pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.09480 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Spontaneous symmetry breaking on graphs and lattices

Oleg Evnin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords spontaneous symmetry breakinggraphslatticesspectral dimensionresistance distanceKirchhoff indexMermin-Wagner theoremharmonic oscillator networks
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Spontaneous symmetry breaking on graphs occurs only when spectral dimension allows finite generalized resistance distances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that spontaneous symmetry breaking can be modeled directly on graphs and lattices by mapping the infrared physics to networks of harmonic oscillators. This reveals that continuous symmetries break spontaneously only if the graph's spectral dimension is high enough for the associated fractional resistance distances and Kirchhoff index to remain finite. A reader would care because the discrete setting makes the role of fluctuations transparent and identifies a wider set of geometries than continuous space where breaking is blocked. The approach sidesteps ultraviolet issues of continuum field theory while recovering the classic dimension restrictions as special cases.

Core claim

Spontaneous symmetry breaking is analyzed by reducing the problem to elementary harmonic oscillator networks on the graph or lattice. The presence of breaking for continuous symmetries is controlled by whether fractional generalizations of the resistance distance and the Kirchhoff index stay finite, quantities that are in turn governed by the spectral dimension of the discrete structure. This produces a richer collection of geometries in which large fluctuations prevent spontaneous breaking than exist on conventional manifolds.

What carries the argument

fractional generalizations of resistance distance and the Kirchhoff index on graphs, determined by spectral dimension

If this is right

  • Graphs whose spectral dimension lies below two exhibit no spontaneous breaking of continuous symmetries.
  • The Kirchhoff index provides a concrete numerical test for whether an ordered phase can exist on a given network.
  • Discrete structures admit ordered phases in some geometries forbidden on continuous manifolds and forbid them in others.
  • The oscillator-network reduction supplies a direct route to the symmetry-breaking criterion without continuum renormalization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resistance-distance criterion could classify symmetry properties of real-world networks such as social or biological graphs.
  • Engineered lattices with tunable spectral dimension offer a laboratory test of the predicted threshold for breaking.
  • Extensions to time-dependent graphs might reveal new dynamical regimes of symmetry restoration.

Load-bearing premise

The infrared effect of spontaneous symmetry breaking is fully captured by the spectral properties of harmonic oscillator networks on the graph.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the order-parameter expectation value in the oscillator network on a fractal graph whose spectral dimension lies strictly between one and two.

read the original abstract

Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a cornerstone of modern physics, defining a wealth of phenomena in condensed-matter and high-energy physics, and beyond. It requires an infinite number of degrees of freedom, and even then, for continuous symmetries, it only works if the spatial dimension is not too low, following the classic results of Coleman, Hohenberg, Mermin and Wagner. While usually discussed in the context of quantum and statistical field theories, and in particular, effective field theories, there are advantages in addressing the same kind of phenomena on discrete geometric structures rather than conventional manifolds. When the space is discretized into a lattice, a lucid picture of conventional spontaneous symmetry breaking springs up, with the ultraviolet issues of continuum quantum field theory out-of-sight, and the key effect, which is infrared in nature, revealed through elementary harmonic oscillator networks. From there, it is natural to generalize lattices to other graphs/networks. In this setting, the presence of spontaneous symmetry breaking is controlled by fractional generalizations of resistance distance and the Kirchhoff index, and most broadly by the spectral dimension. Predictably, because of the richness of discrete geometric structures in comparison with continuous manifolds, a broader array of geometries emerge where spontaneous breaking of continuous symmetries is blocked by large fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) of continuous symmetries on graphs and lattices can be diagnosed via networks of harmonic oscillators, where the infrared divergence responsible for blocking SSB is captured by the divergence of fractional generalizations of the resistance distance and Kirchhoff index constructed from the graph Laplacian spectrum; the controlling quantity is ultimately the spectral dimension, yielding a richer set of blocking geometries than on manifolds.

Significance. If the mapping from spectral properties to SSB holds, the work supplies a concrete, graph-theoretic extension of Mermin-Wagner/Coleman-type theorems that is directly computable on irregular discrete structures and avoids continuum UV issues. The resistance-distance criterion could be useful for complex networks, fractals, and disordered media where spectral dimension is well-defined.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main derivation (harmonic-oscillator network section)] The central claim equates the presence/absence of SSB to divergence of the fractional resistance distance/Kirchhoff index derived from the Laplacian spectrum. This requires that the quadratic fluctuation model reproduces the infrared divergence of the two-point function exactly as in the continuum Mermin-Wagner analysis; on general graphs, localization or multifractality of eigenmodes can alter return probabilities and IR scaling beyond the spectral-dimension prediction, yet no explicit check against known lattice results (e.g., 1D/2D regular lattices) is supplied before generalization.
  2. [Introduction and § on discrete geometric structures] The manuscript asserts that the infrared effect of SSB is captured by elementary harmonic oscillator networks without full QFT machinery. This assumption is load-bearing for the resistance-distance criterion; if the Gaussian model misses non-Gaussian or topological contributions that survive on graphs, the spectral-dimension control fails to decide SSB.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'fractional generalizations of resistance distance' without a one-line definition or reference to the precise fractional power of the Laplacian; adding this would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important points about validation on standard lattices and the scope of the Gaussian approximation, which we address below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit checks and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim equates the presence/absence of SSB to divergence of the fractional resistance distance/Kirchhoff index derived from the Laplacian spectrum. This requires that the quadratic fluctuation model reproduces the infrared divergence of the two-point function exactly as in the continuum Mermin-Wagner analysis; on general graphs, localization or multifractality of eigenmodes can alter return probabilities and IR scaling beyond the spectral-dimension prediction, yet no explicit check against known lattice results (e.g., 1D/2D regular lattices) is supplied before generalization.

    Authors: We agree that baseline validation on regular lattices strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit subsection computing the (fractional) resistance distance and Kirchhoff index for the 1D chain and 2D square lattice using the known Laplacian spectrum. These recover the expected divergences (linear in 1D, logarithmic in 2D) that prohibit SSB, while the quantities converge for d>2, reproducing the Mermin-Wagner theorem. The spectral dimension d_s enters the scaling of the return probability and hence the resistance distance; when eigenmodes are localized the effective d_s is reduced or undefined, so our criterion applies to graphs where d_s is well-defined (regular lattices, fractals, etc.). We have added a remark clarifying this scope. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript asserts that the infrared effect of SSB is captured by elementary harmonic oscillator networks without full QFT machinery. This assumption is load-bearing for the resistance-distance criterion; if the Gaussian model misses non-Gaussian or topological contributions that survive on graphs, the spectral-dimension control fails to decide SSB.

    Authors: The quadratic harmonic-oscillator network isolates the infrared divergence of Goldstone-mode fluctuations, which is the mechanism underlying the classic Mermin-Wagner/Coleman theorems. Non-Gaussian and topological corrections (e.g., vortices) can renormalize couplings or induce Kosterlitz-Thouless physics, but they do not eliminate the fundamental infrared divergence that blocks true long-range order in low dimensions. On graphs the same logic holds: the resistance-distance criterion diagnoses whether fluctuations diverge, independent of higher-order terms. We have expanded the introduction to reference the Bogoliubov inequality approach and to state explicitly that the Gaussian model suffices for the infrared diagnostic, while noting that topological effects would only strengthen the no-SSB conclusion in marginal cases. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from harmonic model to spectral criteria without self-definition or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper constructs the SSB criterion on graphs by mapping the infrared fluctuations to a network of harmonic oscillators whose two-point functions are controlled by the graph Laplacian. It then identifies the relevant infrared divergence with the fractional resistance distance and Kirchhoff index built from the Laplacian spectrum, and finally ties the presence/absence of breaking to the spectral dimension. None of these steps reduces to a tautological redefinition of the input quantities; the resistance-distance expressions are derived from the Green's function of the oscillator network rather than fitted to the target SSB outcome, and the spectral-dimension link follows from standard return-probability asymptotics on graphs. No load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling is required for the central chain, which remains independent of the final claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper builds on standard SSB theory but applies it to graphs using known graph theory quantities like resistance distance, without introducing new fitted parameters or invented entities in the described approach.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous symmetry breaking requires infinite degrees of freedom and sufficient spatial dimension for continuous symmetries.
    Standard result from Coleman, Hohenberg, Mermin and Wagner, invoked as background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1224 out tokens · 25224 ms · 2026-05-16T23:47:19.420733+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nambu,Nobel Lecture: Spontaneous symmetry breaking in particle physics: a case of cross fertilization,Rev

    Y. Nambu,Nobel Lecture: Spontaneous symmetry breaking in particle physics: a case of cross fertilization,Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 1015

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    T. W. B. Kibble,Englert-Brout-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble mechanism (history), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 6001

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Englert,Nobel Lecture: the BEH mechanism and its scalar boson, Rev

    F. Englert,Nobel Lecture: the BEH mechanism and its scalar boson, Rev. Mod. Phys.86(2014) 843

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Weinberg,Nobel Lecture: Conceptual foundations of the unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions,Rev

    S. Weinberg,Nobel Lecture: Conceptual foundations of the unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.521980) 515

    work page

  5. [5]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner,Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17(1966) 1133

    work page 1966

  6. [6]

    P. C. Hohenberg,Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev.158(1967) 383

    work page 1967

  7. [7]

    S. R. Coleman,There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys.31(1973) 259

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    Ma and R

    S.-k. Ma and R. Rajaraman,Comments on the absence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in low dimensions,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 1701

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    Ratra,Restoration of spontaneously broken continuous symmetries in de Sitter spacetime,Phys

    B. Ratra,Restoration of spontaneously broken continuous symmetries in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1931

    work page 1985

  10. [10]

    Antoniadis, J

    I. Antoniadis, J. Iliopoulos and T. N. Tomaras,Quantum instability of de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 1319

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    Cosmological Dark Energy: Prospects for a Dynamical Theory

    I. Antoniadis, P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola,Cosmological dark energy: prospects for a dynamical theory,New J. Phys.9(2007) 11, arXiv:gr-qc/0612068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    S. L. Lukyanov,Form-factors of exponential fields in the sine-Gordon model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A12(1997), 2543, arXiv:hep-th/9703190. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  13. [13]

    Hamiltonian Truncation Study of the Phi^4 Theory in Two Dimensions

    S. Rychkov and L. G. Vitale,Hamiltonian truncation study of theφ 4 theory in two dimen- sions,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 085011, arXiv:1412.3460 [hep-th];Hamiltonian truncation study of theφ 4 theory in two dimensions II: theZ 2 -broken phase and the Chang duality, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 065014, arXiv:1512.00493 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Bosons in Quantum Many-Body Systems

    T. Brauner,Spontaneous symmetry breaking and Nambu-Goldstone bosons in quantum many-body systems,Symmetry2(2010) 609, arXiv:1001.5212 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    On the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and its relation to charge densities

    H. Watanabe and T. Brauner,On the number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and its relation to charge densities,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 125013, arXiv:1109.6327 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Remarks on nonrelativistic Goldstone bosons

    A. Kapustin,Remarks on nonrelativistic Goldstone bosons,arXiv:1207.0457 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Effective Lagrangian for Nonrelativistic Systems

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama,Effective Lagrangian for nonrelativistic systems, Phys. Rev. X4(2014) 031057, arXiv:1402.7066 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Scalar Field Theories with Polynomial Shift Symmetries

    T. Griffin, K. T. Grosvenor, P. Hoˇ rava and Z. Yan,Scalar field theories with polynomial shift symmetries,Comm. Math. Phys.340(2015) 985, arXiv:1412.1046 [hep-th]; Cascading multicriticality in nonrelativistic spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 241601 arXiv:1507.06992 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Creutz,Quarks, gluons and lattices(CUP, 2023)

    M. Creutz,Quarks, gluons and lattices(CUP, 2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    R. I. Nepomechie,Approaches to a non-abelian antisymmetric tensor gauge field theory, Nucl. Phys. B212(1983) 301

    work page 1983

  21. [21]

    Jacobson and T

    T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern- Simons theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 125017, arXiv:2303.06160 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    N. H. Christ, R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee,Random lattice field theory: general formula- tion,Nucl. Phys. B202(1982) 89;Weights of links and plaquettes in a random lattice, Nucl. Phys. B210(1982) 337

    work page 1982

  23. [23]

    Loll, Class

    R. Loll,Quantum gravity from causal dynamical triangulations: a review,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) 013002, arXiv:1905.08669 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    R. C. Brower, M. Cheng, G. T. Fleming, A. D. Gasbarro, T. G. Raben, C. I. Tan and E. S. Weinberg,Latticeϕ 4 field theory on Riemann manifolds: numerical tests for the 2-d Ising CFT onS 2,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 014502, arXiv:1803.08512 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Candido, G

    A. Candido, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia and F. Rottoli,Compact gauge fields on causal dynamical triangulations: a 2d case study,JHEP04(2021) 184, arXiv:2010.15714 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Ambjørn, Z

    J. Ambjørn, Z. Drogosz, J. Gizbert-Studnicki, A. G¨ orlich, J. Jurkiewicz and D. N´ emeth, Scalar fields in causal dynamical triangulations,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 195030, arXiv:2105.10086 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Random graph gauge theories as toy models for non-perturbative string theories

    T. Filk,Random graph gauge theories as toy models for nonperturbative string theories, Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 4841, arXiv:hep-th/0010126. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  28. [28]

    Bianconi,The topological Dirac equation of networks and simplicial complexes, J

    G. Bianconi,The topological Dirac equation of networks and simplicial complexes, J. Phys. Compl.2(2021) 035022, arXiv:2106.02929 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Bianconi,Dirac gauge theory for topological spinors in 3+1 dimensional networks, J

    G. Bianconi,Dirac gauge theory for topological spinors in 3+1 dimensional networks, J. Phys. A56(2023) no.27, 275001, arXiv:2212.05621 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Delporte, S

    N. Delporte, S. Sen and R. Toriumi,Dirac walks on regular trees, J. Phys. A57(2024) 275002, arXiv:2312.10881 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Bianconi,Quantum entropy couples matter with geometry, J

    G. Bianconi,Quantum entropy couples matter with geometry, J. Phys. A57(2024) 365002, arXiv:2404.08556 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    R. Wang, Y. Tian, P. Li` o and G. Bianconi,Dirac-equation signal processing: physics boosts topological machine learning,PNAS Nexus4(2025) pgaf139, arXiv:2412.05132 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Kittel,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2005)

    Ch. Kittel,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2005)

    work page 2005

  34. [35]

    Parnovski and N

    L. Parnovski and N. Sidorova.Critical dimensions for counting lattice points in Euclidean annuli,Math. Mod. Nat. Phen.5(2010) 293

    work page 2010

  35. [36]

    Classen and J

    L. Classen and J. J. Betouras,High-order Van Hove singularities and their connection to flat bands,Ann. Rev. Cond. Mat. Phys.16(2025) 229, arXiv:2405.20226 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [37]

    Rajaraman,Solitons and instantons(North Holland, 1982)

    R. Rajaraman,Solitons and instantons(North Holland, 1982)

    work page 1982

  37. [38]

    Evnin,On quantum interacting embedded geometrical objects of various dimensions, Caltech PhD thesis (2006)

    O. Evnin,On quantum interacting embedded geometrical objects of various dimensions, Caltech PhD thesis (2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [39]

    Local recoil of extended solitons: a string theory example

    B. Craps, O. Evnin and S. Nakamura,Local recoil of extended solitons: a string theory example,JHEP01(2007) 050, arXiv:hep-th/0608123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [40]

    Evslin and H

    J. Evslin and H. Liu,An extended soliton’s zero modes,arXiv:2507.18922 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  40. [41]

    Uehara, A

    M. Uehara, A. Hayashi and S. Saito,Meson-soliton scattering with full recoil in standard collective coordinate quantization,Nucl. Phys. A534(1991) 680

    work page 1991

  41. [42]

    D0-brane recoil revisited

    B. Craps, O. Evnin and S. Nakamura,D0-brane recoil revisited, JHEP12(2006) 081, arXiv:hep-th/0609216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [43]

    Evslin and H

    J. Evslin and H. Guo,Alternative to collective coordinates, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) L041701, arXiv:2101.08028 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [44]

    Sen and B

    A. Sen and B. Stefa´ nski Jr.,Scattering of D0-branes and strings, arXiv:2509.02716 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  44. [45]

    A. W. Leissa,Vibration of plates(NASA, 1969). 20

    work page 1969

  45. [46]

    D. J. Klein and M. Randi´ c,Resistance distance,J. Math. Chem.12(1993) 81

    work page 1993

  46. [47]

    Akara-pipattana, T

    P. Akara-pipattana, T. Chotibut and O. Evnin,Resistance distance distribution in large sparse random graphs,J. Stat. Mech.2203(2022) 033404, arXiv:2107.12561 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [48]

    C. R. Laumann, S. A. Parameswaran and S. L. Sondhi,Absence of Goldstone bosons on the Bethe lattice,Phys. Rev. B80(2009) 144415, arXiv:0906.5098 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [49]

    Dhar,Lattices of effectively nonintegral dimensionality,J

    D. Dhar,Lattices of effectively nonintegral dimensionality,J. Math. Phys.18(1977) 577

    work page 1977

  49. [50]

    B. D. Hughes and M. F. Shlesinger,Lattice dynamics, random walks, and nonintegral effective dimensionality,J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 1688

    work page 1982

  50. [51]

    fractons

    S. Alexander and R. Orbach,Density of states on fractals: “fractons”, J. Physique Lett.43(1982) 625

    work page 1982

  51. [52]

    Cassi and S

    D. Cassi and S. Regina,Spectral dimension of branched structures: universality in geometrical disorder,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993)1647

    work page 1993

  52. [53]

    Burioni and D

    R. Burioni and D. Cassi,Universal properties of spectral dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 1091

    work page 1996

  53. [54]

    Spectral Dimension of the Universe

    J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll,The spectral dimension of the universe is scale dependent,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 171301, arXiv:hep-th/0505113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [55]

    A. J. Bray and G. J. Rodgers,Diffusion in a sparsely connected space: a model for glassy relaxation, Phys. Rev. B38(1988) 11461

    work page 1988

  55. [56]

    A. N. Samukhin, S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes,Laplacian spectra of complex networks and random walks on them: Are scale-free architectures really important?, Phys. Rev. E77(2008) 036115, arXiv:0706.1176 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [57]

    Akara-pipattana and O

    P. Akara-pipattana and O. Evnin,Random matrices with row constraints and eigenvalue distributions of graph Laplacians,J. Phys. A56(2023) 295001, arXiv:2212.06499 [cond- mat.dis-nn];Hammerstein equations for sparse random matrices,J. Phys. A58(2025) 035006, arXiv:2410.00355 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [58]

    De Carli, A

    L. De Carli, A. Echezabal and I. Morell,On the Sierpi´ nski triangle and its generalizations, arXiv:2506.20456 [math.NT]

    work page arXiv

  58. [59]

    R. S. Strichartz,Analysis on fractals,Not. Am. Math. Soc.46(1999) 1199

    work page 1999

  59. [60]

    Spectral analysis on infinite Sierpinski fractafolds

    R. Strichartz and A. Teplyaev,Spectral analysis on infinite Sierpi´ nski fractafolds, J. Anal. Math.116(2012) 255, arXiv:1011.1049 [math.FA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [61]

    Hilfer and A

    R. Hilfer and A. Blumen,Renormalisation on Sierpinski-type fractals, J. Phys. A17(1984) L537

    work page 1984

  61. [62]

    G. V. Dunne,Heat kernels and zeta functions on fractals,J. Phys. A45(2012) 374016, arXiv:1205.2723 [math-ph]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [63]

    C. T. Hill,Fractal theory space: space-time of noninteger dimensionality, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 085004, arXiv:hep-th/0210076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  63. [64]

    Ni and Z

    T. Ni and Z. Wen,Construction of free quantum fields on nested fractal space-times, J. Math. Phys.64(2023) 122303

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Abou-Chacra, D

    R. Abou-Chacra, D. J. Thouless and P. W. Anderson,A selfconsistent theory of local- ization,J. Phys. C6(1973) 1734

    work page 1973

  65. [66]

    Abou-Chacra and D

    R. Abou-Chacra and D. J. Thouless,Self-consistent theory of localization II: localization near the band edges,J. Phys. C7(1974) 65

    work page 1974

  66. [67]

    A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov,Localization transition in the Anderson model on the Bethe lattice: spontaneous symmetry breaking and correlation functions, Nucl. Phys. B366(1991) 507

    work page 1991

  67. [68]

    A. P. Mill´ an, G. Gori, F. Battiston, T. Enss and N. Defenu,Complex networks with tuneable dimensions as a universality playground,Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) 023015, arXiv:2006.10421 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [69]

    D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz,Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks, Nature393(1998) 440

    work page 1998

  69. [70]

    J. D. da Silva, D. Tapias, P. Sollich and F. L. Metz,Spectral properties, localization transition and multifractal eigenvectors of the Laplacian on heterogeneous networks, SciPost Phys.18(2025) 047, arXiv:2408.13322 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    L. G. Molinari,Non-Hermitian spectra and Anderson localization, J. Phys. A42(2009) 265204, arXiv:0808.1241 [math-ph]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009