Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 90 references

The authors construct a three-dimensional non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity from a Lifshitz deformation and null reduction of chiral massless higher-spin gravity in AdS₄.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 20:10 UTC pith:YCRLL5JY

load-bearing objection Free sector checks out, but the advertised higher-spin suppression is a corollary of assumptions the paper itself flags — still worth a referee. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.20818 v2 pith:YCRLL5JY submitted 2025-11-25 hep-th

Three-dimensional non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity

Arpita Mitra , Debangshu Mukherjee , Tung Tran This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spin gravitynon-relativistic limitLifshitz deformationSchrödinger algebralight-cone gaugenull reductionmassive higher-spinholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that a four-dimensional chiral massless higher-spin gravity in AdS₄ can be dragged into a three-dimensional non-relativistic massive theory by a Lifshitz deformation and a null reduction. The resulting theory lives on a twisted torsional Schrödinger geometry and, crucially, has too few symmetries to fix all cubic couplings uniquely. To recover predictive power, the authors propose a simple interpolating mass–spin relation, s = α₀ + α₁ m^(2/z); at z = 2 this gives m_s ∝ s, and combined with a conserved mass combination it forces the total helicity Σh_a to vanish at large spin, so the 1/Γ(Σh_a) vertex factor suppresses cubic higher-spin interactions. They further conjecture that the holographic dual is a two-dimensional non-relativistic Landau–Ginzburg theory in the light-cone gauge, describing a two-fluid system with a λ-point in one spatial dimension. A sympathetic reader would care because this connects the mathematically rigid chiral higher-spin gravity to low-energy non-relativistic physics where high-spin states decouple.

Core claim

Starting from the light-cone description of chiral massless higher-spin gravity in AdS₄, the authors apply Lifshitz anisotropic scalings (x⁺ → λ^z x⁺, x⁻ → λ^(2−z) x⁻) to deform the metric into a twist-free torsional Schrödinger geometry, then compactify x⁻ to turn discrete momentum into a per-spin mass m_s. In the resulting 3d non-relativistic theory on deformed AdS₃, the dynamical boost generators that fixed 4d couplings are absent, so the cubic vertices are only partially determined. The paper's central constructive claim is that the surviving part of the vertices, together with the proposed mass–spin relation s = α₀ + α₁ m^(2/z) (which at z = 2 yields m_s ∝ s), implies Σh_a = 0 for large

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the null-deformation/reduction pipeline for the light-cone geometry: Lifshitz scaling deforms the exact AdS₄ metric into a twist-free torsional Schrödinger geometry with a 'clock' form e⁺_μ, and compactifying the contracted x⁻ direction converts discrete momentum into a spin-dependent mass m_s. On top of that sits the proposed mass–spin relation s = α₀ + α₁ m^(2/z) — at z = 2, m_s ∝ s — which, together with the replacement rule β_a → sign(h_a)m_s(a) and the assumed p₊-conservation Σ sign(h_a)m_a = 0, makes the total helicity Σh_a vanish for large spins, rendering the 1/Γ(Σh_a) factor in the cubic vertex amplitude (5.5) trivial.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the paper's self-declared 'rather strong assumption' that after null reduction massive spinning particles behave as composite bodies, giving m_s ∝ s at z = 2, together with the unproven replacement of β_a by sign(h_a)m_a and the assumed conservation Σ sign(h_a)m_a = 0; if any of these fails, the large-spin suppression of cubic interactions collapses.

What would settle it

Construct the full cubic vertex of the 3d theory including the 'corrections' the paper leaves undetermined, and check whether the 1/Γ(Σh_a) suppression survives at large spin. A simpler check: test the mass–spin relation m_s ∝ s inside the same Lifshitz-plus-compactification framework already at free-field level, where masses are discrete light-cone momenta — if the relation is violated there, the suppression does not follow.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A consistent 3d non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity exists on deformed AdS₃, with a kinetic term first-order in time and masses arising from light-cone momentum.
  • The 3d theory is genuinely massive and non-topological: higher-spin fields carry two physical degrees of freedom, unlike topologically massive gravity.
  • At z = 2, large-spin cubic interactions vanish (Σh_a = 0), so the theory automatically decouples the high-spin tail, matching the expectation that higher-spin states do not appear at low energies.
  • The cubic couplings are not uniquely fixed by symmetry; holographic correlation functions may constrain the undetermined corrections.
  • If the holographic conjecture is correct, the boundary dual is a 2d non-relativistic Landau–Ginzburg theory whose two-fluid/λ-point phenomenology can be studied from the bulk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The suppression argument suggests a general principle: in non-relativistic reductions, Regge-like trajectories may dynamically decouple high spins, offering a bottom-up explanation for the absence of massless higher-spin states at low energies.
  • The mass–spin relation s = α₀ + α₁ m^(2/z) is heuristic; if it could be derived from the null reduction itself rather than assumed, the suppression claim would become a theorem. The paper leaves that derivation to future work.
  • A concrete test would be to compute the complete 3-point function including the undetermined 'corrections' and check numerically that it vanishes at large spin; the paper's own Appendix B indicates the calculation is heavy but in principle doable.
  • The two-fluid/λ-point conjecture implies a condensed-matter check: one-dimensional superfluids near their critical point might exhibit the suppressed higher-spin correlators predicted here.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-relativistic (NR) three-dimensional chiral massive higher-spin gravity obtained by applying a Lifshitz anisotropic scaling and a subsequent null reduction to the four-dimensional massless chiral higher-spin gravity in AdS4. It computes the free kinetic sector on a twist-free torsional Schrödinger background, derives bulk-to-boundary propagators and two-point functions, and discusses cubic vertices in the light-front formalism. It then introduces an approximate mass-spin relation, observes that at z=2 and large spin the relation implies Σ h_a = 0 and hence suppression of cubic vertices via 1/Γ(Σ h_a), and conjectures a 2d NR Landau-Ginzburg dual describing a two-fluid system with a λ-point. The paper is exploratory and candid about the incompleteness of the interacting sector.

Significance. The free-field part of the construction is a useful contribution: the radial solution (4.6)–(4.10), the boundary conformal dimensions (4.12)–(4.13), and the two-point function (5.11)/(B.15) are verified and match known Schrödinger-holography results. The observation that higher-spin interactions are suppressed at large spin is, however, not a consequence of the Lifshitz deformation/null reduction alone; it rests on the assumed mass-spin relation (5.19) and the helicity-sign replacement (5.7). As such, the advertised suppression is a conditional observation, not an established feature of the construction. If the assumptions are ultimately derived, the paper would provide a new NR massive HSGRA and a plausible holographic dual; in its current form the interacting-sector claims are not fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (5.19)] The mass-spin relation s = α_0 + α_1 m^{2/z} is introduced as “a rather strong assumption” and is not derived from the deformation/reduction. The suppression of higher-spin cubic vertices at large spin is a direct algebraic consequence of this relation together with (5.17): at z=2, m_s ∝ s, so Σ h_a = 0 and 1/Γ(Σ h_a) trivializes. The paper’s own labeling makes clear this is an input, not an output. To make the suppression claim load-bearing, the relation should be derived (or at least justified within the null-reduction framework), or the claim should be reframed as conditional.
  2. [§5, Eq. (5.7)] The replacement β_a → sign(h_a) m_s(a) is not the standard null-reduction rule. In a genuine compactification, the KK momentum β_a is an integer m_a (or its dimensionless version) whose conservation is Σ m_a = 0, independent of helicity; the physical mass is |m_a|. The sign(h_a) insertion is a new truncation that ties the sign of the compactified momentum to helicity. This is exactly the step that permits (5.17) to yield Σ h_a = 0 when combined with (5.20). Without a derivation of (5.7) from the reduction, the central suppression claim is built in rather than derived.
  3. [§4.3/§5.1, Eq. (5.10)] The cubic vertex is only partially known: the paper states “corrections” are unknown and the 3-point function is not exhibited (App. B.2: “we refrain ourselves from exhibiting the final result”). The suppression argument applies to the known piece V_3' ≈ 1/Γ(H), but the full vertex may contain correction terms that are not suppressed. The claim that “there will be no cubic interactions” for large spins therefore cannot be substantiated without controlling these corrections or explicitly restricting the claim to the leading part of the vertex.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.1] Typo: “Laudau-Ginzburg” should be “Landau-Ginzburg”.
  2. [Abstract] The statement that the NR vertices are “less constrained than the ones of the original 4d chiral massless theory” is true, but the abstract should also make clear that this means the cubic couplings are not uniquely fixed; otherwise the reader may not appreciate the limitation until §4.3.
  3. [§4.3] The notation N_P = P ∂_P, N_r = r ∂_r, and the counting argument around (4.19) are terse; a brief explanation of why the Hamiltonian P_n^- has mass dimension 2 would improve readability.
  4. [§5.2] In (5.19), the dimensions of α_0 and α_1 are not specified; please state the units of m and of the slopes so that the interpolation formula is dimensionally consistent.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The advertised suppression of higher-spin interactions reduces to the assumed mass-spin relation (5.19) plus the hand-imposed replacement (5.7); the free-field/propagator parts are self-contained.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract; §5.2, Eqs. (5.17)–(5.20)]
    "Anticipating higher-spin interactions should be suppressed, we propose a simple approximate mass-spin relation which interpolates between the relativistic and non-relativistic regimes. With the proposed mass-spin relation, we observe that that higher-spin interactions indeed become suppressed at large spins... Let us make a rather strong assumption... we can consider s=α_0+α_1 m^{2/z}... Observe that at z=2, and for sufficiently large s, m_s∝s. This implies that Σ_a h_a=0 for sufficiently large spins in 3d via (5.17). Thus, there will be no cubic interactions in this case, as the coupling cons"

    The central 'observation'—no cubic interactions because H=Σh_a=0 makes 1/Γ(H) vanish—is obtained by feeding (5.19) into (5.17) under the sign convention (5.7). At z=2 the relation says m_s∝s=|h_a|, so (5.17), Σ sign(h_a)m_s(a)=0, is exactly H=0. H is therefore not fixed by the Lifshitz deformation or null reduction; it is the assumed mass-spin relation restated. The abstract announces that the relation was proposed 'anticipating' the suppression, so the derivation is self-fulfilling. The paper itself flags (5.19) as 'a rather strong assumption' and gives no independent derivation from the deformed geometry or from the compactification itself.

  2. other [§5, Eq. (5.7)]
    "Now, to drive chiral HSGRA from exact AdS4 to the deformed AdS3, we can simply replace β_a→sign(h_a)m_s(a), assuming that momentum conservation is preserved even after dimensional compactification."

    The suppression selection rule depends on this replacement. In a genuine null reduction along x^- (5.2), KK modes carry signed integers m_s with momentum conservation Σm_a=0; physical masses are |m_a| and the sign of the KK momentum is independent of helicity. The insertion of sign(h_a) imports helicity into the mass sign, and it is exactly this imported sign—combined with (5.19)—that converts (5.17) into H=0. Since no derivation of this sign rule from the null reduction or Lifshitz deformation is given, the large-spin suppression is an input of the prescription rather than a computed prediction.

full rationale

The bulk of the paper (Sections 2–4 and 5.1) is an honest adaptation of Metsaev's light-front formalism to a Lifshitz-deformed AdS4 background: the kinetic term, bulk-to-boundary propagator, Schr"odinger boundary algebra, and 2-point function are derived from the deformed geometry and benchmarked against independent prior work. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: the core references [28,51,53,58] are by other authors, and the authors' own citations ([14,16,85–87]) are peripheral. However, the paper's headline claim—the suppression of higher-spin interactions at large spin—does not follow from the deformation and reduction alone. Equation (5.19), explicitly labeled 'a rather strong assumption,' is introduced in the abstract as 'anticipating' the suppression, and then used with the hand-imposed replacement (5.7) to force H=Σh_a=0 and thereby trivialize 1/Γ(H). Thus the advertised selection rule reduces by construction to the assumed mass-spin relation and sign assignment. This is a genuine, partial circularity affecting the central advertised observation, while the free-field/kinetic and geometric parts retain independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central construction rests on a small number of inputs imported from prior literature (Lifshitz/Schrödinger holography, Metsaev's light-cone vertices) plus several ad hoc choices the paper introduces: the mass-spin relation, the β→sign(h)m replacement, and the conformal-dimension bookkeeping. The free-field/2-pt sector requires only standard math; the interacting sector is where the ad hoc content concentrates.

free parameters (3)
  • α₀ (mass-spin intercept) = not assigned
    Free intercept in (5.18)/(5.19); introduced without derivation and without a value; not needed for the qualitative suppression argument.
  • α₁ (mass-spin slope) = not assigned
    Controls the generic m^{2/z} scaling; assumed, not derived.
  • Spin-dependent masses m_s of the KK modes = not assigned (assumed m_s ∝ s at z=2)
    The KK masses are inputs (discrete light-cone momenta); the paper 'does not exclude' spin-dependence and then assumes it via (5.19) — the mass spectrum is not derived from the theory.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The Lifshitz-deformed metric (3.2) (with the frozen x⁻ direction) is a valid background for defining the NR gravity theory, preserving the Schrödinger algebra Sch_{z=2}(1).
    Imported from [55,58,61]; no equations of motion are solved in this paper to justify the background beyond the cited literature; the paper notes it breaks Lorentz invariance explicitly (§3).
  • domain assumption Light-front formalism and the Poisson-Dirac bracket (2.13) govern the canonical structure and vertex constraints.
    Taken wholesale from Metsaev [28] and Ponomarev's review [44]; the NR generalization of the constraint rK,Ds=D (4.17) is asserted rather than proven.
  • ad hoc to paper Mass-spin relation s = α₀ + α₁ m^{2/z} (5.19), interpolating between s~m² (z=1) and s~m (z=2).
    Introduced 'anticipating' suppression (§5.2) with heuristic classical spinning-sphere/string pictures; it carries the entire large-spin suppression claim and is flagged by the authors as 'a rather strong assumption'.
  • ad hoc to paper Vertex reduction rule β_a → sign(h_a) m_s(a) (5.7) with p₊ momentum conservation preserved after compactification (5.17).
    Stated as 'we can simply replace' (§5); footnote 11 concedes it differs from standard relativistic compactifications [72,73].
  • ad hoc to paper Conformal-dimension assignment Δ₀=Δ₊+1 and Δₛ=Δ₋+1 in the Metsaev frame (§4.2).
    Chosen 'in the same spirit with Flato-Fronsdal theorem'; which root goes to which field is a by-hand choice that drives the vertex derivative counting (4.26).
  • ad hoc to paper AdS/CFT survives the NR deformation; the boundary dual is a compactified chiral CS-matter theory, conjectured to be a 2d NR Landau-Ginzburg theory describing a two-fluid system with a λ-point (§6).
    Explicitly a conjecture; no derivation or falsifiable prediction (e.g., a critical exponent) is provided.
  • standard math Standard integral identities, e.g., Gradshteyn-Ryzhik 6.578 for the J-K integrals (B.20).
    Used in the 3-pt computation sketch.
invented entities (2)
  • Twist-free torsional Schrödinger geometry with torsion T^ρ_{μν} = (υ²L/r⁴)σ_{[μ}δ^ρ_{ν]} (3.20) no independent evidence
    purpose: Background on which massless AdS₄ fields become massive; the torsion 'Higgs'-like mechanism generates the NR masses.
    The deformed metric is known ([58,61]), but the torsion interpretation and its role as the mass-generating mechanism is the paper's own construction and is not checked against an independent observable.
  • 2d non-relativistic Landau-Ginzburg dual describing a two-fluid system with a λ-point in one spatial dimension no independent evidence
    purpose: Conjectured holographic dual completing the theory where bulk constraints fail.
    Purely conjectural (§6): no specific operator map, no critical exponent, no falsifiable prediction beyond the conjecture itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26901 in / 27745 out tokens · 272691 ms · 2026-08-03T20:10:14.806841+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We obtain a non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity in a deformed $AdS_3$ spacetime by applying a Lifshitz deformation and subsequent null reduction to chiral massless higher-spin gravity in $AdS_4$. Intriguingly, the vertices of this non-relativistic theory are less constrained than the ones of the original $4d$ chiral massless theory since we do not have enough dynamical generators to fix the couplings uniquely. Anticipating higher-spin interactions should be suppressed, we propose a simple approximate mass-spin relation which interpolates between the relativistic and non-relativistic regimes. With the proposed mass-spin relation, we observe that that higher-spin interactions indeed become suppressed at large spins, consistent with low-energy physics. We conjecture that the holographic dual of the non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity proposed in this work is a $2d$ non-relativistic Landau-Ginzburg theory in the light-cone gauge. This non-relativistic theory is expected to describe a two-fluid system with a $\lambda$-point constrained in one spatial dimension.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jackiw,Introducing scale symmetry,Phys

    R. Jackiw,Introducing scale symmetry,Phys. Today25N1(1972) 23

    1972

  2. [2]

    C. R. Hagen,Scale and conformal transformations in galilean-covariant field theory,Phys. Rev. D5(1972) 377

    1972

  3. [3]

    Niederer,The maximal kinematical invariance group of the free Schrodinger equation., Helv

    U. Niederer,The maximal kinematical invariance group of the free Schrodinger equation., Helv. Phys. Acta45(1972) 802

    1972

  4. [4]

    Duval, M

    C. Duval, M. Henkel, P. Horvathy, S. Rouhani and P. Zhang,Schr¨ odinger Symmetry: A Historical Review,Int. J. Theor. Phys.63(2024) 184 [2403.20316]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Henkel,Schrodinger invariance in strongly anisotropic critical systems,J

    M. Henkel,Schrodinger invariance in strongly anisotropic critical systems,J. Statist. Phys.75 (1994) 1023 [hep-th/9310081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    D. T. Son and M. Wingate,General coordinate invariance and conformal invariance in nonrelativistic physics: Unitary Fermi gas,Annals Phys.321(2006) 197 [cond-mat/0509786]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Hoyos and D

    C. Hoyos and D. T. Son,Hall Viscosity and Electromagnetic Response,Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 066805 [1109.2651]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Geracie, M

    M. Geracie, M. Goykhman and D. T. Son,Dense Chern-Simons Matter with Fermions at Large N,JHEP04(2016) 103 [1511.04772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Nastase,String Theory Methods for Condensed Matter Physics

    H. Nastase,String Theory Methods for Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2017, 10.1017/9781316847978

    work page doi:10.1017/9781316847978 2017

  10. [10]

    D. T. Son,Newton-Cartan Geometry and the Quantum Hall Effect,1306.0638

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Jensen,On the coupling of Galilean-invariant field theories to curved spacetime,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 011 [1408.6855]

    K. Jensen,On the coupling of Galilean-invariant field theories to curved spacetime,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 011 [1408.6855]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Geracie, K

    M. Geracie, K. Prabhu and M. M. Roberts,Curved non-relativistic spacetimes, Newtonian gravitation and massive matter,J. Math. Phys.56(2015) 103505 [1503.02682]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Geracie, K

    M. Geracie, K. Prabhu and M. M. Roberts,Fields and fluids on curved non-relativistic spacetimes,JHEP08(2015) 042 [1503.02680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Banerjee, A

    R. Banerjee, A. Mitra and P. Mukherjee,Localization of the Galilean symmetry and dynamical realization of Newton-Cartan geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 045010 [1407.3617]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Banerjee, A

    R. Banerjee, A. Mitra and P. Mukherjee,A new formulation of non-relativistic diffeomorphism invariance,Phys. Lett. B737(2014) 369 [1404.4491]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Mitra,Nonrelativistic fluids on scale covariant Newton–Cartan backgrounds,Int

    A. Mitra,Nonrelativistic fluids on scale covariant Newton–Cartan backgrounds,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1750206 [1508.03207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Banerjee and P

    R. Banerjee and P. Mukherjee,Subtleties of nonrelativistic reduction and applications,Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 1 [1801.08373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Hartong, N

    J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Review on Non-Relativistic Gravity,Front. in Phys.11 (2023) 1116888 [2212.11309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Campoleoni and S

    A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Carrollian and Galilean conformal higher-spin algebras in any dimensions,JHEP02(2022) 150 [2110.07794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Coraddu and S

    M. Coraddu and S. Mignemi,The Nonrelativistic limit of the Magueijo-Smolin model of deformed special relativity,EPL91(2010) 51002 [0911.4241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Jafari and B

    N. Jafari and B. Shukirgaliyev,Nonrelativistic limits of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations in the Amelino-Camelia DSR,Phys. Lett. B853(2024) 138693

    2024

  22. [22]

    D. T. Son,Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 046003 [0804.3972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. Burdet, H. K¨ unzle and M. Perrin,Bargmann structures and newton-cartan theory,Physical Review D31(1985) 1841

    1985

  24. [24]

    Ponomarev and E

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov,Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,J. Phys. A50(2017) 095401 [1609.04655]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson and L. Brink,Cubic Interaction Terms for Arbitrary Spin, Nucl. Phys. B227(1983) 31

    1983

  26. [26]

    R. R. Metsaev,Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 359

    1991

  27. [27]

    R. R. Metsaev,S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 2411

    1991

  28. [28]

    R. R. Metsaev,Light-cone gauge cubic interaction vertices for massless fields in AdS(4),Nucl. Phys. B936(2018) 320 [1807.07542]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Sharapov, A

    A. Sharapov, A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, A. Sukhanov et al., Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,JHEP09(2022) 134 [2205.07794]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Sharapov and E

    A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov,Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories,Nucl. Phys. B985(2022) 115982 [2205.15293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Ponomarev,Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,JHEP12(2017) 141 [1710.00270]

    D. Ponomarev,Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,JHEP12(2017) 141 [1710.00270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Monteiro,From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras, JHEP03(2023) 062 [2212.11266]

    R. Monteiro,From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras, JHEP03(2023) 062 [2212.11266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Krasnov, E

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov and T. Tran,Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,JHEP08 (2021) 076 [2105.12782]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Herfray, K

    Y. Herfray, K. Krasnov and E. Skvortsov,Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space,JHEP01(2023) 158 [2210.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Adamo and T

    T. Adamo and T. Tran,Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality,Lett. Math. Phys.113(2023) 50 [2210.07130]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Neiman,Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs

    Y. Neiman,Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs. lightcone,JHEP07(2024) 178 [2404.18589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Tran,Anomaly-free twistorial higher-spin theories,2505.13785

    T. Tran,Anomaly-free twistorial higher-spin theories,2505.13785

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Ivanovskiy and D

    V. Ivanovskiy and D. Ponomarev,Light-cone formalism for a point particle in a higher-spin background,JHEP09(2023) 014 [2306.13441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Ivanovskiy and D

    V. Ivanovskiy and D. Ponomarev,Inconsistency of point-particle dynamics on higher-spin backgrounds: massive particles,2506.13976

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Serrani,On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,JHEP08(2025) 032 [2505.12839]

    M. Serrani,On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,JHEP08(2025) 032 [2505.12839]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Serrani,Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,2508.16804

    M. Serrani,Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality,2508.16804

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    R. R. Metsaev,Interacting massive and massless arbitrary spin fields in 4d flat space,Nucl. Phys. B984(2022) 115978 [2206.13268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    R. R. Metsaev,Light-cone gauge massive and partially-massless fields in AdS(4),Phys. Lett. B 839(2023) 137790 [2212.14728]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Ponomarev,Basic Introduction to Higher-Spin Theories,Int

    D. Ponomarev,Basic Introduction to Higher-Spin Theories,Int. J. Theor. Phys.62(2023) 146 [2206.15385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia,Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 031601 [1805.00048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Skvortsov, T

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia,More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 106001 [2002.08487]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Skvortsov and T

    E. Skvortsov and T. Tran,One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,JHEP07 (2020) 021 [2004.10797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Tran,Chiral higher-spin symmetry of the celestial twistor sphere,2507.00340

    T. Tran,Chiral higher-spin symmetry of the celestial twistor sphere,2507.00340

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    S. Jain, D. K. S. and E. Skvortsov,Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106017 [2405.00773]

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Aharony, R

    O. Aharony, R. R. Kalloor and T. Kukolj,A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP10(2024) 051 [2405.01647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Skvortsov,Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,JHEP06(2019) 058 [1811.12333]

    E. Skvortsov,Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,JHEP06(2019) 058 [1811.12333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Lang and Y

    J. Lang and Y. Neiman,Theories of the gravity+gauge type in de Sitter space,2506.16707. – 29 –

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    R. R. Metsaev,Light cone form of field dynamics in Anti-de Sitter space-time and AdS / CFT correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B563(1999) 295 [hep-th/9906217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Hartong and J. Rosseel,Torsional Newton–Cartan geometry and the Schr¨ odinger algebra,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 135017 [1409.5555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Taylor,Lifshitz holography,Class

    M. Taylor,Lifshitz holography,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 033001 [1512.03554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    R. R. Metsaev,Shadows, currents and AdS,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 106010 [0805.3472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    R. R. Metsaev,Cubic interaction vertices of massive and massless higher spin fields,Nucl. Phys. B759(2006) 147 [hep-th/0512342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  58. [58]

    Balasubramanian and J

    K. Balasubramanian and J. McGreevy,Gravity duals for non-relativistic CFTs,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 061601 [0804.4053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  59. [59]

    Balasubramanian and K

    K. Balasubramanian and K. Narayan,Lifshitz spacetimes from AdS null and cosmological solutions,JHEP08(2010) 014 [1005.3291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    Korovin, K

    Y. Korovin, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor,Lifshitz as a deformation of Anti-de Sitter,JHEP08 (2013) 026 [1304.7776]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Kachru, X

    S. Kachru, X. Liu and M. Mulligan,Gravity duals of Lifshitz-like fixed points,Phys. Rev. D 78(2008) 106005 [0808.1725]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Guica, K

    M. Guica, K. Skenderis, M. Taylor and B. C. van Rees,Holography for Schrodinger backgrounds,JHEP02(2011) 056 [1008.1991]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Cartan,Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee

    E. Cartan,Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee. (premi` ere partie),Annales Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup.40(1923) 325

    1923

  64. [64]

    Gutperle, E

    M. Gutperle, E. Hijano and J. Samani,Lifshitz black holes in higher spin gravity,JHEP04 (2014) 020 [1310.0837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Beccaria, M

    M. Beccaria, M. Gutperle, Y. Li and G. Macorini,Higher spin Lifshitz theories and the Korteweg-de Vries hierarchy,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 085005 [1504.06555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    C. A. Fuertes and S. Moroz,Correlation functions in the non-relativistic AdS/CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 106004 [0903.1844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    Volovich and C

    A. Volovich and C. Wen,Correlation Functions in Non-Relativistic Holography,JHEP05 (2009) 087 [0903.2455]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    R. G. Leigh and N. Nguyen hoang,Real-Time Correlators and Non-Relativistic Holography, JHEP11(2009) 010 [0904.4270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [69]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [70]

    Flato and C

    M. Flato and C. Fronsdal,One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6.,Lett. Math. Phys.2(1978) 421

    1978

  71. [71]

    Skenderis, M

    K. Skenderis, M. Taylor and B. C. van Rees,Topologically Massive Gravity and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,JHEP09(2009) 045 [0906.4926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [72]

    R. R. Metsaev,Cubic interactions of arbitrary spin fields in 3d flat space,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 445401 [2005.12224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Skvortsov, T

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia,A Stringy theory in three dimensions and Massive Higher Spins,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 126010 [2006.05809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic press, 2014. – 30 –

    2014

  75. [75]

    R. R. Metsaev,IIB supergravity and various aspects of light cone formalism in AdS space-time, in3rd International Workshop on Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries, 7, 1999,hep-th/0002008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  76. [76]

    Takabayasi,Relativistic mechanics of confined particles as extended model of hadrons: the bilocal case,Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement67(1979) 1

    T. Takabayasi,Relativistic mechanics of confined particles as extended model of hadrons: the bilocal case,Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement67(1979) 1

    1979

  77. [77]

    Takabayasi,Theory of relativistic string and super-wave equation

    T. Takabayasi,Theory of relativistic string and super-wave equation. ii,Progress of Theoretical Physics51(1974) 571

    1974

  78. [78]

    Kojima,Relativistic two-particle system and spin-mass relations of meson,Progress of Theoretical Physics61(1979) 960

    S. Kojima,Relativistic two-particle system and spin-mass relations of meson,Progress of Theoretical Physics61(1979) 960

    1979

  79. [79]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S. P. Trivedi, S. R. Wadia and X. Yin,Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 2112 [1110.4386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    C. Y.-R. Chen, E. Joung, K. Mkrtchyan and J. Yoon,Higher-order chiral scalar from boundary reduction of 3d higher-spin gravity,JHEP05(2025) 186 [2501.16463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.