pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02904 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Probing the nature of Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole through gravitational wave forms from periodic orbits and quasiperiodic oscillations

Oreeda Shabbir , Abubakir Shermatov , Bushra Majeed , Tehreem Zahra , Mubasher Jamil , Javlon Rayimbaev
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black holegravitational wavesperiodic orbitsquasiperiodic oscillationsmicroquasarsrelativistic precessionMCMC constraintseffective potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

The parameters of Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black holes are constrained using gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits and quasiperiodic oscillations in microquasars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the motion of test particles around an Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole using the Hamiltonian formalism and derives the effective potential to locate the innermost stable and bound circular orbits. It shows that the Yukawa screening parameter and electric charge alter orbital stability and energy. Periodic orbits are classified by integer triplets and produce zoom-whirl patterns whose gravitational wave signals in both polarizations are computed. These signals and quasiperiodic oscillation frequencies are then fitted to observations of four microquasars and the galactic center via Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations within the relativistic precession model. A reader would care because this provides a concrete method to test whether astrophysical black holes exhibit nonlinear Maxwell or Yukawa modifications.

Core claim

The Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole supports periodic orbits labeled by integer triplets that display zoom-whirl behavior; the corresponding gravitational wave polarizations are derived from the geodesic motion, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis of quasiperiodic oscillations in the relativistic precession model constrains the Yukawa screening parameter and electric charge for microquasars and the galactic center.

What carries the argument

The effective potential for geodesic motion in the ENLMY spacetime, obtained via the Hamiltonian approach, which governs the stability of circular orbits and the characteristics of periodic orbits as functions of the Yukawa parameter and charge Q.

Load-bearing premise

The relativistic precession model maps the observed quasiperiodic oscillation frequencies directly to the geodesic orbital frequencies without needing additional corrections from the nonlinear Maxwell or Yukawa contributions.

What would settle it

Detection of quasiperiodic oscillation frequencies in a microquasar that lie outside the range producible by any combination of Yukawa parameter and charge Q in the MCMC posterior distribution would falsify the model for that source.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02904 by Abubakir Shermatov, Bushra Majeed, Javlon Rayimbaev, Mubasher Jamil, Oreeda Shabbir, Tehreem Zahra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plot of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Plot of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of angular momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Variation of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variation of angular momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Variation of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Allowed region (in the shadow) of the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Allowed region (in the shadow) of the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Zoom–whirl periodic orbits for the parameter set ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Zoom–whirl periodic orbits for the parameter set ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Zoom–whirl periodic orbits for the parameter set ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Zoom–whirl periodic orbits for the parameter set ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Right panel: Combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Right panel: Combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Keplerian frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Upper and lower frequencies observed around the BH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. Constraints on the BH mass, the Yukawa parameter, the BH charge and the radius of the QPO orbit from a four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we study gravitational wave emission from periodic orbits of test particles, analyze quasi periodic oscillations, and constrain the parameters of the static, spherically symmetric Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole. Using the Hamiltonian approach, we calculate the equations of motion of the particles. We analyze the effective potential to determine the innermost stable circular orbit and innermost bound circular orbit, illustrating how the Yukawa screening parameter and electric charge Q affect orbital stability and energy requirements. Periodic orbits are classified by integer triplets and exhibit characteristic zoom whirl behavior. Based on these orbits we compute the corresponding GW signals in both the polarizations. Finally, we perform Monte Carlo Markov Chain MCMC simulations to constrain the parameters of the ENLMY BH for four microquasars and the galactic center within the relativistic precession model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies test-particle dynamics in the static spherically symmetric Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole, computes gravitational-wave signals from periodic orbits classified by integer triplets, analyzes quasi-periodic oscillations via the relativistic precession model, and performs MCMC fits to constrain the Yukawa screening parameter and electric charge Q using data from four microquasars and the galactic center.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the explicit computation of GW polarizations from zoom-whirl periodic orbits and the effective-potential analysis of ISCO/IBCO stability add concrete results to the literature on modified black-hole spacetimes. The MCMC constraints, if robust, would provide observational bounds on this particular nonlinear electrodynamics plus Yukawa model.

major comments (2)
  1. [QPO and MCMC analysis section] The section describing the QPO analysis and MCMC fitting assumes that observed frequencies can be directly identified with the orbital, periastron-precession, and nodal-precession frequencies obtained from geodesic motion in the ENLMY metric. The nonlinear Maxwell and Yukawa terms modify the effective potential; without a derivation or numerical test showing that non-geodesic corrections to disk dynamics remain negligible, the resulting posteriors for the Yukawa parameter and Q may be systematically biased.
  2. [MCMC analysis section] The parameter constraints are obtained by fitting the model to observational QPO data via MCMC; the manuscript should explicitly discuss that these are not independent predictions and should include a sensitivity test to the RPM frequency-mapping assumption.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the workflow at high level but supplies no numerical results, error budgets, or constrained parameter values.
  2. [Introduction and metric section] The explicit form of the ENLMY metric and the definitions of the Yukawa screening parameter and charge Q should be stated at the beginning of the manuscript with consistent notation.
  3. [GW waveforms section] Clarify whether the GW waveforms are computed in the quadrupole approximation and how the two polarizations are extracted from the periodic-orbit trajectories.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and analysis where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [QPO and MCMC analysis section] The section describing the QPO analysis and MCMC fitting assumes that observed frequencies can be directly identified with the orbital, periastron-precession, and nodal-precession frequencies obtained from geodesic motion in the ENLMY metric. The nonlinear Maxwell and Yukawa terms modify the effective potential; without a derivation or numerical test showing that non-geodesic corrections to disk dynamics remain negligible, the resulting posteriors for the Yukawa parameter and Q may be systematically biased.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's point regarding potential non-geodesic effects. Our work follows the standard test-particle geodesic approximation in the ENLMY metric, which already incorporates the nonlinear Maxwell and Yukawa contributions into the spacetime geometry. For neutral particles, motion is geodesic by definition, and we have used the effective potential to determine ISCO and IBCO locations. We acknowledge that a complete treatment of charged fluid dynamics could introduce corrections. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated paragraph in the QPO section discussing this assumption, citing that such effects are typically subdominant in similar literature studies, and noting the limitation for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [MCMC analysis section] The parameter constraints are obtained by fitting the model to observational QPO data via MCMC; the manuscript should explicitly discuss that these are not independent predictions and should include a sensitivity test to the RPM frequency-mapping assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the MCMC results are model-dependent constraints within the relativistic precession model (RPM) rather than independent predictions. The revised manuscript now includes an explicit statement clarifying this point in the MCMC section. Additionally, we have performed and reported a sensitivity test by varying the frequency-mapping assumptions (e.g., small perturbations to the orbital, periastron, and nodal frequencies) and showing the impact on the posterior distributions for the Yukawa parameter and charge Q. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives equations of motion via Hamiltonian formalism, effective potential, ISCO/IBCO locations, periodic orbit classification by integer triplets, and GW polarizations directly from the ENLMY metric. These steps are independent of the later MCMC fitting. The MCMC step constrains parameters by matching computed geodesic frequencies (under the relativistic precession model) to observed QPO data for microquasars; this is standard parameter estimation and is not presented as an independent prediction that reduces to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional loops, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described chain. The derivation remains self-contained against external observational benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed validity of the ENLMY metric, geodesic motion via Hamiltonian, and the relativistic precession model for QPOs; no independent evidence for these is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • Yukawa screening parameter
    Fitted via MCMC to microquasar data; value not reported in abstract
  • electric charge Q
    Fitted via MCMC to microquasar data; value not reported in abstract
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Spacetime is described by the static spherically symmetric Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa metric
    Taken as the background geometry for all orbital calculations
  • standard math Test-particle motion obeys the Hamiltonian geodesic equations
    Standard GR treatment invoked without derivation
  • domain assumption Relativistic precession model correctly relates QPO frequencies to orbital frequencies
    Used to link observations to the metric parameters
invented entities (1)
  • Einstein nonlinear Maxwell Yukawa black hole no independent evidence
    purpose: Modified black hole solution incorporating nonlinear Maxwell and Yukawa terms
    Postulated metric whose parameters are being constrained

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1460 out tokens · 50482 ms · 2026-05-16T17:19:32.463353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A144, 425 (1934)

    work page 1934

  3. [3]

    YUKAWA, Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan

    H. YUKAWA, Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series17, 48 (1935)

    work page 1935

  4. [4]

    Gravitational wave ra- diation from periodic orbits and quasi-periodic oscil- lations in Einstein non-linear Maxwell-Yukawa black hole,

    T. Zahra, O. Shabbir, B. Majeed, M. Jamil, J. Rayim- baev, and A. Shermatov, European Physical Journal C 85, 1340 (2025), arXiv:2510.22761 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Cruz-Osorio, S

    A. Cruz-Osorio, S. Gimeno-Soler, J. A. Font, M. De Lau- rentis, and S. Mendoza, Phys. Rev. D103, 124009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    De Martino, M

    I. De Martino, M. De Laurentis, F. Atrio- Barandela, and S. Capozziello, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society442, 921 (2014), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/442/2/921/5729104/stu903.pdf

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Analysis of the Yukawa gravitational potential in $f(R)$ gravity II: relativistic periastron advance

    M. De Laurentis, I. De Martino, and R. Lazkoz, Phys. Rev. D97, 104068 (2018), arXiv:1801.08136 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    The Newtonian Limit of F(R) gravity

    S. Capozziello, A. Stabile, and A. Troisi, Phys. Rev. D 76, 104019 (2007), arXiv:0708.0723 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    S. H. Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1950120 (2019), arXiv:1901.05449 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Zahid, C

    M. Zahid, C. Shen, J. Rayimbaev, B. Rahmatov, I. Ibrag- imov, S. Muminov, and M. Umaraliyev, Physics of the Dark Universe50, 102124 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Stella, M

    L. Stella, M. Vietri, and S. M. Morsink, Astrophys. J. Lett.524, L63 (1999)

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    ˇCadeˇ z, M

    A. ˇCadeˇ z, M. Calvani, and U. Kosti´ c, Astron. Astrophys. 487, 527 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Twin peaks kHz QPOs: mathematics of the 3:2 orbital resonance

    P. Rebusco, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.56, 553 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403341

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    Lense-Thirring Precession and QPOs in Low Mass X-Ray Binaries

    L. Stella and M. Vietri, Astrophys. J. Lett.492, L59 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  15. [15]

    Shaymatov, M

    S. Shaymatov, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, and K. Bamba, The European Physical Journal C82(2022), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10560-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10560-1 2022

  16. [16]

    Rayimbaev, B

    J. Rayimbaev, B. Majeed, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, and A. Wang, Physics of the Dark Universe35, 100930 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Zanardi and L

    M. Ghasemi-Nodehi, M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, K. Jusufi, and M. Jamil, Physical Review D102(2020), 10.1103/phys- revd.102.104032

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2020

  18. [18]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, M. Jamil, S.-W. Wei, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Physical Review D103(2021), 10.1103/physrevd.103.024013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.024013 2021

  19. [19]

    Azreg-A¨ ınou, Z

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, Z. Chen, B. Deng, M. Jamil, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, and Y.-K. Lim, Physical Review D102(2020), 10.1103/physrevd.102.044028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.044028 2020

  20. [20]

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Good- man, PASP125, 306 (2013), arXiv:1202.3665 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Precise mass and spin measurements for a stellar-mass black hole through X-ray timing: the case of GRO J1655-40

    S. Motta, T. Belloni, L. Stella, T. Mu˜ noz-Darias, and R. Fender, MNRAS437, 2554 (2014), arXiv:1309.3652 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Motta, T

    S. Motta, T. Belloni, L. Stella, G. Pappas, J. Casares, A. Mu˜ noz-Darias, M. Torres, and I. Yanes-Rizo, MNRAS 517, 1469 (2022), arXiv:2209.10376 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Black hole spin measurements through the relativistic precession model: XTE J1550-564

    S. Motta, T. Munoz-Darias, A. Sanna, R. Fender, T. Bel- loni, and L. Stella, MNRAS Letters439, 65 (2014), arXiv:1312.3114 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    C. Liu, H. Xu, H. Siew, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, and Y. Zhao, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.12323 (2023), arXiv:2305.12323 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    C. Liu, H. Siew, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, Y. Zhao, and H. Xu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2311.12423 (2023), arXiv:2311.12423 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko,Classical mechanics (2002)

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(2017)

    C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Shabbir, M

    O. Shabbir, M. Jamil, and M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, Physics of the Dark Universe47, 101816 (2025), arXiv:2501.04367 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Zoom-Whirl Orbits in Black Hole Binaries

    J. Healy, J. Levin, and D. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 131101 (2009), arXiv:0907.0671 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits

    J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, Phys. Rev. D77, 103005 (2008), arXiv:0802.0459 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Babak, H

    S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D75, 024005 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0607007 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Detecting fundamental fields with LISA observations of gravitational waves from ex- treme mass-ratio inspirals,

    A. Maselli, N. Franchini, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, S. Barsanti, and P. Pani, Nature Astronomy6, 464 (2022), arXiv:2106.11325 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Liang, R

    D. Liang, R. Xu, Z.-F. Mai, and L. Shao, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044053 (2023), arXiv:2212.09346 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Rayimbaev, P

    J. Rayimbaev, P. Tadjimuratov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, and M. Khudoyberdieva, Galaxies9, 75 (2021), arXiv:2010.12863 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    A physical interpretation of the variability power spectral components in accreting neutron stars

    A. Ingram and C. Done, Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc405, 2447 (2010), arXiv:0907.5485 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    J. L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, and E. Gourgoulhon, Astron.Astrophys.356, 612 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0002394 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    Quasi Periodic Oscillations in Low Mass X-Ray Binaries and Constraints on the Equation of State of Neutron Star Matter

    C. Schaab and M. K. Weigel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 718 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9904211 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  38. [38]

    Timescale of twin-peak quasi-periodic oscillations and mass of accreting neutron stars

    G. T¨ or¨ ok, K. Goluchov´ a, E.ˇSr´ amkov´ a, M. Urbanec, and O. Straub, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.488, 3896 (2019), arXiv:1907.05174 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Millisecond Oscillations in X-Ray Binaries

    M. van der Klis, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys38, 717 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0001167 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [40]

    Correlations in the QPO Frequencies of Low Mass X-Ray Binaries and the Relativistic Precession Model

    L. Stella, M. Vietri, and S. M. Morsink, The Astrophys- ical Journal524, L63 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9907346 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Excitation of Disk Oscillations by Warps: A Model of kHz QPOs

    S. Kato, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan56, 905 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409051 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  42. [42]

    Frequency Correlation of QPOs Based on a Resonantly-Excited Disk-Oscillation Model

    S. Kato, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan60, 889 (2008), arXiv:0803.2384 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Rayimbaev, R

    J. Rayimbaev, R. C. Pantig, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, A. Abdujab- barov, and D. Demir, Annals of Physics454, 169335 (2023), arXiv:2206.06599 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Rayimbaev, B

    J. Rayimbaev, B. Ahmedov, and A. H. Bokhari, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D31, 2240004-726 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    D. R. Pasham, T. E. Strohmayer, and R. F. Mushotzky, 19 Nature513, 74 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Weighing the black holes in ultraluminous X-ray sources through timing

    P. Casella, G. Ponti, A. Patruno, T. Belloni, G. Mini- utti, and L. Zampieri, MNRAS387, 1707 (2008), arXiv:0804.3378 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    G. C. Dewangan, L. Titarchuk, and R. E. Griffiths, The Astrophysical Journal637, L21 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0509646 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Mucciarelli, P

    P. Mucciarelli, P. Casella, T. Belloni, L. Zampieri, and P. Ranalli, MNRAS365, 1123 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0509796 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Identification of the X-Ray Thermal Dominant State in an Ultraluminous X-Ray Source in M82

    H. Feng and P. Kaaret, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters712, L169 (2010), arXiv:1003.0283 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    The ultra-luminous X-ray source in M82: an intermediate mass black hole with a giant companion

    A. Patruno, S. Portegies Zwart, J. Dewi, and C. Hop- man, MNRAS370, L6 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0602230 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Calibrating the correlation between black hole mass and X-ray variability amplitude: X-ray only black hole mass estimates for active galactic nuclei and ultra-luminous X-ray sources

    X.-L. Zhou, S.-N. Zhang, D.-X. Wang, and L. Zhu, The Astrophysical Journal710, 16 (2010), arXiv:0912.2636 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    J. A. Orosz, J. F. Steiner, J. E. McClintock, M. A. P. Tor- res, R. A. Remillard, C. D. Bailyn, and J. M. Miller, The Astrophysical Journal730, 75 (2011), arXiv:1101.2499 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    T. E. Strohmayer, Astrophys. J552, L49 (2001)

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    J. M. Miller, A. C. Fabian, J. Kaastra, T. Kallman, A. L. King, D. Proga, J. Raymond, and C. S. Reynolds, The Astrophysical Journal814, 87 (2015), arXiv:1510.01177 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Testing the nature of the black hole candidate in GRO J1655-40 with the relativistic precession model

    C. Bambi, European Physical Journal C75, 162 (2015), arXiv:1312.2228 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Zahra, M

    T. Zahra, M. Jamil, and M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, Nucl. Phys. B1017, 116954 (2025), arXiv:2505.06443 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Jumaniyozov, M

    S. Jumaniyozov, M. Zahid, M. Alloqulov, I. Ibragimov, J. Rayimbaev, and S. Murodov, European Physical Jour- nal C85, 126 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Jumaniyozov, S

    S. Jumaniyozov, S. U. Khan, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujab- barov, S. Urinbaev, and S. Murodov, European Physical Journal C84, 964 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Rahmatov, M

    B. Rahmatov, M. Zahid, J. Rayimbaev, R. Rahim, and S. Murodov, Chinese Journal of Physics92, 143 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Rayimbaev, S

    J. Rayimbaev, S. Murodov, A. Shermatov, and A. Yusupov, European Physical Journal C84, 1114 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Murodov, J

    S. Murodov, J. Rayimbaev, B. Ahmedov, and E. Karim- baev, Universe9, 391 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Rayimbaev, N

    J. Rayimbaev, N. Juraeva, M. Khudoyberdiyeva, A. Ab- dujabbarov, and M. Abdullaev, Galaxies11, 113 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Rayimbaev, U

    J. Rayimbaev, U. Eshimbetov, B. Majeed, A. Ab- dujabbarov, A. Abduvokhidov, B. Abdulazizov, and A. Xalmirzayev, Chinese Physics C48, 055104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Caliskan, G

    A. Caliskan, G. Mustafa, T. Naseer, S. K. Maurya, E. G¨ udekli, S. Murodov, and F. Atamurotov, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics44, 99 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Mustafa, E

    G. Mustafa, E. Demir, F. Javed, S. K. Maurya, E. G¨ udekli, S. Murodov, and F. Atamurotov, Physics of the Dark Universe46, 101708 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Mitra, J

    S. Mitra, J. Vrba, J. Rayimbaev, Z. Stuchlik, and B. Ahmedov, Physics of the Dark Universe46, 101561 (2024)

    work page 2024