pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.07172 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-08 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Chiral, parity-doublet, effective-Lagrangian mean-field theories for nuclear and astrophysical phenomenology

Ayon Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords parity doubletchiral symmetryeffective Lagrangianmean fieldnuclear matterneutron starsequation of statechirally invariant mass
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Parity-doublet models allow baryons to keep mass even after the chiral condensate disappears through a symmetry-invariant term m0.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review presents chiral-parity effective Lagrangian models as a compact way to describe baryons together with their negative-parity partners while respecting linearly realized chiral symmetry. The central addition is a chirally invariant mass term m0 that keeps baryon masses finite even when the condensate melts, unlike standard linear sigma models. This feature supports a single framework for hadronic matter from vacuum properties through nuclear saturation to dense stellar interiors. The discussion covers mirror versus naive assignments, the role of vector mesons in saturation, and consequences for the dense-matter equation of state and neutron-star cooling. Recent lattice and phenomenological bounds on m0 are compiled to constrain the approach.

Core claim

Parity-doublet effective Lagrangians accommodate a chirally invariant mass term m0 that remains nonzero when the chiral condensate vanishes, thereby enabling a unified mean-field treatment of baryonic matter across vacuum, nuclear, and astrophysical density regimes while preserving chiral symmetry.

What carries the argument

The parity-doublet Lagrangian with its chirally invariant mass term m0 that survives condensate melting and is used in the mean-field approximation for nuclear and stellar matter.

If this is right

  • Vector interactions in the mean-field treatment produce nuclear saturation at the correct density and binding energy.
  • Parity doubling modifies the equation of state at high density and thereby affects neutron-star mass-radius relations.
  • The presence of parity partners influences neutrino emission rates and therefore neutron-star cooling curves.
  • Lattice and phenomenological constraints on m0 reduce the model parameter space for applications to dense matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be extended by adding mesonic fluctuations to test stability at supranuclear densities where mean-field may break down.
  • Matching to quark-based descriptions at still higher densities would require tracking how m0 evolves across a possible phase transition.
  • Gravitational-wave signals from neutron-star mergers offer an independent test of the parity-doubled equation of state beyond static properties.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field approximation remains adequate for a unified description from vacuum through nuclear matter to dense astrophysical conditions.

What would settle it

Lattice QCD results at finite temperature showing that the chirally invariant mass m0 must be zero or that the predicted baryon mass splitting contradicts observed parity-partner masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.07172 by Ayon Mukherjee.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Masses of the positive- and negative-parity nucleons in the mirror and naïve assignments, as functions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Temperature dependence of the effective masses of the positive- and negative-parity nucleons in one of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Binding energy comparison: (a) binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chiral-parity (parity-doublet) effective Lagrangian models provide a compact and symmetry-consistent framework for describing baryons and their negative-parity partners in terms of linearly-realized chiral symmetry. Unlike the conventional, linear, sigma model; the parity-doublet approach accommodates a chirally-invariant mass term, $m_0$, allowing finite baryon-masses even when the chiral condensate melts. This feature enables a unified treatment of hadronic matter across vacuum, nuclear and dense astrophysical regimes. This compact review summarizes the key structures of parity-doublet Lagrangians; outlines the mean-field formulation for nuclear and stellar matter; and highlights recent phenomenological and lattice constraints on the chirally-invariant mass. Emphasis is placed on mirror versus na\"ive chiral assignments; the role of vector interactions in achieving nuclear saturation; and the implications of parity doubling for the equation-of-state of dense matter and neutron-star cooling. The review concludes with current theoretical challenges and perspectives for extending these models beyond the mean-field approximation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a compact review of chiral-parity (parity-doublet) effective Lagrangian models that employ linearly realized chiral symmetry to describe baryons and their negative-parity partners. Central to the framework is the chirally invariant mass parameter m0, which permits finite baryon masses even when the chiral condensate vanishes, thereby enabling a unified mean-field treatment of hadronic matter from vacuum through nuclear saturation to dense astrophysical regimes. The review outlines the Lagrangian structures, contrasts mirror and naïve assignments, discusses the role of vector interactions for saturation, summarizes phenomenological and lattice constraints on m0, and addresses implications for the equation of state and neutron-star cooling, while noting current challenges and the need to move beyond mean field.

Significance. If the summaries of existing literature are accurate and balanced, the review provides a useful, self-contained reference that consolidates the symmetry advantages of parity-doublet constructions over conventional linear sigma models. Explicit discussion of lattice and phenomenological bounds on m0 together with the acknowledgment of mean-field limitations and future extensions beyond mean field adds practical value for researchers seeking unified descriptions of nuclear and stellar matter.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the review 'highlights recent phenomenological and lattice constraints on the chirally-invariant mass,' yet the text does not appear to include an explicit table or figure compiling the numerical ranges and references for m0; adding such a summary would improve accessibility without altering the central narrative.
  2. In the discussion of mirror versus naïve assignments, the distinction is described qualitatively; a brief side-by-side comparison of the transformation properties under chiral rotations (perhaps in an appendix or short table) would clarify the difference for readers less familiar with the assignments.
  3. The concluding section on theoretical challenges correctly flags the need to go beyond mean field, but a short paragraph sketching one concrete example of a fluctuation correction or functional renormalization-group treatment would make the perspective more actionable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and recommendation of minor revision. The report accurately captures the scope and intent of the manuscript as a compact review of parity-doublet models. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no point-by-point revisions to address at this stage. We are prepared to incorporate any additional suggestions that may arise during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this review paper

full rationale

This is a review summarizing structures, mean-field formulations, and constraints from prior literature on parity-doublet models. The central claim regarding the chirally-invariant mass m0 is definitional to the cited constructions and not derived anew here. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation chain to an input defined inside this manuscript; external references and explicit discussion of limitations keep the presentation self-contained against benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard effective-field-theory assumptions of linearly realized chiral symmetry and on external lattice and phenomenological constraints for the value of m0; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced by the review itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry is realized linearly in the effective Lagrangian for baryons and their parity partners.
    Stated in the opening sentence of the abstract as the defining feature of the parity-doublet approach.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1146 out tokens · 37102 ms · 2026-05-17T01:30:47.050619+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Chiral-parity (parity-doublet) effective Lagrangian models provide a compact and symmetry-consistent framework for describing baryons and their negative-parity partners in terms of linearly-realized chiral symmetry. Unlike the conventional, linear, sigma model; the parity-doublet approach accommodates a chirally-invariant mass term, m0, allowing finite baryon-masses even when the chiral condensate melts.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. I

    Y. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity I, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345–358.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.122.345

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.122.345 1961

  2. [2]

    Nambu, G

    Y. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity II, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 246–254.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.246

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.124.246 1961

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1568–1577.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.166.1568

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.166.1568 1968

  4. [4]

    Weise, Chiral symmetry in strongly interacting matter: from nuclear matter to phases of QCD, Prog

    W. Weise, Chiral symmetry in strongly interacting matter: from nuclear matter to phases of QCD, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 186 (2010) 390–403.doi:10.1143/PTPS.186.390

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.186.390 2010

  5. [5]

    Gell-Mann, M

    M. Gell-Mann, M. Lévy, The axial vector current in beta decay, Nuovo Cim. 16 (1960) 705.doi: 10.1007/BF02859738

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02859738 1960

  6. [6]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of rela- tivity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of rela- tivity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972

    work page 1972

  7. [7]

    Weinberg, Dynamical approach to current algebra, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Dynamical approach to current algebra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 188–191.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.188

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.18.188 1967

  8. [8]

    Fukushima, Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop, Phys. Lett. B 591 (2004) 277–284. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.04.027. 8

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.04.027 2004

  9. [9]

    Fukushima, Y

    K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, A model study of the sign problem in the mean-field approximation, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 036002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.036002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.036002 2007

  10. [10]

    Fukushima, Critical surface in hot and dense QCD with the vector interaction, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Critical surface in hot and dense QCD with the vector interaction, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 114019.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.114019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.114019 2008

  11. [11]

    Fukushima, Phase diagrams in the three-flavour Nambu−Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Phase diagrams in the three-flavour Nambu−Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114028, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 039902].doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.77.114028,10.1103/PhysRevD.78.039902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.039902 2008

  12. [12]

    Fukushima, Isentropic thermodynamics in the PNJL model, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Isentropic thermodynamics in the PNJL model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 074015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.074015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.074015 2009

  13. [13]

    Fukushima, Hadron resonance gas and mean-field nuclear matter for baryon number fluctuations, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Hadron resonance gas and mean-field nuclear matter for baryon number fluctuations, Phys. Rev. C 91 (4) (2015) 044910.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044910

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.044910 2015

  14. [14]

    Fukushima, Quark description of the Nambu-Goldstone bosons in the colour-flavour locked phase, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Quark description of the Nambu-Goldstone bosons in the colour-flavour locked phase, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094014.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.094014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.094014 2004

  15. [15]

    Fukushima, C

    K. Fukushima, C. Sasaki, The phase diagram of nuclear and quark matter at high baryon density, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72 (2013) 99–154.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.003 2013

  16. [16]

    Stöcker, W

    H. Stöcker, W. Greiner, High-energy heavy-ion collisions: probing the equation-of-state of highly excited hadronic matter, Phys. Rept. 137 (1986) 277–392.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90131-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90131-6 1986

  17. [17]

    Schaefer, J

    B.-J. Schaefer, J. Pawlowski, J. Wambach, The phase structure of the Polyakov-quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 074023.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.074023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.074023 2007

  18. [18]

    Ratti, M

    C. Ratti, M. Thaler, W. Weise, Phases of QCD: lattice thermodynamics and a field theoretical model, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 014019.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.014019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.014019 2006

  19. [19]

    Ratti, W

    C. Ratti, W. Weise, Thermodynamics of two-colour QCD and the Nambu−Jona-Lasinio model, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 054013.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.054013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.054013 2004

  20. [20]

    DeTar, T

    C. DeTar, T. Kunihiro, Linear sigma model with parity doubling, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 2805–2808. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2805

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.2805 1989

  21. [21]

    Nemoto, D

    Y. Nemoto, D. Jido, M. Oka, A. Hosaka, Decays of1 2-baryons in chiral effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4124–4135.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4124

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.4124 1998

  22. [22]

    D. Jido, M. Oka, A. Hosaka, Chiral symmetry of baryons, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106 (2001) 873–908. doi:10.1143/PTP.106.873

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.106.873 2001

  23. [23]

    D. Jido, J. Oller, E. Oset et al., Chiral dynamics of the twoΛ(1405) states, Nucl. Phys. A 725 (2003) 181–200.doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01598-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(03)01598-7 2003

  24. [25]

    Gallas, F

    S. Gallas, F. Giacosa, Mirror versus naive assignment in chiral models for the nucleon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (17) (2014) 1450098.doi:10.1142/S0217751X14500985

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x14500985 2014

  25. [26]

    Papazoglou, S

    P. Papazoglou, S. Schramm, J. Schaffner-Bielich et al., Chiral Lagrangian for strange hadronic matter, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 2576–2588.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2576

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.57.2576 1998

  26. [27]

    Papazoglou, D

    P. Papazoglou, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm et al., Nuclei in a chiral SU(3) model, Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 411–427.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.411. 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.59.411 1999

  27. [28]

    Boguta, A

    J. Boguta, A. Bodmer, Relativistic calculation of nuclear matter and the nuclear surface, Nucl. Phys. A 292 (1977) 413–428.doi:10.1016/0375-9474(77)90626-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(77)90626-1 1977

  28. [29]

    Boguta, A saturating chiral field theory of nuclear matter, Phys

    J. Boguta, A saturating chiral field theory of nuclear matter, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1-3) (1983) 34–38

    work page 1983

  29. [30]

    Serot, J

    B. Serot, J. Walecka, The relativistic nuclear many body problem, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16 (1986) 1–327

    work page 1986

  30. [31]

    Dexheimer, G

    V. Dexheimer, G. Pagliara, L. Tolos et al., Neutron stars within the SU(2) parity doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. A38 (2008) 105–113.doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10652-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10652-0 2008

  31. [32]

    Steinheimer, S

    J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm, H. Stocker, An effective chiral hadron-quark equation-of-state, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 035001.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/3/035001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/3/035001 2011

  32. [33]

    Dexheimer, J

    V. Dexheimer, J. Steinheimer, R. Negreiros, S. Schramm, Hybrid stars in an SU(3) parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 87 (1) (2013) 015804.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.015804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.015804 2013

  33. [34]

    Motohiro, Y

    Y. Motohiro, Y. Kim, M. Harada, Asymmetric nuclear matter in a parity doublet model with hidden local symmetry, Phys. Rev. C 92 (2) (2015) 025201, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 95 (5) (2017) 059903]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.025201,10.1103/PhysRevC.95.059903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.025201 2015

  34. [35]

    Minamikawa, T

    T. Minamikawa, T. Kojo, M. Harada, Chiral condensates for neutron stars in hadron-quark crossover: from a parity doublet nucleon model to a Nambu–Jona-Lasinio quark model, Phys. Rev. C 104 (6) (2021) 065201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.065201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.065201 2021

  35. [36]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, S. Hands et al., Nucleons and parity doubling across the deconfinement transi- tion, Phys. Rev. D 92 (1) (2015) 014503.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.014503 2015

  36. [37]

    Yamazaki, M

    T. Yamazaki, M. Harada, Constraint to chiral invariant masses of nucleons from GW170817 in an extended parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2) (2019) 025205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100. 025205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100 2019

  37. [38]

    Cheng, P

    M. Cheng, P. Hegde, C. Jung et al., Baryon number, strangeness and electric charge fluctuations in QCD at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 79 (7) (2009) 074505.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.074505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.074505 2009

  38. [39]

    Mukherjee, J

    A. Mukherjee, J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm, Higher-order baryon number susceptibilities: interplay between the chiral and the nuclear liquid-gas transitions, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2) (2017) 025205.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.025205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.025205 2017

  39. [40]

    Steinheimer, Y

    J. Steinheimer, Y. Wang, A. Mukherjee et al., Nuclear interactions and net-proton number fluc- tuations in heavy-ion collisions at the SIS18 accelerator, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 40–45.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.068 2018

  40. [41]

    Steinheimer, S

    J. Steinheimer, S. Schramm, The problem of repulsive quark interactions: lattice versus mean field models, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 257–261.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.046

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.046 2011

  41. [42]

    Abuki, R

    H. Abuki, R. Anglani, R. Gatto et al., Chiral crossover, deconfinement and quarkyonic matter within a Nambu−Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034034.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.034034

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.034034 2008

  42. [43]

    Abuki, M

    H. Abuki, M. Ciminale, R. Gatto et al., Electrical neutrality and pion modes in the two-flavour PNJL model, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 014002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.014002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.014002 2008

  43. [45]

    M. Abu-Shady, Extended chiral quark models in the framework of quantum chromodynamics: theory and their applications in hot and dense mediums, ARXIV:1707.08045 (2017).doi:10.48550/arXiv. 1707.08045. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2017

  44. [46]

    Mukherjee, A

    A. Mukherjee, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Schramm, Effects of a non-zero strangeness-chemical-potential in strong interaction models, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134899.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019. 134899

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019 2019

  45. [47]

    Adhikari, S

    P. Adhikari, S. Beleznay, M. Mannarelli, Finite density two-colour chiral perturbation theory revis- ited, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (6) (2018) 441.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5934-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5934-6 2018

  46. [48]

    Mukherjee, S

    A. Mukherjee, S. Schramm, J. Steinheimer, V. Dexheimer, The application of the quark-hadron chiral parity-doublet model to neutron star matter, Astron. Astrophys. 608 (2017) A110.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731505

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731505 2017

  47. [49]

    Y.-K. Kong, Y. Kim, M. Harada, Nuclear matter and finite nuclei: recent studies based on parity doublet model, Symmetry 16 (9) (2024).doi:10.3390/sym16091238

    work page doi:10.3390/sym16091238 2024

  48. [50]

    Hanauske, J

    M. Hanauske, J. Steinheimer, L. Bovard et al., Concluding remarks: connecting relativistic heavy- ion collisions and neutron-star mergers by the equation-of-state of dense hadron- and quark- matter as signalled by gravitational waves, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 878 (1) (2017) 012031.doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031 2017

  49. [51]

    Schramm, V

    S. Schramm, V. Dexheimer, A. Mukherjee, J. Steinheimer, Neutron stars and the equation-of-state, J. Astrophys. Astron. 39 (4) (2018) 42.doi:10.1007/s12036-018-9534-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-018-9534-5 2018

  50. [52]

    Schramm, V

    S. Schramm, V. Dexheimer, A. Mukherjee, J. Steinheimer, Dense and hot matter in compact stars and heavy-ion collisions, EPJ Web of Conferences 171 (2018) 08002

    work page 2018

  51. [53]

    Schramm, V

    S. Schramm, V. Dexheimer, J. Steinheimer, A. Mukherjee, Exotic matter in neutron stars and the equation-of-state, PoS FRAPWS2018 (2019) 048.doi:10.22323/1.331.0048

    work page doi:10.22323/1.331.0048 2019

  52. [54]

    Schramm, J

    S. Schramm, J. Steinheimer, V. Dexheimer, A. Mukherjee, Modelling hybrid stars and hot matter, Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 887–890.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.067

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.067 2019

  53. [55]

    Steinheimer, A

    J. Steinheimer, A. Mukherjee, N. Wechselberger et al., The hot and dense QCD equation-of-state in heavy-ion collisions and neutron-star mergers, Springer Proc. Phys. 208 (2018) 191–198.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94256-8_22

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94256-8_22 2018

  54. [57]

    Marczenko, L

    M. Marczenko, L. McLerran, K. Redlich, C. Sasaki, Reaching percolation and conformal limits in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2) (2023) 025802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.025802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.025802 2023

  55. [58]

    Weyrich, N

    J. Weyrich, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal, Chiral mirror-baryon-meson model and nuclear matter beyond mean-field approximation, Phys. Rev. C 92 (1) (2015) 015214.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92. 015214

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.92 2015

  56. [59]

    Casalbuoni, D

    R. Casalbuoni, D. Dominici, R. Gatto, Effective Lagrangian description of the possible strong sector of the standard model, Physics Letters B 147 (6) (1984) 419–424

    work page 1984

  57. [60]

    Hatsuda, M

    T. Hatsuda, M. Prakash, Parity doubling of the nucleon and first order chiral transition in dense matter, Phys. Lett. B 224 (1989) 11–15.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91040-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91040-x 1989

  58. [61]

    Hosaka, D

    A. Hosaka, D. Jido, M. Oka, Chiral symmetry aspects of positive and negative parity baryons, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 149 (2003) 203–214.doi:10.1143/PTPS.149.203

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.149.203 2003

  59. [62]

    Walecka, A theory of highly condensed matter, Annals Phys

    J. Walecka, A theory of highly condensed matter, Annals Phys. 83 (1974) 491–529.doi:10.1016/ 0003-4916(74)90208-5. 11

    work page 1974

  60. [63]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 121–180.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.121 2003

  61. [64]

    Cleymans, M

    J. Cleymans, M. Gorenstein, J. Stalnacke, E. Suhonen, Excluded volume effect and the quark - hadron phase transition, Phys. Scripta 48 (1993) 277–280.doi:10.1088/0031-8949/48/3/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/48/3/004 1993

  62. [65]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, D. de Boni et al., Light baryons below and above the deconfinement transition: medium effects and parity doubling, JHEP 06 (2017) 034.doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)034

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2017)034 2017

  63. [66]

    In:Physics Reports363.4 (2002)

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich, Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rept. 363 (2002) 223–386.doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00098-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9 2002

  64. [67]

    Fodor, S

    Z. Fodor, S. Katz, Critical point of QCD at finiteTandµ, lattice results for physical quark masses, JHEP 04 (2004) 050.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/050

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/050 2004

  65. [68]

    Herold, M

    C. Herold, M. Nahrgang, Y. Yan, C. Kobdaj, Dynamical net-proton fluctuations near a QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2) (2016) 021902.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.021902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.021902 2016

  66. [69]

    Rafelski, B

    J. Rafelski, B. Muller, Strangeness production in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1066, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2334].doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1066,10.1103/ PhysRevLett.56.2334

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1066 1982

  67. [70]

    Rößner, C

    S. Rößner, C. Ratti, W. Weise, Polyakov loop, diquarks and the two-flavour phase diagram, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 034007.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.034007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.034007 2007

  68. [71]

    Veneziano, S

    G. Veneziano, S. Yankielowicz, An effective Lagrangian for the pureN= 1supersymmetric Yang- Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 113 (3) (1982) 231–236

    work page 1982

  69. [72]

    Ferreira, P

    M. Ferreira, P. Costa, D. Menezes et al., Deconfinement and chiral restoration within the SU(3) Polyakov−Nambu−Jona-Lasinio and entangled Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio models in an exter- nal magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 89 (1) (2014) 016002, [Addendum: Phys. Rev. D 89 (1) (2014) 019902].doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.016002,10.1103/PhysRevD.89.019902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.016002 2014

  70. [73]

    Satarov, M

    L. Satarov, M. Dmitriev, I. Mishustin, Equation-of-state of hadron resonance gas and the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 72 (2009) 1390–1415.doi:10.1134/ S1063778809080146

    work page 2009

  71. [74]

    Rößner, T

    S. Rößner, T. Hell, C. Ratti, W. Weise, The chiral and deconfinement crossover transitions: PNJL model beyond mean field, Nucl. Phys. A 814 (2008) 118–143.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.10. 006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.10 2008

  72. [75]

    Stephanov, K

    M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, E. Shuryak, Signatures of the tricritical point in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4816–4819.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4816

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.4816 1998

  73. [76]

    Cohen, R

    T. Cohen, R. Furnstahl, D. Griegel, Quark and gluon condensates in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992) 1881–1893.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.45.1881

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.45.1881 1992

  74. [77]

    Rusnak, R

    J. Rusnak, R. Furnstahl, Relativistic point-coupling models as effective theories of nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 627 (3) (1997) 495–521.doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00598-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00598-8 1997

  75. [78]

    Furnstahl, B

    R. Furnstahl, B. Serot, H.-B. Tang, A chiral effective lagrangian for nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 615 (4) (1997) 441–482, [Erratum: Nucl. Phys. A 640 (1998) 505].doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00472-1, 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00449-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(96)00472-1 1997

  76. [79]

    Zschiesche, L

    D. Zschiesche, L. Tolos, J. Schaffner-Bielich, R. Pisarski, Cold, dense nuclear matter in an SU(2) parity doublet model, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 055202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.055202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.75.055202 2007

  77. [80]

    Rischke, M

    D. Rischke, M. Gorenstein, H. Stöcker, W. Greiner, Excluded volume effect for the nuclear matter equation of state, Z. Phys. C 51 (1991) 485–490.doi:10.1007/BF01548574. 12

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01548574 1991

  78. [81]

    Sasaki, B

    C. Sasaki, B. Friman, K. Redlich, Susceptibilities and the phase structure of a chiral model with Polyakov loops, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 074013.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.074013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.074013 2007

  79. [82]

    Y. Kong, T. Minamikawa, M. Harada, Neutron star matter based on a parity doublet model including thea 0(980)meson, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 055206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.055206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.055206 2023

  80. [83]

    Reisdorf, A

    W. Reisdorf, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck et al., Systematics of central heavy-ion collisions in the 1 AGeV regime, Nucl. Phys. A 848 (2010) 366–427.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.09.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.09.008 2010

Showing first 80 references.