Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Modeling Compressive Instability in Two-Dimensional Ti2COx MXenes

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Classical plate theory overstates buckling of Ti2C MXene sheets

desk verdict Useful qualitative MD catalog of MXene buckling, but the headline claim against classical continuum theory rests on one uncontrolled FEM comparison and the two abstracts contradict each other. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.05166 v2 pith:7MMG2QFB submitted 2025-12-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.atom-phphysics.comp-ph

Hossein Darban This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atom-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords MXenebucklingmoleculardynamicscompressiveinstabilitysurfaceterminationTi2Cpost-bucklingnanosheet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses reactive molecular dynamics to watch how single-layer Ti2C and Ti2CO2 MXene nanosheets buckle under compression, shear, and biaxial load. It claims that classical plate theory, applied to a 7×7 nm sheet, predicts a critical buckling strain of 0.0036, while the atomistic simulations buckle at about 0.0015 along the armchair direction — so continuum theory significantly overestimates stability. The paper maps how defects, lateral confinement, and oxygen termination change buckling stress and mode shape, and shows that bent sheets develop opposite stress states in their top and bottom titanium layers. If the claim is right, design of MXene-based composites and flexible devices needs atomistic or nonlocal models rather than textbook plate equations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the first buckling mode of a 7×7 nm Ti2C nanosheet loaded by displacing edge atoms, analyzed through reactive molecular dynamics. The argument hinges on the critical stress and strain extracted at 1 K and on the comparison to a finite-element isotropic plate model of the same in-plane size with a thickness of 0.231 nm, clamped along loaded edges and free along unloaded edges. The bond-length analysis of the top and bottom Ti layers in the bent sheet provides the atomistic mechanism: curvature induces tensile strain in one Ti layer and compression in the other.

What would settle it

Run a finite-element buckling eigenvalue calculation for a 7×7 nm orthotropic plate with E_armchair=655 GPa and E_zigzag=590 GPa, displacement-controlled edge loading, and the same relaxed geometry; if the predicted critical strain falls to about 0.0015, the paper's central claim is contradicted. Alternatively, suspend a single-layer Ti2C sheet and measure its critical compressive strain experimentally; a measured value near the plate prediction would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a 7×7 nm Ti2C MXene monolayer buckles under uniaxial compression at a strain of about 0.0015 (armchair) and 0.0006 (zigzag) in reactive MD, whereas an isotropic elastic plate of thickness 0.231 nm with clamped loaded edges and free unloaded edges buckles at 0.0036. The paper presents this gap as evidence that classical continuum mechanics significantly overestimates the buckling strain of MXenes, and concludes that nonclassical, size-dependent continuum theories or direct atomistic simulations are needed for stability predictions. It also reports that oxygen termination raises buckling stress from about 1 GPa to 3.5 GPa, that lateral confinement roughly doubles

Load-bearing premise

The claim that classical continuum theory overestimates buckling strains rests on equating an isotropic 0.231 nm-thick plate with clamped/free edges to an atomistic sheet that is anisotropic, is three atoms thick, and is loaded by displacing edge atoms; if those boundary and thickness choices are not equivalent, the gap between 0.0036 and 0.0015 is not evidence against continuum theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the overestimation is real, thin-plate buckling predictions for MXene devices must be replaced by nonlocal or atomistic treatments for in-plane dimensions of a few nanometers.
  • Lateral confinement from polymer shrinkage should delay MXene buckling by up to a factor of two, which matters for MXene-polymer composite fabrication.
  • Oxygen termination not only raises the buckling stress to about 3.5 GPa but also reduces armchair/zigzag anisotropy, so termination can be used to tailor compressive stability.
  • Vacancy defects lower the critical load but leave the global mode unchanged, meaning defect tolerance is higher under compression than under tension.
  • Large compressive strains beyond 0.35 are survivable for Ti2C but cause fracture of Ti2CO2, setting a limit for applications that demand extreme folding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An immediate testable extension would be a continuum buckling calculation using the actual anisotropic stiffness (655 vs 590 GPa) and the displacement-controlled boundary conditions; if that also overpredicts, the size-dependence claim is strengthened, and if it matches MD, the current conclusion reduces to a boundary-condition artifact.
  • The paper's 0.231 nm thickness used in the FEM is less than the physical Ti2C layer thickness; reinterpreting thickness as a fit parameter could collapse the reported gap, so the comparison should be reported as thickness-sensitive.
  • The opposite stress states in the top and bottom Ti layers suggest that MXene scrolling and nanotube formation begin at buckling, implying that compressive loading is a plausible production route for rolled MXene morphologies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports reactive molecular dynamics (ReaxFF) simulations of the compressive and post-buckling behavior of 7×7 nm² Ti2C and Ti2CO2 MXene nanosheets under uniaxial, biaxial, and shear loading. It examines the effects of strain rate, vacancy defects, lateral confinement pressure, and oxygen surface termination. The central quantitative claim, made in Section 3.1 and the Conclusions, is that classical continuum mechanics significantly overestimates buckling strains, based on a single isotropic FEM plate model (buckling strain 0.0036) compared to MD (buckling strain 0.0015 for armchair loading). Additional findings include directional anisotropy in buckling resistance, defect-induced reduction of buckling stress without global mode change, confinement-induced stabilization, oxygen-termination-induced strengthening, and distinct biaxial and shear buckling morphologies.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would make a valuable contribution by alerting the MXene community to the inadequacy of classical plate models for stability predictions and motivating nonlocal or atomistic treatments. The study is useful in scope: it covers a broad set of loading conditions and material modifications using a well-established ReaxFF parameterization [31] and compares Young's moduli with DFT data [19]. However, the principal quantitative comparison is not controlled, and the two versions of the abstract contradict each other on the sign of the discrepancy. These issues are load-bearing and preclude acceptance in the present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / §3.1] The arXiv abstract states that 'classical continuum mechanics underestimates the buckling strains,' while the full-text abstract and Section 3.1 state that it 'significantly overestimates' them. The sign of the central result is internally inconsistent. This must be reconciled; it is not a mere wording issue.
  2. [§3.1] The FEM benchmark is not a controlled comparison. The MD sheet is anisotropic (E_armchair=655 GPa, E_zigzag=590 GPa), while the FEM is an isotropic plate with thickness 0.231 nm, clamped loaded edges, and free unloaded edges. The MD loading is applied by displacing 'a few layers of atoms' at the edge, and the rotational restraint of that atomistic boundary is not characterized. Plate buckling strain is highly sensitive to edge clamping and to the assumed plate thickness. Without an anisotropic FEM with demonstrably equivalent boundary conditions and a justified effective thickness, the comparison (0.0036 vs 0.0015) cannot support the claim that classical continuum mechanics overestimates buckling strain.
  3. [Abstract / whole manuscript] The arXiv abstract promises a 'nonlocal formulation' that 'adequately captures the observed response,' but the full text contains no nonlocal continuum formulation or benchmark. The central conclusion is framed as classical vs nonlocal behavior, yet only a local isotropic FEM is presented. Either add the nonlocal comparison or correct the abstract and the framing of the conclusion.
  4. [§3.1 / §3.2] The strain-rate convergence is asserted without quantification: the two lowest rates are said to give 'nearly identical' buckling stress, but no error bars or repeat simulations are reported. The zigzag critical strain of 0.0006 is acknowledged to be affected by residual stresses, and §3.2 states that defects lower buckling stress but have 'no significant influence on the buckling strain.' These statements need quantitative support or qualification, especially because the central comparison uses only a single armchair value.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title / header] The arXiv title is 'Modeling Compressive Instability in Two-Dimensional Ti2COx MXenes' while the full-text title is 'Mechanical Stability of 2D Ti2COx MXenes Under Compression Using Reactive Molecular Dynamics.' Please use one consistent title.
  2. [§3.4] The section title says 'O2 surface termination' but the text and chemical formula refer to –O termination. Please make the terminology consistent.
  3. [§2] The wall interaction potential is written as a 9–3 Lennard-Jones form but is not numbered. Please number equations consistently and confirm the units of ε and σ.
  4. [§3.2] Figure 5 is difficult to read because multiple defect percentages are plotted in grayscale with no markers. Consider discrete markers or separate panels.
  5. [References] In §2 the force field is attributed only to [31], while [30] is also a ReaxFF parameterization discussed in the Introduction. Please specify exactly which parameter set is used.
  6. [§3.4] The Young's moduli for Ti2CO2 (≈480 GPa) are compared with DFT values of 540 GPa (armchair) and 593 GPa (zigzag) from [19], but the discrepancy is not discussed. If these values feed into any continuum benchmark, a comment is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: MD buckling results are independent simulation outputs; the FEM benchmark is an external comparison, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: (1) MD trajectories use the ReaxFF force field from [31] and initial configurations from [41]; no parameter in this paper is fitted to the buckling outputs. (2) Buckling stresses and strains in Secs. 3.1–3.6 are read directly from simulated stress–strain curves, not imposed by the model inputs. (3) The FEM benchmark in Sec. 3.1 is a single classical plate model with explicitly stated dimensions, thickness, and clamped/free boundary conditions; it is an external comparison, and the MD values are not used to calibrate its parameters. (4) The Young's-modulus comparison with DFT [19] is independent external support. (5) The wall and spring parameters in Secs. 2 and 3.3 are selected or swept to study confinement effects, not tuned to reproduce the target buckling values. No 'prediction' reduces by construction to its input, so there is no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation circularity. I note two non-circular concerns: the abstract states that classical continuum mechanics 'underestimates' while the full text says it 'significantly overestimates,' and the abstract mentions a 'nonlocal formulation' that does not appear in the full text; additionally, the FEM comparison uses isotropic clamped-plate assumptions that may not match the MD edge conditions. These are correctness/reporting issues, not circularity, and therefore do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central results depend on the ReaxFF potential and on the single FEM comparison; the wall/spring parameters are tuning inputs, not fitted to the target buckling strains.

free parameters (3)
  • Equilibration wall potential parameters = ε=0.1 kcal/mol, σ=1.74749 Å
    Chosen to keep nanosheet flat during equilibration; not tied to physical substrate, may leave residual stress at onset of loading.
  • Confinement spring stiffness = varied; e.g., 0.001 (kcal/mol)/Å^2
    Swept parameter, arbitrary scale; not calibrated to a real polymer matrix.
  • Repulsive wall gap and cutoff = 1.6 Å gap, 1.5 Å cutoff
    Hand-picked to avoid excessive repulsion; affects pre-stress state.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption ReaxFF parameterization from ref [31] accurately models Ti2C/Ti2CO2 under compression
    Paper validates structural/elastic properties against DFT/experiment but not compressive buckling; all results inherit this assumption.
  • domain assumption A 7×7 nm^2 sheet at 1 K with non-periodic boundaries represents intrinsic MXene buckling
    Finite size and quasi-0K suppress long-wavelength modes and thermal fluctuations; buckling strains may scale with size.
  • domain assumption Strain rates in the range 1.45×10^6–5.7×10^8 s^-1 are quasi-static enough for qualitative conclusions
    Authors show convergence at lowest rates, but these rates still far exceed experimental loading rates.
  • domain assumption The isotropic FEM plate with clamped loaded edges and free unloaded edges is an appropriate classical continuum benchmark
    MD sheet is anisotropic, and boundary conditions in MD are not explicitly clamped; this equivalence is assumed without verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling Compressive Instability in Two-Dimensional Ti2COx MXenes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7MMG2QFB

@misc{pith2026251205166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling Compressive Instability in Two-Dimensional Ti2COx MXenes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7MMG2QFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.05166}
}
read the original abstract

In practical applications, MXenes are often subjected to a variety of loads, including compression. While their mechanical response under different loading conditions, such as tensile loading, has been extensively studied, their compressive instability remains largely unexplored. The compressive and post-buckling behavior of Ti2C and Ti2CO2 MXene nanosheets is studied using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and a nonlocal formulation. The employed interatomic potential is first validated against experimental and density functional theory (DFT) data for structural and mechanical properties. The results indicate that classical continuum mechanics underestimates the buckling strains, whereas the nonlocal formulation adequately captures the observed response. A systematic examination of various defect types up to a defect fraction of 3% reveals that while isolated point defects primarily reduce the critical buckling stress, vacancy clusters significantly alter the buckling mode shapes. Lateral confinement pressure and oxygen surface termination substantially increase the buckling stress. Atomistic analysis reveals opposite stress states in the top and bottom Ti layers due to curvature-induced strain gradients. Under biaxial compression, the nanosheet buckles in a dome-like shape, whereas shear loads produce elliptical deflection modes. The presented findings may stimulate future studies on MXene morphological transformations, such as the development of nanotube, nanoscroll, and folded architectures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    N.C. Osti, M. Naguib, A. Ostadhossein, Y. Xie, P.R.C. Kent, B. Dyatkin, G. Rother, W.T. Heller, A.C.T. van Duin, Y. Gogotsi, E. Mamontov, Effect of Metal Ion Intercalation on the Structure of MXene and Water Dynamics on its Internal Surfaces, ACS Appl. Ma ter. Interfaces 8 (2016) 8859 –8863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b01490

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.6b01490 2016

  2. [19]

    Z. Guo, J. Zhou, C. Si, Z. Sun, Flexible two -dimensional Ti n+1Cn (n = 1, 2 and 3) and their functionalized MXenes predicted by density functional theories, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 15348–15354. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP00775E

    work page doi:10.1039/c5cp00775e 2015

  3. [1]

    Naguib, M

    M. Naguib, M. Kurtoglu, V. Presser, J. Lu, J. Niu, M. Heon, L. Hultman, Y. Gogotsi, M.W. Barsoum, Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti 3AlC2, Advanced Materials 23 (2011) 4248–4253. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102306

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201102306 2011

  4. [2]

    Murali, J.K

    G. Murali, J.K. Reddy Modigunta, Y.H. Park, J. -H. Lee, J. Rawal, S.-Y. Lee, I. In, S.-J. Park, A Review on MXene Synthesis, Stability, and Photocatalytic Applications, ACS Nano 16 (2022) 13370 – 13429. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c04750

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c04750 2022

  5. [3]

    Murali, J

    G. Murali, J. Rawal, J.K.R. Modigunta, Y.H. Park, J.-H. Lee, S.-Y. Lee, S.-J. Park, I. In, A review on MXenes: new-generation 2D materials for supercapacitors, Sustainable Energy Fuels 5 (2021) 5672–

    2021

  6. [4]

    Zhang, Z

    Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Lan, P. Zhang, Prediction of Ti 3C2O2 MXene as an effective capturer of formaldehyde, Applied Surface Science 469 (2019) 770 –774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.018 2019

  7. [5]

    Z. Shi, S. Zhong, Z. Zhang, Y. Sui, J. Zhou, L. Wu, Atomic insights into monolayer MXene degradation and impacts for lithium -ion storage, Applied Surface Science 689 (2025) 162506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162506

    arXiv 2025

  8. [6]

    Hatam -Lee, A

    S.M. Hatam -Lee, A. Esfandiar, A. Rajabpour, Mechanical behaviors of titanium nitride and carbide MXenes: A molecular dynamics study, Applied Surface Science 566 (2021) 150633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150633

    arXiv 2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [7]

    VahidMohammadi, J

    A. VahidMohammadi, J. Rosen, Y. Gogotsi, The world of two-dimensional carbides and nitrides (MXenes), Science 372 (2021) eabf1581. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf1581

    2021 doi

  2. [8]

    X. Xu, T. Guo, M. Lanza, H.N. Alshareef, Status and prospects of MXene-based nanoelectronic devices, Matter 6 (2023) 800–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2023.01.019

    2023 doi

  3. [9]

    Cao, Beyond graphene and boron nitride: why MXene can be used in composite for corrosion protection on metals?, Composites Part B: Engineering 271 (2024) 111168

    H. Cao, Beyond graphene and boron nitride: why MXene can be used in composite for corrosion protection on metals?, Composites Part B: Engineering 271 (2024) 111168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111168

    2024

  4. [10]

    Huynh, H.Q

    T.T. Huynh, H.Q. Pham, Defect and non -metallic doping co -engineering in two -dimensional transition-metal carbide -based electrocatalysts for renewable energy conversion, Coordination Chemistry Reviews 549 (2026) 217254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217254

    2026

  5. [11]

    Y. Liu, D. Lv, Y. Yang, L. Zhu, R. Wang, S. Chen, D. Jiang, H. Wang, Multi -dimensional applications of MXene in human health: From disease prevention, diagnosis, to rehabilitation, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 246 (2026) 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.20...

    2026 doi

  6. [12]

    Y. Yao, X. Li, K.M. Sisican, R.M.C. Ramos, M. Judicpa, S. Qin, J. Zhang, J. Yao, J.M. Razal, K.A.S. Usman, Progress towards efficient MXene sensors, Commun Mater 6 (2025) 210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-025-00907-y

    2025 doi

  7. [13]

    I. Amin, H. van den Brekel, K. Nemani, E. Batyrev, A. de Vooys, H. van der Weijde, B. Anasori, N.R. Shiju, Ti3C2Tx MXene Polymer Composites for Anticorrosion: An Overview and Perspective, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 (2022) 43749–43758. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c11953

    2022 doi

  8. [14]

    Kabir, K

    L. Kabir, K. Wijaya, S. Sagadevan, J. Unruangsri, K. Ullah, W.-C. Oh, 2D MXene-polymer based composites for biomedical applications, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1031 (2025) 181068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.181068

    2025

  9. [15]

    Lipatov, H

    A. Lipatov, H. Lu, M. Alhabeb, B. Anasori, A. Gruverman, Y. Gogotsi, A. Sinitskii, Elastic properties of 2D Ti 3C2Tx MXene monolayers and bilayers, Science Advances 4 (2018) eaat0491. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat0491

    2018 doi

  10. [16]

    Suk, R.D

    J.W. Suk, R.D. Piner, J. An, R.S. Ruoff, Mechanical Properties of Monolayer Graphene Oxide, ACS Nano 4 (2010) 6557–6564. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101781v

    2010 doi

  11. [17]

    Gómez -Navarro, M

    C. Gómez -Navarro, M. Burghard, K. Kern, Elastic Properties of Chemically Derived Single Graphene Sheets, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 2045–2049. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl801384y

    2008 doi

  12. [18]

    C. Rong, T. Su, Z. Li, T. Chu, M. Zhu, Y. Yan, B. Zhang, F. -Z. Xuan, Elastic properties and tensile strength of 2D Ti 3C2Tx MXene monolayers, Nat Commun 15 (2024) 1566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45657-6. 20

    2024 doi

  13. [20]

    Gouveia, T.L.P

    J.D. Gouveia, T.L.P. Galvão, K. Iben Nassar, J.R.B. Gomes, First -principles and machine - learning approaches for interpreting and predicting the properties of MXenes, Npj 2D Mater Appl 9 (2025) 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-025-00529-5

    2025 doi

  14. [21]

    Chenoweth, A.C.T

    K. Chenoweth, A.C.T. van Duin, W.A. Goddard, ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation, J. Phys. Chem. A 112 (2008) 1040 –1053. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp709896w

    2008 doi

  15. [22]

    Yang, S.J

    Q. Yang, S.J. Eder, A. Martini, P.G. Grützmacher, Effect of surface termination on the balance between friction and failure of Ti 3C2Tx MXenes, Npj Mater Degrad 7 (2023) 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00326-9

    2023 doi

  16. [23]

    Greenfeld, S

    I. Greenfeld, S. Jiang, L. Yang, H.D. Wagner, Nonlinear elasticity degrades monolayer fracture toughness, Acta Materialia 286 (2025) 120727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120727

    2025

  17. [24]

    Plummer, B

    G. Plummer, B. Anasori, Y. Gogotsi, G.J. Tucker, Nanoindentation of monolayer Ti n+1CnTx MXenes via atomistic simulations: The role of composition and defects on strength, Computational Materials Science 157 (2019) 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.033

    2019 doi

  18. [25]

    Jhon, Y.T

    Y.I. Jhon, Y.T. Byun, J.H. Lee, Y.M. Jhon, Robust mechanical tunability of 2D transition metal carbides via surface termination engineering: Molecular dynamics simulation, Applied Surface Science 532 (2020) 147380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147380

    2020

  19. [26]

    C. Wei, C. Wu, Nonlinear fracture of two -dimensional transition metal carbides (MXenes), Engineering Fracture Mechanics 230 (2020) 106978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106978

    2020

  20. [27]

    H. Yu, K. Xu, Z. Zhang, X. Cao, J. Weng, J. Wu, Oxygen functionalization-induced crossover in the tensile properties of the thinnest 2D Ti2C MXene, J. Mater. Chem. C 9 (2021) 2416 –2425. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC04637J

    2021 doi

  21. [28]

    Nayir, Q

    N. Nayir, Q. Mao, T. Wang, M. Kowalik, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, S. Dwivedi, G. -U. Jeong, Y.K. Shin, A. van Duin, Modeling and simulations for 2D materials: a ReaxFF perspective, 2D Mater. 10 (2023) 032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/acd7fd

    2023 doi

  22. [29]

    Y. Chen, S. Tang, X. Yan, Manipulating the crack path through the surface functional groups of MXenes, Nanoscale 14 (2022) 14169–14177. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02235D

    2022 doi

  23. [30]

    Ganeshan, Y.K

    K. Ganeshan, Y.K. Shin, N.C. Osti, Y. Sun, K. Prenger, M. Naguib, M. Tyagi, E. Mamontov, D. Jiang, A.C.T. van Duin, Structure and Dynamics of Aqueous Electrolytes Confined in 2D-TiO2/Ti3C2T2 MXene Heterostructures, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 58378 –58389. https://do...

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Thomazini, A.F

    L.F.V. Thomazini, A.F. Fonseca, Structure and elastic properties of titanium MXenes: Evaluation of COMB3, REAXFF and MEAM force fields, Computational Materials Science 259 (2025) 114134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.114134. 21

    2025

  25. [33]

    Billah, M.S

    Md.M. Billah, M.S. Rabbi, K.A. Rahman, P. Acar, Temperature and strain rate dependent tensile properties of titanium carbide/nitride MXenes, Materials Chemistry and Physics 312 (2024) 128581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128581

    2024

  26. [34]

    Borysiuk, V.N

    V.N. Borysiuk, V.N. Mochalin, Y. Gogotsi, Molecular dynamic study of the mechanical properties of two -dimensional titanium carbides Tin+1Cn (MXenes), Nanotechnology 26 (2015) 265705. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/26/265705

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Y. Li, C. Wei, S. Huang, C. Wu, V.N. Mochalin, In-situ SEM compression of accordion -like multilayer MXenes, Extreme Mechanics Letters 41 (2020) 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.101054

    2020

  28. [36]

    Lourie, D.M

    O. Lourie, D.M. Cox, H.D. Wagner, Buckling and Collapse of Embedded Carbon Nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1638–1641. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1638

    1998 doi

  29. [37]

    Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short -Range Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117 (1995) 1–19

    S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short -Range Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117 (1995) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039

    1995

  30. [38]

    Gissinger, I

    J.R. Gissinger, I. Nikiforov, Y. Afshar, B. Waters, M. Choi, D.S. Karls, A. Stukowski, W. Im, H. Heinz, A. Kohlmeyer, E.B. Tadmor, Type Label Framework for Bonded Force Fields in LAMMPS, J. Phys. Chem. B 128 (2024) 3282–3297. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c08419

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Aktulga, J.C

    H.M. Aktulga, J.C. Fogarty, S.A. Pandit, A.Y. Grama, Parallel reactive molecular dynamics: Numerical methods and algorithmic techniques, Parallel Computing 38 (2012) 245 –259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2011.08.005

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO –the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling Simul

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO –the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2009) 015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965- 0393/18/1/015012

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    Khazaei, M

    M. Khazaei, M. Arai, T. Sasaki, C. -Y. Chung, N.S. Venkataramanan, M. Estili, Y. Sakka, Y. Kawazoe, Novel Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides, Advanced Functional Materials 23 (2013) 2185 –2192. https://doi.org/10.1002/a...

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    Swope, H.C

    W.C. Swope, H.C. Andersen, P.H. Berens, K.R. Wilson, A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: Applicatio n to small water clusters, The Journal of Chemical Physics 76 (19 82) 637 –649. https:...

    doi

  35. [5693]

    https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE00918D. 19

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.