Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The third-order Hall response in a tunable 2D Dirac semimetal is much larger in the nodal-ring phase than in single- or double-node phases, especially near the band edge.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In a tunable 2D Dirac semimetal model, the Berry-connection-polarizability third-order Hall response is largest in the nodal-ring phase near the band edge, while the Berry-curvature-dipole second-order response is largest in the single-node phase.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection NR-phase TOH enhancement is forbidden by the model's rotational symmetry; the BCD comparison is real but the headline claim doesn't survive. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.20214 v2 pith:SPRMHSFE submitted 2025-11-25 cond-mat.mes-hall

Nonlinear Hall responses in tunable nodal Dirac semimetals

Akash Dey This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nonlinear Hall effectBerry curvature dipoleBerry connection polarizabilitythird-order Hall effectnodal-ring semimetalDirac semimetalquantum geometrytwo-dimensional semimetal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a tunable two-dimensional Dirac semimetal that can host single-node, double-node, or nodal-ring band structures. It finds that the second-order Hall response, driven by the Berry curvature dipole, is larger in the single-node phase than in the double-node phase, and vanishes in the nodal-ring phase where inversion symmetry is restored. The central result is that the third-order Hall response, driven by the Berry connection polarizability (BCP), becomes much larger in the nodal-ring phase when the Fermi energy lies near the band edge. If correct, this shows that the spatial distribution of the BCP in the Brillouin zone, not just its magnitude, controls the nonlinear response and suggests nodal-ring semimetals as promising platforms for enhanced third-order nonlinear transport.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the third-order Hall conductivity in a nodal-ring Dirac semimetal is parametrically enhanced near the band edge because the Berry connection polarizability tensor is sharply localized and anisotropic along the nodal ring, whereas in single- and double-node phases the BCP is more broadly spread around the nodal points. This localization prevents cancellation among tensor components in the transverse conductivity, leading to a large response near the band edge. The paper also establishes that the second-order Hall response from the Berry curvature dipole is larger in the single-node than the double-node phase, and vanishes in the nodal-ring phase due to restor

What carries the argument

The key objects are the Berry curvature dipole, which drives the second-order Hall effect, and the Berry connection polarizability (BCP) tensor, which drives the third-order Hall effect. The BCP measures how the interband Berry connection responds to changes in energy and is defined as the first-order field correction to the Berry connection. The distinguishing mechanism is the Brillouin-zone distribution of the BCP: for the nodal-ring phase, the ring-like denominator makes the BCP sharply concentrated on the ring, with strong momentum-dependent anisotropy from the momentum products in the numerator. This localization yields a large transverse third-order Hall conductivity that does not vani

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on keeping only the terms linear in the relaxation time τ in the third-order Hall conductivity, dropping the τ³ contribution; if that omitted term is comparable, the predicted phase hierarchy is not guaranteed.

What would settle it

Compute the full third-order Hall current from Eq. (13) including the τ³ term for the same model and check whether the nodal-ring phase still dominates near the band edge; alternatively, measure the third-order Hall voltage in a known single-node and a nodal-ring two-dimensional semimetal with comparable carrier densities and see which is larger near the band edge.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Nodal-ring semimetals become promising candidates for third-order Hall devices, since their response peaks near the band edge where the Fermi energy can be tuned.
  • The angular dependence of the transverse third-order Hall conductivity distinguishes nodal-ring phases from single- and double-node phases, with a nonzero response even at mirror-symmetric directions only in the ring phase.
  • Measuring the second-order Hall effect can discriminate between single-node (enhanced) and double-node (reduced) phases, while its absence indicates the inversion-symmetric nodal-ring phase.
  • The hierarchy of nonlinear responses can be switched by tuning the parameters that drive transitions between the nodal phases, offering a control knob for nonlinear transport.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the τ³ term discarded in deriving Eq. (14) is not negligible, the predicted phase hierarchy for the full third-order Hall response could change; evaluating the full expression from Eq. (13) would settle this.
  • The argument likely extends to three-dimensional nodal-line semimetals, where the ring becomes a line in momentum space and the BCP localization could produce even stronger enhancements.
  • A general design principle emerges: geometric quantities that are sharply localized near band crossings, rather than merely large in magnitude, give the strongest nonlinear responses—an idea that could guide material search beyond this model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear Hall responses in a two-dimensional Dirac semimetal model H = d(k)·σ with d = (λ(k²−k0²), γ k_y, 0). By tuning γ and k0, the model hosts single-node, double-node, and nodal-ring phases; a finite gap Δ is introduced for finite-density calculations. Using standard semiclassical Boltzmann transport, the authors derive Berry-curvature-dipole (BCD) contributions to the second-order Hall conductivity and Berry-connection-polarizability (BCP) contributions to the third-order Hall conductivity. They claim that the second-order Hall response is larger in the single-node than in the double-node phase and vanishes in the nodal-ring phase, while the third-order transverse Hall response is strongly enhanced in the nodal-ring phase near the band edge because the BCP becomes sharply localized and anisotropic around the nodal ring.

Significance. If the results were correct, the paper would provide a useful model study of how tunable nodal topology controls quantum-geometric nonlinear transport, with a concrete prediction of enhanced BCP-driven third-order Hall response in a nodal-ring semimetal. The authors make an explicit, falsifiable parameter-dependent prediction. The analytic BCP expressions and the phase classification are clearly presented. However, the central claim for the nodal-ring phase is invalid because the γ=0 model is rotationally invariant, which forbids the transverse third-order Hall response. The second-order Hall part may be sound, but it is not the advertised main result. Because the flagship prediction fails for symmetry reasons, the manuscript in its current form cannot support its stated conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III; Sec. IV B, Eq. (19), Fig. 4(c)] For the nodal-ring phase γ=0, the Hamiltonian (15) depends only on k² (d_x=λ(k²−k0²), d_y=0, d_z=Δ), so it is invariant under k_y→−k_y and in fact under the full SO(2) rotation group. For an electric field along x, the mirror symmetry k_y→−k_y is a symmetry of the model; hence any transverse conductivity component with an odd number of y indices, notably χ_xyyy and χ_yxxx, must vanish. In Eq. (19), χ⊥(0)=χ_41=χ_yxxx and χ⊥(π/2)=−χ_14=−χ_xyyy, so both must be zero. More generally, rotational invariance forces the third-order current to be parallel to the electric field, so χ⊥(θ)≡0 for all θ. The text before Fig. 4(c) claims the opposite, and Fig. 4(c) shows nonzero χ⊥ at θ=0,π/2. This is an internal inconsistency, not a matter of interpretation: the numerical result violates the model's symmetry. The abstract's central claim of enhanced transverse third-order Hall response in the nodal-ri
  2. [Sec. II, Eqs. (13)–(14), Fig. 4] The numerical third-order Hall response is computed from Eq. (14), which retains only the terms linear in the relaxation time τ from Eq. (13). The τ³ term in Eq. (13) is dropped with the statement that the authors are interested only in the BCP-induced current. No order-of-magnitude estimate or numerical comparison is given for the discarded τ³ contribution. Since Figs. 4 are presented as the total transverse third-order Hall conductivity for each phase, the phase hierarchy could be quantitatively altered or even reversed if the τ³ Drude-like contribution is comparable. The authors should either compute the full expression, estimate the relative magnitude, or clearly relabel Figs. 4 as the BCP-only τ-linear contribution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV A, Eq. (16)] The velocity components v_x and v_y are written as v_x=2k_x d_x/ϵ and v_y=k_y(2d_x+γ²)/ϵ. These expressions assume λ=1. Since Eq. (16) keeps λ explicitly, please state that the numerical and velocity expressions use λ=1, or restore the λ factors.
  2. [Sec. IV B, text before Fig. 4] The sentence 'the system has rotational symmetry, which leads to all the individual TOH conductivity components to be nonzero' is misleading: rotational symmetry imposes relations among components and, for the transverse combination, forces it to vanish. See the first major comment.
  3. [General] Typos: 'MODEL HAMIL TONIAN' in the section heading; 'unlikely to the other two phases' should read 'unlike'; the acronym SOH/SOHE is used inconsistently.
  4. [References] References 27 and 46 appear to cite the same work ('Nodal-line semimetals and their variance') in different venues; please harmonize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: the paper's responses follow from standard published formulas applied to an explicitly stated model Hamiltonian, with no fitted parameters or self-cited uniqueness arguments.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity. The second-order and third-order conductivities are computed by substituting the model Hamiltonian H = d(k)·σ with d(k)=(λ(k²−k₀²), γk_y, Δ) into standard published expressions: the Berry curvature dipole from Eq. (7) and the BCP tensor from Eqs. (9) and (14). The BCP components in Eq. (18) are explicit analytic functions of k, λ, γ, k₀, and Δ; the phase hierarchy (SN vs DN vs NR) follows algebraically from these formulas and the chosen parameter values, not from any fit to experimental data or from any quantity that is defined in terms of the claimed output. The only approximations, such as neglecting the τ³ term in Eq. (13) with the stated rationale 'Since we are interested in the BCP induced TOH current, we will only consider the terms proportional to τ', are modeling choices that affect quantitative accuracy and correctness risk, not circularity. The references to prior work are to standard formalism papers (e.g., Sodemann and Fu, Liu et al., Nag et al.) and are not self-citations that carry the central claim. The one self-citation (Ref. [20]) is an unrelated phonon-dynamics example and is not load-bearing. The skeptical observation that the γ=0 NR phase may forbid the transverse response by symmetry is a correctness/symmetry objection about whether the numerics match the model's symmetries, not a circularity in which the input is equivalent to the output by construction. Therefore no specific circular step can be identified, and the appropriate score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation relies on standard semiclassical transport and quantum-geometry formulas, plus a hand-chosen two-band model. There are seven hand-set model/numerical parameters and no new entities. The only ad hoc structural input is the retention of tau-linear terms only when evaluating the third-order response.

free parameters (7)
  • Delta (gap parameter) = 0.1 eV in numerics
    Opens a small gap so Berry curvature and BCP are finite near nodes; chosen by hand, not measured.
  • lambda (inverse band mass) = 1.0 eV·A^2
    Sets the energy scale of the quadratic term; fixed by hand in all phases.
  • gamma (Fermi velocity along y) = 1.0 eV·A in SN/DN, 0 in NR
    Tuned to realize single-node, double-node, or nodal-ring phase; chosen by hand.
  • k0 (nodal position / ring radius) = 0 in SN, 1.0 A^-1 in DN/NR
    Sets the location or radius of band crossings; chosen by hand.
  • tau (scattering time)
    Appears in second- and third-order conductivities but no numerical value is given in the manuscript.
  • T (temperature) = 50 K in TOH plots
    Used for Fermi-Dirac distribution; no temperature dependence scan reported.
  • EF (Fermi energy values) = e.g., 0.11 eV near band edge
    Fermi energy is varied to probe band-edge enhancement; full set of values not stated.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Eq. (15) is a valid low-energy model for 2D Dirac/nodal-ring semimetals.
    The entire calculation uses H = d(k)·sigma with d = (lambda(k^2-k0^2), gamma ky, Delta); no material-specific derivation is given beyond citing Refs [46,47,54,55].
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Boltzmann transport with relaxation-time approximation and the ansatz f(k)=Σ (tau E·grad)^n f0(epsilon_tilde) is valid.
    Invoked in Sec. II, Eqs. (11)-(12), following Ref [52]; assumes weak fields and a single relaxation time.
  • domain assumption Wave-packet equations of motion with higher-order field corrections to energy and Berry curvature apply.
    Eqs. (2)-(3) and the first-order wavefunction correction Eq. (8) follow Refs [13,49]; the first-order energy correction is declared gauge-dependent and dropped.
  • ad hoc to paper Only the tau-linear terms in Eq. (13) need be retained for the BCP-induced third-order Hall response.
    The paper states 'we will only consider the terms proportional to tau' without estimating the tau^3 contribution; this truncation is load-bearing for the reported TOH values.
  • domain assumption The symmetry assignments (TRS preserved, inversion broken in SN/DN and preserved in NR) are correct for the model.
    Used to argue BCD vanishes in NR and certain TOH tensor components vanish under mirror symmetry M_x; stated in Sec. III.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear Hall responses in tunable nodal Dirac semimetals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SPRMHSFE

@misc{pith2026251120214,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear Hall responses in tunable nodal Dirac semimetals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SPRMHSFE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20214}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate the nonlinear Hall responses in tunable two-dimensional Dirac materials. In particular, we study quantum geometry-driven second and third-order nonlinear responses in a time-reversal symmetric Dirac semimetal that can host single-node, double-node, and nodal-ring depending on the model parameters. We find that the second-order Hall (SOH) response, which originates from the Berry curvature dipole, is enhanced in the single-node semimetallic phase as compared to the double-node case when inversion symmetry is broken. In contrast, the SOH response vanishes in the nodal-ring semimetal as the inversion symmetry is retained. Notably, the third-order Hall response due to Berry connection polarizability becomes much larger in the nodal-ring Dirac semimetal, especially when the Fermi energy lies near the band edge, than in the single- and double-node Dirac semimetals. The reason for this contrasting behavior is attributed to the distinct distribution of the Berry connection polarizability in the Brillouin zone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20214 by Akash Dey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Energy spectrum of Eq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a,b) Density plots showing the Berry curvature (Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Density plots of the BCP tensor components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The transverse TOH conductivity for different nodal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing persistent spin textures through nonlinear magnetotransport

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Persistent spin textures isolate spin-rotation quantum geometry in nonlinear magnetotransport, yielding direction-independent responses as a distinctive signature even with symmetry-breaking terms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Confinement-induced berry phase and helicity-dependent photocurrents, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 026805 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Morimoto, S

    T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Semiclassical theory of nonlinear magneto-optical re- sponses with applications to topological dirac/weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B94, 245121 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    C. Zeng, S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Non- linear nernst effect in bilayer wte 2, Phys. Rev. B100, 245102 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    D. C. Brody and L. P. Hughston, Geometric quantum mechanics, Journal of Geometry and Physics38, 19 (2001). 7

    2001

  7. [7]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  8. [8]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect as a topological fermi-liquid prop- erty, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  9. [9]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Cao, A.-Q

    Z.-Y. Cao, A.-Q. Wang, X.-Y. Liu, T.-Y. Zhao, D. Yu, and Z.-M. Liao, Nonlinear hall effect and scaling law anal- ysis in twisted bilayer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. B111, 125407 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Huang, Z

    M. Huang, Z. Wu, J. Hu, X. Cai, E. Li, L. An, X. Feng, Z. Ye, N. Lin, K. T. Law, and N. Wang, Giant nonlinear hall effect in twisted bilayer wse2, National Science Review10, nwac232 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/10/4/nwac232/50268204/nwac232.pdf

    2022

  12. [12]

    G. Sala, M. T. Mercaldo, K. Domi, S. Gariglio, M. Cuoco, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, The quantum metric of electrons with spin-momentum locking, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06659 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic second-order anoma- lous hall effect and its application in compensated anti- ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277202 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, X. Feng, C. Xiao, W. Wu, S. Lai, W.-b. Gao, and S. A. Yang, Berry connection po- larizability tensor and third-order hall effect, Phys. Rev. B105, 045118 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal cumnas, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    S. M. Young and C. L. Kane, Dirac semimetals in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 126803 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Borisenko, Q

    S. Borisenko, Q. Gibson, D. Evtushinsky, V. Zabolotnyy, B. B¨ uchner, and R. J. Cava, Experimental realization of a three-dimensional dirac semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027603 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Liu, C.-M

    L. Liu, C.-M. Miao, Q.-F. Sun, and Y.-T. Zhang, Two- dimensional dirac semimetals with tunable edge states, Phys. Rev. B110, 245413 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Swain, A

    D. Swain, A. Dey, A. Roy, K. Saha, and S. D. Das, Nontrivial phonon dynamics and significant electron- phonon coupling of the high-frequency modes in a dirac semimetal, Phys. Rev. B111, 035143 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Type-ii weyl semimetals, Nature527, 495 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    L. Lu, Z. Wang, D. Ye, L. Ran, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Experimental ob- servation of weyl points, Science349, 622 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaa9273

    doi:10.1126/science.aaa9273 2015

  23. [23]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Topological semimetal and fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Q. Lu, P. S. Reddy, H. Jeon, A. R. Mazza, M. Brahlek, W. Wu, S. A. Yang, J. Cook, C. Conner, X. Zhang, et al., Realization of a two-dimensional weyl semimetal and topological fermi strings, Nature communications 15, 6001 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    C. Fang, Y. Chen, H.-Y. Kee, and L. Fu, Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B92, 081201 (2015)

    2015

  26. [26]

    S. Xue, M. Wang, Y. Li, S. Zhang, X. Jia, J. Zhou, Y. Shi, X. Zhu, Y. Yao, and J. Guo, Observation of nodal-line plasmons in zrsis, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186802 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Chang, Nodal-line semimetals and their variance, Materials Today Quantum8, 100057 (2025)

    P.-Y. Chang, Nodal-line semimetals and their variance, Materials Today Quantum8, 100057 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Hu, Proximity-induced superconductivity and an- dreev reflection on the surface of nodal weyl semimetals, Europhysics Letters149, 56001 (2025)

    X. Hu, Proximity-induced superconductivity and an- dreev reflection on the surface of nodal weyl semimetals, Europhysics Letters149, 56001 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Gao and J.-H

    M.-J. Gao and J.-H. An, Engineering rich two- dimensional higher-order topological phases by flux and periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B108, L241402 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    L. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Dai, X. Shen, L. Wang, and G. Liu, Two-dimensional weyl nodal-line semimetal in ad 0 ferromagnetic k 2N monolayer with a high curie temperature, Phys. Rev. B102, 125118 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    S.-Y. Yang, H. Yang, E. Derunova, S. S. Parkin, B. Yan, and M. N. Ali, Symmetry demanded topological nodal- line materials, Advances in Physics: X3, 1414631 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    J. Li, H. Wang, and H. Pan, Tunable topological phase transition from nodal-line semimetal to weyl semimetal by breaking symmetry, Phys. Rev. B104, 235136 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    G. Xu, H. Weng, Z. Wang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Chern semimetal and the quantized anomalous hall effect in hgcr2se4, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 186806 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, B. Singh, C.-H. Hsu, G. Bian, N. Alidoust, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, S. Zhang,et al., Room-temperature magnetic topolog- ical weyl fermion and nodal line semimetal states in half- metallic heusler co2tix (x= si, ge, or sn), Scientific reports 6, 38839 (2016)

    2016

  37. [37]

    J. Noky, Q. Xu, C. Felser, and Y. Sun, Large anomalous hall and nernst effects from nodal line symmetry break- ing in fe 2Mnx(x= p, as, sb), Phys. Rev. B99, 165117 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Ezawa, Second-order topological insulators and loop- nodal semimetals in transition metal dichalcogenides xte2 (x= mo, w), Scientific reports9, 5286 (2019)

    M. Ezawa, Second-order topological insulators and loop- nodal semimetals in transition metal dichalcogenides xte2 (x= mo, w), Scientific reports9, 5286 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    H. Chen, S. Zhang, W. Jiang, C. Zhang, H. Guo, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, F. Liu, and X. Niu, Prediction of two- dimensional nodal-line semimetals in a carbon nitride covalent network, Journal of Materials Chemistry A6, 11252 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    J.-L. Lu, W. Luo, X.-Y. Li, S.-Q. Yang, J.-X. Cao, X.-G. Gong, and H.-J. Xiang, Two-dimensional node- line semimetals in a honeycomb-kagome lattice*, Chinese Physics Letters34, 057302 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Y. Shao, Z. Sun, Y. Wang, C. Xu, R. Sankar, A. J. Breindel, C. Cao, M. M. Fogler, A. J. Mil- lis, F. Chou, Z. Li, T. Timusk, M. B. Maple, and D. N. Basov, Optical signatures of dirac nodal lines in nbas¡sub¿2¡/sub¿, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences116, 1168 (2019), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1809631115. 8

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1809631115 2019

  42. [42]

    C. H. Lee, H. H. Yap, T. Tai, G. Xu, X. Zhang, and J. Gong, Enhanced higher harmonic generation from nodal topology, Phys. Rev. B102, 035138 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    J. Jeon, T. Kim, J. Jang, H. Kim, M. Ozerov, J. S. Kim, H. Min, and E. Choi, Unveiling three types of fermions in a nodal ring topological semimetal through magneto- optical transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 086901 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced neg- ative magnetoresistance in 3d weyl semimetal taas, Phys. Rev. X5, 031023 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Balduini, A

    F. Balduini, A. Molinari, L. Rocchino, V. Hasse, C. Felser, M. Sousa, C. Zota, H. Schmid, A. G. Grushin, and B. Gotsmann, Intrinsic negative magnetoresistance from the chiral anomaly of multifold fermions, Nature Communications15, 6526 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Chang, Nodal-line semimetals and their variance (2025), arXiv:2507.02329 [cond-mat.str-el]

    P.-Y. Chang, Nodal-line semimetals and their variance (2025), arXiv:2507.02329 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Y.-J. Jin, R. Wang, J.-Z. Zhao, Y.-P. Du, C.-D. Zheng, L.-Y. Gan, J.-F. Liu, H. Xu, and S. Tong, The prediction of a family group of two-dimensional node-line semimet- als, Nanoscale9, 13112 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    Barati, H

    S. Barati, H. Rahimpoor, and S. H. Abedinpour, Quan- tum hall effect and optical magnetoconductivity of two- dimensional topological nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B111, 075125 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B91, 214405 (2015)

    2015

  50. [50]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Non- linear hall effects: Mechanisms and materials, Materials Today Electronics8, 100101 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    T. Nag, S. K. Das, C. Zeng, and S. Nandy, Third-order hall effect in the surface states of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B107, 245141 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. Mermin, Solid state, Physics (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston) Appendix C (1976)

    1976

  53. [53]

    Pal and T

    O. Pal and T. K. Ghosh, Polarization and third-order hall effect in iii-v semiconductor heterojunctions, Phys. Rev. B109, 035202 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Rahimpoor and S

    H. Rahimpoor and S. H. Abedinpour, Collective excita- tions and screening in two-dimensional tilted nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B109, 045120 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Pandey, D

    V. Pandey, D. Joy, D. Culcer, and P. Bhalla, Longitudinal dc conductivity in dirac nodal line semimetals: Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions, Phys. Rev. B110, 155108 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Berry curvature dipole and its strain engineering in lay- ered phosphorene, Materials Today Electronics6, 100076 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B108, L201405 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    S. S. Samal, S. Nandy, and K. Saha, Nonlinear transport without spin-orbit coupling or warping in two-dimensional dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B103, L201202 (2021)

    2021

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.