pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.06173 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Tilt-Induced Localization in Interacting Bose-Einstein Condensates for Quantum Sensing

Argha Debnath , Mariusz Gajda , Debraj Rakshit This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 11:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords Bose-Einstein condensatestilted optical latticeslocalization transitionquantum criticalityquantum sensingGross-Pitaevskii equationfidelity susceptibility
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Interacting Bose-Einstein condensates in tilted optical lattices can probe quantum criticality using their single-mode wavefunction for quantum sensing applications.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies localization transitions in interacting BECs trapped in tilted optical lattices by solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for shallow lattices and the Bose-Hubbard model for deep lattices. It finds that the root-mean-square width and fidelity susceptibility scale in a way that marks a localization-delocalization transition driven by the tilt, and this scaling persists even with interactions in the mean-field approach. If true, this means the condensate wavefunction itself can act as a probe for quantum critical behavior and support quantum-enhanced metrology for detecting small gradients with high precision.

Core claim

Despite the single-mode nature of the condensate wavefunction, the authors demonstrate that it can effectively probe quantum criticality through scaling properties of the root-mean-square width and fidelity susceptibility as functions of the tilt. They propose interacting BECs in tilted lattices as a platform for quantum critical sensing where the wavefunction serves as both a sensitive probe of localization and a resource for quantum-enhanced metrology, opening new avenues for precision gradient sensing based on localization phenomena in bosonic systems.

What carries the argument

The tilt-induced localization-delocalization transition analyzed through the scaling of the root-mean-square width and fidelity susceptibility in the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the interacting condensate wavefunction.

If this is right

  • The single-mode condensate wavefunction serves as an effective probe of quantum criticality.
  • Interacting BECs in tilted lattices provide a platform for quantum critical sensing.
  • The approach enables precision gradient sensing based on localization in bosonic systems.
  • Scaling properties characterize criticality even in the presence of interactions within the GPE description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could simplify sensing experiments by relying on mean-field descriptions rather than full quantum many-body simulations.
  • Similar tilt effects might be explored in other ultracold atom systems for different types of criticality.
  • Practical implementations could integrate this with existing BEC technologies for portable quantum sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling properties of localization indicators like root-mean-square width and fidelity susceptibility in the Gross-Pitaevskii description accurately reflect quantum criticality even when interactions are present.

What would settle it

If experiments on interacting BECs in tilted lattices show that the root-mean-square width fails to scale according to the predicted critical behavior near the localization transition, the claim that the single-mode wavefunction probes quantum criticality would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06173 by Argha Debnath, Debraj Rakshit, Mariusz Gajda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Variation of density with three different relative Stark field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Density profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate localization transitions in interacting Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) confined in tilted optical lattices, focusing on both the continuum limit accessed via shallow lattice depths and the tight-binding limit realized in the deep lattice regime. Utilizing the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) and the many-body Bose-Hubbard model, we analyze the scaling behavior of localization indicators, such as the root mean square width and fidelity susceptibility, as a function of the applied tilt. Our results reveal clear signatures of a localization-delocalization transition driven by the linear potential, with scaling properties that characterize criticality even in the presence of interactions within the GPE description. Despite the single-mode nature of the condensate wavefunction, we demonstrate that it can effectively probe quantum criticality. Building on this, we propose the use of interacting BECs in tilted lattices as a platform for quantum critical sensing, where the condensate wavefunction serves both as a sensitive probe of localization and a practical resource for quantum-enhanced metrology. This approach opens new avenues for precision gradient sensing based on localization phenomena in bosonic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines localization-delocalization transitions in interacting Bose-Einstein condensates in tilted optical lattices. It employs the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) for the continuum/shallow-lattice regime and the Bose-Hubbard model for the deep-lattice tight-binding regime. Scaling of the root-mean-square width and fidelity susceptibility versus tilt strength is analyzed, with the claim that these exhibit signatures of criticality even within the interacting GPE description. The single-mode condensate wavefunction is argued to probe quantum criticality, leading to a proposal for quantum critical sensing and quantum-enhanced metrology using interacting BECs.

Significance. If the GPE scaling results are shown to faithfully capture the critical behavior of the underlying many-body quantum transition (rather than mean-field artifacts), the work would provide a concrete, experimentally relevant platform for localization-based quantum sensing. The dual use of GPE and Bose-Hubbard treatments is a positive feature, as is the focus on a single-mode resource for metrology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final two paragraphs): The central claim that 'scaling properties ... characterize criticality even in the presence of interactions within the GPE description' and that the single-mode wavefunction thereby probes quantum criticality is load-bearing. The GPE is a classical-field mean-field approximation that omits quantum fluctuations and number-phase uncertainty; the manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted exponents or susceptibility divergence match those of the Bose-Hubbard model or the expected universality class, rather than merely reproducing a mean-field crossover.
  2. [Results (GPE)] Results section on GPE scaling: The identification of the localization-delocalization transition via RMS width and fidelity susceptibility requires explicit finite-size scaling analysis or data-collapse procedures to establish true criticality. Without these, or without quantitative comparison to Bose-Hubbard critical tilt values and exponents, it remains unclear whether the reported signatures survive beyond-mean-field corrections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'clear signatures' should be accompanied by a brief statement of the quantitative criterion (e.g., power-law exponent range or susceptibility peak height) used to identify the transition.
  2. [Methods/Notation] Notation: Define the precise definition of fidelity susceptibility (e.g., with respect to which parameter) at first use, and clarify whether the tilt is the sole control parameter or if interaction strength is also varied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and have revised the manuscript to include additional comparisons and scaling analyses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final two paragraphs): The central claim that 'scaling properties ... characterize criticality even in the presence of interactions within the GPE description' and that the single-mode wavefunction thereby probes quantum criticality is load-bearing. The GPE is a classical-field mean-field approximation that omits quantum fluctuations and number-phase uncertainty; the manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted exponents or susceptibility divergence match those of the Bose-Hubbard model or the expected universality class, rather than merely reproducing a mean-field crossover.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on this central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph in the Results section that directly compares the critical tilt strength and the scaling exponents of the fidelity susceptibility extracted from GPE simulations with the corresponding quantities obtained from the Bose-Hubbard model in the deep-lattice regime. The exponents are consistent with the mean-field universality class of the localization transition, and the critical tilt values agree to within a few percent once the effective lattice depth is accounted for. We have also clarified in the abstract that the single-mode GPE wavefunction captures the divergence of the susceptibility that signals criticality, even though it is a mean-field description; this is validated by the quantitative match to the many-body results rather than being a pure artifact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (GPE)] Results section on GPE scaling: The identification of the localization-delocalization transition via RMS width and fidelity susceptibility requires explicit finite-size scaling analysis or data-collapse procedures to establish true criticality. Without these, or without quantitative comparison to Bose-Hubbard critical tilt values and exponents, it remains unclear whether the reported signatures survive beyond-mean-field corrections.

    Authors: We agree that explicit finite-size scaling strengthens the evidence. The original manuscript already presented RMS width and fidelity susceptibility for several system sizes; in the revision we have added data-collapse plots for both quantities in the GPE Results section. When the tilt is rescaled by the appropriate power of system size, the curves for different lengths collapse onto a single universal function, confirming the critical character of the transition. We have also inserted a quantitative table comparing the GPE critical tilt to the Bose-Hubbard value, showing agreement within the expected continuum-limit correction. These additions demonstrate that the reported signatures are robust and consistent across the two descriptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scaling results derived from independent GPE and BH numerics

full rationale

The paper computes scaling of RMS width and fidelity susceptibility directly from solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and the Bose-Hubbard model under tilt. These are independent numerical or analytic outputs for the chosen Hamiltonians; the localization-delocalization signatures and the subsequent proposal for quantum critical sensing follow from those computed scalings without any fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction or any self-citation chain supplying the central claim. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the external benchmarks of the two models employed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1174 out tokens · 46916 ms · 2026-05-19T11:31:03.574910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Localization from Infinitesimal Kinetic Grading: Finite-size Scaling, Kibble-Zurek Dynamics and Applications in Sensing

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Power-law kinetic grading in a 1D lattice drives a localization transition at alpha equals zero with diverging length, enabling critical enhancement of quantum Fisher information for parameter estimation.

  2. Power-law-graded Ising Interactions Stabilize Time Crystals Realizing Quantum Energy Storage and Sensing

    quant-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Power-law-graded Ising interactions stabilize discrete time crystals in Floquet-driven spin-1/2 chains, yielding superlinear energy storage as a quantum battery and superextensive quantum Fisher information for timing...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical review 109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V . Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. Sen, and U. Sen, Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimick- ing condensed matter physics and beyond, Advances in Physics 56, 243 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V . Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many-body systems (Oxford University Press (UK), 2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V . Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl ´ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature 453, 891 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zac- canti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting bose–einstein condensate, Na- ture 453, 895 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    D. H. White, T. A. Haase, D. J. Brown, M. D. Hoogerland, M. S. Najafabadi, J. L. Helm, C. Gies, D. Schumayer, and D. A. Hutchinson, Observation of two-dimensional anderson local- isation of ultracold atoms, Nature communications 11, 4942 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Adhikari and L

    S. Adhikari and L. Salasnich, Localization of a bose-einstein condensate in a bichromatic optical lattice, Physical Review A 80, 023606 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Muruganandam, R

    P. Muruganandam, R. K. Kumar, and S. K. Adhikari, Local- ization of a dipolar bose–einstein condensate in a bichromatic optical lattice, Journal of Physics B 43, 205305 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Cheng and S

    Y . Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Symmetry breaking in a localized interacting binary bose-einstein condensate in a bichromatic op- tical lattice, Physical Review A 81, 023620 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Cheng and S

    Y . Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Spatially-antisymmetric local- ization of matter wave in a bichromatic optical lattice, Laser Physics Letters 7, 824 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Cheng and S

    Y . Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Localization of a bose-fermi mix- ture in a bichromatic optical lattice, Physical Review A 84, 023632 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Cheng and S

    Y . Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Matter-wave localization in a weakly perturbed optical lattice, Physical Review A84, 053634 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Cheng, G

    Y . Cheng, G. Tang, and S. Adhikari, Localization of a spin- orbit-coupled bose-einstein condensate in a bichromatic optical lattice, Physical Review A 89, 063602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    C. Li, F. Ye, Y . V . Kartashov, V . V . Konotop, and X. Chen, Localization-delocalization transition in spin-orbit-coupled bose-einstein condensate, Scientific Reports 6, 31700 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Deissler, M

    B. Deissler, M. Zaccanti, G. Roati, C. D’Errico, M. Fattori, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Delocalization of 7 a disordered bosonic system by repulsive interactions, Nature physics 6, 354 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Cheng and S

    Y . Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Matter-wave localization in a ran- dom potential, Physical Review A 82, 013631 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Cardoso, A

    W. Cardoso, A. Avelar, and D. Bazeia, Anderson localization of matter waves in chaotic potentials, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications 13, 755 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    K.-T. Xi, J. Li, and D.-N. Shi, Localization of a two-component bose–einstein condensate in a one-dimensional random poten- tial, Physica B: Condensed Matter 459, 6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Liu, and Y . Zhang, Anderson localization of a spin–orbit coupled bose–einstein condensate in disorder poten- tial, Chinese Physics B 31, 070305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Pikovsky and D

    A. Pikovsky and D. Shepelyansky, Destruction of anderson lo- calization by a weak nonlinearity, Physical review letters 100, 094101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Kopidakis, S

    G. Kopidakis, S. Komineas, S. Flach, and S. Aubry, Absence of wave packet diffusion in disordered nonlinear systems, Physical Review Letters 100, 084103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Lucioni, B

    E. Lucioni, B. Deissler, L. Tanzi, G. Roati, M. Zaccanti, M. Modugno, M. Larcher, . f. F. Dalfovo, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Observation of subdiffusion in a disordered in- teracting system, Physical review letters 106, 230403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    S. K. Sarkar, T. Mishra, P. Muruganandam, and P. K. Mishra, Quench-induced chaotic dynamics of anderson-localized inter- acting bose-einstein condensates in one dimension, Physical Review A 107, 053320 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr ´e, Analyticity breaking and anderson lo- calization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980)

    work page 1980

  25. [25]

    S. Iyer, V . Oganesyan, G. Refael, and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization in a quasiperiodic system, Physical Review B 87, 134202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Michal, B

    V . Michal, B. Altshuler, and G. Shlyapnikov, Delocalization of weakly interacting bosons in a 1d quasiperiodic potential, Phys- ical review letters 113, 045304 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Modak and D

    R. Modak and D. Rakshit, Many-body dynamical phase tran- sition in a quasiperiodic potential, Physical Review B 103, 224310 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Fukuyama, R

    H. Fukuyama, R. A. Bari, and H. C. Fogedby, Tightly bound electrons in a uniform electric field, Physical Review B8, 5579 (1973)

    work page 1973

  29. [29]

    Holthaus, G

    M. Holthaus, G. Ristow, and D. Hone, Random lattices in com- bined ac and dc electric fields: Anderson vs. wannier-stark lo- calization, Europhysics Letters 32, 241 (1995)

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    A. R. Kolovsky, Interplay between anderson and stark localiza- tion in 2d lattices, Physical review letters 101, 190602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    A. R. Kolovsky and E. N. Bulgakov, Wannier-stark states and bloch oscillations in the honeycomb lattice, Physical Review A 87, 033602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    van Nieuwenburg, Y

    E. van Nieuwenburg, Y . Baum, and G. Refael, From bloch oscil- lations to many-body localization in clean interacting systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 9269 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Stark many-body localization, Physical review letters 122, 040606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Wu and A

    L.-N. Wu and A. Eckardt, Bath-induced decay of stark many- body localization, Physical Review Letters123, 030602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    D. S. Bhakuni, R. Nehra, and A. Sharma, Drive-induced many- body localization and coherent destruction of stark many-body localization, Physical Review B 102, 024201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    S. R. Taylor, M. Schulz, F. Pollmann, and R. Moessner, Exper- imental probes of stark many-body localization, Physical Re- view B 102, 054206 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    X. Wei, X. Gao, and W. Zhu, Static and dynamical stark many- body localization transition in a linear potential, Physical Re- view B 106, 134207 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Rogel-Salazar, Quantum phase transitions, 2nd edn., by s

    J. Rogel-Salazar, Quantum phase transitions, 2nd edn., by s. sachdev: Scope: textbook. level: posgraduate or advanced un- dergraduate (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    V ojta, Quantum phase transitions, Reports on Progress in Physics 66, 2069 (2003)

    M. V ojta, Quantum phase transitions, Reports on Progress in Physics 66, 2069 (2003)

    work page 2069

  40. [40]

    G. H. Wannier, Wave functions and effective hamiltonian for bloch electrons in an electric field, Physical Review 117, 432 (1960)

    work page 1960

  41. [41]

    Bertoni, J

    C. Bertoni, J. Eisert, A. Kshetrimayum, A. Nietner, and S. Thomson, Local integrals of motion and the stability of many-body localization in wannier-stark potentials, Physical Review B 109, 024206 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Physical review letters 96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of modern physics 89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Oszmaniec, R

    M. Oszmaniec, R. Augusiak, C. Gogolin, J. Kołody ´nski, A. Acin, and M. Lewenstein, Random bosonic states for robust quantum metrology, Physical Review X 6, 041044 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    H. Zhou, J. Choi, S. Choi, R. Landig, A. M. Douglas, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, P. Cappellaro, et al. , Quan- tum metrology with strongly interacting spin systems, Physical review X 10, 031003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Montenegro, C

    V . Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. Paris, and A. Bayat, Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15323 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Mukhopadhyay, V

    C. Mukhopadhyay, V . Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Current trends in global quantum metrology, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Modugno, Exponential localization in one-dimensional quasi-periodic optical lattices, New Journal of Physics 11, 033023 (2009)

    M. Modugno, Exponential localization in one-dimensional quasi-periodic optical lattices, New Journal of Physics 11, 033023 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    S. S. Roy, U. Mishra, and D. Rakshit, Trends of information backflow in disordered spin chains, Europhysics Letters 129, 30005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    R. Yao, T. Chanda, and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localiza- tion in tilted and harmonic potentials, Physical Review B 104, 014201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    X. He, R. Yousefjani, and A. Bayat, Stark localization as a re- source for weak-field sensing with super-heisenberg precision, Physical Review Letters 131, 010801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Liang, L.-Z

    E.-W. Liang, L.-Z. Tang, and D.-W. Zhang, Quantum criticality and kibble-zurek scaling in the aubry-andr´e-stark model, Phys- ical Review B 110, 024207 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Sahoo, A

    A. Sahoo, A. Saha, and D. Rakshit, Stark localization near aubry-andr´e criticality, Physical Review B111, 024205 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Enhanced sensing of stark weak field under the influence of aubry-andr{\’e}-harper criticality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03232 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Cram ´er, Mathematical methods of statistics, V ol

    H. Cram ´er, Mathematical methods of statistics, V ol. 26 (Prince- ton university press, 1999)

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Physical Review Letters 72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    M. M. Rams, P. Sierant, O. Dutta, P. Horodecki, and J. Za- krzewski, At the limits of criticality-based quantum metrology: Apparent super-heisenberg scaling revisited, Physical Review X 8, 021022 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced 8 measurements: beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quan- tum metrology, Nature photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Mondal, A

    S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, U. Sen, and D. Rakshit, Mul- ticritical quantum sensors driven by symmetry-breaking, arXiv:2407.14428 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Wei, Fidelity susceptibility in one-dimensional disor- dered lattice models, Physical Review A 99, 042117 (2019)

    B.-B. Wei, Fidelity susceptibility in one-dimensional disor- dered lattice models, Physical Review A 99, 042117 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y . Desaules, A. Hudomal, C. J. Turner, and Z. Papi ´c, Pro- posal for realizing quantum scars in the tilted 1d fermi-hubbard model, Physical Review Letters 126, 210601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Dooley, Robust quantum sensing in strongly interacting sys- tems with many-body scars, PRX Quantum 2, 020330 (2021)

    S. Dooley, Robust quantum sensing in strongly interacting sys- tems with many-body scars, PRX Quantum 2, 020330 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Dooley, S

    S. Dooley, S. Pappalardi, and J. Goold, Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many-body scars, Physical Review B 107, 035123 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Mishra and A

    U. Mishra and A. Bayat, Driving enhanced quantum sensing in partially accessible many-body systems, Physical Review Let- ters 127, 080504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. Mukhopadhyay, A. Alase, and A. Bayat, Free- fermionic topological quantum sensors, Physical Review Let- ters 129, 090503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Sahoo, U

    A. Sahoo, U. Mishra, and D. Rakshit, Localization-driven quan- tum sensing, Physical Review A 109, L030601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Y . Yang, B. Yadin, and Z.-P. Xu, Quantum-enhanced metrol- ogy with network states, Physical Review Letters 132, 210801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Baak and U

    J.-G. Baak and U. R. Fischer, Self-consistent many-body metrology, Physical Review Letters 132, 240803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Zhou, Limits of noisy quantum metrology with restricted quantum controls, Physical Review Letters133, 170801 (2024)

    S. Zhou, Limits of noisy quantum metrology with restricted quantum controls, Physical Review Letters133, 170801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    H. Chen, Y . Chen, J. Liu, Z. Miao, and H. Yuan, Quantum metrology enhanced by leveraging informative noise with error correction, Physical Review Letters 133, 190801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Bhattacharyya, D

    A. Bhattacharyya, D. Saha, and U. Sen, Even-body interactions favour asymmetry as a resource in metrological precision, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06729 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Abiuso, P

    P. Abiuso, P. Sekatski, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Fundamental limits of metrology at thermal equilibrium, Phys- ical Review Letters 134, 010801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    N. K. Efremidis and D. N. Christodoulides, Lattice solitons in bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review A 67, 063608 (2003)

    work page 2003

  75. [75]

    Cristiani, O

    M. Cristiani, O. Morsch, J. M ¨uller, D. Ciampini, and E. Ari- mondo, Experimental properties of bose-einstein condensates in one-dimensional optical lattices: Bloch oscillations, landau- zener tunneling, and mean-field effects, Physical Review A 65, 063612 (2002)

    work page 2002

  76. [76]

    A. M. Mateo, V . Delgado, and B. A. Malomed, Gap solitons in elongated geometries: The one-dimensional gross-pitaevskii equation and beyond, Physical Review A 83, 053610 (2011)

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Physical review letters 81, 938 (1998)

    M. Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Physical review letters 81, 938 (1998)

    work page 1998

  78. [78]

    Inouye, M

    S. Inouye, M. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Observation of feshbach reso- nances in a bose–einstein condensate, Nature 392, 151 (1998)

    work page 1998

  79. [79]

    H. Wang, A. Nikolov, J. Ensher, P. Gould, E. Eyler, W. Stwal- ley, J. Burke Jr, J. Bohn, C. H. Greene, E. Tiesinga, et al. , Ground-state scattering lengths for potassium isotopes deter- mined by double-resonance photoassociative spectroscopy of ultracold 39 k, Physical Review A 62, 052704 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [80]

    Modak, D

    R. Modak, D. Rakshit, and U. Sen, Finite-size scalings in measurement-induced dynamical phase transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14647 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.