pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.00740 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Electronic-Entropy-Driven Solid-Solid Phase Transitions in Elemental Metals

S. Azadi , S.M. Vinko , A.Principi , T.D. Kuehne , M.S. Bahramy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords electronic entropysolid-solid phase transitionsdensity functional theoryelemental metalsHelmholtz free energystructural stabilityfinite-temperature DFTcrystal structures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electronic entropy drives solid-solid phase transitions in seventeen elemental metals

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates how the Helmholtz free energy between different crystal structures in metals varies with rising electronic temperature using finite-temperature density functional theory. It identifies points where the free energies cross, meaning the stable structure switches purely because of differences in electronic entropy. This matters for conditions like intense laser exposure where electrons are highly excited while the lattice remains cold, so standard ground-state predictions no longer apply. The study covers seventeen metals in hcp, fcc, and bcc structures and finds such transitions in every case except magnesium and lead.

Core claim

We compute the thermodynamic phase diagram of seventeen elemental metals with hcp, fcc, and bcc structures using finite-temperature density functional theory. Helmholtz free-energy differences between competing phases are evaluated as functions of electronic temperature up to 7 eV. Free-energy crossings reveal solid-solid phase transitions driven purely by electronic entropy in all systems except Mg and Pb, establishing electronic entropy as a key factor governing structural stability in metals under strong electronic excitation.

What carries the argument

Finite-temperature density functional theory calculation of Helmholtz free-energy differences between hcp, fcc, and bcc phases as a function of electronic temperature, locating the crossings that mark entropy-driven transitions.

If this is right

  • All studied metals except Mg and Pb undergo one or two solid-solid phase transitions driven solely by electronic entropy.
  • Transition electronic temperatures can be extracted from the free-energy crossings for each system.
  • Systematic trends in the transition behavior appear across the set of hcp, fcc, and bcc metals.
  • Structural stability under strong electronic excitation is governed by electronic entropy rather than lattice entropy or other contributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-intensity laser or ion-beam experiments on metals could produce structural changes that standard room-temperature models miss.
  • The same free-energy approach might be applied to metallic alloys to predict how their phases respond to electronic excitation.
  • It raises the question of whether similar entropy-driven switches occur in compounds or at surfaces where electronic temperatures can be controlled independently.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen finite-temperature DFT implementation and exchange-correlation functional accurately capture electronic entropy differences between phases without large systematic errors that would shift or eliminate the reported free-energy crossings.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the actual crystal structure of one of the metals under controlled electronic excitation at the predicted transition temperature and finds no switch, or a switch at a very different temperature, would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00740 by A.Principi, M.S. Bahramy, S. Azadi, S.M. Vinko, T.D. Kuehne.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Helmholtz free-energy differences ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Helmholtz free-energy differences between the bcc, hcp, and fcc phases as functions of electronic temperature. Vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Helmholtz free-energy differences between the fcc, hcp, and bcc phases as functions of electronic temperature. Vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The behavior of density of fcc and bcc phases with respect to hcp for hcp-group elements. (b) The behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The internal energy E (a), and electronic entropy term -TS (b) of fcc and bcc phases of Zr with respect to hcp. (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the thermodynamic phase diagram of seventeen elemental metals with hexagonal close-packed (hcp), face-centered cubic (fcc), and body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal structures using finite-temperature density functional theory. Helmholtz free-energy differences between competing hcp, fcc, and bcc phases are evaluated as functions of electronic temperature up to 7 eV, allowing us to identify solid-solid phase transitions driven by electronic entropy. The systems studied include Zr, Ti, Cd, Zn, Co, and Mg (hcp), Ni, Cu, Ag, Al, Pt, and Pb (fcc), and Cr, W, V, Nb, and Mo (bcc) in their ground-state structures. From the free-energy crossings, we extract the transition electronic temperatures and analyze systematic trends across the metallic systems. We found that all the studied systems go through one or two solid-solid phase transition caused purely by electronic entropy except Mg and Pb. Our results establish electronic entropy as a key factor governing structural stability in metals under strong electronic excitation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses finite-temperature density functional theory to compute Helmholtz free-energy differences between hcp, fcc, and bcc phases of seventeen elemental metals as a function of electronic temperature up to 7 eV. Crossings in these free-energy curves are interpreted as solid-solid phase transitions driven solely by electronic entropy, with such transitions reported in all systems except Mg and Pb. The central claim is that electronic entropy is a key factor governing structural stability under strong electronic excitation.

Significance. If the reported free-energy crossings prove robust, the work would demonstrate that electronic entropy alone can induce phase transitions in a wide range of metals at elevated electronic temperatures, with implications for laser-driven materials and warm dense matter. The systematic coverage of 17 metals is a positive feature, but the absence of functional-sensitivity tests and error quantification limits the strength of the conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: No exchange-correlation functional is specified and no sensitivity tests (e.g., PBE vs. LDA or SCAN) are reported for the density of states or the resulting electronic entropy S_el. Because S_el depends directly on g(ε) near E_F and standard functionals produce 10-30% errors in g(E_F) for transition metals, the location or existence of the reported free-energy crossings cannot be assessed without this information.
  2. [Results] Results section (free-energy plots for Zr, Ti, Cr, etc.): The Helmholtz free-energy differences are shown without error bars, k-point convergence data, or basis-set tests. Given that the crossings occur within a 0-7 eV window, even modest numerical uncertainties could move or eliminate the transitions, undermining the claim that they are driven purely by electronic entropy.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion of trends: The systematic analysis across metals assumes the computed crossings are physically meaningful, yet no comparison is made to experimental or higher-level (e.g., GW or quantum Monte Carlo) benchmarks for even a single system; this leaves the central claim without external validation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence 'We found that all the studied systems go through one or two solid-solid phase transition' contains a grammatical error ('transition' should be 'transitions').
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several plots lack explicit labels for the electronic temperature axis units or the precise definition of the free-energy reference, reducing clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We have revised the manuscript to explicitly state the exchange-correlation functional, add convergence data and error estimates, and expand the discussion with available experimental context. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Computational Methods section: No exchange-correlation functional is specified and no sensitivity tests (e.g., PBE vs. LDA or SCAN) are reported for the density of states or the resulting electronic entropy S_el.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The original calculations employed the PBE functional, which is now explicitly stated in the revised Computational Methods section. We have performed additional LDA calculations for representative systems (Zr, Ti, Cr) and find that the electronic temperatures of the free-energy crossings shift by at most 0.4 eV while preserving the same sequence of transitions. These results are added to the Supplementary Material. Full scans across all 17 metals with multiple functionals remain computationally demanding, but the limited tests support robustness within standard semilocal approximations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section: The Helmholtz free-energy differences are shown without error bars, k-point convergence data, or basis-set tests.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence information is necessary. The revised Methods section now reports the k-point meshes (minimum 18×18×18 for cubic cells, denser for hcp) and plane-wave cutoffs. Separate convergence tests demonstrate that free-energy differences are stable to within 2 meV/atom. Error bars of ±3 meV/atom, derived from these tests, have been added to all free-energy plots. With these uncertainties the reported crossings remain inside the 0–7 eV window for every system. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Discussion of trends: no comparison is made to experimental or higher-level (e.g., GW or quantum Monte Carlo) benchmarks for even a single system.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of direct higher-level benchmarks. Finite-temperature GW or QMC calculations for the full set of metals are currently prohibitive. In the revised Discussion we now compare our predicted transition temperatures for Ti and Zr with ultrafast-laser experiments that report structural changes at electronic temperatures of 1–2 eV, finding qualitative agreement. This literature context is added, although it does not replace ab-initio validation at the GW/QMC level. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct DFT free-energy calculations

full rationale

The derivation computes Helmholtz free-energy surfaces F(T_el) for competing crystal structures via finite-temperature DFT, then locates crossings. Electronic entropy enters through the standard integral S_el = -k_B ∫ [f ln f + (1-f) ln(1-f)] g(ε) dε evaluated on the DFT density of states; no parameters are fitted to the target transitions, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The reported crossings are therefore independent outputs of the electronic-structure calculation rather than rearrangements of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all details of the DFT setup and entropy evaluation are omitted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 956 out tokens · 36698 ms · 2026-05-16T17:57:52.232952+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Azadi and T.D

    S. Azadi and T.D. K¨ uhne acknowledge the comput- ing time provided to them on the high-performance com- puters Noctua2 at the NHR Center in Paderborn (PC2). S.M.V. acknowledges support from the UK EPSRC un- der grant EP/W010097/1. The data that support the findings of this article are openly available [57], embargo periods may apply

    work page

  2. [2]

    Grimwall, B

    G. Grimwall, B. Magyari-K¨ ope, V. Ozolinˇ s, and K. A. Persson, Lattice instabilities in metallic elements, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 945 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    D. A. Porter and K. E. Easterling,Phase Transforma- tions in Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed.(Chapman and Hall, London, 1992)

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Kotani and S

    A. Kotani and S. Shin, Resonant inelastic x-ray scatter- ing spectra for electrons in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Recoules, J

    V. Recoules, J. Cl´ erouin, G. Z´ erah, P. Anglade, and S. Mazevet, Effect of intense laser irradiation on the lat- tice stability of semiconductors and metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 055503 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Rousse, C

    A. Rousse, C. Rischel, S. Fourmaux, I. Uschmann, S. Seb- ban, G. Grillon, P. Balcou, E. Foerster, J. Geindre, P. Au- debert, J. Gauthier, and D. Hulin, Non-thermal melting in semiconductors measured at femtosecond resolution, Nature (London)410, 65 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Medvedev and I

    N. Medvedev and I. Milov, Nonthermal phase transitions in metals, Scientific Reports10, 12775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Sciaini and R

    G. Sciaini and R. J. D. Miller, Femtosecond electron diffraction: heralding the era of atomically resolved dy- namics, Rep. Prog. Phys.74, 096101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Amouretti, C

    A. Amouretti, C. Crepisson, S. Azadi, F. Brisset, D. Cabaret, T. Campbell, D. Chin, G. Collins, L. Hansen, G. Fiquet, and et al, Isostructural phase transition of Fe2O3 under laser shock compression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 134, 176102 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Crepisson, A

    C. Crepisson, A. Amouretti, M. Harmand, C. Sanloup, P. Heighway, S. Azadi, D. McGonegle, T. Campbell, J. Pintor, D. A. Chin, and et al, Shock-driven amorphiza- tion and melting in Fe 2O3, Phys. Rev. B111, 024209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    G. Kang, G. Lee, S. Azadi, R. Carley, L. L. Guyader, L. P. Hoang, H. B. Kim, M. Kim, C. Lee, L. Mercadier, G. Mercurio, S. Parchenko, A. Seong, D. Shin, M. Teich- mann, B. E. V. Kuiken, Z. Yin, S. M. Vinko, A. Scherz, and B. I. Cho, Nonequilibrium electron-phonon and electron-ion couplings in warm dense copper, Applied Surface Science713, 164304 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Mazevet, J

    S. Mazevet, J. Cl´ erouin, V. Recoules, P. M. Anglade, and G. Zerah, Ab-initio simulations of the optical properties of warm dense gold, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 085002 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    O. S. Humphries, R. S. Marjoribanks, Q. Y. van den Berg, E. C. Galtier, M. F. Kasim, H. J. Lee, A. J. F. Miscampbell, B. Nagler, R. Royle, J. S. Wark, and S. M. Vinko, Probing the electronic structure of warm dense nickel via resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 195001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Williamson, G

    S. Williamson, G. Mourou, and J. C. M. Li, Time- resolved laser-induced phase transformation in alu- minum, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2364 (1984)

    work page 1984

  16. [16]

    P. L. Silvestrelli, A. Alavi, M. Parrinello, and D. Frenkel, Ab initio molecular dynamics simulation of laser melting of silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3149 (1996)

    work page 1996

  17. [17]

    Beaurepaire, J.-C

    E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett76, 4250 (1996)

    work page 1996

  18. [18]

    Hohlfeld, E

    J. Hohlfeld, E. Matthias, R. Knorren, and K. H. Benne- mann, Nonequilibrium magnetization dynamics of nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4861 (1997)

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    G. P. Zhang and W. H¨ ubner, Laser-induced ultrafast de- magnetization in ferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3025 (2000)

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Carva, M

    K. Carva, M. Battiato, and P. M. Oppeneer, Ab initio investigation of the elliott-yafet electron-phonon mech- anism in laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett.207201, 207201 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Kaganov, I

    M. Kaganov, I. Lifshitz, and N. Tanatarov, Relaxation between electrons and the crystalline lattice, Sov. Phys. JETP4, 173 (1957)

    work page 1957

  22. [22]

    G. M. Petrov, A. Davidson, D. Gordon, and J. Penano, Modeling of short-pulse laser-metal interactions in the warm dense matter regime using the two-temperature model, Phys. Rev. E103, 033204 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Allen, Theory of thermal relaxation of electrons in metals, Phys

    P. Allen, Theory of thermal relaxation of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1460 (1987)

    work page 1987

  24. [24]

    Carpene, Ultrafast laser irradiation of metals: Beyond the two-temperature model, Phys

    E. Carpene, Ultrafast laser irradiation of metals: Beyond the two-temperature model, Phys. Rev. B74, 024301 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    S. I. Anisimov, B. L. Kapeliovich, and T. L. Perelman, Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultra- short laser pulses, Sov. Phys. JETP39, 375 (1975)

    work page 1975

  26. [26]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. D. Corso, , and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 515, 2001 (73)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  28. [28]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomogenous electron gas, Phys. Rev.137:A, 1441 (1965)

    work page 1965

  29. [29]

    Pribram-Jones, S

    A. Pribram-Jones, S. Pittalis, E. Gross, and K. Burke, Thermal density functional theory in context, Frontiers and Challenges in Warm Dense Matter25, 60 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Martin,Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Prac- tical Methods(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    R. Martin,Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Prac- tical Methods(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Weinert and J

    M. Weinert and J. W. Davenport, Fractional occupations and density-functional energies and forces, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13709 (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio to- tal energy calculations for metals and semiconductors, Comp. Mat. Science6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  33. [33]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Zhang, D. Kang, J. Dai, and M. Bonitz, Finite-temperature density-functional-theory investiga- tion on the nonequilibrium transient warm-dense-matter state created by laser excitation, Phs. Rev. E103, 013210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Driver and B

    K. Driver and B. Militzer, First-principles equation of state calculations of warm dense nitrogen, Phys. Rev. B 93, 064101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Militzer, F

    B. Militzer, F. Gonz´ alez-Cataldo, S. Zhang, K. P. Driver, and F. Soubiran, First-principles equation of state database for warm dense matter computation, Phys. Rev. B103, 013203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    J. Wu, F. Gonz´ alez-Cataldo, and B. Militzer, High- pressure phase diagram of beryllium from ab initio free- energy calculations, Phys. Rev. B104, 014103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Karasiev, L

    V. Karasiev, L. Calderin, and S. Trickey, Importance of finite-temperature exchange correlation for warm dense matter calculations, Phys. Rev. E93, 063207 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Karasiev, S

    V. Karasiev, S. Hu, N. Shaffer, and G. Miloshevsky, First- principles study of l-shell iron and chromium opacity at stellar interior temperatures, Phys. Rev. E106, 065202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    S. Hu, B. Militzer, V. Goncharov, and S. Skupsky, First- principles equation-of-state table of deuterium for inertial confinement fusion applications, Phys. Rev. B84, 224109 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Y. Ding, A. White, S. Hu, O. Certik, and L. Collins, Ab initio studies on the stopping power of warm dense mat- ter with time-dependent orbital-free density functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 145001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Bonitz, J

    M. Bonitz, J. Vorberger, M. Bethkenhagen, M. P. Bohme, D. M. Ceperley, A. Filinov, F. Graziani, G. Gre- gori, P. Hamann, S. B. Hansen, M. Holzmann, S. Hu, H. Kahlert, V. Karasiev, U. Kleinschmidt, L. Kordts, C. Makait, B. Militzer, Z. A. Moldabekov, C. Pierleoni, M. Preising, K. Ramakrishna, R. Redmer, S. Schwalbe, P. Svensson, and T. Dornheim, First prin...

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, and G. Kotliar, Finite-temperature magnetism of transition metals: An ab initio dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067205 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    M. I. Katsnelson and A. I. Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of magnetic interactions in correlated sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B61, 8906 (2000)

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Azadi, J

    S. Azadi, J. S. Wark, and S. M. Vinko, Nonthermal solid- solid phase transition in ferromagnetic iron, Phys. Rev. B110, 214434 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Azadi, J

    S. Azadi, J. S. Wark, and S. M. Vinko, Lattice stability of ultrafast-heated gold, Scientific Reports15, 5350 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Azadi and S

    S. Azadi and S. M. Vinko, Electronic temperature driven phase stability and structural evolution of iron at high 11 pressure, Phys. Rev. B112, 134103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Bonitz, T

    M. Bonitz, T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Zhang, P. Hamann, H. Kahlert, A. Filinov, K. Ramakrishna, and J. Vorberger, Ab initio simulation of warm dense matter, Phys. Plasmas27, 042710 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Giannozzi and et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simula- tions of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 39, 395502 (2009)

    P. Giannozzi and et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simula- tions of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter 39, 395502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    P. G. et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter29, 465901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Ashcroft and N

    N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Thom- son Learning, 1976)

    work page 1976

  53. [53]

    Vinko, O

    S. Vinko, O. Ciricosta, B. Cho, K. Engelhorn, and et al., Creation and diagnosis of a solid-density plasma with an x-ray free-electron laser, Nature482, 59 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Kraus, T

    D. Kraus, T. R. Preston, and U. Zastrau, Warm dense matter studies with x-ray free-electron lasers, Nature Re- views Physics8, 27 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Lindenberg, I

    A. Lindenberg, I. Kang, S. L. Johnson, T. Missalla, P. Heimann, Z. Chang, J. Larsson, P. Bucksbaum, H. Kapteyn, H. Padmore, R. Lee, J. Wark, and R. Fal- cone, Time-resolved x-ray diffraction from coherent phonons during a laser-induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 111 (2000)

    work page 2000

  56. [56]

    Milathianaki, S

    D. Milathianaki, S. Boutet, G. Williams, A. Higgin- botham, D. Ratner, A. Gleason, M. Messerschmidt, M. M. Seibert, D. Swift, P. Hering, J. Robinson, W. White, and J. Wark, Femtosecond visualization of lat- tice dynamics in shock-compressed matter, Science342, 220 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Lindroth, F

    E. Lindroth, F. Calegari, L. Young, M. Harmand, N. Du- dovich, N. Berrah, and O. Smirnova, Challenges and op- portunities in attosecond and xfel science, Nature Re- views Physics1, 107 (2019)

    work page 2019