REVIEW 2 cited by
FuzzAug: Data Augmentation by Coverage-guided Fuzzing for Neural Test Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Testing is essential to modern software engineering for building reliable software. Given the high costs of manually creating test cases, automated test case generation, particularly methods utilizing large language models, has become increasingly popular. These neural approaches generate semantically meaningful tests that are more maintainable compared with traditional automatic testing methods like fuzzing. However, the diversity and volume of unit tests in current datasets are limited, especially for newer but important languages. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique, FuzzAug, that introduces the benefits of fuzzing to large language models by introducing valid testing semantics and providing diverse coverage-guided inputs. Doubling the size of training datasets, FuzzAug improves the performance from the baselines significantly. This technique demonstrates the potential of introducing prior knowledge from dynamic software analysis to improve neural test generation, offering significant enhancements in neural test generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large Language Models for Unit Testing: A Systematic Literature Review
The paper presents the first systematic literature review of large language model based unit testing, covering 105 papers up to March 2025.
-
Assessing Data Augmentation-Induced Bias in Training and Testing of Machine Learning Models
A flaky-test classifier scores 8% higher on augmented copies of its training data than on independent test cases, but the comparison conflates augmentation with train-test overlap.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.