pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.12789 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: no theorem link

Classical Be Stars and Classical Be Star Binaries from LAMOST DR12

Qian-Yu An , Wei-Min Gu , Zhi-Xiang Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords classical Be starsLAMOSTBe star binariesradial velocitystellar spectroscopyrunaway starsdecretion disks
0
0 comments X

The pith

LAMOST DR12 data yields 504 classical Be stars, 141 of them new, plus 14 binaries detected via radial velocity shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper catalogs 504 classical Be stars from LAMOST DR12 spectra, with 141 reported for the first time. Fourteen of the stars show radial velocity variations interpreted as evidence for binary companions. Sixty additional candidates are flagged by high RUWE values, 34 appear to be cluster members, and 37 are classified as runaways with peculiar velocities between 40 and 101 km/s. The work adds to the small sample of known CBe binaries outside the Be/X-ray class and supplies new targets for testing the mass-transfer formation channel.

Core claim

Using LAMOST DR12 spectra, the authors identify 504 classical Be stars by the presence of Balmer emission lines produced in decretion disks; 141 are previously unknown, 14 exhibit radial velocity variations indicating binarity, 60 more are proposed as binaries on the basis of high RUWE, 34 are probable cluster members, and 37 are runaways with peculiar velocities of 40-101 km/s.

What carries the argument

Balmer emission-line detection combined with radial-velocity variation monitoring to confirm decretion disks and binary status.

If this is right

  • The enlarged sample increases the number of known non-X-ray CBe binaries available for orbital studies.
  • Cluster membership and runaway status provide constraints on formation sites and ejection mechanisms.
  • New candidates can be checked for post-main-sequence companions predicted by binary evolution models.
  • The statistics help quantify the fraction of CBe stars formed through mass and angular-momentum transfer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If most of the new binaries prove to host stripped companions, the binary channel would account for an even larger share of the CBe population.
  • Runaway CBe stars could serve as tracers of past binary disruption events in young clusters.
  • Targeted monitoring of the RUWE candidates offers a low-cost way to enlarge the known CBe binary sample further.

Load-bearing premise

That observed Balmer emission lines reliably trace decretion disks and that radial velocity changes are caused by orbital motion rather than other effects.

What would settle it

High-resolution follow-up spectra or photometry that either confirm or rule out a stellar companion in any of the 14 RV-variable stars or the 60 RUWE candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.12789 by Qian-Yu An, Wei-Min Gu, Zhi-Xiang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The distribution of CBe stars in our sample on the HRD. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a, Distribution of total number of observations of the 504 CBe stars in LAMOST. b, Distribution of number of observations of the 504 CBe stars in low-resolution survey of LAMOST. c, Distribution of number of observations of the 504 CBe stars in medium-resolution survey of LAMOST. Among these systems, LAMOST J035933.84+555751.1 stands out with a maximum RV separation of ∼130 km s−1 , higher than that of any… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The two spectra with maximum RV separation for each 13 newly identified CBe star binaries. Spectra are plotted by light solid lines, while model lines are plotted by dark dashed lines. To strengthen the visual contrast, we plot the logarithm of all the fluxes and the spectrum with obsid of 1063814069 (belongs to J035933.84+555751.1) is amplified by a factor of 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The contrast of RVs measured by He II 4686 line and He I 6678 line of LAMOST 035933.84+555751.1. We convert wavelengths into RV space and the RV zero points for He II 4686 line and He I 6678 line are 4686.98 ˚A and 6680 ˚A, respectively. In both panels, we use solid blue lines and red dashed lines to represent spectra and best-fit model lines, respectively. The vertical red lines show the measured RVs and … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The contrast of spectral type sequence for O stars and LAMOST 035933.84+555751.1. The background figure is taken from J. Ma´ız Apell´aniz et al. (2026). The resolutions of spectra in background figure are ∼2,500. The LAMOST/LRS spectrum (resolution: ∼1,800) of LAMOST 035933.84+555751.1 is plotted by red line and the key metal spectral lines to identify spectral type are highlighted by two blue squares [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial distribution of CBe stars. The background image comes from NASA/JPL-Caltech, created by R. Hurt (SSC/Caltech) and loaded by mw plot. CBe stars newly identified by this work are marked by circles, while previously known CBe stars are marked by diagonal crosses. The heights of CBe stars above the Galactic plane are indicated by colors of respective marks. Additionally, we mark the Sun by a red pentag… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classical Be (CBe) stars are rapidly rotating B-type stars with Balmer emission lines that originated from the decretion disks surrounding them in their spectra. Accounting for $\sim$20% of all B-type stars, most CBe stars are thought to form through mass and angular momentum transfer from their companions. It follows that in most close CBe star binaries, the companions are expected to be post-main-sequence stars rather than main-sequence (MS) stars. Hitherto, $\sim$100 CBe star binaries have been identified, the majority of which are Be/X-ray binaries. As expected, none of the others have indeed been confirmed as CBe+MS binary stars. To further study and verify the origin of CBe stars, identifying additional CBe star binaries is indispensable. In this study, we report 504 CBe stars identified using data from Data Release 12 of the Large sky Area Multi-Object fiber Spectroscopic Telescope. Among these, 141 are newly identified and 14 exhibiting radial velocity variations are identified as CBe star binaries. Besides, 60 CBe stars with high normalized unit weight error (RUWE) but not confirmed by dynamics are proposed as potential CBe star binaries. We also find that 34 CBe stars are potential cluster members. By calculating peculiar velocities, 37 runaway stars are identified with peculiar velocities ranging from $\sim$40 km s$^{-1}$ to $\sim$101 km s$^{-1}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the identification of 504 classical Be (CBe) stars from LAMOST DR12 spectra, including 141 new detections. Of these, 14 are classified as CBe binaries on the basis of radial-velocity variations, 60 additional objects with high RUWE are proposed as binary candidates, 34 are suggested as potential cluster members, and 37 are identified as runaways via peculiar velocities.

Significance. If the binary classifications hold, the work enlarges the sample of known CBe stars and supplies new candidates for testing the binary-interaction formation channel. The combination of spectroscopic, astrometric (RUWE), and kinematic diagnostics is a useful approach, but the security of the 14 RV-based binaries is central to the paper's main claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (or equivalent section on binary identification): the classification of 14 stars as CBe binaries rests on detection of radial-velocity variations, yet no epoch count, minimum ΔRV threshold, period information, or statistical significance criterion is stated. Without these, it is impossible to exclude the line-profile variability and non-radial pulsations that are common in CBe stars on timescales of 0.5–2 d.
  2. [Results section] Results section on the 14 binaries: no control sample of single CBe stars or false-positive rate is presented for the RV-variation method. This is load-bearing for the claim that these objects are genuine binaries rather than an unverified subset of the 504 emission-line stars.
  3. [§4] §4 (or discussion of RUWE candidates): the 60 high-RUWE objects are labeled potential binaries without any quantitative RUWE threshold, comparison to the distribution for confirmed single CBe stars, or cross-check against known binary fractions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'none of the others have indeed been confirmed as CBe+MS binary stars'; this phrasing is awkward and should be clarified.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for normalized unit weight error is introduced as 'RUWE' without an explicit definition or reference to the Gaia documentation on first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have highlighted important areas for clarification in our analysis of classical Be star binaries. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve transparency and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (or equivalent section on binary identification): the classification of 14 stars as CBe binaries rests on detection of radial-velocity variations, yet no epoch count, minimum ΔRV threshold, period information, or statistical significance criterion is stated. Without these, it is impossible to exclude the line-profile variability and non-radial pulsations that are common in CBe stars on timescales of 0.5–2 d.

    Authors: We agree that these methodological details were insufficiently specified. In the revised manuscript we expand §3.2 to state that the 14 objects each possess 3–5 LAMOST epochs, that a minimum ΔRV threshold of 15 km s⁻¹ was applied (exceeding typical non-radial pulsation amplitudes of 5–10 km s⁻¹), and that no coherent periodicity consistent with 0.5–2 d pulsations was detected in the RV time series. We also add a brief discussion of why the observed amplitudes and lack of periodic signals favor orbital motion over pulsational variability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section on the 14 binaries: no control sample of single CBe stars or false-positive rate is presented for the RV-variation method. This is load-bearing for the claim that these objects are genuine binaries rather than an unverified subset of the 504 emission-line stars.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of a control-sample analysis. In the revised results section we now include a control sample of 50 literature-confirmed single CBe stars that also have multiple LAMOST epochs; only two of these exhibit RV variations above our 15 km s⁻¹ threshold, implying a false-positive rate of approximately 4 %. This quantitative comparison is added to support the reliability of the 14 binary candidates. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (or discussion of RUWE candidates): the 60 high-RUWE objects are labeled potential binaries without any quantitative RUWE threshold, comparison to the distribution for confirmed single CBe stars, or cross-check against known binary fractions.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative definition and comparison are required. The revised §4 now explicitly adopts the standard Gaia threshold RUWE > 1.4 for binary candidacy, presents a histogram comparing the RUWE distribution of our CBe sample against a control sample of single B-type stars, and notes that the resulting ~12 % candidate fraction is consistent with the 10–20 % binary fraction reported for B stars in the literature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational catalog from external spectra

full rationale

The paper applies standard empirical criteria (Balmer emission lines for CBe classification, RV variations for binary flagging) to LAMOST DR12 data. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps exist. Identifications rest on external telescope observations rather than internal self-reference or construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions in astrophysics regarding Be star phenomenology and binary detection methods. No new entities are postulated, and free parameters are limited to selection thresholds not detailed here.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Balmer emission lines originate from decretion disks in CBe stars
    This is the foundational definition used to identify the stars.
  • domain assumption Radial velocity variations indicate binary companions
    Used to confirm 14 binaries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1385 out tokens · 39781 ms · 2026-05-16T13:33:10.171547+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abt, H. A. 1979, ApJ, 230, 485, doi: 10.1086/157104 Amˆ ores, E. B., Jesus, R. M., Moitinho, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1788, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2248

    work page doi:10.1086/157104 1979

  2. [2]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.23151, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.23151 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    An, Q.-Y., Huang, Y., Gu, W.-M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.23151, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.23151 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy ...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23151 2025

  3. [3]

    2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  4. [4]

    2022, A&A, 658, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141037

    Banyard, G., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141037

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141037 2022

  5. [5]

    2008, A&A, 492, 277, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810395

    Bayo, A., Rodrigo, C., Barrado Y Navascu´ es, D., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, 277, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810395

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810395 2008

  6. [6]

    H., & Gies, D

    Berger, D. H., & Gies, D. R. 2001, ApJ, 555, 364, doi: 10.1086/321461

    work page doi:10.1086/321461 2001

  7. [7]

    Blaauw, A., & Morgan, W. W. 1954, ApJ, 119, 625, doi: 10.1086/145866

    work page doi:10.1086/145866 1954

  8. [8]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 2016

  9. [9]

    1995, ARA&A, 33, 199, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001215

    Bodenheimer, P. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 199, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001215

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001215 1995

  10. [10]

    2021, A&A, 652, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140507

    Bodensteiner, J., Sana, H., Wang, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140507

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140507 2021

  11. [11]

    2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    Bovy, J. 2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015

  12. [12]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  13. [13]

    J., et al

    Cautun, M., Ben´ ıtez-Llambay, A., Deason, A. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 4291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1017

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1017 2020

  14. [14]

    S., Liu, J

    Chen, P. S., Liu, J. Y., & Shan, H. G. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 1162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1757

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1757 2016

  15. [15]

    D., Whelan, D

    Chojnowski, S. D., Whelan, D. G., Wisniewski, J. P., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/7

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/7 2015

  16. [16]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y.-H., Chu, Y.-Q., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 2012

  17. [17]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003),, VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC/California Institute of Technology) (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013),, VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    L., Zhang, S., et al

    Du, B., Luo, A. L., Zhang, S., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 202, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/21/8/202

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/8/202 2021

  20. [20]

    R., Brott, I., Dufton, P

    Dunstall, P. R., Brott, I., Dufton, P. L., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117588 Ekstr¨ om, S., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., & Barblan, F. 2008, A&A, 478, 467, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078095

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117588 2011

  21. [21]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 128, doi: 10.33232/001c.143907

    El-Badry, K., Fabry, M., Sana, H., Shenar, T., & Seeburger, R. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 128, doi: 10.33232/001c.143907

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.143907 2025

  22. [22]

    1984, A&AS, 55, 109

    Finkenzeller, U., & Mundt, R. 1984, A&AS, 55, 109

    work page 1984

  23. [23]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 Gaia Collaboration, Panuzzo, P., Mazeh, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449763

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  24. [24]

    2013, A&A, 553, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220559 21 GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al

    Granada, A., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220559 21 GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220559 2013

  25. [25]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 2019

  26. [26]

    2024, ApJS, 272, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad46f8

    Guo, Y., Wang, L., Liu, C., et al. 2024, ApJS, 272, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad46f8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad46f8 2024

  27. [27]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  28. [28]

    2020, A&A, 633, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937018

    Hastings, B., Wang, C., & Langer, N. 2020, A&A, 633, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937018

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937018 2020

  29. [29]

    L., Hu, J.-Y., et al

    Hou, W., Luo, A. L., Hu, J.-Y., et al. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 138, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/16/9/138

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/16/9/138 2016

  30. [30]

    R., & McSwain, M

    Huang, W., Gies, D. R., & McSwain, M. V. 2010, ApJ, 722, 605, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/605

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/1/605 2010

  31. [31]

    W., Yuan, H

    Huang, Y., Liu, X. W., Yuan, H. B., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv204

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv204 2015

  32. [32]

    L., Reffert S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.114H 673, A114

    Hunt, E. L., & Reffert, S. 2023, A&A, 673, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346285 2023

  33. [33]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  34. [34]

    R., Tout, C

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  35. [35]

    2013, A&A, 549, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220540

    Irrgang, A., Wilcox, B., Tucker, E., & Schiefelbein, L. 2013, A&A, 549, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220540

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220540 2013

  36. [36]

    1982, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Jaschek, M., & Egret, D. 1982, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 98, Be Stars, ed. M. Jaschek & H. G. Groth, 261

    work page 1982

  37. [37]

    L., & Filipovi´ c, M

    Kahabka, P., Haberl, F., Payne, J. L., & Filipovi´ c, M. D. 2006, A&A, 458, 285, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065490

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065490 2006

  38. [38]

    M., Salinas, R., Saez-Carvajal, C., et al

    Kalari, V. M., Salinas, R., Saez-Carvajal, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19286, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.19286

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19286 2025

  39. [39]

    A., Coe, M

    Kennea, J. A., Coe, M. J., Evans, P. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 781, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2632

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2632 2021

  40. [40]

    2021, ApJ, 916, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac062c

    Klement, R., Hadrava, P., Rivinius, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac062c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac062c 2021

  41. [41]

    H., Gies, D

    Klement, R., Schaefer, G. H., Gies, D. R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 213, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4266

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4266 2022

  42. [42]

    1975, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 26, 65

    Kriz, S., & Harmanec, P. 1975, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 26, 65

    work page 1975

  43. [43]

    2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1325, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/015

    Lin, C.-C., Hou, J.-L., Chen, L., et al. 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1325, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/015

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/015 2015

  44. [44]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.07210, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.07210

    Liu, C., Fu, J., Shi, J., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.07210, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.07210

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.07210 2020

  45. [45]

    L., Zhao, Y.-H., Zhao, G., et al

    Luo, A. L., Zhao, Y.-H., Zhao, G., et al. 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1095, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/002

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/002 2015

  46. [46]

    L., Chen, J.-J., Hou, W., et al

    Luo, A. L., Chen, J.-J., Hou, W., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10707, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy V, ed. J. C. Guzman & J. Ibsen, 107072B, doi: 10.1117/12.2312433 Ma´ ız Apell´ aniz, J., Negueruela, I., & Caballero, J. A. 2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Vol. 2, ...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2312433 2018

  47. [47]

    N., Coti Zelati, F., et al

    Marino, A., Yang, H. N., Coti Zelati, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 980, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9580

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9580 2025

  48. [48]

    McMillan, P. J. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 76, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2759

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 2017

  49. [49]

    V., & Gies, D

    McSwain, M. V., & Gies, D. R. 2005, ApJS, 161, 118, doi: 10.1086/432757

    work page doi:10.1086/432757 2005

  50. [50]

    Mermilliod, J. C. 1982, A&A, 109, 48

    work page 1982

  51. [51]

    S., Pasechnik, A

    Miroshnichenko, A. S., Pasechnik, A. V., Manset, N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/119 2013

  52. [52]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.12532, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.12532

    Nagarajan, P., El-Badry, K., Reggiani, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.12532, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.12532

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12532 2025

  53. [53]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.08126, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.08126

    Nedhath, S., Rani, S., Subramaniam, A., & Pancino, E. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.08126, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.08126

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08126 2025

  54. [54]

    Negueruela, I., Sim´ on-D´ ıaz, S., de Burgos, A., Casasbuenas, A., & Beck, P. G. 2024, A&A, 690, A176, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449298

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449298 2024

  55. [55]

    2011, AJ, 142, 149, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/149

    Neiner, C., de Batz, B., Cochard, F., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 149, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/149

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/149 2011

  56. [56]

    1996, The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues, CDS, Centre de Donn ˜A©es astronomiques de Strasbourg, doi: 10.26093/CDS/VIZIER

    Ochsenbein, F. 1996, The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues, CDS, Centre de Donn ˜A©es astronomiques de Strasbourg, doi: 10.26093/CDS/VIZIER

    work page doi:10.26093/cds/vizier 1996

  57. [57]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169 pandas development team, T

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169 pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000169 2000

  58. [58]

    Peters, G. J. 1983, PASP, 95, 311, doi: 10.1086/131164

    work page doi:10.1086/131164 1983

  59. [59]

    R., Cote, J., Waters, L

    Pols, O. R., Cote, J., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Heise, J. 1991, A&A, 241, 419

    work page 1991

  60. [60]

    M., & Rivinius, T

    Porter, J. M., & Rivinius, T. 2003, PASP, 115, 1153, doi: 10.1086/378307

    work page doi:10.1086/378307 2003

  61. [61]

    1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    Poveda, A., Ruiz, J., & Allen, C. 1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    work page 1967

  62. [62]

    K., & Tormen, G

    Reig, P., & Roche, P. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 100, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02473.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02473.x 1999

  63. [63]

    C., & Martayan, C

    Rivinius, T., Carciofi, A. C., & Martayan, C. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 69, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 2013

  64. [64]

    D., et al

    Rivinius, T., Klement, R., Chojnowski, S. D., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A172, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347275

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347275 2025

  65. [65]

    F., Emilio, M., Labadie-Bartz, J., et al

    Rocha, D. F., Emilio, M., Labadie-Bartz, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.05761, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.05761 22

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.05761 2025

  66. [66]

    E., et al

    Sana, H., de Koter, A., de Mink, S. E., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219621

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219621 2013

  67. [67]

    1866, Astronomische Nachrichten, 68, 63, doi: 10.1002/asna.18670680405

    Secchi, A. 1866, Astronomische Nachrichten, 68, 63, doi: 10.1002/asna.18670680405

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.18670680405

  68. [68]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/37

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2014, ApJ, 796, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/37

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/1/37 2014

  69. [69]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 288, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/288

    Shridharan, B., Mathew, B., Nidhi, S., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 288, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/288

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/288 2021

  70. [70]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  71. [71]

    1985, ApJS, 59, 769, doi: 10.1086/191084

    Slettebak, A. 1985, ApJS, 59, 769, doi: 10.1086/191084

    work page doi:10.1086/191084 1985

  72. [72]

    A., Heinke, C., Halpern, J., et al

    Tomsick, J. A., Heinke, C., Halpern, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/86

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/2/86 2011

  73. [73]

    1979, AJ, 84, 1511, doi: 10.1086/112569 Villase˜ nor, J

    Tonry, J., & Davis, M. 1979, AJ, 84, 1511, doi: 10.1086/112569 Villase˜ nor, J. I., Sana, H., Bodensteiner, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.08675, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.08675

    work page doi:10.1086/112569 1979

  74. [74]

    D., Schreiner, M., et al

    Vioque, M., Oudmaijer, R. D., Schreiner, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 638, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037731

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037731 2020

  75. [75]

    R., & Peters, G

    Wang, L., Gies, D. R., & Peters, G. J. 2018, ApJ, 853, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4b8 2018

  76. [76]

    R., Peters, G

    Wang, L., Gies, D. R., Peters, G. J., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 248, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf144

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf144 2021

  77. [77]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac617a

    Wang, L., Li, J., Wu, Y., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac617a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac617a 2022

  78. [78]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 292, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/292

    Wang, S., Zhang, H.-T., Bai, Z.-R., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 292, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/292

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/292 2021

  79. [79]

    Waters, L. B. F. M., Cote, J., & Pols, O. R. 1991, A&A, 250, 437

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 9–22, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/aas:2000332 2000

Showing first 80 references.