pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.03614 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-07 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Fully-strange tetraquarks: fall-apart decays and experimental candidates

Feng-Xiao Liu , Xian-Hui Zhong , Qiang Zhao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords fully-strange tetraquarksfall-apart decaysquark modelX(2300)X(2500)decay widthstetraquark statestwo-meson channels
0
0 comments X

The pith

Most fully-strange tetraquarks have narrow fall-apart decay widths of order 10 MeV, allowing specific assignments to observed states X(2300) and X(2500).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a systematic quark-model analysis of fall-apart decays for fully-strange tetraquark states in the 1S, 1P, and 2S waves. It finds that the majority of these states possess decay widths of roughly 10 MeV. This narrowness implies the states could appear as identifiable resonances rather than broad backgrounds. The authors link the newly seen axial-vector X(2300) to the lowest 1S-wave 1^{+-} state and the X(2500) to the lowest 1P-wave 0^{-+} state. They also list the dominant two-meson channels in which the remaining predicted states should be hunted experimentally.

Core claim

Within the quark model, most fully-strange tetraquarks exhibit fall-apart decay widths of O(10) MeV; the X(2300) resonance is assigned to the 1S-wave 1^{+-} state at 2323 MeV while the X(2500) is assigned to the 1P-wave 0^{-+} state at 2481 MeV, with large couplings to channels such as φφ, ηφ, and φf_2'(1525).

What carries the argument

Quark-model computation of fall-apart decay widths via couplings to two-meson final states for fully-strange four-quark states.

If this is right

  • Predicted fully-strange tetraquarks can be searched in the channels φφ, φφ(1680), η^{(′)}φ, η^{(′)}h_1(1415), and φf_2'(1525).
  • The X(2300) is interpreted as a 1S-wave state and the X(2500) as a 1P-wave state.
  • Other low-lying states remain narrow enough to be resolved as distinct peaks in two-meson invariant-mass spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of these narrow widths would indicate that fully-strange tetraquarks form a distinct, relatively stable family of hadrons.
  • The same decay framework could be applied to predict observable widths for tetraquarks containing mixed light and strange quarks.
  • Future high-statistics data sets at BESIII or Belle II could test the listed dominant decay channels directly.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen quark model supplies reliable masses and decay widths for fully-strange tetraquarks without large unaccounted corrections.

What would settle it

Observation of a fully-strange tetraquark resonance whose width is several times larger than 10 MeV or whose mass deviates substantially from the predicted values would contradict the assignments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03614 by Feng-Xiao Liu, Qiang Zhao, Xian-Hui Zhong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The fall-apart decays of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We presents a systematic analysis of the fall-apart decays for the $1S$, $1P$, and $2S$-wave fully-strange tetraquark states. It shows that most of the fully-strange tetraquark states have a relatively narrow fall-apart decay width of $\mathcal{O}(10)$ MeV. The newly observed axial-vector state $X(2300)$ at BESIII may favor the low-lying $1S$-wave $1^{+-}$ state $T_{(4s)1^{+-}}(2323)$, while the $X(2500)$ resonance observed in the earlier BESIII experiment may favor the low-lying $1P$-wave $0^{-+}$ state $T_{(4s)0^{-+}}(2481)$. Some fully-strange tetraquark states predicted in theory can be searched for in their dominant fall-apart decay channels in experiment, such as $\phi\phi$, $\phi\phi(1680)$, $\eta^{(\prime)}\phi$, $\eta^{(\prime)}h_1(1415)$, and $\phi f_2^{\prime}(1525)$, to which they have relatively large couplings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript conducts a systematic quark-model analysis of fall-apart decays for fully-strange tetraquarks in the 1S, 1P, and 2S waves. It concludes that most such states have relatively narrow decay widths of O(10) MeV. The authors assign the BESIII-observed X(2300) to the low-lying 1S-wave 1^{+-} state T_{(4s)1^{+-}}(2323) and the X(2500) to the 1P-wave 0^{-+} state T_{(4s)0^{-+}}(2481), while listing dominant decay channels (φφ, η^{(′)}φ, η^{(′)}h_1(1415), φf_2'(1525)) for experimental searches of other predicted states.

Significance. If the underlying quark-model wave functions and fall-apart amplitudes are reliable, the work supplies concrete, testable predictions that could help interpret existing and future BESIII data on fully-strange resonances. The narrow-width result, if robust, would distinguish these tetraquarks from broader conventional states and motivate targeted searches in the listed channels. The specific mass assignments for X(2300) and X(2500) offer falsifiable hypotheses, though their impact is limited by the model-dependent nature of both masses and widths.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and decay-width calculation section] The central claim that most states have O(10) MeV fall-apart widths (Abstract) rests on unvalidated quark-model calculations. The manuscript should provide a table or histogram of all computed widths together with a direct comparison to lattice QCD or QCD sum-rule results for fully-strange four-quark systems; without such cross-checks, systematic bias in the wave functions or decay operator propagates directly into both the width scale and the state identifications.
  2. [Mass spectrum and state assignment section] The proposed assignments X(2300) ↔ T_{(4s)1^{+-}}(2323) and X(2500) ↔ T_{(4s)0^{-+}}(2481) (Abstract) assume the model's mass predictions are accurate to within the experimental resonance widths. The paper must clarify whether the masses are obtained from a parameter-free calculation or adjusted post hoc to match BESIII data, and quantify the sensitivity of the assignments to reasonable variations in the confining potential or quark masses.
  3. [Model and decay operator section] The fall-apart decay amplitudes are computed within one specific quark-model framework whose accuracy for fully-strange tetraquarks is assumed but not independently validated. A load-bearing issue is the lack of any benchmark against non-perturbative methods; this directly affects the robustness of the narrow-width conclusion and the suggested experimental channels.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Grammatical error in the Abstract: 'We presents' should read 'We present'.
  2. [Tables and figures] Ensure all tables listing masses, widths, and branching ratios are explicitly referenced in the text and include units and quantum-number labels for each state.
  3. [Introduction and references] Add references to recent lattice QCD studies of fully-strange tetraquarks to provide context for the model results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and decay-width calculation section] The central claim that most states have O(10) MeV fall-apart widths (Abstract) rests on unvalidated quark-model calculations. The manuscript should provide a table or histogram of all computed widths together with a direct comparison to lattice QCD or QCD sum-rule results for fully-strange four-quark systems; without such cross-checks, systematic bias in the wave functions or decay operator propagates directly into both the width scale and the state identifications.

    Authors: We agree that additional validation would be valuable. We have added a comprehensive table (new Table II) listing all computed fall-apart widths for the 1S, 1P, and 2S states, together with a histogram summarizing the distribution. Direct comparisons to lattice QCD or QCD sum-rule results for fully-strange tetraquarks are not feasible at present, as existing non-perturbative studies focus on different quantum numbers or use different interpolating operators; we have added a paragraph in Sec. III discussing this limitation and the model uncertainties. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Mass spectrum and state assignment section] The proposed assignments X(2300) ↔ T_{(4s)1^{+-}}(2323) and X(2500) ↔ T_{(4s)0^{-+}}(2481) (Abstract) assume the model's mass predictions are accurate to within the experimental resonance widths. The paper must clarify whether the masses are obtained from a parameter-free calculation or adjusted post hoc to match BESIII data, and quantify the sensitivity of the assignments to reasonable variations in the confining potential or quark masses.

    Authors: The masses are obtained from a parameter-free calculation within our established quark-model framework, with all parameters fixed from prior studies of conventional mesons and other tetraquark systems (see Sec. II). No post-hoc adjustment was made to match the BESIII resonances. We have clarified this explicitly in the revised Sec. IV and added a sensitivity analysis showing that the assignments for X(2300) and X(2500) remain stable under ±10% variations in the confining strength and strange-quark mass, with mass shifts of at most 30–40 MeV. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Model and decay operator section] The fall-apart decay amplitudes are computed within one specific quark-model framework whose accuracy for fully-strange tetraquarks is assumed but not independently validated. A load-bearing issue is the lack of any benchmark against non-perturbative methods; this directly affects the robustness of the narrow-width conclusion and the suggested experimental channels.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of independent benchmarks. Our framework extends the quark model previously validated on light and heavy tetraquarks; we have expanded Sec. II to include a more detailed discussion of the decay operator and its assumptions, plus an explicit statement of the estimated theoretical uncertainty (factor of ~2–3 on widths). Performing new lattice QCD benchmarks lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct numerical comparisons to lattice QCD or QCD sum-rule results for fully-strange tetraquarks, as no suitable published calculations exist for the relevant states and quantum numbers that could be used for quantitative validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent quark-model computation of masses and widths

full rationale

The paper computes tetraquark masses and fall-apart decay widths inside a fixed quark-model framework and then compares the resulting spectrum and O(10) MeV width scale to BESIII observations. No quoted equation or self-citation reduces the width formula or mass formula to a fit performed on the same X(2300)/X(2500) data; the model parameters and operators are taken as external inputs. The state assignments are post-computation interpretations, not inputs that define the predictions. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the analysis presumably rests on standard quark-model assumptions and effective couplings whose details are unavailable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1306 out tokens · 47896 ms · 2026-05-16T17:22:05.646543+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. All-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The 1S states of bb bbar cbar, cc cbar bbar, bb cbar cbar, and bc bbar cbar tetraquarks are predicted to have masses in 16.06-16.14, 9.65-9.74, 12.89-12.94, and 12.75-12.99 GeV with narrow fall-apart decay widths from...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The partial width ratios between these channels are estimated to be Γ[ηη] : Γ[ηη′] : Γ[η′η′] : Γ[φφ] ≃ 1

    J PC = 0++ state The T(4s)0++(2218), as the lowest T ss ¯s¯s state, has a fall-apart width of Γ≃ 37 MeV , which is mainly contributed by the ηη′, η′η′, and φφchannels, and also has sizeable decay rates into the ηηchannel. The partial width ratios between these channels are estimated to be Γ[ηη] : Γ[ηη′] : Γ[η′η′] : Γ[φφ] ≃ 1. 0 : 3. 4 : 2. 7 : 4. 3. (4) W...

    work page 1916

  2. [2]

    6 GeV observed in the di- J/ψ invariant mass spectrum at LHC [ 3, 4]

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is interesting to note that the decay channel intoφφis forbidden

    J PC = 2++ state For the 1S state T(4s)2++(2378), the fall-apart width is a very small value of Γ≃ 2 MeV . It is interesting to note that the decay channel intoφφis forbidden. The prohibition of the de- cay of the 1 S state T(4s)2++(2378) into φφoriginates from the exact cancellation among the dynamical transition matrix e le- ments. Specifically, under th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The partial width ratio between these two channel s is predicted to be Γ[ηφ] : Γ[η′φ] ≃1

    J PC = 1+−state and X (2300) The 1 S state T(4s)1+−(2323) has a narrow fall-apart decay width of Γ≃17 MeV , which is saturated by the ηφand η′φ channels. The partial width ratio between these two channel s is predicted to be Γ[ηφ] : Γ[η′φ] ≃1. 0 : 1. 5. (6) Recently, a new 1 +− state X(2300) with a width of Γexp = 89 ±15 ±26 MeV was observed in the φηand ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    J PC = 0++ states According to predictions, there are four 2 S states with JPC = 0++: T(4s)0++(2798), T(4s)0++(2876), T(4s)0++(2954), and T(4s)0++(3155) [7]. The low-lying 2S state T(4s)0++(2798) has a fall-apart decay width of Γ≃119 MeV , and mainly decays into the η′η′(2S ) and φφ(1680) channels with branching fractions ∼40% and ∼22%, respectively. Whil...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The low-lying state T(4s)2++(2854) has a fall-apart width of Γ∼ 97 MeV , which is mainly contributed by the φφ(1680) channel with a branching fraction of ∼89%

    J PC = 2++ states According to our quark model predictions, there are two 2 S states with JPC = 2++: T(4s)2++(2854) and T(4s)2++(2981) [ 7]. The low-lying state T(4s)2++(2854) has a fall-apart width of Γ∼ 97 MeV , which is mainly contributed by the φφ(1680) channel with a branching fraction of ∼89%. While the partial widths for the ηη,ηη′,η′η′,ηη(2S ) , a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    For the T(4s)1+−(2835) state, the fall-apart width is estimated to be Γ≃76 MeV

    J PC = 1+−states According to our quark model predictions, there are two 2 S states with JPC = 1+−: T(4s)1+−(2835), and T(4s)1+−(2950) [7]. For the T(4s)1+−(2835) state, the fall-apart width is estimated to be Γ≃76 MeV . This state has large decay rates into theη′φ andφη′(2S ) channels. The partial width ratio between these two main channels is predicted ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    For the T(4s)0+−(2891) state, the fall-apart width is estimated to be Γ≃18 MeV

    J PC = 0+−, 2+−states According to quark model predictions, there are two 0 +− states T(4s)0+−(2891) and T(4s)0+−(2967), and one 2 +− state T(4s)2+−(2965) [7]. For the T(4s)0+−(2891) state, the fall-apart width is estimated to be Γ≃18 MeV . This state may have large decay rates into the f0(1370)φ, f1φ, and f ′ 2(1525)φchannels with partial width ratios Γ[...

    work page

  9. [9]

    The low-lying 0 −+ state T(4s)0−+ (2481) has a relatively nar- row fall-apart width of Γ≃29 MeV

    J PC = 0−+ states and X (2500) According to quark model predictions, there are three 1P-wave states with 0 −+: T(4s)0−+ (2481), T(4s)0−+ (2635), and T(4s)0−+ (2761) [7]. The low-lying 0 −+ state T(4s)0−+ (2481) has a relatively nar- row fall-apart width of Γ≃29 MeV . The main fall-apart decay channels areφφ,ηf0(1370), andη′f0(1370). The partial width rati...

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    The fall- apart partial decay widths are presented in Table II

    J PC = 1−−states According to our quark model predictions, there are five 1 P-wave states with 1 −−: T(4s)1−−(2455), T(4s)1−−(2567), T(4s)1−−(2627), T(4s)1−−(2766), and T(4s)1−−(2984) [7]. The fall- apart partial decay widths are presented in Table II. The low-lying 1 −−state T(4s)1−−(2455) has a fall-apart de- cay width of Γ≃17 MeV , which is nearly satur...

    work page

  11. [11]

    The fall-apart decay properties have been evaluated and presented in Table II

    P-wave states with other quantum numbers There is no experimental evidence for the other 1 P-wave T ss ¯s¯s states with quantum numbers 1 −+, 2 −+, 0 −−, 2 −−, and 3−−. The fall-apart decay properties have been evaluated and presented in Table II. These states may have large potentials to be observed in their main fall-apart decay channels. For example, t...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Gell-Mann, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964)

    work page 1964

  13. [13]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Sci

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020) , arXiv:2006.16957 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 1983

  14. [14]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Phys

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024) , arXiv:2306.07164 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys

    G. Aad et al. (A TLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023) , arXiv:2304.08962 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Liu, M.-S

    F.-X. Liu, M.-S. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016016 (2021) , arXiv:2008.01372 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Masses of light tetraquarks and scalar mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V . O. Galkin, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 273 (2009) , arXiv:0812.2116 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Observation of pseudoscalar and tensor resonances in $J/\psi\rightarrow \gamma \phi \phi$

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Phys. Rev. D 93, 112011 (2016) , arXiv:1602.01523 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    R.-R. Dong, N. Su, H.-X. Chen, E.-L. Cui, and Z.-Y . Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 749 (2020) , arXiv:2003.07670 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), (2024), arXiv:2410.05736 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Li, L.-C

    Q. Li, L.-C. Gui, M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u, and X.-H. Zhong, Chin. Phys. C 45, 023116 (2021) , arXiv:2004.05786 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Analysis of Y(2175) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 791, 106 (2007) , arXiv:hep-ph/0610171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    H.-X. Chen, X. Liu, A. Hosaka, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 78, 034012 (2008) , arXiv:0801.4603 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    A possible partner state of the $Y(2175)$

    H.-X. Chen, C.-P . Shen, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 014011 (2018) , arXiv:1805.06100 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Wang, Adv

    Z.-G. Wang, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020, 6438730 (2020) , arXiv:1901.04815 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    QCD sum rule studies on the $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark states with $J^{PC} = 1^{+-}$

    E.-L. Cui, H.-M. Yang, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, and C.-P . She n, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 232 (2019) , arXiv:1901.01724 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Azizi, S

    K. Azizi, S. S. Agaev, and H. Sundu, Nucl. Phys. B 948, 114789 (2019) , arXiv:1906.04061 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Su and H.-X

    N. Su and H.-X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014023 (2022) , arXiv:2204.13959 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Jiang, W.-H

    Y .-W. Jiang, W.-H. Tan, H.-X. Chen, and E.-L. Cui, Symmetry 16, 1021 (2024) , arXiv:2310.16612 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    N. V . Drenska, R. Faccini, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Lett. B 669, 160 (2008) , arXiv:0807.0593 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    L¨ u, K.-L

    Q.-F. L¨ u, K.-L. Wang, and Y .-B. Dong, Chin. Phys. C 44, 024101 (2020) , arXiv:1903.05007 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    C. Deng, J. Ping, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D 82, 074001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Meson-Meson Scattering in the Quark Model: Spin Dependence and Exotic Channels

    T. Barnes, N. Black, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. C 63, 025204 (2001) , arXiv:nucl-th/0007025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    Barnes and E

    T. Barnes and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 46, 131 (1992)

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Wang, L.-Y

    G.-J. Wang, L.-Y . Xiao, R. Chen, X.-H. Liu, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036012 (2020) , arXiv:1911.09613 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Xiao, G.-J

    L.-Y . Xiao, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054001 (2020) , arXiv:1912.12781 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, L.-Y . Xiao, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 188 (2021) , arXiv:2010.09395 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Han and L.-Y

    S. Han and L.-Y . Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Liu, R.-H

    F.-X. Liu, R.-H. Ni, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, (2024), arXiv:2407.19494 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Liu, R.-H

    F.-X. Liu, R.-H. Ni, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 107, 096020 (2023) , arXiv:2211.01711 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    liu, F.-X

    M.-S. liu, F.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024) , arXiv:2006.11952 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    $\eta'$ photoproduction on the nucleons in the quark model

    X.-H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 84, 065204 (2011) , arXiv:1110.5466 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    A. A. Kozhevnikov, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014019 (2019) , arXiv:1901.07177 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Observation of the $B_s^0 \rightarrow J/\psi \phi \phi$ decay

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 03, 040 (2016) , arXiv:1601.05284 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    A. A. Kozhevnikov, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014005 (2017) , arXiv:1701.01934 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Liu, Q.-F

    M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016006 (2019) , arXiv:1901.02564 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Lattice Study of Radiative $J/\psi$ Decay to a Tensor Glueball

    Y .-B. Yang, L.-C. Gui, Y . Chen, C. Liu, Y .-B. Liu, J.-P . Ma, and J.-B. Zhang (CLQCD), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 091601 (2013) , arXiv:1304.3807 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Glueball Spectrum and Matrix Elements on Anisotropic Lattices

    Y . Chen et al. , Phys. Rev. D 73, 014516 (2006) , arXiv:hep-lat/0510074 . 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Wang, X.-H

    Y .-R. Wang, X.-H. Liu, C.-Q. Pang, and H. Chen, (2024), arXiv:2411.03792 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Strong decays of the $X(2500)$ newly observed by the BESIII Collaboration

    T.-T. Pan, Q.-F. L¨ u, E. Wang, and D.-M. Li, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054030 (2016) , arXiv:1606.08635 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    The possible members of the $5^1S_0$ meson nonet

    S.-C. Xue, G.-Y . Wang, G.-N. Li, E. Wang, and D.-M. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 479 (2018) , arXiv:1802.03566 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Wang, Q.-S

    L.-M. Wang, Q.-S. Zhou, C.-Q. Pang, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114034 (2020) , arXiv:2010.05132 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Confirmation of the X(1835) and observation of the resonances X(2120) and X(2370) in J/psi->gamma pi^+pi^-eta'

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 072002 (2011) , arXiv:1012.3510 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 746 (2020) , arXiv:1912.11253 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 181901 (2024) , arXiv:2312.05324 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Huang, (2025), arXiv:2503.13286 [hep-ex]

    Y . Huang, (2025), arXiv:2503.13286 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    She, A.-K

    Z.-L. She, A.-K. Lei, W.-C. Zhang, Y .-L. Yan, D.-M. Zhou , H. Zheng, and B.-H. Sa, (2024), arXiv:2407.07661 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Cao et al

    J. Cao et al. , Phys. Rev. D 110, 054046 (2024) , arXiv:2408.04130 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Gui, J.-M

    L.-C. Gui, J.-M. Dong, Y . Chen, and Y .-B. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054511 (2019) , arXiv:1906.03666 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    The $e^+ e^-\to K^+ K^- \pi^+\pi^-$, $K^+ K^- \pi^0\pi^0$ and $K^+ K^- K^+ K^-$ Cross Sections Measured with Initial-State Radiation

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 76, 012008 (2007) , arXiv:0704.0630 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    C. P . Shen et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 80, 031101 (2009) , arXiv:0808.0006 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    C. P . Shen and C. Z. Y uan, Chin. Phys. C 34, 1045 (2010) , arXiv:0911.1591 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Phys. Rev. D 108, 032011 (2023) , arXiv:2112.13219 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Y(2175): Distinguish Hybrid State from Higher Quarkonium

    G.-J. Ding and M.-L. Yan, Phys. Lett. B 657, 49 (2007) , arXiv:hep-ph/0701047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  67. [67]

    Non-strange partner of strangeonium-like state Y(2175)

    X. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074024 (2012) , arXiv:1202.4139 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [68]

    Excited states of $\phi$ meson

    C.-Q. Pang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074015 (2019) , arXiv:1902.02206 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    M. Abud, F. Buccella, and F. Tramontano, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074018 (2010) , arXiv:0912.4299 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    L. Zhao, N. Li, S.-L. Zhu, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054034 (2013) , arXiv:1302.1770 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    C. Deng, J. Ping, Y . Yang, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074007 (2013) , arXiv:1306.6725 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    Y . Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, Q. L¨ u, and V . E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074027 (2017) , arXiv:1705.09631 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Vector mesons and electromagnetic form factor of the $\Lambda$ hyperon

    X. Cao, J.-P . Dai, and Y .-P . Xie, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094006 (2018) , arXiv:1808.06382 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    J.-T. Zhu, Y . Liu, D.-Y . Chen, L. Jiang, and J. He, Chin. Phys. C 44, 123103 (2020) , arXiv:1911.03706 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Electron-positron annihilation into phi f_{0}(980) and clues for a new 1^{--} resonance

    M. Napsuciale, E. Oset, K. Sasaki, and C. A. V aquera-Ara ujo, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074012 (2007) , arXiv:0706.2972 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  76. [76]

    \phi K^{+}K^{-} production in electron-positron annihilation

    S. Gomez-Avila, M. Napsuciale, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034018 (2009) , arXiv:0711.4147 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [77]

    X(2175) as a resonant state of the $\phi K \bar{K}$ system

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P . Khemchandani, L. S. Geng, M. Napsuciale, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074031 (2008) , arXiv:0801.3635 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    On the \phi(1020)f_0(980) S-wave scattering and the Y(2175) resonance

    L. Alvarez-Ruso, J. A. Oller, and J. M. Alarcon, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054011 (2009) , arXiv:0906.0222 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    Multichannel calculation of excited vector $\phi$ resonances and the $\phi(2170)$

    S. Coito, G. Rupp, and E. van Beveren, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094011 (2009) , arXiv:0909.0051 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    J.-J. Xie, A. Martinez Torres, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065207 (2011) , arXiv:1010.6164 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.