Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 130 references

Entanglement Dynamics by (Non-)Unitary Local Operator Quenches in a 2D Holographic CFT

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a 2D holographic CFT, reversing the order of Euclidean and Lorentzian time evolutions flips late-time entanglement growth from logarithmic to saturated.

desk verdict A mostly solid paper: the late-time plateau-vs-log dichotomy is a clean mechanism, but the central claim rests on a cross-ratio branch choice that is plausible yet not fully pinned down for the semi-infinite case. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.18781 v2 pith:UWVEGQKU submitted 2025-12-21 hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Weibo Mao , Akihiro Miyata , Masahiro Nozaki , Farzad Omidi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elquant-ph PACS 11.25.Hf03.67.Mn
keywords entanglemententropylocaloperatorquenchholographicCFTRindlerHamiltonianconformalblocksRyu-TakayanagiformulaBTZblackbranenon-unitarytimeevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies entanglement growth in a 2D holographic CFT after acting on the vacuum with a primary operator and then evolving with a composite of the Rindler Euclidean Hamiltonian and the uniform Lorentzian Hamiltonian in two opposite orders. It claims that for a semi-infinite interval, the late-time entanglement entropy grows logarithmically when the Euclidean evolution is applied first and then the Lorentzian one (a unitary process), while it saturates to a constant when the order is reversed (a non-unitary process). The difference is traced to the time dependence of the norm (partition function) of the state. If correct, this shows that whether half-line entanglement keeps growing at late times is controlled simply by unitarity of the composite evolution, offering a general criterion for other quench protocols.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the semi-classical expansion of holographic conformal blocks in the limit where the cross ratios η_i and η̄_i are close to one, with the identity operator and its descendants dominating. The late-time behavior is controlled by the analytic continuation of the anti-holomorphic cross-ratio: at t = x_1 - x, η̄_i passes through infinity and the paper shifts its phase by e^{-2πi}, converting the η̄ → 1 limit into a factor 2κ_O/(ε f̄_i). The winding geodesics in the Bañados/AdS3 gravity dual, computed via the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, provide support for this branch choice. The partition functions Z^0_i of the two protocols carry the unitary versus non-unitary distinction, and

What would settle it

Compute the exact late-time entanglement entropy for a semi-infinite interval in a solvable CFT (e.g., free boson or free fermion) under the same Rindler/uniform composite evolution: the branch-prescription mechanism predicts that the non-unitary (i=1) protocol saturates while the unitary (i=2) protocol grows logarithmically; if both orderings produce the same late-time scaling, the dichotomy would be an artifact of the holographic large-c approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a late-time dichotomy for the entanglement growth of a semi-infinite interval after a local operator quench with a composite evolution built from Euclidean Rindler and Lorentzian uniform Hamiltonians. When the Lorentzian evolution is applied first and then the Euclidean one (i=1), the protocol is non-unitary, the partition function decays as t^{-2h_O}, and the entanglement growth saturates to (c/6) log(κ_O/(aε)). When the Euclidean evolution is applied first (i=2), the protocol is unitary, the partition function is time-independent, and entanglement grows as (c/6) log(κ_O t/(aε x)). The ratio of partition functions fixes the difference between the two protoco

Load-bearing premise

The late-time plateau-versus-log dichotomy rests on a specific analytic-continuation branch choice for the anti-holomorphic cross-ratio at the moment it passes through infinity (the e^{-2πi} phase shift), which is supported but not proved by the winding-geodesic calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a semi-infinite interval in a 2D holographic CFT, late-time entanglement after a local operator quench depends on the time-ordering of Euclidean and Lorentzian evolutions.
  • Unitary composite evolution produces logarithmic growth of half-line entanglement, while non-unitary evolution produces saturation to a constant determined by the operator's conformal dimension.
  • The difference is governed by the time dependence of the partition function (norm) of the state: a decaying norm cancels the would-be logarithmic growth.
  • For heavy primary operators, the gravity dual is a black brane with a spacetime-dependent horizon whose closest approach to the boundary occurs at the initial insertion point of the local operator.
  • The mutual information between two distant intervals also shows time-ordering effects, with time-dependent phase transitions between connected and disconnected Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If unitarity of the composite evolution is the controlling factor, similar saturation-versus-log behaviors would be expected in other non-unitary protocols, such as monitored or post-selected dynamics, wherever the partition function decays in time.
  • The identification of the Euclidean evolution with a post-selecting projective measurement (Sec. 3.4) suggests the non-unitary protocol could be interpreted as a monitored evolution, and the late-time saturation might be a signature of measurement-induced dynamics in a holographic CFT.
  • The branch-prescription dependence is a potential weak point; computing the full Virasoro conformal block without assuming identity-dominance for moderate h_O/c values could test whether the dichotomy survives.
  • The horizon shape in the gravity dual, with two minima propagating at the speed of light, may serve as a bulk observable that distinguishes unitary from non-unitary quench protocols.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes a family of local-operator quenches in 2D holographic CFTs where the initial operator insertion is followed by a composite evolution consisting of a Euclidean Rindler Hamiltonian and a uniform Lorentzian Hamiltonian in two possible orders (Eq. (2.1)). Using holographic conformal blocks in the large central charge limit, the authors derive analytic expressions for the entanglement entropy of finite and semi-infinite intervals (Eqs. (3.44), (3.54)) and for mutual information. The central result is the late-time dichotomy for a semi-infinite interval: the non-unitary ordering i=1 gives ΔS_{A;1} ≈ (c/6) log(κ_O/aε), while the unitary ordering i=2 gives ΔS_{A;2} ≈ (c/6) log(κ_O t/(aε x)) (Eq. (3.55)). The authors also compute energy-momentum expectation values, construct the Bañados dual geometry, identify a black brane with a spacetime-dependent horizon, and propose a quasiparticle/energy-density mechanism. A holographic geodesic computation with winding numbers reproduces the CFT results for the finite interval.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete, falsifiable prediction about time-ordering effects: whether half-line entanglement entropy saturates or grows logarithmically is tied to unitarity of the composite evolution. The analytic formulas are explicit and internally consistent, with branch choices stated; the geodesic computation in Sec. 3.8.2 provides a genuine cross-check for the finite interval. The paper also derives the gravity dual and identifies the horizon shape, adding a geometric perspective. The main weakness is that the pivotal late-time dichotomy rests on an unproved analytic-continuation branch choice and on identity-block dominance, which need to be justified directly.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.6.1, Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55)] The late-time separation between ΔS_{A;1} and ΔS_{A;2} is entirely controlled by the phase shift ¯η_i → e^{-2πi} ¯η_i applied when t passes x_1 − x. This prescription is stated, not derived. The claimed independent support from winding geodesics (Sec. 3.8.2) does not fully close the gap: the maps in Eqs. (3.80)/(3.84) and the winding transformations (3.99)–(3.101) already contain the same branch choice, and for the semi-infinite interval no explicit minimization over winding numbers is presented. Please provide a direct derivation of the branch (e.g., from the Lorentzian iε continuation or from the monodromy of the vacuum block), or an explicit half-line geodesic computation, to make Eq. (3.55) unconditional.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.12)] The derivation assumes identity-block dominance of the semiclassical Virasoro block for η, η̄ ≃ 1 on the selected sheet. The late-time κ_O factor, and hence the plateau-vs-log selection, depends on this assumption. The paper does not specify the precise parameter regime where the approximation is controlled, nor does it quantify corrections from other blocks. Since the central claim is made for generic heavy operators, this dominance should be checked (analytically or numerically) rather than assumed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.20)] Equation (4.20) inverts the square root relative to Eq. (4.19). From u'^min_{h;i} = L_AdS x a ε / (2 r_h) and r_h/L_AdS = sqrt(24 h_O/c − 1), the condition u'^min ≥ 1 reads 1 ≤ (x a ε / 2) / sqrt(24 h_O/c − 1), not 1 ≤ (x a ε / 2) sqrt(24 h_O/c − 1).
  2. [Sec. 3.10.2, Eq. (3.123)] The notation Z^0_{a;i} is ambiguous: the text and Eq. (3.45) indicate the relevant ratio is the right-moving (anti-holomorphic) partition function, but the subscript a is not defined. Please clarify which component is used and define Z^0_{a;i}.
  3. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (3.38)] The post-selection interpretation requires the existence of a bounded Hermitian operator H_s satisfying cos(μH_s) = e^{-εH_R}. This is an ad hoc assumption; the paper should present it as a heuristic analogy or provide an argument for existence.
  4. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typos and formatting artifacts (e.g., 'Bana˜ndos', inconsistent spacing, garbled subscripts in Appendix D). A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the plateau/log dichotomy is derived from standard conformal blocks and cross-ratios; the one overlapping-author citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The central predictions, Eq. (3.55) and its finite-interval extensions, are obtained by inserting the explicit cross-ratios (3.20)/(3.51) into the semiclassical identity-block formula (3.12), which is an external large-c result cited to Asplund-Bernamonti-Galli-Hartman and Fitzpatrick-Kaplan-Walters (no author overlap). No parameter is fitted to the entanglement data, and no quantity is defined in terms of the predicted entanglement growth. The same final formula (3.17) is independently reproduced by the geodesic-length computation in Sec. 3.8.2 (compare (3.98) with (3.17)), so the holographic check is not just a restatement of the CFT input. The e^{-2\pi i} branch prescription for \bar\eta_i in Sec. 3.6.1 is an analytic-continuation/monodromy choice; it is supported, though not rigorously proven, by the winding-geodesic branch interpretation (3.99)-(3.101), and any residual doubt is a correctness issue rather than a circular reduction. The only self-citation is Ref. [40] (Mao & Nozaki, overlapping with this paper's authors), used in the mechanism section 3.10.2 through Eq. (3.116); it is non-load-bearing because the quantum-information results are already established by two independent methods before that section. Therefore no circular step is identified; at most a minor overlapping-author citation appears in a supporting 'mechanism' discussion.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The derivation is honest: no fitted constants, no invented particles. The protocol parameters a and ε are free knobs whose values set the saturation scale. The axioms are standard large-c holographic CFT machinery plus one self-cited formula ([40]) used only in the explanatory section. The branch-choice axiom is the most fragile and is partially supported by the winding-geodesic computation.

free parameters (2)
  • a (Rindler coupling) = dimensionless, >0; figures use 10^-3 to 10^-5
    Chosen by hand in H_R = a∫xh(x)dx (2.5); enters all final formulas including the saturation value log(κ_O/aε); no principle fixes it.
  • ε (Euclidean regulator) = figures use 10–50 with aε small
    UV regulator in e^{−εHR}; the headline i=1 plateau (c/6)log(κ_O/aε) diverges as ε→0 and is regulator-dependent — this dependence is not discussed.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical exponentiation of Virasoro conformal blocks and the light-light-heavy-heavy approximation (Eq (3.12))
    Central tool for evaluating G_n(η,η̄); valid for c→∞ with h_O/c and h_n/c fixed; invoked in Sec 3.2 to obtain the EE in (3.17).
  • domain assumption Identity-block dominance of the conformal block for η_i ≃ 1
    Used to drop other conformal blocks in the (n−1)-expansion; the small-ε expansion (3.21) keeps η_i−1 ~ iε f_i small, but the branch at t = x1−x has η̄_i → ∞, handled by phase shift.
  • domain assumption AdS3/CFT2 dictionary: Ryu-Takayanagi formula, Banados metric, Brown-Henneaux c = 3L/2G_N
    Sec 3.8: holographic EE equals geodesic length; the dual geometry is built from ⟨T⟩ via (3.66)-(3.67).
  • standard math H_R annihilates the vacuum of H_0
    H_R = α(L_0 − L̄_0) (A.6) annihilates |0⟩; used in (2.2) to move operators past the vacuum and to justify the regulator.
  • domain assumption The regulator interpretation of e^{−εH_R} is restricted to the positive half-line x > 0
    Sec 2.1: xh(x) < 0 for x < 0, so e^{−εH_R} may not regulate there; the paper restricts to x > 0 and does not analyze the negative region.
  • standard math Analytic continuation τ_E = it after the replica twist computation, with branch choices (η̄_i → e^{−2πi}η̄_i) at light-cone times
    Sec 3.5.1/3.6.1; the correct branch is fixed by comparison with the holographic winding geodesics of Sec 3.8.2, which supports but does not prove the choice.
  • domain assumption EE–energy-density formula (3.116) of Ref. [40] applies to the present states
    Sec 3.10.2: the mechanism section relies on this formula, stated as 'reported in [40]' — a self-citation by overlapping authors; the EE formulas (3.44), (3.54) are derived independently before this point.
  • ad hoc to paper Post-selective measurement realization needs cos(μH_s) = e^{−εH_R} for some bounded H_s
    Sec 3.4, stated conditionally ('If we can find...'); not established for unbounded H_R; interpretive only.
invented entities (1)
  • Two-level ancilla system (|↑⟩,|↓⟩) with H_s·σ_x interaction
    purpose: Interpret the non-unitary Euclidean evolution e^{−εH_R} as a post-selected projective measurement (Sec 3.4)
    Illustrative model imported from Ref. [103]; requires cos(μH_s)=e^{−εH_R}, asserted conditionally; plays no role in the EE/MI derivations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement Dynamics by (Non-)Unitary Local Operator Quenches in a 2D Holographic CFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UWVEGQKU

@misc{pith2026251218781,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement Dynamics by (Non-)Unitary Local Operator Quenches in a 2D Holographic CFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UWVEGQKU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.18781}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the time evolution of entanglement entropy and mutual information for the spatially-infinite systems where we act with a primary operator on the vacuum state and then time-evolve it with the sequence of the Euclidean and Lorentzian time evolutions. Two-dimensional holographic conformal field theories describe the systems under consideration in this paper. The Euclidean time evolution is induced by the Rindler Hamiltonian and behaves as the regulator that tames the divergence induced by the local operator, while the Lorentzian one is induced by the uniform Hamiltonian. Under these time evolutions, we investigate the time ordering effect of the Rindler Euclidean and uniform Lorentzian time evolution operators. Consequently, we find the remarkable differences between those time evolutions are induced by whether those are unitary or non-unitary. Especially, we find that the unitary time evolution induces the late-time logarithmic growth of the entanglement entropy, while the non-unitary time evolution induces the late-time constant behavior. Furthermore, we investigate the dual gravity of the systems under consideration. Especially, we investigate the gravity duals of the systems with the insertion of the heavy primary operator and show that it is a black brane with a spacetime-dependent horizon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.18781 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ⟨Ttt⟩i sin2 (aϵ) as a function of X and t when the primary operator is inserted at x = 103 . Left) For i = 1. Right) For i = 2. At the insertion point of the primary operator, two energy excitations are created and they propagate along two null directions. We set hO = h¯O = 103 , a = 10−3 and ϵ = 50. 3.8 Entanglement Entropy as Geodesic Length In the previous sections 3.2, 3.5, and 3.6, we calculated the entanglemen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SA;1 as a function of time when the primary operator is inserted outside and on the left hand side of the subsystem. Left) The contributions of different geodesics with winding numbers (m, m). Right) Comparison of the entanglement entropy on the CFT and gravity sides. Here, we set x = 104 , x1 = 2 × 104 , x2 = 3 × 104 , a = 10−5 , c = 100, ϵ = 10 and hO = 0.4h0 where h0 = c 24 . where we defined E = e 2πim and E¯ = … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. SA;1 as a function of time when the primary operator is inserted inside of the subsystem. Left) The contributions of different geodesics with winding numbers (m, m). Right) Comparison of the entanglement entropy on the CFT and gravity sides. Here, we set x = 2 × 104 , x1 = 104 , x2 = 4 × 104 , a = 10−5 , c = 100, ϵ = 10 and hO = 5h0. at early times, the geodesic with (m = −1, m = 1) has the minimum length. On the ot… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The disconnected γ12∪γ34 and connected γ14∪γ23 Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces for the subsystem A ∪ B. Here, A ∈ [x1, x2] and B ∈ [x3, x4] and they are separated by the distance d. The primary operator O is inserted at x on the left hand side of the subsystem A. SA∪B = Min [S…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Different configurations for the calculation of the holographic mutual information: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: IA,B;i as a function of time for the symmetric configuration where the primary operator is inserted between the subsystems A and B and at equal distances from them. Here, d < dVac crit . Moreover, we set x1 = 104 , x2 = 2 × 104 , x = 2.2 × 104 , x3 = 2.4 × 104 , x4 = 3…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The horizon radius ˜uh;i as a function of X and t. Left) For i = 1 Right) For i = 2. We set x = 4.1 × 103 , LAdS = 105 , rh = 103 , a = 10−4 and ϵ = 10. the horizon. From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The horizon radius u ′ h;i and ⟨Ttt⟩i sin2 (aϵ) as a function of t. Left) For i = 1. Right) for i = 2. We set x = 4 × 103 , X = 2 × 103 , LAdS = 105 , rh = 7 × 104 , a = 10−4 , ϵ = 50 and c = 1000. Moreover, hO = c 24  1 + r 2 h L2 AdS  . It is observed that the mini…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: IA,B;i as a function of time for the asymmetric configuration where the primary operator is inserted between the subsystems A and B and closer to A. Left) For d < dVac crit , x3 = 2.4 × 104 and x4 = 3.4 × 104 . Right) For d Vac crit < d < di , x3 = 3 × 104 and x4 = 4 ×…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: IA,B;i as a function of time when the primary operator is inserted outside of the subsystems A and B and on their left hand sides. Left) For d < ˜di < dVac crit , x3 = 30010 and x4 = 40010. Right) For ˜di < d < dVac crit , x3 = 3.2 × 104 and x4 = 4.2 × 104 . Here, we …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: IA,B;i as a function of time when the primary operator is inserted inside the subsystem A. Left) For d < d′ i < dVac crit , x = 1.2 × 104 , x3 = 20010 and x4 = 30010. Right) For d ′ i < d < dVac crit , x3 = 2.4 × 104 and x4 = 3.4 × 104 . Here, we set x1 = 104 , x2 = 2…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [58]

    Quantum dimension as en- tanglement entropy in two dimensional conformal field theories,

    S. He, T. Numasawa, T. Takayanagi, and K. Watanabe, “Quantum dimension as en- tanglement entropy in two dimensional conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 90, no. 4, p. 041701, 2014

    2014

  2. [1]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998

    1998

  3. [2]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 428, pp. 105–114, 1998

    1998

  4. [3]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998

    1998

  5. [4]

    Quantum dynamics in sine-square deformed conformal field theory: Quench from uniform to nonuniform conformal field theory,

    X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, “Quantum dynamics in sine-square deformed conformal field theory: Quench from uniform to nonuniform conformal field theory,” Physical Review B, vol. 97, May 2018

    2018

  6. [5]

    Floquet conformal field theory,

    X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, “Floquet conformal field theory,” 4 2018

    2018

  7. [6]

    Non-equilibrating a black hole with inhomogeneous quantum quench,

    K. Goto, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, “Non-equilibrating a black hole with inhomogeneous quantum quench,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 186, 2025

    2025

  8. [7]

    Emergent Spatial Structure and Entan- glement Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, “Emergent Spatial Structure and Entan- glement Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 031036, 2020. 69

    2020

Show all 130 references
  1. [8]

    Emer- gent black hole dynamics in critical Floquet systems,

    B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, “Emer- gent black hole dynamics in critical Floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 023085, 2020

    2020

  2. [9]

    Classification ofSL 2 deformed Floquet conformal field theories,

    B. Han and X. Wen, “Classification ofSL 2 deformed Floquet conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, no. 20, p. 205125, 2020

    2020

  3. [10]

    Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,

    X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and Y. Gu, “Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 023044, 2021

    2021

  4. [11]

    Floquet conformal field theories with generally deformed Hamiltonians,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, “Floquet conformal field theories with generally deformed Hamiltonians,” SciPost Phys., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 049, 2021

    2021

  5. [12]

    Geometric approach to inhomogeneous Floquet systems,

    B. Lapierre and P. Moosavi, “Geometric approach to inhomogeneous Floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, p. 224303, 2021

    2021

  6. [13]

    Periodically, Quasi-periodically, and Ran- domly Driven Conformal Field Theories (II): Furstenberg’s Theorem and Exceptions to Heating Phases,

    X. Wen, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and R. Fan, “Periodically, Quasi-periodically, and Ran- domly Driven Conformal Field Theories (II): Furstenberg’s Theorem and Exceptions to Heating Phases,” SciPost Phys., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 082, 2022

    2022

  7. [14]

    Scrambling and recovery of quantum information in inhomogeneous quenches in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    K. Goto, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, “Scrambling and recovery of quantum information in inhomogeneous quenches in two-dimensional conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 023001, 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    New horizons for inhomogeneous quenches and Floquet CFT,

    H. Jiang and M. Mezei, “New horizons for inhomogeneous quenches and Floquet CFT,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 025, 2025

    2025

  9. [16]

    Geometry and Complexity of Path Integrals in Inho- mogeneous CFTs,

    P. Caputa and I. MacCormack, “Geometry and Complexity of Path Integrals in Inho- mogeneous CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 027, 2021. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 109 (2022)]

    2021

  10. [17]

    Hawking-Page and entan- glement phase transition in 2d CFT on curved backgrounds,

    A. Miyata, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. Watanabe, “Hawking-Page and entan- glement phase transition in 2d CFT on curved backgrounds,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 190, 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    The holography of the 2D inhomogeneously deformed CFT,

    Z. Li, Z. Li, and J. Tian, “The holography of the 2D inhomogeneously deformed CFT,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 161, 2025

    2025

  12. [19]

    Spherical deformation for one-dimensional quantum systems,

    A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, “Spherical deformation for one-dimensional quantum systems,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 122, p. 953–967, Oct. 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    Spherical Deformation for One-Dimensional Quantum Systems,

    A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, “Spherical Deformation for One-Dimensional Quantum Systems,” Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 953–967, 2009. [Erratum: Prog.Theor.Phys. 123, 393 (2010)]. 70

    2009

  14. [21]

    Connecting distant ends of one-dimensional critical sys- tems by a sine-square deformation,

    T. Hikihara and T. Nishino, “Connecting distant ends of one-dimensional critical sys- tems by a sine-square deformation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, no. 6, p. 060414, 2011

    2011

  15. [22]

    Suppression of finite-size effects in one-dimensional correlated systems,

    A. Gendiar, M. Daniˇ ska, Y. Lee, and T. Nishino, “Suppression of finite-size effects in one-dimensional correlated systems,” Physical Review A, vol. 83, May 2011

    2011

  16. [23]

    Sine-square deformation of solvable spin chains and conformal field the- ories,

    H. Katsura, “Sine-square deformation of solvable spin chains and conformal field the- ories,” J. Phys. A, vol. 45, p. 115003, 2012

    2012

  17. [24]

    Boundary effects in the density-matrix renormalization group calculation,

    N. Shibata and C. Hotta, “Boundary effects in the density-matrix renormalization group calculation,” Physical Review B, vol. 84, Sept. 2011

    2011

  18. [25]

    Exact ground state of the sine-square deformed XY spin chain,

    H. Katsura, “Exact ground state of the sine-square deformed XY spin chain,” J. Phys. A, vol. 44, no. 25, p. 252001, 2011

    2011

  19. [26]

    Sine-square deformation of free fermion systems in one and higher dimensions,

    I. Maruyama, H. Katsura, and T. Hikihara, “Sine-square deformation of free fermion systems in one and higher dimensions,” 8 2011

    2011

  20. [27]

    Grand canonical finite-size numerical approaches: A route to measuring bulk properties in an applied field,

    C. Hotta and N. Shibata, “Grand canonical finite-size numerical approaches: A route to measuring bulk properties in an applied field,” Physical Review B, vol. 86, July 2012

    2012

  21. [28]

    Grand canonical finite size numerical ap- proaches in one and two dimensions: Real space energy renormalization and edge state generation,

    C. Hotta, S. Nishimoto, and N. Shibata, “Grand canonical finite size numerical ap- proaches in one and two dimensions: Real space energy renormalization and edge state generation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, p. 115128, Mar 2013

    2013

  22. [29]

    Spatial deformation of many-body quantum chaotic systems and quantum information scrambling,

    K. Goto, T. Guo, T. Nosaka, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu, and K. Tamaoka, “Spatial deformation of many-body quantum chaotic systems and quantum information scrambling,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 109, no. 5, p. 054301, 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    Sine-Square Deformation and its Relevance to String Theory,

    T. Tada, “Sine-Square Deformation and its Relevance to String Theory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 30, no. 19, p. 1550092, 2015

    2015

  24. [31]

    Infinite circumference limit of conformal field theory,

    N. Ishibashi and T. Tada, “Infinite circumference limit of conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A, vol. 48, no. 31, p. 315402, 2015

    2015

  25. [32]

    Dipolar quantization and the infinite circumference limit of two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    N. Ishibashi and T. Tada, “Dipolar quantization and the infinite circumference limit of two-dimensional conformal field theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, vol. 31, no. 32, p. 1650170, 2016

    2016

  26. [33]

    Sine-square deformation and M¨ obius quantization of 2D conformal field theory,

    K. Okunishi, “Sine-square deformation and M¨ obius quantization of 2D conformal field theory,” PTEP, vol. 2016, no. 6, p. 063A02, 2016

    2016

  27. [34]

    Evolution operators in conformal field theories and conformal mappings: Entanglement Hamiltonian, the sine-square deformation, and others,

    X. Wen, S. Ryu, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “Evolution operators in conformal field theories and conformal mappings: Entanglement Hamiltonian, the sine-square deformation, and others,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93, no. 23, p. 235119, 2016. 71

    2016

  28. [35]

    Holographic Duals of Inhomogeneous Systems: The Rainbow Chain and the Sine-Square Deformation Model,

    I. MacCormack, A. Liu, M. Nozaki, and S. Ryu, “Holographic Duals of Inhomogeneous Systems: The Rainbow Chain and the Sine-Square Deformation Model,” J. Phys. A, vol. 52, no. 50, p. 505401, 2019

    2019

  29. [36]

    Inhomogeneous quenches as state preparation in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, “Inhomogeneous quenches as state preparation in two-dimensional conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 12, p. 126014, 2024

    2024

  30. [37]

    Inhomogeneous Quantum Quenches of Conformal Field Theory with Boundaries,

    X. Liu, A. McDonald, T. Numasawa, B. Lian, and S. Ryu, “Inhomogeneous Quantum Quenches of Conformal Field Theory with Boundaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 134, no. 22, p. 220404, 2025

    2025

  31. [38]

    Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomogeneous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians,

    W. Mao, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, “Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomogeneous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 200, 2024

    2024

  32. [39]

    Boundary-induced transitions in M¨ obius quenches of holographic BCFT,

    A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, and D. Ge, “Boundary-induced transitions in M¨ obius quenches of holographic BCFT,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 184, 2024

    2024

  33. [40]

    Time Ordering Effects and Destruction of Quasiparticles in Two-dimensional Holographic CFTs,

    W. Mao and M. Nozaki, “Time Ordering Effects and Destruction of Quasiparticles in Two-dimensional Holographic CFTs,” 8 2025

    2025

  34. [41]

    Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States,

    C. Bai, M. T. Tan, B. Lapierre, and S. Ryu, “Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States,” 10 2025

    2025

  35. [42]

    Bridging two quantum quench problems — local joining quantum quench and M¨ obius quench — and their holographic dual descriptions,

    J. Kudler-Flam, M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, S. Ryu, and M. T. Tan, “Bridging two quantum quench problems — local joining quantum quench and M¨ obius quench — and their holographic dual descriptions,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 213, 2024

    2024

  36. [43]

    Entanglement dynamics in 2d HCFTs on the curved background: the case of q-M¨ obius Hamiltonian,

    C. Bai, A. Miyata, and M. Nozaki, “Entanglement dynamics in 2d HCFTs on the curved background: the case of q-M¨ obius Hamiltonian,”JHEP, vol. 12, p. 208, 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    Diffusive Heat Waves in Random Conformal Field Theory,

    E. Langmann and P. Moosavi, “Diffusive Heat Waves in Random Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, no. 2, p. 020201, 2019

    2019

  38. [45]

    Inhomogeneous Conformal Field Theory Out of Equilibrium,

    P. Moosavi, “Inhomogeneous Conformal Field Theory Out of Equilibrium,” Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1083–1122, 2024

    2024

  39. [46]

    Floquet Dynamics of Boundary-Driven Systems at Criticality,

    W. Berdanier, M. Kolodrubetz, R. Vasseur, and J. E. Moore, “Floquet Dynamics of Boundary-Driven Systems at Criticality,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, no. 26, p. 260602, 2017

    2017

  40. [47]

    Floquet’s Refrigerator: Conformal Cooling in Driven Quantum Critical Systems,

    X. Wen, R. Fan, and A. Vishwanath, “Floquet’s Refrigerator: Conformal Cooling in Driven Quantum Critical Systems,” 10 2022. 72

    2022

  41. [48]

    Quantum information geometry of driven CFTs,

    J. de Boer, V. Godet, J. Kastikainen, and E. Keski-Vakkuri, “Quantum information geometry of driven CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 087, 2023

    2023

  42. [49]

    Exactly solvable floquet dynamics for conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two,

    D. Das, S. R. Das, A. Kundu, and K. Sengupta, “Exactly solvable floquet dynamics for conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 095, 2024

    2024

  43. [50]

    Floquet engineered inhomoge- neous quantum chaos in critical systems,

    B. Lapierre, T. Numasawa, T. Neupert, and S. Ryu, “Floquet engineered inhomoge- neous quantum chaos in critical systems,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, no. 10, p. 104317, 2025

    2025

  44. [51]

    Flowery horizons & bulk observers: sl (q)(2,R), drive in 2d holographic CFT,

    J. Das and A. Kundu, “Flowery horizons & bulk observers: sl (q)(2,R), drive in 2d holographic CFT,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 035, 2025

    2025

  45. [52]

    Phase transitions in quasiperiodically driven quantum critical systems: Analytical results,

    J. Fang, Q. Zhou, and X. Wen, “Phase transitions in quasiperiodically driven quantum critical systems: Analytical results,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 111, no. 9, p. 094304, 2025

    2025

  46. [53]

    Dynamical Phases of Higher Dimen- sional Floquet CFTs,

    D. Das, S. R. Das, A. Kundu, and K. Sengupta, “Dynamical Phases of Higher Dimen- sional Floquet CFTs,” 3 2025

    2025

  47. [54]

    Driven Non-Unitary Dynamics of Quantum Critical Systems,

    B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, “Driven Non-Unitary Dynamics of Quantum Critical Systems,” 5 2025

    2025

  48. [55]

    Fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system,

    B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, “Fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system,” Physical Review Research, vol. 2, Sept. 2020

    2020

  49. [56]

    Holographic Local Quenches and En- tanglement Density,

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Local Quenches and En- tanglement Density,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 080, 2013

    2013

  50. [57]

    Quantum Entanglement of Local Op- erators in Conformal Field Theories,

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, and T. Takayanagi, “Quantum Entanglement of Local Op- erators in Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, p. 111602, 2014

    2014

  51. [59]

    Notes on Quantum Entanglement of Local Operators,

    M. Nozaki, “Notes on Quantum Entanglement of Local Operators,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 147, 2014

    2014

  52. [60]

    Entanglement of local operators in large-N conformal field theories,

    P. Caputa, M. Nozaki, and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement of local operators in large-N conformal field theories,” PTEP, vol. 2014, p. 093B06, 2014

    2014

  53. [61]

    Quantum Entanglement of Localized Excited States at Finite Temperature,

    P. Caputa, J. Sim´ on, A. ˇStikonas, and T. Takayanagi, “Quantum Entanglement of Localized Excited States at Finite Temperature,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 102, 2015. 73

    2015

  54. [62]

    Holographic entangle- ment entropy from 2d CFT: heavy states and local quenches,

    C. T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, and T. Hartman, “Holographic entangle- ment entropy from 2d CFT: heavy states and local quenches,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, p. 171, Feb. 2015

    2015

  55. [63]

    R´ enyi entropy of locally excited states with thermal and bound- ary effect in 2D CFTs,

    W.-Z. Guo and S. He, “R´ enyi entropy of locally excited states with thermal and bound- ary effect in 2D CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 099, 2015

    2015

  56. [64]

    Entanglement Entropy for Descendent Local Operators in 2D CFTs,

    B. Chen, W.-Z. Guo, S. He, and J.-q. Wu, “Entanglement Entropy for Descendent Local Operators in 2D CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 173, 2015

    2015

  57. [65]

    Quantum Entanglement of Fermionic Local Operators,

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, and S. Matsuura, “Quantum Entanglement of Fermionic Local Operators,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 150, 2016

    2016

  58. [66]

    Charged Entanglement Entropy of Local Operators,

    P. Caputa, M. Nozaki, and T. Numasawa, “Charged Entanglement Entropy of Local Operators,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 10, p. 105032, 2016

    2016

  59. [67]

    Quantum Entanglement of Locally Excited States in Maxwell Theory,

    M. Nozaki and N. Watamura, “Quantum Entanglement of Locally Excited States in Maxwell Theory,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 069, 2016

    2016

  60. [68]

    Universal corrections to entanglement entropy of local quantum quenches,

    J. R. David, S. Khetrapal, and S. P. Kumar, “Universal corrections to entanglement entropy of local quantum quenches,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 127, 2016

    2016

  61. [69]

    Conformal bootstrap to R´ enyi entropy in 2D Liouville and super-Liouville CFTs,

    S. He, “Conformal bootstrap to R´ enyi entropy in 2D Liouville and super-Liouville CFTs,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 99, no. 2, p. 026005, 2019

    2019

  62. [70]

    Holographic Quantum Circuits from Split- ting/Joining Local Quenches,

    T. Shimaji, T. Takayanagi, and Z. Wei, “Holographic Quantum Circuits from Split- ting/Joining Local Quenches,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 165, 2019

    2019

  63. [71]

    Entanglement entropy in (1+1)D CFTs with mul- tiple local excitations,

    W.-Z. Guo, S. He, and Z.-X. Luo, “Entanglement entropy in (1+1)D CFTs with mul- tiple local excitations,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 154, 2018

    2018

  64. [72]

    Entanglement and chaos in warped conformal field theories,

    L. Apolo, S. He, W. Song, J. Xu, and J. Zheng, “Entanglement and chaos in warped conformal field theories,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 009, 2019

    2019

  65. [73]

    Entanglement Entropy, OTOC and Bootstrap in 2D CFTs from Regge and Light Cone Limits of Multi-point Conformal Block,

    Y. Kusuki and M. Miyaji, “Entanglement Entropy, OTOC and Bootstrap in 2D CFTs from Regge and Light Cone Limits of Multi-point Conformal Block,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 063, 2019

    2019

  66. [74]

    Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in theT T /JT- deformed CFTs,

    S. He and H. Shu, “Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in theT T /JT- deformed CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 088, 2020

    2020

  67. [75]

    Holographic local operator quenches in BCFTs,

    T. Kawamoto, T. Mori, Y.-k. Suzuki, T. Takayanagi, and T. Ugajin, “Holographic local operator quenches in BCFTs,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 060, 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Universal Local Operator Quenches and Entanglement Entropy,

    A. Bhattacharyya, T. Takayanagi, and K. Umemoto, “Universal Local Operator Quenches and Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 107, 2019. 74

    2019

  69. [77]

    Entanglement suppression due to black hole scattering,

    K. Doi and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement suppression due to black hole scattering,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 039, 2025

    2025

  70. [78]

    New holographic gen- eralization of entanglement entropy,

    Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, “New holographic gen- eralization of entanglement entropy,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 026005, 2021

    2021

  71. [79]

    Constructible reality condition of pseudo entropy via pseudo-Hermiticity,

    W.-z. Guo, S. He, and Y.-X. Zhang, “Constructible reality condition of pseudo entropy via pseudo-Hermiticity,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 021, 2023

    2023

  72. [80]

    On the real-time evolution of pseudo-entropy in 2d CFTs,

    W.-z. Guo, S. He, and Y.-X. Zhang, “On the real-time evolution of pseudo-entropy in 2d CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 094, 2022

    2022

  73. [81]

    Pseudo Entropy in U(1) gauge theory,

    J. Mukherjee, “Pseudo Entropy in U(1) gauge theory,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 016, 2022

    2022

  74. [82]

    Notes on pseudo entropy am- plification,

    Y. Ishiyama, R. Kojima, S. Matsui, and K. Tamaoka, “Notes on pseudo entropy am- plification,” PTEP, vol. 2022, no. 9, p. 093B10, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Pseudoentropy for descendant operators in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    S. He, J. Yang, Y.-X. Zhang, and Z.-X. Zhao, “Pseudoentropy for descendant operators in two-dimensional conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 025014, 2024

    2024

  76. [84]

    Sum rule for the pseudo-R´ enyi entropy,

    W.-z. Guo and J. Zhang, “Sum rule for the pseudo-R´ enyi entropy,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 10, p. 106008, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Pseudo entropy of primary operators inT T /JT-deformed CFTs,

    S. He, J. Yang, Y.-X. Zhang, and Z.-X. Zhao, “Pseudo entropy of primary operators inT T /JT-deformed CFTs,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 025, 2023

    2023

  78. [86]

    Pseudo R´ enyi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,

    F. Omidi, “Pseudo R´ enyi Entanglement Entropies For an Excited State and Its Time Evolution in a 2D CFT,” 9 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Timelike entanglement entropy,

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, “Timelike entanglement entropy,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 052, 2023

    2023

  80. [88]

    The quasi-particle picture and its breakdown after local quenches: mutual information, negativity, and reflected entropy,

    J. Kudler-Flam, Y. Kusuki, and S. Ryu, “The quasi-particle picture and its breakdown after local quenches: mutual information, negativity, and reflected entropy,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 146, 2021

    2021

  81. [89]

    Quantum Entanglement of Local Op- erators in Conformal Field Theories,

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, and T. Takayanagi, “Quantum Entanglement of Local Op- erators in Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. lett., vol. 112, p. 111602, Mar. 2014

    2014

  82. [90]

    Entanglement of Local Operators in large N CFTs,

    P. Caputa, M. Nozaki, and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement of Local Operators in large N CFTs,” ArXiv e-prints, May 2014

    2014

  83. [91]

    Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomogeneous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians,

    W. Mao, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, “Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomogeneous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2024, p. 200, July 2024. 75

    2024

  84. [92]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from the anti de Sitter Space/Conformal Field Theory Correspondence,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from the anti de Sitter Space/Conformal Field Theory Correspondence,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, p. 181602, May 2006

    2006

  85. [93]

    Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, p. 045, Aug. 2006

    2006

  86. [94]

    Generalized gravitational entropy,

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, p. 90, Aug. 2013

    2013

  87. [95]

    Geometric and renormalized entropy in con- formal field theory,

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, “Geometric and renormalized entropy in con- formal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 424, pp. 443–467, 1994

    1994

  88. [96]

    Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A, vol. 42, p. 504005, 2009

    2009

  89. [97]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview,

    T. Nishioka, S. Ryu, and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview,” J. Phys. A, vol. 42, p. 504008, 2009

    2009

  90. [98]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931. Springer, 2017

    2017

  91. [99]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 6, p. 06002, June 2004

    2004

  92. [100]

    Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,

    T. Hartman, “Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,” ArXiv e-prints, Mar. 2013

    2013

  93. [101]

    Universality of long-distance AdS physics from the CFT bootstrap,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and M. T. Walters, “Universality of long-distance AdS physics from the CFT bootstrap,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, p. 145, Aug. 2014

    2014

  94. [102]

    Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion rep- resentation of conformal block,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion rep- resentation of conformal block,” Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1088–1093, 1987

    1987

  95. [103]

    Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems,

    B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, “Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, p. 104322, Sept. 2025

    2025

  96. [104]

    APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY,

    P. H. Ginsparg, “APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY,” in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena, 9 1988

    1988

  97. [105]

    Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,

    M. Banados, “Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,”AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 484, no. 1, pp. 147–169, 1999. 76

    1999

  98. [106]

    Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,

    M. M. Roberts, “Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, Dec 2012

    2012

  99. [107]

    Two dimensional quantum quenches and holography,

    T. Ugajin, “Two dimensional quantum quenches and holography,” ArXiv e-prints, Nov. 2013

    2013

  100. [108]

    Finite size effect on dynamical entanglement entropy: CFT and holography,

    G. Mandal, R. Sinha, and T. Ugajin, “Finite size effect on dynamical entanglement entropy: CFT and holography,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1604.07830, Apr. 2016

    2016 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Correlation functions of huge operators in AdS 3/CFT2: domes, doors and book pages,

    J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers, and P. Vieira, “Correlation functions of huge operators in AdS 3/CFT2: domes, doors and book pages,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 118, 2024

    2024

  102. [110]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 104, pp. 207–226, 1986

    1986

  103. [111]

    Entanglement R´ enyi entropies in holographic theories,

    M. Headrick, “Entanglement R´ enyi entropies in holographic theories,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 82, p. 126010, Dec. 2010

    2010

  104. [112]

    Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems,

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 4, p. 04010, Apr. 2005

    2005

  105. [113]

    Entanglement and correlation functions following a local quench: a conformal field theory approach,

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement and correlation functions following a local quench: a conformal field theory approach,” J. Stat. Mech., vol. 0710, no. 10, p. P10004, 2007

    2007

  106. [114]

    Quantum Computation as Gravity,

    P. Caputa and J. M. Magan, “Quantum Computation as Gravity,” Phys. Rev. lett., vol. 122, p. 231302, June 2019

    2019

  107. [115]

    Floquet conformal field theories with generally deformed Hamiltonians,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, “Floquet conformal field theories with generally deformed Hamiltonians,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2011.09491, Nov. 2020

    2011 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Holography and correlation func- tions of huge operators: spacetime bananas,

    J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers, and P. Vieira, “Holography and correlation func- tions of huge operators: spacetime bananas,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 058, 2023

    2023

  109. [117]

    Spacetime bananas with EOW branes and spins,

    J. Tian, T. Lai, and F. Omidi, “Spacetime bananas with EOW branes and spins,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 203, 2025

    2025

  110. [118]

    Aspects of black hole quantum mechanics and thermo- dynamics in (2+1)-dimensions,

    S. Carlip and C. Teitelboim, “Aspects of black hole quantum mechanics and thermo- dynamics in (2+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 51, pp. 622–631, 1995

    1995

  111. [119]

    Mutual information after a local quench in con- formal field theory,

    C. T. Asplund and A. Bernamonti, “Mutual information after a local quench in con- formal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 89, no. 6, p. 066015, 2014

    2014

  112. [120]

    Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition,

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 98, p. 205136, Nov. 2018. 77

    2018

  113. [121]

    Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits,

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 134306, Oct. 2019

    2019

  114. [122]

    Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement,

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, “Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement,” Physical Review X, vol. 9, p. 031009, July 2019

    2019

  115. [123]

    Unitary-projective entangle- ment dynamics,

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, “Unitary-projective entangle- ment dynamics,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, p. 224307, June 2019

    2019

  116. [124]

    Entanglement transition from variable-strength weak measurements,

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, “Entanglement transition from variable-strength weak measurements,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 064204, Aug. 2019

    2019

  117. [125]

    Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements,

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, “Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements,” Physical Review X, vol. 10, p. 041020, Oct. 2020

    2020

  118. [126]

    Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits,

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 101, p. 104302, Mar. 2020

    2020

  119. [127]

    Conformal invariance and quantum non-locality in critical hybrid circuits,

    Y. Li, X. Chen, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Conformal invariance and quantum non-locality in critical hybrid circuits,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2003.12721, Mar. 2020

    2003 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Postselection-Free Entanglement Dynamics via Space- time Duality,

    M. Ippoliti and V. Khemani, “Postselection-Free Entanglement Dynamics via Space- time Duality,” Phys. Rev. lett., vol. 126, p. 060501, Feb. 2021

    2021

  121. [129]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997

    1997

  122. [130]

    An Introduction to conformal field theory,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, “An Introduction to conformal field theory,” Rept. Prog. Phys., vol. 63, pp. 607–667, 2000. 78

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.