Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FuzzAug: Data Augmentation by Coverage-guided Fuzzing for Neural Test Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08665 v3 pith:25EB2WPC submitted 2024-06-12 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords testgenerationneuralfuzzaugfuzzingsoftwaretestingaugmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Testing is essential to modern software engineering for building reliable software. Given the high costs of manually creating test cases, automated test case generation, particularly methods utilizing large language models, has become increasingly popular. These neural approaches generate semantically meaningful tests that are more maintainable compared with traditional automatic testing methods like fuzzing. However, the diversity and volume of unit tests in current datasets are limited, especially for newer but important languages. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique, FuzzAug, that introduces the benefits of fuzzing to large language models by introducing valid testing semantics and providing diverse coverage-guided inputs. Doubling the size of training datasets, FuzzAug improves the performance from the baselines significantly. This technique demonstrates the potential of introducing prior knowledge from dynamic software analysis to improve neural test generation, offering significant enhancements in neural test generation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models for Unit Testing: A Systematic Literature Review

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper presents the first systematic literature review of large language model based unit testing, covering 105 papers up to March 2025.

  2. Assessing Data Augmentation-Induced Bias in Training and Testing of Machine Learning Models

    cs.SE 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A flaky-test classifier scores 8% higher on augmented copies of its training data than on independent test cases, but the comparison conflates augmentation with train-test overlap.

Pith tools