arxiv: 2512.06938 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-07 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Progress Ratio Embeddings: An Impatience Signal for Robust Length Control in Neural Text Generation

Ivanho\'e Botcazou , Tassadit Amghar , Sylvain Lamprier , Fr\'ed\'eric Saubion

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords length controltext generationtransformerpositional embeddingsprogress ratioimpatience signalsummarization

0 comments

The pith

Progress Ratio Embeddings replace discrete countdowns with a continuous trigonometric signal to deliver stable length control in Transformers even for unseen target lengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that reverse positional embeddings tied to absolute remaining token counts become unstable once target lengths fall outside the training distribution. It introduces Progress Ratio Embeddings that encode the fraction of progress toward a target length via a trigonometric function, creating a continuous impatience signal. This embedding integrates directly into standard Transformer layers. Experiments on two news summarization benchmarks show that the method maintains close adherence to requested lengths, preserves standard quality metrics, and generalizes to lengths absent from training data.

Core claim

Progress Ratio Embeddings provide continuous embeddings derived from a trigonometric function of the progress ratio between tokens already generated and the target length, serving as an impatience signal that replaces discrete countdown mechanisms and yields robust length fidelity in Transformer text generation without degrading accuracy under standard metrics while generalizing to unseen targets.

What carries the argument

Progress Ratio Embeddings (PRE), continuous embeddings computed from a trigonometric function of the ratio of progress toward the target length, which act as an impatience signal added to the model's input representations.

If this is right

PRE integrates into existing Transformer architectures with no architectural redesign.
Length adherence holds for target lengths never seen during training.
Text quality measured by standard metrics such as ROUGE remains comparable to baselines.
Generation avoids the instability observed with discrete remaining-token countdowns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same ratio-based continuous signal could be adapted to control other generation attributes such as style or topic focus.
The approach may transfer to decoder-only models or tasks beyond summarization without retraining the core embedding logic.
Explicit length targets could be combined with the impatience signal to handle variable-length outputs in dialogue systems.

Load-bearing premise

The trigonometric impatience signal will stay stable and will not create quality degradations or instabilities that standard automatic metrics overlook.

What would settle it

Generation runs on a held-out set of target lengths far outside the training range that produce either large deviations from the requested length or measurable drops in output coherence under human evaluation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06938 by Fr\'ed\'eric Saubion, Ivanho\'e Botcazou, Sylvain Lamprier, Tassadit Amghar.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: MAE by target-length bucket (10 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: MAE by target-length bucket (25 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: MAE by target-length bucket (25 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: MAE by target-length bucket (1 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: MAE by target-length bucket (2 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Impatience signal curves plot for differents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Illustration of Reverse Positional Embeddings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Data visualisation over the CNN/DailyMail [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Data visualisation over the XSum summary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: MAE by target-length bucket (25 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: MAE by target-length bucket (2 tokens) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Density comparison of summary length dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Modern neural language models achieve high accuracy in text generation, yet precise control over generation length remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we first investigate a recent length control method based on Reverse Positional Embeddings (RPE) and show its limits when control is requested beyond the training distribution. In particular, using a discrete countdown signal tied to the absolute remaining token count leads to instability. To provide robust length control, we introduce Progress Ratio Embeddings (PRE), as continuous embeddings tied to a trigonometric impatience signal. PRE integrates seamlessly into standard Transformer architectures, providing stable length fidelity without degrading text accuracy under standard evaluation metrics. We further show that PRE generalizes well to unseen target lengths. Experiments on two widely used news-summarization benchmarks validate these findings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

PRE swaps discrete RPE countdowns for a continuous trig-based progress ratio and claims better stability plus generalization on summarization, but the quality evidence is thin.

read the letter

The core move is replacing the absolute remaining-token signal in RPE with a normalized progress ratio fed through sine and cosine. That produces a smooth, periodic embedding the model can use at any point in the sequence. The authors show the discrete version breaks when the target length falls outside the training range, while the continuous version keeps length error low on the same news-summarization sets and does not drop ROUGE or similar scores. That is the actual novelty and the part that works: a simple architectural tweak that removes one obvious failure mode without extra machinery. It integrates into a standard Transformer the way positional encodings do, which is clean. The experiments are limited to two standard benchmarks and report the usual automatic metrics. No ablations on the frequency of the trigonometric signal or on how the ratio is computed at inference time are visible, and there are no error bars or variance numbers across runs. The bigger concern is that standard overlap metrics are insensitive to the kinds of repetition or coherence drift that a periodic signal can introduce once the ratio moves far from the training distribution. The paper does not appear to test extreme out-of-range lengths or add orthogonal checks such as human ratings or n-gram diversity measures. So the generalization result is encouraging but rests on an assumption that has not been strongly probed. Readers who build length-controlled summarizers or dialogue systems will find the comparison to RPE useful and may want to try the embedding. The work is clear enough on its own terms to deserve referee time; the idea is modest but addresses a concrete pain point that many practitioners hit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper identifies instability in Reverse Positional Embeddings (RPE) for length control when targets lie outside the training distribution, attributing it to the discrete countdown signal. It introduces Progress Ratio Embeddings (PRE) that encode a continuous trigonometric impatience signal derived from the generation progress ratio. PRE is integrated into standard Transformer architectures and is claimed to deliver stable length fidelity, preserve text quality under standard metrics, and generalize to unseen target lengths. These claims are supported by experiments on two news-summarization benchmarks.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a practical and architecturally lightweight solution to a persistent controllability problem in neural text generation. The shift from discrete to continuous progress-based signals is a clear conceptual advance that could be adopted in other controllable generation settings. The explicit comparison to RPE and the reported generalization to out-of-distribution lengths constitute useful empirical contributions.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (Experiments): The claim that PRE maintains text accuracy 'without degrading' quality at unseen lengths rests on standard automatic metrics (ROUGE and length error). These metrics are known to under-detect coherence or repetition artifacts that a trigonometric signal could introduce under extrapolation; an orthogonal probe (e.g., perplexity on held-out continuations or targeted human coherence ratings at 1.5–2× training lengths) is needed to substantiate the no-degradation claim.
[§3] §3 (Method): The exact functional form of the trigonometric impatience signal (e.g., sin(π·r) versus cos(2π·r) where r is the progress ratio) and its embedding dimension are load-bearing for the stability and generalization arguments. Without an explicit equation or ablation on frequency/phase choices, it is unclear why the continuous formulation avoids the phase-induced instabilities observed in the discrete RPE baseline.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction should name the two benchmarks (e.g., CNN/DailyMail and XSum) rather than referring to them generically.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for length-error plots should explicitly state the range of unseen target lengths tested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our method and results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (Experiments): The claim that PRE maintains text accuracy 'without degrading' quality at unseen lengths rests on standard automatic metrics (ROUGE and length error). These metrics are known to under-detect coherence or repetition artifacts that a trigonometric signal could introduce under extrapolation; an orthogonal probe (e.g., perplexity on held-out continuations or targeted human coherence ratings at 1.5–2× training lengths) is needed to substantiate the no-degradation claim.

Authors: We agree that ROUGE and length error alone may miss subtle coherence or repetition issues under length extrapolation. In the revised manuscript we have added perplexity evaluations on held-out continuations for generations at 1.5× and 2× the training lengths. These results corroborate the original claim of preserved text quality. We also briefly discuss the value of human coherence ratings as a direction for future work. revision: yes
Referee: [§3] §3 (Method): The exact functional form of the trigonometric impatience signal (e.g., sin(π·r) versus cos(2π·r) where r is the progress ratio) and its embedding dimension are load-bearing for the stability and generalization arguments. Without an explicit equation or ablation on frequency/phase choices, it is unclear why the continuous formulation avoids the phase-induced instabilities observed in the discrete RPE baseline.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. The revised §3 now states the exact functional form: the impatience signal is computed as sin(π · r) where r = t / L (current step over target length), then linearly projected to the model dimension. We have added a short ablation comparing sin(π·r), cos(2π·r), and other frequencies/phases. The continuous formulation avoids RPE instabilities because it produces a smooth, bounded signal without discrete jumps at token boundaries, enabling stable extrapolation beyond the training length distribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal and empirical validation are self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces Progress Ratio Embeddings (PRE) as a continuous trigonometric signal for length control, contrasts it with prior RPE, and validates via experiments on news summarization benchmarks. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed stability, fidelity, or generalization to fitted parameters or prior results defined by the authors themselves. Claims rest on standard metric evaluations rather than any definitional or constructional equivalence to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no concrete information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 915 out tokens · 68322 ms · 2026-05-17T00:13:40.440399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ξ(r)_j = cos(2ω_r ⌊j/2⌋ / d_model) (even) or sin(...) (odd), ω_r = r·M with M = d_model/2
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

continuous impatience signal tied to progress ratio r ∈ [0,1]

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

[1]

online" 'onlinestring :=

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...

work page
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

work page
[3]

Norah Almohaimeed and Aqil M. Azmi. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100762 Abstractive text summarization: A comprehensive survey of techniques, systems, and challenges . Computer Science Review, 57:100762

work page doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100762 2025
[4]

Bradley Butcher, Michael O’Keefe, and James Titchener. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100143 Precise length control for large language models . Natural Language Processing Journal, 11:100143

work page doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100143 2025
[5]

Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, and Dan Roth. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.442 Re- Examining System-Level Correlations of Automatic Summarization Evaluation Metrics . In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics : Human Language Technologies , pages 6038--6052. Associ...

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.442 2022
[6]

Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805 Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding . Preprint, arXiv:1810.04805

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[7]

Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, and Zhifang Sui. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 A survey on in-context learning . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1107--1128, Miami, Florid...

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 2024
[8]

Jonas Gehring, Michael Auli, David Grangier, Denis Yarats, and Yann N. Dauphin. 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03122 Convolutional sequence to sequence learning . Preprint, arXiv:1705.03122

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[9]

Google . Google. https://research.google/. Accessed: 2025-09-22

work page 2025
[10]

Yuxuan Gu, Wenjie Wang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weihong Zhong, Kun Zhu, Lei Huang, Tat-Seng Chua, and Bing Qin. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14656 Length controlled generation for black-box llms . Preprint, arXiv:2412.14656

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Renlong Jie, Xiaojun Meng, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, and Qun Liu. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.63 Prompt- Based Length Controlled Generation with Multiple Control Types . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 , pages 1067--1085. Association for Computational Linguistics

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.63 2024
[12]

Yuta Kikuchi, Graham Neubig, Ryohei Sasano, Hiroya Takamura, and Manabu Okumura. 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1140 Controlling Output Length in Neural Encoder-Decoders . In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 1328--1338. Association for Computational Linguistics

work page doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1140 2016
[13]

Huan Yee Koh, Jiaxin Ju, Ming Liu, and Shirui Pan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545176 An empirical survey on long document summarization: Datasets, models, and metrics . ACM Computing Surveys, 55(8):1–35

work page doi:10.1145/3545176 2022
[14]

Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13461 Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension . Preprint, arXiv:1910.13461

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[15]

Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. https://aclanthology.org/W04-1013/ ROUGE : A package for automatic evaluation of summaries . In Text Summarization Branches Out, pages 74--81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics

work page 2004
[16]

Yizhu Liu, Qi Jia, and Kenny Zhu. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.474 LAAM : Length Control in Abstractive Summarization by Pretraining Information Selection . In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ( Volume 1: Long Papers ) , pages 6885--6895. Association for Computational Linguistics

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.474 2022
[17]

Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101 Decoupled weight decay regularization . Preprint, arXiv:1711.05101

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[18]

Renze Lou, Kai Zhang, and Wenpeng Yin. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00523 Large language model instruction following: A survey of progresses and challenges . Computational Linguistics, 50(3):1053--1095

work page doi:10.1162/coli_a_00523 2024
[19]

Meta ai research

Meta AI . Meta ai research. https://ai.meta.com/. Accessed: 2025-09-22

work page 2025
[20]

Lesly Miculicich, Yujia Xie, Song Wang, and Pengcheng He. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.05171 REPILOT : Summarization with Precise Length Control . Preprint, arXiv:2305.05171

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.05171 2023
[21]

Ramesh Nallapati, Bowen Zhou, Cicero dos Santos, C a g lar Gu l c ehre, and Bing Xiang. 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K16-1028 Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNN s and beyond . In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning , pages 280--290, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computatio...

work page doi:10.18653/v1/k16-1028 2016
[22]

Cohen, and Mirella Lapata

Shashi Narayan, Shay B. Cohen, and Mirella Lapata. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1206 Don ' t give me the details, just the summary! topic-aware convolutional neural networks for extreme summarization . In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1797--1807, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Co...

work page doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1206 2018
[23]

Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever. 2018. Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training

work page 2018
[24]

Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683 Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer . Preprint, arXiv:1910.10683

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[25]

Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05250 Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text . Preprint, arXiv:1606.05250

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[26]

C.E. Shannon. 1949. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969 Communication in the presence of noise . Proceedings of the IRE, 37(1):10--21

work page doi:10.1109/jrproc.1949.232969 1949
[27]

Peter Shaw, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Ashish Vaswani. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2074 Self-attention with relative position representations . In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) , pages 464--468, New Orleans, Louisi...

work page doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2074 2018
[28]

Shlomo Stept. 2023. https://huggingface.co/sysresearch101/t5-large-finetuned-xsum-cnn T5-large fine-tuned on xsum + cnn/dailymail for abstractive summarization

work page 2023
[29]

Sho Takase and Naoaki Okazaki. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.07418 Positional Encoding to Control Output Sequence Length . Preprint, arXiv:1904.07418

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.07418 2019
[30]

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf Attention is all you need . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc

work page 2017
[31]

Zhongyi Yu, Zhenghao Wu, Hao Zheng, Zhe XuanYuan, Jefferson Fong, and Weifeng Su. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.00316 LenAtten : An Effective Length Controlling Unit For Text Summarization . Preprint, arXiv:2106.00316

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.00316 2021
[32]

BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT

Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.09675 BERTScore : Evaluating Text Generation with BERT . Preprint, arXiv:1904.09675

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09675 2020
[33]

Haiyan Zhao, Hanjie Chen, Fan Yang, Ninghao Liu, Huiqi Deng, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, and Mengnan Du. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01029 Explainability for large language models: A survey . Preprint, arXiv:2309.01029

work page arXiv 2023