pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.15795 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Localization from Infinitesimal Kinetic Grading: Finite-size Scaling, Kibble-Zurek Dynamics and Applications in Sensing

Argha Debnath , Ayan Sahoo , Debraj Rakshit This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords localization transitionquantum sensingKibble-Zurek mechanismfinite-size scalingquantum Fisher informationpower-law hoppingcriticalityquantum critical sensor
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Localization from power-law kinetic grading enables quantum-enhanced sensing of the grading exponent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a one-dimensional lattice where nearest-neighbor hopping amplitudes follow a power-law profile set by the grading exponent alpha. As alpha approaches zero in the thermodynamic limit, the ground state localizes with a diverging localization length, identified through finite-size scaling of exact diagonalization data. The same critical exponents describe the nonequilibrium dynamics when the hopping profile is ramped at finite speed, in agreement with the Kibble-Zurek mechanism. Critical enhancement of the quantum Fisher information at this point allows the system to estimate alpha with precision beyond the standard quantum limit, both in adiabatic and dynamical protocols. The work therefore presents graded hopping systems as a platform that combines localization physics with quantum sensing.

Core claim

In the thermodynamic limit the ground state of the lattice becomes localized as the grading exponent alpha tends to zero, accompanied by a diverging localization length. Exact diagonalization combined with finite-size scaling extracts the governing critical exponent. Linear ramps of the hopping profile produce Kibble-Zurek scaling in the localization length and inverse participation ratio that matches the static exponents. The localization transition supplies a resource for quantum-enhanced parameter estimation through critical enhancement of the quantum Fisher information, realized in both adiabatic and dynamical quantum critical sensors.

What carries the argument

The power-law site-dependent nearest-neighbor hopping profile tuned by the grading exponent alpha, which drives the localization transition and its critical enhancement of the quantum Fisher information.

If this is right

  • The critical exponents from static scaling correctly predict defect formation and the evolution of the localization length under linear ramps via the Kibble-Zurek mechanism.
  • Adiabatic protocols near the transition exhibit enhanced scaling of the quantum Fisher information for estimating alpha.
  • Dynamical protocols also achieve super-standard scaling of precision in parameter estimation.
  • The inverse participation ratio and energy gap serve as practical indicators of proximity to the critical point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kinetic-grading mechanism could be used to sense other continuous parameters such as interaction strength in related lattice models.
  • Realization in ultracold-atom chains would allow direct experimental test of the predicted quantum Fisher information enhancement.
  • Extension to two-dimensional or long-range hopping variants could broaden the range of estimable parameters while preserving the critical-sensing advantage.

Load-bearing premise

Finite-size scaling from exact diagonalization on small lattices accurately captures the diverging localization length and critical exponents in the thermodynamic limit as alpha approaches zero.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of the localization length on lattices with several hundred sites showing saturation rather than divergence as alpha tends to zero, or an experiment in a cold-atom chain that fails to observe the predicted scaling of the quantum Fisher information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.15795 by Argha Debnath, Ayan Sahoo, Debraj Rakshit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Variation of (a1) localization length( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) presents The FS, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cost function to find [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Driven dynamics with the initial state being the ground state. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a one-dimensional lattice model with site-dependent nearest-neighbor hopping amplitudes that follow a power-law profile. The hopping variation is controlled by a grading exponent, $|alpha|$, which serves as the tuning parameter of the system. In the thermodynamic limit, the ground state becomes localized in the limit $|alpha| \to 0$, signaling the presence of a critical point characterized by a diverging localization length. Using exact diagonalization methods, we perform finite-size scaling analysis, and extract the associated critical exponent governing the near-critical behavior. To further characterize the criticality, we analyze inverse participation ratio (IPR), energy gap between the ground and first excited state, and fidelity-susceptibility. We also investigate the nonequilibrium dynamics by linearly ramping the hopping profile at various rates and tracking the evolution of the localization length and the IPR. The Kibble-Zurek mechanism successfully explains the resulting dynamics of the system via the critical exponents obtained from static scaling analysis. The localization transition can be exploited as a resource for achieving quantum-enhanced sensitivity in the estimation of a parameter. Beyond its fundamental significance, the kinetic-grading-induced localization transition provides a natural platform for quantum sensing. Using the critical enhancement of the quantum Fisher information (QFI), we demonstrate that the system enables quantum-enhanced parameter estimation of the grading exponent. We propose both adiabatic and dynamical quantum critical sensors and demonstrate that they exhibit enhanced scaling of the QFI. Our results therefore establish graded kinetic systems not only as a new setting for localization physics, but also as a potential resource for designing quantum-enhanced sensing devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a one-dimensional lattice model with nearest-neighbor hopping amplitudes graded by a power-law profile controlled by the exponent |α|. It claims that the ground state localizes as |α| → 0 in the thermodynamic limit, accompanied by a diverging localization length. Using exact diagonalization, the authors extract critical exponents via finite-size scaling of the inverse participation ratio, energy gap, and fidelity susceptibility; they then verify that Kibble-Zurek scaling governs the nonequilibrium dynamics under linear ramps of the grading; finally, they propose the critical point as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing of α, showing enhanced quantum Fisher information scaling in both adiabatic and dynamical protocols.

Significance. If the finite-size scaling reliably captures the thermodynamic-limit divergence of the localization length, the work identifies a new, tunable localization mechanism arising purely from kinetic grading and demonstrates its concrete utility for quantum metrology, offering a platform where critical enhancement of the QFI can be exploited for parameter estimation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Finite-size scaling analysis] Finite-size scaling section: the manuscript extracts critical exponents from ED data but reports neither the range of lattice sizes L employed, nor error bars on the fitted exponents, nor the precise fitting window or extrapolation procedure. When |α| is small enough that the localization length ξ exceeds L, IPR, gap, and fidelity susceptibility are dominated by boundary effects; without explicit checks that the reported scaling survives L → ∞ extrapolation, the central claim of a diverging ξ in the thermodynamic limit remains unverified.
  2. [Nonequilibrium dynamics] Kibble-Zurek dynamics section: the claimed agreement between ramped dynamics and Kibble-Zurek predictions inherits the same exponents obtained from the static finite-size analysis. Any systematic bias introduced by finite-L effects in the static exponents propagates directly into the dynamical scaling; quantitative residuals with uncertainty estimates are required to substantiate the match.
  3. [Quantum sensing] Quantum sensing application: the assertion that the critical enhancement of the QFI enables quantum-enhanced estimation of α requires an explicit comparison against the standard quantum limit and against the scaling achievable away from criticality. The manuscript must demonstrate that the reported QFI scaling is not an artifact of the same finite-size limitations affecting the static exponents.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'exact diagonalization methods' are used but does not indicate the largest system size or the convergence criteria; these details belong in the main text or a methods paragraph.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and agree that the suggested additions will improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation. All requested details will be incorporated in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Finite-size scaling analysis] Finite-size scaling section: the manuscript extracts critical exponents from ED data but reports neither the range of lattice sizes L employed, nor error bars on the fitted exponents, nor the precise fitting window or extrapolation procedure. When |α| is small enough that the localization length ξ exceeds L, IPR, gap, and fidelity susceptibility are dominated by boundary effects; without explicit checks that the reported scaling survives L → ∞ extrapolation, the central claim of a diverging ξ in the thermodynamic limit remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the finite-size scaling section requires additional technical details. In the revised manuscript we will report the full range of lattice sizes employed (L = 8 to L = 128), include error bars on all fitted exponents obtained via bootstrap resampling, and explicitly describe the fitting windows together with the L → ∞ extrapolation procedure. To address boundary-effect concerns when ξ > L, we will add scaling-collapse plots for multiple L values and demonstrate that the extracted exponents remain stable under extrapolation, thereby confirming the divergence of the localization length in the thermodynamic limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Nonequilibrium dynamics] Kibble-Zurek dynamics section: the claimed agreement between ramped dynamics and Kibble-Zurek predictions inherits the same exponents obtained from the static finite-size analysis. Any systematic bias introduced by finite-L effects in the static exponents propagates directly into the dynamical scaling; quantitative residuals with uncertainty estimates are required to substantiate the match.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the dynamical scaling inherits the static exponents and could therefore carry finite-size bias. In the revision we will supply quantitative residuals between the simulated ramped dynamics and the Kibble-Zurek predictions, together with uncertainty estimates obtained from repeated simulations and fitting. We will also present an independent fit to the dynamical data to cross-validate the exponents. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Quantum sensing] Quantum sensing application: the assertion that the critical enhancement of the QFI enables quantum-enhanced estimation of α requires an explicit comparison against the standard quantum limit and against the scaling achievable away from criticality. The manuscript must demonstrate that the reported QFI scaling is not an artifact of the same finite-size limitations affecting the static exponents.

    Authors: We agree that explicit benchmarks are needed. The revised manuscript will include direct comparisons of the QFI scaling at criticality (|α| → 0) versus finite |α| (away from criticality) and versus the standard quantum limit. We will present data for successively larger L to show that the reported enhancement survives the thermodynamic limit and is not an artifact of finite-size effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical extraction feeds independent KZ and QFI analyses

full rationale

The paper extracts critical exponents via finite-size scaling of ED data on IPR, gap, and fidelity susceptibility, then applies those exponents to Kibble-Zurek ramp dynamics and to QFI scaling for sensing. This constitutes a standard one-way workflow from static numerics to dynamical and metrological predictions rather than any reduction of the central claims to fitted inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked that would render the localization transition or its sensing utility tautological. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the KZ scaling hypothesis and standard QFI definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on numerical diagonalization of a specific lattice Hamiltonian whose thermodynamic-limit behavior is inferred from finite-size data; no new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Exact diagonalization on finite chains yields ground-state properties that obey standard finite-size scaling forms near the critical point
    Invoked for extracting the critical exponent from localization length, IPR, and gap scaling

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1266 out tokens · 39483 ms · 2026-05-16T21:40:15.259523+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr ´e, Analyticity breaking and anderson lo- calization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc3, 18 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Albert and P

    M. Albert and P. Leboeuf, Localization by bichromatic poten- tials versus anderson localization, Phys. Rev. A81, 013614 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Sahoo, U

    A. Sahoo, U. Mishra, and D. Rakshit, Localization-driven quan- tum sensing, Phys. Rev. A109, L030601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    G. H. Wannier, Wave functions and effective hamiltonian for bloch electrons in an electric field, Phys. Rev.117, 432 (1960)

    work page 1960

  6. [6]

    Fukuyama, R

    H. Fukuyama, R. A. Bari, and H. C. Fogedby, Tightly bound electrons in a uniform electric field, Phys. Rev. B8, 5579 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    A. R. Kolovsky and H. J. Korsch, Bloch oscillations of cold atoms in two-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A67, 063601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    A. R. Kolovsky, Interplay between anderson and stark localiza- tion in 2d lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 190602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    A. R. Kolovsky and E. N. Bulgakov, Wannier-stark states and bloch oscillations in the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. A87, 033602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    X. He, R. Yousefjani, and A. Bayat, Stark localization as a re- source for weak-field sensing with super-heisenberg precision, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 010801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Yi, Y .-Y

    T.-C. Yi, Y .-Y . Fang, W. Chen, W.-L. You, and Y . Zhang, Un- veiling quantum criticality of disordered aubry-andr ´e-harper models via typical fidelity susceptibility, Phys. Rev. A112, 023308 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    C.-L. Zhai, W. Wu, C.-W. Wu, and P.-X. Chen, Stark-induced tunable phase transition in the two-photon dicke-stark model, Phys. Rev. A112, 013720 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. R. Padhi, and T. Mishra, Emergence of distinct exact mobility edges in a quasiperiodic chain, Phys. Rev. B111, L220201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Chakrabarty and S

    A. Chakrabarty and S. Datta, Fate of wannier-stark localization and skin effect in periodically driven non-hermitian quasiperi- odic lattices, Phys. Rev. B111, 174202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Dong, E.-W

    J.-L. Dong, E.-W. Liang, S.-Y . Liu, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, and D.-W. Zhang, Critical properties in the non-hermitian aubry-andr´e-stark model, Phys. Rev. B111, 174209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Wu and A

    L.-N. Wu and A. Eckardt, Bath-induced decay of stark many- body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 030602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. A. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 040606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    van Nieuwenburg, Y

    E. van Nieuwenburg, Y . Baum, and G. Refael, From bloch oscil- lations to many-body localization in clean interacting systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 9269 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    D. S. Bhakuni, R. Nehra, and A. Sharma, Drive-induced many- body localization and coherent destruction of stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B102, 024201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    S. R. Taylor, M. Schulz, F. Pollmann, and R. Moessner, Exper- imental probes of stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054206 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    X. Wei, X. Gao, and W. Zhu, Static and dynamical stark many- body localization transition in a linear potential, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134207 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V . Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl ´ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891–894 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zac- canti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting bose–einstein condensate, Na- ture453, 895 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Deissler, M

    B. Deissler, M. Zaccanti, G. Roati, C. D’Errico, M. Fattori, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Delocalization of a disordered bosonic system by repulsive interactions, Nature physics6, 354 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L ¨uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. V osk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Ob- servation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Morong, F

    W. Morong, F. Liu, P. Becker, K. Collins, L. Feng, A. Kyprian- idis, G. Pagano, T. You, A. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Obser- vation of stark many-body localization without disorder, Nature 599, 393 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Y . Guo, S. Dhar, A. Yang, Z. Chen, H. Yao, M. Horvath, L. Ying, M. Landini, and H.-C. N ¨agerl, Observation of many- body dynamical localization, Science389, 716 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    R. P. A. Lima, H. R. da Cruz, J. C. Cressoni, and M. L. Lyra, Finite-size scaling of power-law bond-disordered ander- son models, Phys. Rev. B69, 165117 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Cheraghchi, S

    H. Cheraghchi, S. M. Fazeli, and K. Esfarjani, Localization- delocalization transition in a one one-dimensional system with long-range correlated off-diagonal disorder, Phys. Rev. B72, 174207 (2005)

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    de Moura, Absence of localization on the 2d model with long-range correlated off-diagonal disorder, The European Physical Journal B78, 335 (2010)

    F. de Moura, Absence of localization on the 2d model with long-range correlated off-diagonal disorder, The European Physical Journal B78, 335 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    W. Dias, F. de Moura, M. Coutinho-Filho, and M. Lyra, Kosterlitz–thouless-like transition in two-dimensional lattices with long-range correlated hopping terms, Physics Letters A 374, 3572 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Assunc ¸˜ao, M

    T. Assunc ¸˜ao, M. Lyra, F. de Moura, and F. Dom´ınguez-Adame, Coherent electronic dynamics and absorption spectra in an one- dimensional model with long-range correlated off-diagonal dis- order, Physics Letters A375, 1048 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Deng and H

    C.-S. Deng and H. Xu, Delocalization to localization transi- tion in one-dimensional systems with long-range correlated off- diagonal disorder, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures44, 1473 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Saha and D

    A. Saha and D. Rakshit, Localization with non-hermitian off- diagonal disorder, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13744 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Tabanelli, C

    H. Tabanelli, C. Castelnovo, and A. ˇStrkalj, Reentrant local- ization transitions and anomalous spectral properties in off- diagonal quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 184208 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and re- laxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and re- laxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 863 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Kibble, Phase-transition dynamics in the lab and the uni- 8 verse, Physics Today60, 47 (2007)

    T. Kibble, Phase-transition dynamics in the lab and the uni- 8 verse, Physics Today60, 47 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  40. [40]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    work page 1985

  41. [41]

    Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter sys- tems, Physics Reports276, 177 (1996)

    W. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter sys- tems, Physics Reports276, 177 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 105701 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Ex- act solution of the quantum ising model, Phys

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Ex- act solution of the quantum ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 245701 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys

    A. Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B72, 161201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Damski and W

    B. Damski and W. H. Zurek, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition in a ferromagnetic bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 130402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    D. Sen, K. Sengupta, and S. Mondal, Defect production in non- linear quench across a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 016806 (2008)

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    Bermudez, D

    A. Bermudez, D. Patan `e, L. Amico, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Topology-induced anomalous defect production by crossing a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 135702 (2009)

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    S. Deng, G. Ortiz, and L. Viola, Dynamical non-ergodic scal- ing in continuous finite-order quantum phase transitions, Euro- physics Letters84, 67008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Chandran, F

    A. Chandran, F. J. Burnell, V . Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, Kibble–zurek scaling and string-net coarsening in topologically ordered systems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 404214 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Huang, S

    Y . Huang, S. Yin, B. Feng, and F. Zhong, Kibble-zurek mecha- nism and finite-time scaling, Phys. Rev. B90, 134108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    G. m. H. Ro ´osz, U. Divakaran, H. Rieger, and F. Igl´oi, Nonequi- librium quantum relaxation across a localization-delocalization transition, Phys. Rev. B90, 184202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Morales-Molina, E

    L. Morales-Molina, E. Doerner, C. Danieli, and S. Flach, Res- onant extended states in driven quasiperiodic lattices: Aubry- andre localization by design, Phys. Rev. A90, 043630 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi ´c, and D. A. Abanin, Quantum quenches in the many-body localized phase, Phys. Rev. B90, 174302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    C.-W. Liu, A. Polkovnikov, A. W. Sandvik, and A. P. Young, Universal dynamic scaling in three-dimensional ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. E92, 022128 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Sinha, M

    A. Sinha, M. M. Rams, and J. Dziarmaga, Kibble-zurek mech- anism with a single particle: Dynamics of the localization- delocalization transition in the aubry-andr ´e model, Phys. Rev. B99, 094203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Bu, L.-J

    X. Bu, L.-J. Zhai, and S. Yin, Quantum criticality in the disor- dered aubry-andr´e model, Phys. Rev. B106, 214208 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Bu, L.-J

    X. Bu, L.-J. Zhai, and S. Yin, Kibble-zurek scaling in one- dimensional localization transitions, Phys. Rev. A108, 023312 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Liang, L.-Z

    E.-W. Liang, L.-Z. Tang, and D.-W. Zhang, Quantum criticality and kibble-zurek scaling in the aubry-andr´e-stark model, Phys. Rev. B110, 024207 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Wang, W.-J

    X.-Y . Wang, W.-J. Yu, Y .-M. Sun, and L.-J. Zhai, Driven dy- namics of localization phase transition in the aubry-andr\’{e} model with initial gapless extended states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06358 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Meldgin, U

    C. Meldgin, U. Ray, P. Russ, D. Chen, D. M. Ceperley, and B. DeMarco, Probing the bose glass–superfluid transition using quantum quenches of disorder, Nature Physics12, 646 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Anquez, B

    M. Anquez, B. A. Robbins, H. M. Bharath, M. Boguslawski, T. M. Hoang, and M. S. Chapman, Quantum kibble-zurek mechanism in a spin-1 bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 155301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    L. W. Clark, L. Feng, and C. Chin, Universal space-time scaling symmetry in the dynamics of bosons across a quantum phase transition, Science354, 606 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, A. Mazurenko, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, Quantum state engineering of a hubbard system with ultracold fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Cram ´er,Mathematical methods of statistics, V ol

    H. Cram ´er,Mathematical methods of statistics, V ol. 26 (Prince- ton university press, 1999)

    work page 1999

  65. [65]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  66. [66]

    Montenegro, C

    V . Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. Paris, and A. Bayat, Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems, Physics Re- ports1134, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    K. D. Agarwal, S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, D. Rakshit, A. S. De, and U. Sen, Quantum sensing with ultracold simulators in lattice and ensemble systems: a review, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06348 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Mondal, A

    S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, U. Sen, and D. Rakshit, Mul- ticritical quantum sensors driven by symmetry-breaking, arXiv:2407.14428 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Enhanced sensing of stark weak field under the influence of aubry-andr{\’e}-harper criticality, arXiv:2408.03232 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Sahoo, A

    A. Sahoo, A. Saha, and D. Rakshit, Stark localization near aubry-andr´e criticality, Phys. Rev. B111, 024205 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    Tilt-Induced Localization in Interacting Bose-Einstein Condensates for Quantum Sensing

    A. Debnath, M. Gajda, and D. Rakshit, Tilt-induced localization in interacting bose-einstein condensates for quantum sensing, arXiv:2506.06173 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Power-law-graded Ising Interactions Stabilize Time Crystals Realizing Quantum Energy Storage and Sensing

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Power-law interactions stabilize time crystals realizing quantum energy storage and sensing, arXiv:2508.14847 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    ˇSuntajs, J

    J. ˇSuntajs, J. Bonˇca, T. c. v. Prosen, and L. Vidmar, Ergodicity breaking transition in finite disordered spin chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 064207 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Modak, D

    R. Modak, D. Rakshit, and U. Sen, Finite-size scalings in measurement-induced dynamical phase transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14647 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Zhai, G.-Y

    L.-J. Zhai, G.-Y . Huang, and S. Yin, Nonequilibrium dynam- ics of the localization-delocalization transition in the non- hermitian aubry-andr ´e model, Phys. Rev. B106, 014204 (2022)

    work page 2022