pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.18328 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.quant-gas

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On the origin of energy gaps in quasicrystalline potentials

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quasicrystalsenergy gapsconfiguration spacetight-binding modelWannier functionshybridizationintegrated density of statesaperiodic order
0
0 comments X

The pith

Energy gaps in quasicrystals arise from resonant hybridization between increasingly distant neighboring sites that pins the integrated density of states to specific irrational areas in configuration space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a configuration-space framework to predict the locations and origins of energy gaps in quasicrystalline potentials, bypassing the limitations of finite-size real-space calculations. It establishes that these gaps form a hierarchy generated by resonant hybridization of sites that become neighbors at successive distances in configuration space. The framework fixes the integrated density of states below each gap at particular irrational values. Large-scale simulations of a lowest-band tight-binding model constructed from localized Wannier functions confirm the predictions with high accuracy. This approach enables direct statements about the infinite-size limit where conventional band theory fails for aperiodic order.

Core claim

A hierarchy of gaps stems from resonant hybridization between increasingly distant neighboring sites, pinning the integrated density of states below these gaps to specific irrational areas in configuration space. The configuration-space framework predicts the positions and origins of the gaps exactly, and large-scale simulations of a lowest-band tight-binding model built from localized Wannier functions show excellent agreement with these predictions.

What carries the argument

Configuration-space framework that identifies resonant hybridizations between sites at increasing distances and maps them to gaps that pin the integrated density of states at irrational values.

If this is right

  • Gap positions and the associated irrational pinning values of the integrated density of states are determined exactly for any quasicrystalline potential in the infinite-size limit.
  • The hierarchy of gaps can be generated systematically by considering successive levels of hybridization between more distant neighbors.
  • The lowest-band tight-binding model suffices to reproduce the full gap structure once the configuration-space predictions are applied.
  • Quantum properties of quasicrystals become accessible to analytic treatment beyond finite-size numerics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hybridization mechanism may classify gaps in other aperiodic or quasiperiodic potentials where real-space numerics are intractable.
  • Experimental spectra could be checked for the predicted irrational pinning values to test whether the configuration-space description survives disorder or interactions.
  • The framework suggests a route to engineer specific gap sequences by tuning the underlying quasiperiodic potential parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The configuration-space framework together with the lowest-band tight-binding model from localized Wannier functions remains accurate in the infinite-size limit without additional finite-size corrections or higher-band effects.

What would settle it

A direct numerical or experimental measurement showing that the integrated density of states below a predicted gap deviates from the specific irrational area fixed by the configuration-space calculation in the thermodynamic limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.18328 by David Gr\"oters, Emmanuel Gottlob, Ulrich Schneider.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quasicrystals, structures that are ordered yet aperiodic, defy conventional band theory, confining most studies to finite-size real-space numerics. We overcome this limitation with a configuration-space framework that predicts and explains the positions and origins of energy gaps in quasicrystalline potentials. We find that a hierarchy of gaps stems from resonant hybridization between increasingly distant neighboring sites, pinning the integrated density of states below these gaps to specific irrational areas in configuration space. Large-scale simulations of a lowest-band tight-binding model built from localized Wannier functions show excellent agreement with these predictions. By moving beyond finite-size numerics, this study advances the understanding of quasicrystalline potentials, paving the way for new explorations of their quantum properties in the infinite-size limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a configuration-space framework to predict and explain energy gaps in quasicrystalline potentials. It claims that a hierarchy of gaps arises from resonant hybridization between increasingly distant neighboring sites, which pins the integrated density of states (IDOS) below the gaps to specific irrational areas in configuration space. This is supported by large-scale simulations of a lowest-band tight-binding model constructed from localized Wannier functions, which show excellent agreement with the analytic predictions and extend the analysis beyond finite-size real-space numerics.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a meaningful advance by providing an analytic route to the infinite-size limit of quasicrystalline spectra, where conventional band theory fails. The configuration-space approach and its agreement with TB numerics could enable new explorations of quantum properties in aperiodic systems, particularly if the framework proves robust against higher-band effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (numerical validation): The reported agreement is exclusively between the configuration-space predictions and finite-size lowest-band TB numerics. No direct comparison is shown to the full continuous Schrödinger operator on the same approximants, leaving open whether band mixing or non-local effects from the aperiodic potential become significant in the thermodynamic limit. This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that the TB model faithfully reproduces the potential.
  2. [§3] §3 (hybridization rules and IDOS pinning): The derivation that resonant hybridization pins the IDOS to exact irrational areas lacks explicit step-by-step algebra, error bounds, or rules for excluding non-resonant contributions. Without these, it is unclear whether the predictions are truly parameter-free or whether normalization choices in the configuration-space areas are tuned to the quantities being predicted.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'excellent agreement' is used without reference to quantitative metrics (e.g., RMS deviation or R² values) or specific figures/tables that display the comparison.
  2. [§2] Notation: The definition of the configuration-space areas and the precise meaning of 'irrational areas' should be stated explicitly in a dedicated equation or table to avoid ambiguity when comparing to IDOS values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the detailed, constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: §4 (numerical validation): The reported agreement is exclusively between the configuration-space predictions and finite-size lowest-band TB numerics. No direct comparison is shown to the full continuous Schrödinger operator on the same approximants, leaving open whether band mixing or non-local effects from the aperiodic potential become significant in the thermodynamic limit. This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that the TB model faithfully reproduces the potential.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of a direct comparison to the full continuous Schrödinger operator. The tight-binding model is constructed from maximally localized Wannier functions extracted from the continuous potential, which by construction captures the low-energy sector with exponentially small errors due to localization. The configuration-space predictions are formulated for this effective model, and the reported large-scale TB simulations already demonstrate convergence to the analytic IDOS values beyond finite-size real-space limits. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §4 (and a supporting estimate in the methods) quantifying the expected band-mixing corrections from the Wannier localization length, thereby clarifying why the TB faithfully reproduces the potential for the gaps under consideration. A full-operator comparison on large approximants lies outside the present scope but is not required to substantiate the central claims. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §3 (hybridization rules and IDOS pinning): The derivation that resonant hybridization pins the IDOS to exact irrational areas lacks explicit step-by-step algebra, error bounds, or rules for excluding non-resonant contributions. Without these, it is unclear whether the predictions are truly parameter-free or whether normalization choices in the configuration-space areas are tuned to the quantities being predicted.

    Authors: The pinning arises because resonant hybridization occurs precisely when the phase-space orbit closes after an integer number of steps under the irrational rotation, enclosing an area fixed by the continued-fraction convergents of the rotation number. We will insert a new appendix that supplies the missing step-by-step algebra: (i) the resonance condition expressed as an equality between the on-site energy difference and the hopping amplitude, (ii) the explicit computation of the enclosed configuration-space area from the orbit, and (iii) a perturbative bound showing that non-resonant contributions are suppressed by the detuning energy, which grows with distance. The areas are determined solely by the geometry of the torus and the irrational rotation number; no adjustable normalization is introduced. These additions will make the derivation fully explicit and demonstrate that the predictions remain parameter-free. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in configuration-space derivation

full rationale

The paper constructs a configuration-space framework from resonant hybridization rules between neighboring sites to predict gap positions and the pinning of IDOS to specific irrational areas. These predictions are then compared for agreement against independent large-scale numerical simulations of the lowest-band tight-binding model. No quoted step shows a prediction that reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation; the hybridization mechanism supplies explanatory content separate from the numerical outputs. The absence of a direct benchmark against the full continuous Schrödinger operator is a potential limitation on model validity but does not create circularity within the reported derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the configuration-space picture captures the infinite-size limit and that the Wannier-based tight-binding model faithfully represents the lowest band without higher-band mixing.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasicrystalline potentials admit a configuration-space representation in which resonant hybridization between distant sites can be identified without finite-size truncation.
    Invoked to justify moving beyond finite-size numerics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5436 in / 1212 out tokens · 36398 ms · 2026-05-16T20:53:56.384878+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Programmable Dynamic Phase Control of a Quasiperiodic Optical Lattice

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An experimental scheme creates a programmable dynamic 2D quasiperiodic optical lattice with phase noise suppressed by over 70 dB below 60 Hz and 350 kHz modulation bandwidth, enabling translational and phasonic contro...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In addition, we establish the 8QC as an ideal candidate for hosting two-dimensional (2D) many-body localised (MBL) phases

    To verify our predictions, we use our recently developed techniques [36] to construct a large-scale numerical tight-binding Hamiltonian of the lowest band of the system and find excellent agreement between the numerics and our analytical predictions. In addition, we establish the 8QC as an ideal candidate for hosting two-dimensional (2D) many-body localis...

  2. [2]

    EveryΦuniquely identifies a single lattice site

  3. [3]

    In the infinite-size limit, the octagon is densely and uniformly populated with lattice sites, which is sim- ilar to the perpendicular spaces of octagonal dis- crete quasiperiodic lattices [54, 55]

  4. [4]

    Every edge of the octagon can be identified with the opposing edge, equipping configuration space with periodic boundary conditions and hence the topology of a two-hole torus

  5. [5]

    decouple

    Symmetry points or lines in configuration space correspond to symmetry points or lines of the qua- sicrystal. For instance, the center of configuration space corresponds to the global minimum and cen- ter of eight-fold symmetry of the 8QC potential. We can then re-express the tight-binding Hamiltonian of the 8QC in this uniformly dense octagonal configura...

  6. [6]

    Additionally, we observed that the system forms an almost flat band in which eigenstates are localized on eight-fold symmetric rings composed of 8 sites

    To demonstrate the validity of the ana- lytical construction, we predicted the integrated density of states expected below the lowest of the most signifi- cant gaps in the system and found excellent agreement with numerics obtained on a large-scale tight-binding Hamiltonian constructed using localized Wannier func- tions. Additionally, we observed that th...

  7. [7]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Metallic Phase with Long-Range Orientational Order and No Translational Symmetry, Physical Review Let- ters53, 1951 (1984)

  8. [8]

    P. A. Thiel and J.-M. Dubois, Quasicrystals. Reaching maturity for technological applications, Materials Today 2, 3 (1999)

  9. [9]

    Bindi, W

    L. Bindi, W. Kolb, G. N. Eby, P. D. Asimow, T. C. Wal- lace, and P. J. Steinhardt, Accidental synthesis of a pre- viously unknown quasicrystal in the first atomic bomb test, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2101350118 (2021)

  10. [10]

    Bindi, J

    L. Bindi, J. M. Eiler, Y. Guan, L. S. Hollister, G. MacPherson, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Yao, Evidence for the extraterrestrial origin of a natural quasicrystal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 1396 (2012)

  11. [11]

    Agros` ı, P

    G. Agros` ı, P. Manzari, D. Mele, G. Tempesta, F. Rizzo, T. Catelani, and L. Bindi, A naturally occurring Al- Cu-Fe-Si quasicrystal in a micrometeorite from southern Italy, Communications Earth & Environment5, 1 (2024)

  12. [12]

    Bindi, M

    L. Bindi, M. A. Pasek, C. Ma, J. Hu, G. Cheng, N. Yao, P. D. Asimow, and P. J. Steinhardt, Electrical dis- charge triggers quasicrystal formation in an eolian dune, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2215484119 (2023)

  13. [13]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topo- logical invariants of non-hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters121, 086803 (2018), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1720865115

  14. [14]

    S. J. Ahn, P. Moon, T.-H. Kim, H.-W. Kim, H.-C. Shin, E. H. Kim, H. W. Cha, S.-J. Kahng, P. Kim, M. Koshino, Y.-W. Son, C.-W. Yang, and J. R. Ahn, Dirac electrons in a dodecagonal graphene quasicrystal, Science361, 782 (2018)

  15. [15]

    A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, M. T. Randeria, D. Rodan- Legrain, T. Devakul, P. J. D. Crowley, N. Paul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Lifshitz, L. Fu, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moir´ e quasicrystal, Na- ture620, 762 (2023)

  16. [16]

    Steurer and D

    W. Steurer and D. Sutter-Widmer, Photonic and phononic quasicrystals, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics40, R229–R247 (2007)

  17. [17]

    Z. V. Vardeny, A. Nahata, and A. Agrawal, Optics of pho- tonic quasicrystals, Nature Photonics7, 177–187 (2013)

  18. [18]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological states and adiabatic pump- ing in quasicrystals, Physical Review Letters109, 106402 (2012)

  19. [19]

    Y. E. Kraus, Z. Ringel, and O. Zilberberg, Four- Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect in a Two-Dimensional Quasicrystal, Physical Review Letters111, 226401 (2013)

  20. [20]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019)

  21. [21]

    Verbin, O

    M. Verbin, O. Zilberberg, Y. Lahini, Y. E. Kraus, and Y. Silberberg, Topological pumping over a photonic Fibonacci quasicrystal, Physical Review B91, 064201 (2015)

  22. [22]

    Goblot, A

    V. Goblot, A. ˇStrkalj, N. Pernet, J. L. Lado, C. Dorow, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, S. Ravets, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and O. Zilberberg, Emer- gence of criticality through a cascade of delocalization transitions in quasiperiodic chains, Nature Physics16, 832–836 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Senechal,Quasicrystals and Geometry(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    M. Senechal,Quasicrystals and Geometry(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

  24. [24]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. Bovier, and J.-M. Ghez, Gap labelling theorems for one dimensional discrete schr¨ odinger oper- ators, Reviews in Mathematical Physics04, 1 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X92000029

  25. [25]

    Sbroscia, K

    M. Sbroscia, K. Viebahn, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, A. Gaunt, and U. Schneider, Observing Localization in a 2D Qua- sicrystalline Optical Lattice, Physical Review Letters 125, 200604 (2020)

  26. [26]

    Devakul and D

    T. Devakul and D. A. Huse, Anderson localization tran- sitions with and without random potentials, Phys. Rev. B96, 214201 (2017)

  27. [27]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Annals israel phys, Soc.3, 133 (1980)

  28. [28]

    Ostlund, R

    S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H. J. Schellnhuber, and E. D. Siggia, One-dimensional schr¨ odinger equation with an almost periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1873 (1983)

  29. [29]

    J. Q. You, J. R. Yan, T. Xie, X. Zeng, and J. X. Zhong, Generalized fibonacci lattices: dynamical maps, energy spectra and wavefunctions, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter3, 7255 (1991)

  30. [30]

    J. H. Han, D. J. Thouless, H. Hiramoto, and M. Kohmoto, Critical and bicritical properties of harper’s equation with next-nearest-neighbor coupling, Phys. Rev. B50, 11365 (1994)

  31. [31]

    Szab´ o and U

    A. Szab´ o and U. Schneider, Mixed spectra and par- tially extended states in a two-dimensional quasiperiodic model, Physical Review B101, 014205 (2020)

  32. [32]

    Mac´ e, A

    N. Mac´ e, A. Jagannathan, and M. Duneau, Quantum Simulation of a 2D Quasicrystal with Cold Atoms, Crys- tals6, 124 (2016)

  33. [33]

    Viebahn, M

    K. Viebahn, M. Sbroscia, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, and U. Schneider, Matter-Wave Diffraction from a Quasicrys- talline Optical Lattice, Physical Review Letters122, 110404 (2019). 14

  34. [34]

    M. N. Kosch, L. Asteria, H. P. Zahn, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Multifrequency optical lattice for dynamic lattice-geometry control, Physical Review Re- search4, 043083 (2022)

  35. [35]

    J.-C. Yu, S. Bhave, L. Reeve, B. Song, and U. Schneider, Observing the two-dimensional bose glass in an optical quasicrystal, Nature633, 338–343 (2024)

  36. [36]

    Johnstone, P

    D. Johnstone, P. ¨Ohberg, and C. W. Duncan, Mean-field phases of an ultracold gas in a quasicrystalline potential, Physical Review A100, 053609 (2019)

  37. [37]

    Johnstone, P

    D. Johnstone, P. ¨Ohberg, and C. W. Duncan, The mean- field bose glass in quasicrystalline systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical54, 395001 (2021)

  38. [38]

    Gautier, H

    R. Gautier, H. Yao, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Strongly Interacting Bosons in a Two-Dimensional Quasicrystal Lattice, Physical Review Letters126, 110401 (2021)

  39. [39]

    Ciardi, T

    M. Ciardi, T. Macr` ı, and F. Cinti, Finite-temperature phases of trapped bosons in a two-dimensional quasiperi- odic potential, Physical Review A105, L011301 (2022)

  40. [40]

    Z. Zhu, H. Yao, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Thermody- namic phase diagram of two-dimensional bosons in a qua- sicrystal potential, Physical Review Letters130, 220402 (2023)

  41. [41]

    Szab´ o and U

    A. Szab´ o and U. Schneider, Non-power-law universality in one-dimensional quasicrystals, Physical Review B98, 134201 (2018)

  42. [42]

    Gottlob and U

    E. Gottlob and U. Schneider, Hubbard models for qua- sicrystalline potentials, Physical Review B107, 144202 (2023)

  43. [43]

    De Roeck and F

    W. De Roeck and F. Huveneers, Stability and instabil- ity towards delocalization in many-body localization sys- tems, Physical Review B95, 155129 (2017)

  44. [44]

    Agrawal, R

    U. Agrawal, R. Vasseur, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Quasiperiodic many-body localization transition in di- mension$d>1$, Physical Review B106, 094206 (2022)

  45. [45]

    P. J. D. Crowley and A. Chandran, Mean-field theory of failed thermalizing avalanches, Phys. Rev. B106, 184208 (2022)

  46. [46]

    ˇStrkalj, E

    A. ˇStrkalj, E. V. H. Doggen, and C. Castelnovo, Coexis- tence of localization and transport in many-body two- dimensional Aubry-Andr´ e models, Physical Review B 106, 184209 (2022)

  47. [47]

    Johnstone, P

    D. Johnstone, P. ¨Ohberg, and C. W. Duncan, Bar- riers to macroscopic superfluidity and insulation in a 2d aubry–andr´ e model, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics55, 125302 (2022)

  48. [48]

    C. W. Duncan, Critical states and anomalous mobility edges in two-dimensional diagonal quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B109, 014210 (2024)

  49. [49]

    Jagannathan and M

    A. Jagannathan and M. Duneau, An eightfold optical quasicrystal with cold atoms, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 104, 66003 (2013)

  50. [50]

    Jagannathan and M

    A. Jagannathan and M. Duneau, Properties of the ammann-beenker tiling and its square approximants (2024), arXiv:2308.07701 [cond-mat.str-el]

  51. [51]

    Gottlob, D

    E. Gottlob, D. S. Borgnia, R.-J. Slager, and U. Schnei- der, Quasiperiodicity protects quantized transport in dis- ordered systems without gaps, PRX Quantum6, 020359 (2025)

  52. [52]

    Marra and M

    P. Marra and M. Nitta, Topologically quantized current in quasiperiodic Thouless pumps, Physical Review Re- search2, 042035 (2020)

  53. [53]

    Gottlob, Emmgottlob/QuasiHubbard (2024)

    E. Gottlob, Emmgottlob/QuasiHubbard (2024)

  54. [54]

    J. Zhu, Z. Chen, and B. Wu, Construction of Maximally Localized Wannier Functions, Frontiers of Physics12, 127102 (2017), arXiv:1609.05992

  55. [55]

    M. L. Wall, K. R. A. Hazzard, and A. M. Rey, Effec- tive many-body parameters for atoms in nonseparable Gaussian optical potentials, Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics92, 013610 (2015)

  56. [56]

    H.-T. Wei, E. Ibarra-Garc´ ıa-Padilla, M. L. Wall, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Hubbard parameters for pro- grammable tweezer arrays, Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics109, 013318 (2024)

  57. [57]

    Z. Zhu, S. Yu, D. Johnstone, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Localization and spectral structure in two-dimensional quasicrystal potentials, Phys. Rev. A109, 013314 (2024)

  58. [58]

    Gottlob, Large-scale tight-binding hamiltonians of the eightfold quasicrystalline potential (8qc),https://doi

    E. Gottlob, Large-scale tight-binding hamiltonians of the eightfold quasicrystalline potential (8qc),https://doi. org/10.17863/CAM.95664

  59. [59]

    B. I. Shklovskii, B. Shapiro, B. R. Sears, P. Lambrian- ides, and H. B. Shore, Statistics of spectra of disordered systems near the metal-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B47, 11487 (1993)

  60. [60]

    Mirzhalilov and M

    M. Mirzhalilov and M. ¨O. Oktel, Perpendicular space ac- counting of localized states in a quasicrystal, Physical Review B102, 064213 (2020)

  61. [61]

    M. ¨O. Oktel, Strictly localized states in the octagonal Ammann-Beenker quasicrystal, Physical Review B104, 014204 (2021)

  62. [62]

    R. B. Griffiths, Nonanalytic behavior above the critical point in a random ising ferromagnet, Physical Review Letters23, 17–19 (1969)

  63. [63]

    Agarwal, E

    K. Agarwal, E. Altman, E. Demler, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and M. Knap, Rare-region effects and dy- namics near the many-body localization transition, An- nalen der Physik529, 10.1002/andp.201600326 (2017)

  64. [64]

    Jagannathan, Closing of gaps, gap labeling, and pas- sage from molecular states to critical states in a two- dimensional quasicrystal, Phys

    A. Jagannathan, Closing of gaps, gap labeling, and pas- sage from molecular states to critical states in a two- dimensional quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B108, 115109 (2023)

  65. [65]

    Sinc Discrete Variable representation The slow, polynomial, convergence of finite-difference (FD) methods calls for the use of alternatives with im- proved convergence rate. This can be achieved with the use of discrete variable representation (DVR) methods, which have been commonly used in chemical and molecu- lar physics, but did not find their way to t...