Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

This paper extends odd elasticity—chiral, non-reciprocal elastic response—to curved manifolds, claiming that curvature enters only through the Laplace–Beltrami operator and thereby gaps, textures, and localizes the oscillatory spectrum of a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 06:30 UTC pith:DSOA43KG

load-bearing objection The paper's core covariant equation is internally inconsistent: Eq. (2) reduces to a scalar system with factor-2 errors, changing the exceptional-point condition; the physics of curved odd elasticity still looks worth refereeing after the algebra is fixed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.11037 v2 pith:DSOA43KG submitted 2025-12-11 cond-mat.soft

Curved Odd Elasticity

Yuan Zhou , Lazaros Tsaloukidis , Jack Binysh , Yuchao Chen , Nikta Fakhri , Corentin Coulais , Piotr Sur\'owka This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords odd elasticityactive solidscurved manifoldsLaplace-Beltrami operatornon-reciprocal elasticityexceptional pointsRayleigh wavestopological defects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that odd elasticity—an elastic response in which forces are not reciprocal, so a solid can inject and absorb energy internally—extends naturally to curved manifolds. The central claim is that, once written covariantly, curvature enters the dynamics only through the Laplace–Beltrami operator: the coupled equations for the two scalar potentials have the same non-reciprocal matrix as flat space, and all geometry is contained in the curved Laplacian. On a sphere this yields the exact long-wavelength spectrum with a finite-size gap that closes in the flat limit. On lattices, the same theory captures curvature-textured power injection, thresholdless oscillations bound to topological disclinations, and Rayleigh edge modes at open boundaries. The paper thus provides a geometric baseline for active solids in curved environments, shifting the question from whether a solid oscillates to where and in what form it oscillates.

Core claim

The paper establishes a covariant low-energy theory of odd elasticity on curved manifolds. Its starting point is the claim that the flat-space odd elasticity tensor has a unique covariant extension, built from the reference metric and the Levi-Civita tensor density. Using the Papkovich–Neuber decomposition of the displacement into two scalar potentials, the odd Navier–Cauchy equation reduces to two coupled scalar equations whose only curved ingredient is the Laplace–Beltrami operator. Applied to a sphere this gives the long-wavelength spectrum λ = (B+2μ ± √(B²−4K_o²)) l(l+1)/(2r²), predicting a finite-size gap that closes as the radius grows. Numerical simulations on a torus, sphere, and sph

What carries the argument

The central object is the covariant odd elasticity tensor C_odd^{abcd} = (K_o/2)( ḡ^{ac} ε̄^{bd} + ḡ^{ad} ε̄^{bc} + ḡ^{bc} ε̄^{ad} + ḡ^{bd} ε̄^{ac}), where ε̄ is the Levi-Civita tensor density and K_o is the odd—non-reciprocal, chiral—modulus. Inserted into the two-metric elasticity action it yields the odd Navier–Cauchy equation. The reduction that carries the argument is the Helmholtz–Hodge (Papkovich–Neuber) decomposition u_i = ∇_i χ + ε̄_i^j ∇_j ψ, which turns the vector problem into two coupled scalar equations controlled by the Laplace–Beltrami operator. The spectrum then follows from the eigenvalues of the Laplace–Beltrami operator on each surface—spherical harmonics on a sphere, Four

Load-bearing premise

The entire quantitative spectrum rests on the assertion, stated but not proven, that Eq. (1) is the unique covariant extension of flat odd elasticity, so curvature enters only through the Laplace–Beltrami operator and no curvature-coupled odd moduli appear; the same reduction also assumes two scalar potentials span every displacement mode on a torus.

What would settle it

Measure the low-frequency eigenvalues of a spherical odd-elastic lattice at several radii: Eq. (5) predicts λ_l = (B+2μ ± √(B²−4K_o²)) l(l+1)/(2r²), a pure l(l+1)/r² scaling. Any deviation in the l-dependence or r-dependence, or any mode that depends on the local Ricci scalar beyond the Laplace–Beltrami term, would falsify the claim that curvature enters only through the curved Laplacian.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • On a sphere, curvature opens a finite-size frequency gap ∼1/r²; smaller active shells oscillate at higher frequencies, and the gap closes in the flat-space limit.
  • On surfaces with nonzero Euler characteristic, topologically enforced disclinations host thresholdless oscillatory defect modes for any nonzero odd modulus, before the bulk exceptional transition.
  • Open boundaries support Rayleigh surface waves that are thresholdless and sit above the bulk modes for any odd modulus, so edges destabilize before the bulk.
  • In curved odd solids, eigenmodes develop spatial texture in power injection and dissipation: some plaquettes locally consume energy even when the net power is positive, an experimentally accessible signature of curvature.
  • Coarse-graining the non-reciprocal honeycomb lattice predicts the bulk exceptional transition at k_o*/k = √3(1+6k′/k)/18, matching the simulated threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The uniqueness of the covariant odd tensor is asserted, not proven; curvature-dependent odd moduli proportional to K_o R̄ or Ricci contractions are symmetry-allowed and would enter at the same derivative order, so the theory is best read as a leading-order geometric truncation.
  • On the torus, the two-scalar Helmholtz–Hodge representation misses harmonic vector fields because H¹≠0, so the analytic spectrum may omit global modes that the numerical lattice still contains.
  • The predicted 1/r² gap and defect-bound oscillations suggest a design route: curvature alone can turn a homogeneous active solid into spatially localized micro-oscillators for active metamaterial resonators or mechanical logic.
  • The same covariant construction can be extended to torque densities, Cosserat or micropolar structure, and out-of-plane displacements, where curvature would likely couple to new active moduli—a direction the paper explicitly leaves open.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper develops a covariant formulation of odd elasticity on curved manifolds. Starting from a two-metric elasticity action, the authors write down the odd Navier–Cauchy equation (Eq. 2) and reduce it via Helmholtz–Hodge potentials to two coupled scalar equations (Eq. 3) in which curvature enters only through the Laplace–Beltrami operator. They solve Eq. (3) on a sphere and a slender torus, obtaining spectra (Eqs. 4–5), an exceptional-point threshold B²=4K_o², and a finite-size gap ∼1/r². They support the theory with simulations of a non-reciprocal honeycomb lattice on torus, sphere, and spherical cap, observing curvature-textured power injection, thresholdless defect-bound modes around disclinations, and Rayleigh edge modes. The coarse-grained moduli of the lattice are used to predict the bulk exceptional threshold, which agrees with numerics.

Significance. If correct, the framework provides a useful minimal continuum description of active odd solids on curved substrates, with testable predictions for living chiral crystals and metamaterials. The paper's strengths include an independent coarse-graining of the lattice moduli (SM §IV) that predicts the numerically observed threshold without fitting, and direct numerical evidence for geometry-controlled oscillatory mode structure. The main theoretical results, however, rest on Eq. (3), and the derivation leading to it from the stated governing equation contains a load-bearing algebra error; the uniqueness and completeness claims also need qualification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2) and SM Eq. (12)] The governing equation does not reduce to Eq. (3), and it is not the divergence of the stress from Eq. (1). In flat Cartesian coordinates, the passive part of Eq. (2), ∇[(B−μ)e] + Δ(2μu), equals (B−μ)∇e + 2μΔu, whereas the divergence of the isotropic stress σ=(B−μ)eδ+2μu is B∇e + μΔu. Substituting u=∇χ+J∇ψ into Eq. (2) (or SM Eq. (12) using the ε_{ik}u^k convention) yields γ∂_tχ=(B+μ)Δχ − 2K_oΔψ, γ∂_tψ=2K_oΔχ+2μΔψ. The resulting exceptional-point condition is (B−μ)²=16K_o², not B²=4K_o² used in Eqs. (4)–(5). Since the numerical threshold matches B²=4K_o², Eq. (3) appears to be the intended effective theory, but Eq. (2) as printed is not its parent equation. The derivation must be corrected.
  2. [after Eq. (1)] The statement that Eq. (1) is 'the unique covariant extension of the flat-space odd elastic tensor' is asserted without proof. On a curved background, symmetry alone allows curvature-dependent odd couplings, e.g. terms proportional to K_o R ε^{ab} or K_o Ric^{ab}ε^{cd} (with a microscopic length squared), which vanish in flat space and appear at the same derivative order as the Laplace–Beltrami operator in Eq. (3). The sphere spectrum Eq. (5), the gap ∼1/r², and the exceptional-point threshold all rely on excluding such terms. The authors should either provide a systematic derivative/curvature expansion showing that these terms are absent to the relevant order, or restate the assumption as a minimal-coupling choice.
  3. [SM footnote 2] The footnote claims that every solution of the Navier equation admits the representation u_i=∇_iχ+ε_i^j∇_jψ. This is false on a manifold with nontrivial first cohomology. On the torus, H¹(T²)≠0, so there exist nonzero harmonic vector fields (e.g., constant vector fields) with zero divergence and zero curl that are not gradients plus co-gradients of scalar potentials. These modes are absent from the ansatz used to derive Eq. (4), so the analytical torus spectrum is incomplete. The completeness assertion should be removed or restricted to the non-harmonic sector; the impact on the torus mode comparison should be assessed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2) vs SM Eq. (12)] The index notation in Eq. (2) (ε^k_i u_k) differs from that in SM Eq. (12) (ε_{ik} u^k). In flat space these differ by a sign, which affects the factor-of-two algebra discussed above. The notation should be made consistent and unambiguous throughout.
  2. [Figs. 3–4 and discussion] The defect-bound and Rayleigh modes are presented as numerical observations; the paper does not derive them from Eq. (3) or another continuum limit. A sentence stating this explicitly would avoid the impression that Eq. (3) explains these classes of modes.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The theoretical lines in Fig. 2(f) are not fully defined in the main text. Please specify the branch labels λ± and the toroidal/poloidal wavenumbers m,n in the caption or in the paragraph discussing Eq. (4).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: the covariant curved-space equations, coarse-grained moduli, and lattice numerics are independent inputs; the main predictions are not defined in terms of the quantities they are said to predict.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The microscopic model is defined by a non-reciprocal bond rule T_n = k_o(Δ_{n+1}−Δ_{n−1}) plus reciprocal springs, and SM §IV independently coarse-grains it to B=(k+6k')/(2√3), μ=√3k'/2, K_o=3k_o/2 using a standard procedure (with external reference [65]). These moduli are not fitted to the target eigenvalues; the threshold k_o^*/k=√3(1+6k'/k)/18 is obtained from the condition B=2K_o in the continuum matrix and then compared with direct diagonalization of the lattice dynamical matrix. Similarly, the sphere spectrum λ=[B+2μ±√(B²−4K_o²)]l(l+1)/(2r²) and the torus spectrum follow from Eq. (3) with no free parameters after the coarse-graining, and agree with numerical modes. The self-citations, especially [43] for the flat-lattice odd moduli, are supportive rather than definitional: the paper re-derives the moduli and the lattice spectra itself. Two non-circular caveats should be flagged. First, the statement that Eq. (1) is "the unique covariant extension of the flat-space odd elastic tensor to curved space" is asserted without proof and excludes curvature-dependent odd moduli; this is a robustness/rigor gap, not a circularity. Second, the SM footnote "every solution of the Naviers equation admits a representation like the one provided by Eq. 13" is not proved and is incomplete for surfaces with nonzero first cohomology such as the torus, so harmonic vector-field modes are omitted from the analytic torus spectrum. There is also an apparent factor-of-two algebraic mismatch between Eq. (2) and the projected Eq. (3); that is an internal-consistency/correctness concern, not a circular reduction. None of these issues makes the paper's claims equivalent to their inputs, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central theory depends on the two-metric action (§I), the claimed unique odd tensor (Eq. 1), the completeness of the Papkovich-Neuber representation (SM footnote 2), the strong tangential confinement (SM §V), and the overdamped interpretation of the lattice spectrum. No invented entities are introduced. The numerical parameters k_c/k=10^4 and k'/k=10^-4 are chosen to realize the theory's regime rather than fitted to the target results.

free parameters (4)
  • tangential confinement stiffness k_c/k = 10^4
    Chosen in SM §V to enforce in-plane motion; the central numerical results assume out-of-plane modes decouple.
  • shear-to-bulk stiffness k'/k = 10^-4
    SM §V sets k'/k=10^-4 to give small shear modulus; this weakens the transverse stiffness and affects comparison with theory.
  • odd activity k_o/k = ~1 (swept)
    Varies around 1 to scan the exceptional transition and defect/edge modes. It is the control parameter, not a fit, but the continuum threshold k_o^*/k=√3(1+6k'/k)/18 depends on coarse-grained moduli.
  • torus aspect ratio α=R/r = not specified (≫1)
    The analytical torus spectrum Eq. (4) applies only in the slender limit α≫1; the simulated α is not stated in the text.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Two-metric quadratic action expansion with passive isotropic elasticity (SM §I Eqs. 2-4)
    Standard covariant elasticity; assumed without proof in curved background.
  • ad hoc to paper The odd-elasticity tensor is uniquely given by Eq. (1) with no curvature couplings.
    Load-bearing assumption; no uniqueness proof; curvature-coupled odd moduli are omitted.
  • domain assumption Every solution of the Navier equation is representable as u_i=∇_iχ+ϵ_i^j∇_jψ (SM footnote 2)
    Equivalent to completeness of Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition; false on manifolds with nonzero first Betti number (torus), where harmonic vector fields exist.
  • domain assumption Nodal displacements are confined to the tangent plane by strong springs k_c/k=10^4 (SM §V)
    The theory ignores out-of-plane motion; if the confinement is relaxed, bending/out-of-plane modes could alter the spectrum.
  • domain assumption Overdamped interpretation of the lattice eigenmodes; first-order-in-time dynamics (main text, Fig. 2)
    The lattice equations are inertial (M u¨=-D u, SM Eq. 46), while continuum equations are overdamped; the paper assumes Im(λ) means oscillation, an interpretation-dependent step.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15189 in / 17359 out tokens · 148462 ms · 2026-08-04T06:30:42.387702+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Living materials such as membranes, cytoskeletal assemblies, cell collectives and tissues can often be described as active solids---materials that are energized from within, with elastic response about a well defined reference configuration. These materials often live in complex and curved manifolds, yet most descriptions of active solids are flat. Here, we explore the interplay between curvature and non-reciprocal elasticity via a covariant effective theory on curved manifolds in combination with numerical simulations. We find that curvature spatially patterns activity, gaps the spectrum, modifies exceptional points and introduces non-Hermitian defect modes. Together these results establish a foundation for hydrodynamic and rheological models on curved manifolds, with direct implications for living matter and active metamaterials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11037 by Corentin Coulais, Jack Binysh, Lazaros Tsaloukidis, Nikta Fakhri, Piotr Sur\'owka, Yuan Zhou, Yuchao Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Band structure of a flat honeycomb lattice. (a) A honeycomb lattice. (b) The unit cell with nonreciprocal next-nearest interactions. (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Vibrational spectra of curved systems. (a, d, g) A torus, full spherical surface, and a half-spherical cap. (b, e, h) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear isotropic odd elasticity

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A nonlinear theory of isotropic odd elasticity in 2D suppresses bifurcations in the Rivlin square while 3D Rivlin cube bifurcations persist despite the absence of linear odd elasticity in 3D.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y . Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature607, 287 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    H. Xu, Y . Huang, R. Zhang, and Y . Wu, Autonomous waves and global motion modes in living active solids, Nature Physics19, 46 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Baconnier, O

    P. Baconnier, O. Dauchot, V . D ´emery, G. D ¨uring, S. Henkes, C. Huepe, and A. Shee, Self-aligning polar active matter, Re- views of Modern Physics97, 015007 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and Y . Wu, Viscoelastic control of spatiotemporal order in bacterial active matter, Na- ture590, 80 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Baconnier, D

    P. Baconnier, D. Shohat, C. H. L ´opez, C. Coulais, V . D´emery, G. D ¨uring, and O. Dauchot, Selective and collective actuation in active solids, Nature Physics18, 1234 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    F. Gu, B. Guiselin, N. Bain, I. Zuriguel, and D. Bartolo, Emer- gence of collective oscillations in massive human crowds, Na- ture638, 112 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Maroudas-Sacks, L

    Y . Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, L. Shani-Zerbib, A. Livshits, E. Braun, and K. Keren, Topological defects in the nematic or- der of actin fibres as organization centres of Hydra morphogen- esis, Nature Physics17, 251 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Brauns, M

    F. Brauns, M. O’Leary, A. Hernandez, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Active Solids: Topological Defect Self-Propulsion Without Flow (2025), arXiv:2502.11296 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Veenstra, C

    J. Veenstra, C. Scheibner, M. Brandenbourger, J. Binysh, A. Souslov, V . Vitelli, and C. Coulais, Adaptive locomotion of active solids, Nature639, 935 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V . Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nature Reviews Physics4, 380 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    E. S. Bililign, F. Balboa Usabiaga, Y . A. Ganan, A. Poncet, V . Soni, S. Magkiriadou, M. J. Shelley, D. Bartolo, and W. T. M. Irvine, Motile dislocations knead odd crystals into whorls, Na- ture Physics18, 212 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Y . Chen, X. Li, C. Scheibner, V . Vitelli, and G. Huang, Real- ization of active metamaterials with odd micropolar elasticity, Nature Communications12, 5935 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    S. Chen, D. E. G ¨okmen, M. Fruchart, M. Krumbein, P. Sil- berzan, V . Yashunsky, and V . Vitelli, Chirality across scales in tissue dynamics (2025), arXiv:2506.12276 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Scheibner, A

    C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur ´owka, W. T. M. Irvine, and V . Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nature Physics16, 475 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Banerjee, V

    D. Banerjee, V . Vitelli, F. J ¨ulicher, and P. Sur ´owka, Active viscoelasticity of odd materials, Physical Review Letters126, 138001 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    R. Lier, J. Armas, S. Bo, C. Duclut, F. J¨ulicher, and P. Sur´owka, Passive odd viscoelasticity, Phys. Rev. E105, 054607 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Ishimoto, C

    K. Ishimoto, C. Moreau, and K. Yasuda, Odd elastohydrody- namics: Non-reciprocal living material in a viscous fluid, PRX Life1, 023002 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Sur ´owka, A

    P. Sur ´owka, A. Souslov, and D. Banerjee, Odd cosserat elastic- ity in active materials, Physical Review E108, 065003 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    S. C. Al-Izzi and G. P. Alexander, Chiral active membranes: Odd mechanics, spontaneous flows, and shape instabilities, Physical Review Research5, 043227 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Ostoja-Starzewski and P

    M. Ostoja-Starzewski and P. Sur ´owka, Generalizing odd elas- ticity theory to odd thermoelasticity for planar materials, Phys- ical Review B109, 064107 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Matus, R

    P. Matus, R. Lier, and P. Sur´owka, Molecular modelling of odd viscoelastic fluids, Physical Review E110, 044605 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Fossati, C

    M. Fossati, C. Scheibner, M. Fruchart, and V . Vitelli, Odd elas- ticity and topological waves in active surfaces, Physical Review E109, 024608 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Zhang and Z

    Y .-H. Zhang and Z. Yao, Anisotropic odd elasticity with hamil- tonian curl forces, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical57, 455204 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    L.-S. Lin, K. Yasuda, K. Ishimoto, and S. Komura, Emergence of odd elasticity in a microswimmer using deep reinforcement learning, Physical Review Research6, 033016 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    A. Lai, J. Zhou, G. Fu, and C. W. Lim, Plane odd elasticity prob- lems: Failure of saint-venant’s principle, International Journal of Solids and Structures319, 113459 (2025). 6

    2025

  26. [26]

    A. Lai, K. Wu, J. Zhou, Y . Li, and G. Fu, Nonreciprocal rotat- ing waves of odd elastic circular plates, Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 10.1007/s10338-025-00606-8 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10338-025-00606-8 2025

  27. [27]

    A. Lai, Y . Li, and K. Wu, Chiral buckling of odd elastic circular plates, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynam- ics 10.1142/S0219455426501750 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219455426501750 2025

  28. [28]

    A. Lai, J. Zhou, D. Ou, and K. Wu, Buckling of odd elastic spherical shells, Thin-Walled Structures211, 113080 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Odd active solids: vortices, velocity oscillations and dissipation-free modes, New Journal of Physics27, 054401 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    L. Quan, S. Yves, Y . Peng, H. Esfahlani, and A. Al `u, Odd Willis coupling induced by broken time-reversal symmetry, Na- ture Communications12, 2615 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Q. Wu, P. Shivashankar, X. Xu, Y . Chen, and G. Huang, Engineering nonreciprocal wave dispersion in a nonlocal micropolar metabeam, Journal of Composite Materials57, 00219983221140562 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Christensen, M

    J. Christensen, M. R. Haberman, A. Srivastava, G. Huang, and G. Shmuel, Perspective on non-hermitian elastodynamics, Ap- plied Physics Letters125, 230501 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Cohen, A

    Y . Cohen, A. Schiller, D. Wang, J. A. Dijksman, and M. Moshe, Odd-dipole screening in disordered matter, Physical Review Materials9, 065602 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Duclut, S

    C. Duclut, S. Bo, R. Lier, J. Armas, P. Sur´owka, and F. J¨ulicher, Probe particles in odd active viscoelastic fluids: How activity and dissipation determine linear stability, Physical Review E 109, 044126 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Y . Fu, H. G. E. Hentschel, P. Kaur, A. Kumar, and I. Procaccia, Odd dipole screening in radial inflation, Physical Review E110, 065003 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Wolfgram and M

    Z. Wolfgram and M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Odd elasticity of cylin- drical shells and kirchhoff–love plates under classic continuum theory, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids185, 106119 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Ostoja-Starzewski, Thermodynamic basis for odd matter, Mechanics Research Communications 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104488 (2025)

    M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Thermodynamic basis for odd matter, Mechanics Research Communications 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104488 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Walden, A

    H. Walden, A. Stegmaier, J. Dunkel, and A. Mietke, Odd elec- trical circuits (2025), arXiv:2503.14383 [cond-mat.soft]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Banerjee and P

    D. Banerjee and P. Sollich, Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy materials (2025), arXiv:2509.04693 [cond- mat.soft]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    C.-T. Lee, T. C. Lubensky, and T. Markovich, Odd elasticity in disordered chiral active materials, arXiv:2508.04468 [cond- mat.soft]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Jiang, W

    J. Jiang, W. Chen, and M. Amabili, Energy principles for non- Hermitian active metabeams with odd elasticity, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences304, 110692 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Hydrodynamics of thermal active matter, Physical Review E112, 055401 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Binysh, G

    J. Binysh, G. Baardink, J. Veenstra, C. Coulais, and A. Souslov, More is less in unpercolated active solids (2025), arXiv:2504.18362 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V . Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    R. S. Lakes, Colloquium: Materials that exceed classical ther- modynamic bounds on properties, Reviews of Modern Physics 97, 021002 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Shankar, M

    S. Shankar, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Topological sound and flocking on curved surfaces, Physical Review X7, 031039 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    F. C. Keber, E. Loiseau, T. Sanchez, S. J. DeCamp, L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, Z. Dogic, and A. R. Bausch, Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles, Science345, 1135 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    T. B. Saw, A. Doostmohammadi, V . Nier, L. Kocgozlu, S. Thampi, Y . Toyama, P. Marcq, C. T. Lim, J. M. Yeomans, and B. Ladoux, Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion, Nature544, 212 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    Efrati, E

    E. Efrati, E. Sharon, and R. Kupferman, Elastic theory of un- constrained non-Euclidean plates, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids57, 762 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Moshe, E

    M. Moshe, E. Sharon, and R. Kupferman, Elastic interactions between two-dimensional geometric defects, Physical Review E92, 062403 (2015)

    2015

  51. [51]

    S. Li, R. Zandi, and A. Travesset, Elasticity in curved topogra- phies: Exact theories and linear approximations, Physical Re- view E99, 063005 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    H. Shin, M. J. Bowick, and X. Xing, Topological defects in spherical nematics, Physical Review Letters101, 037802 (2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    Napoli and L

    G. Napoli and L. Vergori, Hydrodynamic theory for nematic shells: The interplay among curvature, flow, and alignment, Physical Review E94, 020701 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Zhang, Y

    R. Zhang, Y . Zhou, M. Rahimi, and J. J. de Pablo, Dynamic structure of active nematic shells, Nature Communications7, 13483 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Henkes, M

    S. Henkes, M. C. Marchetti, and R. Sknepnek, Dynamical pat- terns in nematic active matter on a sphere, Physical Review E 97, 042605 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    K. He, Y . Zhou, and H. Ramezani-Dakhel, From nematic shells to nematic droplets: energetics and defect transitions, Soft Mat- ter18, 1395 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Napoli, O

    G. Napoli, O. V . Pylypovskyi, D. D. Sheka, and L. Vergori, Ne- matic shells: new insights in topology- and curvature-induced effects, Soft Matter17, 10322 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Wittmann, L

    R. Wittmann, L. B. G. Cortes, H. L¨owen, and D. G. A. L. Aarts, Particle-resolved topological defects of smectic colloidal liquid crystals in extreme confinement, Nature Communications12, 623 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    P. G. Ciarlet,Theory of Shells(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    R. D. Kamien, The geometry of soft materials: a primer, Re- views of Modern Physics74, 953 (2002)

    2002

  61. [61]

    M. J. Bowick and L. Giomi, Two-dimensional matter: order, curvature and defects, Advances in Physics58, 449 (2009)

    2009

  62. [62]

    Y .-C. Chao, S. Gokhale, L. Lin, A. Hastewell, A. Bacanu, Y . Chen, J. Li, J. Liu, H. Lee, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Selec- tive excitation of work-generating cycles in nonreciprocal living solids (2024), arXiv:2410.18017 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    D. M. Sussman, Interplay of curvature and rigidity in shape- based models of confluent tissue, Physical Review Research2, 023417 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Brandst ¨atter, D

    T. Brandst ¨atter, D. B. Br ¨uckner, Y . L. Han, R. Alert, M. Guo, and C. P. Broedersz, Curvature induces active velocity waves in rotating spherical tissues, Nature Communications14, 1643 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    T. C. Lubensky, C. L. Kane, X. Mao, A. Souslov, and K. Sun, Phonons and elasticity in critically coordinated lattices, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 073901 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    Veenstra, J

    J. Veenstra, J. Binysh, V . Seinen, R. Naber, D. Robledo- Poisson, A. Hunt, W. v. Saarloos, A. Souslov, and C. Coulais, Wave coarsening drives time crystallization in active solids (2025), arXiv:2508.20052 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Vitelli, J

    V . Vitelli, J. B. Lucks, and D. R. Nelson, Crystallography on curved surfaces, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences USA103, 12323 (2006). 7

    2006

  68. [68]

    Tsaloukidis, J

    L. Tsaloukidis, J. J. Fern ´andez-Melgarejo, J. Molina-Vilaplana, and P. Sur´owka, Fracton-elasticity duality on curved manifolds, Physical Review B109, 085427 (2024)

    2024

  69. [69]

    Moon and D

    P. Moon and D. E. Spencer,Field Theory Handbook: Includ- ing Coordinate Systems, Differential Equations and Their Solu- tions, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988)

    1988

  70. [70]

    Braverman, C

    L. Braverman, C. Scheibner, B. VanSaders, and V . Vitelli, Topo- logical defects in solids with odd elasticity, Physical Review Letters127, 268001 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    K. Sone, Y . Ashida, and T. Sagawa, Exceptional non-Hermitian topological edge mode and its application to active matter, Na- ture Communications11, 5745 (2020)

    2020

  72. [72]

    E. Tang, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Topology pro- tects chiral edge currents in stochastic systems, Physical Re- view X11, 031015 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Scholz, M

    C. Scholz, M. Engel, and T. P ¨oschel, Rotating robots move collectively and self-organize, Nature Communications9, 931 (2018)

    2018

  74. [74]

    (B−µ) ∇juj + Kop |g| ϵjk ∇juk # − ∇ 2 j

    Q. Yang, H. Zhu, P. Liu, R. Liu, Q. Shi, K. Chen, N. Zheng, F. Ye, and M. Yang, Topologically protected transport of cargo in a chiral active fluid aided by odd-viscosity-enhanced deple- tion interactions, Physical Review Letters126, 198001 (2021). 1 Supplementary Material: Curved Odd Elasticity I. Odd elasticity in curved background Elasticity on curved ...

    2021