Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A Wigner crystal's periodic potential can halve exciton diffusion in a MoSe2 monolayer even though it barely shifts exciton energies.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:24 UTC pith:JDYG4XVF

load-bearing objection A fresh and testable prediction that a Wigner crystal slows exciton diffusion, but the two-fold magnitude is exponentially sensitive to an unreported localization length — worth refereeing, not yet convincing. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.13512 v1 pith:JDYG4XVF submitted 2025-12-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Impact of an electron Wigner crystal on exciton propagation

Daniel Erkensten , Alexey Chernikov , Ermin Malic This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Wigner crystalexciton diffusionexciton band flatteningcharge-ordered statesmonolayer MoSe2exciton-electron interactiontwo-dimensional semiconductors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper predicts that when electrons in a monolayer MoSe2 freeze into a Wigner crystal, the periodic potential they create—though too weak to shift exciton energies by more than a fraction of a millielectronvolt—markedly changes how excitons move. The central claim is that this potential flattens the exciton band structure inside the crystal's mini-Brillouin zone, suppressing the group velocity that carries excitons, so the diffusion coefficient falls from about 1 cm²/s to roughly 0.5 cm²/s at an electron density of 10^11 cm^-2. As density rises, electrons delocalize, bands become more parabolic, and diffusion climbs back to the free-exciton limit. Because this density dependence is the opposite of what ordinary exciton-electron scattering produces, the low-density drop is put forward as a measurable hallmark of Wigner crystallization. The result matters because it ties strongly correlated electronic order to exciton transport, with no external lattice needed.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the mean-field potential of a Wigner crystal's periodically ordered electrons creates exciton subbands via zone folding, and that the lowest subband flattens at the mini-Brillouin zone edges. At low carrier densities, where the electron localization length ξ is much smaller than the Wigner lattice constant a_W, the flattening is strong; the authors trace this to a scaling ξ/a_W ∝ n_e^{1/8}. The flattening quenches exciton group velocities at momenta that are thermally occupied, and this, not scattering, dominates the density dependence of diffusion. The result is a predicted twofold drop in D at n_e ≈ 10^11 cm^-2 and a monotonic recovery toward ≈1 cm²/s

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mean-field exciton Hamiltonian H = Σ_Q E_Q X†_Q X_Q + Σ_{q,Q} V_{x-e}(q) ρ_e(q) X†_{Q+q} X_Q, where ρ_e(q) is the periodic charge density of the Wigner lattice (a sum of Gaussians with localization length ξ). The exciton-electron interaction is replaced by a contact value v_{x-e} ≈ −0.2 eV nm², and ξ is obtained by minimizing the Hartree energy of the electron lattice; this yields ξ/a_W ∝ n_e^{1/8}. Diagonalizing the Hamiltonian in the Wigner mini-Brillouin zone produces the subbands whose flattening is the effect. Diffusion is computed with the Wigner-function/relaxation-time formula D = 1/2 Σ_η ∫ d²Q τ^η_Q (v^η_Q)² N^η_Q, with phonon-limited relaxation times.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted two-fold slowdown rests on treating the Wigner crystal as a static triangular lattice of Gaussian electron blobs whose localization length comes from a Hartree variational calculation, and replacing the full exciton-electron interaction with a momentum-independent contact value; if the real interaction at the relevant reciprocal-lattice momenta is weaker or electron quantum fluctuations smear the periodic density, the band flattening is overestimated.

What would settle it

Measure the exciton diffusion coefficient in an hBN-encapsulated MoSe2 monolayer at T = 4 K as a function of electron density between 10^11 and 10^12 cm^-2. If D does not rise with density in the Wigner-crystal regime, or if the value at the lowest density exceeds ~0.7 cm²/s, the static-Gaussian-lattice and contact-interaction treatment overestimates the periodic potential. Alternatively, resonant pump-probe imaging of the spatial exciton profile could resolve the predicted subband flattening at the mini-Brillouin zone edge.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At T = 4 K and n_e = 10^11 cm^-2, the diffusion coefficient is predicted to drop to roughly half its free-exciton value, a change large enough for transport measurements to resolve.
  • Diffusion increases monotonically with density toward the free-exciton limit, opposite to the decrease expected from scattering off a Fermi sea of free electrons.
  • At T = 8 and 12 K, diffusion becomes non-monotonic in density, with a minimum that shifts with temperature as higher subbands become thermally populated.
  • The same zone-folding and relaxation-time scheme applies to any periodic charge-ordered state, so the framework extends to generalized Wigner crystals and possibly Mott-insulating phases.
  • The predictions hold only while the Wigner crystal is stable; melting, not included in the model, is expected only for n_e ≳ 5×10^11 cm^-2.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted monotonic rise of D with density holds, it also implies that any electronic order with a periodic potential—not just Wigner crystals—should generically slow excitons at low densities, so measuring D alone may not identify the order type; combined with the density exponent of the rise it could.
  • Because the band flattening relies on the contact approximation for V_{x-e}(q), a momentum-resolved measurement of the umklapp subband splitting (which the authors show matches experimental resonance energies) would be a direct test; a discrepancy would indicate the contact value overestimates the coupling at reciprocal-lattice momenta.
  • The harmonic-oscillator mapping predicts that the exciton Wannier width scales as a_x ∝ ξ ∝ n_e^{-3/8}; imaging exciton wavefunction extent as a function of density could verify this scaling without needing transport.
  • At higher temperatures where the Wigner crystal melts, the model predicts a qualitative crossover from the non-monotonic D to free-electron scattering behavior; observing the crossover temperature could help bracket the experimental melting line.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. Erkensten, Chernikov, and Malic present a mean-field theory for the center-of-mass motion of excitons in monolayer MoSe2 in the presence of a triangular electron Wigner crystal. The exciton-Wigner-electron interaction is treated as a contact potential with strength v_x-e = -0.2 eV nm^2, and the electron density is replaced by a periodic sum of Gaussians of width ξ. Zone-folding of the exciton Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) yields subbands whose flattening at the mini-Brillouin-zone boundary suppresses group velocities. Using a Wigner-function/relaxation-time expression for the diffusion coefficient (Eq. 2) with microscopically computed exciton-phonon scattering, the authors predict D ≈ 0.5 cm^2/s at n_e = 10^11 cm^-2 versus ~1 cm^2/s for free excitons, a monotonic increase of D with density at T = 4 K, and a nonmonotonic density dependence at 8–12 K due to thermal population of higher subbands. They contrast this with Fermi-sea exciton transport, which decreases with density.

Significance. The proposed mechanism is physically plausible and, if quantitatively reliable, would provide a transport-based signature of Wigner crystallization that is distinct from the previously studied optical/umklapp signatures. The paper's strengths are its material-specific input (masses, deformation potentials, dielectric parameters), the reproduction of the measured umklapp splitting ΔE ≈ 0.5 meV, and the explicit treatment of phonon scattering in the zone-folded basis. The prediction is falsifiable by spatially resolved photoluminescence diffusion experiments on hBN-encapsulated MoSe2 at cryogenic temperatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM Section II, Eq. (S13); Fig. 3] The headline two-fold decrease in D is controlled by the Fourier components W(g) = v_x-e exp(-g^2 ξ^2 / 2) / A_W. The manuscript only reports the scaling ξ/a_W ∝ n_e^{1/8} and never reports the numerical minimized ξ/a_W values or the resulting W(g). At n_e = 10^11 cm^-2, g a_W ≈ 7.26; changing ξ/a_W from 0.2 to 0.3 changes exp(-g^2 ξ^2 / 2) from ~0.35 to ~0.09, i.e., the periodic potential and the band flattening change by nearly a factor of four. Without the actual ξ values and a sensitivity sweep (e.g., ξ/a_W = 0.1–0.4) showing D versus n_e, the central quantitative claim is not secured. Please report the minimized localization lengths, benchmark the Gaussian ansatz against quantum Monte Carlo or experimental Lindemann estimates, and test the sensitivity.
  2. [SM Section I, Eq. (1)] The use of a momentum-independent contact interaction V_x-e(q) = v_x-e is justified from the long-wavelength limit q → 0. The relevant umklapp couplings involve g with g a_x ≈ 0.3 at n_e = 10^11 cm^-2, and higher shells have larger q; this is not deep in the q a_x << 1 regime. Since the band flattening is generated by the periodic W(g), a q-dependent V_x-e(q) at these momenta could substantially weaken the effect. Please evaluate the full microscopic expression (S1)–(S3) at q = g or provide a numerical estimate of its reduction relative to the contact value.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The diffusion expression lacks an explicit normalization and integration measure. Please specify how N_Q^η is normalized (e.g., a Boltzmann distribution with a partition function) and whether the mBZ integral includes the (2π)^-2 phase-space factor.
  2. [Fig. 2] The band structure is described as a 'horizontal cut' of the mini-Brillouin zone, but the specific path is not labeled. Please specify the symmetry line (e.g., Γ–M–Γ or similar) and add axis units.
  3. [SM Section VI] The Fermi-sea comparison uses δ = 0.2 meV, calibrated so that D at n_e = 10^11 cm^-2 matches the free-exciton value. This calibration is not equivalent to any parameter in the Wigner-crystal model. It would help to state this explicitly in the main text and to comment on how the qualitative comparison would change if δ were varied outside the range shown in Fig. S1.
  4. [SM Section IV] The text states that the exciton wave-function width a_x is 'of similar order of magnitude' as the Wigner lattice constant. Given the input parameters, a_x ∝ ξ with prefactor ≈0.86, and if ξ is a fraction of a_W ≈ 34 nm, a_x may be several times smaller than a_W. A quantitative statement with the actual ξ values would be more precise.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] Typo: 'functon' should be 'function'.
  6. [General] The authors correctly note that Wigner-crystal melting is not included. A brief comment on how thermal fluctuations would broaden the Gaussian density profile and hence reduce W(g) would help set the validity range of the prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Wigner-crystal diffusion prediction is computed from independent inputs, not fitted to the predicted output.

full rationale

The central Wigner-crystal diffusion curve is obtained by diagonalizing the exciton-Wigner Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) to get renormalized bands, then evaluating the diffusion coefficient via Eq. (2). The only periodic-potential input is W(g) = v_{x-e} rho_e(g) (SM Eq. S13), built from v_{x-e} ≈ −0.2 eV nm², which is computed from Eq. (S6) using literature polarizability and a microscopically computed exciton Bohr radius, and from the localization length ξ found by minimizing the Hartree energy (SM Eq. S10). No parameter in this chain is fitted to the predicted diffusion coefficients or to experimental diffusion data. The Fermi-sea comparison curve does use a broadening δ = 0.2 meV chosen so that the lowest-density Fermi-sea point matches the free-exciton D, but that calibration only anchors the comparison curve; it does not determine the Wigner-crystal prediction. Self-citations to prior moiré-exciton-phonon scattering formalism and to Wigner-crystal stability work are methodological or regime-setting, not the source of the predicted two-fold drop. The reviewer concern that unreported ξ/a_W values control the exponential suppression of W(g) is a quantitative robustness issue, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new entities. It relies on five stated approximations: contact exciton-electron coupling, static Gaussian Wigner electron density from a Hartree variational ansatz, mean-field treatment, relaxation-time/Boltzmann transport, and literature material parameters. Of these, the contact approximation and the Gaussian/static treatment of the Wigner crystal are the most consequential. One fitted parameter (δ=0.2 meV) calibrates only the Fermi-sea comparison curve.

free parameters (3)
  • v_x-e (contact exciton-electron interaction) = -0.2 eV nm²
    Long-wavelength limit of V_x-e(q) evaluated from SM Eq. S6 using experimental polarizability α=6.532 eV nm²/V² and computed ax≈1.5 nm. Used as a q-independent constant for all momenta, including umklapp. Not fitted to the diffusion prediction, but controls the band flattening.
  • δ (phonon broadening in Fermi-sea comparison) = 0.2 meV
    Chosen in SM Section VI so that the Fermi-sea diffusion curve matches the free-exciton D≈1 cm²/s at ne=10^11 cm⁻². Affects only the comparison curve, not the central Wigner-crystal result.
  • ξ (Wigner electron localization length) = from Hartree variational minimization; ξ/aW ∝ n_e^{1/8}
    Gaussian width of the Wigner electron wavefunction. Determined by minimizing the Hartree Coulomb plus kinetic energy, not fitted to the target result, but its density scaling drives the density dependence of the diffusion suppression.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Exciton-electron interaction can be approximated as a momentum-independent contact potential V_x-e(q) = v_x-e for all relevant momenta.
    SM Section I derives v_x-e in the q→0 limit but applies it to umklapp processes where q a_x is not necessarily small. This is load-bearing for the flattened bands.
  • domain assumption Wigner crystal is a static triangular lattice of Gaussian charge blobs with localization length ξ from a single-particle Hartree variational ansatz.
    SM Sections II-III. Ignores quantum fluctuations, electron dynamics, and melting; this periodic density sets the exciton potential that generates subbands.
  • domain assumption The mean-field Hamiltonian treats the Wigner crystal as unaffected by excitons; no back-action or exciton-density-induced lattice deformation.
    Eq. (1) of the main text. Valid only at low exciton densities, which is reasonable for the regime considered.
  • domain assumption Exciton transport is diffusive and described by the Wigner-function relaxation-time expression with Boltzmann occupations and phonon-limited relaxation times.
    Eq. (2) and SM Section V. The authors note quantum corrections become important at higher temperatures; the approximation is stated to hold at cryogenic temperatures.
  • domain assumption Material parameters (effective masses, dielectric constants, deformation potentials, phonon velocities) are taken from DFT/experimental literature.
    SM Table I. These are external inputs, not fitted to the central claim, but their accuracy bounds the quantitative prediction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16401 in / 13282 out tokens · 118588 ms · 2026-08-03T16:24:12.258180+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The strong Coulomb interaction in 2D materials facilitates the formation of tightly bound excitons and charge-ordered phases of matter. A prominent example is the formation of a crystalline phase from free charges due to mutual Coulomb repulsion, known as the Wigner crystal. While exciton-electron interactions have been used as a sensor for Wigner crystallization, its impact on exciton properties has been poorly understood so far. Here, we show that the weak potential induced by periodically ordered Wigner crystal electrons has a major impact on exciton propagation, albeit having only a minor influence on exciton energy. The effect is tunable with carrier density determining the Wigner crystal confinement and temperature via thermal occupation of higher subbands. Our work provides microscopic insights into the interplay between excitons and charge-ordered states identifying key signatures in exciton transport, and establishes a theoretical framework for understanding exciton propagation in the presence of strong electronic correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.13512 by Alexey Chernikov, Daniel Erkensten, Ermin Malic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of exciton transport in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Exciton band structures and group velocities along a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Density-dependent exciton diffusion coefficient in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature-dependent exciton diffusion in the pres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exciton interacting with the phonons of an electronic Wigner crystal

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    An exciton coupled to the phonons of an electronic Wigner crystal forms Bloch-band polarons whose damping is non-monotonic in electron density due to resonant interband scattering.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Perea-Causin, D

    R. Perea-Causin, D. Erkensten, J. M. Fitzgerald, J. J. P. Thompson, R. Rosati, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Exciton optics, dynamics, and transport in atomically thin semi- conductors, APL Mater. 10, 100701 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Mueller and E

    T. Mueller and E. Malic, Exciton physics and device ap- plication of two-dimensional transition metal dichalco- genide semiconductors, npj 2D Mater. App. 2, 1 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Siday, F

    T. Siday, F. Sandner, S. Brem, M. Zizlsperger, R. Perea- Causin, F. Schiegl, S. Nerreter, M. Plankl, P. Merkl, F. Mooshammer, et al. , Ultrafast nanoscopy of high- density exciton phases in wse2, Nano Letters 22, 2561 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Pop- ert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Signatures of Wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature 595, 53 (2021). 6

    2021

  6. [6]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, et al. , Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature 579, 359 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Y. Zhou, J. Sung, E. Brutschea, I. Esterlis, Y. Wang, G. Scuri, R. J. Gelly, H. Heo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, et al. , Bilayer Wigner crystals in a transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructure, Nature 595, 48 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Tang, J. Gu, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Dielectric catastrophe at the Wigner-Mott transition in a moir´ e superlattice, Nat. Commun. 13, 4271 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, C. Lee, G. H. Lee, J. Hone, T. F. Heinz, and J. Shan, Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2, Nat. Mater. 12, 207 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    J. S. Ross, S. Wu, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, A. M. Jones, G. Aivazian, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, W. Yao, et al. , Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nat. Commun. 4, 1474 (2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    Perea-Causin, S

    R. Perea-Causin, S. Brem, O. Schmidt, and E. Malic, Trion photoluminescence and trion stability in atomi- cally thin semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036903 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Courtade, M

    E. Courtade, M. Semina, M. Manca, M. Glazov, C. Robert, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. Pierre, et al. , Charged excitons in monolayer WSe2: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085302 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    Steinhoff, M

    A. Steinhoff, M. Florian, A. Singh, K. Tran, M. Ko- larczik, S. Helmrich, A. W. Achtstein, U. Woggon, N. Owschimikow, F. Jahnke, et al. , Biexciton fine struc- ture in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys. 14, 1199 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Katsch and A

    F. Katsch and A. Knorr, Optical preparation and coher- ent control of ultrafast nonlinear quantum superpositions in exciton gases: A case study for atomically thin semi- conductors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041039 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Brem and E

    S. Brem and E. Malic, Optical signatures of moir´ e trapped biexcitons, 2D Materials 11, 025030 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Brem and E

    S. Brem and E. Malic, Terahertz fingerprint of monolayer Wigner crystals, Nano Lett. 22, 1311 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    J. Sung, J. Wang, I. Esterlis, P. A. Volkov, G. Scuri, Y. Zhou, E. Brutschea, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Yang, et al. , An electronic microemulsion phase emerging from a quantum crystal-to-liquid transition, Nature Physics 21, 437 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Imaging two-dimensional generalized Wigner crystals, Nature 597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  21. [21]

    S.-D. Chen, R. Qi, H.-L. Kim, Q. Feng, R. Xia, D. Abeysinghe, J. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D.- H. Lee, and F. Wang, Terahertz electrodynamics in a zero-field wigner crystal (2025), arXiv:2509.10624 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    L. Yan, L. Ma, Y. Meng, C. Xiao, B. Chen, Q. Wu, J. Cui, Q. Cao, R. Banerjee, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Anomalously enhanced diffusivity of moir´ e excitons via manipulating the interplay with correlated electrons, arXiv:2410.11734 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Upadhyay, D

    P. Upadhyay, D. G. Su´ arez-Forero, T.-S. Huang, M. J. Mehrabad, B. Gao, S. Sarkar, D. Session, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, Y. Zhou, et al. , Giant enhancement of exciton diffusion near an electronic Mott insulator, arXiv:2409.18357 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    S. Deng, H. Park, J. Reimann, J. M. Peterson, D. D. Blach, M.-J. Sun, T. Yan, D. Sun, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Frozen non-equilibrium dynamics of exciton Mott insulators in moir´ e superlattices, Nat. Mater. , 1 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Wagner, Z

    K. Wagner, Z. A. Iakovlev, J. D. Ziegler, M. Cuccu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. M. Glazov, and A. Chernikov, Diffusion of excitons in a two-dimensional Fermi sea of free charges, Nano Lett. 23, 4708 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Shimazaki, C

    Y. Shimazaki, C. Kuhlenkamp, I. Schwartz, T. Smole´ nski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, R. Schmidt, M. Knap, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Optical signatures of periodic charge distribution in a mott-like correlated insulator state, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021027 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    K. Tran, G. Moody, F. Wu, X. Lu, J. Choi, K. Kim, A. Rai, D. A. Sanchez, J. Quan, A. Singh, et al. , Evi- dence for moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostruc- tures, Nature 567, 71 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Huang, J

    D. Huang, J. Choi, C.-K. Shih, and X. Li, Excitons in semiconductor moir´ e superlattices, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 227 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    L. Yuan, B. Zheng, J. Kunstmann, T. Brumme, A. B. Kuc, C. Ma, S. Deng, D. Blach, A. Pan, and L. Huang, Twist-angle-dependent interlayer exciton diffusion in WS2–WSe2 heterobilayers, Nat. Mater. 19, 617 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    S. Brem, C. Linder¨ alv, P. Erhart, and E. Malic, Tunable phases of moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostruc- tures, Nano Lett. 20, 8534 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    (see Supplemental Material (SM) Section I for de- tails). The Wigner electron momentum density ρe is assumed to have a Gaussian density profile in momen- tum and real space, that is, ρe(r) = 1 2πξ2 ∑ n e−|r−Rn|2/ξ2 with Rn being real-space Wigner lattice vectors and ξ de- scribing the spatial extension of the electron wave func- tion around the lattice sit...

  32. [32]

    D. K. Efimkin, E. K. Laird, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, and A. H. MacDonald, Electron-exciton interactions in the exciton-polaron problem, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075417 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Sidler, P

    M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Fermi polaron- polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconduc- tors, Nat. Phys. 13, 255 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald, Exciton-polarons in doped semiconductors in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 97, 235432 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Joy and B

    S. Joy and B. Skinner, Wigner crystallization at large fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041402 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Brem and E

    S. Brem and E. Malic, Bosonic delocalization of dipolar moir´ e excitons, Nano Lett.23, 4627 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Hess and T

    O. Hess and T. Kuhn, Maxwell-Bloch equations for spa- tially inhomogeneous semiconductor lasers. i. Theoretical formulation, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3347 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    Rosati, R

    R. Rosati, R. Perea-Caus ´ ın, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Neg- ative effective excitonic diffusion in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nanoscale 12, 356 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Perea-Causin, S

    R. Perea-Causin, S. Brem, R. Rosati, R. Jago, M. Kulig, J. D. Ziegler, J. Zipfel, A. Chernikov, and E. Malic, Ex- citon propagation and halo formation in two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett. 19, 7317 (2019). 7

    2019

  40. [40]

    Meneghini, S

    G. Meneghini, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Spatiotemporal dynamics of moir´ e excitons in van der waals heterostruc- tures, Nature Commun. 16, 8557 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Wagner, J

    K. Wagner, J. Zipfel, R. Rosati, E. Wietek, J. D. Ziegler, S. Brem, R. Perea-Caus ´ ın, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. M. Glazov, et al. , Nonclassical exciton diffusion in monolayer WSe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 076801 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Meneghini, S

    G. Meneghini, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Excitonic thermal- ization bottleneck in twisted tmd heterostructures, Nano Lett. 24, 4505 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Glazov, Quantum interference effect on exciton trans- port in monolayer semiconductors, Physical Review Let- ters 124, 166802 (2020)

    M. Glazov, Quantum interference effect on exciton trans- port in monolayer semiconductors, Physical Review Let- ters 124, 166802 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Korm´ anyos, G

    A. Korm´ anyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko, k · p the- ory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, 2D Mater. 2, 022001 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Z. Jin, X. Li, J. T. Mullen, and K. W. Kim, Intrin- sic transport properties of electrons and holes in mono- layer transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 90, 045422 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    Erkensten, S

    D. Erkensten, S. Brem, R. Perea-Causin, and E. Malic, Stability of Wigner crystals and Mott insulators in twisted moir´ e structures, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155132 (2024). Supplemental Material Impact of an electron Wigner crystal on exciton propagation Daniel Erkensten 1,2, Alexey Chernikov 3 and Ermin Malic 1,2 1Department of Physics, Philipps-Universit¨ at ...

    2024

  47. [47]

    D. K. Efimkin, E. K. Laird, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, and A. H. M acDonald, Electron-exciton interactions in the exciton- polaron problem, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075417 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Keldysh, Coulomb interaction in thin semiconductor an d semimetal films, Sov

    L. Keldysh, Coulomb interaction in thin semiconductor an d semimetal films, Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 658 (1979)

    1979

  49. [49]

    N. S. Rytova, The screened potential of a point charge in a th in film, Moscow University Physics Bulletin 3, 18 (1967)

    1967

  50. [50]

    Cavalcante, D

    L. Cavalcante, D. R. da Costa, G. Farias, D. Reichman, and A. C haves, Stark shift of excitons and trions in two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245309 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    S. Brem, C. Linder¨ alv, P. Erhart, and E. Malic, Tunable phase s of moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostructures, Nano Lett. 20, 8534 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    Huang, J

    D. Huang, J. Choi, C.-K. Shih, and X. Li, Excitons in semico nductor moir´ e superlattices, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 227 (2022). 7

    2022

  54. [54]

    Meneghini, S

    G. Meneghini, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Excitonic thermalizat ion bottleneck in twisted tmd heterostructures, Nano Lett. 24, 4505 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Meneghini, S

    G. Meneghini, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Spatiotemporal dynami cs of moir´ e excitons in van der waals heterostructures, Nature Commun. 16, 8557 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    S. Brem, J. Zipfel, M. Selig, A. Raja, L. Waldecker, J. D. Ziegl er, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Chernikov, and E. Malic, Intrinsic lifetime of higher excitonic states in tungsten dis elenide monolayers, Nanoscale 11, 12381 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    Kira and S

    M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Many-body correlations and excitoni c effects in semiconductor spectroscopy, Progress in quantum electronics 30, 155 (2006)

    2006

  58. [58]

    Korm´ anyos, G

    A. Korm´ anyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi , N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko, k · p theory for two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconducto rs, 2D Mater. 2, 022001 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Selig, G

    M. Selig, G. Bergh¨ auser, A. Raja, P. Nagler, C. Sch¨ uller, T. F. Heinz, T. Korn, A. Chernikov, E. Malic, and A. Knorr, Excitonic linewidth and coherence lifetime in monolayer trans ition metal dichalcogenides, Nature communications 7, 13279 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    Z. Jin, X. Li, J. T. Mullen, and K. W. Kim, Intrinsic transpo rt properties of electrons and holes in monolayer transition- metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 90, 045422 (2014)

    2014

  61. [61]

    Peelaers and C

    H. Peelaers and C. G. Van de Walle, Effects of strain on band s tructure and effective masses in MoS 2, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 241401 (2012)

    2012

  62. [62]

    Wagner, Z

    K. Wagner, Z. A. Iakovlev, J. D. Ziegler, M. Cuccu, T. Tanigu chi, K. Watanabe, M. M. Glazov, and A. Chernikov, Diffusion of excitons in a two-dimensional Fermi sea of free charges, Nano L ett. 23, 4708 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Zipfel, K

    J. Zipfel, K. Wagner, M. A. Semina, J. D. Ziegler, T. Taniguch i, K. Watanabe, M. M. Glazov, and A. Chernikov, Electron recoil effect in electrically tunable mo se 2 monolayers, Physic al Review B 105, 075311 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Geick, C

    R. Geick, C. H. Perry, and G. Rupprecht, Normal modes in hexag onal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. 146, 543 (1966)

    1966

  65. [65]

    Erkensten, S

    D. Erkensten, S. Brem, R. Perea-Causin, and E. Malic, Stabil ity of Wigner crystals and Mott insulators in twisted moir´ e structures, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155132 (2024)

    2024