Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Engineering a Correlated Narrow-Gap Semiconductor: Effects of Ga Substitution in EuZn$_2$P$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gallium substitution transforms the magnetic Zintl semiconductor EuZn2P2 into a correlated narrow-gap semiconductor with a 63 meV gap, ~24-fold higher conductivity, and preserved 90% negative magnetoresistance.

desk verdict Useful multi-probe dataset and a plausible qualitative story, but the Ga-incorporation claim is not established and several quantitative claims are softer than they look. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.17123 v1 pith:OYMXKJCC submitted 2025-12-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

M. Dutra , E. Marulanda , G. G. Vasques , J. F. Oliveira , P. C. Sabino , R. B. Delgado , L. Mendonça-Fereira , A. R. V. Benvenho
show 6 more authors
E. Baggio-Saitovitch R. K. Machado N. M. Kawahala J. Munevar M. A. Avila F. G. G. Hernandez
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Zintlphasenarrow-gapsemiconductorgalliumsubstitutionmagnetoresistancemagneticpolaronsterahertzspectroscopyelectronspinresonancecarrierdoping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Substituting one in ten zinc atoms with gallium in the layered magnetic Zintl phase EuZn2P2 is shown to narrow the semiconducting gap by about 45% (to roughly 63 meV) and to increase the room-temperature Drude conductivity by nearly a factor of 24. Transport, electron spin resonance, and terahertz spectroscopy all point to a substantial increase in mobile carriers, while the europium moments retain their identity and the material still shows about 90% negative magnetoresistance at 45 K. The authors interpret the preserved magnetoresistance as evidence that magnetic-polaron physics survives moderate carrier doping. The paper's broad claim is that Ga substitution turns EuZn2P2 into a tunable correlated narrow-gap magnetic semiconductor, which matters for spintronics, infrared optoelectronics, and low-energy quantum detectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Ga3+-for-Zn2+ substitution in the [Zn2P2] framework, which is supposed to inject extra carriers into the tetrahedral network. The paper's argument is carried by three signatures that independently point to increased carrier density: the Drude term in the THz optical conductivity, the Dysonian ESR lineshape (with its reduced intensity and diffusive contribution), and the shift in transport activation gap. On the magnetoresistance side, the Khosla-Fischer model for spin-disorder scattering serves as the quantitative link between the negative MR and short-range magnetic correlations, with magnetic-polaron formation invoked at low temperature.

What would settle it

Perform a Hall-effect measurement and a direct chemical analysis (e.g., energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) on the same EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 crystals. If the Hall carrier density does not increase roughly in proportion to the nominal 20% Ga doping, or if the Ga is not located on Zn sites, the substitution-driven interpretation would be undermined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that a nominal 20% Ga-for-Zn substitution in EuZn2P2 produces a comprehensive electronic reconstruction: the lattice expands by about 1%, the activated transport gap drops to Egap = 63 meV, and the THz-derived dc conductivity increases from 0.29 to 6.8 Ω^-1 cm^-1, with the carrier scattering time growing from roughly 0.02 to 0.4 ps. ESR shows a clear Lorentzian-to-Dysonian crossover and reduced intensity, consistent with a smaller skin depth and a higher density of conduction electrons. The substituted material retains ~90% negative magnetoresistance at 45 K, which the authors attribute to magnetic polarons and short-range correlations, and they fit the field dependence

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on gallium actually occupying zinc sites in the [Zn2P2] framework, which is inferred from a ~1% lattice expansion and absence of impurity phases in powder XRD, but no direct elemental or site-occupancy measurement is presented.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the gap reduction is real and controllable, EuZn2-xGaxP2 becomes a candidate narrow-gap magnetic semiconductor for mid/far-infrared photodetection and possibly for low-threshold quantum sensing applications.
  • Preserving ~90% negative magnetoresistance with added carriers suggests that magnetic-polaron effects can coexist with moderate doping, which is relevant for spin-valve and spintronic designs.
  • The Drude conductivity enhancement and the longer scattering time (from ~0.02 to ~0.4 ps) indicate that doping not only adds carriers but also improves low-energy transport, which could benefit THz-range devices.
  • The suppression of the Eu phonon near 3.08 THz in the doped compound shows that carrier absorption can dominate the low-energy optical spectrum, a caution for interpreting THz responses of doped Zintl phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the effective mass were to change with Ga content, the reported carrier-density difference (only ~20% when using m* = 0.106) could be underestimated; Hall measurements on the same crystals would resolve the actual carrier concentration.
  • A direct chemical probe, such as EDX or site-occupancy refinement, would verify whether the observed effects stem from Ga on the Zn sublattice or from growth-induced vacancies; without it, the lattice-expansion argument remains indirect.
  • The Khosla-Fischer model's success at intermediate temperatures but not at low T hints that the material might show an even richer phase diagram at higher Ga contents, though the paper notes solubility limits.
  • The paper treats the magnetic and charge sectors as coupled ('correlated'); an editorial extension is that systematic substitution series (e.g., Al or In for Zn) could map out a family of narrow-gap magnetic semiconductors with similar tunability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of nominally EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 single crystals by Sn flux and characterizes them via powder X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, magnetoresistance, ESR, and THz time-domain spectroscopy. The authors claim that Ga substitution on Zn sites increases the free-carrier density, narrows the semiconducting gap to Egap = 63 meV, approximately doubles the THz Drude weight, increases the carrier scattering time, and preserves a large negative magnetoresistance (~90% at 45 K). The qualitative picture is supported by multiple probes, and the Drude-Lorentz and Khosla-Fischer models are applied transparently. However, the quantitative support for the central composition-structure-property claim is weakened by the lack of direct chemical or site-occupancy analysis of Ga incorporation, an Arrhenius gap without uncertainty, and Drude-weight values that overlap within error.

Significance. If the central attribution is correct, the paper demonstrates a simple chemical-substitution route to a correlated narrow-gap magnetic semiconductor with tunable carrier density and preserved magnetoresistance, which is of interest for optoelectronic and low-threshold sensing applications. The study's main strength is its multi-probe experimental approach: transport, ESR, and THz-TDS independently point toward increased free-carrier response and reduced skin depth in the substituted material, and the fitting models are explicit. The main weakness is that the load-bearing claim of Ga-on-Zn substitution is not directly verified, so the observed property changes could in principle arise from growth-related defects or flux incorporation. The quantitative claims regarding gap narrowing and carrier-density enhancement are also less secure than the text suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 / Fig. 1] The central attribution of all subsequent effects to Ga substitution on Zn sites rests on the nominal stoichiometry and a ~1% lattice expansion. No EDX/WDS/XRF or Rietveld site-occupancy refinement is reported. The volume change (101.0±0.8 to 101.9±0.3 Å^3) is only about one combined standard deviation, and the expansion is opposite to the naive ionic-radius expectation for Ga3+ vs Zn2+, so the interpretation relies on an ad hoc electronic-reorganization argument. Since Ref. [11] shows that Eu-vacancy differences from flux growth can switch the ground state between AFM semiconductor and metallic ferromagnet, Sn intercalation or vacancies could in principle produce the same enhanced conductivity, Dysonian ESR, and THz response. This must be checked before the central claim is accepted.
  2. [Sec. 2.2 / Fig. 3b] Egap = 63 meV is extracted from an Arrhenius fit with no uncertainty, no stated fit range, and no simultaneous measurement of the pristine sample under identical conditions. The 'reduction of ~45%' is computed against a literature spread of 100–350 meV, so the quantitative narrowing claim is not established by this analysis. The comparison is also made between two-contact (pristine) and four-contact (substituted) resistivity protocols; please provide at least the fit error, fit range, and a consistent baseline.
  3. [Sec. 2.4 / Table 2] The N/m* values (5.1±2.6)×10^16 and (6.0±3.1)×10^16 cm^-3 overlap within their uncertainties; the inferred carrier densities N = 5.4×10^15 and 6.4×10^15 cm^-3 differ by only ~18% when the same m* = 0.106 is used. The sentence 'These results clearly demonstrate an enhanced carrier concentration' therefore overstates this metric. The paper can still support a qualitative increase through σ0 and τ, but the quantitative N/m* evidence is not statistically significant and the equal-effective-mass assumption is untested. Please report the propagated uncertainty in N/m* and temper the carrier-density claim accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1] Ionic radii are given as '0.62 vs. 0.74 pm'; these values should be in Å (or nm), otherwise they are too small by a factor of 100.
  2. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption lists 'EuZn1.8Zn0.2P2' in the legend; this should read 'EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2'.
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The statement 'At 45 K and 50 K, MR decreases by approximately 40% ... following n = 1.5 in the power law MR = AH^n' is ambiguous: please define H units, specify the field range of the fit, and indicate whether n is obtained from a log-log fit.
  4. [Experimental Section] Minor language issues: 'were weighted' should be 'were weighed', and 'measurements was carried out' should be 'measurements were carried out'.
  5. [Eq. (5)] The Khosla-Fischer expression for b^2 is difficult to parse in the current typesetting; please check the exponent and brackets, and ensure all symbols (J, g0, α, η(EF)) are defined exactly where introduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Egap, Drude parameters, MR, and ESR features are measured or fitted quantities; self-citations are context/method only and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. The energy gap Egap = 63 meV is obtained from an Arrhenius fit to the measured resistivity of EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 (Fig. 3), and the ~45% reduction is a comparison against literature values for pristine EuZn2P2; the fitted value is not an input. The 90% negative magnetoresistance at 45 K is directly measured, and the Khosla-Fischer parameters (a, b) are free parameters fitted to the data, not assumed outcomes. The Dysonian ESR lineshape and reduced ESR intensity are direct observations; the skin-depth/carrier-density interpretation is an inference, but it does not enter the extraction of Egap or Drude parameters. In the THz analysis, sigma0 and tau are independent Drude-Lorentz fit parameters, and N/m* = sigma0/(e^2*tau) is just an algebraic rearrangement of those fitted parameters; although the quoted N/m* values overlap within uncertainty (5.1 +/- 2.6 vs 6.0 +/- 3.1 x 10^16 cm^-3), the central conductivity enhancement (sigma0 = 6.8 vs 0.29 Ohm^-1 cm^-1) is directly fitted to the measured spectra. The effective mass m* = 0.106 used for the carrier-density conversion is taken from the external Ref. [38], not from the paper's own conclusions, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that possible m* changes could alter the carrier-density estimate. Self-citations (Refs. [14] and [34]) concern prior photoresponse context and the THz extraction procedure; they are not load-bearing for the claim that Ga substitution narrows the gap or enhances free-carrier response. The weakest point, namely that Ga incorporation is inferred mainly from a ~1% lattice expansion and absence of secondary phases, is a physical/chemical assumption that could be challenged by composition analysis, but it is not a circular step: no fitted or predicted output is defined in terms of that assumption. Thus there is no derivation that reduces by construction or through a self-citation chain to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental characterization; its quantitative conclusions rest on fitted transport/optical parameters and on literature values. The main unverified input is the actual Ga content/site occupancy, which is assumed from nominal synthesis and lattice expansion.

free parameters (6)
  • E_gap (activation energy from Arrhenius fit) = 63 meV
    Obtained by linear fit to ln ρ vs 1/T in Fig. 3b; no uncertainty reported. Used to claim a ~45% narrowing relative to literature gaps.
  • Drude dc conductivity σ0 = 0.29 ± 0.02 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹ (pristine); 6.8 ± 0.9 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹ (Ga-substituted)
    Fit parameter in Eq. 13; supports the 24× conductivity increase.
  • Drude scattering time τ = 0.02 ± 0.01 ps (pristine); 0.4 ± 0.2 ps (Ga-substituted)
    Fit parameter in Eq. 13; large increase drives most of the conductivity enhancement.
  • Lorentz phonon parameters = νL = 3.085 ± 0.002 THz, γL = 2.14 ± 0.04 THz
    Fit to phonon resonance in σ1(ν) (Eq. 14).
  • Khosla–Fischer coefficients a and b = a = 0.18–0.31, b = 0.37–1.61 Oe⁻¹ between 45 and 100 K
    Fitted to negative MR using Eq. 2; interpreted as spin-disorder scattering parameters.
  • Effective mass m* = 0.106 (assumed for both compounds, taken from Ref. [38])
    Needed to convert Drude weight N/m* into carrier density; if m* changes on doping, the inferred carrier-density comparison changes.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ga3+ substitution at Zn sites injects one additional electron into the [Zn2P2]^2− framework (Zintl electron counting)
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to explain lattice expansion and carrier increase; not directly verified by composition analysis.
  • domain assumption Arrhenius law describes the resistivity in the activated regime and the fitted activation energy equals the semiconducting gap
    Used in Section 2.2/Fig. 3b to claim E_gap = 63 meV.
  • domain assumption The Drude–Lorentz model (Eqs. 12–14) captures the THz conductivity and the extracted σ0 and τ are physically meaningful
    Used in Section 2.4 to extract carrier parameters from optical conductivity.
  • domain assumption The effective mass m* = 0.106 from pristine EuZn2P2 [38] remains unchanged in EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2
    Used in Section 2.4 to convert N/m* to carrier density; authors acknowledge possible m* changes.
  • domain assumption Khosla–Fischer model describes the negative MR in terms of spin-disorder scattering
    Used in Section 2.2 to support magnetic-polaron/short-range magnetic correlation interpretation.
  • domain assumption Standard slab approximation for THz transmittance (Eqs. 9–10) applies to these samples
    Used in Section 2.4 to retrieve n, κ and permittivity from measured transmittance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Engineering a Correlated Narrow-Gap Semiconductor: Effects of Ga Substitution in EuZn$_2$P$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OYMXKJCC

@misc{pith2026251217123,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Engineering a Correlated Narrow-Gap Semiconductor: Effects of Ga Substitution in EuZn$_2$P$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OYMXKJCC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.17123}
}
abstract

The effect of Ga substitution on the electronic, magnetic, and low-energy responses of the Zintl phase EuZn$_2$P$_2$ is investigated by electrical transport, electron spin resonance (ESR), and terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS). Incorporating Ga into EuZn$_2$P$_2$ (EuZn$_{1.8}$Ga$_{0.2}$P$_2$) reduces the electrical resistivity, indicating enhanced free-carrier density and a narrowed semiconducting gap. ESR confirms the persistence of Eu$^{2+}$ moments while showing a crossover from a Lorentzian to a Dysonian lineshape, consistent with reduced skin depth, increased carrier density, and the emergence of diffusive contributions. Ga-substituted compound display pronounced negative magnetoresistance linked to magnetic-polaron formation. THz-TDS reveals strong low-frequency absorption and a notable enhancement of the Drude conductivity in the substituted material, together with an increased carrier scattering time and enhanced carrier-density--to--effective-mass ratio. These results demonstrate that Ga substitution tunes charge transport, carrier dynamics, and short-range magnetic correlations in EuZn$_2$P$_2$, establishing EuZn$_{1.8}$Ga$_{0.2}$P$_2$ as a promising platform for engineering correlated narrow-gap magnetic semiconductors with enhanced electronic and spin-dependent functionalities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17123 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. powder X-ray diffraction pattern of crushed single crystals of a) EuZn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the electrical resistances of EuZn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Electrical resistivity of EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 from 45 to 300 K. At least three distinct transport regimes can be identified in this temperature range. b) Arrhenius plot with linear fitting, yielding an estimated energy gap of approxi￾mately 63 meV. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Isothermal magnetoresistance of EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 with i ⊥ c and H ∥ c at various temperatures. a) MR as a func￾tion of applied magnetic field from 0 to 9 T. b) MR as a function of (µ0H) 2 . 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: ESR spectra at 300 K under various microwave powers for EuZn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) The Lorentzian lineshape is typical of insulating materials, where the microwave penetration depth is much [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ESR spectra of EuZn2P2 (blue) and EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 (black) for a) H ∥ ab and b) H ∥ c at 300 K, measured with P = 20 mW and ν = 9.5 GHz. The red curve is the fit using the model presented in Equation 6. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: ESR intensity as a function of P 1/2 for EuZn2P2 (blue) and EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 (black) with H ∥ c and H ∥ ab. Lines are a guide to the eye. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: a) Transmittance spectrum at 295 K for EuZn2P2 (blue) and EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 (black), measured by tera￾hertz time-domain spectroscopy. The inset shows the corresponding time-domain electric-field waveforms, with the EuZn1.8Ga0.2P2 signal scaled by 10× for clarity. b) Real …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Colossal Terahertz Magnetoresistance from Magnetic Polarons in EuZn$_2$P$_2$

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EuZn2P2 shows colossal ~90% negative magnetoresistance at 1.5 THz, attributed to field-driven reshaping of magnetic-polaron conductivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [11]

    X. Chen, W. Yang, J.-Y. Lu, Z. Zhou, Z. Ren, G.-H. Cao, S. Dong, Z.-C. Wang,Physical Review B 2024,109, 18 L180410. 9

    2024

  2. [1]

    Shuai, J

    J. Shuai, J. Mao, S. Song, Q. Zhang, G. Chen, Z. Ren,Materials Today Physics2017,174

  3. [2]

    Freer, D

    R. Freer, D. Ekren, T. Ghosh, K. Biswas, P. Qiu, S. Wan, L. Chen, S. Han, C. Fu, T. Zhu, et al., Journal of Physics: Energy2022,4, 2 022002

  4. [3]

    J. H. Westbrook, R. L. Fleischer,Intermetallic compounds: principles and practice,1995

    1995

  5. [4]

    Z.-C. Wang, J. D. Rogers, X. Yao, R. Nichols, K. Atay, B. Xu, J. Franklin, I. Sochnikov, P. J. Ryan, D. Haskel, et al.,Advanced Materials2021,33, 10 2005755

  6. [5]

    J.-Z. Ma, S. Nie, C. Yi, J. Jandke, T. Shang, M.-Y. Yao, M. Naamneh, L. Yan, Y. Sun, A. Chikina, et al.,Science Advances2019,5, 7 eaaw4718

  7. [6]

    F. Du, L. Yang, Z. Nie, N. Wu, Y. Li, S. Luo, Y. Chen, D. Su, M. Smidman, Y. Shi, et al.,npj Quantum Materials2022,7, 1 65

  8. [7]

    S. Luo, Y. Xu, F. Du, L. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Cao, Y. Song, H. Yuan,Physical Review B2023,108, 20 205140

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    Berry, V

    T. Berry, V. J. Stewart, B. W. Redemann, C. Lygouras, N. Varnava, D. Vanderbilt, T. M. Mc- Queen,Physical Review B2022,106, 5 054420

  2. [9]

    Berry, S

    T. Berry, S. R. Parkin, T. M. McQueen,Physical Review Materials2021,5, 11 114401

  3. [10]

    Krebber, M

    S. Krebber, M. Kopp, C. Garg, K. Kummer, J. Sichelschmidt, S. Schulz, G. Poelchen, M. Mende, K. Warawa, M. D. Thomson, et al.,arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.145392023

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Singh, S

    K. Singh, S. Dan, A. Ptok, T. Zaleski, O. Pavlosiuk, P. Wiśniewski, D. Kaczorowski,Physical Re- view B2023,108, 5 054402

  5. [13]

    Rybicki, K

    D. Rybicki, K. Komędera, J. Przewoźnik, L. Gondek, C. Kapusta, K. Podgórska, W. Tabiś, J. Żukrowski, L. M. Tran, M. Babij, Z. Bukowski, L. Havela, V. Buturlim, J. Prchal, M. Diviš, P. Král, I. Turek, I. Halevy, J. Kastil, M. Mišek, U. Dutta, D. Legut,Phys. Rev. B2024,110, 1 014421

  6. [14]

    Dutra, G

    M. Dutra, G. Vasques, P. Sabino, J. Dias, J. Oliveira, M. Heringer, M. Cabrera-Baez, E. Baggio- Saitovitch, A. Benvenho, M. Avila, et al.,arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.076812025

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    S. Chen, Y. Fu, M. Ishaq, C. Li, D. Ren, Z. Su, X. Qiao, P. Fan, G. Liang, J. Tang,InfoMat2023, 5, 4 e12400

  8. [16]

    X. Lian, L. Luo, M. Dong, Z. Miao, X. Qi, Z. Cai, L. Wang,Journal of Materials Science2024,59, 47 21581

  9. [17]

    M. Long, P. Wang, H. Fang, W. Hu,Advanced Functional Materials2019,29, 19 1803807

  10. [18]

    Garrett, G

    K. Garrett, G. D¯ uda,Advances in Astronomy2011,2011, 1 968283

    2011

  11. [19]

    Bertone, T

    G. Bertone, T. M. Tait,Nature2018,562, 7725 51

  12. [20]

    Roszkowski, E

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, S. Trojanowski,Reports on Progress in Physics2018,81, 6 066201

  13. [21]

    Sikivie,Physical Review Letters1983,51, 16 1415

    P. Sikivie,Physical Review Letters1983,51, 16 1415

  14. [22]

    Sikivie,Reviews of Modern Physics2021,93, 1 015004

    P. Sikivie,Reviews of Modern Physics2021,93, 1 015004

  15. [23]

    Abbamonte, A

    P. Abbamonte, A. Albert, D. Alves, J. Anczarski, T. Aralis, T. Böhm, C. Boyd, J. Chen, P.-H. Chu, M. Cook, et al.,arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.177822025

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    A. M. Goforth, H. Hope, C. L. Condron, S. M. Kauzlarich, N. Jensen, P. Klavins, S. MaQuilon, Z. Fisk,Chemistry of Materials2009,21, 19 4480

  17. [25]

    M. S. Cook, E. A. Peterson, C. S. Kengle, E. Kennedy, J. Sheeran, C. Girod, G. Freitas, S. M. Greer, P. Abbamonte, P. Pagliuso, et al.,arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.054942025

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    R. P. Khosla, J. R. Fischer,Phys. Rev. B1970,24084

  19. [27]

    Sichelschmidt, P

    J. Sichelschmidt, P. Chailloleau, S. Krebber, A. E. Mard, C. Krellner, K. Kliemt,arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.060602025

  20. [28]

    J. C. Souza, G. G. Lesseux, R. R. Urbano, C. Rettori, P. Pagliuso,AIP Advances2018,8, 5

  21. [29]

    Feher, A

    G. Feher, A. Kip,Physical Review1955,98, 2 337

  22. [30]

    F. J. Dyson,Phys. Rev.1955,98349

    1955

  23. [31]

    Abragam, B

    A. Abragam, B. Bleaney,Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions, International Series of Monographs on Physics. Clarendon Press,1970

    1970

  24. [32]

    Cabrera-Baez, A

    M. Cabrera-Baez, A. Naranjo-Uribe, J. Osorio-Guillén, C. Rettori, M. Avila,Physical Review B 2015,92, 21 214414

    2015

  25. [33]

    G. G. Lesseux, T. M. Garitezi, P. F. S. Rosa, C. B. R. de Jesus, S. Oseroff, J. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, R. Urbano, P. Pagliuso, C. Rettori,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2016,28, 12 125601

  26. [34]

    Marulanda, F

    E. Marulanda, F. L. Costa, N. M. Kawahala, F. G. G. Hernandez,J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves2025,46, 10

  27. [35]

    J. Neu, C. A. Schmuttenmaer,Journal of Applied Physics2018,124, 23 231101. 10

  28. [36]

    N. M. Kawahala, D. A. Matos, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, A. Baydin, J. Kono, F. G. G. Hernan- dez,Coatings2023,13, 11 1855

  29. [37]

    Lloyd-Hughes, T.-I

    J. Lloyd-Hughes, T.-I. Jeon,J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves2012,33, 9 871

  30. [38]

    Krebber, M

    S. Krebber, M. Kopp, C. Garg, K. Kummer, J. Sichelschmidt, S. Schulz, G. Poelchen, M. Mende, A. V. Virovets, K. Warawa, M. D. Thomson, A. V. Tarasov, D. Y. Usachov, D. V. Vyalikh, H. G. Roskos, J. Müller, C. Krellner, K. Kliemt,Phys. Rev. B2023,108045116

  31. [39]

    E. D. Stefanato, N. M. Kawahala, B. A. Kawata, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, F. G. G. Hernandez, Communications Physics2025,8419. 2 03 04 05 06 07 0/s8722/s50/s48/s48/s480200040006000800010000120002 03 04 05 06 07 0/s8722/s50/s48/s48/s48020004000600080001000012000 Obs Fit EuZn2 ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.