pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.21240 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-26 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Search for signatures of electroweakinos with photons, jets, and large missing transverse momentum in sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 05:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords supersymmetryelectroweakinosneutralinosgauginosATLASmissing transverse momentumphotonsgauge-mediated SUSY
0
0 comments X

The pith

No excess is observed in the search for electroweakino signatures with photons, jets and missing momentum, excluding gaugino masses up to 1.2 TeV in gauge-mediated supersymmetry models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a search for final states containing at least one isolated high transverse-momentum photon, jets and large missing transverse momentum in 140 fb inverse of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector. This final state can arise in gauge-mediated supersymmetric models when a pair of neutralinos, formed from mixed binos and higgsinos, each decays to a gravitino plus either a photon, a Higgs boson or a Z boson. No significant excess above the Standard Model background is found in the full Run-2 dataset. The absence of signal is interpreted to set 95 percent confidence level exclusion limits on the masses of the gauginos, which reach 1.2 TeV for some choices of branching ratios, and to place limits on the branching ratios themselves as a function of mass.

Core claim

In gauge-mediated supersymmetric models a pair of mixed bino-higgsino neutralinos can be produced and decay such that one yields a photon and gravitino while the other yields a Higgs boson, Z boson or photon plus gravitino. Analysis of the full Run-2 ATLAS dataset shows no significant excess over Standard Model backgrounds, permitting exclusion of gaugino masses up to 1.2 TeV depending on branching ratios at 95 percent confidence level.

What carries the argument

Event selection requiring an isolated high-pT photon, multiple jets and large missing transverse momentum, followed by comparison to Standard Model predictions and interpretation within gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking models.

Load-bearing premise

The exclusion limits rely on the specific branching ratios and production cross sections assumed in the gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking models under consideration.

What would settle it

Observation of a statistically significant excess of events with the predicted characteristics at gaugino masses below the excluded range would contradict the no-excess result and the derived limits.

read the original abstract

A search for final states characterised by at least one isolated high transverse-momentum photon, jets and large missing transverse momentum is presented. Such a final state might occur in gauge-mediated supersymmetric models where a pair of binos and higgsinos mix to form neutralinos, one of which decays into a photon plus a gravitino while the other decays into a Higgs boson, a Z boson or a photon, plus a gravitino. The search is performed using the full Run-2 data sample of 140 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model prediction and model-dependent exclusion limits at the 95% confidence level are set. These limits are interpreted in terms of the masses of gauginos, which are excluded up to 1.2 TeV depending on their branching ratios, and on their branching ratios as a function of their mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for electroweakino production in gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking models at the ATLAS detector. Using the full Run-2 dataset of 140 fb^{-1} at 13 TeV, the analysis targets final states with at least one isolated high-pT photon, jets, and large missing transverse momentum, corresponding to neutralino decays to photon + gravitino or Higgs/Z + gravitino. No significant excess above Standard Model backgrounds is observed, and 95% CL model-dependent exclusion limits are set on gaugino masses up to 1.2 TeV, with additional limits on branching ratios as a function of mass.

Significance. If the result holds, the analysis provides competitive constraints on supersymmetric parameter space in GMSB scenarios with specific neutralino decay modes. It employs standard ATLAS procedures for background estimation, object identification, and statistical limit setting on a large dataset, with explicit acknowledgment of model dependence. This strengthens previous exclusions and contributes to the broader program of electroweakino searches at the LHC.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'depending on their branching ratios' is used without quantifying the range of branching fractions considered in the interpretation; a brief parenthetical note would improve clarity for readers.
  2. [Event selection] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit table in the event selection section summarizing the photon, jet, and MET requirements along with the signal region definitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope of our search for electroweakino production in gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking models using the full Run-2 ATLAS dataset, and we appreciate the acknowledgment of the competitive constraints obtained.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: No major comments provided in the report.

    Authors: We are pleased that the referee finds the analysis to employ standard ATLAS procedures and to provide competitive limits on GMSB scenarios with the specified neutralino decay modes. Since no specific major comments were raised, no substantive changes to the scientific content are required. We will address any minor editorial or formatting points in the revised version. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard experimental limit-setting on external simulations

full rationale

The paper reports a direct search for new physics signatures in 140 fb^{-1} of ATLAS data. It compares observed events in a photon + jets + MET final state against Standard Model background predictions from Monte Carlo simulations and sets 95% CL exclusion limits on gaugino masses in specific GMSB models. No derivation step reduces to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and the null result plus model-dependent limits are obtained via standard statistical procedures against independent external inputs. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on Standard Model background predictions, Monte Carlo modeling of detector response, and the specific supersymmetric decay assumptions used to interpret the null result. No new free parameters are introduced beyond those varied in the limit-setting procedure.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model processes accurately predict the background rates and shapes in the signal region after selection cuts.
    Invoked when subtracting backgrounds to claim no excess.
  • domain assumption The gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking model correctly describes the production and decay branching ratios of the electroweakinos.
    Used to translate the null result into mass exclusion limits.
invented entities (1)
  • Gravitino no independent evidence
    purpose: Lightest supersymmetric particle that escapes detection and produces missing transverse momentum.
    Postulated within gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking; no independent evidence provided in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1470 out tokens · 61847 ms · 2026-05-17T05:06:25.252444+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Y. A. Gol’fand and E. P. Likhtman, Extension of the Algebra of Poincare Group Generators and Violation of p Invariance, JETP Lett.13(1971) 323, [Pisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 13:452-455,1971]

    work page 1971

  2. [2]

    D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov,Is the Neutrino a Goldstone Particle?, Phys. Lett. B46(1973) 109

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge transformations in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B70(1974) 39

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge Invariant Extension of Quantum Electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B78(1974) 1

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    Ferrara and B

    S. Ferrara and B. Zumino,Supergauge Invariant Yang-Mills Theories, Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 413

    work page 1974

  6. [6]

    Salam and J

    A. Salam and J. Strathdee,Super-symmetry and non-Abelian gauges, Phys. Lett. B51(1974) 353

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    S. P. Martin,A Supersymmetry primer, (1997), [Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18,1(1998)], arXiv:hep-ph/9709356 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Barbieri and G

    R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice,Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 63

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    One-Loop Analysis of the Electroweak Breaking in Supersymmetric Models and the Fine-Tuning Problems

    B. de Carlos and J. A. Casas,One-loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine-tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 320, arXiv:hep-ph/9303291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  10. [10]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, A Phenomenological Model of Particle Physics Based on Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 227

    work page 1982

  11. [11]

    Alvarez-Gaumé, M

    L. Alvarez-Gaumé, M. Claudson and M. B. Wise,Low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B207(1982) 96. 21

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    C. R. Nappi and B. A. Ovrut,Supersymmetric Extension of the SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) Model, Phys. Lett. B113(1982) 175

    work page 1982

  13. [13]

    (Extra)Ordinary Gauge Mediation

    C. Cheung, A. L. Fitzpatrick and D. Shih,(Extra)ordinary gauge mediation, JHEP07(2008) 054, arXiv:0710.3585 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    General Gauge Mediation

    P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih,General Gauge Mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.177(2009) 143, arXiv:0801.3278 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    Goldberg,Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys

    H. Goldberg,Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1419

    work page 1983

  16. [16]

    Ellis, J

    J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. Olive and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys. B238(1984) 453

    work page 1984

  17. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for diphoton events with large missing transverse momentum in 1fb −1 of7TeV proton–proton collision data with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 519, arXiv:1111.4116 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for supersymmetry in events with photons, bottom quarks, and missing transverse momentum in proton–proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B719(2013) 261, arXiv:1211.1167 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Diphoton Events with Large Missing Transverse Energy in 7 TeV Proton–Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 121803, arXiv:1012.4272 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for diphoton events with large missing transverse energy with 36pb −1 of7TeV proton–proton collision data with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1744, arXiv:1107.0561 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for Supersymmetry in𝑝 𝑝Collisions at√𝑠=7TeV in Events with Two Photons and Missing Transverse Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 211802, arXiv:1103.0953 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for supersymmetry in events with a lepton, a photon, and large missing transverse energy in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=7TeV, JHEP06(2011) 093, arXiv:1105.3152 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for stealth supersymmetry in events with jets, either photons or leptons, and low missing transverse momentum in𝑝 𝑝collisions at8TeV, Phys. Lett. B743(2015) 503, arXiv:1411.7255 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in8TeV 𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 072001, arXiv:1507.05493 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for supersymmetry with photons in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 072006, arXiv:1507.02898 [hep-ex]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Summary of the ATLAS experiment’s sensitivity to supersymmetry after LHC Run 1 — interpreted in the phenomenological MSSM, JHEP10(2015) 134, arXiv:1508.06608 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in13TeV 𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 092006, arXiv:1802.03158 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for new phenomena in final states with photons, jets and missing transverse momentum in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2023) 021, arXiv:2206.06012 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Evans and P

    L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3(2008) S08001

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with missing transverse momentum and aHiggs boson decayinginto photons in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV withthe ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2020) 005, arXiv:2004.10894 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair-produced higgsinos decaying via Higgs or𝑍bosons to final states containing a pair of photons and a pair of𝑏-jets with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138938, arXiv:2404.01996 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for new physics in multijet events with at least one photon and large missing transverse momentum in proton–proton collisions at13TeV, JHEP10(2023) 046, arXiv:2307.16216 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    J. Liu, N. McGinnis, C. E. M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang, Searching for the Higgsino-Bino Sector at the LHC, JHEP09(2020) 073, arXiv:2006.07389 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    work page arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Production and Integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    The Production of Charginos/Neutralinos and Sleptons at Hadron Colliders

    W. Beenakker et al.,The Production of charginos/neutralinos and sleptons at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3780, arXiv:hep-ph/9906298 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    Threshold resummation for gaugino pair production at hadron colliders

    J. Debove, B. Fuks and M. Klasen, Threshold resummation for gaugino pair production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B842(2011) 51, arXiv:1005.2909 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of8TeV, JHEP10(2012) 081, arXiv:1207.2159 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Precisionpredictionsforelectroweaksuperpartnerproductionathadroncolliderswithresummino, Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2480, arXiv:1304.0790 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Neutralino/chargino pair production at NLO+NLL with resummation-improved PDFs for LHC Run II

    J. Fiaschi and M. Klasen,Neutralino-chargino pair production at NLO+NLL with resummation-improved parton density functions for LHC Run II, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 055014, arXiv:1805.11322 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV

    C. Borschensky et al., Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at√𝑠= 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3174, arXiv:1407.5066 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

    work page arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: first genuine NNLO QCD corrections to q qbar -> t tbar + X

    P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon and A. Mitov,Percent-Level-Precision Physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to𝑞¯𝑞→𝑡¯𝑡+𝑋, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 132001, arXiv:1204.5201 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason,A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  56. [56]

    H. B. Hartanto, B. Jäger, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth, Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 094003, arXiv:1501.04498 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Comix, a new matrix element generator

    T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12(2008) 039, arXiv:0808.3674 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  59. [59]

    Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur

    F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212(2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A Parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03(2008) 038, arXiv:0709.1027 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [63]

    A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  64. [64]

    QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv:1207.5030 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD matrix elements + parton showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    work page 2003

  69. [69]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    work page arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

    work page 2001

  72. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    work page arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv:1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv:2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [78]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 581, arXiv:1510.03823 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS 𝑏-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with𝑡¯𝑡 events in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 970, arXiv:1907.05120 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.