pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.00518 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · physics.plasm-ph

High-energy Emission from Turbulent Electron-ion Coronae of Accreting Black Holes

Daniel Groselj , Alexander Philippov , Andrei M. Beloborodov , Richard Mushotzky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph
keywords black hole coronaturbulent plasmaX-ray spectranonthermal ionstwo-temperature plasmaCompton scatteringparticle-in-cell simulationNGC 4151
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Turbulent coronae around accreting black holes generate nonthermal ion distributions and produce X-ray spectra matching observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors model particle energization and radiation in strongly turbulent gas near black holes using 2D simulations of electron-ion plasma that include self-consistent Compton scattering along with injection and escape of particles and photons. These simulations show the corona self-regulating into a two-temperature state where ions become much hotter than electrons. The setup produces extended nonthermal ion distributions and X-ray spectra that agree closely with real data, including an excellent match to observations of NGC 4151. The emission also includes a predicted MeV tail generated by electrons accelerated at turbulent current sheets.

Core claim

A radiatively compact turbulent corona generates extended nonthermal ion distributions, while producing X-ray spectra consistent with observations. As an example, we demonstrate excellent agreement with observed X-ray spectra of NGC 4151. The predicted emission spectra feature an MeV tail, which can be studied with future MeV-band instruments. The MeV tail is shaped by nonthermal electrons accelerated at turbulent current sheets. We also find that the corona regulates itself into a two-temperature state, with ions much hotter than electrons. The ions carry away roughly two-thirds of the dissipated power, and their energization is driven by a combination of shocks and reconnecting current 3D.

What carries the argument

2D radiative particle-in-cell simulations of electron-ion plasma with self-consistent Compton scattering, photon and particle injection, and diffusive escape.

If this is right

  • The corona self-regulates into a two-temperature state with ions much hotter than electrons.
  • Ions carry away roughly two-thirds of the dissipated power through shocks and reconnecting current sheets.
  • Extended nonthermal ion distributions form within the turbulent flow.
  • X-ray spectra match observations such as those of NGC 4151.
  • An MeV tail appears in the emission, shaped by nonthermal electrons accelerated at turbulent current sheets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future MeV instruments could directly test the predicted spectral tail.
  • The turbulent acceleration mechanism may apply to other accreting systems beyond NGC 4151.
  • Global accretion disk models may need adjustment to incorporate local corona turbulence effects.
  • Similar two-temperature regulation could influence energy partitioning in other high-energy plasmas.

Load-bearing premise

The local 2D approximation and specific choices for photon and particle injection and diffusive escape accurately represent the global three-dimensional corona.

What would settle it

A measured MeV-band spectrum from NGC 4151 or a similar source that lacks the predicted tail from nonthermal electrons at current sheets would falsify the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00518 by Alexander Philippov, Andrei M. Beloborodov, Daniel Groselj, Richard Mushotzky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution and approach to steady state in our radiative PIC simulations of turbulence with ion magneti￾zations σi = 0.035, 0.1, 0.19. Shown from top to bottom are the box-averaged compactness ℓ, proper electron kinetic tem￾perature Te, proper ion kinetic temperature Ti, the turbulent sonic Mach number Ms, and the Alfvénic Mach number MA. bination of relatively smooth large-scale structures and shock d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization of turbulent fields in our simulation with σi = 0.19 at time t = 6.86 S/vA. The left panels show the proper ion and electron kinetic temperatures (Ti and Te). In the middle panels we show the magnetic field magnitude B and the out-of-plane electric current Jz. Finally, the right panels depict the ion density n and the density of fast-mode fluctuations nfast. For easier comparison with the tot… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Turbulent energy spectrum in our simulation with σi = 0.19, averaged over the steady state from t = 4 S/vA until the end of the run at t = 10.3 S/vA. In the bottom panel we show the 1D energy spectrum E(k⊥) as a function of the perpendicular wavenumber k⊥. Power-law slopes are shown for reference. In the top panel we show the relative energy content of fluctuations identified as the MHD Alfvén, slow, and f… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Steady-state particle spectra in our simulations with different strengths of the ion magnetization σi. The middle panel shows the ion energy spectra and the bottom panel the electron spectra. Energy is measured in units of the particles’ own rest mass (mic 2 for ions and mec 2 for electrons). Power-law slopes are indicated with black dotted lines for reference. In the bottom panel we fit a Maxwellian distr… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of predicted emission spectra with X-ray observations of NGC 4151. Dashed curves show the intrinsic steady-state spectra obtained directly from our PIC simulations. Solid color curves show the PIC spectra corrected for absorption and reflection. For E ≲ 100 keV, the PIC spectra obtained for different values of the compactness ℓ lie on top of each other and are thus nearly indistinguishable. Shad… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Structure of a shock inside the turbulent box of the run with σi = 0.19. Top panels show the fast-mode density and the y-component of the ion bulk velocity in a fraction of the domain. 1D shock profiles (middle and bottom panel) are extracted along the path indicated with arrows. In the middle panel we show the total density n, the fast-mode density nfast, the magnetic field magnitude B, and the bulk veloc… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Injection of particles into nonthermal populations near shocks and current sheets. On the top left we show the out-of-plane electric current Jz and the divergence of the bulk velocity ∇ · βbulk in a fraction of the 2D simulation domain. On the bottom left we show the density of nonthermal electrons ne,nt and nonthermal ions ni,nt. The red and green squares mark the representative locations of a current she… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Electron energy distributions extracted from locations with different values of the local temperature. Each color curve represents the distribution of particles from spatial cells where log10(Te) falls into a given range (as indicated by the colorbar). The distributions are normalized relative to the number of particles contained in a given band, such that their sum gives the total (box-averaged) distribut… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Total turbulent energy spectrum from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a model of particle energization and emission from strongly turbulent black-hole coronae. Our local model is based on a set of 2D radiative particle-in-cell simulations with an electron-ion plasma composition, injection and diffusive escape of photons and charged particles, and self-consistent Compton scattering. We show that a radiatively compact turbulent corona generates extended nonthermal ion distributions, while producing X-ray spectra consistent with observations. As an example, we demonstrate excellent agreement with observed X-ray spectra of NGC 4151. The predicted emission spectra feature an MeV tail, which can be studied with future MeV-band instruments. The MeV tail is shaped by nonthermal electrons accelerated at turbulent current sheets. We also find that the corona regulates itself into a two-temperature state, with ions much hotter than electrons. The ions carry away roughly two-thirds of the dissipated power, and their energization is driven by a combination of shocks and reconnecting current sheets, embedded into the turbulent flow.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a model of particle energization and emission from strongly turbulent black-hole coronae based on 2D radiative particle-in-cell simulations of electron-ion plasma with self-consistent Compton scattering, photon/particle injection, and diffusive escape. It claims that a radiatively compact turbulent corona generates extended nonthermal ion distributions and produces X-ray spectra consistent with observations, with an example of excellent agreement to NGC 4151 spectra featuring an MeV tail from nonthermal electrons at turbulent current sheets; the corona self-regulates into a two-temperature state with ions much hotter than electrons, carrying roughly two-thirds of the dissipated power through shocks and reconnecting current sheets.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides a significant first-principles framework for high-energy emission from accreting black holes, explaining the two-temperature corona state and predicting an observable MeV tail for future instruments. The self-consistent treatment without ad-hoc fitting parameters and the post-simulation validation against data are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (Simulation Setup): The central claims of spectral consistency with NGC 4151 and the two-temperature partition rest on the local 2D radiative PIC setup with prescribed injection and diffusive escape; 3D global effects on current-sheet statistics, reconnection rates, and photon transport could suppress the MeV tail or alter ion/electron energization, requiring at least a quantitative discussion or scaling test to support generalization beyond the local model.
  2. [§4] §4 (Spectral Results): The reported excellent agreement with NGC 4151 X-ray spectra is presented without error bars, resolution studies, or full parameter exploration, which undermines assessment of robustness given the local 2D approximation and limits in the reader's soundness evaluation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Briefly note the 2D local model limitations to appropriately frame expectations for the claimed observational agreement.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Include explicit labels for simulation resolution, box size, and key parameters to improve clarity of the presented spectra and distributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments and constructive feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, with revisions incorporated where feasible to strengthen the presentation of our local 2D model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (Simulation Setup): The central claims of spectral consistency with NGC 4151 and the two-temperature partition rest on the local 2D radiative PIC setup with prescribed injection and diffusive escape; 3D global effects on current-sheet statistics, reconnection rates, and photon transport could suppress the MeV tail or alter ion/electron energization, requiring at least a quantitative discussion or scaling test to support generalization beyond the local model.

    Authors: We agree that 3D global effects represent an important caveat for generalizing our local results. Full 3D global radiative PIC simulations remain computationally prohibitive at present. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph to §2 that supplies quantitative scaling estimates drawn from existing 3D MHD turbulence and reconnection studies, together with a brief assessment of how 3D photon transport might modify the MeV tail and temperature partition. These additions clarify the expected robustness of the reported features while acknowledging the limitations of the 2D local approximation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Spectral Results): The reported excellent agreement with NGC 4151 X-ray spectra is presented without error bars, resolution studies, or full parameter exploration, which undermines assessment of robustness given the local 2D approximation and limits in the reader's soundness evaluation.

    Authors: We have revised §4 to include error bars on the time-averaged spectra, obtained from the standard deviation across multiple simulation snapshots. We have also added a resolution-convergence study as Appendix B demonstrating that the spectral shape, including the MeV tail, is stable at our fiducial resolution. Although a complete parameter scan lies beyond the scope of this work, we now present results for two additional compactness values in §4 and discuss the sensitivity of the NGC 4151 agreement to these choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives its claims directly from 2D radiative PIC simulations with self-consistent Compton scattering, particle injection, diffusive escape, and turbulent dynamics. The agreement with NGC 4151 X-ray spectra is presented as post-simulation validation rather than an input parameter or fitted target. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-definitions, renamed fits, or self-citation chains; the two-temperature partition, nonthermal ion distributions, and MeV tail emerge from the simulated physics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard plasma-physics assumptions for PIC simulations and the local 2D approximation; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of particle-in-cell methods for collisionless electron-ion plasma with Compton scattering
    Invoked throughout the simulation setup described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Local 2D patch adequately represents global corona dynamics
    Stated as the basis for the model in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1324 out tokens · 53497 ms · 2026-05-16T18:49:02.388097+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada94b

    Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada94b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada94b 2025

  2. [2]

    Adkins, T., Meyrand, R., & Squire, J. 2025, ApJ, 990, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9b0 13 For completeness, we retain the electric field contribution and we use a relativistic definition of the bulk kinetic energy density, but we note that relativistic effects are mild in the regime of interest

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade9b0 2025

  3. [3]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    2018, ApJ, 862, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac820

    Ball, D., Sironi, L., & Özel, F. 2018, ApJ, 862, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac820

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac820 2018

  5. [5]

    J., Quataert, E., & Kunz, M

    Bambic, C. J., Quataert, E., & Kunz, M. W. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3261 18Grošelj et al

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3261 2024

  6. [6]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 161, High Energy Processes in Accreting Black Holes, ed. J. Poutanen & R. Svensson, 295, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9901108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9901108 1999

  7. [7]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ApJ, 850, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f4f 2017

  8. [8]

    2006, Phys

    Boldyrev, S. 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 115002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.115002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.115002 2006

  9. [9]

    M., Gladilin, P

    Bykov, A. M., Gladilin, P. E., & Osipov, S. M. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2755, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts553

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts553 2013

  10. [10]

    Chandran, B. D. G., Schekochihin, A. A., & Mallet, A. 2015, Astrophys. J., 807, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/39

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/39 2015

  11. [11]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 1241, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2513

    Chashkina, A., Bromberg, O., & Levinson, A. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1241, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2513

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2513 2021

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Cho, J., & Lazarian, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 325, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x 2003

  13. [13]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad51fe

    Comisso, L. 2024, ApJ, 972, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad51fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad51fe 2024

  14. [14]

    2018, Phys

    Comisso, L., & Sironi, L. 2018, PhRvL, 121, 255101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255101 —. 2019, ApJ, 886, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33 Del Gaudio, F., Grismayer, T., Fonseca, R. A., & Silva, L. O. 2020, Journal of Plasma Physics, 86, 905860516, doi: 10.1017/S002237782000118X

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.255101 2018

  15. [15]

    2007, A&A Rv, 15, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    Done, C., Gierliński, M., & Kubota, A. 2007, A&A Rv, 15, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 2007

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Ricci, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936817 2020

  17. [17]

    C., Lohfink, A., Belmont, R., Malzac, J., & Coppi, P

    Fabian, A. C., Lohfink, A., Belmont, R., Malzac, J., & Coppi, P. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2566, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx221

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx221 2017

  18. [18]

    C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al

    Fabian, A. C., Lohfink, A., Kara, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 4375, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1218

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1218 2015

  19. [19]

    Fiorillo, D. F. G., Comisso, L., Peretti, E., Petropoulou, M., & Sironi, L. 2024, ApJ, 974, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7021

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7021 2024

  20. [20]

    Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., & Fabian, A. C. 1993, MNRAS, 263, L9, doi: 10.1093/mnras/263.1.L9 Gierliński, M., & Zdziarski, A. A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, L84, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06890.x

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/263.1.l9 1993

  21. [21]

    1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    Goldreich, P., & Sridhar, S. 1995, ApJ, 438, 763, doi: 10.1086/175121

    work page doi:10.1086/175121 1995

  22. [22]

    A., Groˇ selj, D., & Bacchini, F

    Gorbunov, E. A., Grošelj, D., & Bacchini, F. 2025, PhRvL, 135, 065201, doi: 10.1103/3777-z37m Grošelj, D., Cerri, S. S., Bañón Navarro, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa894d Grošelj, D., Chen, C. H. K., Mallet, A., et al. 2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031037, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031037 Grošelj, D., Hakobyan, H., Beloborodov, A. M....

    work page doi:10.1103/3777-z37m 2025

  23. [23]

    2024, PhRvL, 132, 085202, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.085202

    Philippov, A. 2024, PhRvL, 132, 085202, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.085202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.085202 2024

  24. [24]

    W., Fabian, A

    Guilbert, P. W., Fabian, A. C., & Rees, M. J. 1983, MNRAS, 205, 593, doi: 10.1093/mnras/205.3.593

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/205.3.593 1983

  25. [25]

    Magnetic Reconnection and Associated Particle Acceleration in High-Energy Astrophysics

    Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Zenitani, S., & Hoshino, M. 2024, SSRv, 220, 43, doi: 10.1007/s11214-024-01073-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01073-2 2024

  26. [26]

    1993, ApJ, 413, 507, doi: 10.1086/173020

    Haardt, F., & Maraschi, L. 1993, ApJ, 413, 507, doi: 10.1086/173020

    work page doi:10.1086/173020 1993

  27. [27]

    1997, ApJ, 476, 620, doi: 10.1086/303656

    Haardt, F., Maraschi, L., & Ghisellini, G. 1997, ApJ, 476, 620, doi: 10.1086/303656

    work page doi:10.1086/303656 1997

  28. [28]

    2024, in Zenodo, Vol

    Hakobyan, H., Spitkovsky, A., Chernoglazov, A., et al. 2023, PrincetonUniversity/tristan-mp-v2: v2.6, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7566725

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7566725 2023

  29. [29]

    M., Philippov, A., Mbarek, R., et al

    Hankla, A. M., Philippov, A., Mbarek, R., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2478

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2478 2026

  30. [30]

    T., & Mushotzky, R

    Hinkle, J. T., & Mushotzky, R. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 4960, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1976

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1976 2021

  31. [31]

    Howes, G. G. 2010, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 409, L104, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x —. 2015, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373, 20140145, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0145

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x 2010

  32. [32]

    G., Cowley, S

    Howes, G. G., Cowley, S. C., Dorland, W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 590, doi: 10.1086/506172

    work page doi:10.1086/506172 2006

  33. [33]

    2023, PASJ, 75, L33, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad072

    Inoue, Y., & Khangulyan, D. 2023, PASJ, 75, L33, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad072

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psad072 2023

  34. [34]

    2019, ApJ, 880, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2715

    Inoue, Y., Khangulyan, D., Inoue, S., & Doi, A. 2019, ApJ, 880, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2715

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2715 2019

  35. [35]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Blaes, O., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2019, ApJ, 885, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a00

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a00 2019

  36. [36]

    2025, ARA&A, 63, 379, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052844

    Kara, E., & García, J. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 379, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052844

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052844 2025

  37. [37]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8794

    Kawamuro, T., Ricci, C., Imanishi, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8794

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8794 2022

  38. [38]

    Kawazura, Y., Barnes, M., & Schekochihin, A. A. 2019, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 771, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812491116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1812491116 2019

  39. [39]

    A., Barnes, M., et al

    Kawazura, Y., Schekochihin, A. A., Barnes, M., et al. 2020, Physical Review X, 10, 041050, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041050

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041050 2020

  40. [40]

    B., Quataert, E., et al

    Kempski, P., Fielding, D. B., Quataert, E., et al. 2025, ApJL, 994, L49, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1ca3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1ca3 2025

  41. [41]

    H., Osman, K

    Kiyani, K. H., Osman, K. T., & Chapman, S. 2015, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373, 20140155, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0155

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0155 2015

  42. [42]

    2025, ApJ, 993, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfddf

    Krawczynski, H., & Hu, K. 2025, ApJ, 993, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfddf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfddf 2025

  43. [43]

    C., et al

    Laha, S., Ricci, C., Mather, J. C., et al. 2025, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1530392, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1530392

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2024.1530392 2025

  44. [44]

    2012, SSRv, 173, 557, doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9936-7 Grošelj et al.19

    Lazarian, A., Vlahos, L., Kowal, G., et al. 2012, SSRv, 173, 557, doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9936-7 Grošelj et al.19

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9936-7 2012

  45. [45]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 063006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063006

    Lemoine, M., Murase, K., & Rieger, F. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 063006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063006 2024

  46. [46]

    2025, A&A, 697, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453296

    Lemoine, M., & Rieger, F. 2025, A&A, 697, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453296

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453296 2025

  47. [47]

    C., Howes, G

    Li, T. C., Howes, G. G., Klein, K. G., & TenBarge, J. M. 2016, ApJL, 832, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/832/2/L24

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/2/l24 2016

  48. [48]

    2023, ApJL, 944, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb6f4

    Porth, O. 2023, ApJL, 944, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb6f4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb6f4 2023

  49. [49]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2022, ApJL, 935, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac84db Lubiński, P., Beckmann, V., Gibaud, L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2454, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw454

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac84db 2022

  50. [50]

    Magdziarz, P., & Zdziarski, A. A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 837, doi: 10.1093/mnras/273.3.837

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/273.3.837 1995

  51. [51]

    M., et al

    Marcotulli, L., Ajello, M., Urry, C. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac937f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac937f 2022

  52. [52]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, L101306, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101306

    Mbarek, R., Philippov, A., Chernoglazov, A., Levinson, A., & Mushotzky, R. 2024, PhRvD, 109, L101306, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101306

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l101306 2024

  53. [53]

    L., Zdziarski, A

    McConnell, M. L., Zdziarski, A. A., Bennett, K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 984, doi: 10.1086/340436

    work page doi:10.1086/340436 2002

  54. [54]

    Begelman, M. C. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4532, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2745

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2745 2021

  55. [55]

    Meyrand, R., Kanekar, A., Dorland, W., & Schekochihin, A. A. 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 116, 1185, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813913116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1813913116 2019

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Moderski, R., Sikora, M., Coppi, P. S., & Aharonian, F. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 954, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09494.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09494.x 2005

  57. [57]

    Murase, C

    Buson, S. 2024, ApJL, 961, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad19c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad19c5 2024

  58. [58]

    S., & M´ esz´ aros, P

    Murase, K., Kimura, S. S., & Mészáros, P. 2020, PhRvL, 125, 011101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.011101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.011101 2020

  59. [59]

    Schnittman, J. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.03349, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.03349 Nättilä, J. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 7026, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51257-1 Nättilä, J., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2022, PhRvL, 128, 075101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.075101

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.03349 2026

  60. [60]

    Neronov, A., Savchenko, D., & Semikoz, D. V. 2024, PhRvL, 132, 101002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.101002 Nhat Ly, M., Inoue, Y., Sentoku, Y., & Sano, T. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.01999, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.01999

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.101002 2024

  61. [61]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1077, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02339-z

    Padovani, P., Resconi, E., Ajello, M., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1077, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02339-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02339-z 2024

  62. [62]

    2012, SSRv, 173, 535, doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9900-6

    Petrosian, V. 2012, SSRv, 173, 535, doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9900-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9900-6 2012

  63. [63]

    1998, Astrophys

    Quataert, E. 1998, Astrophys. J., 500, 978, doi: 10.1086/305770

    work page doi:10.1086/305770 1998

  64. [64]

    2023, ApJL, 952, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

    Ricci, C., Chang, C.-S., Kawamuro, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acda27 2023

  65. [65]

    E., Sironi, L., & Narayan, R

    Rowan, M. E., Sironi, L., & Narayan, R. 2017, ApJ, 850, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380 —. 2019, ApJ, 873, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380 2017

  66. [66]

    2026, PhRvD, 113, 023019, doi: 10.1103/f66p-k6z9

    Saurenhaus, L., Capel, F., Oikonomou, F., & Buchner, J. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 023019, doi: 10.1103/f66p-k6z9

    work page doi:10.1103/f66p-k6z9 2026

  67. [67]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Scepi, N., Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1424, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3299

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3299 2024

  68. [68]

    Schekochihin, A. A. 2025, Lectures on Kinetic Theory and Magnetohydrodynamics of Plasmas (Lecture Notes for the Oxford MMathPhys programme). http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/ AlexanderSchekochihin/KT/2015/KTLectureNotes.pdf

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    A., Cowley, S

    Schekochihin, A. A., Cowley, S. C., Dorland, W., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 310, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310 2009

  70. [70]

    L., Lightman, A

    Shapiro, S. L., Lightman, A. P., & Eardley, D. M. 1976, ApJ, 204, 187, doi: 10.1086/154162

    work page doi:10.1086/154162 1976

  71. [71]

    Sironi, L., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2020, ApJ, 899, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba622

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba622 2020

  72. [72]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4607

    Sironi, L., & Tran, A. 2024, ApJ, 968, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4607

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4607 2024

  73. [73]

    A., & Giannios, D

    Sironi, L., Uzdensky, D. A., & Giannios, D. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 127, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-020325-115713

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-020325-115713 2025

  74. [74]

    1962, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, 2nd edn

    Spitzer, L. 1962, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, 2nd edn. (New York: Interscience)

    work page 1962

  75. [75]

    A., Quataert, E., & Kunz, M

    Squire, J., Schekochihin, A. A., Quataert, E., & Kunz, M. W. 2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 905850114, doi: 10.1017/S0022377819000114

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377819000114 2019

  76. [76]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2025, ApJ, 979, 199, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada385

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada385 2025

  77. [77]

    Sridhar, N., Sironi, L., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 5625, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2534 —. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 1301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2730

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2534 2021

  78. [78]

    T., Strateva, I., Brandt, W

    Steffen, A. T., Strateva, I., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2826, doi: 10.1086/503627

    work page doi:10.1086/503627 2006

  79. [79]

    1983, MNRAS, 202, 467, doi: 10.1093/mnras/202.2.467

    Stepney, S. 1983, MNRAS, 202, 467, doi: 10.1093/mnras/202.2.467

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/202.2.467 1983

  80. [80]

    Stepney, S., & Guilbert, P. W. 1983, MNRAS, 204, 1269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/204.4.1269

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/204.4.1269 1983

Showing first 80 references.