Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Floquet thermalization by power-law induced permutation symmetry breaking

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A periodically kicked power-law spin chain thermalizes to full Hilbert-space random-matrix values only at intermediate interaction ranges.

desk verdict A clean finite-size numerical study showing that a power-law deformation of the kicked top opens an intermediate-α thermalizing window to the full Hilbert space; credible but needs error bars and finite-size scaling before the window's boundaries are taken as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.21284 v2 pith:64AD5TIZ submitted 2025-11-26 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CD

Manju C , Uma Divakaran This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CD
keywords Floquetthermalizationpower-lawinteractionspermutationsymmetrybreakingkickedtopIsingmodelrandommatrixtheorylevelspacingstatisticsentanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to a collectively driven spin system when the ideal all-to-all permutation symmetry is broken by realistic power-law couplings that decay as 1/r^α. It claims that as α is tuned from zero to large values, the system passes through three regimes: near the permutation-symmetric chaotic kicked top, a full-Hilbert-space thermalizing window, and an integrable kicked-Ising limit. In the thermalizing window, time-averaged observables and Floquet eigenstate statistics match random-matrix predictions for the full Hilbert space, and increasing the driving period widens this window. The study uses total angular momentum and half-chain entanglement entropy as symmetry-breaking probes, corroborated by effective dimension and level-spacing statistics. A sympathetic reader would care because it identifies a simple tunable parameter that controls whether a Floquet system explores only a small symmetric subspace or ergodically fills its entire Hilbert space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the power-law interaction term with Kac normalization, 1/|i−j|^α, which acts as a continuously tunable symmetry-breaking knob: α=0 gives the permutation-symmetric kicked top, α→∞ gives the integrable kicked Ising chain. The conserved total angular momentum J² at α=0 becomes the primary diagnostic, because its steady-state value reveals which Hilbert-space sector the dynamics explores, while the von Neumann entropy of a half-chain bipartition independently confirms the crossover. Floquet eigenstate analysis via effective dimension and level-spacing ratio provides the spectral signature of the transition from Wigner-Dyson to Poisson statistics.

What would settle it

Perform finite-size scaling of the time-averaged half-chain entropy and ⟨J²⟩ at N=14, 16, and 18 for α around 0.5–5 and τ=1, extending the averaging window to 10^6 steps; if the intermediate-α plateau shifts significantly with N or the large-α entropy continues to climb instead of saturating, the claimed thermalization window is a finite-time or finite-size artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a periodically kicked spin chain with interactions decaying as 1/|i−j|^α, there is an intermediate range of α where the dynamics thermalizes to the full Hilbert space, not just the permutation-symmetric subspace. For small α, the steady-state values of ⟨J²⟩ and von Neumann entropy remain close to the α=0 permutation-symmetric subspace values; for intermediate α (roughly 0.5 to 2 at τ=1, wider for larger τ), ⟨J²⟩ approaches 3N/4, the half-chain entropy approaches the Page value, the effective dimension approaches 2^{N−1}+2^{N/2−1} (the even bit-reversal sector), and the mean level-spacing ratio approaches the COE value 0.529. For large α, these quantities approach

Load-bearing premise

The results assume that time-averaging from 10^5 to 3×10^5 Floquet steps at system sizes N=12–16 yields converged steady states whose qualitative behavior persists in the thermodynamic limit—yet the paper itself excludes α>4 from the entropy plot because those values have not reached steady state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The driven power-law spin chain exhibits three distinct dynamical phases: symmetric-subspace chaos at small α, full-Hilbert-space thermalization at intermediate α, and integrable kicked-Ising behavior at large α.
  • In the intermediate regime, all studied diagnostics—⟨J²⟩, half-chain entropy, effective dimension, and mean level-spacing ratio—simultaneously match random-matrix predictions for the full Hilbert space, indicating ergodic Floquet eigenstates.
  • Increasing the driving period τ shifts the onset of thermalization to smaller α and widens the thermalizing window, because slower driving allows the system to absorb energy from the drive more easily.
  • The large-α limit can be solved semi-analytically using Jordan-Wigner fermions, giving closed-form correlation functions and entanglement entropy that agree with direct numerics.
  • The quantity ⟨J²⟩, conserved at α=0, is a sensitive order parameter for how far the dynamics has departed from the permutation-symmetric subspace.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the intermediate-α thermalization window persists at larger system sizes, α and τ together could serve as a practical control knob in Floquet quantum simulators, tuning between symmetry-restricted collective dynamics and full ergodic exploration.
  • Because the effective dimension saturates at the even bit-reversal sector rather than 2^N, a natural extension is to break this residual reflection symmetry (e.g., with a local field) and check whether ⟨J²⟩ rises above 3N/4 toward the unrestricted random-state value.
  • The role of the Kac normalization factor is not isolated here; comparing with an un-normalized power-law coupling could reveal whether the thermalizing window is driven primarily by symmetry breaking or by the renormalization of interaction strength.
  • The paper's own observation that α>4 does not reach steady state on the simulated timescales suggests that the large-α branch of the phase diagram is still a finite-time snapshot; longer-time or larger-size studies could shift the integrable boundary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a Floquet spin chain with power-law couplings decaying as 1/r^α, interpolating between the permutation-symmetric kicked top (α=0) and the integrable kicked Ising model (α→∞). Starting from a spin-coherent state, it computes time-averaged total angular momentum ⟨J²⟩, half-chain von Neumann entropy S_{N/2}, effective dimension D_eff, and Floquet level-spacing ratio as functions of α and drive period τ. For small α the long-time values remain near the permutation-symmetric-subspace RMT values; for intermediate α they approach full-Hilbert-space RMT values (⟨J²⟩≈3N/4, Page entropy, D_eff≈2^{N−1}+2^{N/2−1}, COE ⟨r⟩≈0.529); for large α they approach integrable kicked-Ising behavior. A Jordan-Wigner analysis supports the large-α limit, and an appendix derives the 3N/4 value in the bit-reversal sector. The paper concludes that an intermediate-α thermalizing window exists and that its location and width are controlled by the driving period τ.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper identifies a clean and tunable interpolation regime: power-law breaking of permutation symmetry produces a finite-α window of full-Hilbert-space thermalization, and the window can be widened by increasing the drive period. The evidence has genuine strengths: the RMT benchmarks are external and standard rather than fitted; Appendix A gives an independent derivation of ⟨J²⟩≈3N/4 in the bit-reversal sector; the large-α Jordan-Wigner analysis provides a nonperturbative check in the integrable limit; and the four diagnostics (J², entropy, D_eff, level statistics) are internally consistent for the system sizes studied. The principal weaknesses are that the central phase diagram is inferred from single-N, partly unconverged time averages, and the spectral-statistics baseline at α=0 is not specified at the level of symmetry resolution needed to justify the Wigner-Dyson-to-Poisson transition.

major comments (2)
  1. [Secs. III A–B and Figs. 1–2, 5–6] The central claim of an intermediate-α thermalizing window and its τ-dependence rests on time-averaged quantities computed at a single system size with no error bars: ⟨J²⟩ at N=16 (Fig. 1), S_{N/2} at N=14 (Fig. 2), and D_eff and ⟨r⟩ at N=12 (Figs. 5–6). The paper itself states in Sec. III B that for α>4 the entropy has not reached steady state within the simulated time window, yet the τ=5 branch (insets of Figs. 1 and 2 and Fig. 6) extends the thermalizing window to α≈5. A single-N, partly unconverged time average cannot distinguish a true thermalizing phase from a finite-size or prethermal plateau. Please provide finite-size scaling for at least the key observables at several N, quantitative convergence criteria for the time averages, and error bars or fluctuation measures for the steady-state values. This is necessary to support the claimed boundaries of the window and the τ-shift.
  2. [Sec. IV B, Fig. 6] The α=0 baseline for the level-spacing ratio is not defined consistently with the symmetry resolution used for α>0. At α=0 the Hamiltonian has full permutation symmetry, not merely parity and bit reversal; the even-parity/bit-reversal block still contains many independent total-spin sectors. If the spectrum is taken from that block without resolving the permutation sectors, exact degeneracies will produce Poisson-like spacings, not COE. If instead only the maximum-J sector is used, its dimension is only N+1=13 for N=12, too small for a reliable ⟨r⟩. The manuscript should state exactly which symmetry sectors enter Fig. 6 at each α, and give the number of levels and an uncertainty estimate. Without this, the claimed Wigner-Dyson-to-Poisson transition as α is tuned is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III C, Fig. 4] The semi-analytic Jordan-Wigner calculation is for the kicked Ising model with periodic boundary conditions, whereas the main numerics use the open-boundary power-law Hamiltonian. This is a fine approximation for α→∞, but it does not describe the crossover region α≈3–5. The empirical fit S=0.06+0.03N_A is introduced without stating the α value, the fitted range, or residuals; please clarify.
  2. [Sec. IV A] The parameter ε in D_eff is arbitrary. Please include a brief sensitivity check or reference showing that the reported plateau is robust to the choice of ε.
  3. [Sec. III B] The definition of 'steady state' is based on visual inspection. Please add a quantitative stationarity criterion (e.g., slope over the averaging window) and report the time-average window for each α.
  4. [Sec. II and Fig. 1 inset] For τ=0.1 the effective Floquet parameters are kτ=0.6 and pτ≈0.114, so the α=0 kicked top is in the regular regime. The text should state this and clarify whether the τ=0.1 branch is expected to thermalize, since the conclusion says thermalization requires the α=0 model to be chaotic.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. IV A] The abstract says 'full Hilbert space RMT values', but due to bit-reversal symmetry the dynamics only explores a sector of dimension ~2^{N−1}. Appendix A handles this for J², and the entropy comparison is asymptotically consistent, but an early caveat would improve precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central claim rests on external RMT benchmarks and an independent symmetry-sector average.

full rationale

The paper's main quantitative targets—⟨J²⟩=3N/4, Page entropy N/2−1/(2 ln 2), ⟨r⟩COE=0.529, and even-parity dimension 2^{N−1}+2^{N/2−1}—are external/standard results, not derived from the data. The comparison between numerically time-averaged values and these benchmarks is a direct, falsifiable test rather than a fit. The Appendix A computation of ⟨J²⟩=3N/4 in the bit-reversal-constrained full space is an independent derivation from random-state Haar averaging, not an input of the numerics. The large-α analytic section uses the standard Jordan-Wigner solution of the kicked Ising chain [25,62] and validates it against the same Hamiltonian's numerics. The paper does cite the authors' own earlier work [46] for the disorder analogue and for the ⟨J²⟩_RMT=3N/4 benchmark, and [66] for the D_eff scaling of random states; however, the present claims also independently derive the relevant value in Appendix A and compare against standard Page/COE values, so these self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing. The main epistemic weaknesses—single system sizes, absence of error bars and finite-size scaling, and the paper's own exclusion of α>4 due to unconverged entropy—are correctness/robustness concerns about whether the observed plateau is a prethermal or finite-size artifact, not circularity. No parameter was fitted to force the RMT benchmarks, and no definition smuggles in the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced; the bit-reversal symmetry sector and Kac normalization are existing/modeling structures. The only fitted quantities are an illustrative large-N extrapolation and the arbitrary ε threshold in D_eff.

free parameters (2)
  • Large-N entropy extrapolation coefficients (S = 0.06 + 0.03 N_A) = 0.06, 0.03
    Fit to semi-analytic entropy values for kicked Ising at large α (Fig 4) to estimate S_{N/2} at N=800; illustrative, not part of the finite-N thermalization claim.
  • Effective-dimension threshold ε = 0.0001
    Chosen small cutoff in D_eff definition (Sec IV A); changes D_eff magnitude but not the qualitative peak in the intermediate-α regime.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner transformation and Wick's theorem for a transverse-field Ising chain
    Used in Sec III C to compute J² and S_{N/2} in the large-α limit; standard free-fermion technique from refs [25,62].
  • standard math Random-matrix benchmarks (COE level spacing, Page entropy, ⟨J²⟩=3N/4 for random states in full Hilbert space)
    Used throughout as thermalization references; standard results [60,68-70] and derived in Appendix A for the bit-reversal sector.
  • domain assumption α=0 kicked top with k=6 is in the chaotic regime and dynamics is confined to the permutation-symmetric subspace
    Sec II/III; central starting point, refs [47,48,50].
  • domain assumption For α→∞, boundary conditions do not matter in the thermodynamic limit, so open-chain numerics can be compared to periodic-boundary JW solution
    Sec III C; used to interpret the large-α integrable limit.
  • domain assumption Initial spin-coherent state is even under bit-reversal, so only the even sector is populated
    Sec IV A and Appendix A; dimension of even sector 2^{N−1}+2^{N/2−1} [57,67].
  • ad hoc to paper Time average from n=10^5 to 3×10^5 yields steady-state values for α≲4
    Numerical convergence assumption; explicitly violated for α=5 (Sec III B), so the large-α branch of the interpolation is not directly computed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet thermalization by power-law induced permutation symmetry breaking." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64AD5TIZ

@misc{pith2026251121284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet thermalization by power-law induced permutation symmetry breaking},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64AD5TIZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.21284}
}
abstract

Permutation symmetry plays a central role in the understanding of collective quantum dynamics. By introducing power law couplings that algebraically decay with the distance between the spins $r$ as $1/r^{\alpha}$, we break this symmetry with a non-zero $\alpha$. This allows us to probe the emergence of new dynamical behaviors, including thermalization in an otherwise permutation symmetric Hamiltonian with all-to-all spin interactions along $x$ direction subjected to periodic kicks in transverse direction. As we increase $\alpha$, the system interpolates from an infinite range spin system at $\alpha=0$ exhibiting permutation symmetry, to a short range integrable model as $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$ where this permutation symmetry is absent. We focus on this change in the behavior of the system as $\alpha$ is tuned, using dynamical quantities like total angular momentum and von Neumann entropy. Starting from the chaotic limit of the permutation symmetric Hamiltonian at $\alpha=0$, for the finite system sizes considered, we find that for small $\alpha$, the steady state values of these quantities remain close to the permutation symmetric subspace values corresponding to $\alpha=0$. At intermediate $\alpha$ values, these show signatures of thermalization exhibiting values corresponding to that of random states in full Hilbert space. On the other hand, the large $\alpha$ limit approaches the values corresponding to integrable kicked Ising model. In addition, we also study the dependence of thermalization on the driving period $\tau$, with results indicating the onset of thermalization for smaller values of $\alpha$ when $\tau$ is large, thereby extending the thermalizing window in the intermediate range of $\alpha$. We further confirm these results using effective dimension and spectral statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.21284 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) for different α, where the period of driving τ is set to unity. As stated earlier, α = 0 is the kicked top model where ⟨J 2 ⟩ is a constant of motion and its value is given by ⟨J 2 ⟩ = N/2(N/2 + 1). For any non-zero α, J 2 is no longer a constant of motion and its value decreases from that at α = 0, and reaches a steady state at large n. The time averaged steady state value denoted by ⟨J 2⟩ is plotted as a funct… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a), further confirming thermalization in the inter￾mediate α regime. The variation of SN/2 with α for dif￾ferent τ is shown in the inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. For large α, previous studies have shown that the saturation values of entropy scales linearly with sub￾system size [65], consistent with our results presented in the inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a). The plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: It is well established that for α = 0, the kicked top model at large values of k exhibits chaotic behavior and the nearest neighbor statistics follows the Wigner Dyson distribution corresponding to the COE ensemble [70]. We see that this trend continues as we increase …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The average level spacing ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hauke and L

    P. Hauke and L. Tagliacozzo, Spread of correlations in long-range interacting quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 207202 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    M. v. d. Worm, B. C. Sawyer, J. J. Bollinger, and M. Kastner, Relaxation timescales and decay of corre- lations in a long-range interacting quantum simulator, New Journal of Physics15, 083007 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Mukamel, S

    D. Mukamel, S. Ruffo, and N. Schreiber, Breaking of er- godicity and long relaxation times in systems with long- range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 240604 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Kiefer, F

    P. Kiefer, F. Hakelberg, M. Wittemer, A. Berm´ udez, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Floquet- engineered vibrational dynamics in a two-dimensional ar- ray of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 213605 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    The deviation ofJ 2 from⟨J 2⟩RM T for largeαis justified owing to its transition to a more localized short range interacting integrable spin chain at largeαvalues

    This behavior is expected as decreasing the driving frequency (or increasingτ) can make the system absorb energy from the drive, resulting in faster thermalization [10]. The deviation ofJ 2 from⟨J 2⟩RM T for largeαis justified owing to its transition to a more localized short range interacting integrable spin chain at largeαvalues. We shall explain thisτa...

    2025

  6. [6]

    Zhang, C.-R

    J.-Y. Zhang, C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, R.-H. Jiao, K.-Y. Shi, H. Yuan, W. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Tuning anomalous floquet topological bands with ultra- cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043201 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G

    B. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G. Platero, and ´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, Quantum origin of anomalous floquet phases in cavity- qed materials, Communications Physics7, 419 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)

    2014

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Ponte, A

    P. Ponte, A. Chandran, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Pe- riodically driven ergodic and many-body localized quan- tum systems, Annals of Physics353, 196 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Machado, G

    F. Machado, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, D. V. Else, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Exponentially slow heating in short and long-range interacting floquet systems, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033202 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    C. Yin, P. Peng, X. Huang, C. Ramanathan, and P. Cap- pellaro, Prethermal quasiconserved observables in floquet quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B103, 054305 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Fleckenstein and M

    C. Fleckenstein and M. Bukov, Prethermalization and thermalization in periodically driven many-body systems away from the high-frequency limit, Phys. Rev. B103, L140302 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    P. Peng, C. Yin, X. Huang, C. Ramanathan, and P. Cap- pellaro, Floquet prethermalization in dipolar spin chains, Nature Physics17, 444 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Rubio-Abadal, M

    A. Rubio-Abadal, M. Ippoliti, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, J. Rui, S. L. Sondhi, V. Khemani, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Floquet prethermalization in a bose-hubbard system, Phys. Rev. X10, 021044 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Ponte, Z

    P. Ponte, Z. Papi´ c, F. m. c. Huveneers, and D. A. Abanin, Many-body localization in periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 140401 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    D’Alessio and A

    L. D’Alessio and A. Polkovnikov, Many-body energy lo- calization transition in periodically driven systems, An- nals of Physics333, 19 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Regnault and R

    N. Regnault and R. Nandkishore, Floquet thermaliza- 10 tion: Symmetries and random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. B93, 104203 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    S. Bhattacharjee, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Polkovnikov, Sharp detection of the onset of floquet heating using eigenstate sensitivity, The European Physical Journal B97, 151 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Seshadri, V

    A. Seshadri, V. Madhok, and A. Lakshminarayan, Tri- partite mutual information, entanglement, and scram- bling in permutation symmetric systems with an appli- cation to quantum chaos, Physical Review E98, 052205 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    M. H. Mu˜ noz Arias, K. Chinni, and P. M. Poggi, Floquet time crystals in driven spin systems with all-to-allp-body interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023018 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Olsacher, L

    T. Olsacher, L. Pastori, C. Kokail, L. M. Sieberer, and P. Zoller, Digital quantum simulation, learning of the flo- quet hamiltonian, and quantum chaos of the kicked top, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 334003 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Akila, D

    M. Akila, D. Waltner, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, Particle- time duality in the kicked ising spin chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 375101 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Lakshminarayan and V

    A. Lakshminarayan and V. Subrahmanyam, Multipartite entanglement in a one-dimensional time-dependent ising model, Phys. Rev. A71, 062334 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    S. K. Mishra, A. Lakshminarayan, and V. Subrah- manyam, Protocol using kicked ising dynamics for gen- erating states with maximal multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A91, 022318 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Das and A

    P. Das and A. Dutta, Insights from the analytical solution of a periodically driven transverse-field ising chain, Phys. Rev. B111, 045159 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Leuzzi, G

    L. Leuzzi, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and J. J. Ruiz- Lorenzo, Dilute one-dimensional spin glasses with power law decaying interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 107203 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Islam, C

    R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interactions in a quantum simulator, Science340, 583 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules, Nature501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    H. B. Kaplan, L. Guo, W. L. Tan, A. De, F. Marquardt, G. Pagano, and C. Monroe, Many-body dephasing in a trapped-ion quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 120605 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature484, 489 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body sys- tem, Nature511, 202 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Pappalardi, A

    S. Pappalardi, A. Russomanno, B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, F. Iemini, A. Silva, and R. Fazio, Scrambling and entanglement spreading in long-range spin chains, Phys. Rev. B98, 134303 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Schachenmayer, B

    J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth in quench dynamics with variable range interactions, Phys. Rev. X3, 031015 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Chen and A

    C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas, Optimal frobenius light cone in spin chains with power-law interactions, Phys. Rev. A 104, 062420 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    ˇZunkoviˇ c, M

    B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, M. Heyl, M. Knap, and A. Silva, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in spin chains with long-range interactions: Merging different concepts of nonequilib- rium criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 130601 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Neyenhuis, J

    B. Neyenhuis, J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, J. Smith, A. C. Lee, P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Mon- roe, Observation of prethermalization in long-range inter- acting spin chains, Science Advances3, e1700672 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1700672

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    F. Liu, R. Lundgren, P. Titum, G. Pagano, J. Zhang, C. Monroe, and A. V. Gorshkov, Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long-range interacting quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 150601 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Russomanno, M

    A. Russomanno, M. Fava, and M. Heyl, Quantum chaos and ensemble inequivalence of quantum long-range ising chains, Phys. Rev. B104, 094309 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Lerose, T

    A. Lerose, T. Parolini, R. Fazio, D. A. Abanin, and S. Pappalardi, Theory of robust quantum many-body scars in long-range interacting systems, Phys. Rev. X15, 011020 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    L. G. C. Lakkaraju, S. Ghosh, D. Sadhukhan, and A. Sen(De), Mimicking quantum correlation of a long- range hamiltonian by finite-range interactions, Phys. Rev. A106, 052425 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Machado, D

    F. Machado, D. V. Else, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Long-range prethermal phases of nonequilibrium matter, Phys. Rev. X10, 011043 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Lerose, J

    A. Lerose, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prether- mal quantum many-body kapitza phases of periodically driven spin systems, Phys. Rev. B100, 104306 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    D. S. Bhakuni, L. F. Santos, and Y. B. Lev, Suppres- sion of heating by long-range interactions in periodically driven spin chains, Phys. Rev. B104, L140301 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    M. C, A. Lakshminarayan, and U. Divakaran, Chaos con- trolled and disorder driven phase transitions induced by breaking permutation symmetry, Scientific Reports15, 1 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Haake, M

    F. Haake, M. Ku´ s, and R. Scharf, Classical and quantum chaos for a kicked top, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter65, 381 (1987)

    1987

  41. [49]

    Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos(volume 54

    F. Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos(volume 54. Springer Science and Business, 2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    X. Wang, S. Ghose, B. C. Sanders, and B. Hu, Entangle- ment as a signature of quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E70, 016217 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Ghose, R

    S. Ghose, R. Stock, P. Jessen, R. Lal, and A. Silberfarb, Chaos, entanglement, and decoherence in the quantum kicked top, Phys. Rev. A78, 042318 (2008)

    2008

  44. [52]

    U. T. Bhosale and M. S. Santhanam, Periodicity of quan- 11 tum correlations in the quantum kicked top, Phys. Rev. E98, 052228 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    X. Wang, J. Ma, L. Song, X. Zhang, and X. Wang, Spin squeezing, negative correlations, and concurrence in the quantum kicked top model, Phys. Rev. E82, 056205 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Kumari and S

    M. Kumari and S. Ghose, Quantum-classical correspon- dence in the vicinity of periodic orbits, Phys. Rev. E97, 052209 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    T. Prosen, Exact time-correlation functions of quantum ising chain in a kicking transversal magnetic field: Spec- tral analysis of the adjoint propagator in heisenberg pic- ture, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement139, 191 (2000), https://academic.oup.com/ptps/article- ...

    2000 doi

  48. [56]

    Prosen, General relation between quantum ergodic- ity and fidelity of quantum dynamics, Phys

    T. Prosen, General relation between quantum ergodic- ity and fidelity of quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. E65, 036208 (2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 264101 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    R. K. Shukla, A. Lakshminarayan, and S. K. Mishra, Out-of-time-order correlators of nonlocal block-spin and random observables in integrable and nonintegrable spin chains, Phys. Rev. B105, 224307 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Lee Loh and M

    Y. Lee Loh and M. Kim, Visualizing spin states using the spin coherent state representation, American Journal of Physics83, 30 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    R. J. Glauber and F. Haake, Superradiant pulses and directed angular momentum states, Phys. Rev. A13, 357 (1976)

    1976

  53. [61]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Physical Review Letters71, 1291 (1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    Jonay, J

    C. Jonay, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and V. Khemani, Slow thermalization and subdiffusion inu(1) conserving flo- quet random circuits, Phys. Rev. B109, 024311 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Nandy, A

    S. Nandy, A. Sen, and D. Sen, Aperiodically driven in- tegrable systems and their emergent steady states, Phys. Rev. X7, 031034 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, and G. E. Santoro, The quantum ising chain for beginners, SciPost Physics Lec- ture Notes , 082 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Barouch and B

    E. Barouch and B. M. McCoy, Statistical mechanics of thexymodel. ii. spin-correlation functions, Phys. Rev. A3, 786 (1971)

    1971

  58. [66]

    Russomanno, G

    A. Russomanno, G. E. Santoro, and R. Fazio, Entangle- ment entropy in a periodically driven ising chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 073101 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    M. C, U. Divakaran, and A. Lakshminarayan, Disorder- ing a permutation symmetric system: Revivals, thermal- ization, and chaos, Phys. Rev. E112, 044219 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    H.-L. Shi, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz` e, Quantum chaos, ran- domness and universal scaling of entanglement in various Krylov spaces, SciPost Phys.19, 102 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B75, 155111 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 084101 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    Wang and M

    Q. Wang and M. Robnik, Statistics of phase space local- ization measures and quantum chaos in the kicked top model, Phys. Rev. E107, 054213 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    S. Puri, T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. S. De, Floquet driven long-range interactions induce super- extensive scaling in quantum batteries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00921 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.