Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Locally driving a single site in a dissipative Lieb lattice can turn the destructive interference that creates flat bands into a source of antibunched light on a neighbouring dark site.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 19:07 UTC pith:3AKMUPAK

load-bearing objection A genuinely new UPB-in-lattices result with a solid three-site analytic core, but the flat-band connection is not proven by the confounded control in Sec. III E. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.01645 v2 pith:3AKMUPAK submitted 2025-12-01 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics

Antibunching in locally driven dissipative Lieb lattices

Alex Ferrier , Micha{\l} Matuszewski , Piotr Deuar , Marzena H. Szyma\'nska This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics
keywords unconventional photon blockadeLieb latticeflat bandantibunchingdriven-dissipative Bose-Hubbardpositive-P methodpolariton micropillarssecond-order correlations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows numerically that in a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model on a Lieb lattice, applying a coherent drive to one C site produces strong antibunching (g^(2)(0)=0.468) on the adjacent dark B site. The effect shares its physical origin with unconventional photon blockade: destructive interference cancels the two-boson amplitude on the target site. By breaking the flat band through a large detuning on C sites, the antibunching essentially disappears (g^(2)(0) rises to 0.948), demonstrating that the same interference underlies both phenomena. The authors optimize parameters for polariton micropillar experiments and show that adding a background drive can double the oscillation period of the correlations, making the effect easier to observe with finite-time-resolution detectors. If correct, this provides a scalable route to generating non-classical photon statistics in extended open quantum lattices without requiring strong nonlinearities.

Core claim

The paper claims that in a locally driven Lieb lattice, the destructive interference which produces the flat band and dark B sites can be repurposed to suppress double occupation of a chosen dark site, yielding enhanced antibunching via a mechanism analogous to unconventional photon blockade. Concretely, for a five-unit-cell quasi-1D chain with drive F=J=3γ, U=0.1γ, and Δ=-0.2γ, the adjacent site 3B reaches g^(2)(0)=0.468, while A and C sites remain nearly coherent. Destroying the flat band by setting Δ_C=-5γ reduces the effect to g^(2)(0)=0.948, directly linking the antibunching to the same interference that creates the flat band. The work also demonstrates the effect in a 2D Lieb lattice a

What carries the argument

Unconventional photon blockade (UPB): the cancellation of the two-boson occupation amplitude on a target site by destructive interference between different excitation paths, here enabled by the same geometric frustration that makes B sites dark in a Lieb lattice. The analytical optimization for a single unit cell (three-site chain) is derived from a weak-driving two-boson ansatz, setting the C_020 amplitude to zero and yielding closed-form equations for the optimal detuning and hopping.

Load-bearing premise

The central numerical claim rests on the positive-P method with 2000 trajectories yielding converged, unbiased steady-state and second-order correlation functions for the extended lattices, with no convergence tests or code provided; the analytical parameter optimization additionally assumes weak driving while the simulations operate at F≈γ.

What would settle it

Compute g^(2)(0) on site 3B of the five-unit-cell chain using an independent method (e.g., a matrix-product-state based master equation solver or exact diagonalization for a reduced lattice) at U=0.1γ, Δ=-0.2γ, F=J=3.0γ; if the result deviates significantly from the reported 0.468, the positive-P sampling is biased. Alternatively, in a Lieb micropillar lattice, measure g^(2)(0) on the dark site adjacent to a locally driven C site while detuning C sites to destroy the flat band; the predicted jump from ~0.45 to ~0.95 either occurs or it does not.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single local drive can generate antibunching on a preselected site of an extended lattice, offering a scalable alternative to two-site UPB devices.
  • The effect provides experimentally accessible parameters for polariton micropillar lattices, with g^(2)(0) below 0.5 and occupations above 0.1 at U/γ=0.1.
  • Adding a background drive on other C sites allows the hopping J to be halved while maintaining antibunching, doubling the oscillation period of g^(2)(τ) and easing detector time-resolution requirements.
  • The link between flat-band interference and antibunching implies that measuring g^(2)(0) on dark sites can act as a probe of flat-band integrity in real lattices.
  • Local driving schemes can be extended to other lattice geometries and to other correlation functions, broadening the toolkit for quantum correlations in driven-dissipative systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interference mechanism could be exploited to generate entanglement or squeezed states between multiple dark sites in larger two-dimensional Lieb lattices, where multiple B sites are simultaneously addressed.
  • If the flat-band connection is robust, disorder or perturbations that break the flat band should degrade antibunching, making g^(2)(0) on dark sites a sensitive diagnostic for flat-band physics in experiments.
  • The positive-P results for extended lattices could be cross-checked against tensor-network or exact diagonalization methods on small systems; agreement would strengthen the reliability of the stochastic approach for multi-time correlations in open lattices.
  • Frustrated geometries other than Lieb lattices (e.g., kagome or pyrochlore) that also host dark sites may support analogous UPB-like antibunching under localized driving.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model on Lieb lattices with a coherent drive applied locally to a C site. It first derives, in the weak-driving limit, analytic conditions for optimal antibunching on the middle B site of a three-site chain (Eqs. (6)–(8) and Appendix A). It then uses positive-P stochastic simulations to show that on quasi-1D Lieb lattices (and in one 2D example) the B site adjacent to the drive exhibits strong antibunching, e.g. g^(2)(0)=0.468 for U=0.1γ, Δ=-0.2γ, F=J=3.0γ in the 5-cell system. The authors optimize parameters for observability in polariton micropillar experiments, introduce a background drive to recover antibunching at lower J, and present a flat-band control in Sec. III E that they interpret as evidence for a common destructive-interference origin of the flat band and the enhanced antibunching.

Significance. If the numerical results are reliable, this is a useful extension of unconventional photon blockade from dimers to extended lattice geometries: it demonstrates that local driving can create non-classical correlations on selected dark sites of a Lieb lattice, and it identifies practical advantages (longer oscillation period in g^(2)(τ), reduced side peaks) that are relevant to polariton micropillar experiments. The analytic three-site derivation is transparent and internally consistent, and the positive-P method is, in principle, an exact stochastic technique for this model. The main qualifications are the absence of convergence/error-bar information for the numerics and the weak control used to connect the effect to flat-band interference.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III E, Fig. 10] The control for the flat-band claim is confounded. Changing Δ_C from -0.2γ to -5.0γ simultaneously destroys the flat band and moves the driven C site 5γ off resonance relative to the laser tuned to A/B. The reduced effective drive lowers the B-site occupation; at low occupancy any weakly driven nonlinear system tends to g^(2)(0)→1, so the observed 0.948 does not specifically implicate flat-band interference. Since Sec. IV uses this result to argue for a common destructive-interference origin, please supply a control that breaks the flat band while keeping the C sites on resonance (e.g., detuning the A sublattice, or a staggered hopping), or otherwise match the B-site occupation across the comparison.
  2. [Sec. II; Figs. 13–17] No convergence tests are reported for the positive-P simulations. The paper states that 2000 samples are used, but most g^(2)(0) values in parameter scans are plotted without error bars, and some key numbers (e.g., g^(2)(0)=0.468 in Fig. 6) are quoted without uncertainty. Because the parameter choices in Secs. III C/D and Appendix B are optima of these curves, it is essential to know whether the reported minima are significant. Please add error bars or statistical bootstrap uncertainties, and provide a convergence check (e.g., trajectory number, or comparison with an exact master equation/DMRG calculation for a small system).
  3. [Appendix A; Sec. III A] The analytic optimal condition is derived in the weak-driving limit (amplitude hierarchy A2, linearized density matrix A3). The numerical demonstration of the 3-site optimum uses F=γ (Fig. 3), and the extended lattices use F=J=3γ, i.e., outside the assumed weak-driving regime. The agreement at F=γ is encouraging, but the paper does not quantify the range of validity of the analytic formulas or show that the same two-boson interference mechanism is operative at the drive strengths of the main results. Please test the ansatz against exact numerics as a function of F, or explicitly restrict the analytic-optimum claim to weak driving.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. II] The abstract states that positive-P allows one to calculate correlations 'exactly' for extended lattices. With a finite number of trajectories (2000), the results are only exact in the limit of large samples and sufficient dissipation; please soften the wording or state the finite-sample nature explicitly.
  2. [Fig. 3] The text says that for sites A and C the g^(2)(τ) values are 'approximately equal' at all τ, but this is not shown or explained. Please either display these curves or give a brief reason for the equivalence.
  3. [Sec. III E] For the flat-band comparison, please report the B-site occupations n for both Δ_C cases. The interpretation of g^(2)(0)≈0.948 as 'weak antibunching' depends strongly on whether the occupation is also strongly reduced in the off-resonant case.
  4. [Sec. II; Appendix B] Please specify the time step δt, the number of steady-state time samples N_t, and the total integration time used in the positive-P simulations, in addition to the total trajectory count.
  5. [Figs. 7 and 9] The 'period' of the oscillations in g^(2)(τ) is described as the gap between the two maxima adjacent to τ=0, but this quantity is not formally defined. Please define it precisely, especially because it is used to claim a doubling of the period at lower J.
  6. [Reproducibility] The simulations use the xmds2 package, but no code or data availability statement is included. Providing scripts or data would strengthen reproducibility, particularly for the parameter scans in Appendix B.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; the analytic UPB condition is derived from the Hamiltonian, the positive-P simulations provide an independent numerical check, and parameter choices are explicitly disclosed as optimizations rather than independent predictions.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular. Equations (6)–(8) in Sec. III A and Appendix A are obtained by applying the standard weak-driving two-boson ansatz from Ref. [41] and imposing the condition that the two-boson occupation amplitude on the central B site vanishes (C020 = 0). This is a design target derived from the model, not a parameter fitted to the simulation output. The positive-P simulations in Fig. 3 then independently evaluate g^(2)(0) at those analytic parameters, giving a nontrivial numerical check at finite drive. For the larger lattices, the paper is transparent that parameter choices are optimized using the simulation results themselves: Sec. III B states that 'any optimisation of the physical parameters must instead be performed using the results of the positive-P simulations,' and Sec. III C says 'From that analysis we choose the parameters ... as a primary example that provides a good compromise between minimising g^(2)(0) on site 3B.' Thus the reported g^(2)(0) values at the chosen parameters are optima, not independent predictions; this is a disclosed optimization procedure, not circularity. The self-citations to Ref. [36] (positive-P implementation) and Ref. [57] (multi-time correlations) are methodological and supported by prior published work and standard positive-P theory; there is no load-bearing appeal to an unverified self-cited uniqueness theorem. The flat-band control in Sec. III E is arguably confounded (changing Δ_C to −5γ both destroys the flat band and moves the driven C site far off resonance), and no convergence tests are shown for the 2000-trajectory positive-P averages. These are legitimate correctness or inference-quality caveats, but they do not amount to the paper's conclusions being equivalent to its inputs by construction. Overall, the derivation is self-contained and the numerical results are computed from the model rather than imported from the target claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard open quantum lattice model plus a numerical method; no new entities are introduced. The key 'free' choices are experimental parameters tuned to minimize g2(0). The analytic optimal-parameter equations are derived, not fitted, but assume weak driving.

free parameters (5)
  • Detuning Δ = -0.28γ (3-site), -0.2γ (lattices)
    Chosen by analytic optimization Eq. (7) or numerical scan to minimize g2(0); not fixed by first principles.
  • Hopping J = 2.775γ (3-site), 3.0γ or 1.5γ (lattices)
    Optimized to balance antibunching depth, occupation, and oscillation period; Eq. (8) for 3-site, Appendix B scans for lattices.
  • Drive strength F = 0.5γ to 4.0γ
    Trade-off: smaller F improves antibunching but lowers occupation; values chosen for observability.
  • Background drive F_bg = 0.8γ
    Added to restore antibunching at lower J and double the oscillation period; optimized in Appendix B.
  • Interaction U = 0.1γ
    Representative value in the positive-P validity regime and accessible to polariton experiments; robustness to variation is shown in Fig. 16.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model with on-site Kerr nonlinearity and Markovian local dissipation (Eqs. 1–2) describes polariton micropillar lattices.
    Standard model; no derivation from the microscopic polariton Hamiltonian; ignores disorder, site-energy offsets, and non-Markovian effects.
  • domain assumption Positive-P stochastic equations (3) yield exact quantum expectation values in the limit of many trajectories and sufficient dissipation.
    Established in ref. [36], but practical convergence for the extended lattices here is assumed rather than demonstrated in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The weak-driving, two-boson Fock-state ansatz and amplitude hierarchy (A1)–(A3) are valid for the 3-site analytic optimisation.
    Used to derive Eqs. (6)–(8); assumes F is small compared with γ, J, Δ, which is only marginally satisfied for F = γ.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting the B-site double-occupation amplitude C020 = 0 gives the optimal antibunching condition on that site.
    This is the UPB criterion imported from ref. [41] and applied to the 3-site chain.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16018 in / 14029 out tokens · 148315 ms · 2026-08-03T19:07:53.948459+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In Lieb lattices, geometric frustration and destructive interference of hopping cancels the occupation of certain sites, leading to flat-band physics. Here, we show numerically how, in the driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard (DDBH) model arranged into Lieb lattices and related geometries, specific localised driving schemes can repurpose this interference to generate enhanced antibunching via a mechanism similar to the so-called unconventional photon blockade. Stochastic simulations using the positive-P method allow us to calculate occupations and second order correlations exactly for extended lattices. We use this to optimise the parameters for the possible observation of this effect in polariton micropillar experiments. This work demonstrates the possibility of using localised driving and interference effects to generate non-trivial quantum correlations in open quantum lattice systems. Specifically, producing antibunching in the dark sites of the flat band system rather than the usual and less useful bunching.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01645 by Alex Ferrier, Marzena H. Szyma\'nska, Micha{\l} Matuszewski, Piotr Deuar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Diagram of a single Lieb lattice unit cell, equivalent to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Second order correlations g (2) j (τ ) on the B site using op￾timised parameters ∆ = −0.28γ, U = 0.1γ, J = 2.775γ, for two different values of the coherent drive F applied to site C. Note that in both cases, g (2) j (τ ) for sites A and C are approximately equal at all τ . B. Exploring larger structures We now go on to explore these effects in larger structures, to investigate if any further advantage can … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 5 site chain driven locally at central site. (a) Diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the values of n and g (2)(0) across the lat￾tice that result for one example set of parameters, U = 0.1γ, ∆ = −0.2γ, F = J = 3.0γ. The occupation n on each of the sublattices A, B, C appears to decay roughly exponen￾tially with distance from the driven site. Much like what is typically seen for the flat band mode of Lieb lattices [20, 22, 24, 25, 35, 36], the B sites are “dark", with occu￾pations typ… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Diagram of locally driven quasi-1D Lieb lattice of 5 unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Second order temporal correlations g (2)(τ ) on site 3B of the 5 unit cell quasi-1D DDBH Lieb lattice driven on site 3C. Parameters are U = 0.1γ, ∆ = −0.2γ, F = J = 3.0γ. As such, in what follows we focus on the values of n and g (2) in the site 3B adjacent to the driven site 3C. Details of our investigations into optimising the system parameters for observing the antibunching on this site are given in App… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Second order temporal correlations g (2)(τ ) on site 3B of the 5 unit cell quasi-1D DDBH Lieb lattice driven as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Diagram of locally driven 2D Lieb lattice of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Occupation spectrum n˜(k, ω) (colour scale, arbi￾trary units) of 20 unit cell quasi-1D Lieb lattice driven locally on site 11C for parameters U = 0.1γ, ∆ = ∆A = ∆B = −0.2γ, F = J = 3.0γ for ∆C = ∆ (top) and ∆C = −5.0γ (bottom). Sin￾gle particle spectra in both cases are shown as grey lines. We probe the relation between the flat band and the en￾hanced antibunching by looking at how altering the system so … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Occupation n (left panel) and second order correlation g (2)(0) (right panel) across a 5 × 5 unit cell 2D DDBH Lieb lattice driven on sites (3, 3)C and (3, 4)C. Parameters are U = 0.1γ, ∆ = −0.2γ, F = J = 3.0γ. photon blockade, significant antibunching on the relevant B site results when the parameters are tuned such that interfer￾ence of the hopping terms from adjacent sites eliminates the amplitude for … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Variation in n and g (2)(0) of site 3B with drive strength F at fixed J = 3.0γ (left panel) and when maintaining relation F = J (right panel). Other parameters are fixed as U = 0.1γ, ∆ = −0.2γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Variation in n and g (2)(0) of site 3B with U. Other parameters are fixed as ∆ = −0.2γ, F = J = 3.0γ. The first consideration is the dependence on the local en￾ergy detuning ∆, which is given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: It can be seen that a minimum value of g (2)(0) = 0.45, comparable to that achieved in the ideal case chosen in section III C, is reached for values of Fbg between 0.8γ and 0.95γ. While increasing Fbg does also have the effect of slowly decreasing the occupation n of 3B, the occupation for Fbg = 0.8γ is still similar to that for the example of section III C. As such, the addition of the background drive a… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quan- tum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 565 (2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    Walther, B

    H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B.-G. Englert, and T. Becker, Cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics 69, 1325 (2006). 12

    2006

  4. [4]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1379 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Schmidt and J

    S. Schmidt and J. Koch, Circuit qed lattices: Towards quantum simulation with superconducting circuits, Annalen der Physik 525, 395 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. Türeci, and J. Koch, On-chip quantum sim- ulation with superconducting circuits, Nature Physics8, 292 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    J. M. Fink, A. Dombi, A. Vukics, A. Wallraff, and P. Domokos, Observation of the photon-blockade breakdown phase transi- tion, Phys. Rev. X7, 011012 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y . Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Hyperbolic lat- tices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature571, 45–50 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Carusotto, D

    I. Carusotto, D. Gerace, H. E. Tureci, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and A. Imamo ˇglu, Fermionized photons in an array of driven dissipative nonlinear cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 033601 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    R. O. Umucal ılar and I. Carusotto, Fractional quantum hall states of photons in an array of dissipative coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 206809 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Kasprzak, S

    J. Kasprzak, S. Reitzenstein, E. A. Muljarov, C. Kistner, C. Schneider, M. Strauss, S. Höfling, A. Forchel, and W. Lang- bein, Up on the jaynes–cummings ladder of a quantum- dot/microcavity system, Nature Materials9, 304 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Amo and J

    A. Amo and J. Bloch, Exciton-polaritons in lattices: A non- linear photonic simulator, Comptes Rendus Physique17, 934 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Schneider, K

    C. Schneider, K. Winkler, M. D. Fraser, M. Kamp, Y . Ya- mamoto, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and S. Höfling, Exciton-polariton trapping and potential landscape engineering, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016503 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    C. W. Lai, N. Y . Kim, S. Utsunomiya, G. Roumpos, H. Deng, M. D. Fraser, T. Byrnes, P. Recher, N. Kumada, T. Fujisawa, and Y . Yamamoto, Coherent zero-state andπ-state in an exci- ton–polariton condensate array, Nature450, 529–532 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    N. Y . Kim, K. Kusudo, C. Wu, N. Masumoto, A. Löf- fler, S. Höfling, N. Kumada, L. Worschech, A. Forchel, and Y . Yamamoto, Dynamical d-wave condensation of exci- ton–polaritons in a two-dimensional square-lattice potential, Nature Physics7, 681–686 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Tanese, H

    D. Tanese, H. Flayac, D. Solnyshkov, A. Amo, A. Lemaître, E. Galopin, R. Braive, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Polariton condensation in solitonic gap states in a one-dimensional periodic potential, Nature Communications4, 1749 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Tanese, E

    D. Tanese, E. Gurevich, F. Baboux, T. Jacqmin, A. Lemaître, E. Galopin, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and E. Akker- mans, Fractal energy spectrum of a polariton gas in a fibonacci quasiperiodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 146404 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Zhang, S

    B. Zhang, S. Brodbeck, Z. Wang, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, and H. Deng, Coupling polariton quantum boxes in sub-wavelength grating microcavities, Applied Physics Letters 106, 051104 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Baboux, L

    F. Baboux, L. Ge, T. Jacqmin, M. Biondi, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, S. Schmidt, H. E. Türeci, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, Bosonic condensation and disorder- induced localization in a flat band, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 066402 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V . Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topo- logical edge states of a one-dimensional lattice, Nature Photon- ics11, 651–656 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. H. Harder, O. A. Egorov, K. Winkler, H. Su- chomel, J. Beierlein, M. Emmerling, C. Schneider, and S. Höfling, Polariton condensation in s- and p-flatbands in a two-dimensional lieb lattice, Applied Physics Letters111, 231102 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. Harder, O. Egorov, K. Winkler, R. Ge, M. Ban- dres, M. Emmerling, L. Worschech, T. Liew, M. Segev, et al., Exciton-polariton topological insulator, Nature562, 552 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    C. E. Whittaker, E. Cancellieri, P. M. Walker, D. R. Gule- vich, H. Schomerus, D. Vaitiekus, B. Royall, D. M. Whittaker, E. Clarke, I. V . Iorsh, I. A. Shelykh, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Exciton polaritons in a two-dimensional lieb lattice with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 097401 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Goblot, B

    V . Goblot, B. Rauer, F. Vicentini, A. Le Boité, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, S. Ravets, C. Ciuti, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, Nonlinear polariton fluids in a flatband reveal discrete gap solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 113901 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Mili ´cevi´c, G

    M. Mili ´cevi´c, G. Montambaux, T. Ozawa, O. Jamadi, B. Real, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaître, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Type-iii and tilted dirac cones emerging from flat bands in photonic orbital graphene, Phys. Rev. X9, 031010 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    R. Su, S. Ghosh, J. Wang, S. Liu, C. Diederichs, T. C. H. Liew, and Q. Xiong, Observation of exciton polariton condensation in a perovskite lattice at room temperature, Nature Physics16, 301–306 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    N. H. M. Dang, D. Gerace, E. Drouard, G. Trippé-Allard, F. Lédée, R. Mazurczyk, E. Deleporte, C. Seassal, and H. S. Nguyen, Tailoring dispersion of room-temperature exciton- polaritons with perovskite-based subwavelength metasurfaces, Nano Letters20, 2113 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Dusel, S

    M. Dusel, S. Betzold, O. Egorov, S. Klembt, J. Ohmer, U. Fis- cher, S. Höfling, and C. Schneider, Room temperature organic exciton-polariton condensate in a lattice, Nature Communica- tions11, 2863 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Brennecke, T

    F. Brennecke, T. Donner, S. Ritter, T. Bourdel, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Cavity qed with a bose–einstein condensate, Na- ture450, 268 (2007)

    2007

  31. [31]

    Usaj, Localization engineering by resonant driving in dissi- pative polariton arrays, SciPost Phys

    G. Usaj, Localization engineering by resonant driving in dissi- pative polariton arrays, SciPost Phys. Core7, 052 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Muñoz de las Heras, A

    A. Muñoz de las Heras, A. Amo, and A. González-Tudela, Nonlinearity-enabled localization in driven-dissipative pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. A109, 063523 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Biondi, E

    M. Biondi, E. P. L. van Nieuwenburg, G. Blatter, S. D. Huber, and S. Schmidt, Incompressible polaritons in a flat band, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 143601 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Hyrkäs, V

    M. Hyrkäs, V . Apaja, and M. Manninen, Many-particle dynam- ics of bosons and fermions in quasi-one-dimensional flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. A87, 023614 (2013)

    2013

  35. [35]

    Casteels, R

    W. Casteels, R. Rota, F. Storme, and C. Ciuti, Probing photon correlations in the dark sites of geometrically frustrated cavity lattices, Phys. Rev. A93, 043833 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Deuar, A

    P. Deuar, A. Ferrier, M. Matuszewski, G. Orso, and M. H. Szyma´nska, Fully quantum scalable description of driven- dissipative lattice models, PRX Quantum2, 010319 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise(Springer, 2004)

    2004

  38. [38]

    Muñoz-Matutano, A

    G. Muñoz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. 13 Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues, B. Besga, M. Richard, and T. V olz, Emergence of quantum correlations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nature Materials18, 213–218 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Delteil, T

    A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. Höfling, C. Schneider, and A. ˙Imamo˘glu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exci- ton–polaritons, Nature Materials18, 219–222 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    T. C. H. Liew and V . Savona, Single photons from coupled quantum modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 183601 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Bamba, A

    M. Bamba, A. Imamo ˘glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A83, 021802 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    Bamba and C

    M. Bamba and C. Ciuti, Counter-polarized single-photon gen- eration from the auxiliary cavity of a weakly nonlinear photonic molecule, Applied Physics Letters99, 171111 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Ferretti, L

    S. Ferretti, L. C. Andreani, H. E. Türeci, and D. Gerace, Photon correlations in a two-site nonlinear cavity system under coher- ent drive and dissipation, Phys. Rev. A82, 013841 (2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V . Savona, Input-output theory of the unconven- tional photon blockade, Phys. Rev. A88, 033836 (2013)

    2013

  45. [45]

    Ferretti, V

    S. Ferretti, V . Savona, and D. Gerace, Optimal antibunching in passive photonic devices based on coupled nonlinear res- onators, New Journal of Physics15, 025012 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    T. C. H. Liew and V . Savona, Multimode entanglement in cou- pled cavity arrays, New Journal of Physics15, 025015 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    Gerace and V

    D. Gerace and V . Savona, Unconventional photon blockade in doubly resonant microcavities with second-order nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. A89, 031803 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    Xu and Y

    X.-W. Xu and Y . Li, Strong photon antibunching of symmet- ric and antisymmetric modes in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A90, 033809 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    Lemonde, N

    M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, and A. A. Clerk, Antibunching and unconventional photon blockade with gaussian squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A90, 063824 (2014)

    2014

  50. [50]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V . Savona, Single photons from dissipation in coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. A94, 013815 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V . Savona, Unconventional photon blockade, Phys. Rev. A96, 053810 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    H. J. Snijders, J. A. Frey, J. Norman, H. Flayac, V . Savona, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers, M. P. van Exter, D. Bouwmeester, and W. Löffler, Observation of the unconventional photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 043601 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    Vaneph, A

    C. Vaneph, A. Morvan, G. Aiello, M. Féchant, M. Aprili, J. Gabelli, and J. Estève, Observation of the unconventional photon blockade in the microwave domain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 043602 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Naether, F

    U. Naether, F. Quijandría, J. J. García-Ripoll, and D. Zueco, Stationary discrete solitons in a driven dissipative bose-hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. A91, 033823 (2015)

    2015

  55. [55]

    Mandt, D

    S. Mandt, D. Sadri, A. A. Houck, and H. E. Türeci, Stochas- tic differential equations for quantum dynamics of spin-boson networks, New Journal of Physics17, 053018 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    G. R. Dennis, J. J. Hope, and M. T. Johnsson, Xmds2: Fast, scalable simulation of coupled stochastic partial differ- ential equations, Computer Physics Communications184, 201 (2013)

    2013

  57. [57]

    Deuar, Multi-time correlations in the positive-P, Q, and dou- bled phase-space representations, Quantum5, 455 (2021)

    P. Deuar, Multi-time correlations in the positive-P, Q, and dou- bled phase-space representations, Quantum5, 455 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Y . Wang, X. Zheng, T. C. H. Liew, and Y . D. Chong, Long-lived photon blockade with weak optical nonlinearity, arXiv (2025), preprint, ArXiv:2502.09930

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025