pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.11292 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM

CPI-C: Cool Planet Imaging Coronagraph on Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope

Jiangpei Dou , Xi Zhang , Gang Zhao , Mingming Xu , Zhen Wu , Gang Wang , Baoning Yuan , Lingyi Kong
show 18 more authors
Yiming Zhu Bingli Niu Zhonghua Lv Yongjun Qi Shu Jiang Bo Chen Wei Guo Di Wang Yinglu Lin Liping Zheng Jing Guo Ruokun Li Liyan Xu Huihai Wu Cheng Wen Shuwei Miao Boyang Lv Weimiao Li
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords cool exoplanetsdirect imagingcoronagraphhigh contrast imagingvisible lightspace telescopeplanet characterizationCSST
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

CPI-C on the CSST will be the first space instrument to directly image reflected visible light from cool exoplanets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes the Cool Planet Imaging Coronagraph (CPI-C) to be mounted on the Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope for direct imaging surveys of Neptune- to Jupiter-sized planets around solar-type stars within 40 parsecs at 0.5 to 5 AU separations. It relies on step-transmission apodization to suppress pupil diffraction and precise phase correction to remove speckles from optical imperfections, aiming for contrast better than 10 to the minus 8 at an inner working angle of 3 to 4 wavelengths over diameter in the 600 to 900 nanometer visible band. The design enables high-precision multi-band photometry to extract physical parameters including effective temperature, surface gravity, radius, and mass. These observations would supply data on how such planets form and evolve while serving as a technical pathfinder for later missions targeting Earth-like worlds.

Core claim

CPI-C is the first space-based coronagraph designed to capture the reflected visible light from cool exoplanets, using step-transmission apodization and precise phase correction on the CSST telescope to reach contrast better than 10^{-8} at 3-4 λ/D from 600 to 900 nm, thereby permitting multi-band photometric spectroscopy that yields effective temperature, surface gravity, radius, mass, and related parameters for planets at 0.5-5 AU.

What carries the argument

The step-transmission apodization combined with precise phase correction that suppresses diffraction from the telescope pupil and speckles from surface errors to deliver the required 10^{-8} contrast at 3-4 λ/D.

If this is right

  • Systematic direct imaging surveys of Neptune- to Jupiter-like exoplanets around nearby solar-type stars at 0.5-5 AU.
  • High-precision multi-band photometry providing spectroscopic characterization of detected planets.
  • Derivation of key physical parameters including effective temperature, surface gravity, radius, and mass.
  • New constraints on the formation and evolution mechanisms of cool giant planets.
  • Technical foundation for confirming Earth-twins with future space flagship missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The resulting catalog could yield the first statistical sample of cool-planet occurrence rates and orbital architectures inaccessible to current facilities.
  • Photometric bands may reveal basic atmospheric or surface properties as a byproduct of the parameter extraction.
  • The same contrast approach could be tested for adaptation on other planned space telescopes.
  • Success would narrow the technical gap between current high-contrast imaging and the requirements for habitable-zone Earth analogs.

Load-bearing premise

The step-transmission apodization and phase correction will actually reach the needed contrast better than 10^{-8} at 3-4 lambda/D on the real CSST telescope in visible light.

What would settle it

Ground or on-orbit calibration data showing that residual speckles or diffraction prevent contrast from reaching 10^{-8} at 3-4 λ/D in the 600-900 nm band.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11292 by Baoning Yuan, Bingli Niu, Bo Chen, Boyang Lv, Cheng Wen, Di Wang, Gang Wang, Gang Zhao, Huihai Wu, Jiangpei Dou, Jing Guo, Lingyi Kong, Liping Zheng, Liyan Xu, Mingming Xu, Ruokun Li, Shu Jiang, Shuwei Miao, Wei Guo, Weimiao Li, Xi Zhang, Yiming Zhu, Yinglu Lin, Yongjun Qi, Zhen Wu, Zhonghua Lv.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic layout of the CPI-C instrument. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The detection capability of the direct imaging of cool planets for the CPI-C mission. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Here we classify star candidates into the most high priority (MHP), high priority (HP), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: RV fitting results of HD 39091 (π Men) b using AAT and HARPS data (Gandolfi et al. 2018; Hatzes et al. 2022). Middle: With one hypothetical direct imaging measurement (black square), orbital fitting yields two distinct orbital solutions (blue and orange) that differ in their projected orientations but both pass through the observed position. The arrow indicates the posi￾tion of the perigee, and the h… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A simulated image of CPI-C observation, and an artificial planet can be seen in dark hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Simulated reflected-light spectrum of a Jupiter-like planet. The blue curve shows the theoretical albedo spectrum, while black points with error bars represent mock CPI-C observations in optical bands. The orange curves correspond to spectral realizations drawn from the posterior distribution of the MCMC retrieval, illustrating the range of models consistent with the data. Right: Posterior distributi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Minimum contrast required for CPI-C to detect exoplanets of different sizes (1, 1.5, 2 Jupiter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CPI-C optics layout. the telescope focus, provides the reference wavefront for both the low-order wavefront sensing by CPI-C’s Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and the high-order sensing at its focal plane. The incident light is subsequently collimated by the OAP1 mirror (Off-Axis Paraboloid 1), which establishes the first pupil plane on the TTM. Furthermore, the exit pupil of the telescope must be conjugat… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The simulation of the SH-WFS image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: A 31-step transmission pupil apodized filter. Right: the theoretical imaging contrast [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The theoretical imaging contrast in the Infrared Band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The static contrast of 10−6 at IWA of 3λ/D with 0.03λ RMS phase aberration, and the contrast after the dark hole optimization. 4.2 Performance Evaluation To obtain better than 10−8 image contrast, CPI-C firstly needs to record the reference wavefront, and calibrate TTM and DM influence function by using the internal laser source. Then, switch to the telescope light. The SH-WFS detects the low/middle-order… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Apparent geometric albedo spectra of Jupiter (red) and Neptune (blue) over 0.5–1.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Schematic diagram of M5 structure. near-infrared bands extend the coverage into the Y window (1.0–1.1,µm) and sample the broad 1.4,µm H2O/CH4 feature with flanking continuum reference bands (1.26 and 1.53,µm). This de￾sign ensures that the retrieved spectra can disentangle molecular absorption from continuum level, thereby constraining Teff, log g, atmospheric composition, and planetary radius when combin… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Internal Layout Diagram of M5. 4.4 Mechanics, configuration and thermal control M5 (as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The optical system of CPI-C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Schematic diagram of M6 structure. exactly in its pupil. The focal points insert occulting masks. Two Beam splitters split the optical path into three beams: one is visible light observation, another is infrared observation, and the third is wavelength sensing. M6, serving as the CPSU, is securely connected to the telescope via four titanium alloy interface points (A, B, C, D). It primarily consists of an… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Internal Layout Diagram of M6. alloy frame forms an internal cavity. Each unit is fixed to the aluminum alloy frame with screws. Light from M5 enters the interior of M6 through the entrance aperture and finally enters the inside of the camera. On the lower side of the module, heat is transferred to the evaporator mounting surface on the upper via heat pipes. The upper-side units dissipate heat primarily t… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: M5 heat dissipation channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The thermal math model generated temperature maps of the coronagraph optical bench. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: CPI-C’s thermal balance test layout diagram and temperature curves of the CPI-C’s optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: It comprises a silicone rubber core enclosed within a stainless-steel shell. The stainless￾steel shell serves to adjust the compression of the silicone rubber and provides physical limit protection when the vibration amplitude becomes excessive. As the compression of the silicone rubber changes, its stiffness exhibits a nonlinear response: at low compression levels, the stiffness is minimal, under on-orbi… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Left: CPI-C module micro-vibration test site. Right: Micro-vibration test results on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: shows the block diagram of the CPI-C system and its electronics. The CPI-C aims to detect faint exoplanets around bright star. Diffraction occurs when starlight passes through the telescope aperture, and static wavefront errors from the system’s optical surfaces generate speckle noise. The diffraction pattern and speckle noise can overwhelm the signal of a planet. Diffracted light in the system’s Point Sp… view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Information flow of CPI-C. wavefront errors using a DM. After effectively suppressing diffracted photon noise and speckle noise, high-contrast imaging can be achieved in specific regions of the PSF. The integrated control unit of the CPI-C receives command injections (e.g., data instructions and calibration files) from the telescope via the 1553B bus. It then distributes control commands to internal subsy… view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: The cumulative number of targets observed within each time window was obtained using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Schematic diagram of the ADI-based speckle removal algorithm for CPI-C data. Step 1: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cool Planet Imaging Coronagraph (CPI-C) on Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST) is proposed to direct image the cool planets around nearby solar-type stars (within 40 pc). The core scientific objective of CPI-C is to conduct high-contrast directly imaging surveys of exoplanets ranging in size from Neptune-like to Jupiter-like, located at separations of 0.5 to 5 AU from their host stars, and to perform systematic spectroscopic analysis of the detected planets through high-precision multi-band photometry. CPI-C employs a step-transmission apodization technique to suppress the diffraction noises from the telescope pupil and a precise phase correction technique to eliminate the speckle noises due to imperfections of the optical surfaces. The contrast requirement is better than $10^{-8}$ at an inner working angle (IWA) of $3-4\lambda/D$, in the visible wavelength from 600 nm to 900 nm. CPI-C will be the first space-based instrument capable of directly imaging the reflection light from the cool exoplanets in the visible wavelength enabling the measurement of key physical parameters such as the effective temperature, surface gravity, radius, mass, and other key parameters. The potential observation results will significantly contribute to further understand the formation and evolution mechanisms of planets, which will also lay a solid foundation for future confirmation of the Earth-twins in the next generation space flagship missions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Cool Planet Imaging Coronagraph (CPI-C) for the Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST). CPI-C is designed to directly image Neptune- to Jupiter-sized cool exoplanets at 0.5–5 AU around nearby solar-type stars (<40 pc) in reflected visible light (600–900 nm) using step-transmission apodization to suppress pupil diffraction and precise phase correction to remove speckles, targeting contrast better than 10^{-8} at an inner working angle of 3–4 λ/D. The instrument would enable multi-band photometric spectroscopy to measure effective temperature, surface gravity, radius, mass, and other parameters, positioning CPI-C as the first space-based visible-light coronagraph for such planets and contributing to planet formation studies.

Significance. If the stated contrast performance is achieved on the actual CSST optics, the instrument would provide the first direct reflected-light imaging and characterization of cool exoplanets in the visible, filling a critical gap between current infrared direct-imaging facilities and future flagship missions. This would yield new constraints on planetary physical properties and formation pathways for a population not accessible to transit or radial-velocity methods alone.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and design description: The central performance requirement (contrast <10^{-8} at 3–4 λ/D in 600–900 nm) is asserted to be met by step-transmission apodization plus phase correction, yet the manuscript supplies no end-to-end simulations, wavefront-error budget, or laboratory results that incorporate the CSST pupil geometry, segment phasing errors, or on-orbit thermal environment. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed scientific capability.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'other key parameters' in the abstract is vague; specify which additional quantities (e.g., albedo, atmospheric composition) would be accessible via the multi-band photometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of CPI-C's scientific value and for the constructive major comment. We agree that the contrast performance claim requires stronger supporting analysis in the manuscript and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and design description: The central performance requirement (contrast <10^{-8} at 3–4 λ/D in 600–900 nm) is asserted to be met by step-transmission apodization plus phase correction, yet the manuscript supplies no end-to-end simulations, wavefront-error budget, or laboratory results that incorporate the CSST pupil geometry, segment phasing errors, or on-orbit thermal environment. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed scientific capability.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript presents the contrast target as a design goal based on the established principles of step-transmission apodization (which suppresses diffraction from the pupil) and active phase correction (to control speckles), without providing a full end-to-end simulation or detailed wavefront-error budget that folds in the segmented CSST primary, on-orbit thermal drifts, or segment phasing residuals. These elements are indeed central to validating the 10^{-8} contrast at 3–4 λ/D. In the revised version we will add a new subsection in the instrument description that (1) summarizes a preliminary wavefront-error budget drawing on published CSST optical specifications and typical space-environment allocations, (2) references laboratory demonstrations of step-transmission apodizers achieving comparable raw contrast in visible light, and (3) explicitly states that a complete CSST-specific end-to-end simulation campaign is planned as part of the subsequent detailed design phase. We will also tone down the abstract to present the contrast as the required performance target rather than an already-demonstrated capability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; forward design proposal with externally set targets

full rationale

The manuscript is an instrument proposal document. It states scientific objectives, describes the chosen techniques (step-transmission apodization and phase correction), and lists contrast requirements as design goals rather than deriving them from equations or data fits. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on stated performance targets and the assertion that the instrument will be the first of its kind, none of which reduce to self-definition or prior author work by construction. The derivation chain is therefore empty and self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions about optical performance of coronagraphs and wavefront control; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Step-transmission apodization and phase correction can suppress diffraction and speckle to the stated contrast levels on a space telescope
    Invoked to meet the 10^{-8} contrast target at the given IWA.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1230 out tokens · 39278 ms · 2026-05-16T23:19:48.891833+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2010, in Proc

    Absil, O., Defrère, D., Roberge, A., et al. 2010, in Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 7734, Proc of SPIE, ed. W. C. Danchi, F. Delplancke, & J. K. Rajagopal, 77340L 13

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    2011, A&A, 527, C4 12

    Absil, O., den Hartog, R., Gondoin, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, C4 12

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    2023, in ASP Conference Series, Vol

    Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in ASP Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423 12

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 3113 4, 14

    Bai, L., Gu, S., Wang, X., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3113 4, 14

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05880 14

    Bamberger, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05880 14

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16761 11 Bardalez Gagliuffi, D

    Bao, C., Ji, J., Zhao, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16761 11 Bardalez Gagliuffi, D. C., Faherty, J. K., Li, Y., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, L43 10

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    F., McArthur, B

    Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Nelan, E. P., & Bean, J. L. 2023, AJ, 166, 27 10

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    L., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., et al

    Beuzit, J. L., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A155 6

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    2022, A&A, 667, A165 7

    Boccaletti, A., Cossou, C., Baudoz, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A165 7

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    2012, A&A, 545, A55 10

    Boisse, I., Pepe, F., Perrier, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A55 10

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    A., Udalski, A., Jaroszyński, M., et al

    Bond, I. A., Udalski, A., Jaroszyński, M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 606, L155 2

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Boss, A. P. 2002, ApJ, 567, L149 15

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    Bowler, B. P. 2016, PASP, 128, 102001 6

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    P., Dupuy, T

    Bowler, B. P., Dupuy, T. J., Endl, M., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 159 3, 9, 10

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    M., Brandt, T

    Brandt, G. M., Brandt, T. D., Dupuy, T. J., Michalik, D., & Marleau, G.-D. 2021, ApJ, 915, L16 15

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Brandt, T. D. 2018, ApJS, 239, 31 9

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Brandt, T. D. 2021, ApJS, 254, 42 4, 11

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    D., Dupuy, T

    Brandt, T. D., Dupuy, T. J., & Bowler, B. P. 2019, AJ, 158, 140 3, 11 38 J.-P. Dou et al

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    A., & Burrows, C

    Brown, R. A., & Burrows, C. J. 1990, Icarus, 87, 484 17

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    B., Lunine, J

    Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. 2001, RMP, 73, 719 6, 10

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    L., Hinkley, S., Kammerer, J., et al

    Carter, A. L., Hinkley, S., Kammerer, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, L20 7

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    M., Latham, D

    Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. 2000, ApJ, 529, L45 2

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    2015, A&A, 581, A38 10

    Courcol, B., Bouchy, F., Pepe, F., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A38 10

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    2025, Measurement, 251, 117206 30

    Cui, H., Xu, M., & Dou, J. 2025, Measurement, 251, 117206 30

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    2015, ApJ, 814, L27 15

    Currie, T., Cloutier, R., Brittain, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, L27 15

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    2011, ApJ, 729, 128 15

    Currie, T., Burrows, A., Itoh, Y., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 128 15

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    M., Brandt, T

    Currie, T., Brandt, G. M., Brandt, T. D., et al. 2023, Science, 380, 198 4, 11

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    2025, Journal of Imaging, 11, 203 20

    Dou, J., Niu, B., Zhao, G., et al. 2025, Journal of Imaging, 11, 203 20

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    2010, RAA, 10, 189 2

    Dou, J.-P., Ren, D.-Q., & Zhu, Y.-T. 2010, RAA, 10, 189 2

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    2011, RAA, 11, 198 2, 3

    Dou, J.-P., Ren, D.-Q., & Zhu, Y.-T. 2011, RAA, 11, 198 2, 3

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    2016, ApJ, 832, 84 2, 3, 7, 17

    Dou, J., & Ren, D. 2016, ApJ, 832, 84 2, 3, 7, 17

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 12 2, 6, 36

    Dou, J., Ren, D., Zhao, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 12 2, 6, 36

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    2014, in Proc of SPIE, Vol

    Dou, J., Ren, D., Zhang, X., et al. 2014, in Proc of SPIE, Vol. 9147, 91478O 3

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    J., Cochran, W

    Endl, M., Brugamyer, E. J., Cochran, W. D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 34 10

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    2020, AJ, 159, 177 13

    Ertel, S., Defrère, D., Hinz, P., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 177 13

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    2009, ApJ, 703, 1545 10

    Fischer, D., Driscoll, P., Isaacson, H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1545 10

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 16

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    2015, ApJ, 815, L21 12

    Fung, J., & Dong, R. 2015, ApJ, 815, L21 12

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    H., et al

    Gandolfi, D., Barragán, O., Livingston, J. H., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, L10 10, 11

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    C., & Fischer, D

    Gregory, P. C., & Fischer, D. A. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 731 10

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    A., Kuchner, M

    Guyon, O., Pluzhnik, E. A., Kuchner, M. J., Collins, B., & Ridgway, S. T. 2006, ApJS, 167, 81 2

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    P., Gandolfi, D., Korth, J., et al

    Hatzes, A. P., Gandolfi, D., Korth, J., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 223 10, 11

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    2025, Progress in Astronomy, 43, 100 4

    Huang, J., Wang, X., & Dou, J. 2025, Progress in Astronomy, 43, 100 4

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    2022, RAA, 22, 072003 2, 11

    Ji, J.-H., Li, H.-T., Zhang, J.-B., et al. 2022, RAA, 22, 072003 2, 11

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    2024, CJSS, 44, 193 2

    Ji, J., Li, H., Zhang, J., et al. 2024, CJSS, 44, 193 2

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Jones, H. R. A., Butler, R. P., Tinney, C. G., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1703 10

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    R., Chiang, E., et al

    Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1345 7

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    A., & Jucks, K

    Kaltenegger, L., Traub, W. A., & Jucks, K. W. 2007, ApJ, 658, 598 2

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    J., Bailey, V

    Kasdin, N. J., Bailey, V. P., Mennesson, B., et al. 2020, in Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 11443, Proc of SPIE, ed. M. Lystrup & M. D. Perrin, 114431U 7

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    2025, Shock VIB, 2025, 5575921 25

    Kong, L., Dou, J., Guo, W., et al. 2025, Shock VIB, 2025, 5575921 25

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 271 15 CPI-C on CSST 39

    Kratter, K., & Lodato, G. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 271 15 CPI-C on CSST 39

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    E., Beichman, C

    Krist, J. E., Beichman, C. A., Trauger, J. T., et al. 2007, in Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 6693, Proc of SPIE, ed. D. R. Coulter, 66930H 7

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    2019, AJ, 157, 132 3

    Lacy, B., Shlivko, D., & Burrows, A. 2019, AJ, 157, 132 3

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    2007, ApJ, 660, 770 6, 35

    Lafreniere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., & Artigau, E. 2007, ApJ, 660, 770 6, 35

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    M., Bonavita, M., et al

    Lannier, J., Lagrange, A. M., Bonavita, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A54 9

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    2020, RAA, 20, 164 2

    Liu, B., & Ji, J. 2020, RAA, 20, 164 2

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    J., Ruffio, J.-B., et al

    Llop-Sayson, J., Wang, J. J., Ruffio, J.-B., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 181 10

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Lovelock, J. E. 1965, Nature, 207, 568 2

    work page 1965

  59. [59]

    Lovelock, J. E. 1975, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY Series B, 189, 167 2

    work page 1975

  60. [60]

    K., Bastien, F

    Luhn, J. K., Bastien, F. A., Wright, J. T., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 149 10

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    G., & Clampin, M

    Lyon, R. G., & Clampin, M. 2012, OE, 51, 011002 17

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    R., Ingraham, P., et al

    Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Ingraham, P., et al. 2014, PNAS, 111, 12661 6

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    R., Barman, T., et al

    Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Barman, T., et al. 2015, Science, 350, 64 2

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    S., Fortney, J

    Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541 15

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    2006, ApJ, 641, 556 6, 35

    Marois, C., Lafreniere, D., Doyon, R., Macintosh, B., & Nadeau, D. 2006, ApJ, 641, 556 6, 35

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    2008, Science, 322, 1348 2, 15

    Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1348 2, 15

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    M., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T

    Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Konopacky, Q. M., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T. 2010, Nature, 468, 1080 2

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    J., et al

    Mawet, D., Hirsch, L., Lee, E. J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 33 10

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    1995, Nature, 378, 355 2

    Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355 2

    work page 1995

  70. [70]

    2018, in Handbook of Exoplanets, ed

    Mordasini, C. 2018, in Handbook of Exoplanets, ed. H. J. Deeg & J. A. Belmonte, 143 15

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    K., Pogorelyuk, L., et al

    Morgan, R., Vlahakis, S. K., Pogorelyuk, L., et al. 2021, in Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 11823, Proc of SPIE, ed. S. B. Shaklan & G. J. Ruane, 118230F 11

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    E., Ford, E

    Nelson, B. E., Ford, E. B., Wright, J. T., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 442 10

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    D., Plavchan, P., Burt, J., et al

    Newman, P. D., Plavchan, P., Burt, J., et al. 2022, in Bulletin of the AAS, Vol. 54, 102.226 9

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    L., De Rosa, R

    Nielsen, E. L., De Rosa, R. J., Macintosh, B., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 13 6

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    2002, ApJ, 576, 870 5, 15

    Padoan, P., & Nordlund, Å. 2002, ApJ, 576, 870 5, 15

    work page 2002

  76. [76]

    H., Buie, M

    Parker, A. H., Buie, M. W., Grundy, W. M., & Noll, K. S. 2016, ApJ, 825, L9 4

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Pepe, F., Correia, A. C. M., Mayor, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 462, 769 10

    work page 2007

  78. [78]

    A., Youdin, A

    Piso, A.-M. A., Youdin, A. N., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2015, ApJ, 800, 82 15

    work page 2015

  79. [79]

    E., Kane, S

    Plavchan, P., Berberian, Jr, J. E., Kane, S. R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.02039 11

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al

    Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 5, 15

    work page 1996

Showing first 80 references.