REVIEW 1 cited by
IceCube and the origin of ANITA-IV events
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
IceCube and the origin of ANITA-IV events
read the original abstract
Recently, the ANITA collaboration announced the detection of new, unsettling upgoing Ultra-High-Energy (UHE) events. Understanding their origin is pressing to ensure success of the incoming UHE neutrino program. In this work, we study their internal consistency and the implications of the lack of similar events in IceCube. We introduce a generic, simple parametrization to study the compatibility between these two observatories in Standard Model-like and Beyond Standard Model scenarios: an incoming flux of particles that interact with Earth nucleons with cross section $\sigma$, producing particle showers along with long-lived particles that decay with lifetime $\tau$ and generate a shower that explains ANITA observations. We find that the ANITA angular distribution imposes significant constraints, and when including null observations from IceCube only $\tau \sim 10^{-3}$ - $10^{-2} \,\mathrm{s}$ and $\sigma \sim 10^{-33}$ - $10^{-32}\,\mathrm{cm^2}$ can explain the data. This hypothesis is testable with future IceCube data. Finally, we discuss a specific model that can realize this scenario. Our analysis highlights the importance of simultaneous observations by high-energy optical neutrino telescopes and new UHE radio detectors to uncover cosmogenic neutrinos or discover new physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Four, One, and None: Quantifying the Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Anomaly Across ANITA-IV, KM3NeT, and IceCube
A joint three-detector analysis finds that ANITA-IV's four events and KM3NeT's 220 PeV event cannot be reconciled with IceCube's silence under any Standard Model diffuse or transient flux, leaving a 5.9-7.9σ anomaly.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.