pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02248 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Evaluating the Prospects of Cyclic Deconvolution across 312 Pulsars

Jacob E. Turner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords cyclic deconvolutionmillisecond pulsarsradio telescopesuGMRTLOFARcyclic figure of meritlow-frequency observationspulsar instrumentation
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

uGMRT ranks as the best current instrument for cyclic deconvolution of most millisecond pulsars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the cyclic figure of merit to 312 pulsars with spin periods below 40 ms to evaluate the chances of successful cyclic deconvolution at 15 telescope-frequency combinations. It identifies the 80-300 MHz band as the range where most pulsars reach sufficient merit, which favors low-frequency facilities. Among ten telescopes, uGMRT yields the largest number of viable sources today, LOFAR places second, and the DSA is projected to lead once more galactic millisecond pulsars are known. The same metric also flags the Crab Pulsar as promising at several sites, hinting that some non-recycled pulsars could work as well.

Core claim

By computing the cyclic figure of merit from pulsar spin period, flux, and telescope parameters, the study finds that the frequency window of roughly 80-300 MHz maximizes the number of sources that can undergo cyclic deconvolution, placing uGMRT first among current instruments, LOFAR second, and the DSA first in a future with more discovered millisecond pulsars.

What carries the argument

The cyclic figure of merit, a quantity that combines assumed pulsar spin period and flux density with telescope sensitivity, bandwidth, and frequency to forecast the likelihood of cyclic deconvolution success.

If this is right

  • Frequencies between 80 and 300 MHz give the highest number of pulsars with sufficient cyclic merit.
  • uGMRT currently observes the largest set of sources inside the full deconvolution regime.
  • LOFAR ranks second among existing telescopes by the same count.
  • The DSA is expected to overtake other instruments once a larger fraction of galactic millisecond pulsars are discovered.
  • The Crab Pulsar reaches high enough merit at several low-frequency sites that some faster canonical pulsars may also permit cyclic deconvolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Near-real-time cyclic spectroscopy backends at low-frequency telescopes would make the technique available to a wider user community.
  • Observing-time proposals for pulsar studies could use cyclic-merit rankings to select targets that maximize the chance of new scientific results.
  • Future large-scale pulsar surveys at low frequencies might incorporate cyclic-deconvolution potential as a secondary science driver.
  • Similar figure-of-merit calculations could rank telescopes for other advanced radio techniques such as baseband recording or coherent dedispersion.

Load-bearing premise

The cyclic figure of merit computed from assumed pulsar properties and telescope parameters accurately forecasts real-world success of cyclic deconvolution without significant unmodeled propagation or instrumental effects.

What would settle it

Attempting cyclic deconvolution on the highest-merit sources at uGMRT and comparing the fraction that actually succeed against the fraction predicted by the model would directly test the forecasting accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02248 by Jacob E. Turner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Histograms showing the lower (blue) and upper (orange) boundaries to the full deconvolution regime for all pulsars in our survey. The lower frequency boundary has more instances due to the upper frequency boundary requiring W10 meausrements, which were not available for all pulsars. While a pulsar’s cyclic merit will vary based on telescope and observing frequency, its upper and lower frequency boundaries … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for GBT at 350 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolution regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the op￾timistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds may do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for DSA-2000 at 800 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram.… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for FAST at 550 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolution regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the op￾timistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as vi￾sualized by histogram. Si… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for MWA at 200 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolution regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the op￾timistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as vi￾sualized by histogram. Sim… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for LOFAR at 200 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. Si… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for NenuFAR at 85 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for uGMRT at 150 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. S… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for uGMRT at 200 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. S… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Cyclic merits for all sources analyzed for uGMRT at 350 MHz (blue), and the subset of sources in the full deconvolu￾tion regime (orange). The dashed and solid red lines indicate the optimistic and conservative cyclic merit thresholds, respectively. Note that some sources passing certain cyclic merit thresholds do so within error, and thus may not appear to meet those criteria as visualized by histogram. S… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We use the cyclic figure of merit to determine the likelihood of achieving cyclic deconvolution for 312 pulsars with sub-40 ms spin periods across 15 different telescope-observing frequency combinations. We find that the optimal frequency range for achieving cyclic deconvolution for most pulsars is between $\sim$80$-$300 MHz, making low frequency observatories such as uGMRT, LOFAR, and MWA the best-suited instruments for the technique. Moreover, we find that, as quantified by the total number sources with sufficient cyclic merits that are observed within the full deconvolution regime, uGMRT is likely the best current instrument for cyclic spectroscopy among the ten telescopes we considered, with LOFAR being the second best, although our simulations predict that the DSA may become the top instrument once a greater fraction of galactic millisecond pulsars are discovered. The relatively high cyclic merit of the Crab Pulsar in the frequency ranges considered for GBT, MWA, LOFAR, and uGMRT suggests that some faster-spinning canonical pulsars may be able to achieve cyclic deconvolution, and we discuss potential follow-up analyses on other non-recycled pulsars. We conclude by advocating for near real-time cyclic spectroscopy backends to be considered for current and upcoming low frequency telescopes to increase the accessibility of this technique.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates prospects for cyclic deconvolution of 312 pulsars with spin periods below 40 ms by applying a cyclic figure of merit across 15 telescope-frequency combinations. It identifies the 80-300 MHz band as optimal, ranks uGMRT highest among current instruments (with LOFAR second), predicts DSA may lead once more galactic millisecond pulsars are known, notes the Crab Pulsar's relatively high merit as evidence that some canonical pulsars could succeed, and recommends near real-time cyclic spectroscopy backends for low-frequency facilities.

Significance. If the cyclic figure of merit reliably forecasts practical success, the work supplies a quantitative basis for allocating observing time and prioritizing backend development for cyclic spectroscopy. The frequency-range and instrument rankings could directly inform near-term observational programs and future low-frequency array design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (instrument ranking and Table of source counts)] The central ranking (uGMRT first among current telescopes, DSA potentially first in the future) rests on counting how many of the 312 pulsars exceed the cyclic-merit threshold inside the full deconvolution regime. No cross-check is performed against the small set of pulsars for which cyclic deconvolution has already been demonstrated; unmodeled propagation or instrumental effects could therefore move sources below the practical threshold even when the metric is high. This directly affects the reliability of the headline instrument ordering.
  2. [Methods and Results sections (figure-of-merit definition and source-count tables)] No error bars, Monte-Carlo sensitivity tests, or propagation of uncertainties are shown for the cyclic figure of merit when pulsar parameters (period, DM, flux) or telescope specifications (bandwidth, sensitivity, frequency) are varied within plausible ranges. Because the final source counts and relative rankings are derived from these inputs, the absence of such tests leaves the robustness of the conclusions unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'ten telescopes' while the body refers to '15 different telescope-observing frequency combinations'; a brief clarification of the exact set of instruments and bands would remove ambiguity.
  2. [Discussion] The discussion of potential follow-up on non-recycled pulsars (including the Crab) would be strengthened by naming one or two additional specific targets and the frequency bands at which they should be observed first.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential significance of our work in guiding observations and instrument development for cyclic spectroscopy. We address each major comment below in detail, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section (instrument ranking and Table of source counts)] The central ranking (uGMRT first among current telescopes, DSA potentially first in the future) rests on counting how many of the 312 pulsars exceed the cyclic-merit threshold inside the full deconvolution regime. No cross-check is performed against the small set of pulsars for which cyclic deconvolution has already been demonstrated; unmodeled propagation or instrumental effects could therefore move sources below the practical threshold even when the metric is high. This directly affects the reliability of the headline instrument ordering.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of cross-validation against the limited existing demonstrations of cyclic deconvolution. Our cyclic figure of merit is derived directly from the theoretical requirements for resolving cyclic spectra (as detailed in the Methods), and we already highlight the Crab Pulsar as an example of a canonical pulsar with relatively high merit across several instruments. However, the small number of demonstrated cases and differences in their scattering, DM, and flux properties limit direct statistical comparison. We agree this is a limitation for interpreting absolute success rates. In revision we will expand the discussion in the Results section to explicitly address potential unmodeled effects and their possible impact on the reported rankings, while retaining the relative ordering as a guide based on the available parameters. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods and Results sections (figure-of-merit definition and source-count tables)] No error bars, Monte-Carlo sensitivity tests, or propagation of uncertainties are shown for the cyclic figure of merit when pulsar parameters (period, DM, flux) or telescope specifications (bandwidth, sensitivity, frequency) are varied within plausible ranges. Because the final source counts and relative rankings are derived from these inputs, the absence of such tests leaves the robustness of the conclusions unquantified.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the lack of uncertainty quantification leaves the robustness of the source counts and rankings unquantified. The figure of merit depends on inputs with known uncertainties (pulsar period, DM, flux) and telescope parameters that can vary. We will add a new sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript, using Monte Carlo sampling to vary these parameters within plausible ranges and report the resulting variations in the number of sources exceeding the threshold and in the instrument rankings. This will be included as an appendix or supplementary figure to quantify stability without altering the main conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: cyclic figure of merit computed from external catalogs and specs

full rationale

The paper derives instrument rankings by counting how many of the 312 pulsars exceed a cyclic-merit threshold, where the merit is computed directly from external pulsar properties (period, DM, flux from catalogs) and telescope parameters (bandwidth, sensitivity, frequency). No equation reduces the merit or the count to a fitted parameter defined by the same data, nor does any self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling make the result tautological by construction. The approach is forward modeling against independent inputs, so the central claim remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The evaluation rests on the validity of the cyclic figure of merit as a predictor and on the accuracy of the input pulsar spin periods, dispersion measures, and telescope sensitivity models drawn from external catalogs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The cyclic figure of merit is a reliable proxy for the probability of successful cyclic deconvolution
    Used directly to rank likelihoods for each pulsar-telescope pair.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1190 out tokens · 37279 ms · 2026-05-17T01:57:58.933001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2019

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION field.or.null duplicate empty pop "" 'skip if FUNCTION format.annotation annotation empty "" " quotation " annotation * " quotation " * if FUNCTION fin.entry note output write newline format.annotation write INTEGERS n...

    work page

  5. [5]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...

    work page

  6. [6]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "]" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty pages empty not booktitle empty not or or "" archive empty " http://arxiv.org/abs/" eprint * " " * " " * format.archive * ep...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Agazie et al

    Agazie, G., Alam, M. F., Anumarlapudi, A., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 951, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda9a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acda9a 2023

  9. [9]

    F., Arzoumanian , Z., Baker , P

    Alam , M. F., Arzoumanian , Z., Baker , P. T., et al. 2021, , 252, 4, 10.3847/1538-4365/abc6a0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abc6a0 2021

  10. [10]

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  11. [11]

    Bhat , N. D. R., Swainston , N. A., McSweeney , S. J., et al. 2023, , 40, e020, 10.1017/pasa.2023.18

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2023.18 2023

  12. [12]

    V., Pennucci, T

    Bilous, A. V., Pennucci, T. T., Demorest, P., & Ransom, S. M. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 803, 83, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/803/2/83 2015

  13. [13]

    M., Theureau , G., et al

    Bondonneau , L., Grie meier , J. M., Theureau , G., et al. 2020, , 635, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936829

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936829 2020

  14. [14]

    2021, , 652, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039339

    ---. 2021, , 652, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039339

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039339 2021

  15. [15]

    F., Macquart, J.-P., Gao, J

    Brisken, W. F., Macquart, J.-P., Gao, J. J., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 708, 232, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/232

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/232 2010

  16. [16]

    D., et al

    Burgay , M., Bailes , M., Bates , S. D., et al. 2013, , 433, 259, 10.1093/mnras/stt721

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt721 2013

  17. [17]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, NE2001.I. A New Model for the Galactic Distribution of Free Electrons and its Fluctuations

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    M., & Rickett, B

    Cordes, J. M., & Rickett, B. J. 1998, ApJ, 507, 846, 10.1086/306358

    work page doi:10.1086/306358 1998

  19. [19]

    H., McPhee , C

    Crowter , K., Stairs , I. H., McPhee , C. A., et al. 2020, , 495, 3052, 10.1093/mnras/staa933

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa933 2020

  20. [20]

    N., et al

    Dai , S., Hobbs , G., Manchester , R. N., et al. 2015, , 449, 3223, 10.1093/mnras/stv508

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv508 2015

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    de Oliveira-Costa , A., Tegmark , M., Gaensler , B. M., et al. 2008, , 388, 247, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13376.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13376.x 2008

  22. [22]

    Demorest, P. B. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2821, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19230.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19230.x 2011

  23. [23]

    B., Ferdman , R

    Demorest , P. B., Ferdman , R. D., Gonzalez , M. E., et al. 2013, , 762, 94, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/94 2013

  24. [24]

    S., McLaughlin , M., Olszanski , T

    Deneva , J. S., McLaughlin , M., Olszanski , T. E. E., et al. 2024, , 271, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad19da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad19da 2024

  25. [25]

    R., Jones, G., et al

    Dolch, T., Stinebring, D. R., Jones, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/abf48b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf48b 2021

  26. [26]

    M., Basuroski, A., Halley, K., et al

    Doskoch, G. M., Basuroski, A., Halley, K., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 973, 87, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6304

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6304 2024

  27. [27]

    B., Schinzel , F

    Dowell , J., Taylor , G. B., Schinzel , F. K., Kassim , N. E., & Stovall , K. 2017, , 469, 4537, 10.1093/mnras/stx1136

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1136 2017

  28. [28]

    A., Jagannathan , P., Mooley , K

    Frail , D. A., Jagannathan , P., Mooley , K. P., & Intema , H. T. 2016, , 829, 119, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/119

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/119 2016

  29. [29]

    Freire , P. C. C., Ransom , S. M., & Gupta , Y. 2007, , 662, 1177, 10.1086/517904

    work page doi:10.1086/517904 2007

  30. [30]

    A., McLaughlin , M

    Gentile , P. A., McLaughlin , M. A., Demorest , P. B., et al. 2018, , 862, 47, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac9c9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac9c9 2018

  31. [31]

    M., et al

    Gitika , P., Bailes , M., Shannon , R. M., et al. 2023, , 526, 3370, 10.1093/mnras/stad2841

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2841 2023

  32. [32]

    2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 159, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/10/159

    Han , J., Wang , C., Xu , J., & Han , J.-L. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 159, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/10/159

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/16/10/159 2016

  33. [33]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, CSE, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  34. [34]

    A., Bailes, M., Ord, S

    Jacoby, B. A., Bailes, M., Ord, S. M., Knight, H. S., & Hotan, A. W. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 656, 408, 10.1086/509312

    work page doi:10.1086/509312 2007

  35. [35]

    F., et al

    Jankowski , F., van Straten , W., Keane , E. F., et al. 2018, , 473, 4436, 10.1093/mnras/stx2476

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2476 2018

  36. [36]

    Kaur , D., Bhat , N. D. R., Tremblay , S. E., et al. 2019, , 882, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab338f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab338f 2019

  37. [37]

    J., Hobbs , G., et al

    Kerr , M., Reardon , D. J., Hobbs , G., et al. 2020, , 37, e020, 10.1017/pasa.2020.11

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.11 2020

  38. [38]

    I., Verbiest , J

    Kondratiev , V. I., Verbiest , J. P. W., Hessels , J. W. T., et al. 2016, , 585, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527178

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527178 2016

  39. [39]

    Kuniyoshi , M., Verbiest , J. P. W., Lee , K. J., et al. 2015, , 453, 828, 10.1093/mnras/stv1604

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1604 2015

  40. [40]

    D., & Losovsky , B

    Kuzmin , A. D., & Losovsky , B. Y. 1999, , 352, 489

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    2001, , 368, 230, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000507

    ---. 2001, , 368, 230, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000507

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000507 2001

  42. [42]

    A., Jones, G., et al

    Levin, L., McLaughlin, M. A., Jones, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 166. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/818/i=2/a=166

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    2004, , 600, 905, 10.1086/379923

    Lewandowski , W., Wolszczan , A., Feiler , G., Konacki , M., & So tysi \'n ski , T. 2004, , 600, 905, 10.1086/379923

    work page doi:10.1086/379923 2004

  44. [44]

    2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115016, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac9577

    Liu, H.-F., Jiang, P., He, C., et al. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115016, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac9577

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac9577 2022

  45. [45]

    Liu , Y., Verbiest , J. P. W., Main , R. A., et al. 2022, , 664, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142552

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142552 2022

  46. [46]

    R., & Kramer , M

    Lorimer , D. R., & Kramer , M. 2004, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy , Vol. 4

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    R., Yates , J

    Lorimer , D. R., Yates , J. A., Lyne , A. G., & Gould , D. M. 1995, , 273, 411, 10.1093/mnras/273.2.411

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/273.2.411 1995

  48. [48]

    G., & Graham-Smith , F

    Lyne , A. G., & Graham-Smith , F. 1990, Pulsar astronomy

    work page 1990

  49. [49]

    F., Mayet, F., Aumont, J., & Désert, F.-X

    Macías-Pérez, J. F., Mayet, F., Aumont, J., & Désert, F.-X. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 711, 417, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/417

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/711/1/417 2010

  50. [50]

    A., Antoniadis, J., Chen, S., et al

    Main, R. A., Antoniadis, J., Chen, S., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 1079, 10.1093/mnras/stad1980

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1980 2023

  51. [51]

    M., Malov , O

    Malofeev , V. M., Malov , O. I., & Shchegoleva , N. V. 2000, Astronomy Reports, 44, 436, 10.1134/1.163868

    work page doi:10.1134/1.163868 2000

  52. [52]

    The ATNF Pulsar Catalogue

    Manchester , R. N., Hobbs , G. B., Teoh , A., & Hobbs , M. 2005, , 129, 1993, 10.1086/428488

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/428488 2005

  53. [53]

    N., Lyne , A

    Manchester , R. N., Lyne , A. G., D'Amico , N., et al. 1996, , 279, 1235, 10.1093/mnras/279.4.1235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/279.4.1235 1996

  54. [54]

    N., Hobbs , G., Bailes , M., et al

    Manchester , R. N., Hobbs , G., Bailes , M., et al. 2013, , 30, e017, 10.1017/pasa.2012.017

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2012.017 2013

  55. [55]

    2000, , 147, 195, 10.1051/aas:2000298

    Maron , O., Kijak , J., Kramer , M., & Wielebinski , R. 2000, , 147, 195, 10.1051/aas:2000298

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000298 2000

  56. [56]

    E., Spiewak , R., Swiggum , J

    McEwen , A. E., Spiewak , R., Swiggum , J. K., et al. 2020, , 892, 76, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab75e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab75e2 2020

  57. [57]

    W., Stappers , B

    McKee , J. W., Stappers , B. W., Bassa , C. G., et al. 2019, , 483, 4784, 10.1093/mnras/sty3058

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3058 2019

  58. [58]

    T., Shannon, R

    Miles, M. T., Shannon, R. M., Bailes, M., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 519, 3976, 10.1093/mnras/stac3644

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3644 2022

  59. [59]

    L., Bell , M

    Murphy , T., Kaplan , D. L., Bell , M. E., et al. 2017, , 34, e020, 10.1017/pasa.2017.13

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.13 2017

  60. [60]

    K., & Cordes, J

    Ocker, S. K., & Cordes, J. M. 2024, Research Notes of the AAS, 8, 17, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad1bf1

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad1bf1 2024

  61. [61]

    2018, Journal of Open Source Software , 3, 538, 10.21105/joss.00538

    Pitkin , M. 2018, Journal of Open Source Software , 3, 538, 10.21105/joss.00538

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00538 2018

  62. [62]

    Price , D. C. 2016, PyGDSM: Python interface to Global Diffuse Sky Models , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1603.013

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 959508, 10.1007/s11433-018-9354-y

    Qian , L., Pan , Z., Li , D., et al. 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 959508, 10.1007/s11433-018-9354-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9354-y 2019

  64. [64]

    J., Bigot-Sazy , M

    Remazeilles , M., Dickinson , C., Banday , A. J., Bigot-Sazy , M. A., & Ghosh , T. 2015, , 451, 4311, 10.1093/mnras/stv1274

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1274 2015

  65. [65]

    G., et al

    Sanidas , S., Cooper , S., Bassa , C. G., et al. 2019, , 626, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935609

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935609 2019

  66. [66]

    A., Popov , M

    Soglasnov , V. A., Popov , M. V., Bartel , N., et al. 2004, , 616, 439, 10.1086/424908

    work page doi:10.1086/424908 2004

  67. [67]

    T., et al

    Spiewak , R., Bailes , M., Miles , M. T., et al. 2022, , 39, e027, 10.1017/pasa.2022.19

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.19 2022

  68. [68]

    H., Thorsett , S

    Stairs , I. H., Thorsett , S. E., & Camilo , F. 1999, , 123, 627, 10.1086/313245

    work page doi:10.1086/313245 1999

  69. [69]

    W., Karappusamy , R., & Hessels , J

    Stappers , B. W., Karappusamy , R., & Hessels , J. W. T. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 983, 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More, ed. C. Bassa , Z. Wang , A. Cumming , & V. M. Kaspi (AIP), 593--597, 10.1063/1.2900304

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2900304 2008

  70. [70]

    R., McLaughlin , M

    Stinebring , D. R., McLaughlin , M. A., Cordes , J. M., et al. 2001, , 549, L97, 10.1086/319133

    work page doi:10.1086/319133 2001

  71. [71]

    S., Ransom , S

    Stovall , K., Lynch , R. S., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2014, , 791, 67, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/67

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/1/67 2014

  72. [72]

    A., Lee , C

    Swainston , N. A., Lee , C. P., McSweeney , S. J., & Bhat , N. D. R. 2022, , 39, e056, 10.1017/pasa.2022.52

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.52 2022

  73. [73]

    K., Kaplan, D

    Swiggum, J. K., Kaplan, D. L., McLaughlin, M. A., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8994

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8994 2017

  74. [74]

    N., & Sandhu , J

    Toscano , M., Bailes , M., Manchester , R. N., & Sandhu , J. S. 1998, , 506, 863, 10.1086/306282

    work page doi:10.1086/306282 1998

  75. [75]

    E., Dolch, T., Demorest, P

    Turner, J. E., Dolch, T., Demorest, P. B., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 989, 228, 10.3847/1538-4357/adec73

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adec73 2025

  76. [76]

    E., Stinebring , D

    Turner , J. E., Stinebring , D. R., McLaughlin , M. A., et al. 2023, , 944, 191, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb6fd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb6fd 2023

  77. [77]

    E., McLaughlin , M

    Turner , J. E., McLaughlin , M. A., Cordes , J. M., et al. 2021, , 917, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfafe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfafe 2021

  78. [78]

    E., Dolch, T., Cordes, J

    Turner, J. E., Dolch, T., Cordes, J. M., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 972, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5af9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5af9 2024

  79. [79]

    C., & Varoquaux , G

    van der Walt , S., Colbert , S. C., & Varoquaux , G. 2011, CSE, 13, 22

    work page 2011

  80. [81]

    A., Demorest , P

    Walker , M. A., Demorest , P. B., & van Straten , W. 2013, , 779, 99, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/99

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/99 2013

Showing first 80 references.