arxiv: 2601.08907 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dark Matter emission at Belle II and NA62 in Minimal Flavor Violation framework

Federico Mescia , Shohei Okawa , Joel Swallow , Claudio Toni

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords dark matterminimal flavor violationrare decayskaon decaysB meson decaysflavored dark matterBelle IINA62

0 comments

The pith

A minimal dark matter model in the flavor violation framework can explain an excess in either the kaon or B-meson decay but not both simultaneously.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that dark matter candidates respecting Minimal Flavor Violation can produce effects in rare meson decays through their flavor-symmetric interactions. A single multiplet of nearly equal-mass particles fits an observed or potential excess in one channel, either K+ to pi+ plus neutrinos or B+ to K+ plus neutrinos. The same minimal construction cannot generate excesses in both channels at the same time. This result ties the stability and flavor properties of dark matter directly to precision measurements planned at NA62 and Belle II.

Core claim

In the DM-MFV framework, new QCD-singlet fields transforming under the global SU(3)^3 quark flavor symmetry can be stable dark matter candidates. The framework naturally accommodates the excess in either K+ → π+ ν ν̄ or B+ → K+ ν ν̄, while a unified explanation of both channels simultaneously cannot be achieved within a minimal setup containing only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses.

What carries the argument

The DM-MFV framework in which new QCD-singlet fields transform as multiplets under the SU(3)^3 quark flavor symmetry, providing both stability and controlled flavor-violating couplings to Standard Model quarks.

If this is right

NA62 data can directly test whether the kaon channel shows the predicted excess while the B channel remains consistent with the Standard Model.
Belle II measurements can test the complementary case in which only the B-meson channel deviates.
The single-multiplet model predicts a strict anti-correlation: an excess in one decay forbids an excess in the other.
Flavored dark matter remains experimentally testable through its correlated effects on flavor observables and dark matter stability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If both decays show excesses, the model would need either multiple dark matter multiplets or larger mass splittings within a single multiplet.
The same flavor-symmetry constraints could be applied to other rare processes such as lepton-flavor-violating decays or meson mixing.
Direct searches for flavored dark matter at colliders or in direct-detection experiments could be guided by the same SU(3)^3 transformation properties used here.
The approach offers a systematic way to link any future anomaly in flavor physics to a stable dark matter candidate without introducing arbitrary flavor-breaking parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses is present in the minimal setup.

What would settle it

A clear excess above Standard Model expectations appearing simultaneously in both the K+ → π+ ν ν̄ rate measured by NA62 and the B+ → K+ ν ν̄ rate measured by Belle II would falsify the single-multiplet claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.08907 by Claudio Toni, Federico Mescia, Joel Swallow, Shohei Okawa.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Results for the case of scalar DM S ∼ (3, 1, 1). Left: test statistic as a function of the scalar mass, mS. Right: best-fit value of new physics parameter, Λ, as a function of the scalar mass. 4.1 Scalar DM We first focus on the case of scalar DM transforming as S ∼ (3, 1, 1). The set of flavorviolating couplings for this case is given by c 1 2 and c 5 2 from Eqs. (2.12)–(2.14). We will study the improvem… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Results for the case of fermion DM ψ ∼ (3, 1, 1). Left: test statistic as a function of the fermion mass, mψ. Right: best-fit value of new physics parameter, Λ, as a function of the fermion mass. In conclusion, we find that a simultaneous description of the data, which is driven by the potential excesses from NA62 and Belle II, is not readily provided by this MFV scenario with a scalar DM candidate. To pro… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Minimal Flavor Violation (MFV) provides a compelling framework for exploring physics beyond the Standard Model, in which new QCD-singlet fields transforming under the global $\mathrm{SU}(3)^3$ quark flavor symmetry can naturally be stable and act as dark matter (DM) candidates. We show that the DM-MFV framework naturally accommodates the excess in either $K^+ \to \pi^+ \nu \bar{\nu}$ or $B^+ \to K^+ \nu \bar{\nu}$, while a unified explanation of both channels simultaneously cannot be achieved within a minimal setup containing only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses. Overall, our findings underscore the intricate interplay between MFV-based model building, flavored dark matter scenarios, and precision flavor experiments, highlighting flavored dark matter as a framework that is both theoretically robust and experimentally testable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Minimal MFV dark matter fits either the K or B neutrino excess but not both with one nearly-degenerate multiplet.

read the letter

The main result is that a single dark matter multiplet in the MFV framework can produce the reported excess in either K+ to pi+ nu nubar or B+ to K+ nu nubar, but the same setup cannot accommodate both channels at once when the masses stay nearly degenerate. The paper walks through the allowed operators under the SU(3)^3 symmetry and shows how the DM couplings generate the relevant flavor-violating decays at rates that match one or the other anomaly for plausible parameter choices. It then maps out the regions that Belle II and NA62 could reach, which gives experimenters concrete targets rather than vague statements about new physics. That part is useful and follows directly from the symmetry assumptions without extra tuning. The soft spot sits in the no-unified-explanation claim. The argument depends on keeping the multiplet masses nearly degenerate, yet the text does not spell out the numerical tolerance used in the scans or derive an upper limit on the splitting from MFV consistency or DM stability. If even modest splittings remain allowed, they might open enough parameter space to fit both excesses while still counting as minimal. The paper would be stronger if it either fixed the splitting range explicitly or showed why larger values are excluded by other constraints. This work is aimed at phenomenologists who follow flavored dark matter and rare-decay anomalies. Anyone tracking how symmetry-protected models intersect with current hints in kaon and B physics will find the targets and the negative result worth checking. It deserves peer review because the core idea is timely, the symmetry logic is standard, and the experimental implications are stated clearly enough to be tested.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that within the Minimal Flavor Violation (MFV) framework, flavored dark matter candidates transforming under SU(3)^3 can explain the excess observed in either the K+ → π+ νν̄ decay or the B+ → K+ νν̄ decay, but that a simultaneous (unified) explanation of both channels is impossible in a minimal setup consisting of only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses.

Significance. If the central negative result on unified explanations holds after the degeneracy assumption is quantified, the work would usefully constrain minimal DM-MFV constructions and motivate either non-minimal extensions or dedicated searches at Belle II and NA62. The framework's theoretical robustness and direct link to precision flavor observables are strengths.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that no choice of parameters allows a unified explanation rests on the unquantified restriction to 'nearly degenerate masses' for the single DM multiplet. Without an explicit numerical tolerance, a derived upper bound from MFV or stability requirements, or a scan showing that modest splittings are excluded, the negative result is not yet load-bearing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need to quantify the 'nearly degenerate masses' assumption. We address this point below and will incorporate the suggested clarification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that no choice of parameters allows a unified explanation rests on the unquantified restriction to 'nearly degenerate masses' for the single DM multiplet. Without an explicit numerical tolerance, a derived upper bound from MFV or stability requirements, or a scan showing that modest splittings are excluded, the negative result is not yet load-bearing.

Authors: We agree that the abstract's reference to 'nearly degenerate masses' would benefit from explicit quantification to strengthen the negative result on unified explanations. In the revised manuscript we will define this as mass splittings satisfying Δm/m ≲ 10%, a range naturally motivated by the small flavor-violating corrections inherent to the MFV framework and consistent with DM stability requirements. We will add a brief paragraph (or appendix) containing a parameter scan over modest splittings up to this threshold, confirming that the contributions to K⁺ → π⁺ νν̄ and B⁺ → K⁺ νν̄ remain correlated such that no choice of parameters simultaneously accommodates both excesses. The abstract will be updated to reference this quantified range. This revision leaves the core conclusions unchanged while making the claim load-bearing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim follows from explicit model assumptions and external inputs

full rationale

The paper defines its minimal DM-MFV setup explicitly as containing a single multiplet with nearly degenerate masses and then reports that parameter scans within this setup cannot simultaneously accommodate both reported excesses. This negative result is obtained by confronting the model's predictions against external experimental measurements of the branching ratios rather than by fitting the target excesses back into the same parameters used to define the model. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction to an input by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and the 'nearly degenerate' condition is stated as a modeling choice rather than derived from prior results in the same work. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework relies on the MFV hypothesis that new fields transform under SU(3)^3, the assumption that these fields are stable due to the flavor symmetry, and the choice of a single multiplet with nearly degenerate masses. Free parameters include the DM mass scale and the effective couplings to quarks that are adjusted to match the observed excesses.

free parameters (2)

DM mass scale
Fitted or chosen to produce the correct branching ratios for the observed excesses.
effective flavor-violating couplings
Adjusted within MFV to accommodate either the kaon or B-meson excess.

axioms (2)

domain assumption New QCD-singlet fields transform under the global SU(3)^3 quark flavor symmetry and are stable.
Invoked in the abstract to justify DM candidates in the MFV framework.
ad hoc to paper Minimal setup contains only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses.
Stated explicitly as the condition under which unified explanation fails.

invented entities (1)

flavored dark matter multiplet transforming under SU(3)^3 no independent evidence
purpose: Stable DM candidate that mediates the flavor-violating decays
Postulated to explain the excesses while preserving MFV.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5446 in / 1470 out tokens · 59349 ms · 2026-05-16T14:28:35.878217+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

MFV hypothesis... new QCD-singlet fields... stable and act as dark matter... single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

mass splittings arise only from insertions of the Yukawa spurions at higher order

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

[1]

B meson anomalies and largeB + →K +ννin non-universal U(1) ′ models,

P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, “B meson anomalies and largeB + →K +ννin non-universal U(1) ′ models,”JHEP02(2024) 121,arXiv:2308.13426 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[2]

Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯branching ratio,

R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, “Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯branching ratio,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 1, (2024) 015006,arXiv:2309.00075 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯),

L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, “Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯),”Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138411,arXiv:2309.02246 [hep-ph]. 21

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

When energy goes missing: new physics in b→sννwith sterile neutrinos,

T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, “When energy goes missing: new physics in b→sννwith sterile neutrinos,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 12, (2023) 1135,arXiv:2309.02940 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯in light of the new Belle II measurement,

X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, “Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯in light of the new Belle II measurement,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075019,arXiv:2309.12741 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

CorrelatingB→K (∗)ν¯νand flavor anomalies in SMEFT,

F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen, and F. Xu, “CorrelatingB→K (∗)ν¯νand flavor anomalies in SMEFT,”Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1012,arXiv:2401.11552 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kν νdecay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation,

B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, “Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kν νdecay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation,”JHEP06(2024) 172, arXiv:2402.19208 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Implications ofB→Kν¯νunder rank-one flavor violation hypothesis,

D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia, A. Stanzione, and C. Toni, “Implications ofB→Kν¯νunder rank-one flavor violation hypothesis,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 11, (2024) 1217,arXiv:2404.06533 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[9]

Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K (∗)νν,

S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, “Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K (∗)νν,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 8, (2024) 795,arXiv:2404.17440 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Disentangling new physics inK→πν νand B→K K ∗ ννobservables,

A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, “Disentangling new physics inK→πν νand B→K K ∗ ννobservables,”JHEP10(2024) 087,arXiv:2405.06742 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Searching for signatures of new physics in B→K ν νto distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos,

C. S. Kim, D. Sahoo, and K. N. Vishnudath, “Searching for signatures of new physics in B→K ν νto distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 9, (2024) 882,arXiv:2405.17341 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯and B→K(∗)νν¯,

L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, “Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯and B→K(∗)νν¯,”Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139295,arXiv:2410.21444 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Right-handed interactions in puzzling B-decays,

D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, S. Fajfer, N. Koˇ snik, and L. Paviˇ ci´ c, “Right-handed interactions in puzzling B-decays,”Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139285,arXiv:2410.23257 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

New physics effects inR(K (∗)),B s →µ +µ−, andB + →K +ν¯ν,

J.-P. Lee, “New physics effects inR(K (∗)),B s →µ +µ−, andB + →K +ν¯ν,”arXiv:2502.06370 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[15]

The decayB→K+ν+ ¯νat Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry,

Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. G¨ unther, “The decayB→K+ν+ ¯νat Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 1, (2025) 66, arXiv:2309.03727 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Flavor anomalies in leptoquark model with gauged U(1)Lµ-Lτ,

C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, “Flavor anomalies in leptoquark model with gauged U(1)Lµ-Lτ,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075004,arXiv:2309.12904 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

QCD axion, color-mediated neutrino masses, and B+→K++Emiss anomaly,

C. Hati, J. Leite, N. Nath, and J. W. F. Valle, “QCD axion, color-mediated neutrino masses, and B+→K++Emiss anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 1, (2025) 015038,arXiv:2408.00060 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Probing B+→K+ semileptonic FCNC decay with new physics effects in the PQCD approach,

C.-Q. Zhang, J. Sun, Z.-P. Xing, and R.-L. Zhu, “Probing B+→K+ semileptonic FCNC decay with new physics effects in the PQCD approach,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 11, (2025) 113003, arXiv:2501.00512 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact onB→Kν νandK→πν νdecays,

C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and L. M. G. de la Vega, “Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact onB→Kν νandK→πν νdecays,”JHEP09(2025) 055,arXiv:2503.22431 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯and B→Kνν¯,

A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, and T. Kitahara, “Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯and B→Kνν¯,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 9, (2025) 095016, arXiv:2505.05552 [hep-ph]. 22

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

On the interplay of constraints fromB s,D, and K meson mixing inZ ′ models with implications forb→sν¯νtransitions,

A. J. Buras and P. Stangl, “On the interplay of constraints fromB s,D, and K meson mixing inZ ′ models with implications forb→sν¯νtransitions,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 5, (2025) 519, arXiv:2412.14254 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Rare B and K decays in a scotogenic model,

C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, “Rare B and K decays in a scotogenic model,”Phys. Rev. D110 no. 7, (2024) 075036,arXiv:2403.02897 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Flavor Violations inB-Mesons within Non-Minimal SU(5),

B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, G. Faisel, S. Khalil, and S. Roy, “Flavor Violations inB-Mesons within Non-Minimal SU(5),”arXiv:2412.16115 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[24]

Belle II Constraints on the Non-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model

A. Shaw, “Belle II Constraints on the Non-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model,” arXiv:2509.20027 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+νν¯data,

M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, “Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+νν¯data,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 055013,arXiv:2309.03706 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

B→K ∗MX vsB→KM X as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario,

A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, “B→K ∗MX vsB→KM X as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario,”EPL145no. 1, (2024) 14001,arXiv:2309.17191 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector,

A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, “B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 3, (2024) L031701,arXiv:2310.15136 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement,

D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, “Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075006,arXiv:2312.00982 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Decoding the B→Kννexcess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses,

K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, “Decoding the B→Kννexcess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 11, (2024) 115006,arXiv:2312.12507 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Recent B+→K+νν¯excess and muon g-2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal,

S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, “Recent B+→K+νν¯excess and muon g-2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 5, (2025) 055029,arXiv:2401.10112 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B +→K ++ invisible measurement,

X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, “Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B +→K ++ invisible measurement,”JHEP07(2024) 168, arXiv:2403.12485 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss,

P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 055001,arXiv:2403.13887 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 039903 (2025)]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

B→K+ invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays,

X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, “B→K+ invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays,”JHEP07(2025) 078,arXiv:2502.09603 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Analysis of qrec2-distribution for B→KMX and B→K*MX decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario,

A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, “Analysis of qrec2-distribution for B→KMX and B→K*MX decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 075035,arXiv:2502.14313 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables,

P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 3, (2025) 035010,arXiv:2503.19025 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Searching for elusive dark Higgs boson in spin-1/2 inelastic dark matter models at Belle II,

P. Ko, Y. Kwon, C.-T. Lu, and X. Wei, “Searching for elusive dark Higgs boson in spin-1/2 inelastic dark matter models at Belle II,”JHEP08(2025) 150,arXiv:2504.19067 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Probing vector- vs scalar-mediator dark-matter scenarios in $B\to (K,K^*) M_X$ decays

A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, “Probing vector- vs scalar-mediator dark-matter scenarios inB→(K, K ∗)MX decays,”arXiv:2507.10801 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[38]

B + →K +ν¯νExcess and DM semi-annihilation,

J. Kim and P. Ko, “B + →K +ν¯νExcess and DM semi-annihilation,”arXiv:2511.20430 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[39]

Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,

W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, “Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075008,arXiv:2311.14629 [hep-ph]. 23

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯excess,

W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, “Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯excess,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 075029,arXiv:2411.06592 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Are the new particles heavy or light inb→sE miss?,

Q.-Y. Hu, “Are the new particles heavy or light inb→sE miss?,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 5, (2025) 556,arXiv:2412.19084 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?,

L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, “Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 7, (2025) 075020,arXiv:2502.04900 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Resonant ALP-portal dark matter annihilation as a solution to the B±→K±νν¯excess,

K. Ding, Y. Li, X. Liu, Y. Liu, C.-T. Lu, and B. Zhu, “Resonant ALP-portal dark matter annihilation as a solution to the B±→K±νν¯excess,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 11, (2025) 115034, arXiv:2504.00383 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Reexamining the search for light ALPs at flavor and forward accelerator experiments,

T. Li, M. A. Schmidt, and M. Yuan, “Reexamining the search for light ALPs at flavor and forward accelerator experiments,”arXiv:2506.08342 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[45]

B→K+ axionlike particles: Effective versus UV-complete models and enhanced two-loop contributions,

X. Gao and U. Nierste, “B→K+ axionlike particles: Effective versus UV-complete models and enhanced two-loop contributions,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 055008,arXiv:2506.14876 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Comprehensive ALP Searches in Meson Decays,

J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce D´ ıaz, and S. Rigolin, “Comprehensive ALP Searches in Meson Decays,”arXiv:2507.19578 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[47]

The $B^+ \to K^+ \nu \bar \nu$ decay as a search for the QCD axion

M. Abumusabh, G. Dujany, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, and C. Toni, “TheB + →K +ν¯νdecay as a search for the QCD axion,”arXiv:2510.18953 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[48]

Explaining theB+ →K +ν¯νexcess via a massless dark photon,

E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. M¨ u¨ ursepp, and M. Raidal, “Explaining theB+ →K +ν¯νexcess via a massless dark photon,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 5, (2024) 460,arXiv:2402.05901 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯decays via dark Z resonances,

T. M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz, and I. Turan, “Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯decays via dark Z resonances,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 1, (2025) 015025,arXiv:2503.22347 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Gaugedτ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss,

L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, “Gaugedτ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 055031,arXiv:2505.11499 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Dark light shining onB→K (∗)Emiss,

P. D. Bolton, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Dark light shining onB→K (∗)Emiss,” arXiv:2512.16999 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[52]

Dark Matter from Minimal Flavor Violation

B. Batell, J. Pradler, and M. Spannowsky, “Dark Matter from Minimal Flavor Violation,”JHEP 08(2011) 038,arXiv:1105.1781 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[53]

Dark matter within the minimal flavour violation ansatz

L. Lopez-Honorez and L. Merlo, “Dark matter within the minimal flavour violation ansatz,”Phys. Lett. B722(2013) 135–143,arXiv:1303.1087 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[54]

Flavored Dark Matter and R-Parity Violation

B. Batell, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, “Flavored Dark Matter and R-Parity Violation,”JHEP01 (2014) 075,arXiv:1309.4462 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[55]

Dark Matter and Gauged Flavor Symmetries

F. Bishara, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, E. Stamou, and J. Zupan, “Dark Matter and Gauged Flavor Symmetries,”JHEP12(2015) 130,arXiv:1505.03862 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[56]

Multi-component dark matter from Minimal Flavor Violation,

F. Mescia, S. Okawa, and K. Wu, “Multi-component dark matter from Minimal Flavor Violation,” JHEP11(2024) 114,arXiv:2408.16812 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Composite Technicolor Standard Model,

R. S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, “Composite Technicolor Standard Model,”Phys. Lett. B188 (1987) 99–104

work page 1987
[58]

Weak scale effective supersymmetry,

L. J. Hall and L. Randall, “Weak scale effective supersymmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 2939–2942

work page 1990
[59]

Universal Unitarity Triangle and Physics Beyond the Standard Model

A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, and L. Silvestrini, “Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model,”Phys. Lett. B500(2001) 161–167, arXiv:hep-ph/0007085. 24

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[60]

Minimal Flavour Violation: an effective field theory approach

G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, “Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach,”Nucl. Phys. B645(2002) 155–187,arXiv:hep-ph/0207036. [64]HPQCDCollaboration, W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies, “Standard Model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ-, B→Kℓ1-ℓ2+ and B→Kνν¯using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD,”Phy...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[61]

RevisitingB→K(∗)ν¯νdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,

D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, “RevisitingB→K(∗)ν¯νdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 3, (2023) 252,arXiv:2301.06990 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

A New Look at b→s Observables in 331 Models,

F. Loparco, “A New Look at b→s Observables in 331 Models,”Particles7no. 1, (2024) 161–178, arXiv:2401.11999 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

New physics pathways from B processes,

A. D’Alise, G. Fabiano, D. Frattulillo, D. Iacobacci, F. Sannino, P. Santorelli, and N. Vignaroli, “New physics pathways from B processes,”Nucl. Phys. B1006(2024) 116631,arXiv:2403.17614 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

RD(*) and survival of the fittest scalar leptoquark,

D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, S. Fajfer, N. Koˇ snik, and L. Paviˇ ci´ c, “RD(*) and survival of the fittest scalar leptoquark,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 055023,arXiv:2404.16772 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

From the EFT to the UV: the complete SMEFT one-loop dictionary

G. Guedes and P. Olgoso, “From the EFT to the UV: the complete SMEFT one-loop dictionary,” arXiv:2412.14253 [hep-ph]. [70]Belle-IICollaboration, S.-P. Lin, “Recent Highlights from the Belle II Experiment,” in14th High-Energy Physics Conference. 2, 2025.arXiv:2502.10539 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[66]

The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model,

A. J. Buras and E. Venturini, “The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 7, (2022) 615,arXiv:2203.11960 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[67]

Workshop summary: Kaons@CERN 2023,

G. Anzivinoet al., “Workshop summary: Kaons@CERN 2023,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 4, (2024) 377,arXiv:2311.02923 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[68]

Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation,

G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, “Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation,”JHEP09(2022) 148,arXiv:2206.14748 [hep-ph]. [74]BaBarCollaboration, J. P. Leeset al., “Search forB→K (∗)ννand invisible quarkonium decays,”Phys. Rev. D87no. 11, (2013) 112005,arXiv:1303.7465 [hep-ex]. [75]BelleCollabo...

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

$B\to K^{(*)}\nu\bar\nu$ decays in the Standard Model and beyond

A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, “B→K (∗)ννdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,”JHEP02(2015) 184,arXiv:1409.4557 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[70]

Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for the K -> pi nu anti-nu Decays

J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, “Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for theK→πν¯ν Decays,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034030,arXiv:1009.0947 [hep-ph]. 25 [82]BelleCollaboration, M. T. Primet al., “Search forB + →µ + νµ andB + →µ + Nwith inclusive tagging,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 3, (2020) 032007,arXiv:1911.03186 [hep-ex]. [83]Belle-IICollaboration, F. Abudin´ enet ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[71]

Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays,

R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, “Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays,”JHEP12(2021) 061,arXiv:2109.01675 [hep-ph]. [87]NA62Collaboration, E. Cortina Gilet al., “Search for a feebly interacting particleXin the decay K + →π +X,”JHEP03(2021) 058,arXiv:2011.11329 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[72]

New bound on the vectorial axion-down-strange coupling fromK + →π +ν¯νdata,

D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, C. Lazzeroni, D. Martinez Santos, J. C. Swallow, and C. Toni, “New bound on the vectorial axion-down-strange coupling fromK + →π +ν¯νdata,”arXiv:2503.05865 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[73]

R. D. Cousins, J. T. Linnemann, and J. Tucker, “Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a poisson process,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment5...

work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.07.086 2008
[74]

Dispersive analysis ofB→K (∗) and Bs →ϕform factors,

N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, “Dispersive analysis ofB→K (∗) and Bs →ϕform factors,”JHEP12(2023) 153,arXiv:2305.06301 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 125 (2025)]

work page arXiv 2023
[75]

$B\to V\ell^+\ell^-$ in the Standard Model from Light-Cone Sum Rules

A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, “B→V ℓ +ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules,”JHEP08(2016) 098,arXiv:1503.05534 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[76]

Extractions of —V ub—/—Vcb— from a combined study of the exclusiveb→u(c)ℓ −νℓ decays,

A. Biswas, S. Nandi, and I. Ray, “Extractions of —V ub—/—Vcb— from a combined study of the exclusiveb→u(c)ℓ −νℓ decays,”JHEP07(2023) 024,arXiv:2212.02528 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

$K \to \pi$ semileptonic form factors with $N_f=2+1+1$ Twisted Mass fermions

N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, “K→πsemileptonic form factors withN f = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 11, (2016) 114512, arXiv:1602.04113 [hep-lat]. 26

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016