Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The microscopic D-brane description of a non-BPS extremal four-charge Reissner-Nordström black hole admits no zero-energy ground state, even classically.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 11:12 UTC pith:TNG6SBIV

load-bearing objection Plausible but unproven claim that non-BPS extremal black holes have no classical extremal microstate, resting on a dimension count and a single numerical sample; deserves review but needs significant strengthening. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.07032 v1 pith:TNG6SBIV submitted 2026-01-11 hep-th

Classical Unattainability of Extremality in non-BPS D-brane Systems

Pranav Kumar , Swapnamay Mondal This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords non-BPS black holesextremalityD-brane worldline theoryzero-energy vacuumconfigurational entropyN=8 string theorysupersymmetry breakingReissner-Nordström black holes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that extremality, the fine-tuned condition that a black hole's ground state has exactly zero energy, is classically unattainable for a certain non-BPS four-charge Reissner-Nordström black hole in N=8 string theory. The microscopic D-brane description is a worldline quantum mechanics whose potential receives gauge, D-term, and F-term contributions. Because the brane configuration breaks supersymmetry, the F-term equations lose holomorphicity, and the resulting system becomes over-constrained, with more independent real equations than variables. The authors show that the potential generically has no zero-energy minimum, so no extremal state exists even classically, and they propose reading the black hole entropy as the logarithm of the number of isolated minima. If correct, this would explain why non-BPS extremal black holes lack a degenerate protected ground state and why their near-horizon AdS2 should be destabilized.

Core claim

The central claim is that the worldline potential of the D-brane system—built from four stacks (three D2-branes wrapping distinct two-cycles and one D6-brane wrapping the full T^6)—admits no configuration where V_gauge, V_D, and V_F all vanish. Vanishing of V_F requires F_ij = 0 and G_ij = 0; eliminating the Φ-fields from the G-equations produces six E-consistency equations. The F and E equations give twelve complex (twenty-four real) conditions, and the three D-term equations add three real conditions; after removing three gauge redundancies this leaves twenty-four real independent equations for twenty-one real variables. The system is therefore over-constrained, so zero-energy minima do no

What carries the argument

The key object is the worldline potential V = V_gauge + V_D + V_F for the D-brane stacks, with complex scalars Z_ij from strings stretched between stacks and Φ-fields parametrizing the compact directions. The argument's engine is a counting mismatch: the F-term equations lose holomorphicity once R-symmetry rotations mix in complex conjugation, so the F, G, E, and D equations impose twenty-four real independent constraints on twenty-one real variables. This over-constraint is what rules out zero-energy minima; the analogous counting would fail in the BPS case because holomorphicity makes the equations linearly dependent.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that the twenty-four real equations—the F- and E-equations plus the three D-terms, after gauge fixing—are genuinely independent for the physical parameter values; if any of these equations is redundant, zero-energy minima could reappear.

What would settle it

A single explicit solution of the full set of equations V_gauge = V_D = V_F = 0 with non-vanishing Z-fields for any admissible choice of the constants c_ij, c'_ij, c_k would falsify the generic claim; more directly, exhibiting a linear dependence among the six E-equations (3.6) for a given parameter choice would restore the balance of twenty-one equations in twenty-one variables and reopen the possibility of extremal vacua.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the potential genuinely has no zero-energy vacuum, an extremal non-BPS four-charge black hole has no classical microstate of zero energy, so extremality is classically unattainable in the D-brane description.
  • The positive minimum energy is incompatible with a stable near-horizon AdS2, suggesting the AdS2 throat is destabilized for non-BPS extremal configurations.
  • Black hole entropy in this regime is not a count of degenerate ground states but the logarithm of the number of isolated minima of the microscopic potential, a form of configurational entropy.
  • The system possesses multiple continua of local minima representing marginally bound states in which D-brane subsets separate; these lie below the fully unbound configuration but above the true bound minima.
  • The argument's structure—loss of holomorphicity in F-term equations due to R-symmetry rotations—should generalize to other non-BPS extremal D-brane systems built by flipping charge signs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the paper leaves implicit is that if the over-constraint persists at large charges, non-BPS extremal black holes would have no exact microstate at any charge, strengthening the case that such solutions exist only in an approximate or transient sense.
  • One testable extension would be to check whether the number of isolated minima (twelve in the example) is invariant under changes of the background parameters c_ij, c'_ij, c_k; invariance would suggest a hidden protected quantity despite the absence of supersymmetry.
  • The positive ground-state energy implies a spectral gap in the worldline theory; a direct probe would be to compute low-temperature corrections to the entropy and look for a gap rather than the degenerate-ground-state behavior of BPS systems.
  • The closing observation about extending branes along flat directions to obtain a D5-D5-D5-D9 system with positive cosmological constant, if pursued, could connect this potential landscape to de Sitter model building.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the worldline theory of a non-BPS extremal four-charge Reissner-Nordström black hole in N=8 string theory has no classical zero-energy minimum, so extremality is classically unattainable. The argument in §2 is a dimension-counting argument: the F-term equations are claimed to lose holomorphicity (and hence the enhanced complexified-gauge symmetry) in the non-BPS system, making the total number of real equations exceed the number of real variables. Section 3 applies this to a D2–D2–D2–D6 system with a specific potential from [28]. The authors count 24 real equations in 21 real variables after gauge fixing, conclude that zero-energy vacua are generically absent, and support this by a numerical search for one parameter set. They also propose that black hole entropy is S_brane = log(#isolated minima), finding 12 isolated minima for their sample. Continua of partially bound and unbound minima are catalogued.

Significance. If the central claim were rigorously established, this would be a significant result: it would imply that non-BPS extremal black holes have no classical D-brane microstate of zero energy, casting doubt on the existence of a near-horizon AdS2 and on the notion of extremality itself for such systems. The explicit potential and the enumeration of minima are useful concrete data, and the contrast with the supersymmetric case (footnote 3) is a valuable observation. The paper also connects the number of isolated minima to a configurational-entropy-like quantity, which is an interesting proposal. However, the no-extremality claim rests on an unproved independence of the equations and on a single numerical sample; the entropy identification is not derived independently. The paper ships no code or data, so the numerical evidence is not reproducible. These gaps are load-bearing for the main claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.4)–(3.6)] The central count of 24 real equations versus 21 real variables is not self-consistent as written. V_F in (3.4) contains |F^{ij}|^2 for all twelve ordered pairs i≠j, and in (3.5) F^{ij} and F^{ji} are not identically equal (they involve c_{ij}+c'_{ji} and c_{ji}+c'_{ij}, respectively). The text says 'for every pair (ij), we have two equations: F_{ij}=0, E_{ij}=0', which counts six F equations, not twelve. Unless a relation such as F^{ji}=(F^{ij})^* is proved, the count is incorrect. The overconstraint conclusion also requires that the six E-equations are algebraically independent of the F- and D-equations for the physical parameter values; losing C*×C*×C* invariance does not by itself establish independence. This needs a proof or a well-documented symbolic computation.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (3.12)] The identification S_brane = log(#isolated minima) is not derived. The argument first fixes an expectation 'in the ballpark of 12' from the BPS index [32], then finds exactly 12 isolated minima and interprets this as confirmation. This is circular: the target number is imported from the BPS system, so the match does not independently validate the proposal. The paper needs a principled reason why the number of isolated minima (rather than, say, gauge-inequivalent critical points or minima weighted by Hessian factors) is the black hole entropy, and why it should coincide with the BPS index.
  3. [§4, final paragraph] The authors state that lowering the c-parameters lowers the minima, and that in the limit where all these parameters vanish the 12 minima become zero-energy (with a continuum of marginal configurations). This explicitly shows that the no-zero-energy property is parameter-dependent. The dimension-counting argument in §3.2 establishes at most a generic statement for generic coefficients, while the physical parameters are fixed by the background metric and B-field. The numerical evidence for the single parameter set (3.8) therefore cannot by itself support the general claim. A theorem or a systematic scan over the physical parameter region is needed.
  4. [§3.3, numerical search] The claim that 'several hundred runs' with different learning rates, initial conditions, and parameter values always yield exactly three quadruplets is not reproducible: no code, data, seeds, or parameter ranges are provided. The only stated criterion is a gradient norm below 10^{-7}, which does not distinguish true minima from slow-gradient points. This numerical evidence is load-bearing for the absence of zero-energy minima, so the manuscript should ship the code and describe the search algorithm and stopping criteria in sufficient detail.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.3)] Φ(31) is defined identically to Φ(12) (both are Φ1_3 − Φ2_3). Presumably Φ(31) should be the difference in a different complex plane, e.g. Φ^3_2 − Φ^1_2 or similar. Please fix the typo.
  2. [§3.2, gauge fixing] After stating that Z^{12}, Z^{23}, Z^{34} are fixed to be real and positive, the text does not explain whether this is always possible with the U(1)^3 gauge freedom, given that positivity is an inequality. A brief comment on the phase-fixing mechanism would be helpful.
  3. [Table 1] The column 'unfixed fields' lists Φ fields, but in §3.2 the Φ fields are solved in terms of the Z fields (or left unfixed when some G-equations drop out). Please clarify what is meant by 'unfixed' and how the Φ degrees of freedom are counted in each partially bound manifold.
  4. [Footnote 3] The statement that in the supersymmetric case the six analogous equations reduce to three independent ones is central to the contrast being drawn. As written it is an assertion; a derivation or reference would strengthen the argument.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central no-extremality derivation is self-contained; the entropy identification is calibrated to the BPS index 12 and then reported as a finding.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3, eq. (3.12), around 'Recall that our initial hunch was...']
    "Recall that our initial hunch was that we should look for a number in the ballpark of 12, the index for the corresponding BPS system. We are inclined to believe the appearance of exactly the same number of isolated minima as in the BPS case is of some significance. Hence we propose that in the current settings, the logarithm of the number of isolated potential minima should be interpreted as the black hole entropy."

    The only external anchor for the proposed entropy is the BPS index 12 from [32]. The paper first fixes the target ('look for a number in the ballpark of 12'), then numerically finds 12 isolated minima, and then defines S_brane := log(#isolated minima). On the chosen parameter set this gives log(12), matching the input target by construction. Thus the statement that 'the black hole entropy is found to be the logarithm of the number of isolated minima' is not an independent non-BPS prediction; it is a self-calibrated definition. This does not undermine the separate no-extremality argument, which is derived directly from the potential equations and numerical search.

full rationale

The paper's main claim—that the non-BPS D-brane potential fails to admit any zero-energy minimum—is not circular. It follows from the explicit potential (3.1)–(3.5): a zero-energy minimum requires V_gauge=V_D=V_F=0; eliminating the Φ fields from the G-equations produces the consistency conditions E_ij=0 in (3.6); the paper then argues for an overconstrained system, 24 real independent equations versus 21 real variables after gauge fixing, and supports this with a numerical search. That chain does not assume the target conclusion. The main weakness—that algebraic independence of the E-equations is asserted rather than proved, and that 'generically' does not automatically cover the physical parameter values—is a correctness risk, not circularity. The self-citation to [28] supplies the form of the D-brane potential, but the no-extremality result is argued from the potential in the present paper rather than imported wholesale from [28]; therefore no separate load-bearing self-citation step is flagged. The one genuinely self-referential step is the entropy identification in Section 3.3: the target number 12 is taken from the BPS index, the numerical search finds 12 isolated minima, and then S_brane is defined as log(#isolated minima). This makes the entropy 'finding' consistent with its input by construction, although it is secondary to the principal extremality claim. Overall score 4: one non-central result reduces to its calibration input, while the central derivation retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper's central results rest on a specific D-brane potential taken from the authors' earlier work, an interpretation of extremality as zero ground-state energy, and a genericity assumption about equation independence; it also relies on the BPS index of the cousin system to motivate an entropy interpretation. No new particles or forces are introduced; the only new postulated object is the microstate-counting entropy S_brane=log(#minima).

free parameters (2)
  • Fayet-Iliopoulos parameters c_k = c1=1, c2=2, c3=3, c4=-6
    Chosen 'for specificity' in §3.3 (eq. 3.8) to run the numerical minimization; the central no-extremality claim is demonstrated only for this choice.
  • Potential coefficients c_ij+c'_ij = 2/3, 3/5, 5/7, 7/11, 11/13, 13/17
    Hand-picked rational numbers in eq. (3.8); not derived from a physical background, though the authors claim the qualitative result is robust across changes.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Extremality equals vanishing ground state energy of the worldline Hamiltonian.
    Invoked in §1 and §2; the whole question is framed in these terms.
  • domain assumption The potential (3.1)-(3.5) from [28] is the complete low-energy classical potential of the D2-D2-D2-D6 system.
    Used as the starting point in §3.1; any missing interaction or higher-order term could change the existence of zero-energy minima.
  • domain assumption The 24 real equations F=E=D=0 are independent after gauge fixing, with no hidden redundancy for the non-BPS signs.
    Central to the §3.2 counting; in the BPS cousin complexified gauge symmetry reduces the number of independent E-equations.
  • standard math Overdetermined systems of N real equations in M<N real variables generically have no solution.
    Used in §3.2's genericity argument.
  • ad hoc to paper For large charges the non-BPS extremal black hole has the same Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as its BPS cousin; this is assumed to hold approximately for small charges.
    Stated explicitly in §3.3 as the best available guess, used to set the 'ballpark of 12' for the entropy.
  • domain assumption Numerical minimization with TensorFlow explores the full landscape of the potential and finds all isolated minima.
    Underpins the reported 12 isolated minima and marginal continua in §3.3-§3.4; no code or global-optimization guarantee is provided.
invented entities (1)
  • S_brane = log(#isolated minima) no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed microscopic definition of black hole entropy for non-BPS extremal systems.
    §3.3, eq. (3.12). No independent derivation; calibrated to the BPS index 12 and not checked against any independent non-BPS entropy computation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13267 in / 18965 out tokens · 186432 ms · 2026-08-03T11:12:14.180649+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

For the worldline theory of an extremal black hole, extremality amounts to vanishing ground state energy. In light of recent gravity results one would expect much like the ground state degeneracy this fine tuned condition too will not be met. It is unclear though whether this should be a quantum artefact or classical. In this paper we consider a non-BPS extremal four-charge Reissner Nordstrom black hole in N = 8 String theory. It is shown that the microscopic D-brane description fails to admit any extremal state, even classically. This positive energy is expected to destabilize the near horizon AdS2. The positive minimum energy is a direct consequence of the pattern of supersymmetry breaking by the D-branes. The black hole entropy is found to be the logarithm of the number of isolated minima and hence is related to the configurational entropy of the microscopic potential. We also find multiple continua of local minima corresponding to marginally bound states of the constituent D-branes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pure D-brane Black Holes: BPS Counting and non-BPS Vacua

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    The (1,1,1,5) and (1,1,1,6) D2-D2-D2-D6 BPS systems yield 2032 and 5616 vacua, matching U-duality, while the analogous non-BPS system has no zero-energy vacua and six doubly-degenerate low-energy minima.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 55 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    D. N. Page,Thermodynamics of near extreme black holes, 9, 2000. hep-th/0012020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    Chang, L

    C.-M. Chang, L. Feng, Y.-H. Lin and Y.-X. Tao,Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes, 2306.04673

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Banerjee, T

    N. Banerjee, T. Mandal, A. Rudra and M. Saha,Equivalence of JT gravity and near-extremal black hole dynamics in higher derivative theory, JHEP01(2022) 124 , [2110.04272]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Banerjee and M

    N. Banerjee and M. Saha,Revisiting leading quantum corrections to near extremal black hole thermodynamics, JHEP07(2023) 010 , [2303.12415]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Mishra and A

    M. Mishra and A. Virmani,Thermodynamics of BPS and near-BPS AdS 6 black holes, JHEP 06(2022) 087 , [2203.05279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Boruch, M

    J. Boruch, M. T. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci,BPS and near-BPS black holes in AdS5 and their spectrum inN= 4SYM, 2203.01331

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Castro and E

    A. Castro and E. Verheijden,Near-AdS2 Spectroscopy: Classifying the Spectrum of Operators and Interactions in N=2 4D Supergravity, Universe7(2021) 475 , [2110.04208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Nayak, A

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R. M. Soni, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes, JHEP09(2018) 048 , [1802.09547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes, JHEP 05(2021) 145 , [2003.02860]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/

    A. Kitaev, “https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/.”

  11. [11]

    https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/

    A. Kitaev, “https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/.”

  12. [12]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 106002, [1604.07818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP2016(2016) 12C104 , [1606.01857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Engels¨ oy, T

    J. Engels¨ oy, T. G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP07(2016) 139 , [1606.03438]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten,Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory, JHEP10 (2017) 008, [1703.04612]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci and H. L. Verlinde,Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap, JHEP08(2017) 136 , [1705.08408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    H. T. Lam, T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics, JHEP11(2018) 182 , [1804.09834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Kitaev and S

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh,Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole, JHEP05 (2019) 198, [1808.07032]. – 12 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Yang,The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes, JHEP05(2019) 205, [1809.08647]

    Z. Yang,The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes, JHEP05(2019) 205, [1809.08647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral, 1903.11115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  21. [21]

    L. V. Iliesiu, S. S. Pufu, H. Verlinde and Y. Wang,An exact quantization of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP11(2019) 091 , [1905.02726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Choi and F

    S. Choi and F. Larsen,Effective Field Theory of Quantum Black Holes. 8, 2021. 2108.04028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Choi and F

    S. Choi and F. Larsen,AdS 2 Holography and Effective QFT, 2302.13917

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Ghosh, H

    A. Ghosh, H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci,A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories, JHEP05(2020) 104 , [1912.07654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Mondal,Statistical mechanics of exponentially many low lying states, SciPost Physics18 (Mar., 2025) , [2310.12264]

    S. Mondal,Statistical mechanics of exponentially many low lying states, SciPost Physics18 (Mar., 2025) , [2310.12264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Witten,Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl

    E. Witten,Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 335–350 , [hep-th/9510135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    Ortin,Extremality versus supersymmetry in stringy black holes, Phys

    T. Ortin,Extremality versus supersymmetry in stringy black holes, Phys. Lett. B422(1998) 93–100, [hep-th/9612142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  28. [28]

    Mondal,An extremal black hole with a unique ground state, 2411.11096

    S. Mondal,An extremal black hole with a unique ground state, 2411.11096

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104 , [hep-th/9601029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  30. [30]

    J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten,Black hole entropy in M theory, JHEP12 (1997) 002, [hep-th/9711053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    de Boer, F

    J. de Boer, F. Denef, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken,Black hole bound states in AdS(3) x S**2, JHEP11(2008) 050 , [0802.2257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    Chowdhury, R

    A. Chowdhury, R. S. Garavuso, S. Mondal and A. Sen,BPS State Counting in N=8 Supersymmetric String Theory for Pure D-brane Configurations, JHEP10(2014) 186 , [1405.0412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. A. Tseytlin,Entropy of near extremal black p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 475(1996) 164–178 , [hep-th/9604089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger,Counting states of near-extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.77(Sep, 1996) 2368–2371

    1996

  35. [35]

    J. C. Breckenridge, D. A. Lowe, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet, A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Macroscopic and microscopic entropy of near extremal spinning black holes, Phys. Lett. B381 (1996) 423–426, [hep-th/9603078]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    J. M. Maldacena,D-branes and near extremal black holes at low-energies, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 7645–7650, [hep-th/9611125]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  37. [37]

    G. T. Horowitz, J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,Nonextremal black hole microstates and U duality, Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 151–159 , [hep-th/9603109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    Sfetsos and K

    K. Sfetsos and K. Skenderis,Microscopic derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for nonextremal black holes, Nucl. Phys. B517(1998) 179–204 , [hep-th/9711138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [39]

    J. M. Maldacena,Probing near extremal black holes with D-branes, Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 3736–3741, [hep-th/9705053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    J. M. Maldacena,Statistical entropy of near extremal five-branes, Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 168–174, [hep-th/9605016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    G. T. Horowitz, D. A. Lowe and J. M. Maldacena,Statistical entropy of nonextremal four-dimensional black holes and U duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 430–433 , [hep-th/9603195]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Dabholkar,Microstates of nonsupersymmetric black holes, Phys

    A. Dabholkar,Microstates of nonsupersymmetric black holes, Phys. Lett. B402(1997) 53–58 , [hep-th/9702050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa and M. Kruczenski,Brane anti-brane systems at finite temperature and the entropy of black branes, JHEP09(2001) 011 , [hep-th/0106201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  44. [44]

    Cvetic and D

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm,Near BPS saturated rotating electrically charged black holes as string states, Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 449–464 , [hep-th/9605051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  45. [45]

    Cvetic and A

    M. Cvetic and A. A. Tseytlin,Sigma model of near extreme rotating black holes and their microstates, Nucl. Phys. B537(1999) 381–394 , [hep-th/9806141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  46. [46]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Decoupling limit, lens spaces and Taub - NUT: D = 4 black hole microscopics from D = 5 black holes, Nucl. Phys. B549(1999) 194–214 , [hep-th/9811107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  47. [47]

    S. R. Das,The Effectiveness of D-branes in the description of near extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3582–3590 , [hep-th/9703146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  48. [48]

    J.-G. Zhou, H. J. W. Muller-Kirsten, J. Q. Liang and F. Zimmerschied,M-branes, anti-M-branes and nonextremal black holes, Nucl. Phys. B487(1997) 155–173 , [hep-th/9611146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  49. [49]

    D. Shih, A. Strominger and X. Yin,Counting dyons in N=8 string theory, JHEP06(2006) 037, [hep-th/0506151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Chowdhury, R

    A. Chowdhury, R. S. Garavuso, S. Mondal and A. Sen,Do All BPS Black Hole Microstates Carry Zero Angular Momentum?, JHEP04(2016) 082 , [1511.06978]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Abadi, A

    M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro et al.,TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015

    2015

  52. [52]

    Goldstein,Viscous Liquids and the Glass Transition: A Potential Energy Barrier Picture, jcp51(nov, 1969) 3728–3739

    M. Goldstein,Viscous Liquids and the Glass Transition: A Potential Energy Barrier Picture, jcp51(nov, 1969) 3728–3739

    1969

  53. [53]

    F. H. Stillinger and T. A. Weber,Hidden structure in liquids, Phys. Rev. A25(Feb, 1982) 978–989. – 14 –

    1982

  54. [54]

    F. H. Stillinger,A topographic view of supercooled liquids and glass formation, Science267 (1995) 1935–1939

    1995

  55. [55]

    Coluzzi, A

    B. Coluzzi, A. Crisanti, E. Marinari, F. Ritort and A. Rocco,A new method to compute the configurational entropy in spin glasses, 2003

    2003

  56. [56]

    Wales,Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses

    D. Wales,Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses. Cambridge Molecular Science. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  57. [57]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, vol. 5 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, 3 ed., 1980

    1980

  58. [58]

    Kumar and S

    P. Kumar and S. Mondal,Non-trivial saddles in microscopic description of black holes, JHEP 07(2024) 123 , [2312.04643]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Fast scramblers, Journal of High Energy Physics2008(oct, 2008) 065

    2008

  60. [60]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye,Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.70(May, 1993) 3339–3342

    1993

  61. [61]

    Sen,Quantum Entropy Function from AdS(2)/CFT(1) Correspondence, Int

    A. Sen,Quantum Entropy Function from AdS(2)/CFT(1) Correspondence, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 4225–4244 , [0809.3304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Strominger,AdS 2 Quantum Gravity and String Theory,JHEP9901(1999) 007, [hep-th/9809027]

    A. Strominger,AdS 2 Quantum Gravity and String Theory,JHEP9901(1999) 007, [hep-th/9809027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    J. M. Maldacena, J. Michelson and A. Strominger,Anti-de Sitter fragmentation, JHEP02 (1999) 011, [hep-th/9812073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    Narayan,On the Dynamics of AdS 2,Phys

    K. Narayan,On the Dynamics of AdS 2,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 126004, [ 1210.3981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations I, Commun

    S. Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations I, Commun. Math. Phys.307(2011) 17–63 , [1110.2007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations II, Annales Henri Poincare12(2011) 1491–1538 , [1110.2009]

    S. Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations II, Annales Henri Poincare12(2011) 1491–1538 , [1110.2009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Aretakis,Horizon Instability of Extremal Black Holes, Adv

    S. Aretakis,Horizon Instability of Extremal Black Holes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.19(2015) 507–530, [1206.6598]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015