pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.13906 · v6 · pith:2XP2EQNTnew · submitted 2025-12-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Quintessence-dominated cyclic universe with negative cosmological constant

Nasr Ahmed , Kazuharu Bamba This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 16:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords cyclic universenegative cosmological constantquintessencenon-singular cosmologymatter bouncephantom dividenull energy conditiontime-varying dark energy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A negative time-varying cosmological constant produces positive energy density throughout non-singular cyclic universe models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs two simplified cyclic models that incorporate a negative time-varying cosmological constant as a mechanism for late-time acceleration. It demonstrates that this choice yields physically acceptable evolution with positive energy density at all times, in contrast to the negative densities that arise when the constant is positive or zero. The first model produces a sign change in cosmic pressure inside a quintessence-dominated phase while preserving the null energy condition. The second model realizes a matter-bounce with a phantom-divide crossing near the bounce point, where the kinetic term and scalar potential remain positive even though their sum with the quantum potential is negative. These constructions address the need for non-singular cyclic cosmologies that can accommodate both early-universe bounces and late-time acceleration without introducing ghosts or instabilities.

Core claim

In two non-singular cyclic models that employ a negative time-varying cosmological constant, the Friedmann equations admit solutions with positive energy density throughout the cycle; the first model exhibits cosmic-pressure sign flipping in a quintessence-dominated regime with no null-energy-condition violation, while the second model shows a matter-bounce scenario in which the phantom divide is crossed near the bounce with positive kinetic term and scalar potential but negative sum of scalar and quantum potentials.

What carries the argument

Negative time-varying cosmological constant inserted into the Friedmann equations of simplified non-singular cyclic models, chosen so that the resulting energy density remains positive.

If this is right

  • Positive energy density is maintained across the entire cycle when the cosmological constant is negative and time-dependent.
  • Cosmic pressure changes sign during the quintessence-dominated phase without violating the null energy condition.
  • A matter-bounce solution exhibits a phantom-divide crossing near the bounce with positive kinetic term and scalar potential.
  • The sum of scalar and quantum potentials remains negative while the kinetic term stays positive.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same functional-form choice could be tested against supernova or BAO data that constrain the sign of the effective dark-energy equation of state at low redshift.
  • If the negative cosmological constant is later derived from a higher-dimensional or quantum-gravity construction, the models would supply a concrete link between bounce dynamics and late-time acceleration.
  • The absence of null-energy-condition violation in the first model suggests that similar sign-flipping behavior might appear in other scalar-field cosmologies once a negative varying constant is included.

Load-bearing premise

A specific functional form for the time-varying negative cosmological constant can be selected to keep energy density positive at every stage of the cycle without extra fine-tuning or instabilities.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the Friedmann equations with the chosen functional form for the negative cosmological constant produces intervals of negative energy density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.13906 by Kazuharu Bamba, Nasr Ahmed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Evolution of Λ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Evolution of Λ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate two simplified non-singular cyclic models with a negative time-varying cosmological constant to represent the non-conventional mechanism of negative cosmological constant expected to address the late-time cosmic acceleration. We show that a physically acceptable evolution with positive energy density can be realized, while negative energy density dominates in case of a positive or zero cosmological constant. In the first model, we demonstrate a sign flipping of the cosmic pressure in a quintessence-dominated universe with no violation of the null energy condition. In the second model, we propose a matter-bounce scenario with showing the crossing of the phantom divide line in the vicinity of the bounce. We find that while we get positive kinetic term and scalar potential, the sum of scalar and quantum potentials is negative.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates two simplified non-singular cyclic models that incorporate a negative time-varying cosmological constant to address late-time acceleration. It claims that a physically acceptable evolution with positive energy density throughout the cycle can be realized when the cosmological constant is negative and time-dependent, whereas negative energy density dominates for positive or zero cosmological constant. In the first model a sign flip of cosmic pressure occurs in a quintessence-dominated phase with no null-energy-condition violation; in the second model a matter-bounce scenario exhibits phantom-divide crossing near the bounce while the kinetic term and scalar potential remain positive (though their sum with quantum potentials is negative).

Significance. If the central derivations are placed on a firmer footing, the work would supply concrete examples of cyclic evolution that remain nonsingular and respect basic energy conditions while accommodating a negative varying cosmological constant. The explicit demonstration of pressure sign-flip without NEC violation and of phantom crossing with positive kinetic term are potentially useful illustrations, but the overall significance is limited by the absence of a derivation or stability analysis for the chosen functional form of Lambda(t).

major comments (2)
  1. [Model 1 construction and Friedmann equations] The functional form of the time-varying negative cosmological constant is introduced as an ansatz chosen so that the modified Friedmann equation yields rho > 0 for all t. No derivation of this ansatz from the quintessence potential V(phi), from the underlying action, or from quantum corrections is supplied; the positivity result therefore follows by construction rather than from the dynamics. Stability of the sign of rho under O(1) deformations of the time scale or amplitude of Lambda(t) is not demonstrated.
  2. [Model 2, bounce analysis] In the second model the phantom-divide crossing is reported near the bounce together with a positive kinetic term and positive scalar potential whose sum with the quantum potential is negative. The definition of the quantum potential, its relation to the scalar sector, and the explicit check that the total effective energy density remains positive are not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that the crossing is independent of the specific Lambda(t) parametrization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'quantum potentials' without a preceding definition; a short clarifying sentence or reference to the relevant equation in the main text would improve readability.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the time-dependent cosmological constant (e.g., Lambda(t) versus Lambda_eff) should be made uniform across sections and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment in detail below and indicate the revisions we plan to make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model 1 construction and Friedmann equations] The functional form of the time-varying negative cosmological constant is introduced as an ansatz chosen so that the modified Friedmann equation yields rho > 0 for all t. No derivation of this ansatz from the quintessence potential V(phi), from the underlying action, or from quantum corrections is supplied; the positivity result therefore follows by construction rather than from the dynamics. Stability of the sign of rho under O(1) deformations of the time scale or amplitude of Lambda(t) is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the functional form of Lambda(t) is introduced as an ansatz to ensure positive energy density in the cyclic evolution. This is consistent with the simplified nature of the models presented. In the revised version, we will clarify this point explicitly and provide additional motivation for the choice, drawing from the expected behavior in models addressing late-time acceleration with negative cosmological constant. We will also perform and include a stability analysis for small O(1) variations in the time scale and amplitude parameters to demonstrate the robustness of rho > 0. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Model 2, bounce analysis] In the second model the phantom-divide crossing is reported near the bounce together with a positive kinetic term and positive scalar potential whose sum with the quantum potential is negative. The definition of the quantum potential, its relation to the scalar sector, and the explicit check that the total effective energy density remains positive are not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that the crossing is independent of the specific Lambda(t) parametrization.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The quantum potential in the second model arises from the effective description in the matter-bounce scenario. In the revision, we will expand the relevant section to include a precise definition of the quantum potential, its connection to the scalar field dynamics, and an explicit verification that the total effective energy density is positive. Regarding independence from the Lambda(t) parametrization, we will add a discussion and, where feasible, additional checks to show that the phantom divide crossing near the bounce is a feature of the model setup rather than tied to one specific choice. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Derivation of the specific ansatz for Lambda(t) directly from the quintessence potential or an underlying fundamental action.
  • General proof that the phantom divide crossing is independent of any possible parametrization of Lambda(t).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Lambda(t) ansatz inserted to enforce rho>0 by construction in both models

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and model constructions]
    "We investigate two simplified non-singular cyclic models with a negative time-varying cosmological constant to represent the non-conventional mechanism of negative cosmological constant expected to address the late-time cosmic acceleration. We show that a physically acceptable evolution with positive energy density can be realized, while negative energy density dominates in case of a positive or zero cosmological constant."

    The positive energy density result is produced by inserting the chosen negative time-varying Lambda(t) into the Friedmann equations and confirming rho>0 holds; the paper does not derive the functional form from the scalar dynamics or fundamental mechanism but adopts it to achieve the stated positivity, making the 'physically acceptable evolution' a verification of the input ansatz rather than a prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Second model (matter-bounce scenario)]
    "In the second model, we propose a matter-bounce scenario with showing the crossing of the phantom divide line in the vicinity of the bounce. We find that while we get positive kinetic term and scalar potential, the sum of scalar and quantum potentials is negative."

    The phantom divide crossing and negativity of the combined potentials are reported after adopting the same negative varying Lambda(t) ansatz; positivity of the kinetic term is preserved by construction while the overall sign behavior follows from the inserted Lambda(t) term in the effective potential sum, without independent derivation from the bounce matching conditions or scalar potential.

full rationale

The paper's central claims of positive energy density throughout the cycle, sign-flipping pressure without NEC violation, and phantom divide crossing are obtained by adopting a specific negative time-varying form for Lambda(t) as an external input to the Friedmann equations, then verifying the desired positivity and sign behaviors hold after substitution. No derivation of this functional form from the quintessence scalar potential V(phi), from an underlying action, or from quantum corrections is supplied; the form is chosen precisely so that the modified constraint yields rho>0 for all t while keeping the scalar sector quintessence-like. This reduces the reported 'physically acceptable evolution' to a direct consequence of the modeling choice rather than an independent result. The contrast with positive/zero CC cases (where rho<0) further illustrates that the outcome is controlled by the sign and time-dependence of the inserted Lambda(t).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The models rest on standard FLRW cosmology plus a scalar field with an added negative time-varying CC whose functional form is chosen to produce the desired positive density; no new particles or forces are postulated, but several modeling choices function as free parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • functional form of time-varying negative cosmological constant
    Chosen to flip energy density sign relative to positive/zero cases and enable the reported pressure flip and bounce behaviors.
  • quintessence potential parameters
    Adjusted to keep kinetic term positive while allowing overall negative effective potential when quantum corrections are added.
axioms (2)
  • standard math FLRW metric and standard Friedmann equations govern the background evolution
    Invoked implicitly to derive energy density and pressure evolution from the scalar field and varying CC.
  • domain assumption Null energy condition can be preserved while pressure changes sign
    Stated as a feature of the first model without derivation shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1529 out tokens · 45641 ms · 2026-05-21T16:19:42.424733+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    3: Evolution of Λ, ρ, p, w and q as a function of the cosmic time t for MBS: (a) The positive Λ ansatz (formula (2.7)) with the new proposed one for negati ve Λ (formula (3.3))

    The deceleration and Hubble parameters are written as q(t) = − ¨aa ˙a2 = − (2n − 1)At2 + 1 2nAt2 , H (t) = 2nAt At2 + 1 (6.2) Utilizing formula (6.1) for n = 1 3 (MBS) in the suggested expression for negative Λ (formula 3.3), and in the previously obtained solution for ρ, p and w p = − − 2λΛ a2 + 3λ ˙a2 + 9a ˙a ˙λ + 3aλ¨a + 3a2¨λ 24πλa 2 , (6.3) ρ = − Λ λ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Bouncing Cosmologies,

    M. Novello and S. E. P. Bergliaffa, “Bouncing Cosmologies, ” Phys. Rept. 463 127 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    A Critical Review of Classica l Bouncing Cosmologies,

    D. Battefeld and P. Peter, “A Critical Review of Classica l Bouncing Cosmologies,” Phys. Rept. 571, 1-66 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Bouncing Cosmologies: P rogress and Problems,

    R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, “Bouncing Cosmologies: P rogress and Problems,” Found. Phys. 47, 797-850 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Bouncing Cosmology made s imple,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Bouncing Cosmology made s imple,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 135004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    No nsingular bounce cosmology from Lagrange multiplier f (R, T ) gravity,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and T. Paul,“No nsingular bounce cosmology from Lagrange multiplier f (R, T ) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 084056 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Bounce universe from string-inspired Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    K. Bamba, A. N. Makarenko, A. N. Myagky and S. D. Odintsov, “Bounce universe from string-inspired Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” JCAP 04, 001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Cosmological bouncing solu- tions in extended teleparallel gravity theories,

    A. de la Cruz-Dombriz, G.Farrugia, J. Said and D. S. Gomez ,“Cosmological bouncing solu- tions in extended teleparallel gravity theories,” Phys. Re v. D 97, 104040 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Cyclic cosmology in modified gravity,

    P. Pavlovic and M. Sossich, “Cyclic cosmology in modified gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 103519 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe,

    R. Penrose, “Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe,” Bodley Head, London (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Cyclic cosmology and holographic enta nglement entropy,

    P. H. Frampton, “Cyclic cosmology and holographic enta nglement entropy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 1844028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Cosmic evolution in a cyc lic universe,

    P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “Cosmic evolution in a cyc lic universe,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 126003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Ekpyrotic and Cyclic Cosmology,

    J. L. Lehners, “Ekpyrotic and Cyclic Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 465, 223-263 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    A new kind of cyclic univ erse,

    A. Ijjasa and P. J. Steinhardt, “A new kind of cyclic univ erse,” Phys. Lett. B 795 666-672 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem,

    S. Weinberg,“The Cosmological Constant Problem,” Rev . Mod. Phys. 61, 1-23 (1989)

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    Do cosmological observa tions allow a negative Λ ?,

    A. A. Sen, S. A. Adil and S. Sen, “Do cosmological observa tions allow a negative Λ ?,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 518 1 1098–1105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest,

    M. Abdul Karim et al. [DESI], “DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083514 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acous tic oscillations and cosmological constraints,

    M. Abdul Karim et al. [DESI], “DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acous tic oscillations and cosmological constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Balancing the vacuum energy in h eterotic M-theory,

    N. Ahmed and Ian G Moss, “Balancing the vacuum energy in h eterotic M-theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 833, 1-2 (2010). 15

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Galois groups of uplift ed de Sitter vacua,

    C. Damian and O. Loaiza-Brito, “Galois groups of uplift ed de Sitter vacua,” Ann. Phys. 467 169697 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Trans-Planckian ce nsorship of multistage inflation and dark energy,

    H. H. Li, G. Ye, Y. Cai and Y. S. Piao, “Trans-Planckian ce nsorship of multistage inflation and dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 101 6 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Toward inflation with ns = 1 in light of the Hubble tension and implications for primordial gravitational waves,

    G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, “Toward inflation with ns = 1 in light of the Hubble tension and implications for primordial gravitational waves,” Phy s. Rev. D 106 10, 103528 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Alleviating both H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy lifts the CMB-lockdown on ultralight axion,

    G. Ye, J. Zhang and Y. S. Piao, “Alleviating both H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy lifts the CMB-lockdown on ultralight axion,” Phys. Lett. B 839 137770 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Testing dark energy after pre-re combination early dark energy,

    H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, “Testing dark energy after pre-re combination early dark energy,” Phys. Lett. B 832 137244 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Can recent DESI BAO measureme nts accommodate a negative cosmological constant?

    H. Wang, Z. Peng, Y. Piao, “Can recent DESI BAO measureme nts accommodate a negative cosmological constant?” Phys. Rev. D 111, L061306 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Late-t ime phenomenology re- quired to solve the H0 tension in view of the cosmic ladders and the anisotropic and angular BAO data sets ,

    A. G /acute.ts1omez-Valent, A. Favale, M. Migliaccio and A. A. Sen,“Late-t ime phenomenology re- quired to solve the H0 tension in view of the cosmic ladders and the anisotropic and angular BAO data sets ,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 023525 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    D ark energy in light of the early JWST observations: case for a negative cosmological consta nt?,

    S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen and S. Vagnozzi, “D ark energy in light of the early JWST observations: case for a negative cosmological consta nt?,” JCAP 10, 072 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Negative cosmological constant in the dark energy sector: tests from JWST photomet ric and spectroscopic observa- tions of high-redshift galaxies,

    N. Menci, S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen and S. Vag nozzi, “Negative cosmological constant in the dark energy sector: tests from JWST photomet ric and spectroscopic observa- tions of high-redshift galaxies,” JCAP 07, 072 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using cross ing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data,

    R. Calderon et al. [DESI], “DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using cross ing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data,” JCAP 10, 048 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO me asurements,

    K. Lodha et al. [DESI], “Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO me asurements,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Inflation with a Negative Cos mological Constant,

    T. Biswas and A. Mazumdar, “Inflation with a Negative Cos mological Constant,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 023519 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    String cosmology: From the early universe to today,

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F . Quevedo and I. Zavala,“String cosmology: From the early universe to today,” Phys. Rept. 1059, 1-155 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Λ sCDM cosmology: alleviating major cosmo- logical tensions by predicting standard neutrino properti es,

    A. Yadav, S. Kumar, C. Kibris and O. Akarsu,“Λ sCDM cosmology: alleviating major cosmo- logical tensions by predicting standard neutrino properti es,” JCAP 1 042 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Scale-invariant dynami cs of galaxies, MOND, dark matter, and the dwarf spheroidals,

    A. Maeder and V. G Gueorguiev, “Scale-invariant dynami cs of galaxies, MOND, dark matter, and the dwarf spheroidals,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 492 2 2698–2708 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Scale-Covariant Theory of Gravitation and Astro- physical Applications,

    V. Canuto, S. H. Hsieh and P. J. Adams, “Scale-Covariant Theory of Gravitation and Astro- physical Applications,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 429 (1977)

    work page 1977

  36. [36]

    An alternative to the ΛCDM model: the case of scale invariance,

    A. Maeder, “An alternative to the ΛCDM model: the case of scale invariance,” The Astrophys. J. 834 194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Modified Friedman n equations via conformal Bohm – de Broglie gravity,

    G. Gregori, B. Reville and B. Larder, “Modified Friedman n equations via conformal Bohm – de Broglie gravity,” Astrophys. J. 886 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) * Observa- tions: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,

    D. N. Spergel et al. ,“First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) * Observa- tions: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,” Astrop hys. J. Supp. 148 175 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Evolution of the S cale Factor with a Variable Cos- mological Term,

    J. M. Overduin and F. I. Cooperstock, “Evolution of the S cale Factor with a Variable Cos- mological Term,” Phys. Rev. D 58, 043506 (1998)

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Hubble expansio n and structure formation in time varying vacuum models,

    S. Basilakos, M. Plionis, and J. Sola, “Hubble expansio n and structure formation in time varying vacuum models,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 083511 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    On the cosmolog ical consequences of a time dependent lambda term,

    J. C. Carvalho, J. A. S. Lima and I. Waga, “On the cosmolog ical consequences of a time dependent lambda term,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 2404 (1992). 16

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    Supernova constraints on decaying vacuum cosmology,

    S. Carneiro, C. Pigozzo, H. A. Borges and J. S. Alcaniz, “ Supernova constraints on decaying vacuum cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 023532 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    Observational constraints on late- time Lambda(t) cosmology,

    S. Carneiro, M. A. Dantas, C. Pigozzo and J. S. Alcaniz, “ Observational constraints on late- time Lambda(t) cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 083504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [46]

    Expansion Hist ory with Decaying Vacuum: A Complete Cosmological Scenario,

    J. A. S. Lima, S. Basilakos and J. Sol‘a, “Expansion Hist ory with Decaying Vacuum: A Complete Cosmological Scenario,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. So c. 431 923 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [47]

    Dynamical vacuum e nergy in the expanding Universe confronted with observations: a dedicated study,

    A. G /acute.ts1omez-Valent, J. Sol‘a and S. Basilakos, “Dynamical vacuum e nergy in the expanding Universe confronted with observations: a dedicated study, ” JCAP 1501 004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [48]

    Vacuum models with a linear and a q uadratic term in H: structure formation and number counts analysis,

    A. G /acute.ts1omez-Valent and J. Sol‘a, “Vacuum models with a linear and a q uadratic term in H: structure formation and number counts analysis,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 448 2810 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [49]

    Model Independe nt Tests of Cosmic Growth vs Expansion,

    A. Shafieloo, A. G. Kim and E. V. Linder, “Model Independe nt Tests of Cosmic Growth vs Expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 87, 023520 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [50]

    Gaussian Proces s Cosmography,

    A. Shafieloo, A. G. Kim and E. V. Linder,“Gaussian Proces s Cosmography,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 123530 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [51]

    Oscillating Quintom Model with Ti me Periodic Varying Deceleration Parameter,

    S. Ming and Z. Liang, “Oscillating Quintom Model with Ti me Periodic Varying Deceleration Parameter,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 1, 010401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [52]

    Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe,

    J. de Haro, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and S. Pan,“Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe,” Phys. Rept. 1034, 1-114 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [54]

    A Cyclic Model of the Univ erse,

    P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “A Cyclic Model of the Univ erse,” Science 296 5572 (2002)

    work page 2002

  52. [55]

    Ups and downs of cyclic univ erses,

    T. Clifton and J. D. Barrow, “Ups and downs of cyclic univ erses,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 043515 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [56]

    Rapidly Desce nding Dark Energy and the End of Cosmic Expansion,

    C. Andrei, A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Rapidly Desce nding Dark Energy and the End of Cosmic Expansion,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 e2200539119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [57]

    Transit ion redshift in f (T ) cosmology and observational constraints,

    S. Capozziello, O. Luongo and E. N. Saridakis, “Transit ion redshift in f (T ) cosmology and observational constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 124037 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [58]

    Hubble parameter measurement constraints on the redshift of the deceleration-acceleration transiti on, dynamical dark energy, and space curvature,

    O. Farooq, F. Madiyar, S. Crandall and B. Ratra, “Hubble parameter measurement constraints on the redshift of the deceleration-acceleration transiti on, dynamical dark energy, and space curvature,” Astrophys. J. 835 26 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [59]

    Bouncing Uni verse with Quintom Matter,

    Y. Caia, T. Qiu, Y. Piao, M. Li and X. Zhang, “Bouncing Uni verse with Quintom Matter,” JHEP 071 (2007)

    work page 2007

  57. [60]

    Post reionization HI 21 cm signal: a probe of negative cosmological constant,

    C. Dash, T. G. Sarkar and A. Sen, “Post reionization HI 21 cm signal: a probe of negative cosmological constant,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 527 4 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [61]

    Halting et ernal acceleration with an effective negative cosmological constant,

    F. C. Vincenzo, P. C. Rolando and Y. L. Nodal, “Halting et ernal acceleration with an effective negative cosmological constant,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25 135010 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [62]

    Model of the universe including dark energy accounted for by both a quintessence field and a (n egative) cosmological constant,

    R. Cardenas, T. Gonzalez, Y. Leiva, O. Martin and I. Quir os, “Model of the universe including dark energy accounted for by both a quintessence field and a (n egative) cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 083501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [63]

    LXCDM: A Cosmon mod el solution to the cosmological 17 coincidence problem?,

    J. Grande, J. Sola and H. Stefancic, “LXCDM: A Cosmon mod el solution to the cosmological 17 coincidence problem?,” JCAP 0608 011 (2006)

    work page 2006

  61. [64]

    Friedmann Equations and Thermodyn amics of Apparent Horizons,

    Y. Gong and A. Wang, “Friedmann Equations and Thermodyn amics of Apparent Horizons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 211301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  62. [65]

    Negative Energy C osmology and the Cosmological Constant,

    P. Landry, M. Abdelqader and K. Lake, “Negative Energy C osmology and the Cosmological Constant,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 084002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [66]

    Cosmic acceleration with a nega tive cosmological constant in higher dimensions,

    K. Maeda and N. J. Ohta, “Cosmic acceleration with a nega tive cosmological constant in higher dimensions,” JHEP 95 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [67]

    Scalar field c ollapse with negative cosmological constant,

    R. Baier, H. Nishimura and S. A. Stricker, “Scalar field c ollapse with negative cosmological constant,” Class. Quan. Grav. 32 13 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [68]

    Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity,

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. O z, “Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity,” Phys. Rept. 323 183 (2000)

    work page 2000

  66. [69]

    Black hole chemistr y: thermodynamics with Lambda,

    D. Kubiznak, B. Robert and M. Mann, “Black hole chemistr y: thermodynamics with Lambda,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 063001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [70]

    Note on dark energy and cosmic tra nsit in a scale-invariance cosmology,

    N. Ahmed and T. Kamel , “Note on dark energy and cosmic tra nsit in a scale-invariance cosmology,” Int. J Geom. Meth. Mod .Phys 18 05, 2150070 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [71]

    Loop quantum gravity effects might res trict a cyclic evolution,

    B. Li and P. Singh, “Loop quantum gravity effects might res trict a cyclic evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 046013 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [72]

    AdS cycles in eternally inflating bac kground,

    Z. Liu and Y. Piao, “AdS cycles in eternally inflating bac kground,” Class. Quantum Grav. 31 175004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [73]

    Cosmic evolution in a cyc lic universe,

    P.J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “Cosmic evolution in a cyc lic universe,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 126003 (2002)

    work page 2002

  71. [74]

    Ek pyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “Ek pyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 123522 (2001)

    work page 2001

  72. [75]

    On likely values of the cosm ological constant,

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, “On likely values of the cosm ological constant,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 083502 (2000)

    work page 2000

  73. [76]

    Cosmology With Negative Potentials,

    G. Felder, A. Frolov, L. Kofman and A. Linde, “Cosmology With Negative Potentials,” Phys. Rev .D 66, 023507 (2002)

    work page 2002

  74. [77]

    An exposition on Fr iedmann cosmology with negative energy densities,

    J. Nemiroff, R. Joshi, and B. R. Patla, “An exposition on Fr iedmann cosmology with negative energy densities,” JCAP 06 006 (2015)

    work page 2015

  75. [78]

    Nonsingular bouncin g cosmology: Consistency of the effective description,

    M. Koehn, J. Lehners and B. Ovrut, “Nonsingular bouncin g cosmology: Consistency of the effective description,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 103501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [79]

    Unitary null energy conditi on violation in P(X) cosmologies,

    C. de Rham and S. Melville, “Unitary null energy conditi on violation in P(X) cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 123523 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [80]

    A classical non-singular bouncing universe,

    O. Gungor and G. D. Starkman, “A classical non-singular bouncing universe,” JCAP 04 003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [81]

    Non-singular bo uncing cosmology with positive spatial curvature and flat scalar potential,

    H. Matsui, F. Takahashi and T. Terada, “Non-singular bo uncing cosmology with positive spatial curvature and flat scalar potential,” Phys. Lett. B 795 10 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [82]

    The large scale structu re of spacetime (Cambridge Uni- versity Press),

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, “The large scale structu re of spacetime (Cambridge Uni- versity Press),” England (1973)

    work page 1973

  80. [83]

    General Relativity (University of Chicago Press),

    R. M. Wald, “General Relativity (University of Chicago Press),” Chicago (1984)

    work page 1984

Showing first 80 references.