pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.01704 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.app-ph· quant-ph

Two-Qubit Module Based on Phonon-Coupled Ge Hole-Spin Qubits: Design, Fabrication, and Readout at 1-4 K

D.-M. Mei , S. A. Panamaldeniya , K.-M. Dong , S. Bhattarai , A. Prem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-phquant-ph
keywords germanium hole spinsphononic crystal cavitytwo-qubit moduledevice designcryogenic readoutspin-to-charge conversionnanofabricationquantum well
0
0 comments X

The pith

A complete fabrication blueprint for a phonon-coupled two-qubit module in Ge hole spins targets operation at 1-4 K.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper converts earlier theoretical models of phonon-engineered Ge qubits and phononic-crystal cavities into a specific two-qubit device layout that can be built and measured. It details the strained Ge quantum well, gate electrodes, PnC cavity geometry, membrane release process, and RF wiring, plus a spin-to-charge readout chain with noise budgets for single-shot detection above 1 K. A phased test sequence is given to first confirm charge stability and single-qubit control, then to search for resolvable phonon-mediated coupling. If the layout works, it supplies a concrete experimental platform for studying coherent phonon interactions between hole spins at temperatures reachable with simpler cryogenics.

Core claim

The authors deliver an experimentally actionable two-qubit module design that places two gate-defined hole-spin qubits inside a strained Ge quantum well and couples them through a GHz phononic-crystal defect mode, while specifying the full heterostructure stack, electrostatic gate layout, nanofabrication sequence, compatible readout architecture based on proximal charge sensing and RF reflectometry, and a link-budget calculation for 1-4 K operation.

What carries the argument

The GHz phononic-crystal defect mode that mediates coherent phonon coupling between the two gate-defined hole-spin qubits in the Ge quantum well.

If this is right

  • The outlined fabrication steps, including gate-stack formation and membrane release, can be executed to produce testable devices.
  • The RF reflectometry link budget gives concrete integration times and noise temperatures needed for single-shot readout at 1-4 K.
  • The stepwise benchmarking plan first verifies charge stability and single-qubit control before attempting to resolve two-qubit phonon coupling.
  • Phonon-bandgap suppression of relaxation can be checked directly in the fabricated cavity geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful phonon coupling at 1-4 K would relax the need for millikelvin dilution refrigerators in this qubit platform.
  • The same cavity-mediated interaction scheme could be extended to larger arrays once the two-qubit module is validated.
  • Temperature-dependent decoherence channels not captured in prior modeling could appear in the 1-4 K range and would need separate characterization.

Load-bearing premise

The phonon-engineered Ge qubits and PnC cavities modeled earlier will behave as predicted once placed in the proposed two-qubit geometry and operated at 1-4 K.

What would settle it

Fabricated devices show either no detectable phonon-mediated interaction or a coupling rate too small to produce observable entanglement or swapping within measured qubit coherence times.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.01704 by A. Prem, D.-M. Mei, K.-M. Dong, S. A. Panamaldeniya, S. Bhattarai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Conceptual cross-sectional layout of the Ge-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustrative SiGe/Ge heterostructure and materials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustrative nanofabrication process flow for the Ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustrative readout architecture and signal chain. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Illustrative cryogenic measurement setup for the Ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustrative data and target metrics for the exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Conceptual outlook for the Ge phonon-coupled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a device-level design study for a two-qubit module based on phonon-coupled germanium (Ge) hole-spin qubits targeted for operation at $1$--$4~\mathrm{K}$. Building on prior theoretical modeling of phonon-engineered Ge qubits and phononic-crystal (PnC) cavities, we translate those modeling results into a fabrication-oriented two-qubit layout that integrates two gate-defined hole-spin qubits in a strained Ge quantum well with a GHz PnC defect mode intended to mediate a coherent phonon-based interaction. We specify the SiGe/Ge heterostructure, electrostatic gate layout, PnC cavity geometry, and a compatible nanofabrication pathway, including gate-stack formation, membrane patterning and release, RF/DC wiring, and process-risk mitigation. We further develop a readout architecture combining spin-to-charge conversion with RF reflectometry on a proximal charge sensor, and we provide a link-budget estimate that states the assumed system noise temperature, RF signal contrast, and integration-time requirements for single-shot readout at elevated cryogenic temperatures. Finally, we outline a stepwise benchmarking program for charge stability, single-qubit control, phonon-bandgap modification of relaxation, and resolvable phonon-mediated two-qubit coupling. The manuscript does not report experimental device data; rather, it provides an experimentally actionable bridge from prior modeling to future fabrication and measurement of phonon-coupled Ge hole-spin modules.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a device-level design study for a two-qubit module based on phonon-coupled Ge hole-spin qubits operating at 1-4 K. It translates prior theoretical modeling of phonon-engineered qubits and PnC cavities into concrete specifications for the SiGe/Ge heterostructure, electrostatic gate layout, PnC defect-mode geometry, nanofabrication sequence (including membrane release and gate-stack formation), RF/DC wiring, and a readout scheme based on spin-to-charge conversion with proximal charge-sensor RF reflectometry. A link-budget estimate with explicit assumptions on noise temperature and integration time is provided, along with a stepwise benchmarking outline; no new experimental data or derivations are reported.

Significance. If the assumptions inherited from prior modeling prove accurate upon fabrication, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally actionable blueprint that could enable the first demonstration of coherent phonon-mediated two-qubit coupling in gate-defined Ge hole spins at elevated cryogenic temperatures. This would be a meaningful step toward scalable spin-qubit architectures that relax the need for millikelvin operation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Link-budget estimate] Link-budget section: the integration-time requirement for single-shot readout is stated under a specific system noise temperature; however, no sensitivity analysis or bounding range is supplied for plausible deviations in actual device noise at 1-4 K, which directly affects whether the claimed single-shot fidelity remains experimentally realistic.
  2. [PnC cavity geometry] PnC cavity geometry subsection: the defect-mode frequency and coupling strength are taken directly from prior modeling without re-deriving or quoting the explicit dependence on membrane thickness and hole radius used in the present layout; a short table or equation showing how the current parameters map onto the earlier results would make the translation verifiable.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite 'prior theoretical modeling' but do not list the specific references; these citations should be added explicitly.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the gate layout and PnC pattern would benefit from quantitative labels (e.g., gate pitch, hole radius) rather than qualitative descriptions alone.
  3. [Benchmarking program] The benchmarking program outline lists 'resolvable phonon-mediated two-qubit coupling' as a milestone but does not specify the target coupling strength or the measurement protocol (e.g., Ramsey or echo sequence) that would resolve it.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below and will update the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Link-budget estimate] Link-budget section: the integration-time requirement for single-shot readout is stated under a specific system noise temperature; however, no sensitivity analysis or bounding range is supplied for plausible deviations in actual device noise at 1-4 K, which directly affects whether the claimed single-shot fidelity remains experimentally realistic.

    Authors: We agree that a sensitivity analysis strengthens the link-budget section. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph (with an accompanying figure or table) that shows how the required integration time scales with system noise temperature for values between 5 K and 20 K while holding other parameters fixed. This will demonstrate that single-shot readout fidelity remains experimentally accessible even under moderately elevated noise levels consistent with 1–4 K operation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [PnC cavity geometry] PnC cavity geometry subsection: the defect-mode frequency and coupling strength are taken directly from prior modeling without re-deriving or quoting the explicit dependence on membrane thickness and hole radius used in the present layout; a short table or equation showing how the current parameters map onto the earlier results would make the translation verifiable.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The chosen membrane thickness (250 nm) and hole radius (120 nm) are selected to reproduce the ~4.5 GHz defect-mode frequency and coupling strength reported in our prior modeling. In the revision we will insert a compact table that lists the geometric parameters together with the resulting frequency and coupling values, explicitly referencing the relevant equations from the earlier work so that the mapping is directly verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: design translation from prior modeling

full rationale

The manuscript is a device-level design proposal that enumerates concrete fabrication steps, heterostructure specifications, PnC geometry, gate layouts, and readout architectures by translating results from prior theoretical modeling. No equations or derivations are presented that reduce a claimed prediction or result to its own inputs by construction. No fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops exist, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled via self-citation in a load-bearing way. The central claim is the provision of an experimentally actionable bridge, which is fulfilled by explicit process details and link-budget assumptions stated independently of the target performance claims. Self-citations to prior modeling serve only as input sources and do not create circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The design rests on the accuracy of prior phonon-coupling models for Ge hole spins together with assumptions about fabrication yield and readout sensitivity at 1-4 K; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the stated noise-temperature assumption in the link budget.

free parameters (1)
  • system noise temperature
    Value assumed in the RF link-budget estimate for single-shot readout performance at 1-4 K.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Prior theoretical modeling of phonon-engineered Ge qubits and PnC cavities accurately predicts device behavior
    The entire two-qubit layout, cavity geometry, and coupling strength estimates are derived directly from those models without independent re-derivation.
invented entities (1)
  • GHz PnC defect mode mediating phonon-based two-qubit interaction no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide coherent phonon-mediated coupling between the two gate-defined hole-spin qubits
    Proposed on the basis of prior modeling; no independent experimental confirmation is reported in this manuscript.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1470 out tokens · 40404 ms · 2026-05-16T18:31:25.680555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Watzinger, J

    H. Watzinger, J. Kukuˇ cka, L. Vukuˇ si´ c, C. Kloeffel, M. Veldhorst, D. Loss, and G. Katsaros, Nature Com- munications9, 3902 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Scappucci, C

    G. Scappucci, C. Kloeffel, F. A. Zwanenburg, D. Loss, M. Myronov, J.-J. Zhang, S. De Franceschi, G. Kat- saros, and M. Veldhorst, Nature Reviews Materials6, 926 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, M. Russ, F. van Rigge- len, S. L. de Snoo, R. N. Schouten, A. Sammak, G. Scap- pucci, and M. Veldhorst, Nature577, 487 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science 358, 199 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Arrangoiz-Arriola, E

    P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. A. Wollack, Z. Wang, M. Pechal, W. Jiang, M. Reagor, J. Aumentado, J. Vuckovic, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Nature571, 537 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Bienfait, K

    A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, A. N. Cleland,et al., Science364, 368 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    D.-M. Mei, S. A. Panamaldeniya, K.-M. Dong, S. Bhat- tarai, N. Budhathoki, and A. Warren, Quantum Science and Technology10, 045067 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    D.-M. Mei, N. Budhathoki, S. A. Panamaldeniya, K.-M. Dong, S. Bhattarai, A. Warren, A. Prem, and S. Chhetri, Physics of the Dark Universe50, 102165 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    W. I. L. Lawrie, T. McJunkin, N. W. Hendrickx, A. Sam- mak, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Applied Physics Reviews7, 041304 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    H. J. Kimble, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    L. C. Camenzindet al., Nature Electronics5, 178 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Benito, M

    M. Benito, M. Niklas, and G. Burkard, Physical Review B100, 125430 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1990)

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Petitet al., Nature580, 355 (2020)

    L. Petitet al., Nature580, 355 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    C. H. Yanget al., Nature580, 350 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Y.-X. Li, Z. Kong, S. Hou, G. Wang, and S. Huang, Phys- ical Review B108, 045303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Z. Kong, Z. Li, G. Cao,et al., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces15, 28799 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Tanaka, O

    T. Tanaka, O. Nakatsuka, N. Taoka,et al., Applied Physics Letters100, 222102 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Myronov, K

    M. Myronov, K. Sawano, Y. Shiraki, T. Mouri, and K. M. Itoh, Applied Physics Letters91, 082108 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    M. A. Zudov, O. A. Mironov, Q. A. Ebner, P. D. Martin, Q. Shi, and D. R. Leadley, Physical Review B89, 125401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Sammak, D

    A. Sammak, D. Sabbagh, N. W. Hendrickx,et al., Ad- vanced Functional Materials29, 1807613 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    A backgate for enhanced tunability of holes in planar germanium

    L. Ruggiero, A. Nigro, I. Zardo, and A. Hofmann, Nano Letters24, 13263 (2024), arXiv:2407.15725

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Zhang, G

    Y. Zhang, G. Cao, Z. Kong,et al., Journal of Semicon- ductors45, 122102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    L. A. Terrazos, C. Kloeffel, R. Winkler, and D. Loss, Physical Review B103, 115201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    W. J. H. Berghuis, S. Buckley, G. Scappucci,et al., Jour- nal of Applied Physics130, 135303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Sioncke, J

    S. Sioncke, J. Ceuppens, A. Delabie, D. Lin, M. Caymax, et al., Microelectronic Engineering88, 1553 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Sioncke, J

    S. Sioncke, J. Ceuppens, S. De Gendt,et al., Microelec- tronic Engineering88, 532 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Sardashti, K.-T

    K. Sardashti, K.-T. Hu, K. Tang, S. Madisetti, P. McIn- tyre, S. Oktyabrsky, S. Siddiqui, B. Sahu, N. Yoshida, J. Kachian, L. Dong, B. Fruhberger, and A. C. Kummel, Applied Physics Letters108, 011604 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    M. Ke, S. Ding, A. Guo,et al., Applied Physics Letters 109, 062103 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    H. Wen, X. Chen, H. Li,et al., AIP Advances10, 025020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Robertson, Reports on Progress in Physics69, 327 (2006)

    J. Robertson, Reports on Progress in Physics69, 327 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Delabie, B

    A. Delabie, B. Brijs, M. Caymax,et al., Journal of Ap- plied Physics97, 064104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Caymax, B

    M. Caymax, B. Brijs, A. Delabie,et al., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters9, G96 (2006)

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    V. A. Chellappan, S. Kumar, and M. K. Hudait, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology3, N35 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Breeden, S

    M. Breeden, S. Wolf, S. T. Ueda, K. Tang, P. McIntyre, and A. C. Kummel, Applied Surface Science478, 1065 (2019). 16

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Eichenfield, J

    M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, R. M. Camacho, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, Nature462, 78 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Tsaturyan, A

    Y. Tsaturyan, A. Barg, A. Simonsen, and A. Schliesser, Nature Nanotechnology12, 776 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. Luetolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, EPJ Quantum Technology6, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. Willems van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen, and L. P. Kouwen- hoven, Nature430, 431 (2004)

    work page 2004

  41. [41]

    K. Ono, D. G. Austing, Y. Tokura, and S. Tarucha, Sci- ence297, 1313 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    A. C. Johnson, J. R. Petta, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Nature435, 925 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Field, C

    M. Field, C. G. Smith, M. Pepper, D. A. Ritchie, J. E. F. Frost, G. A. C. Jones, and D. G. Hasko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1311 (1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    D. J. Reilly, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Appl. Phys. Lett.91, 162101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    J. I. Colless, A. C. Mahoney, J. M. Hornibrook, A. C. Doherty, D. J. Reilly, H. Lu, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 046805 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    A. C. Betz, R. Wacquez, M. Vinet, X. Jehl, A. L. Saraiva, M. Sanquer, A. J. Ferguson, and M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, Nano Letters15, 4622 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Morello, J

    A. Morello, J. J. Pla, F. A. Zwanenburg, K. W. Chan, H. Huebl, M. Mottonen, C. D. Nugroho, C. Yang, J. van Donkelaar, A. D. C. Alves, D. N. Jamieson, C. C. Es- cott, L. C. L. Hollenberg, R. G. Clark, and A. S. Dzurak, Nature467, 687 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Science309, 2180 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Lundberg, D

    T. Lundberg, D. J. Ibberson, J. Li, L. Hutin, J. C. Abadillo-Uriel, M. Filippone, B. Bertrand, A. Nun- nenkamp, and M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, npj Quantum In- formation10, 28 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Yoneda, K

    J. Yoneda, K. Takeda, T. Otsuka, T. Nakajima, M. R. Delbecq, G. Allison, T. Honda, S. Oda, Y. Hoshi, N. Us- ami, S. Saito, T. Ito, A. Oiwa, and S. Tarucha, Nature Nanotechnology13, 102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    A. West, B. Hensen, B. Undseth, S. Asaad, F. Torres, T. Tanttu, M. A. Fogarty, A. Laucht, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, M. Veldhorst, and A. S. Dzurak, Nature Nan- otechnology14, 437 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    J. M. Hornibrook, J. I. Colless, A. C. Mahoney, A. Powell, M. Wyn-Jones, J. R. Prance, H. Lu, A. C. Gossard, and D. J. Reilly, Phys. Rev. Applied3, 024010 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Weinreb, J

    S. Weinreb, J. C. Bardin, H. Mani, and G. Jones, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques55, 2306 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Barthel, M

    C. Barthel, M. Kjærgaard, J. Medford, M. Stopa, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. B 81, 161308 (2010)

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Lukashenko and A

    A. Lukashenko and A. V. Ustinov, Review of Scientific Instruments79, 084701 (2008)

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    Bluhm, S

    H. Bluhm, S. Foletti, I. Neder, M. Rudner, D. Ma- halu, V. Umansky, and A. Yacoby, Nature Physics7, 109 (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    Weinreb, in2007 USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting(2007) nRAO/Caltech technical report; cryo- genic LNA design for 1–2 GHz

    S. Weinreb, in2007 USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting(2007) nRAO/Caltech technical report; cryo- genic LNA design for 1–2 GHz

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    E. W. Bryerton, M. Morgan, and M. W. Pospieszalski, IEEE Radio Wireless Symp. , 358 (2013)

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    B. M. Freeman, J. S. Schoenfield, and H. Jiang, Applied Physics Letters108, 253108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Huang and X

    P. Huang and X. Hu, Physical Review B90, 045301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    A. V. Khaetskii, D. Loss, and L. Glazman, Physical Re- view B64, 125316 (2001)

    work page 2001

  62. [62]

    Hu and S

    X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review Letters96, 100501 (2006)

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    D. M. Zajac, A. J. Sigillito, M. Russ, F. Borjans, J. M. Taylor, G. Burkard, and J. R. Petta, Science359, 439 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Huang, C

    W. Huang, C. H. Yang, K. W. Chan, T. Tanttu, B. Hensen, R. C. C. Leon, M. A. Fogarty, J. C. C. Hwang, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, A. Morello, A. Laucht, and A. S. Dzurak, Nature569, 532 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    X. Mi, M. Benito, S. Putz, D. M. Zajac, J. M. Taylor, G. Burkard, and J. R. Petta, Nature555, 599 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    A. J. Landig, J. V. Koski, P. Scarlino, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Nature560, 179 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    L. M. K. Vandersypen, H. Bluhm, J. S. Clarke, A. S. Dzurak, R. Ishihara, A. Morello, D. J. Reilly, L. R. Schreiber, and M. Veldhorst, npj Quantum Information 3, 34 (2017)

    work page 2017