Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The paper claims that the stabilizer Rényi entropy of a thermofield double state evolving under a chaotic all-to-all Hamiltonian is fixed by the spectral form factor until it hits its upper bound, where a first-order dynamical transition sa

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 09:41 UTC pith:N5ECF2RR

load-bearing objection A new SRE–SFF relation with a real SYK demonstration, but the universality claim rests on an unproven typicality assumption; send to referees. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2601.12787 v1 pith:N5ECF2RR submitted 2026-01-19 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

Connecting Magic Dynamics in Thermofield Double States to Spectral Form Factors

Ning Sun , Pengfei Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.str-el PACS 05.45.Mt
keywords stabilizer Rényi entropyquantum magicnon-stabilizernessthermofield double statesspectral form factorSachdev-Ye-Kitaev modelZ2 symmetry breakingdynamical phase transition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish a direct, quantitative bridge between two diagnostics of quantum complexity that have so far lived separate lives: spectral chaos, captured by the spectral form factor, and non-stabilizerness ('magic'), captured by the stabilizer Rényi entropy. For thermofield double states in chaotic all-to-all systems it argues that magic growth is controlled by the spectral form factor, with the saturation of magic enforced by a first-order dynamical transition. Concretely, the stabilizer Rényi entropy equals the smaller of its maximal possible value and a function built from the SFF at half the inverse temperature; the naive SFF formula would exceed the bound, and a competing saddle with spontaneously broken Z2 symmetry restores it. In the SYK model the symmetric saddle realizes the SFF relation exactly in the slope regime while the symmetry-broken saddle gives maximal magic, with the transition time finite at high temperature and exponentially long at low temperature. This matters because it ties the emergence of classically hard-to-simulate states to the same spectral statistics that define quantum chaos, suggesting that SFF measurements can track magic dynamics.

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (7)-(8): for a TFD state at inverse temperature β, the fourth-moment sum defining the SRE is, up to exponentially small corrections, C0 2^{-N} + SFF_{β/2}(t)^4 / (2^{2N} Z(β)^4), so the SRE is M2(t) ≈ min{N ln2, M2^p(t)} with M2^p(t) = 2N ln2 - 4 ln(SFF_{β/2}(t)/Z(β)). The function M2^p grows during the slope regime of the SFF and would eventually exceed the upper bound N ln2; the minimum with N ln2 therefore cuts it off, producing a first-order dynamical transition. In the SYK model the transition is realized by two saddle points: the Z2-symmetric saddle, whose SRE equals the SFF expression exactly in the slope regime, and a Z2-breaking saddle that gives M2 ≈ N ln2,

What carries the argument

The auxiliary-spin representation of the stabilizer Rényi entropy: four replicas of the fermionic density matrix are twisted by fermionic SWAP operators, converting the sum over Majorana strings into a sum over 2N Ising variables σ_{L/R,j}. The resulting path integral has an emergent global Z2 symmetry. Under the symmetric saddle the replicated partition function factorizes into a product of two partition functions, giving the spectral form factor in its self-averaging slope regime; under the symmetry-broken saddle one spin orientation dominates, giving the maximal-magic plateau. The TFD state, built by imaginary-time evolving an EPR pair, is what makes the fourth moments of the Majorana spe

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for the overwhelming majority of Majorana strings, the time-dependent coefficients fluctuate around their mean in a typical Gaussian way with exponentially small variance, so that deviations only renormalize an O(1) constant; if that typicality fails, the SRE is not determined by the spectral form factor and the central relation collapses.

What would settle it

Exact-diagonalization calculation of the full stabilizer Rényi entropy for a thermofield double state in a finite but large SYK model (q=4, βJ ≈ 1): if M2(t)/N does not show a sharp kink at the time where the SFF-based expression M2^p(t) crosses N ln2, or if M2(t) ever exceeds N ln2, the proposed relation is false. Independently, sampling the coefficients c_{v,v}(t) over complex strings and measuring their variance would settle the typicality premise: it must scale as O(2^{-N}) for the SFF formula to be valid.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In chaotic all-to-all systems the time at which magic saturates is set by the slope-to-ramp crossover of the spectral form factor, not by microscopic details of the Hamiltonian.
  • The stabilizer Rényi entropy per site develops a singular kink at the transition time in the thermodynamic limit, a sharp signature that could be detected in simulations or experiments.
  • At low temperatures the saturation is pushed to exponentially long times because the Schwarzian soft mode stretches the slope regime, making magic and the spectral form factor slow in sync.
  • The same two-saddle mechanism should extend to generalizations of the SYK model with random all-to-all couplings and to higher-dimensional SYK variants.
  • The minimum in Eq. (8) resolves the apparent violation of the bound M2 ≤ N ln2, the magic analogue of an information paradox for the SFF formula.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the typicality assumption behind Eq. (6) holds in more general chaotic systems, one could read off magic growth from a spectral measurement alone, without preparing the state or simulating the operator sum.
  • The paper restricts its argument to all-to-all models; a natural extension would be to test whether a locality-modified version of the operator classification recovers the same SFF-magic relation in finite-range interacting chains.
  • The natural next probe is the monitored/unitary-projective setting: if the SRE-SFF link survives non-unitary dynamics, the transition studied here could be used as an order parameter for measurement-induced phase transitions.
  • A concrete finite-N test: exact diagonalization of SYK q=4 at βJ ≈ 1 should show M2/N rising along the SFF slope and then bending sharply at the crossing time; absence of the kink would falsify the mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general relation between the stabilizer Rényi entropy (SRE) of thermofield double (TFD) states and the spectral form factor (SFF) of chaotic all-to-all Hamiltonians. The central claim is Eq. (8): in the thermodynamic limit, M2(t) ≈ Min{N ln 2, 2N ln 2 − 4 ln[SFF_{β/2}(t)/Z(β)]}, implying a first-order dynamical transition when the SFF-slope expression would violate the upper bound. The argument starts from an exact v-average identity for the Majorana coefficients (Eq. (5)), then estimates the fourth moment of the Majorana spectrum by separating a v-averaged contribution from fluctuations (Eq. (6)), and finally uses the slope-ramp-plateau structure of the SFF. The authors support the relation in the SYK model using an auxiliary-spin path-integral representation, where a Z2-symmetric saddle reproduces the SFF slope and a Z2-breaking saddle gives the saturated SRE. They present a temperature–time phase diagram and argue that at low temperature the transition is delayed to exponentially long times by soft reparametrization modes.

Significance. If the general relation holds, it provides a rare quantitative bridge between non-stabilizerness growth and spectral chaos, with a sharp first-order transition as a concrete prediction. The SYK demonstration is a substantial strength: it avoids Haar-random averaging and the authors report that the symmetric saddle satisfies Eq. (7) to machine precision against an independent SFF computation. The emergent-Z2 mechanism and the symmetry-breaking saddle are compelling. However, the general argument rests on an unverified typicality assumption about the fourth moment of the Majorana coefficients, which is precisely the content of the SRE–SFF relation. As a result, the universal claim is currently conditional, although the SYK evidence makes it plausible.

major comments (2)
  1. [General argument, Eq. (6), and Supplement 'An estimation of the contribution from operators with vL ≠ vR'] The passage from Eq. (5) to Eq. (6) assumes that the O(4^N) coefficients c_{vL,vR}(t) fluctuate around their mean in a Gaussian, Haar-typical way. The Supplement's normalization argument fixes only the second moment (σ ≲ 2^{-N}); it does not control the fourth moment that actually enters the SRE. For example, a sparse set of only 2^{N/2} coefficients with |c| ∼ O(1) would satisfy the overall normalization yet contribute 2^{-N/2} to the normalized fourth-moment sum, swamping the 2^{-N} terms in Eq. (6) and shifting the would-be transition time by O(N). The Gaussian/typicality premise is plausible for Haar-random states, but the time-evolved TFD state is least obviously Haar-typical in the early-time slope regime where Eq. (8) is used. No exact-diagonalization check of Eq. (6) or of the kurtosis is reported. Since this step is load-bearing for the central relation, I request either a contr
  2. [SYK low-temperature regime and Eq. (19)] The claim that at low temperature the transition occurs at exponentially long times relies on the Schwarzian continuation in Eq. (19): the last, O(1) logarithmic term becomes O(N) only when t ∼ e^N. The numerical saddle-point solutions in Fig. 2 do not access this regime, and the indicated fit M2/N = a0 + b0/(c0 + J²t²) is a multi-parameter extrapolation. The argument is plausible, especially with the qV = 2 versus qV = 6 supplement, but as presented the exponential-time prediction is a conjecture based on the Schwarzian partition function rather than a controlled saddle-point computation of the SRE in that regime. Please either state this status explicitly or provide a computation of the free-energy difference at t ∼ e^N.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The normalization factor 2^{v_t/2} appears inconsistent with the standard Majorana-string convention, where Hermitian strings squared to unity carry only the phase i^{v_t(v_t−1)/2}. Please check and clarify the normalization used in Eq. (2) and in the trace identities that follow.
  2. [General text near Eq. (12)] Typo: 'plays an central role' should be 'plays a central role'.
  3. [Supplement, 'SYK2 or SYK6 perturbations'] Typo: 'senarios' should be 'scenarios'.
  4. [Fig. 2(d) and main-text fitting] The fitting parameters a0, b0, c0 are used both for M2/N in the main text and for the phase boundary βJ = a0 + b0/(c0 + J²t²*) in Fig. 2(d). Rename one set to avoid confusion.
  5. [SYK symmetric-saddle check] The statement that the symmetric solution satisfies Eq. (7) 'to machine precision' should specify how the independent SFF was computed (saddle-point evaluation, exact diagonalization, or analytic expression) and over which time window this was verified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Eq. (8) rests on an averaged identity plus an independently computed SYK saddle-point check, not on a fitted or self-referential input.

full rationale

Every load-bearing step is either an algebraic identity or a separately verified computation. Eq. (4) is an exact rewriting of the Majorana-spectrum components, and Eq. (5) is the v-average of this identity, so the SFF appears as a computed average rather than as a quantity fitted to M2. Eqs. (6) and (8) then use an explicitly stated typicality/Gaussian-fluctuation estimate from the Supplement; that is a substantive physical assumption, but it is not a circular reduction, because the fourth-moment estimate is not obtained from the SRE it is later used to predict. In the SYK section, the auxiliary-spin representation of Ref. [39] is re-derived in the Supplement, so that self-citation is not load-bearing. The symmetric saddle is shown to give ZSRE proportional to \tilde Z^4 with \tilde Z = SFF in the slope regime, and the authors state it was 'numerically verified that the symmetric solution satisfies Eq. (7) to machine precision' against an independently computed SFF. The symmetry-breaking saddle independently produces the N ln 2 saturation, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely from the authors' prior work. The remaining concern about Haar-typicality/kurtosis is a correctness and falsifiability risk, not a circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SYK/large-N machinery and a typicality assumption about the Majorana spectrum. No fundamentally new entity is postulated: the auxiliary Ising spins are a computational representation from prior work, and the Z2 symmetry is emergent from that representation. The main unaccounted freedom is C0 and the empirical fit parameters used to locate the transition.

free parameters (2)
  • C0 = O(1), unspecified
    Introduced in Eq. (6) to absorb contributions from simple operators and fluctuations of c_{vL,vR}; the sharpness of the min formula and the exact transition time depend on C0 being O(1) and not exponentially large.
  • a0, b0, c0 in numerical fits = not stated explicitly
    Used to fit the SSB saddle magic (M2/N = ln 2 - a0 e^{-b0 Jt}), the symmetric-saddle magic (M2/N = a0 + b0/(c0+J^2 t^2)), and the phase boundary βJ = a0 + b0/(c0+J^2 t_*^2) in Fig. 2. These are empirical fit parameters, not derived from the theory.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Majorana spectrum of typical complex operators is Haar-typical/Gaussian, with variance at most O(2^{-N}).
    Used in the Supplement (Eqs. 1-2) to argue that fluctuations and vL≠vR contributions only renormalize C0. If violated, Eq. (6) fails.
  • domain assumption Chaotic all-to-all Hamiltonians have a self-averaged SFF with a slope regime dominated by the disconnected solution.
    Needed for Eqs. (5)-(7) and for Eq. (17), where the SRE saddle is identified with the slope part of the SFF.
  • domain assumption The SYK large-N saddle-point path integral allows the replica-diagonal ansatz G[αγ]=δαγG and only σL=σR contributions.
    Used in Supplementary Eqs. (12)-(17) and main Eq. (14), following Kitaev-Suh [86]. Without it the simple Z2 picture breaks down.
  • domain assumption Low-temperature SYK dynamics are governed by the Schwarzian reparametrization mode with exact partition function Zsch.
    Used to obtain Eq. (19) and the claim of exponentially long transition times. This is standard SYK lore but is an external input, not derived here.
  • domain assumption The operator classification (small, near-maximal, complex) neglects locality and is valid only for all-to-all interactions.
    Acknowledged in footnote [80]; the general argument is therefore not valid for local Hamiltonians.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33503 in / 21467 out tokens · 219474 ms · 2026-08-03T09:41:50.303979+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Under unitary evolution, chaotic quantum systems initialized in simple states rapidly develop high complexity, precluding any efficient classical description. Quantum chaos is traditionally characterized by spectral properties of the Hamiltonian, most notably through the spectral form factor, while the hardness of classical simulation within the stabilizer formalism, commonly referred to as quantum magic, can be quantified by the stabilizer R\'enyi entropy. In this Letter, we propose a relation between the dynamics of the stabilizer R\'enyi entropy for thermofield double states and the spectral form factor, based on general arguments for chaotic systems with all-to-all interactions. This relation implies that the saturation of the stabilizer R\'enyi entropy is governed by a first-order dynamical transition. We then demonstrate this relation explicitly in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, using an auxiliary-spin representation of the stabilizer R\'enyi entropy that exhibits an emergent $Z_2$ symmetry. We further find that, in the high-temperature regime of the SYK model, the transition occurs at a finite time, with the long-time phase marked by spontaneous $Z_2$ symmetry breaking. In contrast, at low temperatures, the transition is pushed to times exponentially long in the system size. Our results reveal an intriguing interplay between quantum chaos and quantum magic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.12787 by Ning Sun, Pengfei Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. An illustration of two independent approaches to re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical results for the SRE in the SYK model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Computational Resources and Conformal Field Theory: Unifying Spins, Bosons, and Fermions

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    A unified Magic Rényi Entropy measure for spins, bosons, and fermions is shown to have a universal critical contribution determined by the Affleck-Ludwig boundary entropy.

  2. Tuning quantum magic of pure quantum chaotic states with a gravity dual

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the large-N limit of the SYK model, quantum magic of pure KM states dual to black holes is linear in N with a temperature-tunable slope between 0 and 1/2.

  3. Non-stabilizerness and U(1) symmetry in chaotic many-body quantum systems

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact results show U(1) symmetry substantially suppresses non-stabilizerness in random states, with different leading scaling from entanglement near zero charge density.

  4. Quantum magic is necessary but not sufficient for wormhole-inspired teleportation

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical study of SRE in SYK WITP shows structured magic redistribution is required for teleportation fidelity while total magic alone is insufficient, with a transient dip at the fidelity peak.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 55 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  2. [2]

    Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, APS Physics 1, 538 (2019), arXiv:1812.04011 [cond- mat.str-el]

    R. Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, APS Physics 1, 538 (2019), arXiv:1812.04011 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052

    D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  5. [5]

    Gottesman, The Heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers, in 22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics(1998) pp

    D. Gottesman, The Heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers, in 22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics(1998) pp. 32–43, arXiv:quant-ph/9807006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation, Phys

    D. Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation, Phys. Rev. A 57, 127 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022), arXiv:2106.12587 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and non- stabilizerness monotones, Quantum 7, 1092 (2023), arXiv:2303.10152 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Wang and Y

    Y. Wang and Y. Li, Stabilizer R´ enyi entropy on qudits, Quant. Inf. Proc. 22, 444 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Huang, H.-Z

    X. Huang, H.-Z. Li, and J.-X. Zhong, A fast and exact algorithm for stabilizer R´ enyi entropy via XOR-FWHT, (2025), arXiv:2512.24685 [quant-ph]. 6

    arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Xiao and S

    Z. Xiao and S. Ryu, Exponentially Accelerated Sam- pling of Pauli Strings for Nonstabilizerness, (2026), arXiv:2601.00761 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a Re- source Theory for Magic States to Fault-Tolerant Quan- tum Computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 090501 (2017), arXiv:1609.07488 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Liu and A

    Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-Body Quantum Magic, PRX Quantum 3, 020333 (2022), arXiv:2010.13817 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Beverland, E

    M. Beverland, E. Campbell, M. Howard, and V. Kli- uchnikov, Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035009 (2020), arXiv:1904.01124 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Tirrito, P

    E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entan- glement spectrum flatness, Phys. Rev. A 109, L040401 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Turkeshi, M

    X. Turkeshi, M. Schir` o, and P. Sierant, Measuring non- stabilizerness via multifractal flatness, Phys. Rev. A108, 042408 (2023), arXiv:2305.11797 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Paviglianiti, G

    A. Paviglianiti, G. Lami, M. Collura, and A. Silva, Es- timating nonstabilizerness dynamics without simulating it, PRX Quantum 6, 030320 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Ahmadi and E

    A. Ahmadi and E. Greplova, Quantifying non- stabilizerness via information scrambling, SciPost Phys. 16, 043 (2024), arXiv:2204.11236 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Qian and J

    D. Qian and J. Wang, Quantum nonlocal nonstabilizer- ness, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052443 (2025), arXiv:2502.06393 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    C. D. White, C. Cao, and B. Swingle, Conformal field theories are magical, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075145 (2021), arXiv:2007.01303 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Smith, Z

    R. Smith, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Hallam, Nonstabilizerness in kinetically constrained Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245148 (2025), arXiv:2406.14348 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Bera and M

    S. Bera and M. Schir` o, Non-Stabilizerness of Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev Model, (2025), arXiv:2502.01582 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Jasser, J

    B. Jasser, J. Odavic, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer Entropy and entanglement complexity in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, (2025), arXiv:2502.03093 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Russomanno, G

    A. Russomanno, G. Passarelli, D. Rossini, and P. Lu- cignano, Nonstabilizerness in the unitary and monitored quantum dynamics of xxz-staggered and sachdev-ye- kitaev models, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064312 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Malvimat, M

    V. Malvimat, M. Sarkis, Y. Suk, and J. Yoon, Mul- tipartite Non-local Magic and SYK Model, (2026), arXiv:2601.03076 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Odavi´ c, M

    J. Odavi´ c, M. Viscardi, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer en- tropy in nonintegrable quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104301 (2025), arXiv:2412.10228 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Passarelli, R

    G. Passarelli, R. Fazio, and P. Lucignano, Nonstabilizer- ness of permutationally invariant systems, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022436 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    P. S. Tarabunga and C. Castelnovo, Magic in general- ized Rokhsar-Kivelson wavefunctions, Quantum 8, 1347 (2024), arXiv:2311.08463 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum 8, 1413 (2024), arXiv:2309.00676 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    A. G. Catalano, J. Odavi´ c, G. Torre, A. Hamma, F. Fran- chini, and S. M. Giampaolo, Magic phase transition and non-local complexity in generalized W State, (2024), arXiv:2406.19457 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Viscardi, M

    M. Viscardi, M. Dalmonte, A. Hamma, and E. Tirrito, In- terplay of entanglement structures and stabilizer entropy in spin models, (2025), arXiv:2503.08620 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang, and Z. Yan, Evaluating Many- Body Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy by Sampling Re- duced Pauli Strings: Singularities, Volume Law, and Nonlocal Magic, PRX Quantum 6, 030328 (2025), arXiv:2501.12146 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dal- monte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains—from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quantum 4, 040317 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    S. F. E. Oliviero, L. Leone, and A. Hamma, Magic-state resource theory for the ground state of the transverse- field Ising model, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042426 (2022), arXiv:2205.02247 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Collura, J

    M. Collura, J. De Nardis, V. Alba, and G. Lami, The quantum magic of fermionic Gaussian states, (2024), arXiv:2412.05367 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Wang, Z.-C

    C. Wang, Z.-C. Yang, T. Zhou, and X. Chen, Magic transition in monitored free fermion dynamics, (2025), arXiv:2507.10688 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Li, Y.-R

    H.-Z. Li, Y.-R. Zhang, Y.-J. Zhao, X. Huang, and J.-X. Zhong, Nonstabilizerness in Stark many-body localiza- tion, (2025), arXiv:2512.16859 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Lami and M

    G. Lami and M. Collura, Nonstabilizerness via Perfect Pauli Sampling of Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 180401 (2023), arXiv:2303.05536 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [41]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Quantifying nonstabilizerness of matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035148 (2023)

    2023

  41. [42]

    Lami and M

    G. Lami and M. Collura, Unveiling the stabilizer group of a matrix product state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 010602 (2024)

    2024

  42. [43]

    P. S. Tarabunga and T. Haug, Efficient mutual magic and magic capacity with matrix product states, (2025), arXiv:2504.07230 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [45]

    Zhang and Y

    Y. Zhang and Y. Gu, Quantum magic dynamics in ran- dom circuits, (2024), arXiv:2410.21128 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [46]

    Turkeshi, E

    X. Turkeshi, E. Tirrito, and P. Sierant, Magic spreading in random quantum circuits, Nature Commun. 16, 2575 (2025), arXiv:2407.03929 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [47]

    Tirrito, X

    E. Tirrito, X. Turkeshi, and P. Sierant, Anticoncentration and magic spreading under ergodic quantum dynamics, (2024), arXiv:2412.10229 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [48]

    T. Haug, L. Aolita, and M. S. Kim, Probing quan- tum complexity via universal saturation of stabilizer entropies, Quantum 9, 1801 (2025), arXiv:2406.04190 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [49]

    Szombathy, A

    D. Szombathy, A. Valli, C. P. Moca, J. Asb´ oth, L. Farkas, T. Rakovszky, and G. Zar´ and, Spectral Properties Versus Magic Generation in T -doped Random Clifford Circuits, (2024), arXiv:2412.15912 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [50]

    Szombathy, A

    D. Szombathy, A. Valli, C. P. Moca, L. Farkas, and G. Zar´ and, Independent stabilizer R´ enyi entropy and entanglement fluctuations in random unitary circuits, (2025), arXiv:2501.11489 [quant-ph]. 7

    arXiv 2025

  49. [51]

    Z.-Y. Hou, C. Cao, and Z.-C. Yang, Stabilizer Entanglement Enhances Magic Injection, (2025), arXiv:2503.20873 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [52]

    M. L. Mehta, Random matrices, Vol. 142 (Elsevier, 2004)

    2004

  51. [53]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, Black Holes and Random Matrices, JHEP05, 118, [Erratum: JHEP 09, 002 (2018)], arXiv:1611.04650 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [54]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, (2018), arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [55]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    2046

  54. [56]

    Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 32, 1163 (1999), arXiv:cond- mat/9809360 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 32, 1163 (1999), arXiv:cond- mat/9809360 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 1999

  55. [57]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum sys- tems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008), arXiv:0708.1324 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [58]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quan- tum thermalization through entanglement in an iso- lated many-body system, Science 353, aaf6725 (2016), arXiv:1603.04409 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [59]

    Khramtsov and E

    M. Khramtsov and E. Lanina, Spectral form fac- tor in the double-scaled SYK model, JHEP 03, 031, arXiv:2011.01906 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [60]

    Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys

    W. Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. A 57, 107 (1976)

    1976

  59. [61]

    J. M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04, 021, arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [62]

    Z. Liu, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Zhou, and P. Zhang, Di- agnosing strong-to-weak symmetry breaking via Wight- man correlators, Commun. Phys. 8, 274 (2025), arXiv:2410.09327 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [63]

    Weinstein, Efficient Detection of Strong-To-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the R´ enyi-1 Correlator, Phys

    Z. Weinstein, Efficient Detection of Strong-To-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the R´ enyi-1 Correlator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 150405 (2025), arXiv:2410.23512 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [64]

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and A. C. Wall, Traversable Worm- holes via a Double Trace Deformation, JHEP 12, 151, arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [65]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes, Fortsch. Phys. 65, 1700034 (2017), arXiv:1704.05333 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [66]

    Susskind and Y

    L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, Teleportation through the wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 98, 046016 (2018), arXiv:1707.04354 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [67]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu, Regenesis and quantum traversable wormholes, JHEP 10, 048, arXiv:1810.01444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [68]

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, S. Leichenauer, H. W. Lin, S. Nezami, G. Salton, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and M. Walter, Quantum Gravity in the Lab. I. Teleporta- tion by Size and Traversable Wormholes, PRX Quantum 4, 010320 (2023), arXiv:1911.06314 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [69]

    Gao and D

    P. Gao and D. L. Jafferis, A traversable wormhole tele- portation protocol in the SYK model, JHEP 07, 097, arXiv:1911.07416 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  68. [70]

    Schuster, B

    T. Schuster, B. Kobrin, P. Gao, I. Cong, E. T. Khabi- boulline, N. M. Linke, M. D. Lukin, C. Monroe, B. Yoshida, and N. Y. Yao, Many-Body Quantum Tele- portation via Operator Spreading in the Traversable Wormhole Protocol, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031013 (2022), arXiv:2102.00010 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  69. [71]

    Jafferis, A

    D. Jafferis, A. Zlokapa, J. D. Lykken, D. K. Kolch- meyer, S. I. Davis, N. Lauk, H. Neven, and M. Spiropulu, Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum proces- sor, Nature 612, 51 (2022), [Erratum: Nature 640, E32 (2025)]

    2022

  70. [72]

    S. Zhou, P. Zhang, and Z. Yu, Environment-induced Transitions in Many-body Quantum Teleportation, (2024), arXiv:2406.02277 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [73]

    Liu and P

    Z. Liu and P. Zhang, Fidelity of wormhole teleportation in finite-qubit systems, JHEP 07, 031, arXiv:2403.16793 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [74]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  73. [75]

    Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize sym- posium (2014)

    A. Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize sym- posium (2014)

    2014

  74. [77]

    Chowdhury, A

    D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Sachdev-ye-kitaev models and beyond: Window into non-fermi liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035004 (2022)

    2022

  75. [79]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  76. [80]

    This simple classification neglects the locality structure of the model and is therefore expected to be valid for systems with all-to-all interactions

  77. [81]

    See the Supplementary Material for (1) an estimate of the contribution from operators with vL ̸= vR, (2) a review of the representation of the SRE with auxiliary Ising spins, and (3) the derivation of the self-consistent equation for the SRE in the SYK model, (4) numerical results with SYK 2 or SYK6 perturbations

  78. [82]

    S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravita- tional collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976)

    1976

  79. [83]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. Maldacena, Islands out- side the horizon, (2019), arXiv:1910.11077 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [84]

    Chen, X.-L

    Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi, and P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Ma- jorana chains, JHEP 06, 121, arXiv:2003.13147 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.