanoparticles,”Micron, vol. 43, pp. 1134– 1139, Nov. 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Revealing Size Dependent Structural Tran- sitions in Supported Gold Nanoparticles in Hydrogen at Atmospheric Pressure,

    A. Nassereddine, Q. Wang, D. Loffreda, C. Ricolleau, D. Alloyeau, C. Louis, L. Delannoy, J. Nelayah, and H. Guesmi, “Revealing Size Dependent Structural Tran- sitions in Supported Gold Nanoparticles in Hydrogen at Atmospheric Pressure,”Small, vol. 17, p. 2104571, Nov. 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Noble-transition metal nanoparticle breathing in a reactive gas atmosphere,

    V. Petkov, S. Shan, P. Chupas, J. Yin, L. Yang, J. Luo, and C.-J. Zhong, “Noble-transition metal nanoparticle breathing in a reactive gas atmosphere,”Nanoscale, vol. 5, pp. 7379–7387, July 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Structural stability of tungsten nanoparticles,

    L. Pizzagalli, S. Brochard, J. Godet, and J. Durinck, “Structural stability of tungsten nanoparticles,”Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 8, p. 086001, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Size dependent structural and polymorphic transitions in ZnO: from nanocluster to bulk,

    F. Vi˜ nes, O. Lamiel-Garcia, F. Illas, and S. T. Bromley, “Size dependent structural and polymorphic transitions in ZnO: from nanocluster to bulk,”Nanoscale, vol. 9, pp. 10067–10074, July 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Size, Shape, Stability, and Color of Plasmonic Silver Nanoparticles,

    A. L. Gonz´ alez, C. Noguez, J. Ber´ anek, and A. S. Barnard, “Size, Shape, Stability, and Color of Plasmonic Silver Nanoparticles,”ACS Publications, Apr. 2014

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Clarifying stability, probability and pop- ulation in nanoparticle ensembles,

    A. S. Barnard, “Clarifying stability, probability and pop- ulation in nanoparticle ensembles,”Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 9983–9990, 2014. 9

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Applications of density functional the- ory and machine learning in nanomaterials: A review,

    N. N. Nyangiwe, “Applications of density functional the- ory and machine learning in nanomaterials: A review,” Next Materials, vol. 8, p. 100683, July 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Zinc Oxide Nanoparti- cles: Synthesis, Characterization, Modification, and Ap- plications in Food and Agriculture,

    X.-Q. Zhou, Z. Hayat, D.-D. Zhang, M.-Y. Li, S. Hu, Q. Wu, Y.-F. Cao, and Y. Yuan, “Zinc Oxide Nanoparti- cles: Synthesis, Characterization, Modification, and Ap- plications in Food and Agriculture,”Processes, vol. 11, p. 1193, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Green route biosyn- thesis: Characterization and catalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles,

    P. C. Nagajyothi, T. N. Minh An, T. V. M. Sreekanth, J.-i. Lee, D. Joo Lee, and K. D. Lee, “Green route biosyn- thesis: Characterization and catalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles,”Mater. Lett., vol. 108, pp. 160–163, Oct. 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    The Applications of Morphology Con- trolled ZnO in Catalysis,

    Y. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Bao, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, M. Fu, J. Wu, and D. Ye, “The Applications of Morphology Con- trolled ZnO in Catalysis,”Catalysts, vol. 6, p. 188, Nov. 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    ZnO nanoparticles via Moringa oleifera green synthesis: Physical properties & mechanism of for- mation,

    N. Matinise, X. G. Fuku, K. Kaviyarasu, N. Mayedwa, and M. Maaza, “ZnO nanoparticles via Moringa oleifera green synthesis: Physical properties & mechanism of for- mation,”Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 406, pp. 339–347, June 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: A Review on Its Applications in Dentistry,

    C. Pushpalatha, J. Suresh, V. S. Gayathri, S. V. Sowmya, D. Augustine, A. Alamoudi, B. Zidane, N. H. M. Albar, and S. Patil, “Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: A Review on Its Applications in Dentistry,”Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 10, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Exploring the Journey of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) toward Biomedical Applica- tions,

    F. Islam, S. Shohag, Md. J. Uddin, Md. R. Islam, M. H. Nafady, A. Akter, S. Mitra, A. Roy, T. B. Emran, and S. Cavalu, “Exploring the Journey of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) toward Biomedical Applica- tions,”Materials, vol. 15, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    A Mini Re- view of Antibacterial Properties of ZnO Nanoparticles,

    S. V. Gudkov, D. E. Burmistrov, D. A. Serov, M. B. Re- bezov, A. A. Semenova, and A. B. Lisitsyn, “A Mini Re- view of Antibacterial Properties of ZnO Nanoparticles,” Front. Phys., vol. 9, p. 641481, Mar. 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Compet- ing nucleation pathways in nanocrystal formation,

    C. R. Salazar, A. K. Ammothum Kandy, J. Furstoss, Q. Gromoff, J. Goniakowski, and J. Lam, “Compet- ing nucleation pathways in nanocrystal formation,”npj Comput. Mater., vol. 10, pp. 1–12, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    All-around local structure classification with su- pervised learning: The example of crystal phases and dis- locations in complex oxides,

    J. Furstoss, C. R. Salazar, P. Carrez, P. Hirel, and J. Lam, “All-around local structure classification with su- pervised learning: The example of crystal phases and dis- locations in complex oxides,”Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 309, p. 109480, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Nonclassical Nucleation of Zinc Oxide from a Physically Motivated Machine-Learning Approach,

    J. Goniakowski, S. Menon, G. Laurens, and J. Lam, “Nonclassical Nucleation of Zinc Oxide from a Physically Motivated Machine-Learning Approach,”J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 126, pp. 17456–17469, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 47, pp. 558–561, 1993

    work page 1993

  24. [24]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 54, pp. 11169–11186, 1996

    work page 1996

  25. [25]

    From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 59, pp. 1758–1775, 1999

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    Forma- tion Mechanism of Fe Nanocubes by Magnetron Sput- tering Inert Gas Condensation,

    J. Zhao, E. Baibuz, J. Vernieres, P. Grammatikopou- los, V. Jansson, M. Nagel, S. Steinhauer, M. Sowwan, A. Kuronen, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, “Forma- tion Mechanism of Fe Nanocubes by Magnetron Sput- tering Inert Gas Condensation,”ACS Nano, vol. 10, pp. 4684–4694, Apr. 2016

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales,

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. In ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, “LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales,”Comput. Phys. Commun...

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Structural, electronic, and spectral properties of six ZnO bulk poly- morphs,

    L. Sponza, J. Goniakowski, and C. Noguera, “Structural, electronic, and spectral properties of six ZnO bulk poly- morphs,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 91, p. 075126, Feb. 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Confine- ment effects in ultrathin ZnO polymorph films: Elec- tronic and optical properties,

    L. Sponza, J. Goniakowski, and C. Noguera, “Confine- ment effects in ultrathin ZnO polymorph films: Elec- tronic and optical properties,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93, p. 195435, May 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Ther- modynamics of Nanoparticles: Experimental Protocol Based on a Comprehensive Ginzburg-Landau Interpre- tation,

    D. Machon, L. Piot, D. Hapiuk, B. Masenelli, F. Demois- son, R. Piolet, M. Ariane, S. Mishra, S. Daniele, M. Hosni, N. Jouini, S. Farhat, and P. M´ elinon, “Ther- modynamics of Nanoparticles: Experimental Protocol Based on a Comprehensive Ginzburg-Landau Interpre- tation,”ACS Publications, Dec. 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Crystal Polymorphism Induced by Surface Tension,

    C. Schoonen and J. F. Lutsko, “Crystal Polymorphism Induced by Surface Tension,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 129, p. 246101, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Polarity of oxide surfaces and nanostructures,

    J. Goniakowski, F. Finocchi, and C. Noguera, “Polarity of oxide surfaces and nanostructures,”Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 71, p. 016501, Dec. 2007

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Polarity at the nanoscale,

    J. Goniakowski and C. Noguera, “Polarity at the nanoscale,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, p. 115413, Mar 2011

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Polarity in oxide nano- objects,

    C. Noguera and J. Goniakowski, “Polarity in oxide nano- objects,”Chemical Reviews, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 4073– 4105, 2013

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Machine learning potentials for extended systems: a perspective,

    J. Behler and G. Cs´ anyi, “Machine learning potentials for extended systems: a perspective,”Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 94, pp. 1–11, July 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Accurate Fourth-Generation Machine Learning Poten- tials by Electrostatic Embedding,

    T. W. Ko, J. A. Finkler, S. Goedecker, and J. Behler, “Accurate Fourth-Generation Machine Learning Poten- tials by Electrostatic Embedding,”J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 19, pp. 3567–3579, June 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Self-consistent determina- tion of long-range electrostatics in neural network poten- tials,

    A. Gao and R. C. Remsing, “Self-consistent determina- tion of long-range electrostatics in neural network poten- tials,”Nat. Commun., vol. 13, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Machine Learning In- teratomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics,

    D. M. Anstine and O. Isayev, “Machine Learning In- teratomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics,”J. Phys. Chem. A, vol. 127, pp. 2417–2431, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023