Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 55 references

A stellar halo's sky positions and stellar metallicities carry joint information that rises outward and survives only in the inner halo.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 19:30 UTC pith:OOJIFBFO

load-bearing objection A genuinely new diagnostic (mutual information between sky position and metallicity) applied to Aquarius mock halos; the qualitative trends are plausible, but the Milky Way generalizations outrun the DM-only, accreted-only simulations. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.23452 v2 pith:OOJIFBFO submitted 2025-11-28 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

From metallicity distributions to mutual information: A new perspective on stellar halo assembly

Amit Mondal , Biswajit Pandey This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords stellar halosmutual informationmetallicity distribution functionspatial anisotropygalaxy assemblyhierarchical accretionphase mixinggalactic archaeology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using five simulated Milky Way-mass stellar halos, the paper argues that the mutual information between a star's angular position on the sky and its metallicity class is a sensitive, model-independent probe of how the halo was assembled. In every halo this mutual information grows with galactocentric radius and systematically exceeds the level expected from randomized metallicity labels, signalling that accreted substructures remain spatially and chemically coherent. Removing bound satellites collapses much of the signal, but a residual excess survives in the inner ~30-50 kpc, which the authors attribute to only partially mixed debris from massive early accretion events. The paper also shows that low-metallicity stars are more anisotropic than metal-rich stars when satellites are included, while the ordering inverts after satellite removal. A sympathetic reader would care because the measure is parameter-free and directly applicable to high-dimensional survey data.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the mutual information between sky position and metallicity, I_r(X;Z), evaluated cumulatively within radius r, rises systematically with r and diverges from randomized controls in all five halos, whereas the controls decline. The excess over random, ΔI_r, grows outward and plateaus, marking the radius beyond which newly included stars add no further spatial-chemical structure. After bound satellites are removed, the MI amplitude drops sharply and the residual ΔI_r is confined to the inner few tens of kiloparsecs, indicating that the smooth halo's lasting memory of accretion is the central debris of massive progenitors. The same data show a before/after inversion

What carries the argument

The central object is the mutual information I_r(X;Z) between a star's sky-pixel index (angular position) and a binary metallicity label (low/high relative to the halo median), computed from mass-weighted counts within a cumulative radius r and compared against metallicity-label-shuffled randomized controls. It is a parameter-free measure that captures both global anisotropy and localized chemical substructure in one number; its radial profile and excess over random provide the diagnostic. Supporting machinery includes a Shannon-entropy whole-sky anisotropy parameter a(r), used to compare high- and low-metallicity subsamples before and after satellite removal.

Load-bearing premise

The entire read of the signal depends on the mock stellar halos—built by attaching metallicities to the most-bound dark-matter particles rather than by simulating gas and star formation—faithfully matching real stellar halos' spatial and chemical structure.

What would settle it

Compute the same cumulative mutual information in a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation that includes in-situ star formation. If the inner-halo ΔI_r excess at 30-50 kpc disappears or moves, or if the radial rise of MI is not reproduced, then the tagging prescription, not incomplete phase mixing, is generating the signal. Observationally, applying the identical pixel-and-shuffle MI estimator to thousands of Milky Way halo stars with reliable metallicities and distances would show whether the predicted rise and inner-halo confinement exist; a null result would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If MI rises with radius, outer-halo surveys should expect spatial-chemical correlations stronger than a naive smooth halo would predict, so substructure searches can treat metallicity as a companion dimension alongside position.
  • The inner ~30-50 kpc residual after satellite removal gives a concrete radial target where the Milky Way's most massive early merger debris should remain chemically coherent even after most substructure has phase-mixed.
  • The plateau radius of ΔI_r offers a quantitative mixing boundary that can be compared across simulations or galaxies to rank assembly histories.
  • Because the measure uses only sky position and metallicity, the same computation can be applied directly to survey catalogs, with selection-function effects entering through the pixel weighting.
  • The before/after satellite comparison demonstrates that bound satellites, not only the smooth halo, are the principal carriers of angular-metallicity coupling, so satellite identification is crucial for interpreting MI signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The plateau radius of the MI excess might serve as an empirical phase-mixing clock: halos with a more recent major merger should show a larger inner-halo MI excess and a sharper radial gradient; this is testable by applying the same pipeline to hydrodynamical simulations with varied merger histories.
  • Because MI detects any statistical dependence, pairing angular position with other chemical abundances (e.g. [α/Fe]) instead of a binary median split could reveal substructures invisible in the low/high split, including overlapping debris with opposite metallicity trends.
  • A testable prediction for the Milky Way: after masking known satellites and streams, angular-metallicity MI computed from survey stars should remain above the shuffled control only inside ~50 kpc; if the residual appears at larger radii, either the particle-tagging prescription or the assumed accretion history would need revision.
  • The cumulative definition may bias the plateau location toward the radius where the sparse outer halo first dominates the counts; a shell-based MI estimator with careful shot-noise control would test whether the saturation is a physical boundary or a cumulative-count artifact.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies an information-theoretic framework to five Aquarius DM-only stellar-halo mock catalogs (Lowing et al. 2015). Stars are split into high- and low-metallicity subsamples relative to the sample median, and the authors compute the whole-sky Shannon-entropy anisotropy a(r) and the mutual information I_r(X;Z) between HEALPix angular pixel and metallicity class as functions of cumulative galactocentric radius. The analysis is repeated after removing SUBFIND-identified bound satellites and against shuffled-label randomized controls. The central claims are: (i) low-metallicity stars are more anisotropic than high-metallicity stars in the full halos, with a reversal after satellite removal; (ii) I_r(X;Z) rises with radius and diverges systematically from randomized controls before saturating; and (iii) after satellite removal the residual excess MI is confined to the inner ~30–50 kpc, interpreted as incomplete phase mixing of massive, early-accreted progenitors.

Significance. If the reported trends are robust, the MI diagnostic is a genuinely new and potentially powerful complement to MDF and anisotropy analyses, and the shuffled-label randomized control is an appropriate internal null. The use of publicly available mock catalogs and the before/after satellite comparison are strengths that aid reproducibility. However, the combination of an unstated HEALPix pixel scale, a data-derived median split with no robustness tests, and the acknowledged absence of any in-situ component currently limit the strength of the Milky Way generalizations. The core idea is sound, but several load-bearing choices need to be pinned down before the observational claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1–3.2, Eq. (3.1)–(3.6)] The HEALPix Nside is never specified, although Npix enters both the anisotropy a(r) via Hmax = log Npix and the mutual information I_r(X;Z) through the pixel probabilities. All reported amplitudes and radial trends are therefore conditional on an unstated pixel scale, and the text's characterization of MI as 'parameter-free' (Section 3.2) is not justified. Please state Nside and show that Figs. 4–7 are robust to at least two alternative Nside values. Without this, the quantitative central claim is not reproducible.
  2. [§3.2, median-metallicity split] The binary low/high metallicity split is derived from the same sample used to measure the correlation, and no robustness tests are given. A median split by construction balances the two classes, but MI can be sensitive to the threshold, and the interpretation in terms of 'metal-poor' vs 'metal-rich' populations assumes this dichotomy is chemically meaningful. Please add tests with alternative quantiles or, ideally, a continuous [Fe/H] MI estimator, and show that the radial rise and the post-satellite-removal inner signal persist. This is load-bearing because all MI and anisotropy results use this split.
  3. [§4.1 and §5] The paper acknowledges in §4.1 that 'all stars in Aquarius are of accreted origin and there is no explicit in-situ component,' yet the Introduction and Conclusions present the method as disentangling in-situ formation from accretion and generalize to the Milky Way's inner halo and Gaia-Enceladus. The residual MI signal after satellite removal is confined to the inner ~30–50 kpc, which is exactly the region where a real Milky Way-like galaxy has a substantial in-situ/disk component. The absence of in-situ stars can alter both the median split and the angular-metallicity correlation in that region, so this is a model-fidelity limitation that is load-bearing for the observational relevance. Either temper the Milky Way conclusions or validate the inner-halo claim against a hydro simulation (e.g., Auriga or ARTEMIS) that includes in-situ stars.
  4. [§4.4–4.5, Figs. 4–7] The central claim is that the data diverge 'systematically' from randomized controls, but no significance test or confidence interval for ΔI_r(X;Z) is reported. The figures show 1σ jackknife error bars from only 10 resamples, but there is no statement of where the data lie in the shuffle distribution (e.g., percentile rank, or fraction of shuffles exceeding the data). Some panels (e.g., Aq-A in Fig. 7, Aq-B in Fig. 6) visually show data and control curves very close at small radii, making the 'divergence' claim quantitatively under-supported. Please add a per-radius significance measure based on the shuffle distribution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1] A stray '[20]' appears at the end of the paragraph ending '... smaller progenitor galaxies than there really were.' It should be removed or attached to the correct sentence.
  2. [Figure 5] The y-axis label reads 'I_r(X;Z)' but the figure shows ΔI_r(X;Z); relabel to avoid confusion.
  3. [§3.2] The cumulative radial grid is never specified ('for any chosen cumulative radius r'). Please state the number of radii and their spacing; otherwise Figs. 2–7 are not fully reproducible.
  4. [Figs. 2–7] Only 10 jackknife samples are used for error bars. More resamples (or bootstrap) would give more stable 1σ estimates, though this does not affect the main conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: MI is computed from simulation data with an internal shuffled-label null; self-citations are ancillary.

full rationale

The load-bearing claim—that Ir(X;Z) grows with radius and exceeds shuffled-label controls, and that satellite removal leaves a residual inner-halo signal—is obtained by direct computation on the Aquarius mock catalogs, not by fitting a parameter to that outcome. The randomized controls (Section 3.2: 'the metallicity labels are randomly shuffled among the stars within r') define an internal null, so the divergence of the data curve is an empirical result rather than a construction. The median-metallicity split fixes the two classes once from the full sample; it does not encode the radial trend or the MI values. After SUBFIND satellite removal, the MI and anisotropy are recomputed rather than imported, so the after-removal residual is not assumed. The self-citations [43-45] supply the definition of the whole-sky anisotropy parameter and motivate the satellite-removal comparison ('Since satellites are known to dominate the anisotropy signal beyond ~60 h^-1 kpc [45]'), but that is ancillary to the MI analysis and, in any case, the satellites are explicitly removed and the signal recomputed in Section 4.5. The paper itself flags the main validity limitation in Section 4.1: 'All stars in Aquarius are of accreted origin and there is no explicit in-situ component.' That is a model-fidelity caveat for Milky Way generalization, not a circular reduction of the MI result. No equation is equivalent to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on data-derived thresholds (median split, HEALPix resolution) and on the fidelity of the Aquarius+tagging catalogs. No new physical entities are introduced; the mutual information is a statistical diagnostic, not a new object.

free parameters (5)
  • Median metallicity split threshold = per-halo median log10(Z/Zsun), not stated numerically
    Stars are divided into high/low metallicity using the median of the same data; this is a data-derived threshold and no robustness tests to alternative thresholds are provided.
  • HEALPix Nside = not stated in paper
    The angular resolution Nside sets the number of pixels Npix=12*Nside^2; it is never specified, although both the anisotropy and MI measurements depend on it.
  • Cumulative radius sampling grid = not specified
    The radial profiles use cumulative radii, but the number and spacing of r values are not given, which affects the apparent saturation behavior.
  • Number of random shuffles = not stated ('many times')
    The null MI distribution depends on the number of shuffles, which is not quantified.
  • Jackknife resampling scheme = 10 samples
    Error bars are computed from 10 jackknife samples, but the resampling procedure is not described in detail.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Aquarius level-2 DM-only halos plus GALFORM particle tagging produce stellar halos whose spatial and chemical structure is representative of real Milky Way-mass halos.
    All conclusions are drawn from these mock catalogs; no hydrodynamical or observed data are used.
  • domain assumption Bound satellites identified by SUBFIND cleanly separate surviving substructure from the smooth halo.
    The before/after satellite comparison assumes this decomposition is physically meaningful.
  • ad hoc to paper A binary split at the median metallicity captures the chemically relevant population dichotomy.
    The threshold is chosen from the data itself and no robustness tests are provided.
  • standard math Shannon entropy and mutual information computed with plug-in estimators and mass-weighting are valid for this sparsely populated pixelization.
    The equations are standard, but finite-sample bias is handled only by shuffled controls rather than by bias-corrected estimators.
  • standard math HEALPix equal-area pixelization of the sky as seen from the halo center is the correct angular representation.
    This is a standard all-sky pixelization and is appropriate for the anisotropy and MI calculations.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17199 in / 14890 out tokens · 137567 ms · 2026-08-03T19:30:45.091139+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The metallicity structure of stellar halos encodes the fossil record of galaxy assembly, tracing the chemical evolution and dynamical imprint of past mergers. Using five Milky Way-mass halos from the Aquarius simulations, we introduce an information-theoretic framework to quantify spatial-chemical correlations through the mutual information (MI) between angular position and metallicity. We divide stars in each halo into high- and low-metallicity populations based on their median metallicity and examine their metallicity distribution functions (MDFs), spatial anisotropies, and angular-metallicity couplings as a function of galactocentric radius. The MDFs exhibit remarkable diversity, ranging from single-peaked distributions dominated by one or two massive progenitors to broad or bimodal forms shaped by multiple accretion events, revealing the stochastic nature of halo assembly. The low-metallicity stars, primarily contributed by disrupted satellites, display higher spatial anisotropy and stronger angular clustering than their metal-rich counterparts. After removing bound satellites, anisotropy decreases significantly, yet high-metallicity stars remain marginally more anisotropic, reflecting the lingering debris of massive, centrally deposited progenitors. The mutual information between angular position and metallicity increases with radius before saturating in the outskirts, with the difference between the data and randomized controls confined mainly to the inner halo signifying residual spatial-chemical coupling driven by incomplete phase mixing. Our results demonstrate that information-theoretic diagnostics provide a powerful and intuitive way to quantify the chemical complexity of stellar halos and offer a promising route to compare simulations with forthcoming high-dimensional Galactic survey data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. Lian, M. Bergemann, A. Pillepich, G. Zasowski and R.R. Lane,The integrated metallicity profile of the Milky Way,Nature Astronomy7(2023) 951 [2306.14100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Monachesi, F.A

    A. Monachesi, F.A. Gómez, R.J.J. Grand, G. Kauffmann, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor et al.,On the stellar halo metallicity profile of Milky Way-like galaxies in the Auriga simulations,MNRAS459(2016) L46 [1512.03064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    D’Souza and E.F

    R. D’Souza and E.F. Bell,The masses and metallicities of stellar haloes reflect galactic merger histories, MNRAS474(2018) 5300 [1705.08442]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Gonzalez-Jara, P.B

    J. Gonzalez-Jara, P.B. Tissera, A. Monachesi, E. Sillero, D. Pallero, S. Pedrosa et al.,Unveiling the formation channels of stellar halos through their chemical fingerprints,A&A693(2025) A282 [2412.13483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Monachesi, F.A

    A. Monachesi, F.A. Gómez, R.J.J. Grand, C.M. Simpson, G. Kauffmann, S. Bustamante et al.,The Auriga stellar haloes: connecting stellar population properties with accretion and merging history, MNRAS485(2019) 2589 [1804.07798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Font, I.G

    A.S. Font, I.G. McCarthy, R. Poole-Mckenzie, S.G. Stafford, S.T. Brown, J. Schaye et al.,The ARTEMIS simulations: stellar haloes of Milky Way-mass galaxies,MNRAS498(2020) 1765 [2004.01914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Grand, F.A

    R.J.J. Grand, F.A. Gómez, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, D.J.R. Campbell et al.,The Auriga Project: the properties and formation mechanisms of disc galaxies across cosmic time,MNRAS467 (2017) 179 [1610.01159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Xue, H.-W

    X.-X. Xue, H.-W. Rix, Z. Ma, H. Morrison, J. Bovy, B. Sesar et al.,The Radial Profile and Flattening of the Milky Way’s Stellar Halo to 80 kpc from the SEGUE K-giant Survey,ApJ809(2015) 144 [1506.06144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Dietz, J

    S.E. Dietz, J. Yoon, T.C. Beers and V.M. Placco,The Metallicity Gradient and Complex Formation History of the Outermost Halo of the Milky Way,ApJ894(2020) 34 [1911.11140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    de Jong, B

    J.T.A. de Jong, B. Yanny, H.-W. Rix, A.E. Dolphin, N.F. Martin and T.C. Beers,Mapping the Stellar Structure of the Milky Way Thick Disk and Halo Using SEGUE Photometry,ApJ714(2010) 663 [0911.3900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Fernández-Alvar, C

    E. Fernández-Alvar, C. Allende Prieto, K.J. Schlesinger, T.C. Beers, A.C. Robin, D.P. Schneider et al., Deep SDSS optical spectroscopy of distant halo stars. II. Iron, calcium, and magnesium abundances, A&A577(2015) A81 [1503.04362]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Monachesi, E.F

    A. Monachesi, E.F. Bell, D.J. Radburn-Smith, J. Bailin, R.S. de Jong, B. Holwerda et al.,The GHOSTS survey - II. The diversity of halo colour and metallicity profiles of massive disc galaxies,MNRAS457 (2016) 1419 [1507.06657]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Yoon, T.C

    J. Yoon, T.C. Beers, S. Dietz, Y.S. Lee, V.M. Placco, G. Da Costa et al.,Galactic Archeology with the AEGIS Survey: The Evolution of Carbon and Iron in the Galactic Halo,ApJ861(2018) 146 [1806.04738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Conroy, R.P

    C. Conroy, R.P. Naidu, D. Zaritsky, A. Bonaca, P. Cargile, B.D. Johnson et al.,Resolving the Metallicity Distribution of the Stellar Halo with the H3 Survey,ApJ887(2019) 237 [1909.02007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Fattahi, V

    A. Fattahi, V. Belokurov, A.J. Deason, C.S. Frenk, F.A. Gómez, R.J.J. Grand et al.,The origin of galactic metal-rich stellar halo components with highly eccentric orbits,MNRAS484(2019) 4471 [1810.07779]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Malhan,Milky Way’s Metal-Poor Stars display Chemical Transition near the Solar Radius,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2508.08360 [2508.08360]

    K. Malhan,Milky Way’s Metal-Poor Stars display Chemical Transition near the Solar Radius,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2508.08360 [2508.08360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Grand, S

    R.J.J. Grand, S. Bustamante, F.A. Gómez, D. Kawata, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor et al.,Origin of chemically distinct discs in the Auriga cosmological simulations,MNRAS474(2018) 3629 [1708.07834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    S.-Y. Pu, A.P. Cooper, R.J.J. Grand, F.A. Gómez and A. Monachesi,Progenitor Diversity in the Accreted Stellar Halos of Milky Way–like Galaxies,ApJ980(2025) 63 [2410.13491]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Schörck, N

    T. Schörck, N. Christlieb, J.G. Cohen, T.C. Beers, S. Shectman, I. Thompson et al.,The stellar content of the Hamburg/ESO survey. V. The metallicity distribution function of the Galactic halo,A&A507 (2009) 817 [0809.1172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    D. An, T.C. Beers, J.A. Johnson, M.H. Pinsonneault, Y.S. Lee, J. Bovy et al.,The Stellar Metallicity Distribution Function of the Galactic Halo from SDSS Photometry,ApJ763(2013) 65 [1211.7073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Lamers, J.M.D

    H.J.G.L.M. Lamers, J.M.D. Kruijssen, N. Bastian, M. Rejkuba, M. Hilker and M. Kissler-Patig,The difference in metallicity distribution functions of halo stars and globular clusters as a function of galaxy type. A tracer of globular cluster formation and evolution,A&A606(2017) A85 [1706.00939]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    A. Mori, P. Di Matteo, S. Salvadori, S. Khoperskov, G. Pagnini and M. Haywood,Metallicity distributions of halo stars: do they trace the Galactic accretion history?,A&A690(2024) A136 [2401.13737]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Ibata, M

    R. Ibata, M. Irwin, G. Lewis, A.M.N. Ferguson and N. Tanvir,A giant stream of metal-rich stars in the halo of the galaxy M31,Nature412(2001) 49 [astro-ph/0107090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  24. [24]

    Kalirai, K.M

    J.S. Kalirai, K.M. Gilbert, P. Guhathakurta, S.R. Majewski, J.C. Ostheimer, R.M. Rich et al.,The Metal-poor Halo of the Andromeda Spiral Galaxy (M31)1,,ApJ648(2006) 389 [astro-ph/0605170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Cohen, J.S

    R.E. Cohen, J.S. Kalirai, K.M. Gilbert, P. Guhathakurta, M.S. Peeples, N. Lehner et al.,Project AMIGA: Distance and Metallicity Gradients along Andromeda’s Giant Southern Stream from the Red Clump,AJ156(2018) 230 [1810.01525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Carollo, T.C

    D. Carollo, T.C. Beers, Y.S. Lee, M. Chiba, J.E. Norris, R. Wilhelm et al.,Two stellar components in the halo of the Milky Way,Nature450(2007) 1020 [0706.3005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Carollo, T.C

    D. Carollo, T.C. Beers, M. Chiba, J.E. Norris, K.C. Freeman, Y.S. Lee et al.,Structure and Kinematics of the Stellar Halos and Thick Disks of the Milky Way Based on Calibration Stars from Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7,ApJ712(2010) 692 [0909.3019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Helmi and S.D.M

    A. Helmi and S.D.M. White,Building up the stellar halo of the Galaxy,MNRAS307(1999) 495 [astro-ph/9901102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Kafle, S

    P.R. Kafle, S. Sharma, G.F. Lewis and J. Bland-Hawthorn,Metallicity bias in the kinematics of the Milky Way stellar halo,MNRAS430(2013) 2973 [1212.4576]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Belokurov, J.L

    V. Belokurov, J.L. Sanders, A. Fattahi, M.C. Smith, A.J. Deason, N.W. Evans et al.,The biggest splash, MNRAS494(2020) 3880 [1909.04679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Lowing, W

    B. Lowing, W. Wang, A. Cooper, R. Kennedy, J. Helly, S. Cole et al.,Creating mock catalogues of stellar haloes from cosmological simulations,MNRAS446(2015) 2274 [1406.2320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Springel, J

    V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, A. Ludlow, A. Jenkins, A. Helmi et al.,The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes,MNRAS391(2008) 1685 [0809.0898]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Springel, S.D.M

    V. Springel, S.D.M. White, C.S. Frenk, J.F. Navarro, A. Jenkins, M. Vogelsberger et al.,Prospects for detecting supersymmetric dark matter in the Galactic halo,Nature456(2008) 73 [0809.0894]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Navarro, A

    J.F. Navarro, A. Ludlow, V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, S.D.M. White et al.,The diversity and similarity of simulated cold dark matter haloes,MNRAS402(2010) 21 [0810.1522]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    Spergel, L

    D.N. Spergel, L. Verde, H.V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, M.R. Nolta, C.L. Bennett et al.,First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,ApJS 148(2003) 175 [astro-ph/0302209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    Colless, G

    M. Colless, G. Dalton, S. Maddox, W. Sutherland, P. Norberg, S. Cole et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts,MNRAS328(2001) 1039 [astro-ph/0106498]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Cooper, S

    A.P. Cooper, S. Cole, C.S. Frenk, S.D.M. White, J. Helly, A.J. Benson et al.,Galactic stellar haloes in the CDM model,MNRAS406(2010) 744 [0910.3211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    S. Cole, A. Aragon-Salamanca, C.S. Frenk, J.F. Navarro and S.E. Zepf,A recipe for galaxy formation., MNRAS271(1994) 781 [astro-ph/9402001]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  39. [39]

    Cole, C.G

    S. Cole, C.G. Lacey, C.M. Baugh and C.S. Frenk,Hierarchical galaxy formation,MNRAS319(2000) 168 [astro-ph/0007281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [40]

    Bower, A.J

    R.G. Bower, A.J. Benson, R. Malbon, J.C. Helly, C.S. Frenk, C.M. Baugh et al.,Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation,MNRAS370(2006) 645 [astro-ph/0511338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    Springel, S.D.M

    V. Springel, S.D.M. White, G. Tormen and G. Kauffmann,Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0,MNRAS328(2001) 726 [astro-ph/0012055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    Asplund, A.M

    M. Asplund, A.M. Amarsi and N. Grevesse,The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision,A&A653 (2021) A141 [2105.01661]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Pandey,A new method for testing isotropy with Shannon entropy,MNRAS462(2016) 1630 [1512.03562]

    B. Pandey,A new method for testing isotropy with Shannon entropy,MNRAS462(2016) 1630 [1512.03562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Pandey,Tomography of stellar halos: what does anisotropy in a stellar halo tell us?,JCAP2022 (2022) 058 [2204.08425]

    B. Pandey,Tomography of stellar halos: what does anisotropy in a stellar halo tell us?,JCAP2022 (2022) 058 [2204.08425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Mondal and B

    A. Mondal and B. Pandey,Probing the spatial and velocity anisotropies in stellar haloes from the Aquarius simulations,MNRAS533(2024) 3426 [2309.10798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Górski, E

    K.M. Górski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al.,HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere,ApJ 622(2005) 759 [astro-ph/0409513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    Shannon,A mathematical theory of communication,Bell Labs Technical Journal27(1948) 379

    C.E. Shannon,A mathematical theory of communication,Bell Labs Technical Journal27(1948) 379

    1948

  48. [48]

    Pandey and S

    B. Pandey and S. Sarkar,How much a galaxy knows about its large-scale environment?: An information theoretic perspective,MNRAS467(2017) L6 [1611.00283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Chiba and T.C

    M. Chiba and T.C. Beers,Structure of the Galactic Stellar Halo Prior to Disk Formation,ApJ549 (2001) 325 [astro-ph/0011113]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  50. [50]

    Schlaufman, C.M

    K.C. Schlaufman, C.M. Rockosi, Y.S. Lee, T.C. Beers and C. Allende Prieto,Insight into the Formation of the Milky Way through Cold Halo Substructure. II. The Elemental Abundances of ECHOS,ApJ734 (2011) 49 [1104.1424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Helmi, C

    A. Helmi, C. Babusiaux, H.H. Koppelman, D. Massari, J. Veljanoski and A.G.A. Brown,The merger that led to the formation of the Milky Way’s inner stellar halo and thick disk,Nature563(2018) 85 [1806.06038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Vallenari, A.G.A

    Gaia Collaboration, A. Vallenari, A.G.A. Brown, T. Prusti, J.H.J. de Bruijne, F. Arenou et al.,Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties,A&A674(2023) A1 [2208.00211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Majewski, R.P

    S.R. Majewski, R.P. Schiavon, P.M. Frinchaboy, C. Allende Prieto, R. Barkhouser, D. Bizyaev et al.,The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE),AJ154(2017) 94 [1509.05420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    De Silva, K.C

    G.M. De Silva, K.C. Freeman, J. Bland-Hawthorn, S. Martell, E.W. de Boer, M. Asplund et al.,The GALAH survey: scientific motivation,MNRAS449(2015) 2604 [1502.04767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Jin, S.C

    S. Jin, S.C. Trager, G.B. Dalton, J.A.L. Aguerri, J.E. Drew, J. Falcón-Barroso et al.,The wide-field, multiplexed, spectroscopic facility WEAVE: Survey design, overview, and simulated implementation, MNRAS530(2024) 2688 [2212.03981]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024